[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 89 (Thursday, June 4, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3805-S3806]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SA 1687. Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Heller, Mr. 
Moran, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Daines, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Roberts) 
submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1463 
proposed by Mr. McCain to the bill H.R. 1735, to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 2016 for military activities of the 
Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe 
military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other 
purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       At the appropriate place, insert the following:

     SEC. ___. PROTECTION AND RECOVERY OF GREATER SAGE GROUSE.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) The term ``Federal resource management plan'' means--
       (A) a land use plan prepared by the Bureau of Land 
     Management for public lands pursuant to section 202 of the 
     Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 
     1712); or
       (B) a land and resource management plan prepared by the 
     Forest Service for National Forest System lands pursuant to 
     section 6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources 
     Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604).
       (2) The term ``Greater Sage Grouse'' means a sage grouse of 
     the species Centrocercus urophasianus.
       (3) The term ``State management plan'' means a State-
     approved plan for the protection and recovery of the Greater 
     Sage Grouse.
       (b) Purpose.--The purpose of this section is--
       (1) to facilitate implementation of State management plans 
     over a period of multiple, consecutive sage grouse life 
     cycles; and
       (2) to demonstrate the efficacy of the State management 
     plans for the protection and recovery of the Greater Sage 
     Grouse.
       (c) Endangered Species Act of 1973 Findings.--
       (1) Delay required.--Any finding by the Secretary of the 
     Interior under clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of section 
     4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
     1533(b)(3)(B)) with respect to the Greater Sage Grouse made 
     during the period beginning on September 30, 2015, and ending 
     on the date of the enactment of this Act shall have no force 
     or effect in law or in equity, and the Secretary of the 
     Interior may not make any such finding during the period 
     beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 
     on September 30, 2025.
       (2) Effect on other laws.--The delay imposed by paragraph 
     (1) is, and shall remain, effective without regard to any 
     other statute, regulation, court order, legal settlement, or 
     any other provision of law or in equity.
       (3) Effect on conservation status.--Until the date 
     specified in paragraph (1), the conservation status of the 
     Greater Sage Grouse shall remain warranted for listing under 
     the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), 
     but precluded by higher-priority listing actions pursuant to 
     clause (iii) of section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species 
     Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(B)).
       (d) Coordination of Federal Land Management and State 
     Conservation and Management Plans.--
       (1) Prohibition on modification of federal resource 
     management plans.--In order to foster coordination between a 
     State management plan and Federal resource management plans 
     that affect the Greater Sage Grouse, upon notification by the 
     Governor of a State with a State management plan, the 
     Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture 
     may not amend or otherwise modify any Federal resource 
     management plan applicable to Federal lands in the State in a 
     manner inconsistent with the State management plan for a 
     period, to be specified by the Governor in the notification, 
     of at least five years beginning on the date of the 
     notification.
       (2) Retroactive effect.--In the case of any State that 
     provides notification under paragraph (1), if any amendment 
     or modification of a Federal resource management plan 
     applicable to Federal lands in the State was issued during 
     the one-year period preceding the date of the notification 
     and the amendment or modification altered management of the 
     Greater Sage Grouse or its habitat, implementation and 
     operation of the amendment or modification shall be stayed to 
     the extent that the amendment or modification is inconsistent 
     with the State management plan. The Federal resource 
     management plan, as in effect immediately before the 
     amendment or modification, shall apply instead with respect 
     to management of the Greater Sage Grouse and its habitat, to 
     the extent consistent with the State management plan.
       (3) Determination of inconsistency.--Any disagreement 
     regarding whether an amendment or other modification of a 
     Federal resource management plan is inconsistent with a State 
     management plan shall be resolved by the Governor of the 
     affected State.
       (e) Relation to National Environmental Policy Act of 
     1969.--With regard to any Federal action consistent with a 
     State management plan, any findings, analyses, or conclusions 
     regarding the Greater Sage Grouse or its habitat under the 
     National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et 
     seq.) shall not have a preclusive effect on the approval or 
     implementation of the Federal action in that State.
       (f) Reporting Requirement.--Not later than one year after 
     the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter 
     through 2021, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 
     of Agriculture shall jointly submit to the Committee on 
     Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee 
     on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report 
     on the Secretaries' implementation and effectiveness of 
     systems to monitor the status of Greater Sage Grouse on 
     Federal lands under their jurisdiction.
       (g) Judicial Review.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
     of statute or regulation, this section, including 
     determinations made under subsection (d)(3), shall not be 
     subject to judicial review.

     SEC. ___. IMPLEMENTATION OF LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN RANGE-WIDE 
                   CONSERVATION PLAN AND OTHER CONSERVATION 
                   MEASURES.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Candidate conservation agreements.--The terms 
     ``Candidate Conservation Agreement'' and ``Candidate and 
     Conservation Agreement With Assurances'' have the meaning 
     given those terms in--
       (A) the announcement of the Department of the Interior and 
     the Department of Commerce entitled ``Announcement of Final 
     Policy for Candidate Conservation Agreements with 
     Assurances'' (64 Fed. Reg. 32726 (June 17, 1999)); and
       (B) sections 17.22(d) and 17.32(d) of title 50, Code of 
     Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of 
     this Act).
       (2) Range-wide plan.--The term ``Range-Wide Plan'' means 
     the Lesser Prairie-Chicken Range-Wide Conservation Plan of 
     the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, as 
     endorsed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service on 
     October 23, 2013, and published for comment on January 29, 
     2014 (79 Fed. Reg. 4652).
       (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
     of the Interior.
       (b) Prohibition on Treatment as Threatened or Endangered 
     Species.--
       (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any prior action by the 
     Secretary, the lesser prairie-chicken shall not be treated as 
     a threatened species or endangered species under the 
     Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) 
     before January 31, 2021.
       (2) Prohibition on proposal.--Effective beginning on 
     January 31, 2021, the lesser prairie-chicken may not be 
     treated as a threatened species or endangered species under 
     the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) 
     unless the Secretary publishes a determination, based on the 
     totality of the scientific evidence, that conservation (as 
     that term is used in that Act) under the Range-Wide Plan and 
     the agreements, programs, and efforts referred to in 
     subsection (c) have not achieved the conservation goals 
     established by the Range-Wide Plan.
       (c) Monitoring of Progress of Conservation Programs.--The 
     Secretary shall monitor and annually submit to Congress a 
     report on progress in conservation of the lesser prairie-
     chicken under the Range-Wide Plan and all related--
       (1) Candidate Conservation Agreements and Candidate and 
     Conservation Agreements With Assurances;
       (2) other Federal conservation programs administered by the 
     United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land 
     Management, and the Department of Agriculture;
       (3) State conservation programs; and
       (4) private conservation efforts.

     SEC. ___. REMOVAL OF ENDANGERED SPECIES STATUS FOR AMERICAN 
                   BURYING BEETLE.

       Notwithstanding the final rule of the United States Fish 
     and Wildlife Service entitled ``Endangered and Threatened 
     Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for 
     the American Burying Beetle'' (54 Fed. Reg. 29652 (July 13, 
     1989)), the American

[[Page S3806]]

     burying beetle shall not be listed as a threatened or 
     endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (16 
     U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
                                 ______