[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 10, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3982-S3984]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OBAMACARE
Mr. COATS. Mr. President, last week I chaired a hearing of the Joint
Economic Committee entitled ``Examining the Employment Effects of the
Affordable Care Act.'' The purpose of the hearing was to discuss how
the Affordable Care Act has affected the ability of Americans to earn
and do business, particularly for small businessmen.
The impact of the Affordable Care Act--better known as ObamaCare--is
particularly important to discuss at this point this year now that the
delayed employer provisions are in effect and employers are feeling the
pinch. Frankly, ``pinch'' is the wrong word; they are feeling the
hammer blow of the burdens imposed on them, both from regulatory and a
tax standpoint that are directly affecting their ability to grow, to
provide jobs, and to expand their business.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the law, ObamaCare,
will reduce the total number of hours worked by as much as 2 percent
from the years 2017 to 2024.
People said: Two percent--is that a big deal?
Yes, it is a big deal. It is equal to 2.5 million full-time-
equivalent jobs--for workers who are looking for those jobs.
The CBO reasoned that this would result from new taxes embedded
throughout the ObamaCare program--not talked about when this was
passed. In fact, nothing was talked about that was passed in terms of
the way people could understand it, as acknowledged by the former head
of the House of Representatives.
With new taxes and measures that employers will face and the
financial benefits that some will be imposed, the CBO estimates a 1-
percent reduction in total pay over the same timeframe as a result of
ObamaCare.
This was something that was sold to the American people without
credibility. All the promises that were made, some so defiantly made by
the President. He said: Take my word for it, period, not one penny of
increase in your premium cost. Keep your doctor. If you like your
doctor, keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, keep your
health care plan. What a misrepresentation of the bill this has been.
I have received many stories in my office, by email, by regular mail,
by phone calls with descriptions of the impact this law has had and the
broken promises that have imposed higher premiums, higher copays,
higher deductibles, and higher costs for the American people. So we
anxiously
[[Page S3983]]
await the decision of the Supreme Court, which will be coming in
several weeks or less, to see where we go.
I want to take this opportunity to share just one story of one
company and the head of that company and what that one small company--
providing needed and good jobs for Hoosiers in my State--has had to
endure under this particular law. I think this was expressed so well by
the head of that company. His name is Dr. Joseph Sergio, president of
the Sergio corporation.
He came before our committee, and we heard some of the most clear and
defined discussion of the impact, the personal impact on families and
workers of the ObamaCare act and what it has done to his small
business, which I think is representative of millions of small
businesses across the country.
Dr. Sergio is a first-generation American citizen whose family
business was founded 36 years ago. His father was an Italian immigrant
who came to America to realize the American dream, and he did. Dr.
Sergio expanded his father's business, which includes First Response--a
national award-winning disaster restoration company, involved in every
major hurricane and storm disaster in recent history, with awards for
their performance and how effectively and efficiently they brought
response to people who needed it following these disasters--and Polar
Clean--another company he has which is an environmentally friendly dry
ice blast cleaning industrial service. We talk about going green. We
talk about caring about our environment. This is a revolutionary way of
cleaning any number of factories, businesses, energy companies, and so
forth with a new environmentally friendly process.
Here is what Dr. Sergio said to me: ``As a small business, we have
felt the profound imposition of the Affordable Care Act, or as it is
known among many small business entrepreneurs, the Unaffordable Care
Act.''
As a small business owner, Dr. Sergio said to be successful he needed
to be able to accurately identify, forecast, and control expenses in
order to create profits which would then be reinvested in his growing
business. That means new jobs and new opportunity. That, he said, is
where the frustration with ObamaCare begins.
Now, look, what Dr. Sergio outlined is economics 101. It is the first
thing you learn in an economics class or the first thing your parents
tell you: To be successful--and I wish this applied to the Federal
Government--you have to control your costs, you have to identify and
forecast what your expenses are going to be in the future and make sure
you can cover those. And only when you make a profit--not just seeking
neutrality here in the Federal Government--but only when you make a
profit in the business can you grow that business and put more people
back to work.
ObamaCare, Dr. Sergio said, has imposed a whole set of complications
and regulations on small business owners that obscures their ability to
do just that--to identify, forecast, and control expenses. This makes
it difficult to determine profits that are needed to increase employee
wages, expand research and development, and invest in new equipment.
For a company working in disaster response, all of this is important.
Of course, all of this is important for any company.
Dr. Sergio said his business has been forced to make major changes to
meet the requirements imposed by ObamaCare. They had to drop their
health care plan because it didn't meet the requirements of ObamaCare,
even though it had been worked out between the employer and the
employees and they were happy with their plan.
As a result, his employees and the company are paying more for an
inferior policy. He said:
Employees are now paying larger co-pays and larger
deductibles. Some are opting to pay the penalty rather than
absorb the high cost of ObamaCare.
This not only illustrates how ObamaCare affects businesses but how it
directly affects families all across our Nation.
Small business owners are angry because ObamaCare promised to lower
costs for the average family by $2,500. That was another broken promise
from the White House. They said it would lower costs by an average of
$2,500. Rather, ObamaCare now has increased the price of insurance and
decreased the quality of affordable insurance.
