[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 34 (Wednesday, March 2, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1218-S1219]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH V. HELLERSTEDT
Mr. REID. Mr. President, today the Supreme Court heard the oral
arguments in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. At issue in this case
is a Texas law that puts restrictions on women's health clinics and
providers.
Contrary to what proponents claim, these restrictions do not enhance
women's health in any way. They are medically unnecessary, according to
groups like the American Medical Association and the American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Instead, these restrictions serve
just one purpose: to restrict women's access to clinics.
If the Texas law stands, nearly three-quarters of the State's clinics
will be
[[Page S1219]]
forced to close. That would leave just 10 clinics statewide to serve
5.4 million Texan women of reproductive age. But unfortunately, this is
the type of thing we have come to expect from the State of Texas. The
Texas Legislature and Governor have already passed laws that infringe
on its citizens' constitutional rights.
For example, the State has passed laws that limit victims' ability to
recover much-deserved damages after accidents. And they have passed one
of the strictest voter ID laws in the Nation. We are seeing the results
of the State's pattern of undermining their citizens' constitutional
rights. Just yesterday it was reported that more than half a million
registered voters in Texas can't even vote.
This is the pattern of disenfranchisement Texas is engaged in. The
State's women are, sadly, the latest example of Texas infringing on
important constitutional rights. Though it is not entirely surprising
that the radical Republicans in Texas have targeted women's health, it
is nonetheless disappointing. I hope the Supreme Court will choose to
protect women's health and strike down this disastrous Texas law.
____________________