[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 134 (Thursday, September 18, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5846-S5847]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, as the Senate prepares to go into recess,
Senate Republicans are refusing to allow confirmation votes on the more
than 20 judicial nominees who will now be stuck in limbo for months.
There is no good reason why the Senate cannot confirm these nominees
before the recess other than wholesale obstruction of a co-equal branch
of government's nominees.
The Senate Republicans' baseless obstruction includes blocking from
consideration nominations made to their home States. Right now, there
are five nominations pending to fill judicial emergency vacancies in
Kentucky and Georgia, which have gone unfilled for years. The
Republican Senators from these States have come out in strong support
for the nominees from their respective States. Yet the Republican
leadership refuses to agree to schedule votes on these or any other
nominations. This is simply delay for delay's sake.
Currently on the Senate Executive Calendar are qualified nominees to
fill Federal trial court vacancies in Kentucky, Georgia, the District
of Columbia, Wisconsin, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
Connecticut, and Missouri. All but two of the nominees were reported by
the Senate Judiciary Committee with bipartisan support. I wonder what
the constituents of these States think is causing this delay? I can
assure you it is not Senate Democrats.
This Republican pattern of refusing to confirm noncontroversial,
consensus nominees has gone on for the duration of this Presidency. I
have sought to remind my fellow Senators that their refusal to confirm
these nominations prior to an extended recess is an unfortunate
departure from Senate tradition. Time and again I have urged Senate
Republicans to stop their obstructive practices and delay tactics. And
once again, I am disappointed to see partisanship and senseless
obstruction continue to keep the Senate from fulfilling its
constitutional duty of advice and consent.
It is true that since the beginning of this year we have reduced the
vacancies on our Federal courts from 92 to 59, but no Senator should
believe that our work is done. Even if we were to confirm the more than
20 judicial nominees currently pending on the Senate floor, the Federal
judiciary remains significantly understaffed. The Judicial Conference
has identified the need for 91 new judgeships in some of America's
judicial districts and circuits with the highest caseloads. Last year,
Senator Coons and I introduced the Federal Judgeship Act of 2013 to
enact these recommendations into law. The timely administration of
justice should not be a partisan issue. It is an issue that affects all
Americans, and the Senate should take it seriously by passing this
bill.
The recommendations of the Judicial Conference underscore the need
for the Senate to fulfill its obligations to the Federal judiciary and
the American people. I have heard some Republican Senators claim the
opposite by citing the total number of judicial confirmation under this
President. It is true that the Senate has now confirmed 278 of
President Obama's circuit, district, and U.S. Court of International
Trade nominees, compared to 254 confirmations at the same point in the
last administration. Yet these numbers are meaningless without
providing their proper context. These confirmations were sorely needed.
There remain 59 vacancies on the Federal bench--far more than the 45
vacancies at this point during the Bush administration. There are an
additional 25 announced future judicial vacancies on our Federal courts
that will also need to be filled in the coming months. If you care
about providing our co-equal branch of government with the resources it
needs to serve its constitutional role, then it is important to look at
the number of vacancies that still exist and how long some of them have
remained empty.
Vacancies remain high not because of a failure of Senate Democrats or
President Obama to make judicial confirmations a priority. These
vacancies persist because of the endless obstruction of partisan
Republicans who take every opportunity they can to shut down the
important work of the Senate. Last year, no longer content to block
individual judges, Senate Republicans attempted a wholesale filibuster
of three
[[Page S5847]]
nominees to the D.C. Circuit, without even considering their
qualifications. Then, instead of confirming the consensus judicial
nominees pending on the Executive Calendar prior to the end of the
congressional session, Republicans forced the President to renominate
each nominee and for the Senate Judiciary Committee to report them
again this year.
In 2014, Senate Republicans have proceeded to filibuster each and
every judicial nominee. The Senate has taken 62 cloture votes on
judicial nominations so far this year, amounting to well over 400
wasted hours that the Senate should have been spending considering
legislation to help the American people. Never before has the Senate
seen the systematic filibuster of every judicial nominee or such unfair
treatment of qualified, consensus nominees.
The Senate should act quickly to confirm the judicial nominees
pending on the Senate floor. Because Republican obstruction will
prevent us from finishing our work before the elections, we must return
to session as soon as possible after the elections in November to
complete our important work. The American people deserve courts capable
of providing access to swift justice, not empty courtrooms and delays.
____________________