[Congressional Record Volume 161, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 28, 2015)]
[Senate]
[Pages S549-S551]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDING

  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, 30 days from today, on February 27, the 
Department of Homeland Security, the

[[Page S550]]

lead agency in protecting America from terrorism, will run out of 
money. The only way to prevent this important government agency from 
shutting down is for Congress to pass legislation to fund the 
Department and to do it quickly.
  This morning, we moved to the second reading, what is known as a 
clean appropriations bill, which will provide resources for this 
critical Department. I hope the Senate can take that up quickly and 
pass it quickly as well.
  We should not even be debating the funding for the Homeland Security 
Department. Every other government agency has been funded through the 
end of the fiscal year, the end of September, but not the Department of 
Homeland Security. The House Republicans insisted on separating this 
critical agency from the rest of the Federal Government and treating it 
differently, giving it temporary funding--what is known as a continuing 
resolution--and making it extremely difficult for the Department of 
Homeland Security to do its job to keep America safe.
  Why did the Republicans insist that this one agency be treated 
differently, funded in a way that it can't do its job effectively? They 
are using the deadline, the end of February, on this Department's 
funding in an attempt to force the Senate to accept extreme anti-
immigrant amendments that have been attached to the homeland security 
bill in the House. The House Republicans' message to the Senate is very 
straightforward: Accept our controversial immigration amendments or we 
will shut down the Homeland Security Department. That is the height of 
irresponsibility. Now is not the time to play politics with homeland 
security.
  Just this weekend the world witnessed another horrible terrorist act, 
the beheading of a Japanese hostage by the terrorist group ISIS. In 
light of the terrorist threat we currently face, it would be the height 
of irresponsibility to shut down the Department of Homeland Security as 
threatened by the House Republicans. That is one of the key government 
agencies charged with protecting Americans.
  Today I am calling on the Senate majority leader for a clean 
appropriations bill that we moved forward on the calendar this morning. 
Let's pass this bill. Let's make sure we do it in a timely way. Let's 
fund this Department.
  Some Republican leaders are arguing, well, it is not such a big deal, 
giving temporary funding to the Department of Homeland Security, 
playing roulette with the prospects of whether it will be funded for 
the rest of this fiscal year.
  Last week the Republican chairman of the Senate homeland security 
committee here in the Senate reportedly said, and I quote, that he 
``isn't that concerned about the potential shutdown of the Homeland 
Security Department.''
  Jeh Johnson, the Secretary of Homeland Security, has a much different 
view. He says our homeland security is already at risk because the 
Department is operating under a short-term funding bill known as a 
continuing resolution. Listen to what Secretary Johnson said: ``As long 
as this Department continues to operate on a [continuing resolution], 
we are prevented from funding key homeland security initiatives 
[including] new grants to state and local law enforcement [and] 
additional border security resources.''
  How many times have we heard from the other side of the aisle the 
highest priority in America is our border security? Many of us agreed 
and voted for a comprehensive immigration reform that folded more 
resources than ever into protecting the border. Now the same people, 
the same elected officials, who have been arguing for a strong border 
are underfunding the Department with that responsibility. The Secretary 
reminds us their approach to this is going to jeopardize investments in 
border security.
  What are these amendments the House Republicans feel so strongly 
about that they are willing to risk the funding of this critical 
agency? The bill the House passed would defund President Obama's 
immigration policies, including the Deferred Action for Childhood 
Arrivals Program known as DACA.
  A quick history about how we reached the point we are at today. It 
was 14 years ago when I introduced the DREAM Act. The DREAM Act was 
designed to take care of children brought to America by their parents, 
children who were undocumented, and to give those children a chance, if 
they led a good life and finished school, if they were prepared to go 
to college or join our military, to have a path to legal status. Over 
the years this has been debated widely. Even many Republican leaders 
have stepped up and said, well, it is fundamentally just. Why would you 
hold the children responsible for a decision made by their parents to 
come to this country? Why would you jeopardize the future of a child 
because the parents came here, overstayed their visa, or failed to file 
the necessary papers for their child? Even former Arkansas Governor 
Huckabee, interviewed this Sunday on television, made that very point. 
You don't arrest a parent for speeding in the front seat and then 
arrest the baby sitting in the back seat for speeding. He made that 
point in light of his decisions as the Governor of Arkansas.
  Over time this concept of the DREAM Act has been moving toward 
acceptance by both political parties but moving very slowly. For 14 
years we have been debating this one simple idea, that children should 
not be held responsible for the wrongdoing of their parents, that young 
people brought to this country and undocumented should be given a 
chance. And, of course, 2\1/2\ years ago, President Obama did 
something. He did it at the request of many Senators, including myself. 
We wrote to him and said, Mr. President, while the Senate and Congress 
debate the future of the DREAM Act, there are literally thousands of 
these young people who have no future in America. They don't know which 
way to turn. They can't get drivers licenses. They can't go to school 
with any government assistance. They don't have any basic idea what 
their future is going to be.
  The President said, here is what I will do. I will create this 
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program, the DACA Program. If 
these young people will come forward, if they will submit a filing fee 
to cover the cost of the program, if they will submit themselves to 
background checks, then we will give them temporary status in America--
temporary status in America. We are not making them citizens or 
declaring them legal forever. We are saying they can go to school and 
work without the fear of deportation.
  We estimate there are 2 million young people in our Nation of 350 
million-plus who would qualify for this DACA treatment. Six hundred 
thousand have in fact registered in the 2\1/2\ years since the 
President's decision. DACA put on hold deportation so these young 
people who grow up in this country would have a chance. These are the 
DREAMers. They are the ones we have referred to over and over on the 
floor and tell their stories.
  Think about it. America is already invested in these young people. We 
paid for their education. We sent them to the classrooms in the 
schools. They stood there every morning by their desk, hand over their 
heart, pledging allegiance to the same flag we pledged allegiance to 
this morning. They sang the only national anthem they have ever known. 
They are just asking for a chance.
  Over the years I have come to the floor to tell their stories because 
leaving the explanation at this point really doesn't touch on the 
reality of who these DREAMers are. I am going to tell another story 
this morning, and I want the record to show this young man I am about 
to speak about, Juan Rios. He is a person whom the House Republicans 
want to deport. They have said by their vote--by the amendment they put 
on this appropriations bill--they want Juan Rios to leave the United 
States of America. That is their goal, deport the DREAMers, all of 
those who have signed up for DACA and those who might sign up. That is 
just part of what they are trying to achieve. But that to me is the 
starting point that ought to be our starting point for debate.
  Juan Rios was brought to the United States when he was 10 years old. 
In high school Juan decided what his calling was. It was military 
service. He became a leader in the Air Force Junior ROTC in his high 
school, group commander, and armed drill team captain, and he rose to 
the rank of cadet lieutenant colonel.
  This photo is of Juan in uniform in high school. His dream was to 
attend

