[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 165 (Thursday, November 5, 2015)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1614]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. MARK TAKAI

                               of hawaii

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, November 5, 2015

  Mr. TAKAI. Mr. Speaker, on Wednesday, November 4, 2015, I was absent 
from the House due to illness. Due to my absence, I am not recorded on 
any legislative measures for the day. I would like to reflect how I 
would have voted had I been present for legislative business.
  Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 594, the 
Hartzler of Missouri Part B Amendment No. 37, as modified to Rules 
Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 595, the Rooney of Florida 
Part B Amendment No. 39 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 596, the DeSaulnier of 
California Part B Amendment No. 41 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 597, Providing for further 
consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 22).
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 598, Providing for further 
consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 22).
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 599, the DeSaulnier of 
California Part A Amendment No. 5 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 600, Hunter of California Part 
A Amendment No. 7 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``yea'' on Roll Call 601, the Denham of California 
Part A Amendment No. 8 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 602, the King of Iowa Part A 
Amendment No. 12 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 603, the Culberson of Texas 
Part A Amendment No. 14 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``yea'' on Roll Call 604, the Lewis of Georgia 
Part A Amendment No. 21 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 605, the Reichert of 
Washington Part A Amendment No. 26 to Rules Print 114-32.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 606, the DeSantis of Florida 
Part A Amendment No. 29.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 607, the Perry of Pennsylvania 
Part B Amendment No. 1 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 608, the Mulvaney of South 
Carolina Part B Amendment No. 2 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 609, the Mulvaney of South 
Carolina Part B Amendment No. 3 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 610, the Mulvaney of South 
Carolina Part B Amendment No. 4 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 611, the Mulvaney of South 
Carolina Part B Amendment No. 5 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 612, the Mulvaney of South 
Carolina Part B Amendment No. 6 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 613, the Rothfus of 
Pennsylvania Part B Amendment No. 7 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 614, the Royce of California 
Part B Amendment No. 8 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 615, the Schweikert of Arizona 
Part B Amendment No. 9 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 616, the Westmoreland of 
Georgia Part B Amendment No. 23 to Senate Amendment to the Text.
  I would have voted ``no'' on Roll Call 617, the Young of Iowa Part B 
Amendment No. 10 to Senate Amendment to the Text.

                          ____________________