[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 173 (Tuesday, December 1, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Page S8236]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CBO COST ESTIMATE--S. 720
Ms. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, in compliance with paragraph 11(a) of
rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee on Energy
and Natural Resources has obtained from the Congressional Budget Office
an estimate of the costs of S. 720, the Energy Savings and Industrial
Competitiveness Act of 2015, as reported from the committee. I
respectfully ask unanimous consent that the summary of the opinion of
the Congressional Budget Office be printed in the Congressional Record.
The full estimate is available on CBO's Web site www.cbo.gov.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate
S. 720--Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act of 2015
(October 19, 2015)
Summary: S. 720 would amend current law and authorize
appropriations for a variety activities and programs related
to energy efficiency. The bill would require federal agencies
that guarantee mortgages to consider whether homes with
energy-efficient improvements would affect borrowers' ability
to repay mortgages. The bill also would modify certain
energy-related goals and requirements for federal agencies.
CBO estimates that enacting S. 720 would increase direct
spending by $15 million over the 2016-2025 period; therefore,
pay-as-you-go procedures apply. Enacting the bill would not
affect revenues. In addition, CBO estimates that implementing
the legislation would cost $218 million over the next five
years, assuming appropriation actions consistent with the
legislation.
CBO estimates that enacting S. 720 would not increase on-
budget deficits or net direct spending by more than $5
billion in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods
beginning in 2026. S. 720 would impose an intergovernmental
mandate, as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA), by requiring states and tribal governments to certify
to the Department of Energy (DOE) whether or not they have
updated residential and commercial building codes to meet the
latest standards developed by building efficiency
organizations. CBO estimates that the cost of that mandate
would fall well below the annual threshold established in
UMRA for intergovernmental mandates ($77 million in 2015,
adjusted annually for inflation.) This bill contains no
private-sector mandates as defined in UMRA.
____________________