[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 140 (Monday, September 28, 2015)]
[House]
[Pages H6303-H6305]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CHRISTIANS UNDER ATTACK
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 6, 2015, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas (Mr.
Gohmert) for 30 minutes.
Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Speaker, I come before this honorable House with an
issue that has been rather heartbreaking for so many of us for so long
now:
In The Middle East, the cradle of Christianity, where it started
2,000 years ago based on the Judeo principles from thousands of years
before that, there has been a massive onslaught. Against Jews, it has
been going on for some time; but especially in the last several years,
it has become untenable for Christians.
In an article by Debra Heine, September 20, my sister's birthday, she
wrote about ``2,000 Years of Christian Civilization Destroyed on
Obama's Watch.''
It says this in the article: ``The Islamic State has managed to
destroy two thousand years of Christian civilizations in the Middle
East in just a couple of years, Lt. Col. Ralph Peters noted on `The
O'Reilly Factor' last week. And he placed the blame squarely on
President Obama's . . . policy.
``ISIS has been spreading across the Middle East like a plague of
locusts, and as they have spread, they have targeted religious
minorities, particularly Christians, for destruction. In Syria, tens of
thousands of Assyrian Christians have been attacked and displaced.
``They are forgotten refugees.''
Mr. Speaker, I have met with Christians and Christian leaders from
Syria, and the stories they tell and the horrors they talk about, the
inhumanity to man that is being inflicted upon Christians in that area
is just untenable. It is unconscionable. Women--talk about a war on
women. If they are Christian women, it is absolutely horrendous.
I ran into the same problem in meeting with family members in Nigeria
of girls that were kidnapped by radical Islamists, Boko Haram. That was
in Nigeria.
I would be interested to talk to the President of Togo tomorrow. I
have been to his country before. I have seen the poverty, and I have
seen the affliction.
But in the Middle East, Christians are not even allowed to be in the
area where the Apostle Paul walked. The Apostle Paul planted churches
where Christian missionaries were, along the times right after Jesus
resurrected. Right in the early days of the church, churches were
planted. And now, while the United States is said to be the sole
superpower, Christians are being persecuted in greater numbers around
the world than ever in history.
If there is a God who loves Christians, loves all people but has an
affinity for Jews and Christians, then there would have to be a price
for any nation that allows this to go on.
This article goes on: A Catholic priest who visited Kurdish Iraq last
fall described the wounded souls of the Christians who had taken refuge
there. They had been forced from their homes in northern Iraq in the
summer of 2014.
`` `Without question, we are talking about genocide here. Genocide is
not only when the people are killed, but also when the soul of a people
is destroyed. And that is what is happening in Iraq now,' said Fr.
Andrzej Halemba, head of Aid to the Church in Need's Middle East
section, said October 28. `It is the most tragic thing that I have ever
experienced.' ''
This is from the priest. The priest goes on: `` `I have seen people
who have been deeply wounded in their soul. In the various crises in
this world, I have often seen people who have lost everything. But in
Iraq, there are Christians who have had to leave everything and take
flight three or four times. They can see no light at the end of the
tunnel.'
``Last spring, hundreds of Assyrian Christians fled to Lebanon after
ISIS jihadists stormed their villages in Syria's northeastern province
of Hasakeh.
``Members of Lebanon's Assyrian community did their best to welcome
the new refugees, but the displacement had left them traumatized.
`` `The villages of Khabur are empty now, there is no one left except
some fighters,' lamented Chorbishop Yatron Koliana, as he oversaw the
distribution at his diocese.''
[[Page H6304]]
Mr. Speaker, this is tragic. Christian villages 2,000 years old,
destroyed. Nothing left but some people trying to fight for just the
ground that they are fighting on that once was their home.
`` `Our people have experienced a great tragedy in Syria' . . . `They
are depressed. Some of them have chronic illnesses. Their lives are
difficult.'
`` `How can we be comfortable living on aid?' asked 50-year-old
Simaan, who fled his village Tal Hormuz.
``He railed against what he called international indifference to the
plight of Assyrians under attack by ISIS in Syria and neighboring Iraq.
