[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 24 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[House]
[Pages H988-H989]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                        THE IMPORTANCE OF PRE-K

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from 
Texas (Mr. Veasey) for 5 minutes.
  Mr. VEASEY. Mr. Speaker, I come here today to the House floor to 
address an extremely important and timely topic for our Nation: 
investing in high-quality pre-K education. It is really imperative to 
the success of our children, schools, and communities.
  Two years ago, in this Chamber, President Obama laid out his plan to 
provide universal high-quality pre-K for every child in America. Why 
did the President propose such a bold and audacious plan for our 
country? It is really simple. It has been proven that children who 
participate in high-quality prekindergarten programs are more likely to 
have greater academic and life achievements down the road.
  The benefits of a high-quality pre-K education include increased 
eagerness and preparedness to learn; higher reading, writing, and 
mathematics scores; and increased cognitive and social abilities. 
Access to quality pre-K is a much better predictor of achievement than 
race, family income, or parents' education.
  Research has demonstrated that access to prekindergarten programs 
have substantial long-term benefits. Children that have attended 
prekindergarten are 20 percent more likely to graduate from high school 
and 22 percent more likely to own a home. Additionally, these 
individuals are more likely to be employed and less likely to commit 
violent crimes.
  I have to tell you, Mr. Speaker, one of the things that saddens me 
the most about my home State of Texas is that we are leaving a lot of 
really bright young people behind.

                              {time}  1030

  Nearly 550,000 preschool-aged children in Texas do not attend any 
type of pre-K program, despite what I laid out earlier about less 
likely to commit violent crimes, more likely to own homes. You would 
think it would be a no-brainer and we would be committing more towards 
pre-K education.
  Leaving behind this many children, 550,000--over half a million--
really does pose a serious, long-term economic effect to our great 
State and is something that needs to be addressed. It is apparent that 
high-level prekindergarten education produces individuals that are more 
prosperous and more likely to contribute to society in a positive way.
  To help States like my own boost their pre-K education programs, 
President Obama and the Department of Education delivered on his State 
of the Union Address, and they released Preschool Development Grants. 
These grants will help expand high-quality preschool programs in 
targeted communities.
  When the announcements were made in December--again, I have got to 
tell you, we do a lot of great things in Texas, and we often do it 
bigger and better--but I was really disappointed, Mr. Speaker, to learn 
that our State had lost out on $120 million of this grant funding to 
invest in our children and really, ultimately, our future--$120 million 
that the great State of Texas lost out on, over half a million kids 
being left behind. This was really a sad day in the Lone Star State.
  This money would have been used to improve pre-K education and expand 
access to children in low-income communities who need these services 
the most, and losing out on this money should really be a wake-up call 
to Texas and the policymakers there, that we must create a plan to 
improve our pre-K system.
  Texas failed to meet even the minimum requirements of this 
application to provide at least a 50 percent increase in preschool 
slots available, and that is just really unacceptable.
  My State needs a comprehensive pre-K plan that works to increase 
access to high-quality programs, set higher learning standards, improve 
curriculum, and increase teacher training. All those really are very, 
very important keys.
  The failure to invest in our young children is a failure to invest in 
our future. Here in Congress and back home, I intend to work tirelessly 
to provide for the best education system that our Nation can provide.
  But there are some bright spots. I talked about how the State, 
because of the failed application policy that was just really handled 
poorly, how we lost out on $120 million and over half a million kids 
are suffering because of that, but I do think that it is important that 
I point out some of the positives.
  There has been some bipartisan work along these efforts on pre-K, and 
I do want to thank one of my former colleagues in the State 
legislature, State Representative Eric Johnson of Dallas, and a lady 
that I did not serve with out of Georgetown, Texas--near Austin--Marsha 
Farney of Georgetown, to not only increase pre-K funding by $300 
million, but also improve curriculum, teacher training, and lower 
student-teacher ratios.
  In this global economy that we live in today and tomorrow, students 
won't be competing for jobs in the workplace with neighboring States 
but will be competing with kids and students from all over the world.
  Mr. Speaker, let's do this for Texas. Let's do the right thing. Let's 
help these children.

[[Page H989]]



                          ____________________