[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)]
[House]
[Pages H1094-H1095]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DRINKING WATER PROTECTION ACT
Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill
(H.R. 212) to amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to provide for the
assessment and management of the risk of cyanotoxins in drinking water,
and for other purposes, as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 212
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Drinking Water Protection
Act''.
SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT.
(a) Amendment.--Part E of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42
U.S.C. 300j et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the
following new section:
``SEC. 1459. ALGAL TOXIN RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT.
``(a) Strategic Plan.--
``(1) Development.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of enactment of this section, the Administrator shall develop
and submit to Congress a strategic plan for assessing and
managing risks associated with algal toxins in drinking water
provided by public water systems. The strategic plan shall
include steps and timelines to--
``(A) evaluate the risk to human health from drinking water
provided by public water systems contaminated with algal
toxins;
``(B) establish, publish, and update a comprehensive list
of algal toxins which the Administrator determines may have
an adverse effect on human health when present in drinking
water provided by public water systems, taking into account
likely exposure levels;
``(C) summarize--
``(i) the known adverse human health effects of algal
toxins included on the list published under subparagraph (B)
when present in drinking water provided by public water
systems; and
``(ii) factors that cause toxin-producing cyanobacteria and
algae to proliferate and express toxins;
``(D) with respect to algal toxins included on the list
published under subparagraph (B), determine whether to--
``(i) publish health advisories pursuant to section
1412(b)(1)(F) for such algal toxins in drinking water
provided by public water systems;
``(ii) establish guidance regarding feasible analytical
methods to quantify the presence of algal toxins; and
``(iii) establish guidance regarding the frequency of
monitoring necessary to determine if such algal toxins are
present in drinking water provided by public water systems;
``(E) recommend feasible treatment options, including
procedures, equipment, and source water protection practices,
to mitigate any adverse public health effects of algal toxins
included on the list published under subparagraph (B); and
``(F) enter into cooperative agreements with, and provide
technical assistance to, affected States and public water
systems, as identified by the Administrator, for the purpose
of managing risks associated with algal toxins included on
the list published under subparagraph (B).
``(2) Updates.--The Administrator shall, as appropriate,
update and submit to Congress the strategic plan developed
under paragraph (1).
``(b) Information Coordination.--In carrying out this
section the Administrator shall--
``(1) identify gaps in the Agency's understanding of algal
toxins, including--
``(A) the human health effects of algal toxins included on
the list published under subsection (a)(1)(B); and
``(B) methods and means of testing and monitoring for the
presence of harmful algal toxins in source water of, or
drinking water provided by, public water systems;
``(2) as appropriate, consult with--
``(A) other Federal agencies that--
``(i) examine or analyze cyanobacteria or algal toxins; or
``(ii) address public health concerns related to harmful
algal blooms;
``(B) States;
``(C) operators of public water systems;
``(D) multinational agencies;
``(E) foreign governments;
``(F) research and academic institutions; and
``(G) companies that provide relevant drinking water
treatment options; and
``(3) assemble and publish information from each Federal
agency that has--
``(A) examined or analyzed cyanobacteria or algal toxins;
or
``(B) addressed public health concerns related to harmful
algal blooms.
``(c) Use of Science.--The Administrator shall carry out
this section in accordance with the requirements described in
section 1412(b)(3)(A), as applicable.
``(d) Feasible.--For purposes of this section, the term
`feasible' has the meaning given such term in section
1412(b)(4)(D).''.
(b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the
United States shall prepare and submit to Congress a report
that includes--
(1) an inventory of funds--
(A) expended by the United States, for each of fiscal years
2010 through 2014, to examine or analyze toxin-producing
cyanobacteria and algae or address public health concerns
related to harmful algal blooms; and
(B) that includes the specific purpose for which the funds
were made available, the law under which the funds were
authorized, and the Federal agency that received or spent the
funds; and
(2) recommended steps to reduce any duplication, and
improve interagency coordination, of such expenditures.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Ohio (Mr. Latta) and the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) each
will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Ohio.
general leave
Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and
insert extraneous materials in the Record on the bill.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Ohio?
There was no objection.
Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 212, the Drinking Water
Protection Act, which I reintroduced from last Congress in January.
This important, bipartisan legislation requires the EPA to develop and
submit a strategic plan to Congress for assessing and managing risks
associated with algal toxins in drinking water provided by public water
systems.
Unfortunately, from the Great Lakes to other surface freshwaters
across the country, algal toxins, produced by harmful algal blooms, are
presenting a serious concern to human health and safety.
Last August, half a million people in the Toledo, Ohio, area,
including many of my constituents, weren't able to utilize their public
drinking water for over 2 days without risking potentially negative
health effects due to a high level of algal toxins detected in the
city's public water supply. During that time, concerns and questions
were and have since been raised about health effects data, testing
protocols, treatment processes, and appropriate short- and long-term
responses. Furthermore, during hearings in the House Energy and
Commerce Committee, witnesses testified about the further complexity of
this issue due to the numerous other algal toxins and variants that may
have potential negative health effects when present in public drinking
water.
I commend the work that the U.S. EPA, the State of Ohio, and others
have done since the Toledo water emergency to ensure public safety;
however, the situation demonstrated the need for a more strategic,
comprehensive, and strong scientific approach to protect our citizens'
public drinking water. I believe H.R. 212 does just this.
