[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 15 (Thursday, January 29, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Page S620]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY STANDARD
Mr. UDALL. Mr. President, today we are voting in the 11 o'clock
series on the renewable electricity standard--a bill to promote 25
percent of our electricity to come by renewable sources by 2025.
From what we have heard these past few weeks, we are either on the
floor debating an energy bill or a jobs bill. This is what my
Republican friends and colleagues have been saying.
The Keystone Pipeline fits neither one of these descriptions. The
Keystone Pipeline is not an energy bill. The bill lacks a comprehensive
energy policy; it lacks even trying to set one. This is not a ``do it
all, do it right'' energy bill. It isn't even a ``drill, baby, drill''
bill. This is the ``drill, Canada'' bill.
If we are going to debate energy policy, we need to debate and adopt
a renewable electricity standard. The Keystone Pipeline is an
investment in doing things the old way--importing foreign oil. Instead
of doubling down on foreign oil, we should be talking about how we can
move America forward by investing in homegrown energy for the future.
The renewable electricity standard is such a bill.
I wish to point out that States already recognize this fact
significantly. Colorado has a 30-percent target by 2020. Nevada has a
25-percent target by 2025. Oregon has a 25-percent target by 2025. A
number of other States have renewable electricity targets. Twenty-nine
States, in fact, are developing a national market. There are many
States that are meeting these goals and moving forward aggressively.
In 2013, the State of Iowa produced 27 percent of its electricity
alone with wind power.
I see the chairwoman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee on
the floor. I promise to yield. I only have a couple of more minutes. I
thank the chairwoman.
This amendment--the renewable electricity standard--is a start to a
comprehensive energy policy for the United States.
We are told the Keystone Pipeline is a jobs bill. We are told
Keystone will create jobs. Of course, we are all for that. But how many
jobs? We are talking about 2,000, 3,000 construction jobs, but the
permanent jobs are in the range of 50. How about a renewable
electricity standard that promotes long-lasting manufacturing and
installation jobs--American jobs, permanent jobs--jobs that can't be
outsourced?
The renewable electricity standard could create an additional 274,000
to 297,000 jobs in the United States in such areas as construction,
operations, and engineering. Over 50 percent of these jobs would be
created in the manufacturing sector. These are hundreds of thousands of
21st century American jobs in my State and across the country. We owe
it to all Americans to consider this and other amendments that would
improve the bill.
Right now, we are losing out to other countries in both solar and
wind. China has the largest market share. A national renewable
electricity standard would help us move forward aggressively to get our
market share in those two areas.
It is clear to me a national renewable electricity standard would
combat global warming while creating hundreds of thousands of jobs
across the country. It will help maximize our energy potential while
strengthening our economy and our energy security.
Let's vote on that. Let's move forward to meet the real energy needs
of American families.
I thank the chairwoman for being so gracious and for her courtesy.
I yield the floor.
____________________