[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 154 (Wednesday, October 21, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7367-S7368]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BENGHAZI SELECT COMMITTEE
Mr. REID. Mr. President, former First Lady, U.S. Senator of the State
of New York, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will testify before
the so-called Benghazi Select Committee tomorrow. In recent weeks, it
has become absolutely clear that this committee is nothing more than a
political hit job on Hillary Clinton.
I remember a program, ``Queen for a Day.'' I guess this is ``Speaker
for the Day.'' Republican Majority Leader of the House of
Representatives McCarthy--here is what he said on a TV show, radio
show, or whatever it was:
Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?
But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select
committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are
dropping.
Well, that is one reason he was Speaker for the day. There were other
reasons, of course. But he told the truth. He told the truth.
Congressman McCarthy isn't the only Republican to speak the truth about
this so-called committee. Last week Republican Congressman Richard
Hanna of New York said:
Sometimes the biggest sin you can commit in D.C. is to tell
the truth. This may not be politically correct, but I think
that there was a big part of this investigation that was
designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary
Clinton. After what Kevin McCarthy said, it's difficult to
accept at least a part of it was not true. I think that's the
way Washington works. But you'd like to expect more from a
committee that's spent millions of dollars and tons of time.
That is an understatement--about $5 million just for this one select
committee. There have been other hearings that have cost huge amounts
of taxpayer dollars. They are going again tomorrow, and they said be
ready for 8 hours--8 hours of interrogation. And that is what it is, an
interrogation.
These two quotes are from two House Republicans. Hanna from New York
is not a Democrat, he is a Republican.
The message is clear: The Benghazi Committee is a political
calculation meant to influence Presidential elections. And there is
more. Now we have found out that one of the Republican staffers on the
committee claims that he--the staffer--was unfairly fired because he
refused to unfairly target Secretary Clinton. But what else could be
expected from a committee whose sole purpose is to drag a Presidential
hopeful through the mud?
It is no secret that for the last 2 years, numerous Republican-
directed organizations with huge amounts of money have been targeting
Hillary Clinton--for more than 2 years--because they knew she would
likely run for President and they wanted to soften her up, just as
McCarthy said.
Look at the committee's record. In 17 months, committee Republicans
have held a whopping three hearings--in 17 months. Tomorrow's hearing
will be the first public hearing since January. It is October. October
is winding down. Instead, Republican Chairman Trey Gowdy and his
committee have focused millions of dollars and thousands of staff hours
on Hillary Clinton--and Hillary Clinton only. The committee has
interviewed or deposed eight Clinton campaign staffers. Yet Chairman
Gowdy has held only one hearing with an expert from the intelligence
community and not a single hearing with anyone from the Department of
Defense, which is clearly a key entity responding to attacks on our
diplomatic post. And what have they learned in all that time? Nothing.
A recent report by the Democrats on the Benghazi Select Committee
confirms that none of the witnesses they interviewed supported any of
the wild conspiracy theories regarding those attacks.
Contrast the Benghazi Committee with the work of the legally required
investigation of these attacks, the Accountability Review Board. This
independent review was overseen by respected leaders, Ambassador Thomas
Pickering, who is one of the great diplomats of our time, and ADM
Michael Mullen. They completed their work in less than 3 months, not 17
months. The review board immediately put out a hard-hitting report with
a series of recommendations to make sure an attack
[[Page S7368]]
like this doesn't happen someplace else around the world. And what was
Secretary Clinton's reaction to that report? She took responsibility
immediately and began to implement the recommendations from the
Accountability Review Board.
In summary, Republicans spent at least $5 million to attack Secretary
Clinton. On this one committee, this one select committee, they have
spent $4.7 or $4.8 million. Republicans have done little to investigate
the Benghazi attacks. And what little work House Republicans actually
did only reconfirmed the basic findings of all three of these previous
investigations.
House Republicans sadly have used the tragic deaths of four innocent
Americans and turned it into an appalling political farce. The very
notion that an official House committee was used as a political tool is
inexcusable. I would suggest that the chairman of that committee should
be ashamed of himself. It is even more disgraceful when nearly 5
million taxpayer dollars were spent on this political hit job.
Senate Democrats will continue to fight to get this sham of a
committee disbanded. Weeks ago, we sent a letter to Speaker Boehner
urging him to bring this disgraceful committee to an end, but, no, they
are plodding forward. Today, Senate Democrats sent a letter to the
Republican National Committee requesting that it reimburse the American
people for the Benghazi Committee's expenses. Why did we do that? It is
only fair since the so-called committee is clearly a Republican
political organization.
____________________