[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 100 (Wednesday, June 25, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3991-S3994]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BIPARTISAN SPORTSMEN'S ACT OF 2014--Continued
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, equal time until
4:30 shall be divided between the two leaders or their designees.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Rhode Island.
Climate Change
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I have come here every week now for 72
consecutive weeks that the Senate has been in session to urge
colleagues to wake up to the growing threat of climate change. Today I
have the pleasure and honor of being joined by my friend and colleague
Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia.
I ask unanimous consent that the Senator from West Virginia and I be
allowed to engage in a colloquy for the time we have been allotted.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Senator Manchin and I come from very different parts
of the country. We are the Ocean State, he is the Mountain State. We
both came here today to say that climate change is real, that human
activities, including the burning of fossil fuels, are causing dramatic
changes to the Earth's atmosphere and oceans, and to seek responsible
solutions that will ensure reliable, sustainable energy for the United
States and protect our local communities and economies from the worst
effects of a changing climate, recognizing, as we must, that fossil
fuels will be part of America's fuel mix for decades.
The recent National Climate Assessment showed many effects of climate
change are already being seen across the United States. In my home
State of Rhode Island, we have Narragansett Bay, more than 3 degrees
warmer in the winter than it was 50 years ago. Measurements at the
Newport tide gauge show that as the seawater warms and expands, the sea
level is up almost 10 inches against our shores since the 1930s.
Extreme weather depends a lot on natural variability, but climate
change increases the odds that heat waves and heavy rain bursts will
occur. As the climate has warmed, some types of extreme weather have
become more frequent and severe. Here on this chart we see that in the
northeast, up here, the area which includes both Rhode Island and West
Virginia, between 1958 and 2010, the amount of rain coming in those big
downpours has gone up by 70 percent.
Let's remember how climate change affects the economy and jobs. For
example, fishermen in Rhode Island have seen their winter flounder
catch from Narragansett Bay nearly disappear in the recent decades as
the bay has warmed. These are not distant climate model projections,
this is now. This is happening to Rhode Island.
The people of West Virginia have Senator Manchin fighting for them
every day in Washington. I know he believes that we need to find
economically responsible answers to environmental problems. I am proud
to stand with him today as his friend and colleague.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from West Virginia.
[[Page S3992]]
Mr. MANCHIN. I thank the Chair.
I am pleased to join my friend Senator Whitehouse from the great
State of Rhode Island to talk about this important subject. In the
past, we may not always have agreed on how to approach this problem,
but at least we have come together to work on a solution together. That
is very important. That is a rare thing in Washington, as the Presiding
Officer knows. We are determined to see if we can find common ground to
move forward.
As the Senator suggested, the way we produce and consume energy in
our States is quite different. I am the Mountain State, he is the Ocean
State. Nonetheless, we both agree we need to strike a balance between
the economy and the environment. One cannot go it alone. It takes a
balance, if you will, in about anything we do in life, one that
acknowledges the reality of the climate change, while also
understanding that fossil fuels, more specifically coal that we produce
so much of in our State, is such a part of our economy, is a vital part
of our energy mix for decades to come. That is by the Department of
Energy, the EAI's own claim.
There is no doubt that 7 billion people have impacted our world's
climate. Those who deny that I believe are wrong. A lot of them are my
friends. I believe we have had an impact and we have a responsibility.
But we need to know what is going on and the facts we are dealing with
in the world today.
There are more than 8 billion tons of coal consumed around the world
each year. This gives an outline of where most of that coal is
consumed. Currently China burns more than 4 billion tons per year. They
are not stopping or letting up. If anything, they are increasing their
consumption and building more coal-fired plants as we speak, while the
United States and Europe each burn less than 1 billion tons. So the
United States of America, you could say, uses less than one-eighth of
the coal consumed annually in the world. If we stopped burning every
kind of coal, would that really clean up the climate? But if we find
ways to do it better, can we help the rest of the world clean up the
climate? That is what we are here to talk about.
