Congressional Record, Volume 160 Issue 76 (Tuesday, May 20, 2014)

[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 20, 2014)]
[House]
[Pages H4541-H4680]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

HOWARD P. ``BUCK'' McKEON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2015

General Leave

Mr. McKEON. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and
insert extraneous material on H.R. 4435.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Forbes). Is there objection to the
request of the gentleman from California?
There was no objection.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 585 and rule
XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House
on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill, H.R. 4435.
The Chair appoints the gentleman from Utah (Mr. Stewart) to preside
over the Committee of the Whole.

{time} 1924

In the Committee of the Whole

Accordingly, the House resolved itself into the Committee of the
Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill
(H.R. 4435) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for
military activities of the Department of Defense and for military
construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal
year, and for other purposes, with Mr. Stewart in the chair.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The CHAIR. Pursuant to the rule, the bill is considered read the
first time.
The gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon) and the gentleman from
Washington (Mr. Smith) each will control 30 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of H.R. 4435, the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
First, let me express my appreciation to Ranking Member Smith for his
leadership and friendship. He has been an invaluable partner in
upholding our committee's focus on providing for our men and women in
uniform. I would also like to thank our colleagues on the Armed
Services Committee for

[[Page H4542]]

their professionalism and their hard work.
I am incredibly proud of the bipartisan, transparent, and inclusive
process our committee undertakes each year. The bill under
consideration today is a strong reflection of the bipartisan priorities
and concerns shared by members of the committee, and is the result of
diligent oversight that has been conducted throughout the year. It
contains 154 amendments that were adopted during markup, and it passed
out of committee with unanimous support.
The bill would authorize $521 billion for national defense and an
additional $79 billion for overseas contingency operations, consistent
with the 2013 bipartisan budget agreement and the House-passed budget.
While we do not yet have the details of the OCO request, our
committee, the House Budget Committee, and the administration, all
agree that these funds will be required to support a residual U.S.
presence in Afghanistan; other ongoing operations, including in Africa;
and the reset and retrograde of equipment for the active, Guard, and
Reserve forces.
The bill contains no earmarks. It provides vital national security
resources for our troops while also maintaining our stewardship over
the taxpayer dollar.
The bill provides our warfighters, veterans, and their families with
the care and support that they need, deserve, and have earned. It
continues to advance the substantial reforms introduced in last year's
NDAA aimed at preventing sexual assault in the military, and it takes
several steps aimed at improving the military's suicide prevention
programs. The bill would increase troop pay while rejecting cuts to
TRICARE, housing allowances, and commissary benefits that would
increase out-of-pocket expenses for military families.
The legislation would provide our warfighters with the resources and
authorities they need to support an enduring mission in Afghanistan and
to continue pressuring al Qaeda and its affiliates. It also maintains
strong accountability and monitoring mechanisms for U.S. funds, ensures
the development of sound plans tied to resources, and continues the
prohibitions on the transfer of detainees to the United States.
I recently visited Afghanistan and was encouraged by the progress of
coalition forces and developments within the Afghan society. Nearly 8
million kids are in school, and a large percentage of those are girls,
compared to the 700,000 that were attending school under Taliban rule.
We need the President to signal his commitment and remove the
uncertainty that persists among the Afghan people and our coalition
partners, which al Qaeda and the Taliban continue to exploit.
Afghanistan cannot return to being a safe haven for al Qaeda.
In this era of declining resources, the committee was faced with
difficult choices as we sought to preserve key capabilities and to
ensure our Armed Forces could meet current threats and prepare for
future challenges. The bill identifies savings in less critical areas
that do not permanently damage the force or harm recruiting and
retention.
The legislation guards against achieving false short-term savings at
the expense of vital long-term strategic capabilities.

{time} 1930

For example, it supports the refueling of the USS George Washington--
an aircraft carrier with 25 years of service life remaining--and it
prohibits the early retirement of Navy cruisers, dock landing ships,
and the Air Force U-2 spy planes.
These capabilities are vital to our commanders in the Pacific, as
well as elsewhere across the globe. It also addresses shortfalls in
readiness by resourcing several unmet requirements in equipment,
training, and depot maintenance and by fully funding flying hour
programs across the services.
We must also get more defense for the dollar, which is why the
committee has initiated a comprehensive defense reform effort. This
bill begins that process with a series of provisions on institutional,
acquisition, security, and strategy reforms.
However, we must recognize that cost savings and reforms alone do not
compensate for the significant cuts to defense in recent years. The
Department of Defense has seen over $1 trillion cut from its budget.
This year's budget request is over $30 billion less than last year's.
The padding has been cut, and the Department is now cutting into the
bone--cutting end strength, force structure, and readiness--which is
increasing risk to our forces and their core missions. While this bill
makes tough choices, Congress will be called upon to make impossible
choices in the years ahead if sequestration is not addressed.
For 52 straight years, the National Defense Authorization Act has
been passed and signed into law. Congress has no higher responsibility
than to provide for the common defense, and with that in mind, I look
forward to passing this bill for the 53rd consecutive year, my last
year as chairman and as a Member of Congress.
Serving as chairman has been the great honor of my career. I am
humbled by the many soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines whom I have
met over the years and by the sacrifices that they and their families
make to keep America safe. I am thankful for my colleagues on both
sides of the aisle, and I am very appreciative of our staff.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I
may consume.
First of all, I want to join the chairman in thanking him for the
working relationship that he and I have enjoyed now through 4 years and
four national defense authorization acts. It is one of the main
principles of our committee in that it is bipartisan, that we work
together, and we produce a product every year--52 straight years, the
National Defense Authorization Act.
That doesn't happen as a starting point, unless the chair of the
committee takes the responsibility very seriously to make sure that our
committee remains bipartisan. We have had a whole series of chairmen
during my tenure who have done that, and Mr. McKeon has followed that
tradition just as well as his predecessors. He has worked very closely
with us.
We do not always agree, but we work closely together, understanding
that, at the end of the day, we have to produce a bill. So I thank him
for that, and I recognize that this will be his last NDAA. In fact,
this is the Buck McKeon National Defense Authorization Act. Mr.
Thornberry and I were proud to cosponsor the amendment in committee to
name this after Buck, for his great service to our committee.
As always, I also want to thank the staff. I can't thank them enough
for the work that they do and for the hours that they put in. They
spent yesterday going through 320 amendments.
Their expertise that they bring to this process is invaluable, and
someday, I hope that the House Administration Committee recognizes that
and actually gives us the amount of money we need to keep them. That is
just a little sidenote on a different piece of legislation.
This is, by and large, a good bill with one significant problem,
which I will get to in a minute.
First of all, as the chairman notes, we are still at war in
Afghanistan. I would say that I think, at this point, our continuing
commitment to Afghanistan is up to the Afghan people and, most
importantly, is up to the next Afghan President. We need the bilateral
security agreement to be signed. It has been agreed to.
President Karzai has refused to sign it, but hopefully, the next
President will. We have troops in harm's way, and this bill prioritizes
protecting them. Nothing is more important than what we do here today.
I am also pleased that this bill prioritizes Special Operations
Command and cyber warfare, recognizing, as we heard in the previous
piece of legislation about Boko Haram, that the main threat that we
face going forward is from terrorism and asymmetric threats.
I think we reflect that in this bill by funding those portions in the
Defense Department that deal with those issues, and I think that is
incredibly important.
However, we do have a budget problem, and put simply, we have a lot
less money now than we thought we were

[[Page H4543]]

going to have. So that means that 3 years ago, when the Pentagon was
planning what they were going to spend over the course of a decade,
they had a much larger number than they have now.
There are a whole bunch of reasons that number has gotten smaller,
but it has. It will get even smaller if 8 more years of sequestration
come to pass.
Now, the administration put out a plan 3 years ago when they looked
out 10 years and said: What should our strategy be? Then they looked
out 10 years and said: What are the likely resources?
When they put that plan out, they said: we know we are going to have
to live with, roughly, $500 billion less than we thought we were. We
can do it. Here is the strategy. Here is the plan that fits that.
Since then, the budget has been shredded. It has been cut by even
more. The plan they put forward now recognizes the fact that it doesn't
fund what they would like to fund because Congress passed a budget that
cuts the Defense Department by more than they would like. In fact, the
administration asked for an additional $28 billion this year and an
additional $150 billion over 5 years, in order to fully fund that.
That, apparently, is not forthcoming, so what they did is they put
forward a series of proposals to try as best as they could to save
money in a way that protects our force, and they did it in a number of
different areas.
They proposed a BRAC; they proposed about $2 billion in savings over
5 years to various personnel accounts; they got rid of the A-10; they
got rid of the U-2; they proposed laying up 14 ships. Those were the
main proposals out.
I am sorry. I forgot that they proposed shifting air assets in the
Guard and Reserve to save $12 billion over 5 years. Those were the
proposals they put on the table.
The problem with this bill is that it rejects every single one of
those proposals. How do we make the money work on that? Primarily by
creative accounting; with the Guard and Reserve, for instance, we say
no changes can be made in 2015.
They weren't planning on making any changes in 2015 that were going
to cost money, but if this stops them from doing it going forward, they
are put into a deep hole.
On the 14 ships that they wanted to lay up, we raid the modernization
account to pay for keeping those 14 ships operational. So we get
creative about it, but next year, the reckoning will come, frankly,
sequestration or no sequestration. If sequestration happens, it is
going to be really bad; but even if it doesn't, we still will not have
addressed the long-term needs of our budget.
I will have a couple of amendments, one on BRAC and one on those 14
ships, that will give us an opportunity to, I think, make a better
choice because the other way that we are able to preserve those
programs is that we cut from the President's budget about $1.8 billion
in readiness.
$1.2 billion is clear. The other 633 was to save the A-10, and it
comes out of OCO. A good chunk of OCO goes to rebuild readiness; so
basically, we take $1.8 billion out of readiness, which puts us down
the path to a hollow force that none of us wants. As we go forward to
conference, we are going to need to make some of those tougher choices.
I do thank the chairman for his work and for what is contained in
this bill. I look forward to debating the amendments, and I look
forward to--knock on wood--passing for the 53rd straight year the
National Defense Authorization Act, as is our primary responsibility.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. Thornberry), my friend and colleague, who is the vice
chairman of the Armed Services Committee and who is the chairman of the
Intelligence, Emerging Threats, and Capabilities Subcommittee.
Mr. THORNBERRY. I thank the chairman for yielding.
Mr. Chairman, I want to start by commending the leadership of
Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith in getting this bill to the
floor in such a timely way, especially after the President's budget was
quite late, but also in getting this bill here on a unanimous vote by
the committee.
None of us agrees with every provision that is in this bill, but
members of the committee were able to put aside personal preferences on
individual issues to support a bill that benefits the Nation overall,
and I hope that the House will do likewise.
I think it is important to emphasize that it has been a bipartisan
effort, working together with the chairman and the ranking member and
also with the chairmen of the subcommittees and with the ranking
members of the subcommittees, that has gotten us to this place.
I think it is especially appropriate for this bill to be named for
Chairman McKeon, not only in recognition for his leadership on this
bill, but for his leadership of the committee during some very
challenging circumstances throughout his tenure.
Some of those challenges have included our own budget issues, as was
just addressed by the ranking member, as well as a myriad of threats
around the world, so this measure that does so much for our country's
security will always be associated with the many contributions of
Chairman McKeon to our country's security.
Mr. Chairman, this bill meets the budget targets of the House-passed
budget resolution and also of the Ryan-Murray budget agreement. I agree
with the ranking member in that it does not solve our budget issues in
the future--we still have to grapple with those--but this year, it
meets those requirements, and it does so by making some difficult
choices.
In addition, among the many provisions of this bill, there are those
that start to make a modest start on some defense reforms that are
being worked on by both the House and the Senate in coordination with
the Pentagon and with private industry.

I think everyone recognizes that we have to find a way to get more
defense out of the money we spend, and there are some small but
important steps to enable us to make greater progress in that area in
the future, both by reducing overhead and by improving the way we
acquire goods and services.
This bill is also active in all areas of responsibility for the
Subcommittee on Intelligence, Emerging Threats, and Capabilities,
including military cyber, science and technology, information
technology, defense intelligence, special operations, and
counterterrorism and irregular warfare.
I agree with the ranking member on the importance, especially, of
cyber and special operations. In addition, we have coordinated with
other subcommittees on a number of provisions that touch on the areas I
have mentioned. In fact, I think the work among the subcommittees has
been closer than I have ever seen it.
In that regard, I want to express my appreciation for my partner on
the IETC Subcommittee, the gentleman from Rhode Island (Mr. Langevin),
for all of his insights and cooperative spirit that make our work
together so beneficial and rewarding. Like the chairman, I appreciate
all of the work of the staffs of the subcommittee and the full
committee.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Rhode Island (Mr. Langevin), the ranking member of the
Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee.
(Mr. LANGEVIN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his
remarks.)
Mr. LANGEVIN. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of H.R. 4435, the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
I would like to begin by thanking Chairman McKeon for his leadership
of the committee and for all of his years of dedication to national
security. It is appropriate that this act is named after him.
I want to thank and recognize the ranking member, Adam Smith, for his
leadership on the committee as well. He deeply cares about national
security, and I appreciate the work that he has done on this mark.
I also want to thank Congressman Mac Thornberry, the chair of the
Intelligence, Emerging Threats, and Capabilities Subcommittee. It has
been a privilege working with him. As the ranking member of the IETC
Subcommittee, I do appreciate his bipartisan work, and I am pleased
with the bill that we have produced this year.

[[Page H4544]]

Mr. Chairman, the IETC portion of the bill authorizes approximately
$7.6 billion for the U.S. Special Operations Command. Authorities
necessary for Special Operations Forces to combat terrorism are
extended in the bill, which also provides an additional $20 million for
the Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office, which gives our
Special Operations Forces the cutting-edge capabilities and
technologies that they need.
The IETC Subcommittee also made investments in emerging technologies
like electrical weapons, and I want to commend especially the Navy's
efforts to move technologies like directed energy and railguns, in
particular, out of the labs and into the field.
Getting this game-changing technology into the hands of the Nation's
sailors and into the hands of all of our warfighters will ultimately
serve to realize the promise of research investment.
In addition to our focus on research and development efforts, we must
also put investments into education programs, so that there is a
qualified science, technology, engineering, and mathematics--or STEM--
talent pool to benefit the DOD.
I am particularly pleased that the bill provides a total of $55.5
million for the National Defense Education Program. Additionally, the
IETC portion of the bill includes provisions to strengthen the
oversight of the intelligence community while ensuring that combat and
commander intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements
are met.
The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Rice of South Carolina). The time of the
gentleman has expired.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield the gentleman an additional 1
minute.
Mr. LANGEVIN. I thank the ranking member.
Mr. Chairman, last but certainly not least, the bill also supports
cyber operations and U.S. Cyber Command, while reducing redundant
programs and increasing transparency and oversight.

{time} 1945

As recent revelations of cyber incidents demonstrate, a trained and
ready cyber force and robust defensive capabilities have never been
more integral to our national security.
These are just but a few of the highlights in the bill. In the
interest of time, I will end there. But I do want to again thank the
chairman and the ranking member for their leadership, all the members
of the Armed Services Committee, as well as the staff of the committee,
for all the work that they have put into this mark.
I urge my colleagues to support the bill.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from
Virginia (Mr. Forbes), my friend and colleague and a member of the
Armed Services Committee and chairman of the Seapower and Projection
Forces Subcommittee.
Mr. FORBES. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. With the
chairman's leadership and stewardship, I believe that this bill
provides the right authorities within the budget limits provided.
I continue to be impressed by Chairman McKeon's commitment to our
national defense and particularly his leadership and zeal to complete
the 54th annual National Defense Authorization Act. His inspirational
determination and effort to provide for our national security will
undoubtedly serve as a benchmark for our future.
I also want to recognize my friend and ranking member of the Seapower
and Projection Forces Subcommittee on the occasion of his retirement
from the House of Representatives. Mike McIntyre has been a resolute
supporter of the men and women in uniform. His departure after
providing 18 years of support for our national defense and this
institution will be sorely missed.
As to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, I
continue to be concerned about the trajectory of our national defense
and believe that our national security will be irreparably harmed if we
continue on our current path. History is full of examples of nation-
states that underestimate the value of national security and the severe
consequences of their failure. Our inability to change these trend
lines will be measured in the sweat and blood of the men and women whom
we collectively hold in such high esteem.
While we support these men and women in words, I fear that the real
damage to our servicemembers is being caused by the benign neglect of
this administration and, at times, Congress, in terms of funding and
effort. We must not stand idly by watching the continued dismantling of
the world's finest military.
As to the Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee mark, I am
pleased that we were successful in reversing the administration
recommendation to eliminate an aircraft carrier. By restoring $796
million for the long lead item procurement and detailed planning for
the refueling and complex overhaul of the USS George Washington, we are
taking the right steps to retain strategic options for future
Presidents.
I am also pleased that we funded two Arleigh Burke class destroyers,
two Virginia class submarines, and two littoral combat ships. I want to
especially highlight our incremental funding of the San Antonio class
amphibious ship. This amphib will bring important support to our United
States Marine Corps as we continue our strategic rebalance toward the
Pacific.
I remain very pleased with the direction of our projection forces.
This bill provides strategic Air Force investments in terms of
procuring 13 C-130J military transport variants, six KC-46A tankers,
and significant research and development investments in the long-range
strike bomber.
While we have a long way to go to reverse some negative trends, I
think this bill does a good job of supporting our forces within the
budget constraints provided. However, we need to vigorously and
resolutely seek another path to change our national security funding
trajectory.
I think this bill is another positive step on a long road to
adequately support our national security, and I would urge my
colleagues to support the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentlelady from California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez), ranking member of the
Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee.
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chair, I thank the ranking
member and my colleague from California, Chairman McKeon, in
particular, for all the work and guidance that he has given us as he
leaves the Congress at the end of this year. I am sure we will fete you
in better ways, but thank you for the work you have done.
I want to thank the chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces
Subcommittee, Chairman Mike Turner, for his leadership this year.
We have worked in a bipartisan manner. We have had three critical
goals in mind as we have done this: supporting our troops with the
equipment that they need, cutting wasteful spending, and investing in
our future.
The subcommittee's portion of H.R. 4435 supports all of the high-
priority acquisition programs in the President's budget.
H.R. 4435 provides $8.3 billion for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter,
$3.8 billion for Army aviation upgrades, $1.4 billion for the Ospreys,
and $997 million for U.S. Marine Corps ground equipment.
However, our subcommittee didn't just rubberstamp everything. We
actually took a very careful look at what programs were working, which
ones were slow, and what wasn't getting done. We were able to identify
more than $600 million in funding that we put in other places in the
bill. They were used to increase funding in numerous areas in an effort
to provide additional equipment for our military and preserve critical
production capabilities for the future.
Specifically, the bill provides an additional $450 million for the
EA-18G Growler aircraft for the Navy, $340 million for additional
ground combat vehicles for the Army, $80 million in additional funds
for the procurement of body armor, $250 million in funding for the
National Guard and Reserve equipment account, and numerous other
investments.

[[Page H4545]]

Finally, the chairman's mark includes important oversight legislation
on numerous major DOD programs to ensure that the Congress has the
information it needs to make future judgments.
The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield the gentlelady an additional 1
minute.
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. This is a good government bill.
Please vote for it.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from
South Carolina (Mr. Wilson), my friend and colleague and a member of
the Armed Services Committee and chairman of the Military Personnel
Subcommittee.
Mr. WILSON of South Carolina. Thank you, Chairman McKeon, for your
leadership. Congratulations on the deserved naming in your honor of the
National Defense Authorization Act.
Mr. Chair, the military personnel provisions of H.R. 4435 are a
product of an open, bipartisan process. H.R. 4435 provides our
warfighters, veterans, and military families the care and support they
need, deserve, and have earned.
Specifically, this year's proposal continues to refine the Department
of Defense sexual assault and response program while at the same time
actively monitoring the Department's implementation of the significant
reforms enacted by Congress over the past 2 years.
In particular, the mark requires performance evaluations for
commanding officers to include assessments of the command climate
pertaining to sexual assault.
In addition, the mark would require the Secretary of Defense to
conduct a review, utilizing the services of an independent organization
experienced in grocery retail analysis, of the defense commissary
system and reverse some of the reductions to the commissary system.
The mark would express the sense of Congress that the United States
has a responsibility to continue to search for missing or captured
members of the Armed Forces, leaving no one behind.
Additionally, this would standardize the collection reporting and
assessments of suicide data involving members of the Armed Forces and
their family members.
Although the mark follows the administration's request for annual end
strength reductions, I have serious reservations about the end strength
and force structure reduction of our military. America remains at war
today, and will continue a global conflict with murderous illegal enemy
combatants.
We must not forget the attacks of September 11, 2001, and September
11, 2012, in the global war on terrorism.
This report does not include the administration's request for
military retirees to pay more for health care. Congress established the
Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission, and we
need to be informed of their analysis before proceeding with changes
impacting military families.
In conclusion, I want to thank Ranking Member Susan Davis and her
staff for their input in this process. We were joined by an active,
informed, and dedicated group of subcommittee members supported by a
professional staff in the tradition of the late John Chapla.
I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. McIntyre), the ranking member on the
Seapower and Projection Forces Subcommittee.
Mr. McINTYRE. Mr. Chairman, the Seapower and Projection Forces
portion of this bill continues this subcommittee's tradition of strong
bipartisan support for our men and women in uniform. I would like to
thank Subcommittee Chairman Forbes for working together in such an open
and bipartisan manner.
This is a good bill. This is an extremely challenging time, we know,
for the Department of Defense, given the fiscal constraints that it is
being required to operate under.
With this bill, the Armed Services Committee has attempted to strike
the difficult balance of providing for the current force while also
looking forward to the requirements of the future force.

