[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 165 (Thursday, November 5, 2015)]
[House]
[Pages H8145-H8148]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MESSAGES THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO HEAR
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 6, 2015, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas (Mr.
Gohmert) for 30 minutes.
Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Speaker, I do want to commend my friend from
Georgia. He speaks eloquently.
I hated to lose dear friend, John Linder, from here in this body. He
was a brilliant man, with great class. But since he is gone, I am
delighted to have Rob Woodall here in his stead--just clear-thinking,
articulate, and makes the case that the American people need to hear.
{time} 1330
Speaking of messages, Mr. Speaker, the American people need to hear,
this is November 5, 2015. It was November 5, 2009, when a major in the
United States Army at Fort Hood, Texas, killed Americans.
He had given plenty of warning signs that he was a ticking time bomb
who was going to kill Americans, particularly American soldiers,
especially if he were ordered to go overseas because he would much
prefer to kill American soldiers than he would go overseas and risk
killing a fellow Muslim.
Having heard about people in the United States Army, as I was in for
4 years, who had to deal with Major Hasan, it is appalling that
political correctness led to this man's being allowed to remain in the
military, ever being promoted, and being assigned to counsel troubled
soldiers. Incredible. But political correctness has become more and
more prominent.
It was November 5, 2009. President Obama had been in office since
January of that year. Major Hasan had been in the military during the
Bush administration. He should never have been promoted.
There were warning signs that we heard about after the fact, but
nobody wanted to be the one to stand up and say: ``This man is a
threat. He is a radical Islamist. He is a threat not only to the good
order and discipline of the United States military, he is a threat to
the very lives of our military members.''
Mr. Speaker, our military let those victims down at Fort Hood, Texas,
before the shooting ever occurred. That is almost unbearable. But what
becomes
[[Page H8146]]
unbearable is the fact that 6 years later victims of Major Hasan who
are still alive are still being mistreated by this administration.
An article by Jacob Brooks and J.C. Jones in the Killeen Daily Herald
today in the paper said: ``Six years after the November 5, 2009,
shooting at Fort Hood, at least one victim is still fighting for
overdue benefits. Former Fort Hood Staff Sergeant Alonzo Lunsford, Jr.,
said pain, betrayal, disrespect, and patriotism all come to mind when
he thinks about that tragic day. He said, 'It is a lot. It is really a
lot that goes through my head.'''
He was shot seven times by Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist who
opened fire on unsuspecting fellow soldiers at a Fort Hood medical
processing building for deploying soldiers.
Six years later, the building has been torn down. Many of the
soldiers who were there have since moved on, are either no longer in
the Army or stationed elsewhere.
Hasan, an Army major at the time of the shooting, was found guilty of
killing 12 soldiers and 1 civilian on August 23, 2013, following a 12-
day court martial at Fort Hood. Days later he was sentenced to die and
is currently on death row at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, awaiting
automatic appeals.
Mr. Speaker, it took Congress battling and finally putting language
in a bill that the Army and the Defense Department finally could not
ignore that finally put enough pressure on the Army to do the right
thing by these victims, and that is--for Heaven's sake, they were
victims of an attack in the war against America by radical Islam.
As Muslim friends in the Middle East, leaders in the Middle East who
are Muslims, have asked on different visits I have had in the Middle
East: Why is it that this administration does not understand radical
Islamists, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, is at war with the
United States? You keep helping the people who are at war with you, the
Muslim Brotherhood.
They recognize it all over the Middle East. Muslims over there
scratch their heads--moderate Muslims--and wonder what is wrong with
America.
I met a number of the survivors of the shooting 6 years ago today
when the Purple Hearts were finally awarded. A number of us were there
from Congress because it was an important day and they needed to know
Members of Congress do care.
So we were there as representatives of this body and all of those
within it who recognize the loss and the sacrifice occurred at the
hands of someone who is at war with the United States, a part of the
bigger radical Islamist movement.