In addition to the quality of insurance, the mandate has affected his
company's growth, said Dr. Sergio. Small business owners have a limited
amount of capital to spend on their labor pool--employees. The mandates
of ObamaCare have pushed spending over to the benefits side. This
limits the amount of day-to-day compensation increases a company can
provide.
This is not only demoralizing to the employee but frustrating to the
employer that is seeing capital going into an ObamaCare-compliant
benefits plan that is not benefiting their employees as well as it used
to. So all the touting of the magnificence of this ObamaCare helping
people to have better insurance coverage without increasing their cost
is a fraud. It has simply not turned out to be what it was promised to
be, and it doesn't benefit his employees--small business employees--as
well as the plans they had before, he said.
So this is Dr. Sergio's current dilemma. He has a history of
providing a strong benefits package, paying up to 50 percent of
insurance for employees and their dependents and now is unsure how he
can keep it under the new law. He testified that surpassing 50
employees would now bring on more administrative costs and reporting
requirements, causing him to purposely stay under the 50-employee
threshold and utilize more part-time employees that work less than 30
hours per week.
We have heard story after story after story on this floor. I have an
abundance of messages coming into my office simply saying I have no
choice other than to put my full-time employees on a part-time basis.
And I have no choice of adding new employees who take me over the 50-
employee threshold because it puts me into all these regulations and
impositions by ObamaCare. So it is having a dramatic negative effect on
employment--on business growth--and that is where the jobs are. It is
not the big companies as much as it is small companies in America, and
they are being strangled over these regulations and taxes imposed and
the regulations telling them what they have put together that their
employees are happy with, that allow the employer to be profitable so
they can continue to maintain these benefits and increase wages is
simply out the window under ObamaCare.
Can we repair the damage of ObamaCare? Dr. Sergio closed his remarks
with this request:
Please work to undo the vast harms that ObamaCare has and
is causing to the middle class and start addressing the
essential issue of unleashing small businesses to create
millions of new jobs which could raise most people from being
at risk and into truly affordable plans.
As a small business entrepreneur and job creator, I urge
you to repeal ObamaCare, and allow for market innovation
within the health industry, and allow for pooling across
State lines, and allow small businesses freedom from
oppressive requirements, new taxes and fees, and increased
uncertainty.
I was moved by his testimony, and that is why I am standing here
today, so I can put it in the Record. I was moved by his experience of
how ObamaCare has impacted his business decisions in a negative way,
how it has hurt his employees, the families of his employees, how it
has restricted him from expanding his business, how it has caused him
from going to a profitable business, where he could do more research,
do more innovation, pay more, provide more benefits to his employees to
a situation where he now has to reduce those benefits, where he has to
sit down with his employees and say, I am sorry, under the requirements
of this new act, this is where we are as a company. We can't continue
to give you the benefits you once had. We can't raise your wages
because we are not making the profits, and it is either go out of
business or it is to try to struggle along under this new law, which is
why he believes we need to change it.
I certainly agree with that, and I think this is backed by tens of
millions of businesses all across America. We can all agree with the
goal of ensuring access to quality care when it is needed. I don't
think anyone on this floor has disputed that fact. Unfortunately, a
one-size-fits-all government-run health care system is not the answer.
We are looking for the best workable, real-world solution for Americans
and their health care, and we have not hit that mark. This Congress has
failed and this administration has failed to hit that mark.
[[Page S3984]]
We should pursue initiatives that truly make health care an option
for all. Such initiatives should drive down costs by increasing
competition and transparency, reforming medical malpractice, making
health insurance portable, promoting pooling options for small
businesses, and giving States greater flexibility in how they deliver
their services.
Dr. Sergio should have better certainty for his business, and all
small business people should have better certainty for their future.
His employees should have a better health care system, as should all
Americans. These are the goals we need to reach.
We should strive for a system that puts individuals squarely in
charge of their health care and doesn't discourage Americans from
working and improving their earnings. That is the American dream Dr.
Sergio's father sought to achieve when he started his business 36 years
ago. That is the dream we should pursue. Yet we are hampered in doing
that by the onerous regulations, taxes, and stipulations imposed by the
health care law passed by one party without any input from the opposing
party, and famously labeled as something we would need to learn about
after it was passed. That was probably the most telling statement by a
Member of Congress--in this case the former majority leader and then-
Speaker of the House of Representatives--about something that was
shoved down America's throat without any bipartisan support whatsoever.
Now, yes, if it had been read before it was passed, we could have
avoided all of this. It could have been debated and people could have
looked for a bipartisan way of moving forward to provide health care
for the uninsured and to ensure the health care plan they imposed would
not have these negative effects. That is what should have happened. It
didn't. We now have a chance to rectify that. We have a chance to
remedy that. We are waiting for a Supreme Court decision before we go
forward with an alternative to what has cost us in terms of jobs and
all the costs to small businesses in terms of their ability to grow.
That is a part of the American dream. We have denied that under this
health care program, and I am hoping my colleagues will join us as we
look to address this very important issue--important not only for the
health of the American public but important for the growth of our
economy.
Mr. President, with that, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Will the Senator withhold his suggestion?
Mr. COATS. The Senator will be happy to do just that.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Colorado.
____________________