I am pleased in particular this bill includes provisions that restore
funding for the refueling and complex overhaul of the USS George
Washington, which is the first step needed to ensure we maintain the
requirement of 11 aircraft carriers. This bill also authorizes two
Virginia class submarines, two Arleigh Burke destroyers, and an
additional 96 Tomahawk missiles.
This bill creates a national sea-based deterrence fund that is
designed to provide the Navy with some flexibility when it begins
construction of the Ohio class replacement submarine.
With this being my last defense bill before retiring at the end of
this term, I want to thank my good friend Randy Forbes for his
leadership as chairman of the subcommittee and his friendship through
the years.
I also want to thank my friend and my classmate, Adam Smith, for his
great leadership, and our gracious chairman, Buck McKeon, for the
leadership that he has given our committee overall and for his
friendship as well. I wish him well on his retirement.
I am glad that all of these gentleman that I have named and those
that I have served with on the subcommittee and the full committee have
together shared that position for making sure we do right by our men
and women in uniform.
With that, Mr. Speaker, I support the passage of this defense bill. I
urge other Members here in the Congress to do the same.
I pray God's blessings be upon all of those who serve and will
benefit from this bill.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from
Ohio (Mr. Turner), my friend and colleague and a member of the Armed
Services Committee and chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces
Subcommittee.
Mr. TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of H.R. 4435, the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
I want to begin by thanking Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith
for their leadership in this committee and this being truly a
bipartisan effort.
This will be Chairman McKeon's last bill. He has not only been a
leader for our committee and in Congress, but he has been a tremendous
mentor for so many of us in Congress. His legacy will leave a lasting
impact not only in legislation affecting the Department of Defense, our
national security, and our men and women in uniform, but the Members of
Congress who serve. And certainly, as we look to the future of the
Armed Services Committee, his legacy will be in his mentoring of the
other members of the committee.
I serve as chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee
as well as the cochair of the Military Sexual Assault Prevention
Caucus. I first want to thank the subcommittee's ranking member,
Loretta Sanchez from California, for her support in completing the
markup of this bill.
The committee's focus has been to support the men and women of the
Armed Forces and their families, providing them the equipment they need
and the support that they so deserve. This bill helps to retain defense
technology superiority, sustains the defense industrial base, and
maintains effective modernization for our military.
The committee bill includes additional funding for Abrams Tanks,
Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Stryker Combat Vehicles, Tactical Wheeled
Vehicles, body armor, and unmanned aerial systems.
I believe the committee bill strikes the appropriate balance between
equipping our military to effectively carry out its mission while also
providing aggressive oversight to ensure appropriate use of taxpayers'
dollars.
The bill again this year takes a significant step in combating the
issue of sexual assault in the military by incorporating the FAIR
Military Act of 2014, a bipartisan bill first introduced by myself and
Representative Niki Tsongas.
I would like to thank Representative Tsongas, Military Personnel
Subcommittee Chairman Joe Wilson, and Representative Davis, ranking
member on the Personnel Subcommittee, for their leadership on this
issue. I want to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for
their leadership that has allowed a bipartisan solution on sexual
assault.

[[Page H4546]]

Under this bill, Congress limits the use of the ``good soldier
defense,'' which allows a defendant to cite unrelated, subjective
factors during trial, such as military record. It requires commanders
be assessed on their ability to create a climate where a victim can
report a crime without fear of retaliation. It ensures that the changes
and provisions regarding military sexual assault prevention from the
FY14 defense authorization apply to the military service academies.

{time} 2000

Finally, this bill provides the child custody protections that our
military men and women deserve.
I, again, want to thank Chairman McKeon for his help on protecting
the custody rights of our men and women in uniform. No longer will our
men and women face deployment while having to worry whether or not they
have the custody of their children upon return.
I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this bill
and to vote ``yes'' on H.R. 4435.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Davis), ranking member of the
Military Personnel Subcommittee.
Mrs. DAVIS of California. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank Mr. Wilson
and the committee staff for working in a bipartisan manner to develop
this bill.
The Buck McKeon NDAA continues the committee's focus on sexual
assault and includes such provisions as requiring the judicial panel to
assess the use of mental health records by the defense in preliminary
hearings and to compare this with the civilian use of mental health
records in criminal proceedings; clarifying that the service academies,
including the Coast Guard Academy, are subject to the same sexual
harassment and assault requirements; requiring an inspector general
review of the separation records of servicemembers who made
unrestricted reports and determining whether such separation was in
retaliation for filing said report; requiring performance appraisals of
a commanding officer to include whether a command climate has been
established in which allegations of sexual assault are properly managed
and victims feel free to report; and requiring the Secretary of Defense
to modify rule 404 of the Military Rules of Evidence to clarify that
general military character of an accused is not admissible, except in
cases where the military character of the accused is relevant to the
offense being charged.
Mr. Chairman, oversight of sexual assault in the military remains a
priority of the committee, and we will continue to identify gaps that
need to be addressed and to enable the Department of Defense to reduce
these numbers.
We all want to get to the same place--safe working conditions and a
harassment-free, sexual assault-free environment for all, and there are
different views of how to get there; but the bill, as it is now, gives
us the opportunity to create a military where change can and must
occur.
On other personnel matters, our bill does not include the proposed
legislative changes to the commissary system, housing allowances, and
the health care modifications requested by the Department of Defense.
As a result of that, the Department will need to address the $1.5
billion savings it already took in its fiscal year 2015 budget.
The Acting CHAIR. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. I yield the gentlewoman an additional 30
seconds.
Mrs. DAVIS of California. In addition, the restoration of the 1
percent COLA reduction that was in the budget agreement and restored
earlier this year left the Department with an additional hole of $500
million for fiscal year 2015, and these savings will need to be paid
for from other Department of Defense accounts.
We must begin that discussion, and I hope that the Military
Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission will be the start
of that.
We know these are difficult times, and difficult decisions need to be
made to protect and sustain our All-Volunteer Force. It has already
been stated that ignoring these issues will only lead the Department to
take significant cuts to our end strength and readiness.
Despite these concerns though, Mr. Chairman, this bill deserves
passage.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from
Alabama (Mr. Rogers), my friend and colleague, a member of the Armed
Services Committee and the chairman of the Strategic Forces
Subcommittee.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I rise today in support of the
Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015.
This is an important annual bill, not just because, as you have
heard, it is the 53rd in a row; it is what is in the bill for our men
and women in uniform and our national security that counts.
For example, we fully support the Israeli Cooperative programs,
including Iron Dome, while also continuing to make progress on U.S.-
based coproduction to strengthen our ally, Israel.
We include increased resources for our GMD system, which is our only
homeland missile defense capability.
We support critical nuclear weapons capabilities, including programs
the President promised to support as a part of the deal to ratify the
New START treaty, which are $2 billion short of what was promised with
several key programs years behind schedule.
We have initiated in this bill the development of a competitively
sourced next-generation rocket engine. We will not permit the
kleptocrats in charge of Russia to hold our national security space
programs hostage. It is past time that we reinvigorate our rocket motor
industrial base.
I am pleased that we also are able to begin a pilot program for a new
and more commonsense public-private partnership acquisition approach
for the procurement of commercial satellite communication services.
We also begin the same public-private partnership process to deal
with the scores of obsolete, decrepit, nonnuclear facilities in the
NNSA.
Mr. Chairman, in taking a look at the amendments that were filed with
the Rules Committee, it is clear to me that plenty of our colleagues
are not happy with the tough choices made by the 2-year budget deal
reached last year, and I join them.
As we debate these amendments over the next couple of days, I think
Members will see what those of us on the Armed Services Committee have
been warning for about a year. There are no more easy choices. We are
not just cutting into the muscle and bone; we are amputating vital
limbs.
I have a warning for every Member of this body. If you think the
choices that we made were tough this year, wait till next year, when
sequestration returns.
I wish to thank the ranking member, the gentleman, and my friend from
Tennessee, for his outstanding leadership on this subcommittee.
I wish to thank Chairman McKeon for all he has done over his long
career for the men and women of our armed services. They may never know
all he has done for them, but I know. If he had to do it here again, he
would.
Mr. Chairman, I thank you for your service, and I look forward to
working with you to see that the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National
Defense Authorization Act is signed into law later this year.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I now yield 2 minutes to the
gentlewoman from Massachusetts (Ms. Tsongas), the ranking member of the
Oversight and Investigation Subcommittee.
Ms. TSONGAS. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of H.R. 4435. I want to
begin by thanking Chairman McKeon for his decades of service in the
House and for his evenhanded tenure leading the Armed Services
Committee.

I also want to thank Ranking Member Smith for his leadership and his
willingness to address the tough issues that face the United States
military.
This year's NDAA takes further necessary steps toward eliminating
sexual assault in our military ranks. I appreciate the efforts of
Congressman Wilson and Congresswoman Davis to ensure the inclusion of
the FAIR Military Act into this bill.
I would also like to thank my cochair of the Military Sexual Assault
Prevention Caucus and coauthor of the FAIR Military Act, Congressman
Mike Turner.
The fiscal year '15 NDAA ensures servicemembers at all levels are
held

[[Page H4547]]

to the highest standard, and no more will the so-called ``good soldier
defense'' allow criminal behavior to go unpunished and prevent justice
from prevailing.
This NDAA also makes strides toward addressing the epidemic of
suicide surrounding our military. It requires the Department of Defense
to establish a system to track all suicides and attempted suicides for
Active Duty, Reserves, and Guard servicemembers, as well as military
family members, so that we can better understand the full scope of this
tragedy.
I would also like to highlight the important work that his bill does
with regard to research and development. In this era of increasingly
capable enemies and constrained budgets, the DOD must rapidly take
advantage of technological advancements and deliver these capabilities
to the field.
Key provisions in the NDAA will enhance the DOD's ability to recruit
and retain the Nation's best talent, talent needed to develop the
resources that are key to keeping servicemembers safe and successful
around the globe.
Similarly, I was encouraged that this bill incorporates language
creating opportunities for investment in critical R&D programs like the
Combat Feeding program at Natick Soldier Systems. This center finds
ways to make sure our servicemembers are fed and fed well in some of
the world's most unforgiving climates.
Finally, I would like to thank the committee staff who worked closely
with all of our staffs to include these important provisions in the
bill.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from
Virginia (Mr. Wittman), my friend and colleague, a member of the Armed
Services Committee and the chairman of the Readiness Subcommittee.
Mr. WITTMAN. Mr. Chairman, and Ranking Member Smith, thank you so
much for your leadership in leading this bill to the floor.
I rise in support of the Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense
Authorization Act, which provides funding for ongoing operations in
Afghanistan and, most critically, for our men and women on the front
lines, where they continue to fight and die on our behalf each and
every day.
No one in this Chamber should forget that most of the decisions we
make impact them first and foremost. It is our constitutional
responsibility and should be our highest priority to ensure that they
have the training and equipment they need to do their missions and come
home safely. We must be committed to ensuring that our force is always
ready to respond if a crisis arises.
This bill attempts to limit operational risk, while also balancing
present and future readiness requirements with an unrealistic and
ultimately damaging topline.
When we legislate to an arbitrary budget number rather than to a
national security strategy, we inevitably make ill-advised choices that
impact our capacity and capability to respond to global threats, such
as the crisis in Ukraine, an emboldened and increasingly aggressive
Russia, an increasingly aggressive China, and growing tensions in the
Asia Pacific.
If circumstances demand that we call up our forces to respond at this
point in time, our military options would be limited.
That is why I strongly oppose BRAC at this time. We just don't have
the money to fund it, and we have higher priorities that directly
impact the safety of our troops, and every effort and every dollar must
be focused on them.
This means funding the Marine Corps Air-Ground Task Forces, or
MAGTAFs, in SOUTHCOM and CENTCOM, which are needed to secure embassy
and military installations across the globe, a requirement made clear
after the terrorist attack at Benghazi; funding flying hour programs,
training, and depot maintenance across the services; ensuring robust
steaming days critical to fleet training; and restoring CVN-73 funding
to retain its viability as a fleet asset.
These fixes, of course, don't alleviate my concerns about readiness
shortfalls or risk to our warfighters. We here in Washington need to do
all we can to decrease such risks.
We ask a lot of our men and women who serve. We must not ask them to
go into a fight without the training and equipment they need to
succeed.
When I took my oath of office to serve in Congress, I swore that I
would abide by the principles laid out in the Constitution to ensure a
robust national defense. While I believe this bill reflects that
commitment, we cannot lose sight of the fact that FY16 is ominously
looming, and sequestration remains the law of the land.
The short-term and often shortsighted choices we have been forced to
make will only exacerbate our readiness levels.
We must continue to focus on restoring the readiness lost as a result
of sequestration, but the fact remains that the national security
requirements, as outlined in the defense strategy, far exceed the
budget.
I remain deeply concerned about the overall readiness of our force,
not just the men and women that are fighting in Afghanistan, but those
stationed around the globe. We must ensure they are properly trained,
equipped, and prepared to meet the challenges on the horizon with
overwhelming strength and superiority.
It is time to fix sequestration and start budgeting to meet our
defense strategy, not a senseless and arbitrary budget number.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from California (Mr. Garamendi), a member of the committee.
Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, congratulations to the chair of the
committee and the ranking member for putting together a unanimous
bipartisan bill. There is much to say in this bill that is good, and I
would like to say about two things. One, the ISR capabilities of the
military, particularly the Air Force, are maintained in this bill. The
U-2 and the Global Hawk will continue to operate and provide critical
intelligence to our military, operating now in the Sahel of Africa,
chasing off Boko Haram.
This bill also provides us with the continuability to get to where we
need to go. The KC-10 will remain in the force for the foreseeable
future, until it is fully replaced by the KC-46s.
All of this is good. You need to know what is going on around the
world, and you need to be able to get there, and this bill provides for
that.
However, there are issues in this bill that we need to spend some
time working on. It has been some 20 years since we have taken a hard
look at the nuclear triad, an extraordinarily expensive and
extraordinarily dangerous part of our military apparatus.
We are talking nuclear weapons here and the triad--the bombers, the
ICBMs, and the submarines.

{time} 2015

How do they fit? What do we need? How much do we really need to spend
upon them?
Also, the nuclear weapons that go with them. The rebuilding of our
nuclear weapons is a 20- to 30-year process, and we are talking about
tens of billions of dollars. Too much? Enough? Maybe. Too much?
Probably.
We also have to dispose of some 43 tons of unnecessary plutonium. How
is that going to be done at the Savannah facility? There is money in
this budget to continue a dead-end process. We ought to take a new look
at that. And there will be amendments that will be proposed.
And finally, the big elephant in the room. We are talking about
Afghanistan. $74 billion in this bill not debated, not discussed. We
must do that. It is our obligation as Members of the House of
Representatives and the representatives of the people of the United
States to talk about what we are going to do in Afghanistan, and that
needs to be done.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from
Nevada, Dr. Heck, my friend and colleague, who is a member of the Armed
Services Committee and is the chairman of the Oversight and
Investigations Subcommittee.
Mr. HECK of Nevada. Mr. Chairman, I rise to thank the committee
chairman, the gentleman from California, for his years of service to
the Nation, this body, and for his mentorship, and also to voice my
strong support for H.R. 4435, the National Defense Authorization Act of
2014.
The bill under consideration is the result of an open process that
truly reflects the bipartisan nature of the

[[Page H4548]]

House Armed Services Committee and the bipartisan support of our
military men and women.
Although fiscal realities and constrained resources have forced us to
make difficult trade-offs, the committee maintained its commitment to
those currently serving in uniform as well as to our veterans and their
families.
In last year's NDAA, Congress established the Military Compensation
and Retirement Commission to evaluate and analyze potential reforms to
pay and benefits. This report, expected to be delivered in February of
2015, will inform the debate on the future of military and retiree
compensation. As such, I am pleased that this bill rejects the
Department's request to cut the pay and benefits of our troops, which
would have included significant reforms to TRICARE and cuts to housing
and commissary benefits.
Any attempts to change pay and benefits before Congress receives the
commission's report are premature and ill-advised, and I applaud the
committee for rejecting these proposals and for remaining steadfast in
its support of our servicemembers, our veterans, and their families.
Mr. Chairman, H.R. 4435 also acknowledges the work that the Armed
Services Committee has completed over the last year to address some of
the deficiencies made evident by the tragedy in Benghazi. The
Department of Defense has determined that being prepared for an
uncertain, volatile, complex, and ambiguous security environment,
especially at remote diplomatic outposts, is the new normal that
confronts our Nation. This bill expresses concern that U.S. Africa
Command does not have sufficient assigned military forces, including
specialized military capabilities, which this new normal requires.
As such, this legislation requires the Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, to submit a report on how this evolving security
environment has changed AFRICOM's force posture and force structure
requirements. This provision will help ensure that AFRICOM receives the
resources it needs to protect posts in high-risk, high-threat areas and
the capability to respond to future crises.
Mr. Chairman, H.R. 4435 is an important bill that strikes the
appropriate balance between priorities in a fiscally constrained
environment. I urge my colleagues to support the Howard P. ``Buck''
McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gallego), a member of the committee.
Mr. GALLEGO. Mr. Chairman, I, too, would like to thank Chairman
McKeon and Ranking Member Smith for their leadership. I am glad to have
had the opportunity to work with and learn from each of them, and I
certainly wish the chairman well in his future endeavors.
This legislation marks more than 50 years of bipartisan agreements on
national defense. Not many committees in the U.S. Congress can say
that. As a new Member, I am proud to be part of that tradition.
However, the bill only buys us a little time. Unless Congress
provides relief from sequestration, next year's decisions will be
exponentially more difficult. Yet we must do everything to be sure that
our sons and daughters have what they need to be successful and safe,
both at home and abroad. That means training or weapons or materials or
supplies or equipment or machinery. Our sons and our daughters deserve
the very best.
Texas is extremely proud of its connection to our military. Important
installations like Fort Bliss, Laughlin Air Force Base, and Joint Base
San Antonio are core parts of our economy and our communities. Texas is
home to many of our warfighters--soldiers, sailors, airmen, and
marines--and both the civilian and military personnel who support them.
I, too, am proud to support our men and women in uniform. Thus, I
urge all of my colleagues to support this bill and, like today, work in
a bipartisan fashion that ends sequestration tomorrow, and from here on
out, work in that same bipartisan fashion.
May God's blessings be upon all the men and women in uniform who are
impacted by this bill and their families.
I want to thank Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith. It was a
pleasure working with them both on this bill.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentlelady from
Indiana (Mrs. Walorski), my friend and colleague, who is a member of
the Armed Services Committee.
Mrs. WALORSKI. Mr. Chairman, we have the strongest and best military
in the world.
Thanks to the hard work of Chairman McKeon and Ranking Member Smith,
this year's defense bill works within budgetary constraints to ensure
that our military continues to have the best people, the best training,
and the best hardware. This bill guards against irresponsible cuts to
pay and benefits. It improves readiness, and it provides our men and
women in uniform with the vital aircraft, ships, and ground vehicles
they need to fight and win today's increasingly complex battle space.
We also included several bipartisan commonsense provisions that build
on our important work last year to combat military sexual assault.
We hold Russia accountable for its aggression against Ukraine and its
treaty violations.
Finally, we lay the groundwork for a comprehensive defense reform
effort, including finding ways to stretch the taxpayer dollars for the
defense of this Nation.
I urge my colleagues to support this bill.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself the balance of
my time.
I just want to again thank the chairman for his leadership and thank
all of the folks who have done so much hard work in pulling this bill
together.
I will make two other quick points. One, to sort of reemphasize, we
have heard a couple of times that this bill makes the tough choices. I
can't see one at this point. You know, we have sort of dodged and
bobbed and weaved. Some of that I actually support. Some of it made
sense.
One of the issues that we have to wrestle with on the committee is
how do we preserve the industrial base? When you are talking about
making submarines or tanks or jet fighters, if you don't keep making
them, you can't say, well, we are going to shut it down for 3 years and
then we are going to start making them again, because that workforce is
gone, the plants are gone. Those decisions do have to be made.
I just think at this point, on balance, in this instance, every
single hard choice that the administration laid out on compensation--I
know health care is difficult. I think that the men and women who serve
in our military should have the best health care while they are serving
and after of anyone in this country, and they will. But there is an
important statistic.
In 1996, your average servicemember paid 27 percent of the cost of
his or her health care. This year, that number is 10 percent. Why?
Because health care costs went through the ceiling, but we didn't raise
a single penny in costs for anyone serving in the military. Is that
sustainable?
They also make cuts in some of the subsidies for the commissaries,
subsidies for housing. They looked for places where they could save
some money. Again, no BRAC. Again, the A-10 we keep. The ships we keep.
I understand those decisions, but they are building up an awful
bellwether.
And the final thing I will say is that I will again bring my
amendment on closing Guantanamo Bay. The one thing we are slowly
learning is that as we, fortunately, get fewer and fewer inmates in
Guantanamo, it becomes more and more expensive to maintain what was
supposed to be a temporary facility. Aside from all the arguments about
how the international community feels about Guantanamo, arguments that
President George W. Bush made when he said he supported closing
Guantanamo, it is the sheer cost of maintaining that prison in such an
obscure place. So I will again offer that amendment, and again we will
have a robust debate on it.
But the one point I want to make on that amendment--we have heard
people say, well, gosh, we can't release these people in the United
States. We are not

