[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 91 (Tuesday, June 9, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3891-S3892]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, last fall, Republicans promised that if we
were elected to the majority in the Senate, we would get the Senate
working again. A big part of that is getting the appropriations process
working again. When the Senate is functioning properly, 12 separate
appropriations bills are considered individually in the Appropriations
Committee and then brought to the Senate floor for debate and
amendment.
This process is designed to allow Senators to carefully examine
programs and consider the best and most responsible way to distribute
funding. But the
[[Page S3892]]
appropriations process has not worked that way for a while. Too often,
over the past few years, the majority of the year's appropriations
bills have been thrown together in one catchall funding bill, greatly
reducing Senators' ability to take a hard look at spending and to
ensure that funds are being allocated responsibly.
Republicans are determined to change that. We started the
appropriations process by passing a balanced budget resolution for the
first time in over 10 years. This week, we continue the process with
the National Defense Authorization Act, which authorizes funding for
our Nation's defense and our men and women in uniform. This
authorization bill is the first step in the appropriations process for
defense funding under what we call regular order.
This legislation accomplishes a number of important things. It
authorizes funding for our military at the President's requested level
of $612 billion. It also eliminates waste and inefficiencies.
Specifically, the bill targets $10 billion in wasteful and unnecessary
spending and redirects those funds to military priorities such as
funding for aircraft and weapons systems and modernization of Navy
vessels.
The bill also focuses heavily on reform. The military's current
process for acquiring new equipment and technologies is inefficient and
bureaucratic. It wastes our Nation's resources and, even more
importantly, it reduces our military readiness by delaying the
acquisition of essential weapons, equipment, and technology. The
National Defense Authorization Act introduces broad reforms to
modernize and streamline the acquisitions process, which will
significantly improve the military's ability to access technology and
equipment when it needs it.
The act also implements a number of reforms to the Pentagon's
administrative functions. Over the past few years, Army Headquarters
staff has increased while combat personnel have been cut. Army
Headquarters staff increased 60 percent over the past decade, yet the
Army is currently cutting brigade combat teams.
From 2001 to 2012, the Department of Defense's civilian workforce
grew at five times the rate of Active-Duty military. Prioritizing
bureaucracy at the expense of our preparedness and our Active-Duty
military is not an acceptable use of resources.
The Defense authorization bill that we are considering changes the
emphasis at the Department of Defense from administration to
operations, which will help ensure that our military personnel receive
the training they need and that our military is ready to meet any
threats that arise. Finally, this bill overhauls our military
retirement system. The current military retirement system limits
retirement benefits to soldiers who served for 20 years or more, which
eliminates 83 percent of those who have served, including many veterans
of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The National Defense Authorization Act replaces this system with a
modern retirement system that would extend retirement benefits to 75
percent of our servicemembers. The bill before us today is a strong
bill. It is the product of bipartisan efforts. It authorizes funding
for our troops at the level requested by the President and provides key
reforms that will strengthen our Nation's defense and improve training
benefits and quality of life for our servicemembers.
Supporting this legislation should be a no-brainer. Incredibly,
however, the President has threatened to veto this important
legislation. His reason is that the President does not want our
military to receive the increased levels of funding proscribed in this
bill unless the President's nondefense funding priorities receive an
increased level of funding.
That is right. Apparently, President Obama is willing to hold up
funding for our Nation's military until Congress provides more funding
for agencies such as the IRS and the EPA. Well, the President can
certainly make his case to Congress when it comes to funding government
agencies. Holding troop funding hostage for political purposes is
reckless and irresponsible. If that were not enough, the White House is
busy lobbying Senate Democrats to abandon bipartisan efforts that went
into this bill and back up a Presidential veto.
The National Defense Authorization Act plays a key role in keeping
our Nation safe. The President's attempt to hijack this bill for his
political purposes is wrong. I very much hope that he will consider the
implications of what he is doing and rethink that threat.
____________________