It is rather ironic that, as we think about and talk about the
violations of the Iran treaty--yes, it is a treaty, despite the
Senate's unwillingness to call it what it is and the administration
obviously won't call it what it is--but the violations of the Iran
treaty by Iran are still resulting in this administration's sending
billions and billions and billions and billions of dollars to people
who want to kill us and to eliminate our way of life.
Yet, this same administration that is sending billions and billions
and billions of dollars to our enemy can't scrape together mere
hundreds of dollars to send to someone like Staff Sergeant Alonzo
Lunsford.
The article says he is now in North Carolina. I was impressed when I
met him. He seems to be a very sharp man, a patriot, someone who cares
about America. But like many of the victims, the wounds go even deeper
than the shots that were fired. In his case, seven times he was shot.
Oh, what a horrible day.
And, yet, this administration becomes accomplices to the after-the-
crime episode and damage by still refusing to acknowledge it for what
it was and pay these patriotic servicemembers the money they have
coming as people who were wounded in the line of duty.
It is ridiculous that this administration will send billions and
billions to our enemies who have already said that, with all the
billions Obama is going to make sure that we get, we are going to be
able to finance more, help Hamas more, help Hezbollah more. We are
going to be able to help those who kill Americans.
What does the administration do? They want to make sure that nothing
gets in the way of their sending money to people that want to kill
Americans and people who have killed Americans.
A report out just this week indicates that Iran may be responsible
for at least 12 percent of the Americans killed in Iraq. I can't help
but think, based on those I have talked to in trips to Iraq and those
who have researched even further, that when we get to the bottom line,
it will likely be a lot more than 12 percent.
But even so, the country, the radical Islamist leaders in charge, are
guilty of killing Americans, and this administration rewards them by
sending them money and, whether it is intentional or sheer intentional
neglect, refuses to acknowledge the patriotism and the act of war
against our members of the United States Army and the United States
military and the one civilian that was killed, refuses to acknowledge
and adequately appreciate those patriots that were killed or wounded in
the line of duty in an act of war by Major Nidal Hasan.
So, Mr. Speaker, the question arises: If this administration, either
through neglect or intent, is so calloused and uncaring towards its own
military members, then what is going on now that is going to result in
future Americans, military members, being killed? How many more Major
Nidal Hasans are there in the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines?
God, I hope and pray that people like Nidal Hasan are not still being
promoted because nobody wants to--in this administration, under this
administration, under this Commander in Chief--rise up and say: This
guy is giving all the indications of being a radical Islamist that will
one day explode and kill Americans.
Mr. Speaker, we have seen record numbers of generals--officers with
stars on their epaulets--being fired. Personally, I recognize Edward
Snowden to be a traitor. I have tried felony cases, including death
penalty cases.
Coupled with my experience here in Congress of trying to advise and
help whistle-blowers and having seen this administration turn against
whistle-blowers, use their own department they work in to destroy their
careers, use the Department of Justice to harass them, and if it is
somebody that has very damaging evidence about wrongdoing by this
administration, then they will convene a grand jury to investigate and
harass, never mind that it drives a spouse to the hospital near
breakdown, never mind the damage that it does to those patriotic
whistle-blowers who just want the government to do the right thing in
all things.
I have to recognize, if I were sentencing Edward Snowden for his
treason, that in this administration someone that were to come forth--
if Edward Snowden had done this and come before superiors in this
administration, he would likely have been destroyed, a grand jury
convened, attempts to put him in jail, attempts to destroy his
evidence.
That would have to be taken as evidence in mitigation of whatever the
sentence was for the treason because, under this administration, I have
struggled with people who wanted to get the truth out.
Where do you go? Eric Holder, as Attorney General, was not going to
help a whistle-blower if they had information that was damaging to the
administration. No. He was the head of the largest criminal defense
firm in America defending the actions in this administration and going
after and trying to destroy anybody who came forth with damaging
evidence, particularly if it could have come before the election in
2012.