[[Page H4549]]

going to release them in the United States. We are going to lock them
up, as we currently lock up over 300 terrorists, countless mass
murderers, and some of the worst, most violent people this country
knows. They are locked up in secure facilities. We can do the same with
the dangerous inmates who remain at Guantanamo. But keeping Guantanamo
open is not intelligent, both in terms of cost and in terms of our
standing in the international community.
With that, I look forward to seeing how many of those 320 amendments
the Rules Committee is going to throw at us, and I look forward to a
robust debate starting this evening into the next couple of days.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. McKEON. I yield myself the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, this has been a great opportunity for an American to
serve his community, to be able to come to the Capitol of this great
land and serve in the House of Representatives. It is something I had
never, ever contemplated growing up. It is something I never had
thought about. But it has been a tremendous education and a tremendous
opportunity to serve. It has been a tremendous opportunity to meet some
really good people.
You know, I have heard from the polls that the Congress has a rating
of like 13 percent. That may be a little high. It may be lower than
that. I heard somebody say that our rating was so low that it is just
basically family and staff, and then after we cut the staff's health
care, that it probably was just down to family. Fortunately, I have a
large family.
But I have mentioned to members of this committee--and those who are
probably watching tonight have seen members of the committee that have
talked about this bill that we have been working on, and I hope that
they have felt of their strength, of their commitment, of their desire
to do the things that their constituents sent them here to do.
I told members of the committee recently that if people at home could
sit in on the markup, if they could sit in on some of the discussions
that members of the committee have had, I think our ratings would
probably be much higher, because these things that we grapple with
aren't easy. They are not simple ``yes'' and ``no'' answers to the
things that we deal with.
For instance, I know many of us a couple of years ago voted for the
Budget Control Act, which brought us sequestration. It also kept the
government open, because that was one of the parts of the vote. If we
had voted against it, the government would have been shut down. I think
it was a bad choice that we had to make, but I was assured that
sequestration would never happen. Well, we found out it happened, and
it is causing us a lot of problems with our national defense.
You know, the beauty of being able to serve on this committee is we
get to serve with men and women who really sacrifice much. The men and
women and their families sacrifice much to look out for our interests
both at home and abroad, and I want to thank them.
I want to thank all of the members of the committee. I want to thank
all of our staff for the tremendous work that they do. They spent hours
last night just going through these amendments, and they have been
there constantly. They are all people of great expertise and great
understanding of the issues that we face.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I would like to ask all of my colleagues to
follow this debate closely and support this bill as we come to final
passage.
With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mrs. MILLER of Michigan. Mr. Chair, earlier this year, President
Obama released his 2015 budget proposal that makes another attempt to
eliminate the entire A-10 fleet, which is the most effective weapons
system used to protect our combat forces on the ground. I know how
effective the A-10s have been in support of our troops because the
107th Fighter Squadron of the Michigan Air National Guard fly A-10s out
of Selfridge Air National Guard Base in my district.
This is not the first time that the Administration has attempted to
eliminate the A-10s from the inventory. In 2012, the defense budget
submitted by the Administration also included a proposal to retire
several A10 units, particularly those flown by the Air Guard, without
an acceptable alternative to provide the critical ground support
mission. That proposal was beaten back by those of us who realize the
value of the Warthog and, more importantly, by those who rely on its
protection.
Two weeks ago, when testifying before the Senate Armed Services
Committee, U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond Odierno told members
of the committee that our ground troops ``believe'' in the A-10
``Warthog'' and have confidence in its ability, above any other
aircraft, to protect them in combat.
Throughout this debate, Members of the Senate and the House have
reiterated their opposition to the proposed divestment by highlighting
the cost efficiency of the A-10, which costs an estimated $17,000 per
hour to operate compared to one of its proposed replacements, the B-1,
which costs $54,000 per hour to fly, and most importantly, the support
of those engaged in combat on the ground.
I am very pleased that during the House Armed Services Committee
markup of the bill we are considering today, a bipartisan majority of
that committee reaffirmed the importance of these aircraft with the
adoption of an amendment that will preserve the fleet through 2015.
Our unwavering support for the A-10 is not based on a perceived
reluctance to cut anything military, it is based on facts, the cost
effective nature of these aircraft and the strong support of our
soldiers who depend on the close air support provided by the Warthog.
I hear it time and time again from our troops who have served in
combat in defense of freedom as well as those that operate A-10s out of
Selfridge. They all agree that it is the most dependable aircraft. They
use words like ``proven, effective and reliable'' to describe it. They
say that it is the only weapon system that can do what it does, and
what it does, is protect them in combat.
Our troops put their lives in harm's way for our liberty, and we need
to make sure we do everything possible to protect them in battle. I am
glad that today a bi-partisan majority in the House agreed with me and
so many across this nation about the importance of the A-10 to our
national defense. It is my firm hope that the Senate will join us and
pass similar protections as this process moves forward.

{time} 2030

The Acting CHAIR. All time for general debate has expired.
Pursuant to the rule, the bill shall be considered for amendment
under the 5-minute rule.
In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by
the Committee on Armed Services, printed in the bill, an amendment in
the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee
print 113-44 is adopted.
The bill, as amended, shall be considered as the original bill for
the purpose of further amendment under the 5-minute rule and shall be
considered as read.
The text of the bill, as amended, is as follows:

H.R. 4435

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Howard P.
`Buck' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015''.
(b) References.--Any reference in this or any other Act to
the ``National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2015'' shall be deemed to refer to the ``Howard P. `Buck'
McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2015''.

SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF
CONTENTS.

(a) Divisions.--This Act is organized into four divisions
as follows:
(1) Division A--Department of Defense Authorizations.
(2) Division B--Military Construction Authorizations.
(3) Division C--Department of Energy National Security
Authorizations and Other Authorizations.
(4) Division D--Funding Tables.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act
is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.

DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE I--PROCUREMENT

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 101. Authorization of Appropriations.

Subtitle B--Army Programs

Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for airborne
reconnaissance low aircraft.
Sec. 112. Plan on modernization of UH-60A aircraft of Army National
Guard.

Subtitle C--Navy Programs

Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for Tomahawk block IV
missiles.
Sec. 122. Construction of San Antonio class amphibious ship.
Sec. 123. Additional oversight requirements for the undersea mobility
acquisition program of the United States Special
Operations Command.

[[Page H4550]]

Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for moored training ship
program.
Sec. 125. Limitation on availability of funds for mission modules for
Littoral Combat Ship.
Sec. 126. Extension of limitation on availability of funds for Littoral
Combat Ship.

Subtitle D--Air Force Programs

Sec. 131. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics
modernization program for C-130 aircraft.
Sec. 132. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A-10
aircraft.
Sec. 133. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of U-2
aircraft.
Sec. 134. Limitation on availability of funds for divestment or
transfer of KC-10 aircraft.
Sec. 135. Limitation on availability of funds for divestment of E-3
airborne warning and control system aircraft.

Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

Sec. 141. Comptroller General report on F-35 aircraft acquisition
program.

TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 201. Authorization of Appropriations.

Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 211. Preliminary design review of presidential aircraft
recapitalization program.
Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for armored multi-purpose
vehicle program.
Sec. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for unmanned carrier-
launched airborne surveillance and strike system.
Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for airborne
reconnaissance systems.
Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for weather satellite
follow-on system.
Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for space-based infrared
systems space data exploitation.
Sec. 217. Limitation on availability of funds for hosted payload and
wide field of view testbed of the space-based infrared
systems.
Sec. 218. Limitation on availability of funds for protected tactical
demonstration and protected military satellite
communications testbed of the advanced extremely high
frequency program.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 221. Revision to the service requirement under the Science,
Mathematics, and Research for Transformation Defense
Education Program.
Sec. 222. Revision of requirement for acquisition programs to maintain
defense research facility records.
Sec. 223. Modification to cost-sharing requirement for pilot program to
include technology protection features during research
and development of certain defense systems.

TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding.

Subtitle B--Energy and Environment

Sec. 311. Elimination of fiscal year limitation on prohibition of
payment of fines and penalties from the Environmental
Restoration Account, Defense.
Sec. 312. Biannual certification by commanders of the combatant
commands relating to the prohibition on the disposal of
waste in open-air burn pits.
Sec. 313. Exclusions from definition of ``chemical substance'' under
Toxic Substances Control Act and report on lead
ammunition.
Sec. 314. Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel
procurement requirement.
Sec. 315. Congressional notice of bulk purchase of alternative fuels
for operational use.
Sec. 316. Limitation on procurement of biofuels.
Sec. 317. Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of
biofuels refineries.

Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment

Sec. 321. Additional requirement for strategic policy on prepositioning
of materiel and equipment.
Sec. 322. Comptroller General reports on Department of Defense
prepositioning strategic policy and plan for
prepositioned stocks.
Sec. 323. Pilot program on provision of logistic support for the
conveyance of excess defense articles to allied forces.

Subtitle D--Reports

Sec. 331. Repeal of annual report on Department of Defense operation
and financial support for military museums.
Sec. 332. Report on enduring requirements and activities currently
funded through amounts authorized to be appropriated for
overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 333. Army assessment of the regionally aligned force.
Sec. 334. Report on impacts of funding reductions on military
readiness.

Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority

Sec. 341. Limitation on authority to enter into a contract for the
sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul of the F117
engine.

Subtitle F--Other Matters

Sec. 351. Clarification of authority relating to provision of
installation-support services through intergovernmental
support agreements.
Sec. 352. Sense of Congress on access to training ranges within United
States Pacific Command area of responsibility.
Sec. 353. Management of conventional ammunition inventory.

TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A--Active Forces

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum
levels.

Subtitle B--Reserve Forces

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the
reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2015 limitation on number of non-dual status
technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on
active duty for operational support.

Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 421. Military personnel.

TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally

Sec. 501. Authority to limit consideration for early retirement by
selective retirement boards to particular warrant officer
year groups and specialties.
Sec. 502. Relief from limits on percentage of officers who may be
recommended for discharge during a fiscal year using
enhanced authority for selective early discharges.
Sec. 503. Repeal of requirement for submission to Congress of annual
reports on joint officer management and promotion policy
objectives for joint officers.
Sec. 504. Options for Phase II of joint professional military
education.
Sec. 505. Limitation on number of enlisted aides authorized for
officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps.
Sec. 506. Required consideration of certain elements of command climate
in performance appraisals of commanding officers.

Subtitle B--Reserve Component Personnel Management

Sec. 511. Retention on the reserve active-status list following
nonselection for promotion of certain health professions
officers and first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior
grade) pursuing baccalaureate degrees.
Sec. 512. Chief of the National Guard Bureau role in assignment of
Directors and Deputy Directors of the Army and Air
National Guards.
Sec. 513. National Guard civil and defense support activities and
related matters.

Subtitle C--General Service Authorities

Sec. 521. Procedures for judicial review of military personnel
decisions relating to correction of military records.
Sec. 522. Additional required elements of Transition Assistance
Program.
Sec. 523. Extension of authority to conduct career flexibility
programs.
Sec. 524. Provision of information to members of the Armed Forces on
privacy rights relating to receipt of mental health
services.
Sec. 525. Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to
close a prayer outside of a religious service according
to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises
of the endorsing faith group.
Sec. 526. Department of Defense Senior Advisor on Professionalism.
Sec. 527. Removal of artificial barriers to the service of women in the
Armed Forces.

Subtitle D--Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault and Domestic
Violence Prevention and Response

Sec. 531. Improved Department of Defense information reporting and
collection of domestic violence incidents involving
members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 532. Additional duty for judicial proceedings panel regarding use
of mental health records by defense during preliminary
hearing and court-martial proceedings.
Sec. 533. Applicability of sexual assault prevention and response and
related military justice enhancements to military service
academies.
Sec. 534. Consultation with victims of sexual assault regarding
victims' preference for prosecution of offense by court-
martial or civilian court.

[[Page H4551]]

Sec. 535. Enforcement of crime victims' rights related to protections
afforded by certain Military Rules of Evidence.
Sec. 536. Minimum confinement period required for conviction of certain
sex-related offenses committed by members of the Armed
Forces.
Sec. 537. Modification of Military Rules of Evidence relating to
admissibility of general military character toward
probability of innocence.
Sec. 538. Confidential review of characterization of terms of discharge
of members of the Armed Forces who are victims of sexual
offenses.
Sec. 539. Consistent application of rules of privilege afforded under
the Military Rules of Evidence.

Subtitle E--Military Family Readiness

Sec. 545. Earlier determination of dependent status with respect to
transitional compensation for dependents of members
separated for dependent abuse.
Sec. 546. Improved consistency in data collection and reporting in
Armed Forces suicide prevention efforts.
Sec. 547. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are
members of the Armed Forces.

Subtitle F--Education and Training Opportunities

Sec. 551. Authorized duration of foreign and cultural exchange
activities at military service academies.
Sec. 552. Pilot program to assist members of the Armed Forces in
obtaining post-service employment.

Subtitle G--Defense Dependents' Education

Sec. 561. Continuation of authority to assist local educational
agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed
Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 562. Authority to employ non-United States citizens as teachers in
Department of Defense overseas dependents' school system.
Sec. 563. Expansion of functions of the Advisory Council on Dependents'
Education to include domestic dependent elementary and
secondary schools.
Sec. 564. Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and
transition of military dependent students.
Sec. 565. Amendments to the Impact Aid Improvement Act of 2012.

Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards

Sec. 571. Medals for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees
of the Department of Defense who were killed or wounded
in an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist
organization.
Sec. 572. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge.
Sec. 573. Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to
Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael
Peralta.

Subtitle I--Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements

Sec. 581. Secretary of Defense review and report on prevention of
suicide among members of United States Special Operations
Forces.
Sec. 582. Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of
separation of members of the Armed Forces who made
unrestricted reports of sexual assault.
Sec. 583. Comptroller General report regarding management of personnel
records of members of the National Guard.
Sec. 584. Study on gender integration in defense operation planning and
execution.
Sec. 585. Deadline for submission of report containing results of
review of Office of Diversity Management and Equal
Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases.

Subtitle J--Other Matters

Sec. 591. Inspection of outpatient residential facilities occupied by
recovering service members.
Sec. 592. Working Group on Integrated Disability Evaluation System.
Sec. 593. Sense of Congress regarding fulfilling promise to leave no
member of the Armed Forces unaccounted in Afghanistan.

TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances

Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates
of basic allowance for housing under certain
circumstances.
Sec. 602. No fiscal year 2015 increase in basic pay for general and
flag officers.

Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay
authorities for health care professionals.
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for
nuclear officers.
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37
consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus
authorities.
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of
other title 37 bonuses and special pays.

Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation

Sec. 621. Authority to enter into contracts for the provision of
relocation services.

Subtitle D--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality
Benefits and Operations

Sec. 631. Authority of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities to enter
into contracts with other Federal agencies and
instrumentalities to provide and obtain certain goods and
services.
Sec. 632. Review of management, food, and pricing options for defense
commissary system.
Sec. 633. Restriction on implementing any new Department of Defense
policy to limit, restrict, or ban the sale of certain
items on military installations.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 641. Anonymous survey of members of the Armed Forces regarding
their preferences for military pay and benefits.

TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits

Sec. 701. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 702. Clarification of provision of food to former members and
dependents not receiving inpatient care in military
medical treatment facilities.

Subtitle B--Health Care Administration

Sec. 711. Cooperative health care agreements between the military
departments and non-military health care entities.
Sec. 712. Surveys on continued viability of TRICARE Standard and
TRICARE Extra.
Sec. 713. Limitation on transfer or elimination of graduate medical
education billets.
Sec. 714. Review of military health system modernization study.

Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters

Sec. 721. Extension of authority for joint Department of Defense-
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility
Demonstration Fund.
Sec. 722. Designation and responsibilities of senior medical advisor
for Armed Forces Retirement Home.
Sec. 723. Research regarding Alzheimer's disease.
Sec. 724. Acquisition strategy for health care professional staffing
services.
Sec. 725. Pilot program on medication therapy management under TRICARE
program.
Sec. 726. Report on reduction of Prime Service Areas.
Sec. 727. Comptroller General report on transition of care for post-
traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury.
Sec. 728. Briefing on hospitals in arrears in payments to Department of
Defense.

TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED
MATTERS

Subtitle A--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures,
and Limitations

Sec. 801. Extension to United States Transportation Command of
authorities relating to prohibition on contracting with
the enemy.
Sec. 802. Extension of contract authority for advanced component
development or prototype units.
Sec. 803. Amendment relating to authority of the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency to carry out certain prototype
projects.
Sec. 804. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available
for contract services.

Subtitle B--Industrial Base Matters

Sec. 811. Three-year extension of and amendments to test program for
negotiation of comprehensive small business
subcontracting plans.
Sec. 812. Improving opportunities for service-disabled veteran-owned
small businesses.
Sec. 813. Plan for improving data on bundled and consolidated
contracts.
Sec. 814. Authority to provide education to small businesses on certain
requirements of Arms Export Control Act.
Sec. 815. Prohibition on reverse auctions for covered contracts.
Sec. 816. SBA surety bond guarantee.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 821. Certification of effectiveness for Air Force information
technology contracting.
Sec. 822. Airlift service.
Sec. 823. Compliance with requirements for senior Department of Defense
officials seeking employment with defense contractors.
Sec. 824. Procurement of personal protective equipment.
Sec. 825. Prohibition on funds for contracts violating Executive Order
No. 11246.
Sec. 826. Requirement for policies and standard checklist in
procurement of services.

[[Page H4552]]

TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management

Sec. 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department
of the Navy and Marine Corps.
Sec. 902. Additional responsibility for Director of Operational Test
and Evaluation.
Sec. 903. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and
Environment.
Sec. 904. Requirement for congressional briefing before divesting of
Defense Finance and Accounting Service functions.
Sec. 905. Combatant command efficiency plan.
Sec. 906. Requirement for plan to reduce geographic combatant commands
to four by fiscal year 2020.
Sec. 907. Office of Net Assessment.
Sec. 908. Amendments relating to organization and management of the
Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 909. Periodic review of Department of Defense management
headquarters.

Subtitle B--Total Force Management

Sec. 911. Modifications to biennial strategic workforce plan relating
to senior management, functional, and technical workforce
of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 912. Repeal of extension of Comptroller General report on
inventory.
Sec. 913. Assignment of certain new requirements based on
determinations of cost-efficiency.
Sec. 914. Prohibition on conversion of functions performed by civilian
or contractor personnel to performance by military
personnel.
Sec. 915. Notification of compliance with section relating to
procurement of services.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 921. Extension of authority to waive reimbursement of costs of
activities for nongovernmental personnel at Department of
Defense regional centers for security studies.
Sec. 922. Authority to require employees of the Department of Defense
and Members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine
Corps to occupy quarters on a rental basis while
performing official travel.
Sec. 923. Single standard mileage reimbursement rate for privately
owned automobiles of Government employees and members of
the uniformed services.

TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Financial Matters

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Repeal of limitation on Inspector General audits of certain
financial statements.
Sec. 1003. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security
Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization
and naval reactors.
Sec. 1004. Management of Defense information technology systems.

Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities

Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counterdrug and
counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.
Sec. 1012. Three-year extension of authority of Department of Defense
to provide additional support for counterdrug activities
of other governmental agencies.
Sec. 1013. Submittal of biannual reports on use of funds in the drug
interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide
account on the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House
of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations
of the Senate.
Sec. 1014. National Guard drug interdiction and counter-drug
activities.
Sec. 1015. Sense of Congress on Mexico and Central America.

Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards

Sec. 1021. Definition of combatant and support vessel for purposes of
the annual plan and certification relating to budgeting
for construction of naval vessels.
Sec. 1022. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund.
Sec. 1023. Elimination of requirement that a qualified aviator or naval
flight officer be in command of an inactivated nuclear-
powered aircraft carrier before decommissioning.
Sec. 1024. Limitation on expenditure of funds until commencement of
planning of refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S.
George Washington.
Sec. 1025. Sense of Congress recognizing the anniversary of the sinking
of U.S.S. Thresher.
Sec. 1026. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of
Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships.

Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

Sec. 1031. Extension of authority to make rewards for combating
terrorism.
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify
facilities in the United States to house detainees
transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1033. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release
of individuals detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Subtitle E--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

Sec. 1041. Modification of Department of Defense authority for
humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled
conventional munitions assistance programs.
Sec. 1042. Authority to accept voluntary services of law students and
persons studying to be paralegals.
Sec. 1043. Expansion of authority for Secretary of Defense to use the
Department of Defense reimbursement rate for
transportation services provided to certain non-
Department of Defense entities.
Sec. 1044. Repeal of authority relating to use of military
installations by civil reserve air fleet contractors.
Sec. 1045. Certification and limitation on availability of funds for
aviation foreign internal defense program.
Sec. 1046. Submittal of procedures and report relating to sensitive
military operations.
Sec. 1047. Limitation on use of Russian-flagged airlift aircraft to
support the airlift movement requirements of the United
States Transportation Command.
Sec. 1048. Prohibition on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air
Force Base until completion of assessments by Secretary
of Defense and Government Accountability Office.
Sec. 1049. Limitation on removal of C-130 aircraft.
Sec. 1050. Conditions on Army National Guard and active Army force
structure changes pending Comptroller General report.

Subtitle F--Studies and Reports

Sec. 1061. Protection of defense mission-critical infrastructure from
electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems.
Sec. 1062. Response of the Department of Defense to compromises of
classified information.
Sec. 1063. Report and briefing to Congress on procurement and
inspection of armored commercial passenger-carrying
vehicles to transport civilian employees of the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 1064. Study on joint analytic capability of the Department of
Defense.