[[Page S551]]

the Air Force Academy. Of course, it is a dream that couldn't happen. 
He is undocumented. Instead, he enrolled in Arizona State University.
  In 2010 Juan Rios graduated from Arizona State University. What 
course did he study? It was a degree in aeronautical engineering. He is 
some student.
  This is a picture of him at his graduation. But after he graduated 
with his degree in engineering, he didn't know which way to turn. He 
couldn't enlist in the military like he wanted to. He couldn't work as 
an engineer because he was undocumented. His talents were wasted. He 
sent me a letter at that time and said:

       The United States of America is the country I want to live 
     my life in, where I want to flourish as a productive citizen, 
     where I want to grow old among my lifelong friends and where 
     I want to one day fall in love and raise a family.

  So what happened to Juan after DACA, when the Executive order gave 
him the opportunity to have temporary protection and not be deported? 
In February 2013, after signing up for DACA, he interviewed for his 
first engineering job. Today Juan is working as a mechanical engineer 
in the semiconductor industry.
  At the age of 27 he learned how to drive and bought his first car. 
After living in Arizona for 17 years, he was finally able to visit the 
Grand Canyon for the first time.
  Juan sent a letter to me last week and said:

       I am fortunate to have found the opportunity to prove 
     myself as a professional and to work in a place where I feel 
     my contributions are valued and recognized. The past two 
     years have changed my life in every way imaginable. I think 
     DACA is a responsibility, a privilege, and an opportunity for 
     everyone who receives it to demonstrate that we as a 
     community of Dreamers have so much to contribute to society.

  Juan Rios is trying to prove to everyone that he is worth this 
investment, that he is worth this trust. He has done it. He will 
continue to do it.
  So why in the world do the House Republicans want to deport Juan 
Rios? Why do they want to give up on this young man, with his idealism, 
his determination, and his record of accomplishment? Why do they want 
him to leave the United States of America?
  Well, it is because he was brought here as a 5-year-old--
undocumented. For that decision by his parents, the House Republicans 
would say: We have no use for Juan Rios. We don't want him to stay.
  There are so many other stories similar to this one. It is clear that 
DACA works for America. I have been to Chicago so many times and met 
with these DREAMers. I know these young men and women. I believe in 
them, and I believe they are going to make a difference in this 
country.
  I also want to remind my friends on the Republican side of the aisle 
that America is a nation of immigrants. Our diversity is our strength. 
We come to this great country from so many different places, and we 
bring so many different cultures, languages, religions, ethnic 
backgrounds, and cuisines. We bring it all here, and we make it part of 
America's future.
  I know a little bit about this story because my mother was an 
immigrant herself. She was brought here at the age of 2. Today I stand 
on the floor of the Senate representing the great State of Illinois. 
That is my story. That is my family story. That is America's story.
  There is something else I would say to the critics of immigrants. 
Immigrants bring something special to America. Each one of these 
immigrant families took the greatest risk of their lives to come to 
America. Some of them literally risked their lives to do it. Others 
came to this country where they didn't speak the language, knew very 
few people, and didn't have any idea what their future would be. But 
they had heard about this America place, and they believed this was a 
better opportunity for them and for their kids. I am sure that is what 
brought my family to this country--my mother to this country--and I am 
sure that is what has brought a lot of people.
  That is part of our DNA. Those immigrants, their courage, and their 
determination to be part of America and its future really bring to this 
country an energy that just can't be matched in many other places in 
the world.
  House Republicans would kill that dream, and they have showed us that 
by this horrible amendment they have attached to the Department of 
Homeland Security appropriations.
  They think America is stronger if we tell Juan Rios to leave. I 
don't. It is shameless to play politics with the life of this young man 
and hundreds of thousands of others. It is just shameless to put 
homeland security funding at risk, to punish Juan Rios for having been 
brought to this country as a child.
  The House Republicans feel so strongly about deporting DREAMers they 
are willing to hold up the homeland security funding bill. The House 
Republicans are telling the Senate and the President: Deport the 
DREAMers or we are going to shut down the agency responsible for 
protecting America from terrorism.
  I hope the Senate majority leader will reject this blackmail, and I 
hope that in the spirit of the Senate, where we came together on a 
bipartisan basis to pass immigration reform almost 2 years ago, we will 
reject this hate-filled message from the House Republicans.
  For our part, Senate Democrats will insist that the Department of 
Homeland Security be funded and that the President have the authority--
which every President has had--to establish his own immigration 
policies.
  I see there is another colleague on the floor. I yield the floor.

                          ____________________