Specifically, the legislation calls for the EPA's strategic plan to
include steps and timelines to: evaluate the risk to human health from
drinking water provided by public water systems contaminated with algal
toxins; establish, publish, and update a comprehensive list of algal
toxins which the administrator determines may have an adverse effect on
human health when present in public drinking water and provide a
summary of those known adverse effects; publish health advisories and
testing methods if the EPA determines it is warranted based on the
published list; recommend feasible treatment options; enter into
cooperative agreements and provide technical assistance to affected
States and public water systems to manage risks associated with algal
toxins; and identify gaps in the EPA's understanding of algal toxins.
I want to thank all the cosponsors of this bill as well as Chairman
Upton,
[[Page H1095]]
Subcommittee Chairman Shimkus, and all the other staff and stakeholders
who have worked diligently on this important legislation.
I urge the full support of my colleagues for H.R. 212.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, harmful algal blooms are a serious and growing threat to
public health. The toxins they produce threaten communities that draw
their water from coastal areas and the Great Lakes. They also pose
risks to those who swim in contaminated waters or eat contaminated
fish.
Health impacts include skin and eye irritation, gastrointestinal
illness, cancer, paralysis, and even death. Economic impacts are also
serious, adversely affecting fishing, recreation, and tourism.
Estimates of annual costs of these algal blooms in the United States
are in the billions of dollars.
This summer, Toledo, Ohio, experienced a profound disruption when
citizens woke to a ``do not drink'' order. The impacts were significant
and widespread. But the problem is not limited to Ohio or Lake Erie.
Harmful algal blooms have been a recurring problem in my home State of
New Jersey for decades. So I appreciate that the majority is taking up
this bipartisan legislation to begin to address this most important
environmental problem.
This bill is a good step. More needs to be done. I am happy to say
that language reported from the Energy and Commerce Committee reflects
several changes sought by Democratic members of the committee. The bill
was broadened to ensure that EPA will look at all algal toxins that may
have an adverse effect on human health and consider source water
protection measures, which are the preferred and most effective
approach to managing harmful algal blooms.
I thank the chairmen and majority staff for working with Ranking
Member Tonko, myself, and the Democratic staff to improve the bill.
For too long, Republicans in Congress have been more interested in
attacking the EPA than supporting the important work the Agency does to
protect human health, and safe drinking water should be a bipartisan
issue. Unfortunately, this bill does lack resources.
Addressing cyanotoxins in drinking water is very expensive for States
and water utilities. If Congress doesn't make funding available at the
Federal level, the money will have to come out of already strained
State budgets or out of consumers' pockets. The cooperative agreements
envisioned in the bill can address some of these costs, Mr. Speaker,
but only if they are funded, and the strategic plan will have no impact
if there are no resources to carry it out.
So I hope this bill can be the start of broader drinking water work
to address important threats like climate change, fracking, security,
and aging infrastructure. As we continue our drinking water work this
Congress, I hope the majority will recognize the importance of funding
in addressing these needs.
Resources are central to the conversation about safe drinking water.
Much of our Nation's drinking water infrastructure is well beyond its
useful life and in desperate need of replacement. Algae and other
emerging threats, spurred by climate change and other factors, add to
the challenge. Investing in drinking water infrastructure protects
public health, creates jobs, and boosts the economy, and this is
something that we should all support.
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleagues on the Energy and Commerce
Committee, the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Latta), and my good friend from
Ohio (Ms. Kaptur) for their hard work to address an important
environmental threat.
I support this bill. I urge its adoption.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I, too, would ask that the House pass H.R. 212.
I appreciate, again, all of the work from all the members and the
staff in putting this bill together and getting it on the floor, and
also Chairman Upton for his work on the legislation as well as Chairman
Shimkus.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Ms. KAPTUR. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the Drinking Water
Protection Act, to arm communities against the threats posed by toxic
algae.
The water emergency across the Toledo region for three days last
August highlighted the need for a more robust federal response to
harmful algal blooms in our Great Lakes and around the country.
Nearly half a million people, businesses, and hospitals were without
fresh water from the city's system.
First and foremost, Northern Ohio--which draws its sustenance from
Lake Erie--has to guarantee our water is safe to drink.
Our communities must be informed and prepared to respond, in the
event of another emergency.
This bill is an important step in the right direction.
It is my hope that it expedites work at the U.S. EPA to publish long-
overdue guidelines on safe consumption limits and testing protocols, in
addition to treatment methods--information the EPA has been working on
for more than a decade and a half.
This is information that our mayors, our governor, and our citizens
are clamoring for.
Congress needs to pass this bill, and I hope our counterparts in the
Senate will take up the measure quickly.
Still, this bill only addresses one facet of the challenge.
We must meet the larger challenge of stopping the growth of these
blooms at their source--the nutrients flooding through our rivers, into
Lake Erie.
That imperative is not included in this particular bill, but we are
working through programs like the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative to
install conservation projects across our watershed.
Congress should overturn the ill-advised proposed cuts to the GLRI
program and fully fund it.
The EPA and Corps of Engineers are also working to better protect our
waterways through the Clean Water Act.
If we are interested in protecting our Lakes and rivers and the
communities that rely on them, Congress should stop opposing this
important progress.
Until the flow of algae-feeding nutrients into the lake is stopped,
the risk of further water emergencies will persist.
I urge my colleagues to join me in this broader effort, and that
starts by supporting the bill before us today.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Latta) that the House suspend the rules and
pass the bill, H.R. 212, as amended.
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds
being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.
Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further
proceedings on this motion will be postponed.
____________________