Subtitle G--Other Matters

Sec. 1071. Technical and clerical amendments.
Sec. 1072. Sale or donation of excess personal property for border
security activities.
Sec. 1073. Revision to statute of limitations for aviation insurance
claims.
Sec. 1074. Pilot program for the human terrain system.
Sec. 1075. Unmanned aircraft systems and national airspace.
Sec. 1076. Sense of Congress on the life and achievements of Dr. James
R. Schlesinger.
Sec. 1077. Reform of quadrennial defense review.
Sec. 1078. Resubmission of 2014 quadrennial defense review.
Sec. 1079. Sense of Congress regarding counter-improvised explosive
devices.
Sec. 1080. Enhancing presence and capabilities and readiness posture of
United States military in Europe.
Sec. 1081. Determination and disclosure of transportation costs
incurred by the Secretary of Defense for congressional
trips outside the United States.

TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation
on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for
Federal civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant
allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on
official duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1103. Revision to list of Science and Technology Reinvention
Laboratories.
Sec. 1104. Permanent authority for experimental personnel program for
scientific and technical personnel.
Sec. 1105. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of
Defense research and engineering facilities.
Sec. 1106. Judicial review of Merit Systems Protection Board decisions
relating to whistleblowers.

TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

Subtitle A--Assistance and Training

Sec. 1201. One-year extension of Global Security Contingency Fund.
Sec. 1202. Notice to Congress on certain assistance under authority to
conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign
countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of
mass destruction.
Sec. 1203. Enhanced authority for provision of support to foreign
military liaison officers of foreign countries while
assigned to the Department of Defense.

[[Page H4553]]

Sec. 1204. Annual report on human rights vetting and verification
procedures of the Department of Defense.

Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan

Sec. 1211. Extension of Commanders' Emergency Response Program in
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1212. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain
coalition nations for support provided to United States
military operations.
Sec. 1213. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign
forces supporting or participating with the United States
Armed Forces.
Sec. 1214. Report on progress toward security and stability in
Afghanistan under Operation Resolute Support.
Sec. 1215. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to
Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 150 percent of all
taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are
not reimbursed by Afghanistan.
Sec. 1216. United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National
Security Forces through the end of fiscal year 2018.
Sec. 1217. Sense of Congress on United States military commitment to
Operation Resolute Support in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1218. Extension of Afghan special immigrant program.

Subtitle C--Matters Relating to the Russian Federation

Sec. 1221. Limitation on military contact and cooperation between the
United States and the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1222. Limitation on use of funds with respect to certification of
certain flights by the Russian Federation under the
Treaty on Open Skies.
Sec. 1223. Limitations on providing certain missile defense information
to the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds to transfer missile
defense information to the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1225. Report on non-compliance by the Russian Federation of its
obligations under the INF Treaty.
Sec. 1226. Sense of Congress regarding Russian aggression toward
Ukraine.
Sec. 1227. Annual report on military and security developments
involving the Russian Federation.

Subtitle D--Matters Relating to the Asia-Pacific Region

Sec. 1231. Strategy to prioritize United States interests in the United
States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility and
implementation plan.
Sec. 1232. Modifications to annual report on military and security
developments involving the People's Republic of China.
Sec. 1233. Report on goals and objectives guiding military engagement
with Burma.
Sec. 1234. Report on Department of Defense munitions strategy for
United States Pacific Command.
Sec. 1235. Missile defense cooperation.
Sec. 1236. Maritime capabilities of Taiwan and its contribution to
regional peace and stability.
Sec. 1237. Independent assessment on countering anti-access and area-
denial strategies and capabilities in the Asia-Pacific
region.
Sec. 1238. Sense of Congress reaffirming security commitment to Japan.
Sec. 1239. Sense of Congress on opportunities to strengthen
relationship between the United States and the Republic
of Korea.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 1241. Extension of authority for support of special operations to
combat terrorism.
Sec. 1242. One-year extension of authorization for non-conventional
assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1243. Extension and modification of authority to support
operations and activities of the Office of Security
Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1244. Modification of national security planning guidance to deny
safe havens to al-Qaeda and its violent extremist
affiliates.
Sec. 1245. Enhanced authority to acquire goods and services of Djibouti
in support of Department of Defense activities in United
States Africa Command area of responsibility.
Sec. 1246. Strategic framework for United States security force
assistance and cooperation in the European and Eurasian
regions.
Sec. 1247. Requirement of Department of Defense to continue
implementation of United States Strategy to Prevent and
Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally and
participation in Interagency Working Group.
Sec. 1248. Department of Defense situational awareness of economic and
financial activity.
Sec. 1249. Treatment of the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the
Patriotic Union of Kurdistan under the Immigration and
Nationality Act.
Sec. 1250. Prohibition on integration of certain missile defense
systems.

Subtitle F--Reports and Sense of Congress Provisions

Sec. 1261. Report on ``New Normal'' and general mission requirements of
United States Africa Command.
Sec. 1262. Report on contractors with the Department of Defense that
have conducted significant transactions with Iranian
persons or the Government of Iran.
Sec. 1263. Reports on nuclear program of Iran.
Sec. 1264. Sense of Congress on United States presence and cooperation
in the Arabian Gulf region to deter Iran.
Sec. 1265. Sense of Congress on modernization of defense capabilities
of Poland.

TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction Programs and
Funds.
Sec. 1302. Funding Allocations.
Sec. 1303. Limitation on availability of funds for Cooperative Threat
Reduction activities with Russian Federation.

TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A--Military Programs

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1405. Defense Health Program.

Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile

Sec. 1411. Revisions to previously authorized disposals from the
National Defense Stockpile.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of
Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility
Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health
Care Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement
Home.

TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Procurement.
Sec. 1503. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1504. Military personnel.
Sec. 1505. Other appropriations.

Subtitle B--Financial Matters

Sec. 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1512. Special transfer authority.

Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters

Sec. 1521. Continuation of existing limitations on the use of funds in
the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1522. Use of and transfer of funds from Joint Improvised Explosive
Device Defeat Fund.

TITLE XVI--STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, CYBER, AND INTELLIGENCE MATTERS

Subtitle A--Space Activities

Sec. 1601. Department of Defense Space Security and Defense Program.
Sec. 1602. Evolved expendable launch vehicle notification.
Sec. 1603. Satellite communications responsibilities of Executive Agent
for Space.
Sec. 1604. Liquid rocket engine development program.
Sec. 1605. Pilot program for acquisition of commercial satellite
communication services.

Subtitle B--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

Sec. 1611. Assessment and limitation on availability of funds for
intelligence activities and programs of United States
Special Operations Command and special operations forces.
Sec. 1612. Annual briefing on the intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands.
Sec. 1613. One-year extension of report on imagery intelligence and
geospatial information support provided to regional
organizations and security alliances.
Sec. 1614. Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive
Agent.
Sec. 1615. Air Force intelligence organization.
Sec. 1616. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation.

Subtitle C--Cyberspace-Related Matters

Sec. 1621. Executive agent for cyber test and training ranges.

Subtitle D--Nuclear Forces

Sec. 1631. Preparation of annual budget request regarding nuclear
weapons.
Sec. 1632. Independent review of the personnel reliability program of
the Department of Defense and the human reliability
program of the Department of Energy.
Sec. 1633. Assessment of nuclear weapon secondary requirement.
Sec. 1634. Retention of missile silos.
Sec. 1635. Certification on nuclear force structure.

Subtitle E--Missile Defense Programs

Sec. 1641. Theater air and missile defense of allies of the United
States.

[[Page H4554]]

Sec. 1642. Sense of Congress on procurement and deployment of
capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle.

TITLE XVII--DEFENSE AUDIT ADVISORY PANEL ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
AUDITABILITY

Sec. 1701. Findings and purposes.
Sec. 1702. Establishment of Advisory Panel on Department of Defense
Audit Readiness.
Sec. 1703. Duties of the Advisory Panel.
Sec. 1704. Powers of the Advisory Panel.
Sec. 1705. Advisory Panel personnel matters.
Sec. 1706. Termination of the Advisory Panel.

DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be
specified by law.
Sec. 2003. Effective date.

TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2004 project.
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2013 projects.
Sec. 2106. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011
project.
Sec. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012
projects.

TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2012 projects.
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2014 project.
Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.
Sec. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012
projects.

TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2302. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2303. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2008 project.
Sec. 2304. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011
project.
Sec. 2305. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012
projects.

TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Sec. 2404. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011
projects.
Sec. 2405. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012
projects.
Sec. 2406. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain
fiscal year 2015 projects pending submission of required
reports.

Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization
construction, defense-wide.
Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2000 project.

TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.

TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.

Subtitle B--Other Matters

Sec. 2611. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain
fiscal year 2012 projects.
Sec. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2013 project.
Sec. 2613. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011
project.

TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and
closure activities funded through Department of Defense
base closure account.

Subtitle B--Prohibition on Additional BRAC Round

Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and
Closure (BRAC) round.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

Sec. 2721. Force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory and
assessment of infrastructure necessary to support the
force structure.
Sec. 2722. Modification of property disposal procedures under base
realignment and closure process.
Sec. 2723. Final settlement of claims regarding caretaker agreement for
former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah.

TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes

Sec. 2801. Prevention of circumvention of military construction laws.
Sec. 2802. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor
military construction.
Sec. 2803. Use of one-step turn-key contractor selection procedures for
additional facility projects.
Sec. 2804. Extension of limitation on construction projects in European
Command area of responsibility.

Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

Sec. 2811. Consultation requirement in connection with Department of
Defense major land acquisitions.
Sec. 2812. Renewals, extensions, and succeeding leases for financial
institutions operating on military installations.
Sec. 2813. Arsenal Installation Reutilization Authority.
Sec. 2814. Deposit of reimbursed funds to cover administrative expenses
relating to certain real property transactions.
Sec. 2815. Special easement acquisition authority, Pacific Missile
Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii.
Sec. 2816. National security considerations for inclusion of Federal
property on National Register of Historic Places or
designation as National Historic Landmark under the
National Historic Preservation Act.

Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment

Sec. 2831. Repeal or modification of certain restrictions on
realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific
Region.

Subtitle D--Land Conveyances

Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial, La Jolla,
California.
Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, former Walter Reed Army Hospital, District
of Columbia.
Sec. 2843. Transfers of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Frank D.
Merrill and Lake Lanier, Georgia.
Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.
Sec. 2845. Modification of conditions on land conveyance, Joliet Army
Ammunition Plant, Illinois.
Sec. 2846. Land conveyance, Robert H. Dietz Army Reserve Center,
Kingston, New York.
Sec. 2847. Exercise of reversionary interest, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma.
Sec. 2848. Land conveyance, Hanford Site, Washington.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

Sec. 2861. Memorial to the victims of the shooting attack at the
Washington Navy Yard.
Sec. 2862. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security
Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for
Security Studies.
Sec. 2863. Redesignation of Pohakuloa Training Area in Hawaii as
Pohakuloa Training Center.
Sec. 2864. Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial
in Riverside, California.
Sec. 2865. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National
Historical Park, Ohio.
Sec. 2866. Manhattan Project National Historical Park.

TITLE XXIX--MILITARY LAND TRANSFERS AND WITHDRAWALS TO SUPPORT
READINESS AND SECURITY

Subtitle A--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada

Sec. 2901. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Station
Fallon, Nevada.
Sec. 2902. Water rights.
Sec. 2903. Withdrawal.

[[Page H4555]]

Subtitle B--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms,
California

Sec. 2911. Redesignation of Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle
Recreation Area, California.

Subtitle C--Bureau of Land Management Withdrawn Military Lands
Efficiency and Savings

Sec. 2921. Elimination of termination date for public land withdrawals
and reservations under Military Lands Withdrawal Act of
1999.

Subtitle D--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land for Naval Air
Weapons Station China Lake, California.

Subtitle E--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

Sec. 2941. Additional withdrawal and reservation of public land to
support White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico.

DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other Defense Activities.
Sec. 3104. Energy Security and Assurance.

Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations

Sec. 3111. Design and use of prototypes of nuclear weapons for
intelligence purposes.
Sec. 3112. Authorized personnel levels of National Nuclear Security
Administration.
Sec. 3113. Cost containment for Uranium Capabilities Replacement
Project.
Sec. 3114. Plutonium pit production capacity.
Sec. 3115. Definition of baseline and threshold for stockpile life
extension project.
Sec. 3116. Production of nuclear warhead for long-range standoff
weapon.
Sec. 3117. Disposition of weapons-usable plutonium.
Sec. 3118. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the
Administrator for Nuclear Security.
Sec. 3119. Additional limitation on availability of funds for Office of
the Administrator for Nuclear Security.
Sec. 3120. Limitation on availability of funds for nonproliferation
activities between the United States and the Russian
Federation.
Sec. 3121. Limitation on availability of funds for defense nuclear
nonproliferation activities at sites in the Russian
Federation.

Subtitle C--Plans and Reports

Sec. 3131. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear
Security Administration.
Sec. 3132. Analysis and report on W88 Alt 370 program high explosives
options.
Sec. 3133. Analysis of existing facilities.

Subtitle D--Other Matters

Sec. 3141. Technical corrections to Atomic Energy Defense Act.
Sec. 3142. Technical corrections to National Nuclear Security
Administration Act.

TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Sec. 3201. Authorization.
Sec. 3202. Inspector General of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board.
Sec. 3203. Number of employees of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board.

TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.

TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security
aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2015.
Sec. 3502. Special rule for DD-17.
Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress on the role of domestic maritime industry
in national security.

DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.

TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT

Sec. 4101. Procurement.

TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.

TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.

TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL

Sec. 4401. Military personnel.

TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.

TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Sec. 4601. Military construction.

TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs.

SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.

In this Act, the term ``congressional defense committees''
has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of
title 10, United States Code.

DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE I--PROCUREMENT

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the
Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as
specified in the funding table in section 4101.

Subtitle B--Army Programs

SEC. 111. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIRBORNE
RECONNAISSANCE LOW AIRCRAFT.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for aircraft
procurement, Army, for the modernization of the
communications intelligence subsystem of airborne
reconnaissance low aircraft may be obligated or expended
until the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional
defense committees a report that--
(1) specifies which such subsystem will be used to
modernize such aircraft;
(2) explains how such subsystem was selected;
(3) identifies the alternatives to such subsystem that the
Secretary considered during such selection; and
(4) details how such subsystem will be integrated into the
signals intelligence modernization plan of the Army.

SEC. 112. PLAN ON MODERNIZATION OF UH-60A AIRCRAFT OF ARMY
NATIONAL GUARD.

(a) Plan.--Not later than March 15, 2015, the Secretary of
the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a prioritized plan for modernizing the entire fleet of UH-60A
aircraft of the Army National Guard.
(b) Additional Elements.--The plan under subsection (a)
shall set forth the following:
(1) A detailed timeline for the modernization of the entire
fleet of UH-60A aircraft of the Army National Guard.
(2) The number of UH-60L, UH-60L Digital, and UH-60M
aircraft that the Army National Guard will possess upon
completion of such modernization plan.
(3) The cost, by year, associated with such modernization
plan.

Subtitle C--Navy Programs

SEC. 121. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR TOMAHAWK BLOCK
IV MISSILES.

(a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.--
(1) In general.--Subject to section 2306b of title 10,
United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into
one or more multiyear contracts for a period of not more than
five years, beginning with the fiscal year 2015 program year,
for the procurement of Tomahawk block IV missiles.
(2) Submission of written certification by secretary of
defense.--For purposes of carrying out subsection (i)(1) of
such section 2306b with respect to a contract entered into
under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall substitute ``the
date that is 45 days before the date on which the Secretary
enters into a contract under section 121 of the Howard P.
`Buck' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015'' for ``March 1 of the year in which the Secretary
requests legislative authority to enter into such contract''.
(b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any
obligation of the United States to make a payment under the
contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 is subject
to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for
such later fiscal year.

SEC. 122. CONSTRUCTION OF SAN ANTONIO CLASS AMPHIBIOUS SHIP.

(a) In General.--The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a
contract beginning with the fiscal year 2015 program year for
the procurement of one San Antonio class amphibious ship. The
Secretary may employ incremental funding for such
procurement.
(b) Condition on Out-year Contract Payments.--A contract
entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any
obligation of the United States to make a payment under such
contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 is
subject to the availability of appropriations for that
purpose for such fiscal year.

SEC. 123. ADDITIONAL OVERSIGHT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE UNDERSEA
MOBILITY ACQUISITION PROGRAM OF THE UNITED
STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND.

(a) Limitation on Milestone B Decision.--The Commander of
the United States Special Operations Command may not make any
Milestone B acquisition decisions with respect to a covered
element unless--
(1) the Commander has submitted to the congressional
defense committees the transition plan under subsection
(b)(2);
(2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics has submitted to such committees
the certification under subsection (c)(1); and
(3) the Secretary of the Navy has completed the review
under subsection (d)(1).
(b) Transition Plan.--
(1) In general.--The Commander shall develop a transition
plan for undersea mobility capabilities that includes the
following:
(A) A description of the current capabilities provided by
covered elements as of the date of the plan.
(B) An identification and description of the requirements
of the Commander for future undersea mobility platforms.
(C) An identification of resources necessary to fulfill the
requirements identified in subparagraph (B).

[[Page H4556]]

(D) A description of the technology readiness levels of any
covered element currently under development as of the date of
the plan.
(E) An identification of any potential gaps or projected
shortfall in capability, along with steps to mitigate any
such gap or shortfall.
(F) Any other matters the Commander determines appropriate.
(2) Submission.--The Commander shall submit to the
congressional defense committees the transition plan under
paragraph (1).
(c) Certification.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided by paragraph (2), the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics shall certify an acquisition strategy for covered
elements developed by the Commander if such strategy--
(A) is based on reasonable cost and schedule estimates to
execute the product development and production plan;
(B) the technology in the program has been demonstrated in
a relevant environment; and
(C) the program complies with all relevant policies,
regulations, and directives of the Secretary of Defense.
(2) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the
certification requirement in paragraph (1) if the Secretary--
(A) determines that such certification is not in the
interests of the United States; and
(B) notifies the congressional defense committees of such
determination, including justifications for making the
waiver.
(d) Review.--The Secretary of the Navy shall--
(1) review the transition plan under subsection (b)(1) and
the acquisition strategy described in subsection (c)(1); and
(2) ensure that the development of requirements for the
Navy and the acquisition plans of the Navy take into account
such transition plan and acquisition strategy.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``covered element'' means any of the following
elements of the undersea mobility acquisition program of the
United States Special Operations Command:
(A) The dry combat submersible-light program.
(B) The dry combat submersible-medium program.
(C) The next-generation submarine shelter program.
(D) Any new dry combat submersible developed under the
undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States
Special Operations Command after the date of the enactment of
this Act.
(2) The term ``Milestone B approval'' has the meaning given
that term in section 2366(e) of title 10, United States Code.
(f) Conforming Repeal.--Section 144 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1325) is repealed.

SEC. 124. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR MOORED
TRAINING SHIP PROGRAM.

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for
shipbuilding and construction, Navy, for design, conversion,
modification, or construction relating to the moored training
ship program of the Navy, not more than 80 percent may be
obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed
following the date on which the Secretary of Defense
certifies to the congressional defense committees that--
(1) the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight
Council has reviewed and approved the need for two additional
moored training ships;
(2) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
has reviewed and certified the cost estimates of the moored
training ship program; and
(3) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics has reviewed and approved the
budget, schedule, and construction plans for such two
additional moored training ships.

SEC. 125. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR MISSION
MODULES FOR LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the
procurement of additional mission modules for the Littoral
Combat Ship program may be obligated or expended until the
Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense
committees each of the following:
(1) The Milestone B program goals for cost, schedule, and
performance for each increment.
(2) Certification by the Director of Operational Test and
Evaluation with respect to the total number for each module
type that is required to perform all necessary operational
testing.

SEC. 126. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS
FOR LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP.

Section 124(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 693) is
amended by striking ``this Act or otherwise made available
for fiscal year 2014'' and inserting ``this Act, the Howard
P. `Buck' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2015, or otherwise made available for fiscal
years 2014 or 2015''.

Subtitle D--Air Force Programs

SEC. 131. PROHIBITION ON CANCELLATION OR MODIFICATION OF
AVIONICS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FOR C-130
AIRCRAFT.

(a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be used to--
(1) take any action to cancel or modify the avionics
modernization program of record for C-130 aircraft; or
(2) initiate an alternative communication, navigation,
surveillance, and air traffic management program for C-130
aircraft that is designed or intended to replace the avionics
modernization program described in paragraph (1).
(b) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for operation and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary
of the Air Force, not more than 75 percent may be obligated
or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following
the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to
the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has
obligated the funds authorized to be appropriated or
otherwise made available for fiscal years prior to fiscal
year 2015 for the avionics modernization program of record
for C-130 aircraft.

SEC. 132. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT
OF A-10 AIRCRAFT.

(a) Prohibition.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be
obligated or expended to retire A-10 aircraft.
(b) Comptroller General Study.--
(1) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States
shall conduct a study evaluating the platforms of the Air
Force used, as of the date of the study, to conduct close air
support missions.
(2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a report on the study
under paragraph (1), including--
(A) the cost per airframe carrying out the close air
support missions described in such paragraph;
(B) the capabilities of each platform evaluated under such
study; and
(C) a determination by the Comptroller General with respect
to whether such airframes other than A-10 aircraft are able
to successfully carry out such close air support missions.

SEC. 133. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT
OF U-2 AIRCRAFT.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make
significant changes to retire, prepare to retire, or place in
storage U-2 aircraft.

SEC. 134. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DIVESTMENT
OR TRANSFER OF KC-10 AIRCRAFT.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air
Force may be obligated or expended during such fiscal year to
divest or transfer, or prepare to divest or transfer, KC-10
aircraft.

