[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Page S2442]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE BUDGET
Mr. REID. Mr. President, when I first came to the Senate and when I
served in the House, conference committees were an important part of
the business we did here in Congress. But in recent years--very recent
years--going to conference hasn't been what it used to be.
Going to conference on a piece of legislation used to mean there
would be serious discussions and compromises that generally produced a
product that could be supported by Members of both parties. It was a
real conference. Democrats sat down with Republicans and in a public
forum determined what should happen on that bill.
I can remember going to those conferences. They were tough, they were
long, and there were a lot of compromises made. But that is what
legislation is--the art of compromise. When we finished, we had a
product that was supported by both parties.
That is why we used to do appropriations bills like that. Why? As an
example, Senator Domenici and I for many years were the chairman and
ranking member of a very important subcommittee, energy and water. It
was very important, billions and billions of dollars. We did our work
as a subcommittee, but then we were able to meet and work these out in
conference. That is why we came to the floor. We did the bill in a few
hours because everyone had had their input.
Sadly, under a Republican House and a Republican Senate, that is no
longer the case. Here is an example: the budget conference resolution.
There is all the chest-beating and flexing of muscles in the press. The
Republicans have a budget. They worked and worked and got it done. They
finished the conference.
The Republican majorities in the House and the Senate don't even
bother to show that there is a bipartisan consensus building; they just
do it. Any meetings that have been had on this bill with Democrats have
been strictly for show.
There is no discussion. There is no public debate. There is nothing
done. It is Republicans in the House and Republicans in the Senate
meeting together. I would bet that the conferences even between the
House and the Senate were done mainly by the two chairs of the
committees. Not a word of input on this bill--not a word of input on
this bill from Democrats. It is no conference. The party already knows
what they want; they are not interested in our ideas.
Forbes magazine--I don't quote Forbes magazine very often for obvious
reasons. It is a very conservative news outlet, but listen to what they
said, and I quote verbatim:
This will not be the start of a period of bipartisanship
when it comes to budget issues. To the contrary, the budget
resolution conference report that will likely be voted on
this week will solely become a product of what the Republican
majorities in the House and Senate wanted to do. There was
little-to-no effort to involve Democrats in the negotiations
because the leadership would risk losing GOP votes in both
houses by doing so. They also would have risked alienating
the GOP base, much of which continues to believe a compromise
with congressional Democrats and the Obama administration is
the political equivalent of collaborating with the enemy.
How about that; every word of this is true. It is so sad for our
country when working across party lines is considered collaborating
with the enemy.
I have said here on the floor many times, and I will say it again:
When Obama was elected the first time, Republicans gathered here in
Washington--a couple of days the meeting took, and it has been written
up a lot of times--and they made two conclusions. They came to two
conclusions: No. 1, we are not going to have Obama reelected. They
failed miserably with that. But on the second thing they have been
successful; that is, they would oppose anything and everything
President Obama wanted. They have done that now for 6\1/2\ years.
What a sad day for our country.
____________________