[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 94 (Tuesday, June 17, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3697-S3699]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NOMINATION OF PETER JOSEPH KADZIK TO BE AN ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the nomination.
The assistant bill clerk read the nomination of Peter Joseph Kadzik,
of New York, to be an Assistant Attorney General.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Washington.
Order of Procedure
Mrs. MURRAY. Madam President, following my remarks and those of
Senator Thune, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate recess until
2:15
[[Page S3698]]
p.m. to allow for the weekly caucus meetings and that the time during
the recess count postcloture on the Kadzik nomination, with the time
during the recess equally divided.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
Without objection, it is so ordered.
The Senator from Washington.
Family Friendly Policies
Mrs. MURRAY. Madam President, Senate Democrats have been focused on a
lot of ways to expand opportunity and economic security for women and
mothers in today's workforce. We have talked about the need to ensure
equal pay for equal work, to make childcare more affordable, and to
encourage profamily workplace policies that help workers be good
parents and good employees.
We have explained how each of those policies and others would give
working women and mothers a better shot at success. It is important to
keep in mind that times have changed in the last few decades. Today
two-thirds of families with children have two working parents. Dads are
taking a more hands-on role in raising their children. This means in
many working families fathers are increasingly facing a lot of the same
challenges that mothers do. In fact, more and more fathers report they
are struggling to balance work and family.
At a time when so many families need both parents to be at work in
order to make ends meet, we clearly need to update our policies so that
both mothers and fathers can succeed at work and at home. So today,
since it was just Father's Day, I asked a few dads to come in and speak
with my colleagues and me about how many of the policies often thought
of as especially important to working women, such as affordable
childcare, paid sick leave, would also do a lot for dads. I want to
thank them for taking the time to share their stories and their
experiences with all of us, because what we heard was really powerful.
We heard fathers speak about how family-friendly policies helped them
raise their kids and meet their responsibilities at work.
We heard from a dad who decided to stay home with his twins rather
than pay for childcare because it was simply too expensive. We heard
from a father and a small business owner who has made fair pay a
priority at his business because he knows how fast those lost wages add
up and how much equal pay can mean for a working family with a mortgage
or student loans or car payments or all three of those.
What these fathers made clear is the economic barriers we often see
as impacting women, such as inflexible workplace policies or the high
cost of childcare or unequal pay, are not just holding women back, they
are holding 21st century families back. There is no question in my mind
they are a drag on our economy. That is why Democrats are fighting for
policies that would help hard-working mothers and fathers across the
country.
We are fighting to make sure women get equal pay for equal work, just
as we made sure women do not get charged more for health insurance
because of their gender. We have legislation to expand access to
affordable quality childcare and early education so that mothers and
fathers can go to work knowing their children are safe and thriving
while they are away.
We have also proposed raising the minimum wage so parents are not
working full time but still stuck in poverty and struggling to make
ends meet. Democrats are also fighting to help our workers compete for
good jobs by bringing down tuition costs and ensuring workers can get
the training and education they need.
There is much more we can do as well. But any of those policies would
go an enormously long way toward helping working families get the fair
shot they deserve. This is why it has been so disappointing to see that
when it comes to everything from the Paycheck Fairness Act to the
raising of minimum wage for millions of our workers, to helping ease
the burden of student loans, our Republican colleagues have so far said
no, even though these policies are policies that would help millions of
our working families and even though we know Americans across the
country strongly support these kinds of changes. I know they would
certainly mean a lot to many of the fathers I spoke with today.
I came here today to say I hope our Republican colleagues rethink the
approach they have taken on all of those issues so far, because I
believe if we take steps to break down the barriers working mothers and
fathers are facing in today's economy, families across our country will
have more opportunity and our country will be stronger now and over the
long term.
There is no reason for us not to get to work on these.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from South Dakota.
South Dakota Flooding
Mr. THUNE. Madam President, before I begin my prepared remarks, I
wish to acknowledge my constituents in South Dakota who are dealing
with unprecedented flooding. We have seen historic amounts of rainfall
already in the month of June that dwarf anything we can compare to
throughout our State's history. Hail and winds are causing widespread
damage across the State.
