[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 21 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Senate]
[Pages S662-S663]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AGRICULTURAL EXPORT EXPANSION ACT
Ms. HEITKAMP. Mr. President, I rise to talk about a bill which I
introduced that I would love to have the Presiding Officer's
sponsorship, given how important the Port of Louisiana is to American
agriculture and certainly commodities that we ship across the world. It
is called the Agricultural Export Expansion Act that I introduced with
Senator Boozman as my cosponsor. We have a great bipartisan lineup of
people who are interested in this.
So what does this bill do? I will say, very rarely does a day go by--
whether I am in North Dakota or whether I am here in Washington, DC--
that I don't speak with or hear from North Dakota farmers and ranchers.
The agriculture economy is absolutely critical to North Dakota. Almost
one-quarter of North Dakota workers are farmers and ranchers or they
are employed in farm-related jobs. During every meeting, farmers and
ranchers express the urgent need--the urgent need--to open trade with
Cuba and to stop tying the hands of our producers.
Just on Tuesday our barley growers were in my office telling me about
how important the market in Cuba could be. Last week it was the Dry
Bean Council telling me what I already know from my visit with Cuba:
The products we grow in the United States--like North Dakota pinto
beans or Arkansas rice--are compatible with the Cuban diet, and there
is high demand for our high-quality products.
These aren't just crops that North Dakota grows. These are crops that
North Dakota knows exceptionally well and that we excel in. My State is
the No. 1 producer of barley, multiple varieties of beans, lentils, and
certain types of wheat. Enabling agriculture exports to Cuba would be a
huge boon for North Dakota farmers and ranchers, as well as those from
many other States.
Unfortunately, because of trade barriers the United States puts on
itself, the Cuban people aren't eating North Dakota beans, Kansas wheat
or Arkansas rice. Instead, they are importing those products from
countries much further away--like Brazil, Canada, Europe, and even
Vietnam. I would say not only in terms of proximity of our product to
the Cuban market--which is a huge freight advantage--we also have the
highest quality of products. So we are forfeiting what in fact would be
a natural market for us. Think about that. In this day, where trade is
so important--where improving our balance of trade is so important--we
will not be able to access the Cuban market.
Congress has eased some restrictions on exports to Cuba for
agricultural products. They did that back in 2000 with the passage of
the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act. That was a great
first step. We did make some progress in increased sales to Cuba.
Unfortunately, now that same law is holding us back.
The administration made important changes to U.S. policy and opened
some travel and some trade to Cuba starting with their January 2015
changes. Most recently, including last month, the administration made
more changes, including allowing for financing of authorized exports to
Cuba. Unfortunately, those exports are other than agricultural exports.
Because of our once forward-looking bill, agricultural exporters are
prohibited now from offering financing that all other exporters can
provide to Cuba. That needs changing.
In 2014 I visited Cuba. I met with Cuban agricultural trade officials
to discuss bilateral economic benefits of expanding agricultural
exports from North Dakota and the United States to Cuba. These are
conversations we need to continue to have.
Last April I and Senator Boozman introduced our bipartisan bill to
level the playing field for our farmers and ranchers and make sure we
can compete with the rest of the world in Cuba. What does that bill do
and how does it improve our trade relationship with Cuba? One of the
greatest barriers we have in getting our products to Cuba is we can't
finance it. Some might say: Well, we don't want to put government
taxpayer dollars at risk. This bill does not put one taxpayer dollar at
risk. We are talking about opening the market so we can access private
financing for agricultural exports to Cuba. Let me repeat that. No
taxpayer dollars are at risk. It is based entirely on individual risk
assessment and decisions. Our bill is supported by the U.S.
Agricultural Coalition for Cuba, a wide-ranging coalition including
every grower group and industry association.
This week, the Cuban Government announced that El Nino is going to
create an even greater loss of agricultural products in Cuba. This is
going to create an even greater opportunity for our agricultural
exports--a greater opportunity. Why--why--why would we let other
countries keep eating our lunch and dominating this important market,
especially given our proximity? It is time for Congress to get out of
American agriculture's way and let private businesses make exporting
and financing decisions.
I urge all of my colleagues to cosponsor and help pass our bill, S.
1049, the Agricultural Export Expansion Act.
Finally, I want to talk about the challenges that American
agriculture has. Higher-dollar value has put tremendous stress on our
products. We have seen corn prices drop, we have seen soybean prices
drop, we have seen American agriculture challenged in ways we haven't
seen for the last decade. How do we fix that problem? With another
government program? Maybe we will have to help or expand the farm bill
to deal with our food security issues created by low commodity prices.
I will not take that off the table, but I will say the surest way that
we can get out from underneath these challenges is export, is to
provide for trade. It is one of the reasons I supported TPA. I believe
it is great for American commodities to access additional markets and
take down trade barriers to provide us with market, but why are we
artificially standing in the way of private investment and private
financing of American agricultural products? It is time that we do the
right thing by American agriculture and open this market. We can take
this incremental step without having this body agree to lifting any
kind of embargo. We can take this incremental step without changing the
prohibition we have on Federal-sponsored marketing programs. We can
begin to access the Cuban market and introduce our high-quality beans,
edible peas, and lentils. We can do that.
I will close with a story about my great friend Maria Cantwell from
the State of Washington. Washington also grows what we call a lot of
cross crops--although, I would argue that ours are probably even lot
better than what is grown in the State of Washington.
Maria Cantwell went on a trade mission to try to sell Washington
State
[[Page S663]]
lentils. After hours of listening to the trade officials and Mr.
Castro, she was successful in convincing him to buy lentils. The
lentils he eventually bought were from North Dakota.
We have an opportunity to access this market--not just for North
Dakota but for the State of Washington, for the State of Louisiana, for
the State of Arkansas, for the State of Kansas. For all of our
agricultural producers, open this market, give us the ability to do
what we do in every other place. We aren't putting taxpayer dollars at
risk. We are simply asking for access to markets.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. SASSE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________