SEC. 135. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DIVESTMENT
OF E-3 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM
AIRCRAFT.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to divest
more than four E-3 airborne warning and control system
aircraft, or disestablish any units of the active or reserve
components associated with such aircraft, until a period of
15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary
of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense
committees a report consisting of--
(1) a certification that the Secretary is able to meet all
priority requirements of the commanders of the combatant
commands relating to such aircraft with a planned force of 24
such aircraft; and
(2) a detailed explanation how the Secretary will meet such
requirements with such planned force.

Subtitle E--Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters

SEC. 141. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON F-35 AIRCRAFT
ACQUISITION PROGRAM.

(a) Annual Report.--Not later than April 15, 2015, and each
year thereafter until the F-35 aircraft acquisition program
enters into full-rate production, the Comptroller General of
the United States shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report reviewing such program.
(b) Matters Included.--Each report under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) The extent to which the F-35 aircraft acquisition
program is meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals.
(2) The progress and results of developmental and
operational testing.
(3) The progress of the procurement and manufacturing of F-
35 aircraft.
(4) An assessment of any plans or efforts of the Secretary
of Defense to improve the efficiency of the procurement and
manufacturing of F-35 aircraft.

TITLE II--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 for the use of the Department of Defense for
research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in
the funding table in section 4201.

Subtitle B--Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations

SEC. 211. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW OF PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT
RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM.

The milestone decision authority (as defined in section
2366b(g) of title 10, United States

[[Page H4557]]

Code) may not make a waiver under section 2366b(d) of title
10, United States Code, with respect to the presidential
aircraft recapitalization program of the Air Force.

SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ARMORED
MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE PROGRAM.

(a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for
the armored multi-purpose vehicle program, not more than 80
percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which
the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional
defense committees the report under subsection (b)(1).
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the
Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional
defense committee a report on the armored multi-purpose
vehicle program.
(2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) An identification of the existing capability gaps of
the M-113 family of vehicles assigned, as of the date of the
report, to units outside of combat brigades.
(B) An identification of the mission roles that are in
common between--
(i) such vehicles assigned to units outside of combat
brigades; and
(ii) the vehicles examined in the armor brigade combat team
during the armored multi-purpose vehicle analysis of
alternatives.
(C) The estimated timeline and the rough order of magnitude
of funding requirements associated with complete M-113 family
of vehicles divestiture within the units outside of combat
brigades and the risk associated with delaying the
replacement of such vehicles.
(D) A description of the requirements for force protection,
mobility, and size, weight, power, and cooling capacity for
the mission roles of M-113 family of vehicles assigned to
units outside of combat brigades.
(E) A discussion of the mission roles of the M-113 family
of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades that
are comparable to the mission roles of the M-113 family of
vehicles assigned to armor brigade combat teams.
(F) A discussion of whether a one-for-one replacement of
the M-113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of
combat brigades is likely.
(G) With respect to mission roles, a discussion of any
substantive distinctions that exist in the capabilities of
the M-113 family of vehicles that are needed based on the
level of the unit to which the vehicle is assigned (not
including combat brigades).
(H) A discussion of the relative priority of fielding among
the mission roles.
(I) An assessment for the feasibility of incorporating
medical wheeled variants within the armor brigade combat
teams.

SEC. 213. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR UNMANNED
CARRIER-LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND
STRIKE SYSTEM.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and
evaluation, Navy, for the unmanned carrier-launched airborne
surveillance and strike system may be obligated or expended
to award a contract for air vehicle segment development until
a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which
the Secretary of Defense submits the report under subsection
(b).
(b) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2014, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report that--
(1) certifies that a review of the requirements for air
vehicle segments of the unmanned carrier-launched
surveillance and strike system is complete; and
(2) includes the results of such review.

SEC. 214. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIRBORNE
RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS.

(a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force,
for imaging and targeting support of airborne reconnaissance
systems, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or
expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air
Force submits to the appropriate congressional committees--
(1) a detailed plan regarding using such funds for such
purpose during fiscal year 2015; and
(2) a strategic plan for the funding of advanced airborne
reconnaissance technologies supporting manned and unmanned
systems.
(b) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 215. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR WEATHER
SATELLITE FOLLOW-ON SYSTEM.

(a) Manifest.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall--
(1) place the last remaining satellite of the defense
meteorological satellite program on the launch manifest for
the evolved expendable launch vehicle program; and
(2) establish an additional launch, for acquisition during
fiscal year 2015, under the evolved expendable launch vehicle
program using full and open competition among certified
providers.
(b) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force,
for the weather satellite follow-on system, not more than 25
percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which
the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional
defense committees the plan under subsection (c).
(c) Plan Required.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall
develop a plan to meet the meteorological and oceanographic
collection requirements of the Joint Requirements Oversight
Council. The plan shall include the following:
(1) How the Secretary will launch and use existing assets
of the defense meteorological satellite program.
(2) How the Secretary will use other sources of data, such
as civil, commercial satellite weather data, and
international partnerships, to meet such requirements.
(3) An explanation of the relevant costs and schedule.
(4) The requirements of the weather satellite follow-on
system.

SEC. 216. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SPACE-BASED
INFRARED SYSTEMS SPACE DATA EXPLOITATION.

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research,
development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for data
exploitation under the space-based infrared systems, not more
than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date
on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the
congressional defense committees certification that--
(1) such funds will be used in support of data exploitation
of the current space-based infrared systems program of
record, including the scanning and staring sensor; or
(2) the data from such program of record, including such
scanning and starring sensor, is being fully exploited and no
further efforts are warranted.

SEC. 217. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR HOSTED
PAYLOAD AND WIDE FIELD OF VIEW TESTBED OF THE
SPACE-BASED INFRARED SYSTEMS.

(a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force,
for the hosted payload and wide field of view testbed of the
space-based infrared systems program, not more than 50
percent may be obligated or expended on alternative
approaches to the program of record of such program until--
(1) the completion of the ongoing analysis of alternatives
for such program of record; and
(2) a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on
which the Secretary of the Air Force and the Commander of the
United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the
appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the
findings and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander
under such analysis of alternatives, including the cost
evaluation of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation.
(b) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not
apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion
opportunities for the program of record specified in
subsection (a).
(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means the following:
(1) The congressional defense committees.
(2) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives.
(3) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 218. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PROTECTED
TACTICAL DEMONSTRATION AND PROTECTED MILITARY
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS TESTBED OF THE
ADVANCED EXTREMELY HIGH FREQUENCY PROGRAM.

(a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force,
for the protected tactical demonstration and protected
military satellite communications testbed of the advanced
extremely high frequency program, not more than 50 percent
may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the
program of record for such program until--
(1) the completion of the ongoing analysis of alternatives
for such program of record; and
(2) a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on
which the Secretary of the Air Force and the Commander of the
United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the
congressional defense committees a briefing on the findings
and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander under such
analysis of alternatives, including the cost evaluation of
the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
(b) Exception.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall not
apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion
opportunities for the program of record specified in
subsection (a).

Subtitle C--Other Matters

SEC. 221. REVISION TO THE SERVICE REQUIREMENT UNDER THE
SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND RESEARCH FOR
TRANSFORMATION DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM.

Subparagraph (B) of section 2192a(c)(1) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(B) in the case of a person not an employee of the
Department of Defense, the person shall enter into a written
agreement to accept and continue employment for the period of
obligated service determined under paragraph (2)--
``(i) with the Department of Defense; or
``(ii) with a public or private entity or organization
outside the Department if the Secretary of Defense determines
that employment of the

[[Page H4558]]

person with such entity or organization for the purpose of
such obligated service would provide a benefit to the
Department.''.

SEC. 222. REVISION OF REQUIREMENT FOR ACQUISITION PROGRAMS TO
MAINTAIN DEFENSE RESEARCH FACILITY RECORDS.

(a) Revision of Functions of Defense Research Facilities.--
Subsection (b) of section 2364 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (3), by adding ``and'' after the
semicolon;
(2) in paragraph (4)--
(A) by adding ``and issue'' between ``position'' and
``papers'';
(B) by striking ``combatant commands'' and inserting
``components of the Department of Defense''; and
(C) by striking ``; and'' and inserting a period; and
(3) by striking paragraph (5).
(b) Definitions.--Subsection (c) of such section is amended
to read as follows:
``(c) Defense Research Facility Defined.--In this section,
the term `defense research facility' means a Department of
Defense facility which performs or contracts for the
performance of--
``(1) basic research; or
``(2) applied research known as exploratory development.''.

SEC. 223. MODIFICATION TO COST-SHARING REQUIREMENT FOR PILOT
PROGRAM TO INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION
FEATURES DURING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF
CERTAIN DEFENSE SYSTEMS.

Section 243(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note)
is amended in the matter following paragraph (2) by striking
``at least one-half of the cost of such activities'' and
inserting ``an appropriate share of the cost of such
activities, as determined by the Secretary''.

TITLE III--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING.

Subtitle B--Energy and Environment

SEC. 311. ELIMINATION OF FISCAL YEAR LIMITATION ON
PROHIBITION OF PAYMENT OF FINES AND PENALTIES
FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION ACCOUNT,
DEFENSE.

Section 2703(f) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by striking ``for fiscal years 1995 through 2010,'';
and
(2) by striking ``for fiscal years 1997 through 2010''.

SEC. 312. BIANNUAL CERTIFICATION BY COMMANDERS OF THE
COMBATANT COMMANDS RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION
ON THE DISPOSAL OF WASTE IN OPEN-AIR BURN PITS.

Paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of section 317 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) is amended to read
as follows:
``(2) Compliance.--
``(A) Certification of compliance.--Except as provided
under subparagraph (B), the commander of each combatant
command that is engaged in a contingency operation shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
House of Representatives biannual certifications that covered
waste under the jurisdiction of the commander has not been
disposed of in violation of the regulations prescribed
pursuant to paragraph (1) during the period covered by the
certification.
``(B) Notice of noncompliance.--If a commander determines
that certification cannot be made under subparagraph (A)
because, with respect to covered waste under the jurisdiction
of the commander, no alternative disposal method was feasible
for an open-air burn pit pursuant to regulations prescribed
under paragraph (1), the commander shall notify the Secretary
of Defense of such determination and the Secretary shall--
``(i) not later than 30 days after such determination is
made, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and House of Representatives notice of such
determination, including the circumstances, reasoning, and
methodology that led to such determination; and
``(ii) after notice is given under clause (i), for each
subsequent 180-day-period during which covered waste is
disposed of in the open-air burn pit covered by such notice,
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
House of Representatives the justifications of the Secretary
for continuing to operate such open-air burn pit.''.

SEC. 313. EXCLUSIONS FROM DEFINITION OF ``CHEMICAL
SUBSTANCE'' UNDER TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT
AND REPORT ON LEAD AMMUNITION.

(a) In General.--Section 3(2)(B)(v) of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(v)) is amended by striking
``, and'' and inserting ``and any component of such an
article (including, without limitation, shot, bullets and
other projectiles, propellants when manufactured for or used
in such an article, and primers), and''.
(b) Assessment and Report.--Not later than September 30,
2015, the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the
Secretaries of the other military departments, shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a report containing
the results of an assessment conducted by the Secretary of
each of the following:
(1) The total costs associated with the procurement of non-
lead alternatives for small arms, broken down by type.
(2) The total costs associated with the qualification of
non-lead alternatives for small arms, broken down by type.
(3) An assessment of the extent to which non-lead variants
of ammunition exist for small arms, and to the extent such
variants exist, the extent to which such variants meet
service requirements and specifications.

SEC. 314. EXEMPTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FROM ALTERNATIVE
FUEL PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENT.

Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of
2007 (Public Law 110-140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by
adding at the end the following: ``This section shall not
apply to the Department of Defense.''.

SEC. 315. CONGRESSIONAL NOTICE OF BULK PURCHASE OF
ALTERNATIVE FUELS FOR OPERATIONAL USE.

Not later than 60 days before making a bulk purchase of
alternative fuels intended for operational use, the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees notice of the intent to make such a purchase. Such
notice shall include the total quantity of fuel, the cost,
and the type of funding intended to be used to make the
purchase.

SEC. 316. LIMITATION ON PROCUREMENT OF BIOFUELS.

(a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), none
of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be
used to purchase or produce biofuels until the earlier of the
following dates:
(1) The date on which the cost of the biofuel is equal to
the cost of conventional fuels purchased by the Department.
(2) The date on which the Budget Control Act of 2011
(Public Law 112-25), and the sequestration in effect by
reason of such Act, are no longer in effect.
(b) Exceptions.--The limitation under subsection (a) shall
not apply to biofuels purchased--
(1) in limited quantities necessary to complete test and
certification; or
(2) for the biofuel research and development efforts of the
Department.

SEC. 317. LIMITATION ON PLAN, DESIGN, REFURBISHING, OR
CONSTRUCTION OF BIOFUELS REFINERIES.

The Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for
the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a
biofuels refinery any other facility or infrastructure used
to refine biofuels unless such planning, design,
refurbishing, or construction is specifically authorized by
law.

Subtitle C--Logistics and Sustainment

SEC. 321. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT FOR STRATEGIC POLICY ON
PREPOSITIONING OF MATERIEL AND EQUIPMENT.

Section 2229(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by inserting ``support for crisis response
elements,'' after ``service requirements,''.

SEC. 322. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORTS ON DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE PREPOSITIONING STRATEGIC POLICY AND
PLAN FOR PREPOSITIONED STOCKS.

Subsection (c) of section 321 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66) is
amended to read as follows:
``(c) Comptroller General Reports.--
``(1) Initial report.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of
the United States shall review the implementation plan
submitted under subsection (b) and the prepositioning
strategic policy required under section 2229(a) of title 10,
United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), and submit
to the congressional defense committees a report describing
the findings of such review and including any additional
information relating to the prepositioning strategic policy
and plan that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.
``(2) Follow-up reports.--Following the submittal of the
initial report required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller
General shall conduct annual reviews, for each of the
subsequent three years, of the progress of the Department of
Defense in implementing the strategic policy and the
Department plan for prepositioned stocks, and submit to the
congressional defense committees a report containing an
assessment of such progress, including any additional
information related to the management of prepositioned stocks
that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.''.

SEC. 323. PILOT PROGRAM ON PROVISION OF LOGISTIC SUPPORT FOR
THE CONVEYANCE OF EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES TO
ALLIED FORCES.

(a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense may establish a
pilot program to provide logistic support for the conveyance
of excess defense articles to allied forces participating in
bilateral or multilateral training activities with the Armed
Forces of the United States.
(b) Limitation.--In carrying out the pilot program under
this section, the Secretary may only provide logistic
support--
(1) in accordance with the Arms Export Control Act and
other relevant export control laws of the United States;
(2) in accordance with section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j);
(3) in direct support of training activities--
(A) carried out in support of a contingency operation or a
noncombat operation (including an operation in support of the
provision of humanitarian or foreign disaster assistance, a
country stabilization operation, or a peacekeeping operation
under chapter VI or VII of the Charter of the United
Nations); or

[[Page H4559]]

(B) if the Secretary determines that the provision of such
support is in the best interest of the Armed Forces of the
Unites States.
(c) Limitation.--The total value of logistic support
provided under subsection (a)(1) in any fiscal year may not
exceed $10,000,000.
(d) Termination.--The authority to carry out the pilot
program under this section shall terminate on September 30,
2016.
(e) Report.--Not later than December 31 of each year during
which the Secretary carried out a pilot program under this
section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed
Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate
and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on
the pilot program under this section during the fiscal year
preceding the fiscal year during which the report is
submitted. Each such report shall contain each of the
following for the fiscal year covered by the report:
(1) Each nation for which logistic support was provided
under the pilot program.
(2) For each such nation, a description of the type and
value of logistic support, and the excess defense article or
articles conveyed.
(f) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``logistics support'' means--
(A) the use of military transportation and cargo-handling
assets, including aircraft;
(B) materiel support in the form of fuel, petroleum, oil,
or lubricants; and
(C) commercially contracted transportation.
(2) The term ``excess defense article'' has the meaning
given such term in section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j).

Subtitle D--Reports

SEC. 331. REPEAL OF ANNUAL REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
OPERATION AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR MILITARY
MUSEUMS.

(a) In General.--Section 489 of title 10, United States
Code, is repealed.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking
the item relating to section 489.

SEC. 332. REPORT ON ENDURING REQUIREMENTS AND ACTIVITIES
CURRENTLY FUNDED THROUGH AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED TO
BE APPROPRIATED FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY
OPERATIONS.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than the date of the
submission of the President's budget for a fiscal year under
section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year
2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report that includes each
of the following:
(1) A list of enduring mission requirements, equipping,
training, sustainment, and other operation and maintenance
activities of the military departments, combat support
agencies, and Department of Defense that are funded through
amounts authorized to be appropriated for overseas
contingency operations.
(2) The amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the
activities described in paragraph (1).
(3) The amounts provided in the budget for fiscal year 2015
submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a)
of title 31, United States Code.
(4) A three-year plan to migrate the requirements and
activities on the list described in paragraph (1) to be
funded other than through amounts authorized to be
appropriated for overseas contingency operations.
(b) Definition of Enduring.--For purposes of this section,
the term ``enduring'' means planned to continue to exist
beyond the last day of the period covered by the future-years
defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States
Code, in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 333. ARMY ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONALLY ALIGNED FORCE.

At the same time as the President transmits to Congress the
budget for fiscal 2016 year under section 1105 of title 31,
United States Code, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to
the congressional defense committees an assessment of how the
Army has--
(1) captured and incorporated lessons learned through the
initial employment of the regionally aligned force in the
United States Africa Command area of responsibility;
(2) institutionalized and improved predeployment training;
(3) improved the coordination of activities between special
operations forces, Army regionally aligned units, contractors
of the Department of State, contractors of the Department of
Defense, the geographic combatant commands, the Joint Staff,
and international partners;
(4) accounted for all the various funding streams used to
fund regionally aligned force activities, including the
amount of funds expended from each account;
(5) assessed the impacts associated with long-term
commitments of regionally aligned forces to meet security
cooperation requirements;
(6) maintained high levels of core mission readiness while
supporting geographic combatant commander requirements
through regionally aligned force activities;
(7) planned for expansion of the regionally aligned force
model; and
(8) planned to retain regional expertise within units
habitually aligned to a specific region.

SEC. 334. REPORT ON IMPACTS OF FUNDING REDUCTIONS ON MILITARY
READINESS.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 30 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller) shall report to the congressional defense
committees on the readiness and cost impacts, both immediate
and long-term, for the military services, the Office of the
Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the
Defense Agencies, of the reductions in funding required in
section 4301 of this Act. Such report shall address each of
the following categories:
(1) Reduction in contracts for Other Services, including--
(A) impacts on mission execution and effectiveness
(B) subsistence and support of persons, including submarine
galley maintenance in support of the Navy fleets;
(C) the credentialing of health, legal, engineering, and
acquisition professionals, including licenses,
certifications, and national board examinations;
(D) continuing education for military service members and
their families, including tuition assistance and completion
of graduate degrees, including correspondence courses;
(E) scholarships, instructor pay, and textbooks for Reserve
Officer Training Corps and Junior Reserve Officer Training
Corps programs;
(F) installation family support programs;
(G) general training, including training outside normal
occupational specialties such as cultural and language
training for deploying forces;
(H) physical fitness services;
(I) the annual audit of financial records and annual review
of acquisition programs;
(J) drivers for security details;
(K) foreign national indirect hires;
(L) port visit costs and port visit security;
(M) Defense Travel System afloat support;
(N) engineering readiness assessment teams;
(O) sexual assault and suicide prevention and response
programs;
(P) student meal programs and educational assistance
purchases;
(Q) employer support to the National Guard and Reserve;
(R) Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program; and
(S) network programming activities, database sustainment,
and improvement.
(2) Reductions in contracts for facility sustainment,
restoration, and modernization, including--
(A) impacts to mission execution and effectiveness;
(B) impacts to life, health and safety, including fire and
emergency services;
(C) impacts to training;
(D) deferrals of repairs or upgrades to mission-critical
infrastructure, including roads, electrical systems, heating
and air conditioning systems, and buildings;
(E) deferrals of repairs or upgrades to airfield runways,
taxiways and aprons;
(F) installation security through the deferrals of repairs,
replacements or reconfigurations of gates or other
installation security components;
(G) base operations due to deferral of facility
renovations, consolidations, conversions, or demolitions;
(H) operation of dining facilities;
(I) utility privatization;
(J) deferrals of repair and renovation of barracks;
(K) facilities engineering services;
(L) dredging of navigation channels;
(M) execution of the minimum six percent capital investment
program required under section 2476 of title 10, United
States Code; and
(N) maintenance, repairs, and modernization of Department
of Defense dependent schools in Europe and the Pacific and
defense domestic dependent elementary schools.
(3) Reductions in civilian personnel, including--
(A) mission execution and effectiveness;
(B) the ability to recruit, hire, and train civilian
employees;
(C) the cost of overtime that will be generated as a result
of unfilled civilian personnel billets;
(D) the morale of the civilian workforce; and
(E) the ability to execute reductions in force within the
fiscal year.
(4) Reductions in unobligated balances of prior-year
funding, including:
(A) mission execution and effectiveness; and
(B) the ability to execute reductions within the fiscal
year.
(5) Any other information that the Under Secretary
determines is relevant to enhancing the committees'
understanding of the impacts of the required reductions in
funding.
(b) Form of Report.--The Comptroller General may report to
the congressional defense committees, as required by
subsection (a), either by providing a briefing or a written
report.

Subtitle E--Limitations and Extensions of Authority

SEC. 341. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT
FOR THE SUSTAINMENT, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, OR
OVERHAUL OF THE F117 ENGINE.