It is not just confined to our State. There are States in the region
as well that are experiencing some of these same circumstances and
tremendous damage to property. So I wanted to express my thoughts and
prayers to the people I represent as well as to those in other States
who are dealing with some of these circumstances, and to say thank you
and express my appreciation to our first responders who have been very
much in demand and on call the last few days.
The Economy
The American people are very tired. They are very weary. They are
arguably fed up. The Washington Post headline from last Friday summed
it up, ``Obama's image hits record lows in trio of polls.'' Gallup,
CNN/ORC, and Bloomberg polls all found that the President's favorable
rating had fallen to new lows. It is no wonder. Five years after the
recession supposedly ended, most Americans still feel as though they
are in the midst of it.
It is not just me saying that. The President's own Federal Reserve
Chair Janet Yellen stated as recently as March, ``The recovery still
feels like a recession to many Americans, and it also looks that way in
some economic statistics.''
Let's talk about some of those statistics. Unemployment has spent the
past 5\1/2\ years at recession level highs. Currently nearly 10 million
Americans are unemployed, more than one-third of them for 6 months or
longer. The labor force participation rate is at a 36-year low. A USA
Today editorial from last week noted that the ``decline in the `labor
force participation rate' is one of the most troubling trends of our
time.'' Of course, the labor participation rate being the fraction of
the available workforce that is actually working or at least looking
for work.
What is driving that trend, Americans so discouraged by their failure
to find a job that they have literally given up looking altogether?
That is what is driving the trend in the labor participation rate.
Even after accounting for baby-boomers retiring and more people going
to college--and this is again from the USA Today piece I mentioned
earlier--this translates to 6 million people who could be working or
looking for work. As the paper points out, the lack of these workers in
the workforce means a weaker economy, lower tax revenue, as well as
greater governmental expense.
Young people just getting out of college face a bleak job market. The
unemployment rate for young adults is a staggering 13.2 percent or more
than twice the national average. The director of Outreach for
Generation Opportunity, a nonprofit advocacy organization for
millennials, recently stated that more than four out of five recent
graduates do not have jobs. Currently, 36 percent of young adults are
living at home with their parents.
It is no wonder that CNNmoney reports that young adults, aged 18 to
34, are most likely to feel the American dream is unattainable, with 63
percent saying it is not only unattainable, it is impossible.
Everywhere Americans look, prices are rising. The price of everything
from milk to the refrigerator to hold it has increased over the past
several years. Gas prices have almost doubled since President Obama
took office. College costs are soaring.
[[Page S3699]]
Then there is ObamaCare, which has meant soaring premiums and huge
deductibles for way too many American families. Being in the middle
class was once associated with financial security. With a little
prudence, middle-class families could be expected to see their kids
through college and to retire comfortably. No more.
In the Obama economy, the future is less secure. Household income not
only failed to rise over the past 5\1/2\ years, it has actually dropped
by $3,500 under the President's watch. Wages have remained flat and
economic growth has been tepid at best. Middle-class families are no
longer looking forward to a future of economic security. Instead, they
are praying they do not get hit with any unexpected bills. They are
worrying that they will not be able to send their kids to college, and
they are wondering how long they will have to work past retirement to
the economic security they need.
In a previous America, low-income families could confidently expect
that effort and hard work could bring them into the ranks of the middle
class. How many of our parents started out living on a shoestring but
ended up sending their kids to college and retiring comfortably?
Today, though, opportunities to reach the middle class are few and
far between. Fourteen million more Americans are on food stamps today
than when the President took office. Democratic policies such as the
ObamaCare 30-hour workweek are hitting low-income Americans the
hardest. Many of the better paying jobs lost during the recession are
not being replaced. Seventy-eight percent of the jobs lost during the
recession were high- or mid-wage jobs, but just 56 percent of the jobs
recovered have been high or mid-wage jobs. That means almost half of
the new jobs that have been created are low-wage jobs. That is not the
kind of climate that enables upward mobility.
