[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 58 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2285-S2286]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
LYNCH NOMINATION
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, it has been 165 days--5\1/2\ months--since
the nomination of Loretta Lynch to be Attorney General was announced.
Ms. Lynch has been pending on the Senate Executive Calendar for nearly
2 months. She was reported out of the Senate Judiciary Committee in a
bipartisan vote--nine Democrats and three Republicans--on February 26.
This is a new record, sadly, in terms of delay in appointing an
Attorney General. The last seven nominees to be Attorney General of the
United States combined--combined--waited on the Senate floor 24 days--
seven nominees, 24 days.
Sadly, Ms. Lynch has now been waiting over 50 days. Why? What is it
about this nominee that causes so much of a problem? Nothing came up at
the Judiciary Committee hearing to suggest a problem. Yes, she was
appointed by Barack Obama. Yes, she has said she will serve this
President. But when it came to her personally, there was nothing. In
fact, we have this tradition that after the nominee has testified under
oath, then experts are brought in. Each party can bring an expert in to
testify for or against the Attorney General nominee. Senator Patrick
Leahy, the ranking Democrat on Judiciary, said to the assembled group--
I think there may have been 10 or 12 of these outside witnesses: Which
of you, by show of hands, objects to the nomination of Loretta Lynch
for Attorney General? Not a single one raised his hand--none. So even
the witnesses that were brought to speak in negative terms all conceded
that she should be Attorney General.
That is rare. It is rare to have a nominee with that kind of
affirmation come out of the Senate Judiciary Committee--and for good
reason. When you look at her record, you can understand why. This young
woman has an extraordinary record of service. She grew up in North
Carolina as the daughter of a minister and a school librarian. Her dad
was there at her hearing. Her father was smiling as she recalled those
instances when she was a very young girl, and he would sit her on his
shoulders and take her to see the civil rights events that occurred
when she was so young.
She received her undergraduate and law degrees from Harvard
University. She has private sector experience at prestigious law firms.
She has twice been confirmed unanimously by the Senate to serve as U.S.
attorney for the Eastern District of New York. She served in that
position with distinction.
Her nomination has been endorsed by a wide range of groups,
representing law enforcement, prosecutors, bar associations, business
leaders, civil rights organizations, and former Justice Department
officials from both Democratic and Republican administrations. In what
may be one of the most amazing ironies of this whole situation, Loretta
Lynch has been recognized as a leader when it comes to prosecuting
human traffickers. Why is that significant? Because the Republican
leader announced that he was holding up her nomination until we passed
a bill on human trafficking.
Here is a woman who, as a prosecutor and professional, has prosecuted
the
[[Page S2286]]
people guilty of that crime, and she is being delayed in her
appointment as Attorney General of the United States of America because
of a political debate on the floor of the Senate for almost 4 weeks
over this bill.
Under Ms. Lynch's leadership, the U.S. Attorney's office in the
Eastern District of New York has brought many important prosecutions in
human trafficking. In United States v. Lopez, three brothers were
convicted in 2014 for running a human trafficking ring involving 14-
and 15-year-old girls. Ms. Lynch was also involved in the successful
prosecution of the Granados-Hernandez sex trafficking ring, in which
numerous child trafficking victims were reunited with their mothers. In
United States v. Johnson, Ms. Loretta Lynch was involved in a
prosecution where a Queens man was convicted for trafficking and
prostituting a 15-year-old girl out of his home.
Make no mistake, when it comes to the issue of human trafficking,
this nominee for Attorney General knows more about the subject than
most, and she has a record to prove it. Malika Saada Saar, the
executive director of Rights4Girls, is one of the Nation's leading
antitrafficking advocates. She said: ``It is clear that as the top
prosecutor in Brooklyn, New York, Lynch has a strong record of being
tough on crime and human trafficking.'' She has been held up on the
floor because of our failure to pass a bill on that same subject.
Here is what the President of the National District Attorneys
Association, Michael Moore, said about Ms. Loretta Lynch when he wrote
to express his organization's strong support for her: ``As prosecutors
facing challenges in the field from violent crime, to human
trafficking, to gangs and drug traffickers, our membership feels that
Ms. Lynch understands the operational nature of these challenges and
will be a strong independent voice at the helm of the Department.''
Calling a vote on Ms. Lynch and confirming her would be a big step
forward in the fight against trafficking. It is time to end this delay
and obstruction. This extraordinary woman nominated by the President of
the United States to be the first African-American woman to serve as
Attorney General should have been approved by the Senate long ago.
While she has been waiting patiently for a long, long time, we have
interrupted the business of the Senate to approve the President's
appointments for Assistant Secretary of Transportation, Assistant
Secretary of Commerce, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review
Commissioners, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board Members,
Undersecretary for Management at the Department of Homeland Security,
Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, and several Federal
judges.
We have had more than adequate opportunity to call Ms. Lynch for
approval. Let us not leave Washington this week without voting on
Loretta Lynch to be our next Attorney General. I voted for her in
committee and will proudly support her nomination in the hopes that it
will come to the floor this week.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________