[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 106 (Wednesday, July 9, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4296-S4297]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AFGHANISTAN
Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, I have just returned from Afghanistan,
where I met with the two Presidential candidates, Dr. Ashraf Ghani and
Dr. Abdullah. Both Dr. Ghani and Dr. Abdullah are impressive men who
have committed to reformist agendas and campaigned throughout the
country. Afghanistan is fortunate to have two such capable Presidential
candidates.
In the course of my meetings with the two candidates last Sunday and
indeed during many meetings over the years, each has told me that he
appreciates the support the United States has provided to their
country, and each will sign a bilateral security agreement with the
United States as soon as possible after the next President is
inaugurated.
This is a particularly sensitive time for Afghanistan, which has not
had a peaceful transition of power in the 50 years since Zahir Shah was
overthrown in a coup. More than 7 million ballots were cast in the
first round of the Presidential election back in April, and more than 8
million ballots were recorded in the runoff election last month. All
agree there was an impressive turnout in a country where the Taliban
has repeatedly threatened violence against those who vote.
There have been dramatic improvements in Afghanistan over the last
decade in the number of schools and universities, in the number of
students and teachers--particularly female students and female
teachers--in Afghan life expectancy, in average income, and in many
other areas. The Afghan Army and the Afghan National Police, who have
taken over security responsibility from U.S. and coalition forces, have
shown great capability by successfully securing two rounds of elections
and repelling a concerted Taliban attack in the Helmand region of the
country.
If the ongoing dispute about the outcome of the Afghan Presidential
election is not resolved in a fair and credible manner, however, these
achievements would be at risk. The Taliban does not have the ability to
defeat the Afghan Army or to take over Afghan cities and population
centers. However, if a disputed election were to lead to infighting or
to the establishment of parallel governments, the army could be
severely weakened and divided, providing new opportunities for the
Taliban.
The United States and our coalition allies would be much less likely
to provide the continued military and economic assistance that
Afghanistan needs if that country's leaders cannot pull together and
resolve their disputes through the existing election process.
The State Department stated on Monday:
The continued support of the United States for Afghanistan
requires that Afghanistan remains united and that the result
of this election is deemed credible.
Both candidates told me personally on Sunday that they believe a
comprehensive audit of the election results is necessary and
appropriate and that they will abide by the results of such an audit.
They also stated that they understand the outcome of the election will
not be final and will not be credible until such an audit has been
completed.
The two campaign teams have been working with the United Nations and
other international elections experts over the last few days to develop
an appropriate audit scope to recommend to the elections commission. I
had hoped that an agreement on this review could be announced at the
same time that a preliminary vote count was released on Monday. While
that did not happen, the head of the Independent Election Commission
said the following:
The announcement [of] preliminary results does not mean the
winner has been announced. The investigation of votes could
have impacts on the final results.
The two campaigns have already agreed on audit triggers that will
result in the review of nearly half of the ballots cast, but they have
not yet reached full agreement on the measures to be taken. I hope they
will be able to do so in the very near future. But this is the bottom
line: Whether or not they are able to reach agreement in full, the
Electoral Complaints Commission, working with the Independent Election
Commission, has a responsibility to decide how many ballots to audit,
and they have that responsibility on their own initiative. The
Independent Election Commission must then announce a winner.
The path to resolution of the matter is not unclear. On the contrary,
the Afghan Constitution and election law are very clear. There is no
uncertainty about this path. The Independent Election Commission and
the Electoral Complaints Commission have the responsibility to proceed
on their own to determine how many ballots need to be audited and to
conduct an audit with or without the agreement of the candidates.
Indeed, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan has
already called on the election commissions to do just that.
I said to the two candidates on Sunday that the Afghan people and the
Afghan security forces have shown great bravery in standing up for
their country and that it is now time for the country's leaders to do
the same. It would be truly unfortunate if the great progress made in
Afghanistan at the expense of so much Afghan, American, and coalition
blood and treasure were to be jeopardized by political infighting and
the failure of political leadership.
Mr. President, I yield the floor, and I note the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
[[Page S4297]]
____________________