[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 138 (Thursday, November 13, 2014)]
[House]
[Pages H7943-H7944]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) for 5 minutes.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, there were many close elections across
America last week, but there was one clear winner: ending our failed
prohibition on marijuana and instead legalizing, regulating, and taxing
adult use.
Alaska and the District of Columbia voters joined Colorado and
Washington from 2 years earlier with strong votes to legalize. Nowhere
was that more emphatic than in my home State of Oregon. Marijuana
legislation passed in Oregon by a greater margin than it did in
Washington and Colorado. It got more votes than United States Senator
Jeff Merkley, who was overwhelmingly reelected. And this was in a low-
turnout, non-Presidential year, which experts predicted would depress
the ``yes'' vote.
In a few minutes, I will be joined in a press conference with Eleanor
Holmes Norton, whose constituents resoundingly approved legalization,
and will make the case that Congress needs to stay out of the way of
its implementation. Jared Polis, who has been my partner on efforts at
modernizing and reforming marijuana laws, will give a snapshot on the
progress in Colorado 2 years after legalization. Congressman Dana
Rohrabacher from southern California, the first State to legalize
medical marijuana 18 years ago, has been a tireless champion of the
Federal Government not interfering with decisions of local voters to
modernize and reform local marijuana laws. He has helped dozens of his
Republican colleagues understand and support marijuana and hemp reform.
Perhaps just as important as those votes that passed was one that
failed: the vote to legalize medical marijuana that failed in Florida.
But it should be noted that it garnered 57 percent of statewide voters,
again, in a low-turnout, non-Presidential election where many of the
people, polls show, who
[[Page H7944]]
were supporters did not bother to vote. It got more votes than any
statewide candidate in Florida on the ballot this year. Because it was
a constitutional amendment that requires a 60 percent voter approval
level, it was not approved at this time. But there is no question that
medical marijuana is in the immediate future for Floridians. If it were
back on the ballot in a Presidential year, it would exceed the 60
percent threshold.
In the meantime, we are going to work hard to implement the Oregon
law and take advantage of the next 2 years to learn from the experience
of others and refine our approach. We will raise new revenues to help
education, addiction treatment, and law enforcement. And most
important, we have already stopped prosecuting people for items that
will be legal under the law, and we will be better able to protect our
kids than the current vast underground black market.
Now Congress needs to do its part. We need to act now in Congress to
solve two serious problems, not just for those States that have
legalized adult use but the 23 States and counting that have legalized
medical marijuana.
A narrow reading of Federal banking regulations requires that these
perfectly legal marijuana businesses be on an all-cash basis.
Restricting them from having bank accounts is absolutely insane,
unfair, and unwise if you care about money laundering, tax evasion, or
theft.
Additionally, I have legislation that will permit legal marijuana
businesses to be able to deduct their business expenses from their
income tax. Because of the quirk in the law--the 280E provision--small
and emerging businesses face punitive Federal taxation that is unfair,
unwise, and certainly unjustified. Regardless of how people feel about
legalizing marijuana, these businesses are here--and here to stay.
Passing H.R. 2240 and H.R. 2652 will help treat this emerging sector
of the economy fairly and further protect the public. I am hopeful that
as the reality of these elections and future changes set in, we will be
able to do a better job of permitting them to operate and allow this
rapidly emerging area of commerce to serve the public and thrive.
____________________