[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 128 (Tuesday, September 8, 2015)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1231-E1232]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. SANDER M. LEVIN

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                       Tuesday, September 8, 2015

  Mr. LEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I was absent on July 28 and July 29 on 
account of official business at the Trans-Pacific Partnership talks. 
Had I been present, I would have voted as follows:
  On Roll Call 473, I would have voted No (Young amendment to the 
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).
  On Roll Call 474, I would have voted No (Smith amendment to the 
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).
  On Roll Call 475, I would have voted Aye (Johnson amendment to the 
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).
  On Roll Call 476, I would have voted Aye (Capps amendment to the 
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).
  On Roll Call 477, I would have voted Aye (Cicilline amendment to the 
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).
  On Roll Call 478, I would have voted Aye (Cicilline/Jackson-Lee 
amendment to the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny 
Act).
  On Roll Call 479, I would have voted Aye (Nadler amendment to the 
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).
  On Roll Call 480, I would have voted Aye (Pocan/Moore amendment to 
the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).
  On Roll Call 481, I would have voted Aye (Motion to Recommit the 
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).
  On Roll Call 482, I would have voted No (Final passage of the 
Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act).

[[Page E1232]]

  On Roll Call 483, I would have voted No (Ordering the previous 
question on the Rule for H.R. 1994 and H.R. 3236).
  On Roll Call 484, I would have voted No (Rule for H.R. 1994 and H.R. 
3236).
  On Roll Call 485, I would have voted Aye (Passage of the First 
Responder Anthrax Preparedness Act).
  On Roll Call 486, I would have voted Aye (Passage of the Surface 
Transportation and Veterans Health Care Choice Improvement Act).
  On Roll Call 487, I would have voted Aye (Takano amendment to the VA 
Accountability Act of 2015).
  On Roll Call 488, I would have voted Aye (Motion to recommit the VA 
Accountability Act of 2015).
  On Roll Call 489, I would have voted No (Final passage of the VA 
Accountability Act of 2015).

                          ____________________