The Secretary of the Air Force may not enter into a
contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or
overhaul of the F117 engine until the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies
to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of
the Air Force has structured the contract in such a way that
provides the Secretary of the Air Force the required insight
into all aspects of F117 system, subsystem, components, and
subcomponents regarding historical usage rates, cost, price,
expected and actual service-life, and supply chain management
data sufficient to determine that the Secretary of the Air
Force is paying a fair and reasonable price for F117
sustainment, maintenance, repair, and overhaul as compared to
the PW2000 commercial-derivative engine sustainment price for
sustainment, maintenance, repair, and overhaul in the private
sector. The Secretary may waive the limitation in the
preceding sentence to enter into a contract if the Secretary
determines that such a waiver is in the interest of national
security.

[[Page H4560]]

Subtitle F--Other Matters

SEC. 351. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY RELATING TO PROVISION OF
INSTALLATION-SUPPORT SERVICES THROUGH
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT AGREEMENTS.

(i) Transfer of Section 2336 to Chapter 159.--
(1) Transfer and redesignation.--Section 2336 of title 10,
United States Code, is transferred to chapter 159 of such
title, inserted after section 2678, and redesignated as
section 2679.
(2) Revised section heading.--The heading of such section,
as so transferred and redesignated, is amended to read as
follows:

``Sec. 2679. Installation-support services: intergovernmental
support agreements''.

(b) Clarifying Amendments.--Such section, as so transferred
and redesignated, is further amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``The Secretary
concerned'' and inserting ``Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the Secretary concerned''; and
(B) in paragraph (2)--
(i) by striking ``Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, an'' and inserting ``An'';
(ii) by striking subparagraph (A); and
(iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as
subparagraphs (A) and (B) respectively; and
(2) by adding at the end of subsection (e) the following
new paragraph:
``(4) The term `intergovernmental support agreement' means
a legal instrument reflecting a relationship between the
Secretary concerned and a State or local government that
contains such terms and conditions as the Secretary concerned
considers appropriate for the purposes of this section and
necessary to protect the interests of the United States.''.
(c) Clerical Amendments.--
(1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 137
of such title is amended by striking the item relating to
section 2336.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159
of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating
to section 2678 the following new item:

``2679. Installation-support Services: intergovernmental support
agreements.''.

SEC. 352. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ACCESS TO TRAINING RANGES
WITHIN UNITED STATES PACIFIC COMMAND AREA OF
RESPONSIBILITY.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Reliable access to military training ranges is an
essential component of military readiness.
(2) The training opportunities provided by military
training ranges are critical to maintaining the technical and
operational superiority of the Armed Forces.
(3) The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review states that the
operational readiness of the Armed Forces hinges on unimpeded
access to land, air, and sea training and test space.
(4) The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review states that United
States forces in the Asia-Pacific region ``will resume
regular bilateral and multilateral training exercises, pursue
increased training opportunities to improve capabilities and
capacity of partner nations, as well as support humanitarian,
disaster relief, counterterrorism, and other operations that
contribute to the stability of the region''.
(5) A number of critical military training ranges,
including the Pohakuloa Training Center in Hawaii, are
located within the United States Pacific Command area of
responsibility providing units from all the military
services, as well as allied and partner militaries with
realistic joint and combined arms training opportunities.
(6) Due to the ``tyranny of distance'' in the Asia-Pacific
region, there are significant challenges in transporting
equipment and personnel to the various military training
ranges within the United States Pacific Command area of
responsibility.
(7) The Department of Defense continues a number of efforts
aimed at preserving military training ranges, while also
minimizing the environmental effects of training activities.
(8) The Department of Defense has a variety of authorities
that may be used to mitigate encroachment on military testing
and training missions.
(b) Sense of Congress.--In light of the findings specified
in subsection (a), it is the sense of Congress that the
Secretary of Defense should--
(1) ensure that members of the Armed Forces continue to
have reliable access to military training ranges;
(2) optimize the use of multilateral, joint training
facilities overseas in order to increase readiness and
interoperability with allies and partners of the United
States;
(3) utilize a full range of assets, including both air- and
sea-based assets, including inactive Joint High Speed
Vessels, to improve accessibility to military training areas
within the United States Pacific Command area of
responsibility;
(4) provide stable budget authority for long-term
investments in range and test center infrastructure to lower
the cost of access to the ranges and training centers;
(5) take appropriate action to identify and leverage
existing authorities and programs, as well as work with State
and municipalities to leverage their authorities, to mitigate
encroachment or other challenges that have the potential to
impact future access or operations on military training
ranges;
(6) maximize the use of the United States Pacific Command
training ranges, including Pohakuloa Training Center in
Hawaii, by the military departments and increase the use of
such training ranges for bilateral and multilateral exercises
with regional allies and partners; and
(7) take appropriate action to leverage existing
authorities and programs, as well as work with local
governments to leverage their authorities, to address any
challenges that have the potential to impede future access to
or operations on military training ranges.

SEC. 353. MANAGEMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AMMUNITION INVENTORY.

(a) Consolidation of Data.--Not later than 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in
conjunction with the Secretaries of the Army, Air Force, and
Navy, shall issue Department-wide guidance and designate an
authoritative database on conventional ammunition. Not later
than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
Under Secretary shall notify the congressional defense
committees on what database has been designated under this
subsection.
(b) Annual Report.--The Secretary of the Army will include
in its annual ammunition inventory reports information on all
available ammunition for use during the redistribution
process, including ammunition that was unclaimed in a during
a year before the year during which the report is submitted
by another service and categorized for disposal.

TITLE IV--MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A--Active Forces

SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES.

The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty
personnel as of September 30, 2015, as follows:
(1) The Army, 490,000.
(2) The Navy, 323,600.
(3) The Marine Corps, 184,100.
(4) The Air Force, 311,220.

SEC. 402. REVISIONS IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH
MINIMUM LEVELS.

Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the
following new paragraphs:
``(1) For the Army, 490,000.
``(2) For the Navy, 323,600.
``(3) For the Marine Corps, 184,100.
``(4) For the Air Force, 310,900.''.

Subtitle B--Reserve Forces

SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE.

(a) In General.--The Armed Forces are authorized strengths
for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as
of September 30, 2015, as follows:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 350,200.
(2) The Army Reserve, 202,000.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 57,300.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,200.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,000.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 67,100.
(7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000.
(b) End Strength Reductions.--The end strengths prescribed
by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve
component shall be proportionately reduced by--
(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to
serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component
which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end
of the fiscal year; and
(2) the total number of individual members not in units
organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such
component who are on active duty (other than for training or
for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their
consent at the end of the fiscal year.
(c) End Strength Increases.--Whenever units or individual
members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are
released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end
strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected
Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased
proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such
units and by the total number of such individual members.

SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN
SUPPORT OF THE RESERVES.

Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the
reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of
September 30, 2015, the following number of Reserves to be
serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the
case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of
organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or
training the reserve components:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 31,385.
(2) The Army Reserve, 16,261.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 9,973.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,704.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,830.

SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL
STATUS).

The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as
of the last day of fiscal year 2015 for the reserve
components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding
section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the
following:
(1) For the Army National Guard of the United States,
27,210.
(2) For the Army Reserve, 7,895.
(3) For the Air National Guard of the United States,
21,792.
(4) For the Air Force Reserve, 9,789.

SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2015 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL
STATUS TECHNICIANS.

(a) Limitations.--

[[Page H4561]]

(1) National guard.--Within the limitation provided in
section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the
number of non-dual status technicians employed by the
National Guard as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed the
following:
(A) For the Army National Guard of the United States,
1,600.
(B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350.
(2) Army reserve.--The number of non-dual status
technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30,
2015, may not exceed 595.
(3) Air force reserve.--The number of non-dual status
technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September
30, 2015, may not exceed 90.
(b) Non-Dual Status Technicians Defined.--In this section,
the term ``non-dual status technician'' has the meaning given
that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States
Code.

SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED TO
BE ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT.

During fiscal year 2015, the maximum number of members of
the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving
at any time on full-time operational support duty under
section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the
following:
(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000.
(2) The Army Reserve, 13,000.
(3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200.
(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000.
(6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000.

Subtitle C--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the
use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of
the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise
provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the
funding table in section 4401.
(b) Construction of Authorization.--The authorization of
appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other
authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for
such purpose for fiscal year 2015.

TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

Subtitle A--Officer Personnel Policy Generally

SEC. 501. AUTHORITY TO LIMIT CONSIDERATION FOR EARLY
RETIREMENT BY SELECTIVE RETIREMENT BOARDS TO
PARTICULAR WARRANT OFFICER YEAR GROUPS AND
SPECIALTIES.

Section 581(d) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
(2) by designating the second sentence of paragraph (1) as
paragraph (2); and
(3) in paragraph (2), as so designated--
(A) by striking ``the list shall include each'' and
inserting ``the list shall include--
``(A) the name of each'';
(B) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``;
or''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(B) with respect to a group of warrant officers
designated under subparagraph (A) who are in a particular
grade and competitive category, only those warrant officers
in that grade and competitive category who are also in a
particular year group or specialty, or any combination
thereof determined by the Secretary.''.

SEC. 502. RELIEF FROM LIMITS ON PERCENTAGE OF OFFICERS WHO
MAY BE RECOMMENDED FOR DISCHARGE DURING A
FISCAL YEAR USING ENHANCED AUTHORITY FOR
SELECTIVE EARLY DISCHARGES.

Section 638a(d) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by striking paragraph (3); and
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs
(3) and (4), respectively.

SEC. 503. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS OF
ANNUAL REPORTS ON JOINT OFFICER MANAGEMENT AND
PROMOTION POLICY OBJECTIVES FOR JOINT OFFICERS.

(a) Repeal of Annual Reports.--
(1) Joint officer management.--Section 667 of title 10,
United States Code, is repealed.
(2) Promotion policy objectives for joint officers.--
Section 662 of such title is amended--
(A) by striking ``(a) Qualifications.--''; and
(B) by striking subsection (b).
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 38 of such title is amended by striking
the item relating to section 667.

SEC. 504. OPTIONS FOR PHASE II OF JOINT PROFESSIONAL MILITARY
EDUCATION.

Section 2154(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``consisting of a joint professional
military education curriculum'' and all that follows through
the period at the end and inserting the following:
``consisting of--
``(A) a joint professional military education curriculum
taught in residence at the Joint Forces Staff College or a
senior level service school that has been designated and
certified by the Secretary of Defense as a joint professional
military education institution; or
``(B) a senior level service course of at least ten months
that has been designated and certified by the Secretary of
Defense as a joint professional military education course.''.

SEC. 505. LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF ENLISTED AIDES AUTHORIZED
FOR OFFICERS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, AND
MARINE CORPS.

(a) Modification of Current Limitation.--Section 981 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the sum of (1)'' and
all that follows through the period at end of the subsection
and inserting the following: ``the sum of--
``(1) two times the number of officers serving on active
duty at the end of the preceding fiscal year in the grade of
general or admiral; and
``(2) the number of officers serving on active duty at the
end of the preceding fiscal year in the grade of lieutenant
general or vice admiral.''; and
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ``Not more than 300
enlisted members'' and inserting ``Not more than the lesser
of 300 enlisted members or the number of enlisted members
determined for a fiscal year under subsection (a)''.
(b) Annual Report.--Such section is further amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(c) Not later than March 1 of each year, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of
the Senate and the House of Representatives a report
specifying--
``(1) the total number of enlisted members assigned to duty
at any time during the previous fiscal year as enlisted aides
for officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps;
and
``(2) the number of authorized enlisted aides by each
general officer and flag officer position during the previous
fiscal year.''.

SEC. 506. REQUIRED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN ELEMENTS OF
COMMAND CLIMATE IN PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS OF
COMMANDING OFFICERS.

The Secretary of a military department shall ensure that
the performance appraisal of a commanding officer in an Armed
Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary indicates the
extent to which the commanding officer has or has not
established a command climate in which--
(1) allegations of sexual assault are properly managed and
fairly evaluated; and
(2) a victim of criminal activity, including sexual
assault, can report the criminal activity without fear of
retaliation, including ostracism and group pressure from
other members of the command.

Subtitle B--Reserve Component Personnel Management

SEC. 511. RETENTION ON THE RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST
FOLLOWING NONSELECTION FOR PROMOTION OF CERTAIN
HEALTH PROFESSIONS OFFICERS AND FIRST
LIEUTENANTS AND LIEUTENANTS (JUNIOR GRADE)
PURSUING BACCALAUREATE DEGREES.

(a) Retention of Certain First Lieutenants and Lieutenants
(Junior Grade) Following Nonselection for Promotion.--
Subsection (a)(1) of section 14701 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``A reserve officer of'' and inserting
``(A) A reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or
Marine Corps described in subparagraph (B) who is required to
be removed from the reserve active-status list under section
14504 of this title, or a reserve officer of'';
(2) by striking ``of this title may, subject to the needs
of the service and to section 14509 of this title,'' and
inserting ``of this title, may'';
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
``(B) A reserve officer covered by this subparagraph is a
reserve officer of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps who
holds the grade of first lieutenant, or a reserve officer of
the Navy who holds the grade of lieutenant (junior grade),
and who--
``(i) is a health professions officer; or
``(ii) is actively pursuing an undergraduate program of
education leading to a baccalaureate degree.
``(C) The consideration of a reserve officer for
continuation on the reserve active-status list pursuant to
this paragraph is subject to the needs of the service and to
section 14509 of this title.''.
(b) Retention of Health Professions Officers.--Such section
is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsection (b):
``(b) Continuation of Health Professions Officers.--(1)
Notwithstanding subsection (a)(6), a health professions
officer obligated to a period of service incurred under
section 16201 of this title who is required to be removed
from the reserve active-status list under section 14504,
14505, 14506, or 14507 of this title and who has not
completed a service obligation incurred under section 16201
of this title shall be retained on the reserve active-status
list until the completion of such service obligation and then
discharged, unless sooner retired or discharged under another
provision of law.
``(2) The Secretary concerned may waive the applicability
of paragraph (1) to any officer if the Secretary determines
that completion of the service obligation of that officer is
not in the best interest of the service.
``(3) A health professions officer who is continued on the
reserve active-status list under this subsection who is
subsequently promoted or whose name is on a list of officers
recommended for promotion to the next higher grade is not
required to be discharged or retired upon completion of the
officer's service obligation. Such officer may continue on
the reserve active-status list as other officers of the same
grade unless separated under another provision of law.''.

[[Page H4562]]

SEC. 512. CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU ROLE IN
ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECTORS AND DEPUTY DIRECTORS OF
THE ARMY AND AIR NATIONAL GUARDS.

(a) Recommendation by Chief of the National Guard Bureau.--
Paragraph (1) of section 10506(a) of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``selected by the
Secretary of the Army'' and inserting ``recommended by the
Chief of the National Guard Bureau, in consultation with the
Secretary of the Army,''; and
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``selected by the
Secretary of the Air Force'' and inserting ``recommended by
the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, in consultation with
the Secretary of the Air Force,''.
(b) Assistance to Chief of the National Guard Bureau.--
Paragraph (2) of such section is amended by striking ``The
officers so selected'' and inserting ``The Director and
Deputy Director, Army National Guard, and the Director and
Deputy Director, Air National Guard,''.
(c) Condition on Assignment and Conforming Amendments.--
Paragraph (3) of such section is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``The President'' and
inserting ``Consistent with paragraph (1), the President'';
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``the Secretary of the
military department concerned'' and inserting ``the Chief of
the National Guard Bureau as provided in paragraph (1)'';
(3) by striking subparagraph (D); and
(4) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (D).

SEC. 513. NATIONAL GUARD CIVIL AND DEFENSE SUPPORT ACTIVITIES
AND RELATED MATTERS.

(a) Operational Use of the National Guard.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 116. OPERATIONAL USE OF THE NATIONAL GUARD.

``(a) In General.--This section authorizes the operational
use of the National Guard and recognizes that the basic
premise of both the National Incident Management System and
the National Response Framework is that--
``(1) incidents are typically managed at the local level
first; and
``(2) local jurisdictions retain command, control, and
authority over response activities for their jurisdictional
areas.
``(b) Assistance to Civilian Firefighting Organizations.--
``(1) Assistance authorized.--Members and units of the
National Guard shall be authorized to support firefighting
operations, missions, or activities, including aerial
firefighting employment of the Modular Airborne Firefighting
System (MAFFS), undertaken in support of a civilian authority
or a State or Federal agency.
``(2) Role of governor and state adjutant general.--For the
purposes of paragraph (1)--
``(A) the Governor of a State shall be the principal
civilian authority; and
``(B) the adjutant general of the State shall be the
principal military authority, when acting in his or her State
capacity, and has the primary authority to mobilize members
and units of the National Guard of the State in any duty
status under this title the adjutant general deems
appropriate to employ necessary forces when funds to perform
such operations, missions, or activities are reimbursed.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:

``116. Operational use of the National Guard.''.

(b) Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) Support.--Section 328(b)
of title 32, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting ``duty as specified in section 116(b) of
this title or may perform'' after ``subsection (a) may
perform''; and
(2) by inserting ``(A) and (B)'' after `` specified in
section 502(f)(2)''.
(c) Federal Technicians Support.--Section 709(a)(3) of
title 32, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``duty
as specified in section 116(b) of this title or'' after ``(3)
the performance of''.

Subtitle C--General Service Authorities

SEC. 521. PROCEDURES FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MILITARY
PERSONNEL DECISIONS RELATING TO CORRECTION OF
MILITARY RECORDS.

(a) Availability of Judicial Review; Limitations.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 79 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:

``Sec. 1560. Judicial review of decisions relating to
correction of military records

``(a) Availability of Judicial Review.--
``(1) In general.--Pursuant to sections 1346 and 1491 of
title 28 and chapter 7 of title 5, any person adversely
affected by a records correction final decision may obtain
judicial review of the decision in a court with jurisdiction
to hear the matter.
``(2) Records correction final decision defined.--In this
section, the term `records correction final decision' means
any of the following decisions:
``(A) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned
pursuant to section 1552 of this title.
``(B) A final decision issued by the Secretary of a
military department or the Secretary of Homeland Security
pursuant to section 1034(g) of this title.
``(C) A final decision issued by the Secretary of Defense
pursuant to section 1034(h) of this title.
``(D) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned
pursuant to section 1554a of this title.
``(b) Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies.--
``(1) General rule.--Except as provided in paragraphs (3)
and (4), judicial review of a matter that could be subject to
correction under a provision of law specified in subsection
(a)(2) may not be obtained under this section or any other
provision of law unless--
``(A) the petitioner has requested a correction under
sections 1552 or 1554a of this title (including such a
request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this
title); and
``(B) the Secretary concerned has rendered a final decision
denying that correction in whole or in part.
``(2) Whistleblower cases.--When the final decision of the
Secretary concerned is subject to review by the Secretary of
Defense under section 1034(h) of this title, the petitioner
is not required to seek such review before obtaining judicial
review, but if the petitioner seeks such review, judicial
review may not be sought until the earlier of the following
occurs:
``(A) The Secretary of Defense makes a decision in the
matter.
``(B) The period specified in section 1034(h) of this title
for the Secretary to make a decision in the matter expires.
``(3) Class actions.--If judicial review of a records
correction final decision is sought, and the petitioner for
such judicial review also seeks to bring a class action with
respect to a matter for which the petitioner requested a
correction under section 1552 of this title (including a
request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title)
and the court issues an order certifying a class in the case,
paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to any member of the
certified class (other than the petitioner) with respect to
any matter covered by a claim for which the class is
certified.
``(4) Timeliness.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the
records correction final decision of the Secretary concerned
is not issued by the date that is 18 months after the date on
which the petitioner requests a correction.
``(c) Statutes of Limitation.--
``(1) Six years from final decision.--A records correction
final decision (other than in a matter to which paragraph (2)
applies) is not subject to judicial review under this section
or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition
for such review is filed in a court not later than six years
after the date of the records correction final decision.
``(2) Six years for certain claims that may result in
payment of money.--(A) In a case of a records correction
final decision described in subparagraph (B), the records
correction final decision (or the portion of such decision
described in such subparagraph) is not subject to judicial
review under this section or otherwise subject to review in
any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court
before the end of the six-year period that began on the date
of discharge, retirement, release from active duty, or death
while on active duty, of the person whose military records
are the subject of the correction request. Such period does
not include any time between the date of the filing of the
request for correction of military records leading to the
records correction final decision and the date of the final
decision.
``(B) Subparagraph (A) applies to a records correction
final decision or portion of the decision that involves a
denial of a claim that, if relief were to be granted by the
court, would support, or result in, the payment of money
either under a court order or under a subsequent
administrative determination, other than payments made
under--
``(i) chapter 61 of this title to a claimant who prior to
such records correction final decision, was not the subject
of a decision by a physical evaluation board or by any other
board authorized to grant disability payments to the
claimant; or
``(ii) chapter 73 of this title.
``(d) Habeas Corpus.--This section does not affect any
cause of action arising under chapter 153 of title 28.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the
following new item:

``1560. Judicial review of decisions.''.
(b) Effect of Denial of Request for Correction of Records
When Prohibited Personnel Action Alleged.--
(1) Notice of denial; procedures for judicial review.--
Subsection (g) of section 1034 of such title is amended by
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(7) In any case in which the final decision of the
Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part,
of any requested correction of the record of the member or
former member, the Secretary concerned shall provide the
member or former member--
``(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the
decision; and
``(B) a written notification of the availability of
judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of
this title and the time period for obtaining such review in
accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.''.
(2) Secretary of defense review; notice of denial.--
Subsection (h) of such section is amended--
(A) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Upon the completion of
all''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) The submittal of a matter to the Secretary of Defense
by the member or former member under paragraph (1) must be
made within 90 days of the receipt by the member or former
member of the final decision of the Secretary of the military
department concerned in the matter. In any case in which the
final decision of the Secretary of Defense results in denial,
in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the
record of the member or former member, the Secretary of
Defense shall provide the member or former member--

[[Page H4563]]

``(A) a concise written statement of the basis for the
decision; and
``(B) a written notification of the availability of
judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of
this title and the time period for obtaining such review in
accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.''.
(3) Sole basis for judicial review.--Such section is
further amended--
(A) by redesignating subsections (i) and (j) as subsections
(j) and (k), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new
subsection (i):
``(i) Judicial Review.--(1) A decision of the Secretary of
Defense under subsection (h) shall be subject to judicial
review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.
``(2) In a case in which review by the Secretary of Defense
under subsection (h) was not sought, a decision of the
Secretary of a military department under subsection (g) shall
be subject to judicial review only as provided in section
1560 of this title.
``(3) A decision by the Secretary of Homeland Security
under subsection (g) shall be subject to judicial review only
as provided in section 1560 of this title.''.
(c) Effect of Denial of Other Requests for Correction of
Military Records.--Section 1552 of such title is amended by
adding at the end the following new subsections:
``(h) In any case in which the final decision of the
Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part,
of any requested correction, the Secretary concerned shall
provide the claimant--
``(1) a concise written statement of the basis for the
decision; and
``(2) a written notification of the availability of
judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of
this title and the time period for obtaining such review in
accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.
``(i) A decision by the Secretary concerned under this
section shall be subject to judicial review only as provided
in section 1560 of this title.''.
(d) Judicial Review of Corrections Recommended by the
Physical Disability Board of Review.--Section 1554a of such
title is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (h); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new
subsections (f) and (g):
``(f) Record of Decision and Notification.--In any case in
which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results
in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction
of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary
shall provide to the member or former member--
``(1) a concise written statement of the basis for the
decision; and
``(2) a written notification of the availability of
judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of
this title and the time period for obtaining such review in
accordance with the applicable statute of limitations.
``(g) Judicial Review.--A decision by the Secretary
concerned under this section shall be subject to judicial
review only as provided in section 1560 of this title.''.
(e) Effective Date and Application.--
(1) In general.--The amendments made by this section shall
take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, and shall apply to all final decisions of the Secretary
of Defense under section 1034(h) of title 10, United States
Code, and of the Secretary of a military department and the
Secretary of Homeland Security under sections 1034(g), 1552,
or 1554a of such title rendered on or after such date.
(2) Treatment of existing cases.--This section and the
amendments made by this section do not affect the authority
of any court to exercise jurisdiction over any case that was
properly before the court before the effective date specified
in paragraph (1).
(f) Implementation.--The Secretary of the military
department concerned and, in the case of the Coast Guard, the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating may prescribe regulations, and interim guidance
before prescribing such regulations, to implement the
amendments made by this section. Regulations or interim
guidance prescribed by the Secretary of a military department
may not take effect until approved by the Secretary of
Defense.

