[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 146 (Wednesday, December 3, 2014)]
[House]
[Pages H8276-H8277]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ASSESSMENTS IN EDUCATION
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from
Oregon (Ms. Bonamici) for 5 minutes.
Ms. BONAMICI. Mr. Speaker, I am here this morning to discuss an
important issue that we hear about when we talk with teachers, parents,
students, and school administrators. In conversation after
conversation, they have expressed concern about what seems like an
endless stream of tests that, in many cases, do little, if anything, to
improve learning or classroom instruction.
Of course, assessments play an important role in education, and high-
quality assessments are valuable for informing meaningful instruction.
Nonetheless, too much time is devoted to redundant, low-quality, or
unnecessary tests.
In many cases, teachers administer tests, but the results aren't made
available for months, and hardworking educators have little opportunity
to design individualized support based on the results of those tests.
Furthermore, some of the tests are redundant. They take up time that
could be used on meaningful instruction, use resources best spent
elsewhere, and cause students undue stress. In other schools, too much
time is dedicated to preparing for tests that are not well-aligned with
State standards. Simply put, unnecessary assessments have hindered our
progress as a global leader in education.
We know that the Federal Government mandates several tests each year,
and States and school districts often require even more tests. Does
this all make sense? Do all of these tests improve instruction, improve
public education?
Today, I rise to discuss legislation that I am working on to help
States and local districts implement good, reliable assessments aligned
to standards, and importantly, eliminate redundant, poor-quality
assessments that take valuable time from teachers and students, time
that could be used on meaningful instruction.
We don't need more tests. We need better tests. My bill will use an
existing grant to provide States with funding to develop assessment
systems that ensure the best use of students' test results and that
align assessments with college and career-ready standards.
The transition to rigorous content standards is hard work, and my
bill will support States as they implement high-quality assessments
linked to those standards.
Working with local educational agencies, States will create
assessment plans outlining how they will improve the quality of their
tests, how they will use the assessment data, and how they will make
the data more accessible to educators, students, and parents.
This legislation will also support States and local districts that
want to lead the way on developing more sensible assessment systems.
States will be able to volunteer to audit their assessment systems and
use the results to design plans to eliminate unnecessary and redundant
testing.
[[Page H8277]]
Many State school chiefs and district superintendents have recently
made a commitment to this effort. My legislation will make available
much-needed Federal support.
{time} 1015
The focus in the classroom should be on the student. This bill will
help States improve their assessments and make better use of the
results, so they can draw valuable conclusions about students and give
educators the data they need, so they can do what they do best: teach.
Ultimately, we must address the culture of testing that has created
stress for students, parents, and teachers. This bill is a strong first
step. It keeps control in the hands of the States and school districts,
and it provides the funding to streamline assessment systems and make
sure that the remaining assessments are high quality and useful.
My bill offers this support through an existing funding stream, and
it will help put the focus back on our students. I urge my colleagues
to support this bill.
____________________