[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 88 (Monday, June 9, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3489-S3490]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HEALTH CARE
Mr. COATS. Mr. President, last week, the Senate confirmed Sylvia
Burwell as our new Secretary of Health and Human Services. She is now
the administration's main implementer and representative of ObamaCare.
She is its new face and will be its primary salesperson to the American
people. I think the President made a competent choice, and I supported
her confirmation. But I would be remiss if I did not mention or bring
to light the difficult job she has ahead of her.
From its botched website to ever increasing premiums, to canceled
health insurance plans, ObamaCare has been and remains a complicated
mess of broken promises and confusing implementation. I was back home
in Indiana last weekend and the weekend before that, and ObamaCare,
along with complaints about overregulation, remain the top two issues
on people's minds. On Friday, I was in DeKalb County and Noble County
up in northeast Indiana meeting with representatives of those two
counties and communities and across the spectrum of people engaged in
various business enterprises--housewives, small businesses, big
businesses, elected officials, et cetera. In each of those discussions,
as I went across those two counties, as I said, overregulation and
ObamaCare were No. 1 and No. 2, or vice versa, on everyone's mind. It
continues to remain on their minds because they see this as a very
complicated and messy intrusion into their individual lives in terms of
their ability to run their businesses. For many, it is not a question
of ObamaCare not hurting them, but how it has hurt them and their
concerns about how it is going to hurt them in the future.
The President promised us that this plan--quote ``will lower the cost
of health care for our families, our businesses, and our government.''
Let me repeat that. The President said that ObamaCare would lower the
cost of health care--which it hasn't--for our families, our businesses,
and our government.
That is not what I have heard as I talk to people across the State of
Indiana. What I hear from Hoosiers is their premiums have increased,
they have higher health care costs, their deductibles have risen
dramatically, their copays have risen, and they have fewer provider
options. Remember what the President said: If like your doctor or your
health plan, you can keep it, period. That is not the case, and I hear
that from hundreds of Hoosiers as I travel around the State.
Let me speak about a specific story from a constituent, Jeremy, from
Randolph County, who said this:
My plan for my wife and two kids, ages 2 and 5, just
increased $150 to $615 per month. We cannot afford this
massive hike!
He went on to say: Something must be done to lower these plans
because we are seriously going to think about not being able to have
insurance for the first time since college because I simply can't
afford it. It is unaffordable.
The ACA, the so-called Affordable Care Act, has been called
unaffordable by so many Hoosiers--and I suspect that is true all around
the country--that it ought to be the unaffordable care act and not the
Affordable Care Act.
I don't know how many stories we have to bring to the floor of the
Senate before my colleagues understand and realize this plan is faulty
to the point that it needs to be replaced. It is deeply and fatally
flawed at its very core.
I know the majority leader came to the floor and said none of these
stories we have related are true. That is like telling Jeremy he
doesn't exist.
I don't think he made this up: My plan for my wife and kids has just
increased $150 a month to $615 a month. It is unaffordable. Americans
across the country are repeating these stories. They are not made up.
It is not something Republicans sits around and
[[Page S3490]]
write in the back room and sends out that says: Here, say this, so we
can repeat it on the floor of the House of Representatives or the
Senate floor. These are concerned citizens sending by the thousands
emails, phone calls, tweets, and any other means of communication. They
are speaking to us directly when we go back home, whether I am in the
grocery store buying a quart of milk, picking up a newspaper at the gas
station, just speaking to people on the street, or when I sit down with
business people. We have invited them to various small towns in
Indiana. As I said, these stories that are coming from real people I
represent--and they sent me here to represent them--is the impact of
the health care plan that has been proposed by the President and now is
being implemented. So all of the promises that were made early on--but
it wasn't in force--have now been proven to be untrue.
Don't just take my word for it. Look at the headlines. Reuters, which
I don't think is an arm of the Republican Senatorial Committee or the
Republican National Committee, and is an independent newspaper says:
``U.S. says 2.2 million ObamaCare enrollees have data problems.''
CNBC--the last time I heard they weren't making contributions to the
Republican Party either: ``Seven in 10 people say ObamaCare had bad or
zero impact on U.S.'' Either nothing--no impact or bad impact--that is
70 percent.
Indianapolis Business Journal, to which I pay attention, and an
independent organization: ``Indiana's ObamaCare rates for 2015 all over
the map.''
People can't figure out how much they are going to have to pay next
year, but they have figured out one thing. It is going to be more than
they paid last year.
Remember the statement ``premiums won't go up?'' It won't go up a
penny?
I think many of us think it is time to start over and replace
ObamaCare with real health care solutions. Republicans have offered a
multitude of possibilities of suggestions and proposals, every one of
which has been turned down by the President or not allowed to be
brought to the floor by the Senate majority leader.
There are those who say: What would you do? Why don't you suggest
something? We have tried our very best to bring forward packages of
reforms, to reach across the aisle and say, if you will work with us,
we will try to fix some of these problems. We think we should repeal it
and start over because we don't think it is the right model for health
care, to address the solution of providing people in this country with
adequate health care at a reasonable cost.
So changing the face of ObamaCare by just putting in a new Secretary
of Health and Human Services will not change this law's negative impact
on Hoosiers such as Jeremy. I wish it would, but, obviously, it won't.
It will not change this disaster of a law into what it should be:
Better health care for all Americans. We are all committed to that
goal, but we are simply saddled with a piece of legislation that was
very poorly drafted, that was rushed through without any support or
comments from those of us on the other side of the aisle.
I wasn't here at the time. One of the reasons I ran and came back was
to try to address what I thought was legislation taking us down a road
to a dysfunctional health care system, with less quality, less access,
less choice, less competition.
Is there a need to reform this current health care system? Yes. Are
there solutions that are better than what has been put before us? Yes.
I wish we could summon the support and the will of those in this body
to begin addressing that very problem.
Mr. President, I see other colleagues on the floor, and I yield the
floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Texas.
____________________