SEC. 522. ADDITIONAL REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF TRANSITION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

(a) Information on Educational Assistance and Other
Available Benefits.--Section 1144 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e), as
subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new
subsection (c):
``(c) Additional Elements of Program.--The mandatory
program carried out by this section also shall include the
following:
``(1) For any such member who plans to use the member's
entitlement to educational assistance under title 38--
``(A) instruction providing an overview of the use of such
entitlement; and
``(B) courses of post-secondary education appropriate for
the member, courses of post-secondary education compatible
with the member's education goals, and instruction on how to
finance the member's post-secondary education.
``(2) Instruction in the benefits under laws administered
by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and in other subjects
determined to be appropriate by the Secretary concerned.''.
(b) Deadline for Implementation.--The program carried out
under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall
comply with the requirements of subsection (c) of such
section, as added by subsection (a), by not later than April
1, 2016.

SEC. 523. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT CAREER
FLEXIBILITY PROGRAMS.

(a) Duration of Program Authority.--Subsection (m) of
section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417;
10 U.S.C. prec. 701 note), as amended by section 531(a) of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1403) and redesignated by
section 522(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1722), is
amended by striking ``December 31, 2015'' and inserting
``December 31, 2019''.
(b) Conforming Amendments to Reporting Requirements.--
Subsection (k) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009, as amended by
section 531(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and 2017'' and
inserting ``, 2017, and 2019''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``March 1, 2019'' and
inserting ``March 1, 2020''.

SEC. 524. PROVISION OF INFORMATION TO MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES ON PRIVACY RIGHTS RELATING TO RECEIPT OF
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES.

(a) Provision of Information Required.--The Secretaries of
the military departments shall ensure that the information
described in subsection (b) is provided--
(1) to each officer candidate during initial training;
(2) to each recruit during basic training; and
(3) to other members of the Armed Forces at such times as
the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(b) Required Information.--The information required to be
provided under subsection (a) shall include information on
the applicability of Department of Defense Directive 6025.18
and other regulations regarding privacy prescribed pursuant
to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (Public Law 104-191) to records regarding a member of
the Armed Forces seeking and receiving mental health
services.

SEC. 525. PROTECTION OF THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OF MILITARY
CHAPLAINS TO CLOSE A PRAYER OUTSIDE OF A
RELIGIOUS SERVICE ACCORDING TO THE TRADITIONS,
EXPRESSIONS, AND RELIGIOUS EXERCISES OF THE
ENDORSING FAITH GROUP.

(a) United States Army.--Section 3547 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:
``(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
(b) United States Military Academy.--Section 4337 of such
title is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
(c) United States Navy and Marine Corps.--Section 6031 of
such title is amended by adding at the end the following new
subsection:
``(d) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
(d) United States Air Force.--Section 8547 of such title is
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.
(e) United States Air Force Academy.--Section 9337 of such
title is amended--
(1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``There''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a
religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to
close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions,
and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group.''.

SEC. 526. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SENIOR ADVISOR ON
PROFESSIONALISM.

(a) Initial Congressional Oversight.--In the development of
the roles, responsibilities, and goals of the Department of
Defense Senior Advisor on Professionalism to strengthen
professionalism programs in the Department of Defense, the
Secretary of Defense shall communicate with the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives
regarding the mission, goals, and metrics for the Senior
Advisor on Professionalism.
(b) Initial Review by Senior Advisor on Professionalism.--
Upon appointment of the Senior Advisor on Professionalism,
the Senior Advisor on Professionalism shall--
(1) conduct a preliminary review of the effectiveness of
current programs and controls of the Department of Defense
and the military departments regarding professionalism; and
(2) submit, not later than September 1, 2015, to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives recommendations to strengthen professionalism
programs in the Department of Defense.

SEC. 527. REMOVAL OF ARTIFICIAL BARRIERS TO THE SERVICE OF
WOMEN IN THE ARMED FORCES.

(a) Validation and Oversight of Gender-neutral Occupational
Standards.--
(1) Validation; purpose.--The Secretary of Defense shall
direct the Secretary of each military department to validate
the gender-neutral

[[Page H4564]]

occupational standards used by the Armed Forces under the
jurisdiction of that Secretary for the purpose of ensuring
that the standards--
(A) are consistent with section 543 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103-160;
10 U.S.C. 113 note), as amended by section 523 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 756), which requires gender-
neutral occupational standards, requiring performance
outcome-based standards for the successful accomplishment of
the necessary and required specific tasks associated with the
qualifications and duties performed;
(B) accurately predict performance of actual, regular, and
recurring duties of a military occupation; and
(C) are applied equitably to measure individual
capabilities.
(2) Role of independent research entity.--To comply with
paragraph (1), the Secretaries of the military departments
shall work with an independent research entity identified by
the Secretaries.
(b) Infantry Training Courses.--Not later than 60 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
the Navy shall provide the Committees on Armed Services of
the Senate and the House of Representatives with a briefing
on the Marine Corps research involving female members of the
Marine Corps who volunteer for the Infantry Officers Course
(IOC), the enlisted infantry training course (ITB), and the
Ground Combat Element Experimental Task-Force (GCEXTF) for
the purpose of--
(1) determining what metrics the Marine Corps used to
develop the research requirements and elements for the Marine
Corps Expanded Entry-Level Training Research;
(2) indicating what is being evaluated during these
research studies, along with how long both research studies
will last; and
(3) identifying how data gathered during the research
studies will be used to open infantry and other closed
occupations.
(c) Female Personal Protection Gear.--The Secretary of
Defense shall direct each Secretary of a military department
to take immediate steps to ensure that properly designed and
fitted combat equipment is available and distributed to
female members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of
that Secretary.
(d) Review of Outreach and Recruitment Efforts Focused on
Officers.--
(1) Review required.--The Comptroller General of United
States shall conduct a review of Services' Outreach and
Recruitment Efforts gauged toward women representation in the
officer corps.
(2) Elements of review.--In conducting the review under
this subsection, the Comptroller General shall--
(A) identify and evaluate current initiatives the Armed
Forces are using to increase accession of women into the
officer corps;
(B) identify new recruiting efforts to increase accessions
of women into the officer corps specifically at the military
service academies, Officer Candidate Schools, Officer
Training Schools, the Academy of Military Science, and
Reserve Officer Training Corps; and
(C) identify efforts, resources, and funding required to
increase military service academy accessions by women by an
additional 20 percent.
(3) Submission of results.--Not later than April 1, 2015,
the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report
containing the results of the review under this subsection.

Subtitle D--Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault and Domestic
Violence Prevention and Response

SEC. 531. IMPROVED DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INFORMATION
REPORTING AND COLLECTION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
INCIDENTS INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES.

(a) Data Reporting and Collection Improvements.--Not later
than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive
management plan to address deficiencies in the reporting of
information on incidents of domestic violence involving
members of the Armed Forces for inclusion in the Department
of Defense database on domestic violence incidents required
by section 1562 of title 10, United States Code, to ensure
that the database provides an accurate count of domestic
violence incidents and any consequent disciplinary action.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 543(a) of the Ike
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 1562 note) is amended by
striking paragraph (1).

SEC. 532. ADDITIONAL DUTY FOR JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PANEL
REGARDING USE OF MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS BY
DEFENSE DURING PRELIMINARY HEARING AND COURT-
MARTIAL PROCEEDINGS.

(a) Review Required.--The independent panel established by
the Secretary of Defense under section 576(a)(2) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the ``judicial
proceedings panel'', shall conduct a review and assessment
of--
(1) the impact of the use of mental health records by the
defense during the preliminary hearing conducted under
section 832 of title 10, United States Code (article 32 of
the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and during court-
martial proceedings; and
(2) the use of mental health records in civilian criminal
legal proceedings in order to identify any significant
discrepancies between the two legal systems.
(b) Submission of Results.--The judicial proceedings panel
shall include the results of the review and assessment in one
of the reports required by section 576(c)(2)(B) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.

SEC. 533. APPLICABILITY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND
RESPONSE AND RELATED MILITARY JUSTICE
ENHANCEMENTS TO MILITARY SERVICE ACADEMIES.

The Secretary of the military department concerned and, in
the case of the Coast Guard Academy, the Secretary of the
Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall ensure
that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 950), including amendments made by that title,
apply to the United States Military Academy, the Naval
Academy, the Air Force Academy, and the Coast Guard Academy.

SEC. 534. CONSULTATION WITH VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT
REGARDING VICTIMS' PREFERENCE FOR PROSECUTION
OF OFFENSE BY COURT-MARTIAL OR CIVILIAN COURT.

(a) Legal Consultation Between Special Victims' Counsel and
Victim of Sexual Assault.--Subsection (b) of section 1044e of
title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (6), (7), (8), and (9) as
paragraphs (7), (8), (9), and (10), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new
paragraph (6):
``(6) Legal consultation regarding the advantages and
disadvantages of prosecution of the alleged sex-related
offense by court-martial or by a civilian court with
jurisdiction over the offense before the victim expresses a
preference as to the prosecution authority pursuant to the
process required by subsection (e)(3).''.
(b) Process to Discern Victim Preference.--Subsection (e)
of such section is amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
``(3) The Secretary concerned shall establish a process to
ensure consultation with a victim of an alleged sex-related
offense that occurs in the United States to discern the
victim's preference regarding prosecution authority,
regardless of whether the report of that offense is
restricted or unrestricted.''.

SEC. 535. ENFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS RELATED TO
PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY CERTAIN MILITARY RULES
OF EVIDENCE.

Section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of
the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding
at the end the following new subsection:
``(e) Enforcement by Court of Criminal Appeals.--(1) If the
victim of an offense under this chapter believes that a
court-martial ruling violates the victim's rights afforded by
a Military Rule of Evidence specified in paragraph (2), the
victim may petition the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ
of mandamus to require the court-martial to comply with the
Military Rule of Evidence. The Court of Criminal Appeals may
issue the writ on the order of a single judge and shall take
up and decide the petition within 72 hours after the petition
has been filed.
``(2) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to the protections
afforded by the following:
``(A) Military Rule of Evidence 513, relating to the
psychotherapist-patient privilege.
``(B) Military Rule of Evidence 412, relating to the
admission of evidence regarding a victim's sexual background.
``(3) Court-martial proceedings may not be stayed or
subject to a continuance of more than five days for purposes
of enforcing this subsection. If the Court of Criminal
Appeals denies the relief sought, the reasons for the denial
shall be clearly stated on the record in a written
opinion.''.

SEC. 536. MINIMUM CONFINEMENT PERIOD REQUIRED FOR CONVICTION
OF CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES COMMITTED BY
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

(a) Mandatory Punishments.--Section 856(b)(1) of title 10,
United States Code (article 56(b)(1) of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice) is amended by striking ``at a minimum'' and
all that follows through the period at the end of the
paragraph and inserting the following: ``at a minimum except
as provided for in section 860 of this title (article 60)--
``(A) dismissal or dishonorable discharge; and
``(B) confinement for two years.''.
(b) Effective Date.--Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of
section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)
of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by
subsection (a), shall apply to offenses specified in
paragraph (2) of such section committed on or after the date
that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 537. MODIFICATION OF MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE RELATING
TO ADMISSIBILITY OF GENERAL MILITARY CHARACTER
TOWARD PROBABILITY OF INNOCENCE.

(a) Modification Generally.--The Secretary of Defense shall
modify the Military Rules of Evidence to clarify that the
general military character of an accused is not admissible
for the purpose of showing the probability of innocence of
the accused, except when evidence of a trait of the military
character of an accused is relevant to an element of an
offense for which the accused has been charged.
(b) Revision of Rule 404(a) by Operation of Law.--Effective
on and after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule
404(a) of the Military Rules of Evidence does not authorize
the admissibility of evidence regarding the good military
character of an accused in the findings phase of courts-
martial, except in the instance of the following military-
specific offenses:
(1) Article 84 effecting unlawful enlistment, appointment,
separation.
(2) Article 85 desertion.
(3) Article 86 absent without leave.
(4) Article 87 missing movement.
(5) Article 88 contempt towards officials.

[[Page H4565]]

(6) Article 89 disrespect toward superior commissioned
officer.
(7) Article 90 assaulting, willfully disobeying superior
commissioned officer.
(8) Article 91 insubordinate conduct toward warrant,
noncommissioned, petty officer.
(9) Article 92 failure to obey order or regulation.
(10) Article 93 cruelty and maltreatment of subordinates.
(11) Article 94 mutiny and sedition.
(12) Article 95 resisting apprehension, flight, breach of
arrest, escape.
(13) Article 96 releasing a prisoner without proper
authority.
(14) Article 97 unlawful detention.
(15) Article 98 noncompliance with procedural rules.
(16) Article 99 misbehavior before enemy.
(17) Article 100 subordinate compelling surrender.
(18) Article 101 improper use of countersign.
(19) Article 102 forcing safeguard.
(20) Article 103 captured, abandoned property.
(21) Article 104 aiding the enemy.
(22) Article 105 misconduct as prisoner.
(23) Article 106a espionage.
(24) Article 107 false official statements.
(25) Article 108 loss, damage, destruction, disposition of
military property.
(26) Article 109 loss, damage, destruction, disposition of
property other than military property of the United States.
(27) Article 110 improper hazarding of vessel.
(28) Article 111 drunk or reckless operation of vehicle,
aircraft, or vessel.
(29) Article 112 wrongful use, possession, manufacture or
introduction of controlled substance.
(30) Article 113 misbehavior of sentinel or lookout.
(31) Article 114 dueling.
(32) Article 115 malingering.
(33) Article 116 riot.
(34) Article 117 provoking, speech, gestures.
(35) Article 133 conduct unbecoming an officer.
(36) Article 134 general article of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice.
(37) Attempts, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit such
offenses.

SEC. 538. CONFIDENTIAL REVIEW OF CHARACTERIZATION OF TERMS OF
DISCHARGE OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO
ARE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL OFFENSES.

(a) Confidential Appeal Process Through Boards for
Correction of Military Records.--The Secretaries of the
military departments shall each establish a confidential
process by which an individual who was the victim of a sex-
related offense during service in the Armed Forces may
appeal, through boards for the correction of military records
of the military department concerned, the terms or
characterization of the discharge or separation of the
individual from the Armed Forces on the grounds that the
terms or characterization were adversely affected by the
individual being the victim of such an offense.
(b) Consideration of Individual Experiences in Connection
With Offenses.--In deciding whether to modify the terms or
characterization of an individual's discharge or separation
pursuant to the process required by subsection (a), the
Secretary of the military department concerned shall instruct
boards for the correction of military records to give due
consideration to--
(1) the psychological and physical aspects of the
individual's experience in connection with the sex-related
offense; and
(2) what bearing such experience may have had on the
circumstances surrounding the individual's discharge or
separation from the Armed Forces.
(c) Preservation of Confidentiality.--Documents considered
and decisions rendered pursuant to the process required by
subsection (a) shall not be made available to the public,
except with the consent of the individual concerned.
(d) Sex-related Offense Defined.--In this section, the term
``sex-related offense'' means any of the following:
(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of
section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of
the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of title 10, United
States Code (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice).
(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph
(1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of title 10,
United States Code (article 80 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice).

SEC. 539. CONSISTENT APPLICATION OF RULES OF PRIVILEGE
AFFORDED UNDER THE MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE.

(a) Elimination of Exception to Psychotherapist-patient
Privilege.--Effective on and after the date of the enactment
of this Act, the exception granted by subparagraph (d)(8) of
Military Rule of Evidence 513 to the privilege afforded to
the patient of a psychotherapist to refuse to disclose, and
to prevent any other person from disclosing, a confidential
communication made between the patient and a psychotherapist
or an assistant to the psychotherapist in a case arising
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice shall be deemed to
no longer apply or exist as a matter of law.
(b) Conforming Amendment Required.--As soon as practicable
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Joint
Service Committee on Military Justice of the Department of
Defense shall amend Military Rule of Evidence 513 to reflect
the elimination of the exception referred to in subsection
(a) pursuant to such subsection.

Subtitle E--Military Family Readiness

SEC. 545. EARLIER DETERMINATION OF DEPENDENT STATUS WITH
RESPECT TO TRANSITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR
DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS SEPARATED FOR DEPENDENT
ABUSE.

Section 1059(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``as of the date on which the individual
described in subsection (b) is separated from active duty''
and inserting ``as of the date on which the separation action
is initiated by a commander of the individual described in
subsection (b)''.

SEC. 546. IMPROVED CONSISTENCY IN DATA COLLECTION AND
REPORTING IN ARMED FORCES SUICIDE PREVENTION
EFFORTS.

(a) Policy for Standard Suicide Data Collection, Reporting,
and Assessment.--The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a
policy for the development of a standard method for
collecting, reporting, and assessing suicide data and
suicide-attempt data involving members of the Armed Forces,
including reserve components thereof, and their dependents in
order to improve the consistency and comprehensiveness of--
(1) the suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to
section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239. 10 U.S.C. 1071 note);
and
(2) the suicide prevention and resilience program for the
National Guard and Reserves established pursuant to section
10219 of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Submission of Policy and Congressional Briefing.--Not
later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit the policy
developed under subsection (a) to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. At
the request of the committees, the Secretary also shall brief
such committees on the policy and the implementation status
of the standardized suicide data collection, reporting and
assessment method.
(c) Consultation and Implementation.--In the case of the
suicide prevention and resilience program for the National
Guard and Reserves--
(1) the Secretary of Defense shall develop the policy
required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Chief of
the National Guard Bureau; and
(2) the adjutants general of the States, the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the
Virgin Islands shall implement the policy within 180 days
after the date of the submission of the policy under
subsection (b).
(d) Dependent Defined.--In this section, the term
``dependent'', with respect to a member of the Armed Forces,
means a person described in section 1072(2) of title 10,
United States Code, except that, in the case of a parent or
parent-in-law of the member, the income requirements of
subparagraph (E) of such section do not apply.

SEC. 547. PROTECTION OF CHILD CUSTODY ARRANGEMENTS FOR
PARENTS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

(a) Child Custody Protection.--Title II of the
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.)
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 208. CHILD CUSTODY PROTECTION.

``(a) Restriction on Temporary Custody Order.--If a court
renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a
child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment
of a parent who is a servicemember, then the court shall
require that, upon the return of the servicemember from
deployment, the custody order that was in effect immediately
preceding the temporary order shall be reinstated, unless the
court finds that such a reinstatement is not in the best
interest of the child, except that any such finding shall be
subject to subsection (b).
``(b) Limitation on Consideration of Member's Deployment in
Determination of Child's Best Interest.--If a motion or a
petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the
custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may
consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of
deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole
factor in determining the best interest of the child.
``(c) No Federal Jurisdiction or Right of Action or
Removal.--Nothing in this section shall create a Federal
right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal
jurisdiction or create a right of removal.
``(d) Preemption.--In any case where State law applicable
to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as
contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of
protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying
servicemember than the rights provided under this section
with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court
shall apply the higher State standard.
``(e) Deployment Defined.--In this section, the term
`deployment' means the movement or mobilization of a
servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60
days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or
permanent official orders--
``(1) that are designated as unaccompanied;
``(2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or
``(3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family
members to that location.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section
1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items
relating to title II the following new item:

``208. Child custody protection.''.