`` `The whole world, from the U.N. to the United States and Russia,
is responsible' . . . `They' ''--talking about ISIS--`` `have destroyed
our whole civilization . . . and the world is watching.' ''
{time} 2030
We hear so many sad stories. Christians are being persecuted on our
watch, and we are not talking enough about it. The President certainly
isn't. He tells us that we need to take tens or hundreds of thousands
of more Muslim refugees. What about the Christians and the massive
extermination of churches in the Middle East under this administration?
We get it. The Constitution gives the President wide authority and wide
latitude on foreign policy. Congress has some say because we can
appropriate or defund what the President is doing--if we have
leadership with courage to do that.
This article goes on: ``In July, 4,000 more Assyrian Christian
families were among the 120,000 people who fled Hasakah to escape ISIS
forces who had entered the city looking to carry out a mass ethno-
religious slaughter.
``Fleeing Muslim persecution, Christian refugees are often targeted
and persecuted anew by fleeing Muslim refugees.''
The International Business Times reported: ``Italian police have
arrested 15 Muslim immigrants in Palermo, for allegedly having thrown
Christian refugees off the rubber boat that was taking them to Italy
after a fight for `religious reasons,' according to media reports.
``Those arrested--from Mali, Guinea and Ivory Coast--were part of a
group of 100 that were rescued off the Libyan coast by the Italian
coast guard.
``The Archbishop of Canterbury, recently warned British Prime
Minister David Cameron that his government's refugee policy was
discriminating against Christians because Christians are not among the
refugees being helped in U.N. camps. They are not in the U.N. camps
because they fear persecution from radicalized Muslim refugees.
``The Most Reverend Justin Welby reportedly met the Prime Minister
earlier this month with concerns that Christians in Syria will be
largely excluded from the 20,000 refugees due to come to the U.K. over
the next 5 years.
``The government, in line with European Union policy, is committed to
taking in refugees from U.N. camps in Syria and neighboring countries.
It cannot discriminate in favor of any one religious group. But the
Archbishop has raised concerns that Christians have avoided refugee
camps because of fears of persecution from rogue Islamist groups
operating inside refugee camps.
``In a speech in the House of Lords last Monday, Archbishop Welby
said that, `within the camps there is significant intimidation and
radicalization, and many particularly of the Christian population who
have been forced to flee are unable to be in the camps.'
``He went on: `What is the government's policy of reaching out to
those who are not actually in the camps?' ''
Lord Carey, who wrote in the Telegraph about his concern of the
plight of Christians, wrote:
`` `The frustration for those of us who have been calling for
compassion for Syrian victims for many months is that the Christian
community is yet again left at the bottom of the heap.'
`` `Mr. Cameron's policy inadvertently discriminates against the very
Christian communities most victimized by the inhuman butchers of the
so-called Islamic State.'
`` `Christians are not to be found in the U.N. camps, because they
have been attacked and targeted by Islamists and driven from them. They
are seeking refuge in private homes, church buildings, and with
neighbors and family.'
``Refugees who want to come to the United States will also be
required to apply through the U.N.
`` `A combination of European cowardice and awful American foreign
policy has led to a mass Muslim migration that will affect the whole
world.' ''
``Lt. Col. Ralph Peters disagreed somewhat with that assessment.''
He said, `` `I think you were much, much too soft on President Obama
and a bit too hard on the E.U.' . . .`If America doesn't lead, it
doesn't happen.' ''
He went on to say: `` `Just look at a map of the Middle East . . . on
George W. Bush's last day in office. There is broad peace across the
Middle East and North Africa, Iraq was finally convalescing, and . . .
Obama promptly, to please his America-hating base, abandons Iraq, backs
the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, gets rid of Qaddafi without a plan for
what goes after, threatens Assad . . . then does nothing, doesn't
listen to the intelligence community when for years they are telling
him about the Islamic State coming--then tries to blame the
intelligence community, and launches feckless airstrikes. The
combination of his fecklessness and cowardice, his rhetorical bravado
and utter incompetence are responsible.' ''
He goes on: `` `No. Listen to this. Two thousand years of Christian
civilization destroyed on his watch . . . That's on Obama. When America
doesn't lead, nothing happens.' ''
Well, it is not just on President Obama. I am sure he is mainly
responsible for our foreign policy, but we need to stand up to the
President. When Iran is out there saying, as they have in the last
couple of weeks, that with the $100 billion, $150 billion that
President Obama is going to see to Iran getting quickly, and the
hundreds of billions of dollars that will flow in subsequent years,
they were already announcing they are going to increase their support
for Hamas and Hezbollah as they kill Americans, continue to kill
Christians, and continue to kill moderate Muslims who are not
radicalized, at what point is Congress responsible for not standing up
to the President?
