[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 11, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Page S1398]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGISLATION
Mr. REID. Mr. President, an ancient Greek philosopher once said, ``To
be doing good deeds is man's most glorious task.''
Today the Senate has an opportunity to do a good deed. We have a
chance to do something to address human trafficking. It is hard to
fathom that in the 21st century, slavery continues to rear its ugly
head in the form of human trafficking. But in the shadows of American
society, there are children, women, and men who are literally being
enslaved and subjected to the most shockingly inhumane treatment
imaginable. The victims of human trafficking suffer physical and sexual
abuse and violence. Forced to live in squalor, they have no hope. This
legislation before this body aims to change that. It seeks to not only
prevent trafficking but also gives survivors hope for a new life.
This legislation creates a domestic trafficking victims fund that
will help support victims of trafficking and child pornography get back
on their feet by providing housing, job training, and other support
services. This legislation provides funding to train law enforcement in
rescuing and supporting survivors of human trafficking and effectively
prosecuting traffickers. It officially designates child pornography as
a form of human trafficking and ensures that victims have direct access
to child advocacy centers. It protects victims and witnesses by
treating suspected human traffickers as violent criminals. It keeps
victims of trafficking and child pornography informed regarding any
plea bargain or deferred prosecution related to their cases.
This legislation is good for our country. It will go a long way in
curbing human trafficking and child pornography. That is why it is
supported by 200 law enforcement and victims' rights groups nationwide.
Unfortunately, Republicans are committed to turning a bipartisan bill
into an unrelated and unconscionable political fight. We can give all
the speeches out here we want saying somebody should have read the bill
more closely. The question is--and we can have all kinds of debates out
here as to how it got in the bill. A number of people feel it was by a
little bit of sleight of hand and that it shouldn't be in there. In
this legislation that is meant as an outline to stop child trafficking
and human trafficking generally, there is a provision dealing with
abortion. It has nothing--nothing--to do with this.
I served in the House of Representatives with a very fine man. He has
had his name affixed to an anti-abortion bill--anti-abortion
legislation for almost three decades, and it has been continued year
after year in appropriations bills. What I am talking about, what is
happening in this legislation, it would make it permanent. It is wrong.
If my friend the Republican leader is so in tune with getting this
passed, take that provision out of the bill; otherwise, it will not
pass. Take it out.
It is unfortunate that Republicans are committed to turning a
bipartisan bill into an unrelated, unconscionable political fight. Is
it worth it? Is it really worth endangering a piece of legislation that
would do good for our country?
Democrats will not allow a bill to prevent human trafficking and
child pornography to be hijacked by a Republican ploy. We can do a lot
of good with this legislation, and I hope my Republican friends will
choose to do the right thing and take this out of this legislation and
pass this bill without any gimmicks.
____________________