[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 88 (Wednesday, June 3, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Page S3695]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  SA 1516. Ms. MURKOWSKI submitted an amendment intended to be proposed 
to amendment SA 1463 proposed by Mr. McCain to the bill H.R. 1735, to 
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2016 for military activities 
of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to 
prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for 
other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

       At the end of subtitle E of title X, add the following:

     SEC. 1049. CODIFICATION IN LAW OF ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES OF 
                   THE OFFICE OF COMPLEX ADMINISTRATIVE 
                   INVESTIGATIONS IN THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.

       (a) In General.--There is in the Office of the Chief of the 
     National Guard Bureau the Office of Complex Administrative 
     Investigations (in this section referred to as the 
     ``Office'').
       (b) Direction and Supervision.--The Office shall be under 
     the direction and supervision of the Chief of the National 
     Guard Bureau.
       (c) Duties.--
       (1) In general.--The duties of the Office shall be to 
     undertake complex administrative investigations of matters 
     relating to members of the National Guard when in State 
     status, including investigations of sexual assault involving 
     a member of the National Guard in such status, upon the 
     request of any of the following:
       (A) The Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
       (B) An adjutant general of a State or territory or the 
     District of Columbia.
       (C) The governor of a State or territory, or the Commanding 
     General of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.
       (2) Complex administrative investigations.--For purposes of 
     this subsection, a complex administrative investigation is 
     any investigation (as specified by the Chief of the National 
     Guard Bureau for purposes of this section) involving factors 
     giving rise to unusual complexity in investigation, including 
     the following:
       (A) Questions of jurisdiction between the United States and 
     a State or territory.
       (B) Matters requiring specialized training among 
     investigating officers.
       (C) Matters raising the need for an independent 
     investigation in order to ensure fairness and impartiality in 
     investigation.
       (3) Matters relating to members of the national guard in 
     state status.--The determination whether or not a matter 
     relates to a member of the National Guard when in State 
     status for purposes of this section shall be made by the 
     Chief of the National Guard Bureau in accordance with 
     criteria specified by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau 
     for purposes of this section.
       (d) Chief of National Guard Bureau Treatment of Final 
     Reports.--The Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall treat 
     any final report of the Office on a matter under this section 
     as if such report were the report of an Inspector General of 
     the Department of Defense or a military department on such 
     matter.
       (e) Reports to Congress.--
       (1) Submittal of final reports to congressional 
     delegations.--Upon the adoption by the Office of a final 
     report on an investigation undertaken by the Office pursuant 
     to this section, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall 
     submit such report (with any personally identifying 
     information appropriately redacted) to the members of 
     Congress from the State or territory concerned.
       (2) Annual reports.--The Chief of the National Guard Bureau 
     shall submit to Congress each year a report on the 
     investigations undertaken by the Office pursuant to this 
     section during the preceding year. Each report shall include, 
     for the year covered by such report, the following:
       (A) A summary description of the investigations undertaken 
     during such year, including any trends in matters subject to 
     investigation and in findings as a result of investigations.
       (B) Information, set forth by State and territory, on the 
     investigations undertaken during such year involving 
     allegations of sexual assault involving a member of the 
     National Guard.
       (C) Such other information and matters on the 
     investigations undertaken during such year as the Chief of 
     the National Guard Bureau considers appropriate.
       (f) Personnel and Other Capabilities.--The Chief of the 
     National Guard Bureau shall ensure that the Office maintains 
     the personnel and other capabilities necessary for the 
     discharge of the duties of the Office under this section.
       (g) Procedures and Instructions.--The Chief of the National 
     Guard Bureau shall issue, and may from time to time update, 
     procedures and instructions necessary for the discharge of 
     the duties of the Office under this section.
       (h) Repeal of Superseded Instruction.--Chief of the 
     National Guard Bureau Instruction CNGBI 0400.01, dated July 
     30, 2012, shall have no further force or effect.

     SEC. 1050. COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT ON 
                   SERIOUS MISCONDUCT WITHIN THE NATIONAL GUARD.

       Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of 
     this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall 
     submit to the congressional defense committees a report 
     setting forth the following:
       (1) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the authorities 
     of the Secretary of Defense and the Chief of the National 
     Guard Bureau to investigate and respond on their own 
     initiative to allegations of serious misconduct, including 
     but not limited to sexual assault, sexual harassment, 
     violations of Federal law, retaliation, and waste, fraud, and 
     abuse arising in operations of the National Guard in Federal 
     status and in State status.
       (2) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the mechanisms 
     available to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries of the 
     military departments, and the Chief of the National Guard to 
     receive, process, and monitor the disposition of allegations 
     described in paragraph (1), whether first brought to the 
     attention of the Federal government or the Adjutants General.
       (3) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the process used 
     to determine whether allegations described in paragraph (1) 
     are investigated by the Department of Defense, the Inspector 
     General of the Department of Defense, the Inspector General 
     of the National Guard Bureau, the Inspectors General of the 
     military departments, the Office of Complex Administrative 
     Investigations of the National Guard Bureau, Federal military 
     or civilian law enforcement agencies, or other agencies in 
     the first instance, and the coordination of investigations 
     among such agencies
       (4) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the monitoring of 
     investigations into allegations described in paragraph (1) by 
     the Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries of the military 
     departments, and the Chief of the National Guard Bureau which 
     are undertaken by Federal agencies and those undertaken under 
     the direction of the Adjutants General.
       (5) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the process used 
     for disposing of substantiated allegations described in 
     paragraph (1), whether by prosecution or administrative 
     action, and the consistency in the disposition of allegations 
     of a similar nature across the National Guard.
       (6) An evaluation of the effectiveness of State codes of 
     military justice in prosecuting members of the National Guard 
     for serious misconduct described in paragraph (1), and an 
     assessment whether chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code 
     (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), should be extended to 
     authorize prosecution of some or all offenses committed by 
     members of the National Guard while in State status.
       (7) An evaluation of the effectiveness of mechanisms to 
     protect the confidentiality of members of the National Guard 
     who report allegations described in paragraph (1) and to 
     prevent retaliation against such members.
       (8) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the National 
     Guard Bureau in preventing and proactively identifying 
     instances of serious misconduct described in paragraph (1), 
     including the availability and effectiveness of hotlines 
     through which members of the National Guard who are 
     uncomfortable reporting their concerns through State channels 
     may bring them to the attention of the National Guard Bureau 
     and the use of command climate surveys in identifying serious 
     misconduct.
                                 ______