Mr. Speaker, I would submit that one very important point has come,
and right now it is up to the United States Senate to have a backbone
on behalf of the millions that stand to be persecuted and killed by the
money that they are going to allow to go to Iran by failing to do what
they could to stop this world atrocity.
There is no question in reasonable, intelligent minds that the Iran
deal is a treaty. It is a treaty as anticipated by the Founders. It is
a treaty as referred to in the Constitution, article II, section 2,
second paragraph, and it requires a vote of two-thirds of the Senate
present to go along with it in order for it to be effective.
Yes, the Corker bill tried to amend the Constitution. Legislation
can't amend the Constitution. Once it is clear--as it is--that the Iran
deal is a treaty, then we need desperately to have people in the Senate
stand up--some of them have--make clear this is a treaty; it requires
two-thirds in order to approve it or it is not ratified, it is not
effective, and the President is not allowed to release the 100-plus
billion, $150 billion to Iran that will be used for atrocities,
especially toward America, toward Christians, toward moderate
nonradicalized Muslims, toward Jews, and toward Israel. There is a real
responsibility here. It may take courage--I am sure it will--for the
Senate to stand up and the Senate majority leader to stand up and say:
Sorry, Mr. President, the Iran deal is a treaty. We have listed in our
letter to the majority leader in the Senate some of the bases, it is
spelled out in our resolution that we filed and talked about here on
the floor, it is clearly a treaty.
The end of John Quincy Adams' oral argument that capped a couple of
days of oral argument in the case can be found online. He was afraid
that if he did not do an adequate job as a lawyer, those Africans that
he was representing that had been captured by other Africans and sold
into slavery, sent to the Caribbean, and then put on the Spanish ship
the Amistad, they were able to overtake and overpower the Spanish and
take charge of the ship. They landed in America. The lawsuit was over
whether or not they were free Africans or whether they were property of
the Spanish.
[[Page H6305]]
I can understand the fear that John Quincy Adams must have had as he
stood downstairs in the Old Supreme Court Chamber. One of the Justices
had died one night during oral argument, not while he was actually
arguing. That final day he knew if he didn't do an adequate job, his
clients would wear chains and their children would wear chains all
because he didn't do an adequate job as their lawyer.
So he finished his oral argument by calling the names of Justices of
the Supreme Court who had been on the Supreme Court but had passed
away. Chief Justice, Justices, he knew them. He called their names: The
Justice that started this case, where is he? Where are all these
Justices? Where is the Solicitor General that argued before me?
This is around 1821. This is in the late 1830s. He is now arguing in
the Supreme Court in their Chamber downstairs.
After going through all the Supreme Court Justices that had passed
away, he finishes basically by saying they have gone to meet their
Judge, and the biggest question is when they met their Maker, their
Judge, did they hear the words: ``Well done, good and faithful
servant?''
It is very clear, send a message to the Supreme Court. Think about
it, Justices. If you died tonight like the other Judge just died in the
last couple of nights and you go to meet your Maker, do you want the
last thing you did to be having sent wonderful African people out in
chains that they would wear and their children would wear--possibly
their children and their children--all because you didn't do the right
thing as a judge? He won the case, as well he should.
I can't help but wonder if John Quincy Adams were here today arguing
on behalf of Christian communities all over the Middle East that have
been destroyed, refugees that have been sent running, Jews that can no
longer populate the area because of threats and violence upon them, and
he saw that the United States that he had been President of and was in
the House of Representatives after having been President, if he would
not be mortified, if he would not challenge us today: Do we want to
meet our Maker, our Judge, and we saw and heard about the plight of
Christians, Jews, and moderate Muslims around the Middle East and North
Africa just being slaughtered, women being raped and torn apart,
brutalized in unthinkable ways, and we turned a blind eye to that and
said that we are going to bring in massive numbers of refugees who are
Muslim, 72 percent of which are male, and we have been told by radicals
that they are going to make sure that there are people that want to
kill and destroy more Christians, more Jews, more of America, and we
are going to bring them in without proper vetting--because you can't
vet them properly--all while Christians, Jews, and moderate Muslims are
being slaughtered and overrun all through the Middle East as we are
credited with being the superpower in the world?
