[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 184 (Thursday, December 17, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8737-S8738]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNANIMOUS CONSENT REQUEST--H.R. 4188
Mr. SULLIVAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate
proceed to the immediate consideration of H.R. 4188, the Coast Guard
reauthorization, which was received from the House; I further ask that
the Thune substitute amendment be agreed to; that the bill, as amended,
be read a third time and passed; and that the motion to reconsider be
considered made and laid upon the table.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
The Senator from Delaware.
Mr. COONS. Mr. President, I object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard.
The Senator from Delaware.
Mr. COONS. Mr. President, if I might, let me briefly explain the
basis for my objection. I have had the opportunity to discuss this
matter with my colleague from the State of Alaska.
The cruise industry foreign-flags its vessels and thus pays no U.S.
income tax, yet it has asked for protections in this bill from remedies
sought by seamen for failing to pay wage and overtime, for remedies for
maintenance and cure, one of the oldest, internationally recognized
remedies for seafarers. These two remedies would keep the U.S. Merchant
Marine competitive. U.S.-flagged vessels are required to hire U.S.
seamen, and only by ensuring that workers on U.S. vessels and foreign-
flagged vessels, which sail in and out of U.S. ports carrying U.S.
passengers, have the same remedies can U.S. jobs be protected.
I have had the opportunity to discuss this issue with the Senator
from Alaska, and it is my hope that we can work diligently together to
address and clear issues of concern to myself and a number of my
colleagues. But until we have that opportunity to review the text and
to appropriately resolve concerns that arise from the Jones Act and the
longstanding workers compensation-type benefit I described called
maintenance and cure, my objection will continue.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alaska.
Mr. SULLIVAN. Mr. President, I want to talk about the broader issue
here. I appreciate the willingness of my colleague from Delaware to
work on this important issue. The Coast Guard reauthorization bill
passed out of the commerce committee unanimously in April.
We talk a lot about national security here on the Senate floor. We
talk about our men and women in uniform and how they are protecting us.
But I have always liked to mention the men and women in the Coast
Guard. Prior to 9/11, you can make a very strong argument that the
Coast Guard was probably the only uniformed service whose members were
risking their lives for Americans day in and day out every single day.
I think a lot of their heroism goes unnoticed. Trust me, in Alaska we
see it daily.
The Coast Guard admirably performs a variety of missions on a daily
basis throughout our great Nation with a team of fewer than 90,000
members comprised of Active-Duty, Reserve, civilian, and Volunteer
forces and an annual budget of less than $10 billion, with, let's face
it, a fleet of aging vessels and aircraft.
The ranking member of the commerce committee, Senator Nelson from
Florida, and I talk a lot about how heroic these men and women are and
how they deserve our attention, just like other members of the
military.
Last year the Coast Guard executed more than 17,500 search and rescue
missions--these are incredibly dangerous, by the way--in rough waters
off the coast of Alaska and Florida and Delaware and saved over 3,400
lives. Think about that--3,400 lives in 1 year. In addition, last year
the Coast Guard law enforcement crews interdicted over 140 metric tons
of narcotics, detained over 300 smugglers, and interdicted more than
3,500 migrants.
What we are talking about here is bipartisan legislation that needs
to be passed that will do one very important thing for our country and
the Coast Guard: It is going to improve the mission readiness and
performance of the Coast Guard. It demonstrates that the Congress of
the United States is paying attention to these brave young men and
women.
I am disappointed because we have worked hard to move this
legislation since April. We have worked hard. We stripped out
provisions that the other side had problems with. Section 605 is gone
now, to move this forward. So we have been working hard. I thought we
were going to pass this legislation this morning.
The provision my colleague from Delaware was talking about is section
606 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act, and it is simply looking to
create consistency and reduce forum shopping in lawsuits involving
mariners.
While I understand that some special interests--trial lawyers in
particular--are not always interested in judicial consistency or
efficiency because it is not in the interest of their bottom line, I
wish to remind this body that the provision we are talking about passed
overwhelmingly in the House of Representatives in a bipartisan manner--
not once, not twice, but three times in the past 2 years. Three times.
It is not a controversial provision.
Section 606 is about forum shopping for foreign mariners. In fact,
section 606 is not even about Americans; it is about forum shopping for
foreign mariners in foreign waters on foreign-flagged ships. That is
the issue which is holding up the reauthorization of the Coast Guard
bill for our brave men and women who serve in the Coast Guard. Why that
provision should be holding us up is beyond me.
But I did have a good discussion with my colleague from Delaware. We
are more than willing to continue to work with our colleagues to reach
consensus.
[[Page S8738]]
But I certainly hope we can get there today and not let one small
provision that is very focused on one special interest group hold up a
bipartisan bill which everybody on the commerce committee voted for and
which is going to do something very important: recognize the men and
women in the Coast Guard who risk their lives--just like everybody else
in the military--on a daily basis to protect Americans.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The assistant Democratic leader.
____________________