Loretta Lynch will always be a blot on the reputation of the United
States Senate because she made clear she thought that the things Eric
Holder did in violation of the Constitution, in contempt of Congress,
the disingenuity and dishonesty, were okay in her book, and they
confirmed her anyway. So the indications are things haven't gotten any
better than they were.
{time} 1345
What do you do if you are a patriotic whistleblower in this
administration and you want to out Nidal Hasan, you want to come
forward with documentation that shows this administration has acted
inappropriately? It has been
[[Page H8147]]
made clear to people, you raise your head up to try to speak up and
speak truth, then we will make you rue the day you ever worked for the
government.
We won't help with mere hundreds of dollars to American patriots who
were wounded in an act of war, and, obviously, 13 killed in an act of
war by radical Islamists. We won't even call radical Islam what
moderate Muslims in the Middle East recognize that it is. And a man of
great courage I think will end up being recognized as one of the great
leaders in the Middle East of any age. President el-Sisi gets the back
of the hand most of the time from this administration. When he has had
the courage to stand up to imams in a room, looking them in the eye,
and say: It is time to take back our religion from the radicals.
Because of his courage, because of his recognizing the threat that
radical Islam is, not only to Christians and Jews, but to moderate
Muslims, then there is no doubt there are people that want to kill him,
when this administration ought to be doing everything they can to help
them.
I was asked by Egyptian leaders: Does your President not understand
that the Apache helicopters that he promised the Muslim Brother Morsi
that he withheld for so long, that we used those to keep the Suez Canal
open, does he not want the Suez Canal open? Does President Obama not
care? Well, that would certainly be the indication if you look at the
actions of his administration.
When I was in Egypt in September, people who desperately want to be
friends with the United States, they yearn for freedom, they yearn for
a free Egypt, free of radical Islam, even though they are Muslims
themselves, they want to be friends with freedom-loving Americans, and
yet with dozens and dozens and dozens of leaders from countries around
the world, including Russia, top leaders from countries around the
world, being there to note the incredible historic event in world
history when Egypt, after having gotten rid of the radical Islamist
Muslim Brother Morsi, who was refusing to keep his conduct within the
requirements of their Constitution, was removed after the biggest
peaceful demonstration in the history of the world. Over 30 million
people are said to have gone to the streets to demand his removal.
After Morsi is removed, people of vision like el-Sisi took over and
they dug another lane to the one Suez Canal, so there are two lanes for
a big part of it there. That was a historic day in June. The people of
Egypt should have been lauded by all of those in this administration.
Yet, not only did this administration not care to recognize the great
historic fete of Egypt struggling as it is to achieve greatness once
again, they didn't even send anybody from Washington. My friend Darrell
Issa went. Congress was represented.
I was not allowed to go, of course, because Speaker Boehner wasn't
allowing people like me who spoke up for what we believe is right to
travel. And, according to his staff, Speaker Boehner saw taxpayer-
funded travel as a reward for people that apparently voted like he
wanted them to, which kind of sounds like it would be a crime.
But, nonetheless, we were represented. Congress was represented
there, but not the administration. Leaders from around the world were
there. Not this administration.
It is time to recognize the good Muslims, the moderate Muslims in the
world, with whom we can be friends, who want to be our friends, who
want to work with us, and recognize those, like the Muslim Brotherhood,
who want to destroy our way of life. And it is time to stop the
political correctness that got 13 people killed at Fort Hood 6 years
ago today and got so many more wounded.
Since this administration doesn't want to properly recognize efforts
to keep the Middle East peaceful and out of the hands of radical
Islamists, like the Muslim Brotherhood, well, we had the Iran treaty
that this administration pushed and the Senate refused to take up and
vote on as a treaty.
The Corker bill clearly didn't apply because the Iranian treaty did
include terms about ballistic missiles, about weapons buying, about
release of money under the sanctions. It did change the terms of the
nonproliferation treaty. It was clearly a treaty.