{time} 2045
Yet, also, these last few days, the U.N.--where we pay far more than
anybody even comes close to in order to keep it going as they continue
to become more and more anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli, and anti-American--
they entertain the largest supporter of terrorism in the world, the
leader of Iran. And he says this in part, the leader of Iran, the
President Rouhani:
If we did not have U.S. military invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq and
the United States' unwarranted support for the inhumane actions of the
Zionist regime against the oppressed nation of Palestine, today the
terrorists would not have an excuse for the justification of their
crimes.
I am taking this from an article by Julian Hattem, 9-28-15, which is
interesting. We have heard that throughout the United States, if we
just hadn't gone into Iraq, if we hadn't gone into Afghanistan, if we
hadn't gone into Afghanistan with the 300 Americans that we embedded--
about 300--we embedded and let the Afghans destroy the Taliban by
February of 2002, then we became an overwhelming occupying force in
Afghanistan--but at least by February of 2002, if we hadn't gone in and
helped them, the Taliban would still be completely controlling
Afghanistan. That is the way it is.
Now, we went astray when we became occupiers, and this President has
only tripled the number of deaths in Afghanistan, even though the war
is supposedly over. Over tripled the number of American deaths, even
though the real war was during President Bush, because of this
President's rules of engagement and disastrous foreign policy.
But think about it. This is the head, the President of Iran. He is
telling the UN and the world that, if it weren't for the United States'
invasion in Afghanistan and in Iraq, there wouldn't be any American
terrorists.
Mr. Speaker, why in the world should the U.N. listen to a man that is
this big a liar or is this stupid? Because you don't have to be all
that bright to understand September 11 of 2001 happened before we sent
300 or so into Afghanistan to help them destroy the Taliban and before
we went in and took out a brutal dictator in Iraq.
In fact, the planning of 9-11-2001 happened during the Clinton
administration on President Clinton's watch. And for people that are
fools or liars like Rouhani and they don't know or are just lying about
it, during the Clinton administration, President Clinton's policies
were to run and help persecuted Muslims whenever we found them around
the world.
And while we were busy helping Muslims, Western Asia, Eastern Europe,
wherever we could help them, they were planning the attack on New York
City and Washington, D.C., and hoping to wipe out the entire American
government here in Washington, D.C. And but for the heroic act of
people on a plane that took it down in Pennsylvania, they may well
have.
We don't need to hear any of these lies about, oh, if America just
hadn't invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, regardless of whether you agree
with what President Bush ordered with Iraq, the fact is 9/11 was a
terrorist attack before and so was the attack on the USS Cole and so
were the attacks on our embassies around the world during the 1990s and
so was the first World Trade Center attack in 1993 that apparently had
some planning back during the former President Bush's administration.
And that was an administration that stopped a brutal dictator, Saddam
Hussein, who had raided another Muslim country, and we went in and
helped Kuwait get their country back. We went to help the Muslims. And
how do they reward us? To plan an attack to try to take down the World
Trade Centers in '93.
It is very clear Christianity, Judaism, Israel, all were under attack
and so was America. And our enemies can't believe how stupid Americans
are because we are going to reward the biggest supporter of terrorism
in the world--Iran--with $100 to $150 billion that they are already
saying they are going to use to help Hamas and Hezbollah kill more
Christians, more Jews, help wipe out Israel, help the attack against
the Great Satan, the United States.
Mr. Speaker, it is time for people in the United States Government to
stand up and help correct the wayward policies of this administration.
We start by having the United States Senate in one voice say the
Iranian deal is a treaty and we are taking a vote on it and cloture is
set aside with 51 votes.
And they won't get the two-thirds to ratify it. It will not become
effective against the United States. And thank God we will then have
stopped the continued persecution of Christians, moderate Muslims,
Jews, Israelis, and the United States, instead of rewarding them and
helping them take us out.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair reminds Members to avoid engaging
in personalities toward the President.
____________________