[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 123 (Friday, August 1, 2014)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1325-E1326]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                SECURE THE SOUTHWEST BORDER ACT OF 2014

                                 ______
                                 

                               speech of

                        HON. SHEILA JACKSON LEE

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                        Thursday, July 31, 2014

  Ms. JACKSON LEE. Madam Speaker, I rise to speak in strong opposition 
to H.R. 5230, a bill to make supplemental appropriations for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2014 to address the humanitarian crisis on 
our nation's southern border.
  As a senior member of the House Committee on Homeland Security and 
the Ranking Member on the Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security, 
I have visited the border and seen the children that this bill intends 
to help.
  This bill offers too little in funding to address the need that over 
50 states are attempting to address by providing shelter and assistance 
to the tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors who are now living in 
our country.
  Over two-thirds of the language in H.R. 5230 will make significant 
changes in existing law or creates new law regarding immigration policy 
without going through the committees of jurisdiction such as the House 
Committees on Homeland Security, Judiciary, and Foreign Affairs.
  H.R. 5230 contains too much language that is legislative such as:
  The bill makes significant changes to 2008 Trafficking Victims 
Protection Act. This change will subject all children to the initial 
screening process that now applies only to children from Mexico and 
Canada; erects a new expedited immigration court screening for any 
children who pass the initial screening; prohibits administrative 
appeals from children ordered removed through the new expedited 
process; requires detention of certain children who demonstrate a 
credible fear of persecution throughout the pendency of their asylum 
proceedings; establishes new, high burdens of proof; and sets up a 
principle of ``Last In, First Out'' in the adjudication process.
  The bill prohibits the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture 
from impeding, denying, or restricting the activities of U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection on Federal land located within 100 Miles of the 
U.S./Mexico border--This issue has already been addressed. Both 
Interior and Agriculture have existing Memorandum of Understanding 
(MOUs) with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and all these agencies, 
as well as the GAO, have testified that these agreements are working 
and that federal land management laws and activities do not impair 
border security.
  The bill provides too few emergency immigration judges--the bill only 
requires the Department of Justice to designate up to 40 temporary 
immigration judges within 14 days of enactment of this legislation. 
Then the bill permits hiring of retired judges or magistrate judges, or 
the reassignment of current immigration judges, to conduct expedited 
hearings for unaccompanied alien children to try to meet the new 
requirement that their cases be heard within 7 days of being screened 
by DHS officials.
  This is a rushed process for an emergency situation involving 
children. They require our best efforts to ensure their safety and 
wellbeing not a rushed job.
  The bill undermines a long standing policy regarding asylum--H.R. 
5230 Prohibits anyone believed to have been convicted outside the U.S. 
of any drug-related offense punishable by a prison term of more than a 
year from being granted asylum.
  This provision has nothing to do with unaccompanied children entering 
the United States and clearly is an immigration reform that would 
impact several committees such as the House Committees on Judiciary and 
Foreign Affairs.
  This provision is problematic because what is considered unlawful in 
one country is a constitutionally protected right in the United States. 
Often people are fleeing religious, ethnic or political persecution.
  Persecution means that they are experiencing or have experienced 
actions taken by their countries governments, which often includes 
imprisonment or torture while in custody.
  This one change would hand repressive regimes like North Korea with 
an easy way to block the United States from helping those seeking to 
escape that country--charge and convict them of a felon.
  A Sudanese woman was sentenced to death for being a Christian--would 
this Congress bar her entry into the United States?
  The bill makes the wrong decision on border security by sending the 
National Guard support for border operations--H.R. 5230 would deploy 
National Guard under Title 32 Status. National Guard troops with this 
change may be assigned duties as deemed necessary to provide assistance 
in operations, with priority given to high traffic areas experiencing 
the highest number of crossing by unaccompanied children.
  Sending armed soldiers to greet children escaping violence--Mr. 
Speaker what is the leadership thinking?
  These children need our help not frightening images of more adults 
with guns.
  The bill denies safe shelter to children through its sense of 
Congress--the states that the Secretary of Defense should not be 
allowed to shelter unaccompanied children or other migrants unless 
certain conditions are met.
  The military and the administration are well aware of the conditions 
that are acceptable for children and this Congress should provide what 
is needed so that their needs can be met.
  This bill does too little to actually help the thousands of children 
who are awaiting immigration hearings. They are victims of human 
trafficking, sexual violence, and witnesses to murders as well as acts 
of violence against other children who took that dangerous trek to the 
United States.
  We should be focused on learning what they know and what they 
experienced to be sure the guilty are found and punished.
  I offered, along with several other members of the House amendments 
in attempts to improve the bill, but all were rejected by the Rules 
Committee, which chose to place H.R. 5230 before the House in the form 
of a closed rule.
  The Jackson Lee Amendment would have authorized designated federal 
agencies to reimburse State and local governments and private nonprofit 
organizations for the costs incurred in providing psychological 
counseling, housing, education, medicine and medical care, food and 
water, clothes, personal hygiene and other indispensable consumables, 
other human services in response to the humanitarian crisis on the 
Southwest Border.
  This Congress has had the Senate's version of a Comprehensive 
Immigration reform bill for nearly a year, without accomplishing the 
task of taking up the issue and passing a House version.
  Our nation's immigration system is broken and needs reform, but the 
only attempt at addressing immigration into the United States is this 
bill that is being presented as an appropriations bill.
  H.R. 5230 is not an appropriations bill it is an immigration reform 
bill, which covers the jurisdictions of the two committees I serve on--
the House Judiciary and Homeland Security Committees. Neither of these 
committees were given the opportunity to hold hearings or make the 
needed changes to the bill to make sure it conforms with long standing 
policies relating to unaccompanied minor or issues related to refugees.
  The Jackson Lee amendment would have helped nonprofits, local and 
state governments in all of the 50 states who are now providing 
assistance to the tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors within the 
United States.
  The message has gotten to families in El Salvador, Honduras, and 
Guatemala. Parents are no longer sending their children to the United 
States once they learned of the dangers and the prospects for their 
children surviving the journey without becoming victims of human 
trafficking.