It really will be another blot on the Senate's reputation that they
did not stop that. By taking a vote on ratification, it wouldn't have
gotten the two-thirds required. And then we could have prevented the
$100 billion plus--we are told $100 billion or so each year
thereafter--that will be going to a country that, according to this
news this week, where `` `Death to America' Stands Despite the Nuclear
Deal.'' This report from AFP, dated November 2, from Tehran, says,
``the Islamic Republic will not abandon the slogan of `Death to
America' despite its July nuclear accord with world powers.
``The martyr-nurturing nation of Iran is not at all prepared to
abandoned the slogan of `Death to America' under the pretext of a
nuclear agreement,'' 192 members of Iran's 290-seat parliament said in
a statement carried by state news agency IRNA.
``They said the slogan, chanted at the weekly Friday prayers in
mosques and at protests, had `turned into the symbol of the Islamic
republic and all struggling nations.' ''
So let's look, Mr. Speaker, at what has occurred since the Iran
treaty that was not ratified was placed into being by this
administration and by the Senate looking the other way.
Well, they have had ballistic missile tests. They have had joint
military operations with Russia and Syria.
Those certainly violate the terms of the Iran deal.
They have had open violations of international travel bans. We have
had a cyber attack from there. We have had an arrest of a U.S.
resident, Nazar Zaka. ``Death to America'' is still their chant.
And yet here is this story from October 21 by Reuters. It says:
``The United States, Britain, France and Germany called on Wednesday
for the United Nations Security Council's Iran sanctions committee to
take action over a missile test by Tehran that they said violated a
U.N. ban.
``In a letter containing details on the launch, they said the
ballistic missile was `inherently capable of delivering a nuclear
weapon.'
``The letter, seen by Reuters, was sent to the committee after the
United States raised the issue in the 15-member Security Council.
`` `We trust that this information will assist the Committee in its
responsibility to examine and take appropriate action in response to
violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions,' they wrote.''
``Diplomats have said it was possible for the sanctions committee to
blacklist additional Iranian individuals or entities if it determined
that the missile launch had breached the U.N. ban. However, they said
Russia and China, which have opposed the sanctions on Iran's missile
program, might block any such moves.
`` `The United States will continue to press the Security Council to
respond effectively to any future violations . . . Full and robust
enforcement of all relevant U.N. measures is and will remain critical,'
U.S. ambassador of the United Nations Samantha Power said in a
statement on Wednesday.''
Now, the reason that the United States has sent this letter,
participated in it, asking the U.N. to take appropriate action, is
because this administration is gutless to do what needs to be done. You
have Iran, it has been confirmed, that killed so many hundreds
responsible for the death of so many Americans. And this administration
struck a bad deal with them that could never get two-thirds of the
Senate to ratify it, so we just act like it is a treaty that is
ratified, even though it isn't.
But it is gutless to stand up to Iran and say: You violated the deal.
We are not going to allow $100 billion to $150 billion to go to you
while you continue to say ``death to America''; you continue to have
ballistic missile tests; you continue to have joint operations, in
violation of our deal, with Russia and Syria; you continue in open
violation of international travel bans; you continue to attack us or
have cyber attacks from your country; and you continue to stir up
violence against the United States. You are not getting any money.
How about giving just a little bit of that $100 billion to the
victims of Nidal Hasan? How about giving it to the victims of radical
Islamist violence? How
[[Page H8148]]
about giving it to the victims of over 400 days in captivity in Iran
under the Ayatollah Khamenei's leadership?
This administration has got to act. This is outrageous.
And then we have an International Business Times report, ``Iranian
Airline Violates Terms of Nuclear Deal By Purchasing Planes To Use In
Syrian War.'' This says:
``One of Iran's commercial airlines last week bought a UK-
manufactured jet with the aim of using it to deliver Iranian soldiers
and weapons to Syria . . . The purchase of the aircraft by an Iranian
concern represents a clear violation of the deal brokered by the
administration of U.S. President Barack Obama.''
It is outrageous. The Iran deal needs to be brought to an end. No
more money needs to go to Iran. No money for killers, for terrorists,
but money to the victims in our United States military.
With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________