[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 39 (Thursday, March 10, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1402-S1403]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FILLING THE SUPREME COURT VACANCY
Mr. BARRASSO. Madam President, I come to the floor today to talk
about what I have been hearing from people in Wyoming about the issue
of whether President Obama should nominate the next Supreme Court
Justice.
This past last weekend, I was around the State of Wyoming in Rock
Springs, in Rawlings, and in Casper and the weekend before that, as
well, in Casper, Cheyenne, and Big Piney. I am hearing the same thing
from all around the State of Wyoming.
What I am hearing is that President Obama should not be the one to
put another nominee on the Supreme Court and that it should come down
to the people: Give the people a voice. That is what I am hearing back
home.
The chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Grassley, is doing
exactly what the people of Wyoming are insisting upon--the right thing.
He is doing the right thing by insisting that the American people
decide. I think Senator Grassley is doing a great service to this body,
to the American people, and also to whomever the next President
nominates for the Supreme Court.
On Monday, after traveling around the State of Wyoming, Senator Enzi,
who had also traveled around the State of Wyoming this past weekend,
and I jointly held a telephone townhall meeting. Folks at home are very
familiar with these. We do these just about every month. We have a
chance to visit with people about what is on their mind. Then there is
a little way you can do a poll during that telephone townhall meeting,
and 88 percent of the people of Wyoming agree with Senator Grassley,
agree with Senator Enzi and with me about the next Supreme Court
Justice and giving the people a voice.
Democrats want to turn this all around into a fight on the Senate
floor. They want this to be a backroom deal between the President and
the special interest groups. These are the groups that are pushing the
President to appoint someone who will rule the way they want. But that
is not what the American people want.
The American people--and certainly the people in Wyoming--want this
to be a fight about what happens and what they decide in the voting
booth in November. When an election is just months away, the people
should be allowed to consider possible Supreme Court nominees as one
factor in deciding whom they will support for President. This shouldn't
really even be controversial.
Democrats in the past have come to the floor, and they said it would
be a bad idea to let the President make a lifetime appointment in his
last months in office. In 1992 Senator Joe Biden came to the Senate
floor to explain his rule. He called it the Biden rule, and it had to
do with Supreme Court nominations.
On the Senate floor, Joe Biden--now the Vice President, former
chairman of the Judiciary Committee--said that once the Presidential
election is underway--and I will tell you, Madam President, the
Presidential election is underway--``action on a Supreme Court
nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over.''
Those are the words of Joe Biden. Senator Biden said that a temporary
vacancy on the Court was ``quite minor compared to the cost that a
nominee, the President, the Senate, and our Nation would have to pay
for what assuredly would be a bitter fight.''
That is what Senator Biden at the time was worried about. He was
worried that a bitter fight over a nominee would do damage to the
nominee and to the Senate. He knew there would be Senators who would
come to the floor and try to politicize this process for their own
purposes, and we are seeing the Democrats doing that right now. He knew
it because that is what Democrats have done for years.
This is politics as usual for the Democrats. It is the way they tend
to live their lives here on the Senate floor--talking this way. It is
exactly what Democrats did when Robert Bork was nominated to serve on
the Supreme Court. So Vice President Biden, former Senator Biden,
understands it completely. It is what they did when Miguel Estrada was
nominated to the circuit court. It is what Democrats did when Samuel
Alito was nominated to the Supreme Court. Democrats in the Senate even
filibustered Justice Alito when he was the nominee. They did everything
they could to slander good, qualified people to try to score political
points. It is what they do.
[[Page S1403]]
Well, there is no need for us to have this bitter political fight
that Joe Biden worried about. Republicans have said there should not be
a bitter political fight. We have called on the President to spare the
country this fight. The best way to avoid the fight is to agree to let
the people decide. Give the people a voice, and let the next President
put forth the nomination. That is certainly what the people of Wyoming
want us to do. It is what I heard, along with Senator Enzi, on the
telephone townhall meeting this past Monday, and that is what I heard
as I traveled around the State of Wyoming the past several weekends. I
will be back in Wyoming this weekend, and I expect to hear the same
thing as I travel to Buffalo to the health fair and to communities
around the State.
That is what the American people are saying: Give the people a voice.
They are saying that a seat on the Supreme Court should not be just
another political payoff to score points in an election year. They are
saying it should not be a decision for a lameduck President with one
foot out the door. It is too important for that.
The Supreme Court is functioning just fine with eight Justices right
now. That is not me saying it; it is the Justices of the Supreme Court
saying the same thing. Since Justice Scalia died last month, the Court
has heard oral arguments in 10 cases. They have released written
opinions in five cases. They have scheduled more cases for the rest of
the term, and they are doing their jobs. That is exactly what Justice
Breyer said they would do. He is a liberal Supreme Court Justice who
was appointed by President Bill Clinton.
A reporter asked Justice Breyer about the death of Justice Scalia,
and he said: ``We'll miss him, but we'll do our work.'' He said: ``For
the most part, it will not change.''
So there is no urgency to fill this vacancy on the Supreme Court
right now. There is no danger in waiting for the next President to act.
There is tremendous danger, however, if we rush through a nomination in
the last few months of a Presidential election, to the nominee, to the
Senate, and to the Nation, just as Joe Biden said 24 years ago. The
stakes are very high, too high to let that happen.
The people are telling us what they want. Eighty-eight percent of the
people in Wyoming involved in our telephone townhall meeting on Monday
said exactly that: Give the people a voice. We must let the people
decide.
Madam President, I yield the floor.
____________________