There is a broad agreement in the scientific community that carbon
emissions and other human contributions are causing substantial changes
to the Earth's climate. According to the West Virginia State
Climatologist's Office, five of the six wettest years have occurred
since 1989; four have occurred since 1990.
Just as I do not deny the existence of climate change, my friend
Senator Whitehouse does not deny that eliminating coal from the energy
mix would hurt the reliability of our grid. He knows that you cannot do
it. We have got to work together to keep the reliability in the system,
which is so vital to people all over this country.
Without coal, the northeast United States would have suffered severe
and enduring power outages during last winter's polar vortex. If our
reliability had failed during the polar vortex we came through this
past year, there is no question people would have died--no question at
all.
Importantly, during that period of time, coal provided 92 percent of
the increase in energy needed to survive that disaster.
Coal was able to go online to back up the grid. Ninety-two percent of
it was driven by coal because it is dependable, reliable, and
affordable.
This chart shows basically the portion of increase in U.S.
electricity generation by fuel, January-February 2014, the times we
needed it most to keep the grid systems up and running. You can see
coal--92 percent--and natural gas fell because of distribution problems
we had. It will increase, it will get better as distribution and
infrastructure is built.
Oil, nuclear, hydro, renewable--you can see they weren't able to pick
up the demand that was needed or the load that was needed to keep the
system moving.
Nick Akins is the CEO of American Electric Power. He said this about
the polar vortex: ``This country did not just dodge a bullet--it dodged
a cannon ball''
We need to address climate change, but we need to do it while
maintaining the reliability of our electricity system. Senator
Whitehouse and I both realize that coal will remain a vital part of our
Nation's general portfolio for the foreseeable future.
According to the President's own Energy Information Administration--
the EIA--coal generated about 40 percent of all U.S. electricity in
2011. In 2040 coal will still generate more than 30 percent of the
domestic electricity that is needed.
This chart basically shows where we are going in the foreseeable
future. This is 2040. By 2040 natural gas will be at 35 percent, and
coal will still be at 32 percent--both, it can be said, out of fossil,
so you have 67 percent. Renewals increase to 16 percent. Nuclear is
going down to 16 percent, and I believe we have to reengage our efforts
there. I really do. So coal will assume the dominant world markets for
the foreseeable future.
According to EIA, coal provided 69 percent of China's energy
consumption in 2011. This chart gives a little bit of an idea of where
we are. China used four times the amount of coal used in the United
States that year. Coal supplied 41 percent of India's total energy
consumption. During that period of time, India used roughly the same
amount of coal as we did in the United States. By 2040 China will
produce 62 percent of its electricity from coal, while India will
produce 56 percent. During the next few years, some 1,200 new coal
plants are going to be built across 59 countries; 363 are going to be
built in China and 455 in India alone.
It is unbelievable when you look at more than 8 billion tons of coal
that are consumed around the world each year. China currently burns
more than 4 billion tons per year, while the United States and Europe
burn less than 1 billion tons. Use in these countries and in other
parts of the world is projected to grow dramatically for decades to
come.
The United States has already been a leader in proving to the world
that we can produce coal cleaner today. Traditional pollutants--sulfur,
mercury, nitrogen, and particulates--have been cut 80 percent in the
last several years. What is less known is that technologies are being
developed--and some already exist--that dramatically lower coal plant
carbon emissions.
With smarter investments from the public and private sectors, we will
not only finish the first generation of carbon capture, storage, and
utilization plants but also develop the second generation of these
technologies. When that happens in the not so distant future, we will
lead the world toward utilization of fossil fuels in a way that
produces negligible or zero harmful emissions.
With the right policies and the right coordination between the public
and private sectors, we can lead by example and show the world that we
can burn fossil fuels cleaner than ever. Most importantly, we can do
all of this while protecting consumers, creating jobs, and growing our
economy.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. I agree with my friend from West Virginia that we
must address climate change in a way that protects jobs in all sectors
and ensures grid stability.
Fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas are indeed going to be an
important part of America's energy mix for decades. So we need to
invest, as Senator Manchin has suggested, in reducing the carbon
pollution we generate from these sources.
We also need to adapt our power infrastructure to withstand the
effects of climate change. Extreme weather has become the main cause of
blackouts in the United States.
The President's Council of Economic Advisers and the Department of
Energy counted 679 widespread outages between 2003 and 2012 due to
severe weather. Fifty-eight percent of power outages since 2002 and 87
percent of outages affecting 50,000 or more customers were caused by
severe weather such as thunderstorms, hurricanes, and blizzards. The
average annual cost of power outages caused by severe weather is
between $18 billion and $33 billion per year. The U.S. Energy
Information Administration compiled data that is plotted on this chart
showing that weather-related power outages are already on the rise
since just the early nineties.
Addressing climate change is also important to grid stability.
We also should expand and modernize our electric grid. A smarter grid
will make it easier to respond to and recover from extreme weather
events,
[[Page S3993]]
will boost efficiency within the system, will help lower utility bills,
and will bring more renewable energy online.
In both our States, Senator Manchin and I realize it is in America's
interest to be leaders in the research, development, and deployment of
energy efficiency tools; in cleaner fossil fuel research; and in
renewable energy technologies--particularly ones we can export. I know
Senator Manchin has some of these technologies being rolled out in his
State.
Mr. MANCHIN. When I was Governor of West Virginia, we set and have
now achieved an alternative where we are going to reduce our carbon
footprint by 25 percent by using coal in a cleaner fashion and also
some of the other things we do, which I will explain. Not only did we
do it, we did it 10 years earlier than we had targeted. In 2013, 4.1
percent of West Virginia's energy already came from hydroelectric and
wind energy. Mount Storm Wind Farm--so many people don't know what we
have done in our little State because we are all in; we want to do it
all, and we are trying everything we have--is the second largest wind
farm east of the Mississippi, 17 miles across the beautiful landscape.
I also agree with Senator Whitehouse on the importance of energy
efficiency. With our friend Senator Hoeven of North Dakota, I have
introduced the All-Of-The-Above Federal Building Energy Conservation
Act, legislation that would improve the energy efficiency of all
Federal buildings and set an example for the private sector.
This legislation takes a commonsense, all-of-the-above approach to
the issue of Federal energy efficiency. I believe that by encouraging
the use of innovative technologies and practices, instituting
reasonable goals, and allowing building managers flexibility, we can
achieve better environmental stewardship in a cost-effective manner.
As Governors, Senator Hoeven--a Republican from North Dakota--and I
relied on common sense to guide our State policies, and this bill
applies that much needed common sense to Federal policies. We should be
using all of our abundant resources, including coal, to power our
Nation in the most efficient way possible. Our bill accomplishes this
goal and proves the Federal Government can lead the way in using fossil
fuels to achieve greater energy efficiency in a much cleaner fashion.
While efficiency and renewables are important, let me say again that
it is most important to reduce emissions from coal plants while keeping
them running well into the future. Advances in coal-use technologies
will continue to develop with help from the public sector.
Enhanced oil recovery is already developing into a valuable tool for
augmenting domestic oil production. We need Federal investments for
technology such as EOR.
Research is ongoing for the use of coal and CO2 for a
multitude of new energy and consumer products, including fertilizers,
liquid fuels, and plastic materials.
I just had a gentleman come to my office who basically makes carbon
out of coal which cleanses the water we drink.
So there are so many things. Senator Whitehouse is right. There are
so many things that we are using, and we can do a lot more.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Efficiency is something we take seriously in Rhode
Island as well.
In 2013 the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy ranked
Rhode Island as the sixth most energy efficient State in the country.
The Energy Information Administration in 2011 ranked Rhode Island the
lowest in energy consumption--which, as the Presiding Officer from the
small State of Delaware can understand, we have a bit of an unfair
advantage--but we were also the sixth lowest in total energy costs per
capita. We do our part to save energy, avoid emissions, lower costs,
and reduce the demand and stress on the electric grid.
