[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Page S2481]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                    AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED

       SA 1177. Mr. HELLER (for himself, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Cotton, Mr. 
     Inhofe, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Kirk) submitted an amendment 
     intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1191, to 
     amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that 
     emergency services volunteers are not taken into account as 
     employees under the shared responsibility requirements 
     contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; 
     which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1178. Mr. INHOFE submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1179. Mr. CORKER (for himself and Mr. Cardin) proposed 
     an amendment to amendment SA 1140 proposed by Mr. Corker (for 
     himself and Mr. Cardin) to the bill H.R. 1191, supra.
       SA 1180. Mr. THUNE submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1140 proposed by Mr. Corker (for 
     himself and Mr. Cardin) to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which 
     was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1181. Mr. BARRASSO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1140 proposed by Mr. Corker (for 
     himself and Mr. Cardin) to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which 
     was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1182. Mr. ROBERTS submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1183. Mr. ROBERTS submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1184. Mr. DAINES submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1140 proposed by Mr. Corker (for 
     himself and Mr. Cardin) to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which 
     was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1185. Mr. DAINES submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1140 proposed by Mr. Corker (for 
     himself and Mr. Cardin) to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which 
     was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1186. Mr. VITTER submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1187. Mr. VITTER submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1188. Mr. VITTER submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1189. Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. Hoeven, and Mr. 
     Lankford) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
     her to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which was ordered to lie on 
     the table.
       SA 1190. Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. Warner) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1140 
     proposed by Mr. Corker (for himself and Mr. Cardin) to the 
     bill H.R. 1191, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1191. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1140 proposed by Mr. Corker (for 
     himself and Mr. Cardin) to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which 
     was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1192. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1140 proposed by Mr. Corker (for 
     himself and Mr. Cardin) to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which 
     was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1193. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1140 proposed by Mr. Corker (for 
     himself and Mr. Cardin) to the bill H.R. 1191, supra; which 
     was ordered to lie on the table.

                          ____________________