[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 38 (Wednesday, March 9, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1354-S1355]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MOBILE NOW ACT
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, over the last 20 years we have seen
incredible advancements in computing, telecommunications, and
information technology. The United States has led the world in this
innovation thanks to our brilliant entrepreneurs, scientists, world-
class universities, massive private sector capital investment, a
culture that rewards risk-taking, and a favorable regulatory
environment, but increasingly our lead in innovation is threatened as
American businesses are forced to contend with an ever-growing number
of outdated laws and regulations. While our businesses have often
managed to succeed anyway, American industries deserve better from our
government.
Congress has a responsibility to ensure that our statutes and
regulations are appropriately and narrowly tailored for today's economy
and for the future. My Commerce Committee colleagues and I have been
eager to do our part in ensuring our Nation's communications laws keep
pace with innovation. Last week, we unanimously passed the bipartisan
MOBILE NOW Act, which I introduced, along with the committee's ranking
member Senator Bill Nelson. This legislation will give a boost to
American innovators who are looking to make the next generation of
wireless technology, known as 5G, a reality.
Mr. President, 5G wireless will obviously mean things like faster
movie downloads and more advanced smartphones, and it will also mean
massive leaps forward in areas like technology, entertainment, public
safety, and health care, as well as other economic benefits that will
make American lives better.
One of the best examples I have heard came from former FCC
Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker. She pointed out that right now a
Smart Car communicating with 4G wireless technology takes 4\1/2\ feet
to brake in response to an obstacle. By contrast, a Smart car with 5G
technology would travel only 1 inch before braking, which could be the
difference between life and death. In order to make 5G wireless
technology a reality, we have to put the right policies in place.
Policies that maximize the efficiency of the airwaves that transmit
wireless broadband signals and the bands of electromagnetic spectrum
that make up our Nation's airwaves are in limited supply. While we
can't make more airwaves to carry additional spectrum, we can make
changes to how they are used and who uses them in order to improve
efficiency and to do more of what we have.
The MOBILE NOW Act will require the government to make at least 255
megahertz of spectrum available for private sector broadband use by the
year 2020. That is a lot of spectrum, but MOBILE NOW doesn't stop
there. The bill also directs government to assess more than 12,000
megahertz of superhigh frequency spectrum for wireless broadband
suitability. For technical reasons, that spectrum has seen only limited
use to date, but as new technologies come online in the next few years,
this spectrum will become increasingly viable.
Indeed, most people expect that these superhigh bands will become
critical for our 5G future. Making spectrum available is important, but
freeing up spectrum does not help our digital economy unless and until
we put it to good use. This is why several of MOBILE NOW's provisions
focus on speeding up the deployment of the communications facilities at
the heart of our Nation's broadband networks. One way to do that is by
putting a shot clock on Federal agencies to force them to make speedy
decisions on companies' applications to place wireless facilities on
Federal property. This is critical for rural States like South Dakota
and Nevada where placing wireless facilities on Federal lands could
bring more high-speed Internet service to underserved communities.
The MOBILE NOW Act is an example of what is possible when Members put
aside their partisan differences and work together to come up with
commonsense proposals to spur economic growth. In addition to the
provisions Senator Nelson and I wrote, MOBILE NOW also includes all or
part of six other bills which represent the work of Senators Booker,
Daines, Fischer, Gardner, Klobuchar, Manchin, Moran, Rubio, Schatz, and
Udall. We also adopted important amendments from Senators Heller and
Peters. Even the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Environment
and Public Works Committee--Senator Inhofe, as well as a longtime
former member of the Commerce Committee, Senator Boxer--made key
contributions to the bill's ``dig once'' section.
The MOBILE NOW Act would not have been possible without the
collaboration of these Senators. So it is my hope that this spirit of
bipartisanship will also carry over to the Commerce Committee's efforts
to reauthorize the Federal Communications Commission. Compared to other
Federal agencies, the FCC is relatively small. But as the regulator of
the communications and technology industries, both of which are central
to America's modern economy, the Commission has significant influence
over the direction of our country.
Given the importance of the FCC, my colleagues might be surprised to
learn that Congress has not reauthorized it in more than a quarter of a
century. You have to go back to 1990 to find the last time that the
FCC, or the Federal Communications Commission, was reauthorized.
The work of the FCC has continued during that period, of course, but
reauthorizing this agency every 2 years ensures that Congress will be
able to make sure that the FCC has all the tools it needs to keep up
with our rapidly changing digital landscape. Some 26 years ago--I think
it is safe to say--none of us in this Chamber knew anything about the
Web, let alone about smartphones or streaming videos.
Since then, the communications landscape has been fundamentally
transformed by digital technology, mobile services, and the Internet.
Yet the FCC in that entire time has gone unauthorized, making it the
oldest expired authorization in the Commerce Committee's broad
jurisdiction. I hope we can change that.
On Monday I introduced the FCC Reauthorization Act of 2016, which
includes a handful of noncontroversial, good-government reforms to go
with a 2-year reauthorization window. By restarting the FCC's regular
authorization cycle, the bill will ensure that necessary congressional
oversight of the FCC's budget and procedures occur routinely.
As indicated by the FCC Commissioners themselves at our oversight
hearing last week, a consistent legislative reauthorization process
will produce a more responsible and a more productive relationship
between Congress and the Commission. This will result in better
outcomes for both consumers and the rapidly growing broadband-based
economy.
Telecom policy was once considered to be one of the least partisan
issues in Congress. While the campaign for net neutrality has certainly
changed the political playing field over the last decade, I believe
there is still a lot of room for bipartisanship on tech and
telecommunications issues. The MOBILE NOW Act and the FCC
Reauthorization Act are two bills that can make a real difference. I
look forward to working with colleagues on the Commerce Committee and
in the full Senate to pass both of these bills in the coming months.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Missouri.
Mr. BLUNT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for up to
15 minutes.
[[Page S1355]]
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________