[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 100 (Wednesday, June 25, 2014)]
[House]
[Pages H5765-H5766]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
IRS ``LOST DATA'' SCANDAL
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Collins of New York). Under the
Speaker's announced policy of January 3, 2013, the Chair recognizes the
gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Bentivolio) for 15 minutes.
Mr. BENTIVOLIO. Mr. Speaker, last week, we learned the IRS--the most
powerful and intimidating Federal agency in existence and the agency
now working to monitor our health care--has ``lost'' over 2 years of
emails from at least six employees.
In a master stroke of unluckiness, the IRS claims that the only
computer systems impacted are those belonging to top senior officials
connected to the targeting of Americans who held conservative political
beliefs--beliefs like the notion that the First Amendment should always
be protected in order to have a lasting, free democracy.
Nothing is ever this convenient.
Mr. Speaker, are we to believe the same entity that can turn the
lives of Americans upside down and that can demand 7 years of financial
and personal records just ``lost'' 2 years of data from its own
employees?
Mr. Speaker, what would happen to your constituents, to my
constituents or to any of our constituents--Democrats, Republicans or
Independents--if they were investigated by the IRS and ``lost'' 2 years
of data? Do you think the IRS would simply say, ``That's okay. I am
sure it was an accident. These things happen. We will drop our
investigation now''? Of course not. Yet that is what the IRS is telling
Congress. ``Oh, sorry. We lost our data. Oh, well. Let's move on.''
Mr. Speaker, how can we as Representatives tell our constituents to
cooperate with an entity that refuses to cooperate with Congress? How
can I tell my constituents to hand over personal information about
their lives to the IRS when the IRS won't do the same?
I will conclude with a simple question to my friends across the
aisle: Have you no shame? Your entire political outlook is based on the
idea that government can work in an unbiased and effective way. Yet,
when it becomes fairly clear that something isn't quite proper at the
most powerful agency in the United States, you simply obscure the
investigation instead of joining us in the call for a special
prosecutor.
When it becomes clear that ordinary citizens who are engaging in
their natural rights were targeted by a major officer at the IRS and
when that official tries to take the Fifth Amendment to put up
roadblocks to an investigation, you simply play politics. You are
worried about poll numbers rather than the Republic.
[[Page H5766]]
I recently asked the current IRS Commissioner whether or not he
believed that IRS workers could remain objective towards a group of
American citizens who believes that the IRS should be disbanded. He was
confounded by the question before answering that they were
professionals. I have no doubt that the people at the IRS are
professionals. The way they attacked conservative groups could only
have been done by professionals.
Let me open my question to all of my friends from across the aisle:
As members of the party of government, do you believe that any person
can sustain objectivity towards someone one perceives as a threat to
one's livelihood?
If you believe the answer is ``yes,'' then join me in calling for a
special prosecutor to help us find the truth. Prove your beliefs with
action. Defend your ideas that government can be involved in most
aspects of our lives by proving that nothing criminal happened at the
IRS. Show the American people that bureaucrats can remain objective in
the face of someone's telling them that their jobs shouldn't exist.
Mr. Speaker, our number one job here in Congress is to protect the
rights of the people, not to take them away. It is time for everyone in
this Chamber to remember that.
With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________