[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 98 (Thursday, June 18, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4275-S4276]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CLOTURE MOTION
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I understand the Democratic leader
would like to make some remarks.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The minority leader.
Mr. REID. To respond to the majority leader, I have nothing to say
until I hear what he has to say.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, America asks a lot of the men and women
of its voluntary military force: to undertake dangerous missions in
far-off lands, to spend months and years away from their families, and
always to sacrifice so that we might live in freedom.
These brave men and women do it all without reservation. They ask
precious little in return, save for the resources they need to do the
job and the support they need to look after their families. It is the
least we can do, to provide for them. We just voted 71 to 25 for a bill
that promises a lot of things for our men and women.
It would be very cruel indeed for any Senator who just made that
promise to turn around now and block the rest of us from fulfilling the
pledge to our troops. Passing the legislation before us is a way to
fulfill the promise we just made, 71 to 25. That is why nearly every
Democrat voted to pass it in committee, 27 to 3. That is why Democrats
have hailed this bill as a win-win-win and a victory for each of their
States.
They know it gives President Obama the same level of funding he asked
for. They know it adheres to a bipartisan spending level that both
parties agreed to, that President Obama signed into law, and that
President Obama campaigned on in the last Presidential election.
Now our friends face a choice.
Option 1: Allow the promise just made to our troops to be fulfilled
by voting for a bill they can't stop praising.
Option 2: Break the promise they just made by killing a bill they
claim to love, all in the service of some unrelated and completely
incomprehensible partisan plan.
It is the road of bipartisanship and support for our troops that
brought us this far. We shouldn't let partisan politics trip us up now.
We don't have to--not if commonsense Democrats continue to prioritize
pay raises and medical care for our troops over some unrelated gambit
to funnel more cash to bureaucracies such as the IRS and the EPA.
I will just leave my colleagues with something one of our Democratic
friends said of men and women in the military. Here is what he had to
say: ``Just as we called on them to protect us, they are calling on us
to provide them with the resources they need. . . .''
They are. Senators just promised they would, 71 to 25. They just made
the promise. So now they shouldn't block us from fulfilling that
promise by preventing us from getting on the Defense appropriations
measure.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The minority leader.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, the bill that just passed the Senate, the
Defense authorization bill, has 52 Republicans voting to fix
sequestration. Only 2 voted against it. We are all in favor of fixing
the sequester.
My friend, the Republican leader, is talking in a dreamland.
Ash Carter, the Secretary of Defense, is a very good man. We are so
fortunate
[[Page S4276]]
that he has dedicated his life to public service. He is a scientist and
has worked for the defense establishment for a while in public service.
He, the Secretary of Defense, says this bill my friend talks about is a
bad bill. It doesn't help the military. This funny funding that is in
this bill is not good. The chairman of the Armed Services Committee was
on the floor this morning talking about that.
It is important that we solve the sequester problem. It is not good,
but we cannot, and we should not, fix one part of our government and
not the other part.
We support the Pentagon. We support the troops. Of course we do. But
as the Secretary of Defense has so implored us, don't do this to the
military. To have a secure nation involves more than the people in the
armed services. The people in the armed services, while their families
are at home, want them to be protected as they travel to an airport.
The TSA needs to be funded, the FBI needs to be funded, the Drug
Enforcement Administration needs to be funded, Homeland Security needs
to be funded, and in the process, we need to fund education properly.
We need to fund research for health. We need to make sure the National
Institutes of Health are not whacked again with sequestration the way
they were the first time. They lost $1.6 billion. They have never
recovered from that. They have never gotten their money back. Do we
want to give them another sequestration? Of course we don't.
We have until this fiscal year ends in the fall to work this out, and
that is what we should do. We are legislators. I agree with the 52
Republicans who said we should fix sequestration, but this bill only
fixes sequestration for the Department of Defense.
Let's sit down and do what we, as legislators, are supposed to do.
Legislation is the art of compromise. We are not going to get
everything we want, but the Republicans shouldn't get everything they
want, and we should not fund this government by using funny money for
defense and using the really unfunny money on the rest of the
government. It is unfair, and above all the Republican Party, which
used to stand for fiscal responsibility, should get fiscally
responsible and help us work this out.
We are ready and willing at any time to sit down and work through
this, and we need to start that now.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, as the Democratic leader reminded me,
on a virtually daily basis for 8 years, the majority leader always gets
the last word.
Here is the issue, I say to my friends on the other side: You just
voted for the troops. And now you are going to vote against them? Are
you going to vote against the troops right after you voted for the
troops? That is the fundamental question before us in deciding whether
to go to the Defense appropriations measure.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The minority leader.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I know my friend gets the last word, and I
am looking forward to his last word. However, the logic of my friend is
illogical. We stand on our record, and we will continue in that
fashion.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Pursuant to rule XXII, the Chair lays before
the Senate the pending cloture motion, which the clerk will state.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate,
do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to
proceed to H.R. 2685, an act making appropriations for the
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September
30, 2016, and for other purposes.
Mitch McConnell, John Cornyn, James Lankford, Roger F.
Wicker, John Barrasso, Thom Tillis, Steve Daines, Tom
Cotton, Kelly Ayotte, Lindsey Graham, John McCain, John
Thune, Jerry Moran, Richard C. Shelby, Daniel Coats,
Jeff Flake, Rob Portman.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. By unanimous consent, the mandatory quorum
call has been waived.
The question is, Is it the sense of the Senate that debate on the
motion to proceed to H.R. 2685, an act making appropriations for the
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016,
and for other purposes, shall be brought to a close?
The yeas and nays are mandatory under the rule.
The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk called the roll.
Mr. CORNYN. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the
Senator from Indiana (Mr. Coats), the Senator from South Carolina (Mr.
Graham), the Senator from Utah (Mr. Lee), and the Senator from South
Carolina (Mr. Scott).
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Missouri (Mrs.
McCaskill) is necessarily absent.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber
desiring to vote?
The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 50, nays 45, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 216 Leg.]
YEAS--50
Alexander
Ayotte
Barrasso
Blunt
Boozman
Burr
Capito
Cassidy
Cochran
Collins
Corker
Cornyn
Cotton
Crapo
Cruz
Daines
Donnelly
Enzi
Ernst
Fischer
Flake
Gardner
Grassley
Hatch
Heller
Hoeven
Inhofe
Isakson
Johnson
Kirk
Lankford
McCain
Moran
Murkowski
Paul
Perdue
Portman
Risch
Roberts
Rounds
Rubio
Sasse
Sessions
Shelby
Sullivan
Thune
Tillis
Toomey
Vitter
Wicker
NAYS--45
Baldwin
Bennet
Blumenthal
Booker
Boxer
Brown
Cantwell
Cardin
Carper
Casey
Coons
Durbin
Feinstein
Franken
Gillibrand
Heinrich
Heitkamp
Hirono
Kaine
King
Klobuchar
Leahy
Manchin
Markey
McConnell
Menendez
Merkley
Mikulski
Murphy
Murray
Nelson
Peters
Reed
Reid
Sanders
Schatz
Schumer
Shaheen
Stabenow
Tester
Udall
Warner
Warren
Whitehouse
Wyden
NOT VOTING--5
Coats
Graham
Lee
McCaskill
Scott
The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote on the motion to invoke cloture
on the motion to proceed to H.R. 2685, the yeas are 50, the nays are
45.
Three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn not having voted
in the affirmative, the motion is rejected.
The majority leader.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I enter a motion to reconsider the
vote.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The motion is entered.
____________________