[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 178 (Wednesday, December 9, 2015)]
[House]
[Page H9084]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE URGENT NEED FOR CONGRESSIONAL ACTION ON PUERTO RICO
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Puerto Rico (Mr. Pierluisi) for 5 minutes.
Mr. PIERLUISI. Mr. Speaker, as my colleagues are aware, the heavily
indebted U.S. territory of Puerto Rico is ensnared in a severe economic
crisis.
My constituents are not responsible for this crisis, but they are its
primary victims. I know they would prefer to live, work, and raise a
family in Puerto Rico, but thousands are departing for the States every
month in search of quality of life, which is not available in Puerto
Rico. Each time an individual leaves because they feel compelled to go,
it represents a small human tragedy.
I have participated in five congressional hearings on Puerto Rico
this year. The message I delivered about the roots of the crisis was
clear and consistent. I have acknowledged that, over the years, Puerto
Rico's leaders, with a few exceptions, have demonstrated a lack of
discipline and transparency in managing Puerto Rico's public finances.
For this, we have no one to blame but ourselves.
But, as I have reiterated time and again, the crisis has a second,
equally significant source. It is the relationship between the Federal
Government and Puerto Rico, which is like the relationship between a
master and his servant.
This relationship is a national disgrace. It denies my constituents,
countless numbers of whom have served this country in uniform, the
fundamental right to vote for their national leaders. Remember this the
next time you hear our country lecture another country about the
importance of democracy.
As an advocate for statehood for Puerto Rico, I am a proud American
citizen. But protesting the mistreatment of my people will always take
precedence over being polite.
The relationship between the Federal Government and Puerto Rico
allows you to treat us decently when it suits you and to treat us
poorly whenever it does not. We live at your whim, subject to your
impulses, which are bound by virtually no legal rules or moral
standards.
If there is a silver lining in this crisis, it is that the crisis has
caused a clear majority of my constituents to conclude that the
relationship between the Federal Government and Puerto Rico must
change.
Puerto Rico must have equality in this Union or independence outside
of it. No longer should we be reduced to begging this Congress for
crumbs and hoping you throw some our way. We must get off our knees,
stand up straight, look you in the eye, and say ``No more.''
However, until Puerto Rico becomes a State or a sovereign nation, our
fate rests largely in the hands of Congress. I have introduced a series
of bills that would empower Puerto Rico to help itself. These bills
don't seek a handout or special treatment. They seek the same or
similar treatment as the States receive under the Federal health and
other safety net programs, Federal tax credit programs, and the Federal
law that authorizes debt restructuring.
If Congress declines to act, it will not be because my colleagues did
not have options to choose from. It will be because they made a
conscious decision not to choose at all.
Federal action is necessary to prevent a default by the Puerto Rico
Government on its obligations to creditors, which would be catastrophic
for all parties. To avoid this outcome, Congress should authorize
Puerto Rico to restructure a meaningful portion of its bonded debt, but
in a way that honors the territory's constitution.
Such authority can be provided at no cost to American taxpayers. If
it is, I will not oppose the creation of a temporary, independent board
that respects the Puerto Rico Government's primary role in crafting its
budget and making fiscal policy, but that is authorized to ensure that
the Puerto Rico Government complies with appropriate budgeting
standards and fiscal metrics.
Ultimately, what Puerto Rico needs is good elected leadership, not
heavy-handed Federal intervention that further erodes democracy in the
territory. It is in the national interest for Congress to act and to
act now.
____________________