[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 116 (Thursday, July 23, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Page S5528]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      By Mr. HOEVEN (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. 
        Grassley, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Thune, Mr. Brown, Mr. Enzi, and 
        Mr. Rounds):
  S. 1844. A bill to amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to 
provide for voluntary country of origin labeling for beef, pork, and 
chicken; to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
  Mr. HOEVEN. Mr. President, today I filed, along with a bipartisan 
group of cosponsors, the Voluntary Country of Origin Labeling and Trade 
Enhancement Act of 2015. I wish to thank the cosponsors on the 
legislation. The lead cosponsor on the Democratic side is Senator 
Debbie Stabenow, ranking member on the Senate Agriculture Committee. 
Also joining us in this bipartisan group are Senator John Thune from 
South Dakota, another member of the agriculture committee, Senator Amy 
Klobuchar, Senator Chuck Grassley, Senator Heidi Heitkamp, Senator Mike 
Enzi, and Senator Sherrod Brown. With the exception of Senator Enzi, 
all of the cosponsors are members of our agriculture committee.
  What we are trying to do is come up with a solution to the country-
of-origin labeling issue. This is an issue that has been in a WTO court 
for some time and involves the United States, Canada, and Mexico, our 
very good trading partners. Essentially what we are working to do is to 
find a solution that addresses the WTO issues as far as country-of-
origin labeling in a way that makes sure that we are WTO compliant so 
that there are no duties or tariffs that can be levied against any of 
our agricultural exports or any other exports. At the same time, for 
those who want to use country-of-origin labeling on a voluntary basis, 
they are able to do so. That would preserve what is known as the 
``Grade A'' label, which simply means born, raised, and slaughtered or 
processed in the United States. So for beef, pork, and chicken, if it 
is born and raised and processed in the United States, one can still 
use that ``Grade A'' label, but it is a voluntary program, it is not a 
mandatory program. We do that purposely so that we meet the WTO 
requirements. I have spoken with the U.S. Trade Representative's office 
about that issue, which I will go into in just a minute.

  What we have done is we have simply taken the House legislation--
sponsored by the Agriculture Committee chairman in the House, 
Representative Mike Conaway, which passed in the House--essentially, we 
take the same bill, the same language as far as repealing mandatory 
COOL. So we repeal mandatory COOL, which puts us in compliance with 
what the WTO is asking for, then we simply add some language that 
allows for a voluntary program, so that for processors, marketers, and 
producers that want to participate in a voluntary program, they can. If 
they believe consumers want to know, then they have that opportunity to 
provide their product with the ``Grade A'' label on a voluntary basis. 
That is reasonable because that is what Canada does. Canada has a 
voluntary program. It is called their ``Product of Canada'' label. So 
all we are doing is what Canada does. We repeal the mandatory program 
and we put in place a voluntary program just as our good friends and 
neighbors do in Canada.
  When I spoke with the U.S. Trade Representative about this issue, 
essentially what they said is whether we repeal mandatory COOL by 
itself or repeal mandatory COOL and have a voluntary program, 
essentially we are in the same position vis-a-vis meeting the WTO 
requirements.
  So this is really an effort to build bipartisan support for a 
solution to the COOL issue, which has been a challenging issue. This is 
an issue we worked on on the farm bill. I was one of the conferees on 
the conference committee, and COOL and some of the other issues were 
some of the last--dairy, for example--issues we were able to resolve in 
finally getting an agreement on a farm bill.
  Again, this is an effort in a practical way to bring people together 
on both sides of the issue to solve the problem. We make sure we are 
WTO compliant. Then, on a voluntary basis, there is the option for 
people to label as they want to. We work to create enough bipartisan 
support in this body so we can deal with the issue now, so we can 
resolve the issue now and pass this legislation and then get it to 
conference with the House and have a resolution before the end of this 
month and before the August recess so that this issue is taken care of.
  I look forward to working with everybody involved on both sides of 
the aisle, including our esteemed chairman of the Agriculture 
Committee, Senator Roberts. I appreciate all the time we have spent 
working together on this issue. I look forward to working with Members 
on both sides of the aisle, both on the Agriculture Committee and 
everyone else, to craft a solution, advance it through this body, and 
get it to conference with the House.
  As I said, I have spoken with Chairman Conaway, the Agriculture 
Committee chairman in the House. We have a good relationship, and we 
had a good dialogue about the sooner we get to work together to resolve 
this, the better, and we look forward to that.
  Again, I ask my colleagues to join with us, our bipartisan group, in 
a bipartisan way. Let's get this done and make sure we not only have 
addressed the issue with the World Trade Organization court so there 
are no duties but also make sure we have put forward a solution that 
works for the American consumer and for the American agriculture 
industry, that on a voluntary basis gives them the opportunity to 
provide country-of-origin labeling as well as solving the WTO 
challenge.
                                 ______