The worst part is it does not look as though things are going to get
better anytime soon. This week the International Monetary Fund
announced it now predicts the United States economic growth rate will
not exceed 2 percent this year. That is not anywhere close to the kind
of growth we need for a real recovery.
The New York Times reported last week, ``The Federal Reserve,
persistently optimistic in its previous forecasts, said in March that
it no longer expected a full recovery in the foreseeable future.'' Let
me repeat that. The Federal Reserve said it no longer expected a full
recovery in the foreseeable future.
Four years ago President Obama and his administration proclaimed the
advent of the summer of economic recovery. President Obama claimed the
economy is headed in the right direction. Vice President Biden
confidently predicted in April of 2010 that sometime in the next couple
of months we are going to be creating between 250,000 jobs a month and
500,000 jobs a month. In August of that year, Treasury Secretary
Timothy Geithner published an op-ed in the New York Times entitled,
``Welcome to the Recovery.''
Well, as the American people know, recovery summer never
materialized. Four years later the American people are still waiting.
According to the Federal Reserve, they are going to have to wait
longer. In 2009, the President's economic advisors predicted that
unemployment would fall below 6 percent in 2012. Two years later,
unemployment is still firmly stuck above 6 percent. The Federal Reserve
Bank in San Francisco has suggested that 6-percent unemployment should
be considered the ``new normal.''
I do not accept that. Republicans do not accept that. We do not
accept 6.3 percent unemployment, sluggish economic growth, and
struggling middle-class families as the new normal, because it does not
have to be that way. We can get our economy going again. But it is
going to take something a lot different than the policies of the past
5\1/2\ years. It is going to take the kind of policies that remove
families' burdens, instead of increasing them. It is going to take
policies that encourage businesses to create jobs, not to cut jobs.
Republicans have a lot of ideas about how to get started, ideas such as
repealing the ObamaCare medical device tax that has already killed tens
of thousands of jobs and will kill thousands more if it is not stopped
or restoring the 40-hour workweek so businesses will no longer be
forced to cut employees' hours under ObamaCare's mandates or stopping
the President's national energy tax which would make it more difficult
for American families, particularly low-income families, to afford gas,
heating, and electricity or enacting trade promotion authority to open
new markets to American farmers, workers, and businesses, and to create
new good-paying jobs for American workers.
The list goes on. These are just a few of the ideas Republicans have
to get our economy going again.
If Democrats were serious about wanting to help American families,
they would be working with Republicans to help us get legislation
passed. We don't have to accept the President's economy as the new
normal: chronic high unemployment, sluggish growth, massive amounts of
debt. That shouldn't be the norm, and we shouldn't be satisfied with
it.
Republicans are going to be working every day to ensure it isn't the
new normal, and we will continue working until our economy is
flourishing again and every American has the opportunity for a good job
and a prosperous and secure future. We hope Democrats will work with us
toward that end. It means opening this floor of the Senate to
legislation that will grow our economy, create jobs, and allow us to
openly debate, allow us to offer amendments, something that hasn't
happened for the past year.
Since July of last year, there have been only nine Republican
amendments voted on on the floor of the Senate--nine--nine amendments
in almost a year. The ironic thing about that is the same procedures
that are being used to block Republican amendments are also blocking
Democratic amendments. So in that same timeframe Democrats have only
had seven amendments voted on in the past year.
In the world's greatest deliberative body, the place where we are
supposed to have open debate and an open amendment process, Republicans
had nine amendments voted on. We could take that as a personal affront,
but that is not what it is about. It is about the people whom we
represent because they elect us here to come out, represent them, and
to make sure their voices are heard in the political processes in the
debates we have in Washington on the big issues that are important to
them and their families. So when amendments are blocked and this
process is shut down on the floor of the Senate, it is the people's
voices who don't get heard and don't get represented. That has to
change, and it needs to change soon, because the issues are big, and
the problems and the challenges that face middle-income families are
consequential.
Many of us in this Chamber come here every single day hoping to offer
legislation and amendments that we believe will be solutions to getting
the economy growing again and to create jobs. Every single day for the
last year, at least, we have been shut down.
We can do better by the American people. They deserve better. I hope
we will do better, and we can start now.
I yield the floor.
____________________