[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S717-S718]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EXECUTIVE CALENDAR
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will
proceed to executive session to consider the following nomination,
which the clerk will report.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read the nomination of Scot
Alan Marciel, of California, a Career Member of the Senior Foreign
Service, Class of Career Minister, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and
Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Union of Burma.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Arkansas.
Mr. COTTON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for up to
2 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
The Senator from Maryland
Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak for 2
minutes also.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Will the Senator so modify his request?
Mr. COTTON. I do modify my request.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. COTTON. Mr. President, I rise today in support not only of the
nomination of Scot Marciel to be our Ambassador to Burma but to
celebrate the remarkable change Burma is undergoing.
I recently traveled to Burma, leading a congressional delegation
hosted by our Embassy there, Ambassador Derek Mitchell, and Deputy
Chief of Mission Kristen Bauer.
Burma has undergone a remarkable transition. After 50 years of a
brutal military dictatorship, Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi and her
party won a landslide election in November. The military is still
entrenched in power, but gradual change is occurring, in part thanks to
U.S. policies. It is change we should continue to support.
Sitting at the intersection of China and India, Burma is a
geostrategically critical country. Sitting, as it does, between the
crossroads of Southeast Asia and the Middle East, it is critical to the
War on Terror. Burma can be a potent trading partner because of its
largely untapped natural resources and is a shining example of the
strategic impact of U.S. moral leadership in the world.
Those elections were not the end of the work, though; they are only
the beginning of the work. The military still has a deep role in the
Constitution. The National League for Democracy needs to transition
from an opposition party to a governing party. Burma must address its
internal ethnic conflicts, and, like most countries, it needs to
address corruption and economic reforms as well. Our mission team in
Rangoon is working on all these matters and more. I know that
[[Page S718]]
Ambassador Marciel looks forward to leading that team and continuing to
strengthen the U.S.-Burma relationship.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland.
Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I rise to join Senator Cotton in urging
our colleagues to vote for the confirmation of Scot Marciel to be
Ambassador to Burma for the reasons Senator Cotton pointed out.
There are exciting things happening in Burma. It is a country in
transition. We have seen some promise. There are still major challenges
in that country. We clearly need a confirmed ambassador. It is
important that the Senate act, and I am glad to see we will be acting
in a few moments.
We couldn't have a more qualified person to take on the
ambassadorship of Burma than Scot Marciel. He currently serves as the
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific
Affairs. I got to know him very well in that capacity in the last
Congress when I chaired the subcommittee of the Senate Foreign
Relations on East Asia and the Pacific. He is a career diplomat who has
taken on some of the most challenging positions in Foreign Service,
including being the Chief of Mission in Indonesia. He has devoted his
life to these challenges. I know he will do an excellent job
representing U.S. interests in Burma.
I urge our colleagues to support the nomination.
Mr. President, I yield back the time.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is, Will the Senate advise and
consent to the Marciel nomination?
Mr. MENENDEZ. I ask for the yeas and nays.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the
Senator from Texas (Mr. Cruz), the Senator from South Carolina (Mr.
Graham), the Senator from Idaho (Mr. Risch), the Senator from Florida
(Mr. Rubio), the Senator from Nebraska (Mr. Sasse), the Senator from
Pennsylvania (Mr. Toomey), and the Senator from Louisiana (Mr. Vitter).
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Maryland (Ms. Mikulski),
the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders), and the Senator from New
Hampshire (Mrs. Shaheen) are necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The result was announced--yeas 90, nays 0, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 19 Ex.]
YEAS--90
Alexander
Ayotte
Baldwin
Barrasso
Bennet
Blumenthal
Blunt
Booker
Boozman
Boxer
Brown
Burr
Cantwell
Capito
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Cassidy
Coats
Cochran
Collins
Coons
Corker
Cornyn
Cotton
Crapo
Daines
Donnelly
Durbin
Enzi
Ernst
Feinstein
Fischer
Flake
Franken
Gardner
Gillibrand
Grassley
Hatch
Heinrich
Heitkamp
Heller
Hirono
Hoeven
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kaine
King
Kirk
Klobuchar
Lankford
Leahy
Lee
Manchin
Markey
McCain
McCaskill
McConnell
Menendez
Merkley
Moran
Murkowski
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Paul
Perdue
Peters
Portman
Reed
Reid
Roberts
Rounds
Schatz
Schumer
Scott
Sessions
Shelby
Stabenow
Sullivan
Tester
Thune
Tillis
Udall
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wicker
Wyden
NOT VOTING--10
Cruz
Graham
Mikulski
Risch
Rubio
Sanders
Sasse
Shaheen
Toomey
Vitter
The nomination was confirmed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from South Dakota.
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the motion to
reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Under the previous order, the President will be immediately notified
of the Senate's action.
____________________