[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 101 (Thursday, June 26, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4126-S4127]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
JUNETEENTH REMEMBRANCE
Mr. COONS. Mr. President, last Friday was Juneteenth, which marks
four of the most important days in our Nation's long and continuing
march toward racial justice and civil rights in this country.
First, on June 19, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation
Proclamation abolished slavery in all U.S. territories. Then 3 years
later, a month after the end of our Civil War, Union soldiers arrived
in Galveston, TX, to free the last of our Nation's slaves. Nearly a
century later on June 19, 1963, with Jim Crow laws still a stain on the
moral fabric of our country, President John F. Kennedy sent his Civil
Rights Act of 1963 to Congress. And the following year, as the Nation
mourned JFK's loss, President Johnson shepherded the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 to final passage.
As we mark these days in our Nation's history, from the end of our
darkest period to some of the most important pieces of civil rights
legislation passed, we know we still have farther to go.
It is appropriate that we do so this year especially, that we mark
June 19 and these five moments across our Nation's history, because as
a result of the Supreme Court's decision last year, the Shelby County
case, a key piece of President Johnson's Voting Rights Act of 1965
stands in bad need of repair and revision; and, in fact, the Voting
Rights Act itself is at risk of becoming a dead letter in the future of
voting in our country.
Two years ago I had the opportunity to join many of my colleagues in
the House and the Senate, Republicans and Democrats, in returning to
Selma to the site of Bloody Sunday, to the march across the Edmund
Pettus Bridge. Many Members of Congress got a chance to hear again from
Congressman Lewis about the events of that day, that day that was
etched into the consciousness of this country and mobilized millions to
speak out to their representatives and Senators and move this Congress
finally to enact legislation that would unlock the key to the ballot
box across the country.
I was so proud earlier this year to join with Chairman Leahy of the
Senate Judiciary Committee and with Senator Dick Durbin, Congressman
Lewis, icon of the Civil Rights movement, Congressman John Conyers, and
Republican Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner, to introduce a bill that
would restore the core protections made possible in the original Voting
Rights Act.
The bill we introduced doesn't look at discrimination through the
lens of the past. It focuses on modern-day violations, not the things
that happened 50 years ago. It takes up the challenge laid down by the
Supreme Court and comes up with a new formula and a new approach that
makes voting rights and elections more transparent and has been
carefully crafted to be both effective and to pass this Congress. It is
a voting rights bill that is modern, to confront modern voting rights
challenges.
As a country we have come a long way since 1965, but we are not where
we need to be yet. As much as we don't want to admit it or confront it,
racial discrimination in voting is not a relic of the past, but a
tragic reality of today. Just yesterday the Senate Judiciary Committee
held a hearing on what to do to address the loss of a key part of the
Voting Rights Act that is known as preclearance.
In 2013 the Supreme Court struck down the heart of the Voting Rights
Act, a bill that each and every Senate Republican voted for in 2006.
Let me be clear about that. Again, in 2006 this body unanimously
reauthorized the Voting Rights Act. Yet in 2013 the Supreme Court
struck down an essential provision of that very act.
The Voting Rights Act and leadership to address the challenges of
civil rights in this country have long been bipartisan in nature. My
own family and friends who are Republicans are justifiably proud of
their party's leadership role in addressing the darkest days and the
biggest challenges in civil rights in the last century in this country.
But today we are struggling in this body to find a single Republican
cosponsor for this important and necessary bill. I ask my friends: Is
this because there is nothing that remains to be done? Is that 2006
act, unanimously passed by this body, so obsolete that there is no
legislative response necessary to Shelby?
I think a response is necessary. A month after the Supreme Court's
decision, North Carolina passed a restrictive, a deeply restrictive,
voting law that in addition to a strict photo ID requirement reduces
early voting and forbids local jurisdictions flexibility in setting
hours for early voting, among other restrictions. After the Shelby
County decision, in Pasadena, TX, that city's voters adopted a plan to
reduce the number of single-member districts from eight to six, adding
two at-large representatives, a change nearly certain to reduce Latino
representation on their city council. Hours after the decision, the
State of Texas announced plans to implement its photo ID law that had
long been blocked under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Again and
again, shortly following the Shelby County decision, jurisdictions
moved to implement discriminatory voting changes that had previously
been blocked under section 5. Something needs to be done. I would
suggest to my colleagues, if you don't like this proposal, please come
forward with something you can support, with something that looks
forward, not back; that has a formula that protects voting as the
[[Page S4127]]
most sacred and foundational right of our Republic and allows us to
come together. History will not look kindly on our inaction.
Two days ago we honored the memory of Dr. King and Coretta Scott King
with a Congressional Gold Medal. What better way to honor their legacy
than to come together and strengthen the rights they fought so hard to
secure for every American?
Voting is fundamental, and ensuring that every American has the right
to vote is at the core of what makes our democracy vibrant.
I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to come together and
to find a way forward for us to put voting rights first and to restore
the important legacy of June 19 from across so many incidents in so
many years and to move us forward on a positive path.
Thank you.
Mr. President, could I ask my colleague's indulgence for one last 2-
minute speech?
Mr. SESSIONS. Mr. President, I was to be recognized before, but I
will be glad to, but would like the 15 minutes or so I was allowed to
have even though it may back up after me.
So, Mr. President, I would ask unanimous consent that Senator Coons
be allowed an additional 2 minutes and I be allowed 15 minutes
thereafter.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Mr. COONS. I object, and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. COONS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that order for the
quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Markey). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________