[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 106 (Wednesday, July 9, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4291-S4292]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ISRAEL
Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, I rise to dispel a dangerous notion,
one I have seen too frequently in newspapers, heard on TV and among
people, commentators and others in the wake of the violence in Israel.
The dangerous notion is that there is a moral equivalence between the
actions and reactions of Israel and the Palestinian State to the
violence and response in the Middle East--or the Palestinian people
more so than the State. It must be said there is no moral equivalence
between the actions and reactions of Israel and Hamas and the
Palestinian Authority to the violence that has occurred there.
Two instances make that very clear. We all witnessed terrible
tragedies occurring in that tortured region of the
[[Page S4292]]
world. We are now all familiar with both the kidnapping and cold-
blooded murder of three Israeli boys and, in what seems to be payback,
the killing of a young Palestinian teenager. Both were abhorrent--both
were abhorrent--and the losses of the families on both sides cannot be
understated, but I think what we ought to focus on--we all know each
side has its fanatics. Each side experiences tragedy of the highest
order. What I am saying does not apply to all the people on either
side, particularly the Palestinian side, but the reaction is what
counts.
What was the reaction among too many Palestinians to the murder of
these three boys? They were almost exultant. They were treated as
heroes. The mother of one of the supposed murderers, people who are
suspected of the murder of the Israelis, Abu Aysha, said: ``If he [my
son] truly did it--I'll be proud of him till my final day.'' That is
what she said: ``I'll be proud. . . . ''
Those who were purported to kill the three Israelis were regarded as
heroes, not just among a small segment in the West Bank and in Gaza but
among large numbers of people. There were parades. They were honored.
That was the reaction.
Let's compare that to Israel's reaction when a group of Israeli
fanatics killed the Palestinian teenager. The Israeli people, in large
part, were aghast. They said we have to find who did it and bring them
to justice. Prime Minister Netanyahu called them terrorists, those who
might have killed that Palestinian, equal to the terrorism on the other
side of the three who killed the Israelis.
Israel made every effort to find those and have now made arrests.
While the leader of the Palestinian Authority condemned the killing of
the three Israeli boys, there was no such effort on the Palestinian
side to find those who did it, to bring them to justice. There were no
calls of universal condemnation.
How can we compare the two sides? How can people say: Oh, the
Israelis. Oh, the Palestinians. It is one big fight. They are all the
same.
It is not. Again, regretfully, there are fanatics on both sides, and
I abhor the Israeli fanatics. They make things bad for the vast
majority of Israelis who want to live in peace in a two-state solution,
but the vast majority of Israelis condemn the Jewish fanatics. The vast
majority of Palestinians seem to praise the Palestinian terrorists.
Hamas, one of the two main governing organizations in Gaza and the West
Bank, loudly praises the kidnapping and killing of the three Israeli
boys.
Is there moral equivalency here? Are both sides sort of acting the
same?
By the way, when you read Palestinian textbooks and go to schools and
read about what the children are taught--vitriolic hatred, not only of
Israel but of the Jewish people--you sometimes understand maybe why not
support but condemn and sort of gain some inkling of understanding of
why so many are filled with hatred. But who is putting out those
textbooks? Not just Hamas--the Palestinian Authority and many
Palestinian governing units.
So the reaction of Israel, its government and its society, to the
killing of an innocent Palestinian youth and the reaction of the
Palestinian authorities and people, in large part, to the killing of
three Israeli youths showed there is no moral equivalency because the
reaction was totally different.
Then let's take what happened yesterday. It is the same thing. You
read all the headlines, Israelis and Palestinians fighting with each
other, rockets sent on both sides, air raids sent on both sides, but
let's look at what happened. Hamas sent rockets into the heart of
Israel to kill innocent civilians--no warnings, not in response to
anything Israel did. They just decided to send these rockets. Some
commentators say it is because they are weak now that Egypt will no
longer let them get all those supplies through the tunnels.
What is Israel's response? Of course they have to eliminate the
rockets and rocket launchers, but what other society sends leaflets to
the houses that have these rocket launchers, saying: Please vacate.
What other society tries to call people on cell phones to say: Leave.
We have to get rid of the rocket launchers. We don't want to kill
innocent people.
That is what Israel did. Did Hamas send any warnings to the people of
Sderot or Beersheba or Jerusalem or Tel Aviv that they were going to
indiscriminately send rockets into civilian areas? No. Did Hamas do
this in response to Israel? No. So this idea again in the papers--oh,
both sides are fighting, what can we do, they are both sort of equally
wrong--is morally abhorrent to me and to many others.
There is, in conclusion, no moral equivalency, no moral equivalency
to weigh these two states and, frankly, in large part, with two
exceptions, how two societies react: the horrible murders of young
people, Israel, sad, condemning the Israelis who did it, and too many
Palestinians praising the Palestinians who did it. In response to
rockets sent into civilian areas, Israel tries to limit its response to
military targets and lets civilians who might be near those targets
know they should evacuate.
We all pray for peace in the Middle East. I certainly do. There has
been too much death, too much anguish, too much insecurity, but we are
not going to achieve peace by equating the two sides and saying they
are equivalent, morally or in any other way.
The steps the beleaguered nation of Israel takes to try and protect
itself are far different than so many of the aggressive actions of too
many on the Palestinian side, with too much support from too many of
the Palestinian people.
There is no moral equivalency.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alaska.
____________________