[[Page E1326]]

  These children have found the compassion and love of thousands of 
Americans found in the states of Texas, Alabama, Alaska, California, 
Illinois, North Carolina, South Dakota, New York, Utah, Virginia and--
yes even the U.S. Virgin Islands.
  The nature of America is that of the Good Samaritan.
  On July 3, 2014, I went to McAllen, Texas and observed a Customs and 
Border Protection (CBP) facility where unaccompanied children were 
being processed by the Border Patrol.
  As I walked through the facility, I saw frightened and needy 
children, some as young as five years old.
  Madam Speaker, some members of this body who have not taken the time 
to visit the border or visit the children who are now in their own 
states will stand before this body and accuse them of being dangerous--
but they are not.
  They are traumatized and frightened children driven from their homes 
by violence and inducements of these same gangs to get payments from 
desperate parents seeking to save the lives of their children to bring 
them to the United States.
  These children had risked their lives to make their way to the U.S. 
by riding atop freight trains through dangerous territories in Mexico. 
One can only imagine the desperation and hopelessness that would prompt 
a parent to send their young child on such a treacherous journey.
  It takes courage and desperation to escape senseless violence and I 
know that is what Cuban Americans faced, and Christians, Jews and all 
other groups facing violence have endured.
  These are refugees and their status requires that the United States 
act appropriately.
  Some may mention that the United States has a quota on refugees that 
we can take each year and that number has been reached. The program 
that refer to is for refugees that other nations around the world are 
providing shelter--but if the refugees are crossing our own border 
there is not limit.
  This international law that the United States has backed for decades 
and pressured other nations to enforce. If the refugees are Christians 
escaping ISIS or Boko Haram or they are children escaping violent gangs 
in Central America they are not and should not be turned back.
  Children do not leave their homes and families by the tens of 
thousands unless fear is driving them from their homes.
  Upon my visit to South Texas borders, I witnessed hundreds of 
children whose young faces were pressed against glass jails with tears 
running down their faces. We are dealing with helpless children who 
have traveled a treacherous journey, and it should be within our 
American values to care for these children who fled their homes to 
escape violence.
  These children are not perpetrators or criminals--they are in many 
cases victims fleeing deadly violence in Guatemala, Honduras, and El 
Salvador, and are seeking temporary safe haven in the United States, as 
so many people before them have done for centuries.
  The surge of unaccompanied children on our southern border does not 
pose a threat to our national security. Contrary to the shrill rhetoric 
used by some commentators, the nation is not being invaded by an army 
of children dispatched to do us harm.
  We are confronted instead with a humanitarian crisis resulting from 
the alarming scale of violence and economic desperation in three 
Central American countries that now lead the world in murder rates: El 
Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala.
  Politicizing the issue will not solve the problem. Taking actions 
that address the root causes in the short and long term will. We should 
be taking up Immigration Reform to deal with the wide range of 
immigration problems.
  The current status on the border is the number of children coming 
across the border has abated. Those children remaining in detention 
shelters along the border number only a few hundred.
  According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, these 
three Central American countries have among the highest per capita 
homicide rates in the world, with Honduras topping the list and the 
other two nations in the top five.
  To address this issue of the humanitarian crisis, I introduced H.R. 
4990, the ``Justice for Children Now Act of 2014,'' which authorizes 
the immediate hiring of an additional 70 immigration judges in the 
Executive Office of Immigration Review.
  This bill will help but it is not sufficient to address the backlogs 
to help advance the flow of the children's immigration court hearings.
  The amount allowed under this bill will leave states and aid agencies 
footing a significant portion of the cost for assisting these helpless 
children--when it is the role of the federal government to be present 
and actively engaged in leading the effort.
  I support the President's request for $3.7 billion to respond to the 
humanitarian crisis on the border and urge my colleagues in leadership 
to reconsider the level of funding for this great need.
  Congress should allocate the resources needed to deal with the 
increase in unaccompanied children seeking refuge in the United States. 
Some of these persons are attempting to enter the country unlawfully 
and without justification. Our laws do not permit this and they should 
not be allowed entry.
  The Administration is following immigration law as it relates to 
these unaccompanied minors.
  The Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, 
signed by President George W. Bush establishes the legal status of the 
children who have entered the nation unaccompanied.
  That law provides persons fleeing lethal violence or escape from 
human trafficking the opportunity to have their case heard by an 
immigration judge.
  Over the time Congress has delayed acting and an additional 366,000 
pending cases were added to the immigration courts that must have 
hearings before any action can be taken.
  Because this situation is untenable for everyone--law enforcement, 
taxpayers, and individuals petitioning for relief, the first thing that 
we can and should do to reduce the backlog is provide the funding 
needed to appoint 70 new immigration judges, as provided under 
legislation.
  Ensuring that there are available sufficient facilities to house 
detained children in a humane manner while they await their immigration 
hearing is another challenge.
  I ask that the Rules Committee approve the Jackson Lee Amendment for 
inclusion in H.R. 5230.

                          ____________________