Rhode Island and eight other States participate in the Regional
Greenhouse Gas Initiative--we call it ``Reggi''--which caps carbon
emissions and sells permits to emit greenhouse gases to powerplants.
One of the ways Rhode Island has been able to drive down our energy
consumption and our utility bills is by investing the money generated
through RGGI into energy efficiency. Rhode Island invests over 91
percent of its RGGI proceeds in energy efficiency projects and
improvements, helping residents save money on their utility bills and
making small businesses more competitive.
Rhode Island is also poised to gain scores of jobs from the
development of offshore wind. I think we have the advantage on West
Virginia in offshore wind. Our private developer of offshore wind,
Deepwater Wind, has received its first major environmental permit to
begin deployment in the Block Island wind farm area.
The price of wind energy has decreased over 90 percent since the
early 1980s and is now competitive in the energy markets. I am working
to make wind energy more a part of our energy portfolio.
At the Federal level, our energy policy must use the best science
available to improve the way we use fossil fuels, and our Tax Code
should help address climate change while leveling the playing field for
various energy sources.
I believe carbon-driven climate change hurts our economy, damages our
infrastructure, and harms public health. Yet those costs are not
factored into the cost of fossil fuels. That means the cost of the
pollution has been borne by the public. I believe we should adopt a
carbon fee to correct this market failure and return all its revenue to
the American people--what Republican supporters of a carbon fee call
revenue neutral.
On a smaller scale, Congress can also extend the renewable energy tax
credits and other measures that are supported by Members on both sides
of the aisle, helping renewable energy in West Virginia and a
bipartisan array of States.
Mr. MANCHIN. The Senator and I disagree on a few things, but I
adamantly disagree with my dear friend Senator Whitehouse regarding the
wisdom of a carbon fee or so-called carbon tax. But I do agree that we
can use the Tax Code and other Federal tax incentives to help clean up
fossil fuels. That is why we are here together to find a pathway.
First, the DOE must approve $8 billion in loan guarantees for
advanced fossil fuel projects that they have had available since 2005.
None of it has been invested to try to help use the fuel that we depend
on--coal--in a much better, cleaner fashion. Also, I found out that we
also have $3.2 billion from the stimulus money to be used for shovel-
ready coal projects that is still sitting and hasn't been invested. So
there is a lot we can do without appropriating any new money, just
using the money that is there for the purpose it was intended.
New tax incentives could be employed to incentivize providers to
update sub-critical plants to the super- and ultra-super-critical
configurations that pave the way for CCS.
Finally, we need to incentivize the second generation of CCS
technology, the one that holds the future for promise of coal use with
negligible emissions.
What are we talking about? Carbon capture sequestration, just being
used for that purpose, if you don't have a secondary source to where
you can put it and sell it for enhanced oil recovery, as we call it--
the technology that we could use in the shale that maybe can enhance
the gas from the shale, the Utica and Marcellus that we have in West
Virginia--so much could have been done that we haven't done. Maybe we
could solidify the carbon and use it as a spent fuel. These are things
we need to get to, and this money lying right now in the Department of
Energy for almost 10 years needs to be invested.
With the help of Senator Whitehouse, I can only think that we can
move forward and find a solution.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. I agree with the distinguished Senator from West
Virginia that the Department of Energy's advanced fossil projects loan
guarantee program has not yet lived up to, at this time, its potential.
I will work with him to push the administration to accelerate its
use.
I wish to close my share of this colloquy by noting something very
basic; that is, that America has long stood before the world as an
exceptional country and deservedly so. America proved the case for
popular sovereignty
[[Page S3994]]
with no need of kings or crowns. America took our balanced market
capitalism and rose to international economic dominance. America has
long been the vanguard of civil and human rights for our people and
around the globe. When American military power must be used, we don't
conquer and rule. We come home. This exceptional nature confers upon us
a responsibility to lead, to be an example, to be, as President Reagan
said, ``a shining city on a hill.''
