[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 88 (Wednesday, June 3, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3697-S3698]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SA 1526. Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Mr. Franken) submitted an 
amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1463 proposed by Mr. 
McCain to the bill H.R. 1735, to authorize appropriations for fiscal 
year 2016 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for 
military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for 
such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on 
the table; as follows:

       At the end of title XVI, add the following:

          Subtitle F--Smarter Approach to Nuclear Expenditures

     SEC. 1671. SHORT TITLE.

       This subtitle may be cited as the ``Smarter Approach to 
     Nuclear Expenditures Act''.

     SEC. 1672. FINDINGS.

       Congress finds the following:
       (1) The Berlin Wall fell in 1989, the Soviet Union no 
     longer exists, and the Cold War is over. The nature of 
     threats to the national security and military interests of 
     the United States has changed. However, the United States 
     continues to maintain an enormous arsenal of nuclear weapons 
     and delivery systems that were devised with the Cold War in 
     mind.
       (2) The current nuclear arsenal of the United States 
     includes approximately 5,000 total nuclear warheads, of which 
     approximately 2,000 are deployed with three delivery 
     components: long-range strategic bomber aircraft, land-based 
     intercontinental ballistic missiles, and submarine-launched 
     ballistic missiles. The bomber fleet of the United States 
     comprises 93 B-52 and 20 B-2 aircraft. The United States 
     maintains 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles. The United 
     States also maintains 14 Ohio-class submarines, up to 12 of 
     which are deployed at sea. Each of those submarines is armed 
     with up to 96 independently targetable nuclear warheads.
       (3) This Cold War-based approach to nuclear security comes 
     at significant cost. Over the next 10 years, the United 
     States will spend hundreds of billions of dollars maintaining 
     its nuclear force. A substantial decrease in spending on the 
     nuclear arsenal of the United States is prudent for both the 
     budget and national security.
       (4) The national security interests of the United States 
     can be well served by reducing the total number of deployed 
     nuclear warheads and their delivery systems, as stated by the 
     Department of Defense's June 2013 nuclear policy guidance 
     entitled, ``Report on Nuclear Employment Strategy of the 
     United States''. This guidance found that force levels under 
     the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and 
     Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 
     2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011, between the 
     United States and the Russian Federation (commonly known as 
     the ``New START Treaty'') ``are more than adequate for what 
     the United States needs to fulfill its national security 
     objectives'' and that the force can be reduced by up to \1/3\ 
     below levels under the New START Treaty to 1,000 to 1,100 
     warheads.
       (5) Even without additional reductions in deployed 
     strategic warheads, the United States can save tens of 
     billions of dollars by deploying those warheads more 
     efficiently on delivery systems and by deferring production 
     of new delivery systems until they are needed.
       (6) Economic security and national security are linked and 
     both will be well served by smart defense spending. Admiral 
     Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated on 
     June 24, 2010, ``Our national debt is our biggest national 
     security threat'' and on August 2, 2011, stated, ``I haven't 
     changed my view that the continually increasing debt is the 
     biggest threat we have to our national security.''.
       (7) The Government Accountability Office has found that 
     there is significant waste in the construction of the nuclear 
     facilities of the National Nuclear Security Administration of 
     the Department of Energy.

     SEC. 1673. REDUCTION IN NUCLEAR FORCES.

       (a) Prohibition on New Long-Range Penetrating Bomber 
     Aircraft.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none 
     of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
     available for any of fiscal years 2015 through 2024 for the 
     Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the 
     research, development, test, and evaluation or procurement of 
     a long-range penetrating bomber aircraft.
       (b) Prohibition on F-35 Nuclear Mission.--Notwithstanding 
     any other provision of law, none of the funds authorized to 
     be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 
     2015 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of 
     Defense or the Department of Energy may be used to make the 
     F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft capable of carrying 
     nuclear weapons.
       (c) Reduction in the B61 Life Extension Program.--
     Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 or any fiscal year thereafter for the 
     Department of Defense or the Department of Energy may be 
     obligated or expended for the B61 life extension program 
     until the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy 
     jointly certify to Congress that the total cost of the B61 
     life extension program has been reduced to not more than 
     $4,000,000,000.
       (d) Termination of W78 Life Extension Program.--
     Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 or any fiscal year thereafter for the 
     Department of Defense or the Department of Energy may be 
     obligated or expended for the W78 life extension program.
       (e) Reduction of Nuclear-Armed Submarines.--Notwithstanding 
     any other provision of law, beginning in fiscal year 2021, 
     the forces of the Navy shall include not more than eight 
     ballistic-missile submarines available for deployment.
       (f) Limitation on SSBN-X Submarines.--Notwithstanding any 
     other provision of law--
       (1) none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
     otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2015 through 
     2024 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or 
     expended for the procurement of an SSBN-X submarine; and
       (2) none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
     otherwise made available for fiscal year 2025 or any fiscal 
     year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be 
     obligated or expended for the procurement of more than eight 
     such submarines.
       (g) Prohibition on New Intercontinental Ballistic 
     Missile.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of 
     the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
     available for any of fiscal years 2015 through 2024 for the 
     Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the 
     research, development, test, and evaluation or procurement of 
     a new intercontinental ballistic missile.
       (h) Termination of Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility 
     Project.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of 
     the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 
     available for fiscal year 2015 or any fiscal year thereafter 
     for the Department of Defense or the Department of Energy may 
     be obligated or expended for the

[[Page S3698]]

     Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility project.
       (i) Termination of Uranium Processing Facility.--
     Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 or any fiscal year thereafter for the 
     Department of Defense or the Department of Energy may be 
     obligated or expended for the Uranium Processing Facility 
     located at the Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, 
     Tennessee.
       (j) Prohibition on New Air Launched Cruise Missile.--
     Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds 
     authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for 
     fiscal year 2015 or any fiscal year thereafter for the 
     Department of Defense or the Department of Energy may be 
     obligated or expended for the research, development, test, 
     and evaluation or procurement of a new air-launched cruise 
     missile or for the W80 warhead life extension program.

     SEC. 1674. REPORTS REQUIRED.

       (a) Initial Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and 
     the Secretary of Energy shall jointly submit to the 
     appropriate committees of Congress a report outlining the 
     plan of each Secretary to carry out section 1673.
       (b) Annual Report.--Not later than March 1, 2016, and 
     annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense and the 
     Secretary of Energy shall jointly submit to the appropriate 
     committees of Congress a report outlining the plan of each 
     Secretary to carry out section 1673, including any updates to 
     previously submitted reports.
       (c) Annual Nuclear Weapons Accounting.--Not later than 
     September 30, 2016, and annually thereafter, the President 
     shall transmit to the appropriate committees of Congress a 
     report containing a comprehensive accounting by the Director 
     of the Office of Management and Budget of the amounts 
     obligated and expended by the Federal Government for each 
     nuclear weapon and related nuclear program during--
       (1) the fiscal year covered by the report; and
       (2) the life cycle of such weapon or program.
       (d) Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' 
     means--
       (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the 
     Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; and
       (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 
     Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, the 
     Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on 
     Natural Resources of the House of Representatives.
                                 ______