[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E415]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HONORING MICHAEL BRENAN
______
HON. PETE OLSON
of texas
in the house of representatives
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Mr. OLSON. Mr. Speaker, I am privileged to interact with some of the
brightest students in the 22nd Congressional District who serve on my
Congressional Youth Advisory Council. I have gained much by listening
to the high school students who are the future of this great nation.
They provide important insight into the concerns of our younger
constituents and hopefully get a better sense of the importance of
being an active participant in the political process. Many of the
students have written short essays on a variety of topics and I am
pleased to share them with my House colleagues.
Michael Brenan attends Seven Lakes High School in Katy, Texas. The
essay topic is: in your opinion, what role should government play in
our lives?
The debate on the role of government has raged in politics
since the very first inception of government in Sumeria over
5500 years ago. Today's society is certainly a far cry from
those long-gone times, but the discussion on governance still
continues on in our very own Congress to this day. The exact
issues have changes with the times, but general views on the
matter can be split into two groups: those who see the
government only as a stabilizing political and economic
entity, and those who also see it as a tool for significant
change.
Regardless of the merits of either side, there are many
purposes of government which many consider inherent to its
existence and for which it was originally established. In
exchange for the ability to tax citizens for the money
required for its operation, the government provides the
critical services of public defense and order--police forces,
military, civil courts, and so on. The government is usually
also responsible for the universal system of standards (or at
the very least, adopting and enforcing standards set by the
ISO) as well as creating and maintaining transportation, a
monetary system, and upholding private ownership (at least in
a capitalist system). There are also a number of societal
industries and organizations which could be left alone to
their own mechanisms (by means of ultra-conservative laisses-
fair policies), but governments usually take an active role
in at least rudimentary regulation such as professional
certification, education, basic human rights and labor laws,
and controlling or mitigating the natural ebb of flow of an
economy. Indeed, many of the aspects of government which
allow higher society to function are great and necessary
positives--the conflict arises in questions on using the
government's greater powers.
The unfortunate reality of the ideological divide between
so called ``conservatives'' and ``liberals'' is that neither
side is particularly more correct than the other (regardless
of how much they may deride each other). However, it is well
known how dangerous great power can be, and it follows from
this that the society-changing power that a government has
should be used sparingly. The government should use its
``social'' power when there is little other choice due to
deep-rooted ideologies which directly contradict the concept
of equality or threaten the safety and well-being of
citizens, as in the 1960s when segregation had to be forcibly
abolished or when government intervention seemed like the
only way to pull the US out of the Great Depression. Most
every individual has compassion for his common individual,
but ``compassion'' cannot simply be legislated through
extensive social programs, using money from people who may
not even agree with these programs. In all cases, when so
much money and so many lives may be at stake, caution must
necessarily trump passion.
____________________