Our generation will be judged by whether we were responsible about
climate change, whether we listened, and whether we led.
Senator Manchin and I are both committed to the idea that American
innovation can create the clean energy technologies of the future, so
that when it comes to addressing the biggest problems facing our world,
the United States should be out front, and we are committed to working
together to find responsible solutions to the climate crisis.
We also realize we have different perspectives on what those
solutions should look like. I live in a State that is harmed by carbon
pollution, and Senator Manchin is from a State that sees economic
benefit from coal. We believe we could both learn more about those
different perspectives. So I am committing to travel with Senator
Manchin to West Virginia to see the coal plants that power many parts
of our country and meet the people there working to curb pollution and
improve efficiency, and I invite Senator Manchin to Rhode Island to see
how climate change is taking its toll on our shorelines and marine
industries.
America is still a beacon to the world because ultimately we have the
ability to work through disagreements to common ground on a shared
platform of fact. With the commitment of serious leaders such as
Senator Manchin, I am confident we can move forward to an energy future
that preserves the economy and quality of life in West Virginia, in
Rhode Island, and for all Americans.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator's time has expired.
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that Senator
Manchin have such time as he needs to conclude his colloquy.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. MANCHIN. Mr. President, I thank the Senator. Again, I say to my
good friend Senator Whitehouse from Rhode Island, I look forward to
coming to his beautiful State of Rhode Island and seeing all of what
they are doing and the efficiencies they have and technology they are
incorporating. I also look forward to showing him my State, the
beautiful State of West Virginia, and its great people.
We have both visited each other's States before, so we know how good
our States are. It is going to be great to revisit.
I thank the Senator also for joining me on the floor as we continue
to have this extremely important dialogue. If Senator Whitehouse and I
can start looking for a pathway, I am sure friends from both sides of
the aisle can join us. That is what we are trying to have happen.
I agree with Senator Whitehouse, the United States of America has
long stood before the world as an exceptional country that people look
up to. We have reigned as the dominant world power and have played the
role of the world's leader for more than 200 years.
Coal use is expanding across the globe, and we need to face that
reality--and we must take our position as the world leader and broker
solutions, knowing the rest of the world is going to use this product
more than ever before. So finding a balance of the environment between
our concerns and our economic prosperity is going to happen. We should
be that leader also.
The solution for the United States is to develop a technology that
will allow us to use the fuels we need cleanly and to export that
technology to the world.
Yes, West Virginia and Rhode Island are indeed different in many
ways, but most importantly the Senator and I both know they are both
part of this great country, and that is what makes America great. We
can deliberate and challenge each other's positions on any one issue--
and we sure have had our share of dogged debates on the issues of
climate change and energy issues--but when it comes to deciding what is
best for our future generations and our beautiful Earth, there is
always room for reasonable compromise and a way forward.
So as we continue to work diligently in the Senate, I also look
forward to visiting again with him, and we will make that happen sooner
than later.
Once again, I thank Senator Whitehouse for coming to the table to
establish a truly commonsense, all-of-the-above energy policy that
acknowledges the vital role coal must play moving forward.
This energy strategy will also help protect good-paying jobs, boost
our economy nationwide and around the world, and improve the quality of
life of all living things.
We are going to fix this together, not as Democrats or Republicans
but as Americans, as the world leaders we always have been. We have
been looking to find the balance, and we will find the balance and show
not only America but the world that we can look past our differences to
better this world. I look forward so much to that. We both have looked
at it from this standpoint: We both agree we need to work together and
basically agree we have a responsibility in this world and this country
to be a leader again in finding a pathway to using the energy the good
Lord gave us and find the best balance we can with the economy and
environment, cleaning up the environment for which we are responsible.
I thank my good friend, and I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Brown). The senior Senator from Texas is
recognized.
____________________