Subtitle F--Education and Training Opportunities

SEC. 551. AUTHORIZED DURATION OF FOREIGN AND CULTURAL
EXCHANGE ACTIVITIES AT MILITARY SERVICE
ACADEMIES.

(a) United States Military Academy.--Section 4345a(a) of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``two
weeks'' and inserting ``four weeks''.

[[Page H4566]]

(b) Naval Academy.--Section 6957b(a) of such title is
amended by striking ``two weeks'' and inserting ``four
weeks''.
(c) Air Force Academy.--Section 9345a(a) of such title is
amended by striking ``two weeks'' and inserting ``four
weeks''.

SEC. 552. PILOT PROGRAM TO ASSIST MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES
IN OBTAINING POST-SERVICE EMPLOYMENT.

(a) Program Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
conduct the program described in subsection (c) to enhance
the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job
placement assistance and related employment services to
eligible members of the Armed Forces described in subsection
(b) for the purposes of--
(1) assisting such members in obtaining post-service
employment; and
(2) reducing the amount of ``Unemployment Compensation for
Ex-Servicemembers'' that the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is
operating pays into the Unemployment Trust Fund.
(b) Eligible Members.--Employment services provided under
the program are limited to members of the Armed Forces,
including members of the reserve components, who are being
separated from the Armed Forces or released from active duty.
(c) Evaluation of Use of Civilian Employment Staffing
Agencies.--
(1) Program described.--The Secretary of Defense shall
execute a program to evaluate the feasibility and cost-
effectiveness of utilizing the services of civilian
employment staffing agencies to assist eligible members of
the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment.
(2) Program management.--The program required by this
subsection shall be managed by an civilian organization (in
this section referred to as the ``program manager'') whose
principal members have experience--
(A) administering pay-for-performance programs; and
(B) within the employment staffing industry.
(3) Exclusion.--The program manager may not be a staffing
agency.
(d) Eligible Civilian Employment Staffing Agencies.--The
Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the program
manager shall establish the eligibility requirements to be
used by the program manager for the selection of civilian
employment staffing agencies to participate in the program.
(e) Payment of Staffing Agency Fees.--To encourage
employers to employ an eligible member of the Armed Forces
under the program, the program manager shall pay a
participating civilian employment staffing agency a portion
of its agency fee (not to exceed 50 percent above the
member's hourly wage). Payment of the agency fee will only be
made after the member has been employed and paid by the
private sector and the hours worked have been verified by the
program manager. The staffing agency shall be paid on a
weekly basis only for hours the member worked, but not to
exceed a total of 800 hours.
(f) Oversight Requirements.--In conducting the program, the
Secretary of Defense shall establish--
(1) program monitoring standards; and
(2) reporting requirements, including the hourly wage for
each eligible member of the Armed Forces obtaining employment
under the program, the numbers of hours worked during the
month, and the number of members who remained employed with
the same employer after completing the first 800 hours of
employment.
(g) Limitation on Total Program Obligations.--The total
amount obligated by the Secretary of Defense for the program
may not exceed $35,000,000 during a fiscal year.
(h) Reporting Requirements.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than January 15, 2019, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report describing the results of
the program, particularly whether the program achieved the
purposes specified in subsection (a).
(2) Comparison with other programs.--The report shall
include a comparison of the results of the program conducted
under this section and the results of other employment
assistant programs utilized by the Department of Defense. The
comparison shall include the number of members of the Armed
Forces obtaining employment through each program and the cost
to the Department per member.
(3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means the congressional defense committees, the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the Senate.
(i) Duration of Authority.--The authority of the Secretary
of Defense to carry out programs under this section expires
on September 30, 2018.

Subtitle G--Defense Dependents' Education

SEC. 561. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL
EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF
MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES.

(a) Assistance to Schools With Significant Numbers of
Military Dependent Students.--Of the amount authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and
available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide
activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301,
$25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of
providing assistance to local educational agencies under
subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109-163;
20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b) Local Educational Agency Defined.--In this section, the
term ``local educational agency'' has the meaning given that
term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

SEC. 562. AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY NON-UNITED STATES CITIZENS AS
TEACHERS IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OVERSEAS
DEPENDENTS' SCHOOL SYSTEM.

Section 2(2)(A) of the Defense Department Overseas Teachers
Pay and Personnel Practices Act (20 U.S.C. 901(2)(A)) is
amended by inserting before the comma at the end the
following: ``or, in the case of a teaching position that
involves instruction in the host-nation language, a local
national when a citizen of the United States is not
reasonably available to provide such instruction''.

SEC. 563. EXPANSION OF FUNCTIONS OF THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON
DEPENDENTS' EDUCATION TO INCLUDE DOMESTIC
DEPENDENT ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS.

(a) Expansion of Functions.--Subsection (c) of section 1411
of the Defense Dependents' Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C.
929) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``, and of the domestic
dependent elementary and secondary school system established
under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code,'' after
``of the defense dependents' education system''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and in the domestic
dependent elementary and secondary school system'' before the
comma at the end.
(b) Membership of Council.--Subsection (a)(1)(B) of such
section is amended--
(1) by inserting ``and the domestic dependent elementary
and secondary schools established under section 2164 of title
10, United States Code'' after ``the defense dependents'
education system''; and
(2) by inserting ``either'' before ``such system''.

SEC. 564. SUPPORT FOR EFFORTS TO IMPROVE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
AND TRANSITION OF MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS.

The Secretary of Defense may make grants to nonprofit
organizations that provide services to improve the academic
achievement of military dependent students, including those
nonprofit organizations whose programs focus on improving the
civic responsibility of military dependent students and their
understanding of the Federal Government through direct
exposure to the operations of the Federal Government.

SEC. 565. AMENDMENTS TO THE IMPACT AID IMPROVEMENT ACT OF
2012.

Section 563(c) of National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1748; 20
U.S.C. 6301 note) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) by striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``4-year''; and
(B) by inserting before the period at the end the
following, ``, except that amendment made by subsection (b)
to subparagraph (B) of section 8002(b)(3) of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(b)(3)(B))
shall be effective for a 2-year period beginning on the date
of enactment of this Act''; and
(2) in paragraph (4)--
(A) by striking ``The amendments'' and inserting the
following:
``(A) In general.--The amendments'';
(B) by inserting ``and subparagraph (B) of this paragraph''
after ``subsection (b)'';
(C) by striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``4-year'';
(D) by inserting ``and such subparagraph'' after ``such
subsection'' each place it appears; and
(E) by adding at the end the following:
``(B) Special rule.--For the period beginning January 3,
2015, and ending January 2, 2017, subparagraph (B) of section
8002(b)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(b)(3)(B)) is amended to read as follows:
`` `(B) Special rule.--In the case of Federal property
eligible under this section that is within the boundaries of
two or more local educational agencies that are eligible
under this section, any of such agencies may ask the
Secretary to calculate (and the Secretary shall calculate)
the taxable value of the eligible Federal property that is
within its boundaries by--
`` `(i) first calculating the per-acre value of the
eligible Federal property separately for each eligible local
educational agency that shares the Federal property, as
provided in subparagraph (A)(ii);
`` `(ii) then averaging the resulting per-acre values of
the eligible Federal property from each eligible local
educational agency that shares the Federal property; and
`` `(iii) then applying the average per-acre value to
determine the total taxable value of the eligible Federal
property under subparagraph (A)(iii) for the requesting local
educational agency.'.''.

Subtitle H--Decorations and Awards

SEC. 571. MEDALS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND CIVILIAN
EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WHO WERE
KILLED OR WOUNDED IN AN ATTACK INSPIRED OR
MOTIVATED BY A FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION.

(a) Purple Heart.--
(1) Award.--
(A) In general.--Chapter 57 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 1129 the
following new section:

``Sec. 1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in
attacks inspired or motivated by foreign terrorist
organizations

``(a) In General.--For purposes of the award of the Purple
Heart, the Secretary concerned shall treat a member of the
armed forces described in subsection (b) in the same manner
as

[[Page H4567]]

a member who is killed or wounded as a result of an
international terrorist attack against the United States.
``(b) Covered Members.--A member described in this
subsection is a member on active duty who was killed or
wounded in an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign
terrorist organization in circumstances where the death or
wound is the result of an attack targeted on the member due
to such member's status as a member of the armed forces,
unless the death or wound is the result of willful misconduct
of the member.
``(c) Foreign Terrorist Organization Defined.--In this
section, the term `foreign terrorist organization' means an
entity designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the
Secretary of State pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).''.
(B) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 1129 the following new
item:

``1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks inspired or
motivated by foreign terrorist organizations.''.

(2) Retroactive effective date and application.--
(A) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1)
shall take effect as of September 11, 2001.
(B) Review of certain previous incidents.--The Secretaries
concerned shall undertake a review of each death or wounding
of a member of the Armed Forces that occurred between
September 11, 2001, and the date of the enactment of this Act
under circumstances that could qualify as being the result of
an attack described in section 1129a of title 10, United
States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), to determine whether
the death or wounding qualifies as a death or wounding
resulting an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign
terrorist organization for purposes of the award of the
Purple Heart pursuant to such section (as so added).
(C) Actions following review.--If the death or wounding of
a member of the Armed Forces reviewed under subparagraph (B)
is determined to qualify as a death or wounding resulting
from an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist
organization as described in section 1129a of title 10,
United States Code (as so added), the Secretary concerned
shall take appropriate action under such section to award the
Purple Heart to the member.
(D) Secretary concerned defined.--In this paragraph, the
term ``Secretary concerned'' has the meaning given that term
in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of
Freedom.--
(1) Review of the november 5, 2009, attack at fort hood,
texas.--If the Secretary concerned determines, after a review
under subsection (a)(2)(B) regarding the attack that occurred
at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, that the death or
wounding of any member of the Armed Forces in that attack
qualified as a death or wounding resulting from an attack
inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist organization as
described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code
(as added by subsection (a)), the Secretary of Defense shall
make a determination as to whether the death or wounding of
any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or
civilian contractor in the same attack meets the eligibility
criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for
the Defense of Freedom.
(2) Award.--If the Secretary of Defense determines under
paragraph (1) that the death or wounding of any civilian
employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor
in the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November
5, 2009, meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the
Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom, the
Secretary shall take appropriate action to award the
Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom to the
employee or contractor.

SEC. 572. RETROACTIVE AWARD OF ARMY COMBAT ACTION BADGE.

(a) Authority To Award.--The Secretary of the Army may
award the Army Combat Action Badge (established by order of
the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, Department of
the Army Letter 600-05-1, dated June 3, 2005) to a person
who, while a member of the Army, participated in combat
during which the person personally engaged, or was personally
engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period beginning
on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001 (the
date of the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity
for the award of such decoration), if the Secretary
determines that the person has not been previously recognized
in an appropriate manner for such participation.
(b) Procurement of Badge.--The Secretary of the Army may
make arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action
Badge so that eligible recipients of the Army Combat Action
Badge pursuant to subsection (a) may procure the badge
directly from suppliers, thereby eliminating or at least
substantially reducing administrative costs for the Army to
carry out this section.

SEC. 573. REPORT ON NAVY REVIEW, FINDINGS, AND ACTIONS
PERTAINING TO MEDAL OF HONOR NOMINATION OF
MARINE CORPS SERGEANT RAFAEL PERALTA.

Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of
Representatives a report describing the Navy review,
findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor
nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. The
report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard
to the case.

Subtitle I--Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements

SEC. 581. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REVIEW AND REPORT ON
PREVENTION OF SUICIDE AMONG MEMBERS OF UNITED
STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES.

(a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense, acting
through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and
Readiness and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special
Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, shall conduct a review
of Department of Defense efforts regarding the prevention of
suicide among members of United States Special Operations
Forces and their dependents.
(b) Consultation.--In conducting the review under
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with,
and consider the recommendations of, the Office of Suicide
Prevention, the Secretaries of the military departments, the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low
Intensity Conflict, and the United States Special Operations
Command regarding the feasibility of implementing, for
members of United States Special Operations Forces and their
dependents, particular elements of the Department of Defense
suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to section 533
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (Public Law 112-81; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) and section 582
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (Public Law 112-239. 10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
(c) Elements of Review.--The review conducted under
subsection (a) shall specifically include an assessment of
each of the following:
(1) Current Armed Forces and United States Special
Operations Command policy guidelines on the prevention of
suicide among members of United States Special Operations
Forces and their dependents.
(2) Current and direct Armed Forces and United States
Special Operations Command suicide prevention programs and
activities for members of United States Special Operations
Forces and their dependents, including programs provided by
the Defense Health Program and the Office of Suicide
Prevention and programs supporting family members.
(3) Current Armed Forces and United States Special
Operations Command strategies to reduce suicides among
members of United States Special Operations Forces and their
dependents, including the cost of such strategies across the
future years defense program.
(4) Current Armed Forces and United States Special
Operations Command standards of care for suicide prevention
among members of United States Special Operations Forces and
their dependents, including training standards for behavioral
health care providers to ensure that such providers receive
training on clinical best practices and evidence-based
treatments as information on such practices and treatments
becomes available.
(5) The integration of mental health screenings and suicide
risk and prevention efforts for members of United States
Special Operations Forces and their dependents into the
delivery of primary care for such members and dependents.
(6) The standards for responding to attempted or completed
suicides among members of United States Special Operations
Forces and their dependents, including guidance and training
to assist commanders in addressing incidents of attempted or
completed suicide within their units.
(7) The standards regarding data collection for individual
members of United States Special Operations Forces and their
dependents, including related factors such as domestic
violence and child abuse.
(8) The means to ensure the protection of privacy of
members of United States Special Operations Forces and their
dependents who seek or receive treatment related to suicide
prevention.
(9) The need to differentiate members of United States
Special Operations Forces and their dependents from members
of conventional forces and their dependents in the
development and delivery of the Department of Defense suicide
prevention program.
(10) Such other matters as the Secretary of Defense
considers appropriate in connection with the prevention of
suicide among members of United States Special Operations
Forces and their dependents.
(d) Submission of Report.--Not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing
the results of the review conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 582. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
REVIEW OF SEPARATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES WHO MADE UNRESTRICTED REPORTS OF SEXUAL
ASSAULT.

(a) Review Required.--The Inspector General of the
Department of Defense shall conduct a review--
(1) to identify all members of the Armed Forces who, since
January 1, 2002, were separated from the Armed Forces after
making an unrestricted report of sexual assault;
(2) to determine the circumstances of and grounds for each
such separation, including--
(A) whether the separation was in retaliation for or
influenced by the identified member making an unrestricted
report of sexual assault; and
(B) whether the identified member requested an appeal; and
(3) if an identified member was separated on the grounds of
having a personality or adjustment disorder, to determine
whether the separation was carried out in compliance with
Department of Defense Instruction 1332.14 and any

[[Page H4568]]

other applicable Department of Defense regulations,
directives, and policies.
(b) Submission of Results and Recommendations.--Not later
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives the results of the review
conducted under subsection (a), including such
recommendations as the Inspector General of the Department of
Defense considers necessary.

SEC. 583. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT REGARDING MANAGEMENT OF
PERSONNEL RECORDS OF MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL
GUARD.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2015, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report regarding the management of
personnel records of members of the National Guard.
(b) Elements of Report.--In preparing the report under
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall consider, at a
minimum, the following:
(1) The appropriate Federal role and responsibility in the
management of the records of National Guard members.
(2) The extent to which selected States have digitized the
records of National Guard members.
(3) The extent to which those States and Federal agencies
have entered into agreements to share the digitized records.
(4) The extent to which Federal agencies face any
constraints in their ability to effectively manage National
Guard records.

SEC. 584. STUDY ON GENDER INTEGRATION IN DEFENSE OPERATION
PLANNING AND EXECUTION.

(a) Study Required.--Not later than 30 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff shall conduct a study concerning the
integration of gender into the planning and execution of
foreign operations of the Armed Forces at all levels.
(b) Elements of Study.--In conducting the study under
subsection (a), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
shall--
(1) identify those elements of defense doctrine, if any,
that should be revised to address attention to women and
gender;
(2) evaluate the need for a gender advisor training
program, including the length of training, proposed
curriculum, and location of training;
(3) determine how to best equip military leadership to
integrate attention to women and gender across all lines of
effort;
(4) determine the extent to which personnel qualified to
advise on women and gender are available within the
Department of Defense, including development of a billet
description for gender advisors; and
(5) evaluate where to assign gender advisors within
operational commands from the strategic to tactical levels,
with particular attention paid to assigning advisors to
combatant commanders and service chiefs.
(c) Submission of Results.--Not later than 270 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report containing the results of the
study conducted under subsection (a). The report shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.

SEC. 585. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF REPORT CONTAINING
RESULTS OF REVIEW OF OFFICE OF DIVERSITY
MANAGEMENT AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ROLE IN SEXUAL
HARASSMENT CASES.

Not later than June 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and
the House of Representatives a report containing the results
of the review conducted pursuant to section 1735 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 976).

Subtitle J--Other Matters

SEC. 591. INSPECTION OF OUTPATIENT RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES
OCCUPIED BY RECOVERING SERVICE MEMBERS.

Section 1662(a) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of
Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by
striking ``inspected on a semiannual basis for the first two
years after the enactment of this Act and annually
thereafter'' and inserting ``inspected at least once every
two years''.

SEC. 592. WORKING GROUP ON INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION
SYSTEM.

(a) Establishment.--There is established within the
Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint
Executive Committee under section 320 of title 38, United
States Code, a Working Group (in this section referred to as
the ``Working Group'') to evaluate and reform the Integrated
Disability Evaluation System of the Department of Defense and
the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Working Group shall
be established under the Disability Evaluation System Working
Group of the Joint Executive Committee.
(b) Pilot Program.--
(1) In general.--The Working Group shall carry out a pilot
program that will co-locate the services and personnel of the
Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs
to create an integrated model that continues the improvement
of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System process
through--
(A) increased process efficiencies, as determined by the
Working Group;
(B) the creation of a standardized form set described in
subsection (c)(3);
(C) the elimination of redundancies;
(D) the improvement of existing process timelines of the
Integrated Disability Evaluation System;
(E) increased service member satisfaction; and
(F) the establishment of an information technology bridging
solution described in subsection (c)(4).
(2) Duration.--The pilot program under paragraph (1) shall
be carried for a period not exceeding three years.
(c) Goals of Pilot Program.--In carrying out the pilot
program under subsection (b), the Working Group shall ensure
the following:
(1) The period beginning on the date on which an eligible
member begins to participate in the pilot program and ending
on the date on which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
determines the disability rating of the member is not more
than 295 days.
(2) Employees of the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs who carry out the pilot
program are co-located in the same facility, to the extent
practicable, to determine the efficiencies provided by
locating services of the Departments in the same location.
(3) The elimination of redundant forms by creating and
using a standardized electronic form set with respect to
information that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs both require for an eligible member
participating in the pilot program.
(4) The establishment of an information technology bridging
solution between the existing E-benefits program and the
MYIDES dashboard to ensure that both such programs contain
the information that is added to the claim of an eligible
member participating in the pilot program.
(5) Using the solution established under paragraph (4),
eligible members participating in the pilot program are able
to use the existing identification number of the member used
by the Department of Defense to--
(A) automatically track the status of the claim of the
member, including with respect to the office of the
Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs
that is responsible for the evaluation as of the date of
accessing such solution; and
(B) be informed of the estimated timeline of the evaluation
of the claim.
(6) Using the solution established under paragraph (4), the
Working Group and the Secretaries may--
(A) identify the office and employee of the Department of
Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs who are
responsible for the evaluation of a claim at any given time;
and
(B) track individual employees of the Department of Defense
and the Department of Veterans Affairs with respect to
statistics measuring quality and accuracy at the case level.
(7) Eligible members who participate in the pilot program
have the opportunity to use an exit survey (approved by the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs)
that informs the Working Group of the satisfaction of the
member with respect to the pilot program.
(d) Eligible Members.--A member of the Armed Forces who is
being separated or retired from the Armed Forces for
disability under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code,
is eligible to participate in the pilot program under
subsection (b) if--
(1) the member is referred to the Integrated Disability
Evaluation System beginning on or after the date of the
commencement of the pilot program by the specific medical
authority of a military department; and
(2) the evaluation of the member under the Integrated
Disability Evaluation System is processed at the disability
rating activity site in Providence, Rhode Island.
(e) Timeline.--By not later than 120 days after the date of
the first meeting of the Working Group, the Working Group
shall--
(1) establish the pilot program under subsection (b); and
(2) establish standards for the products, software,
personnel, approved standardized electronic form set
described in subsection (c)(3), and other matters required to
carry out the pilot program; and
(3) identify the security required for the information
systems of the pilot program.
(f) Location.--The pilot program established under
subsection (b) shall be located at Walter Reed National
Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.
(g) Cooperation.--
(1) Assignment.--The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs shall assign employees of both
Departments to the location specified in subsection (f)
during the period in which the pilot program is carried out.
(2) Prioritization.--As determined appropriate by the
Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint
Executive Committee, employees of the Veterans Benefits
Administration who rate claims for disability may be assigned
to the pilot program under subsection (b) in a sufficient
number to ensure that claims for disability that are approved
are processed--
(A) for proposed rating decision not later than 15 days
after such approval; and
(B) for notification of benefits and authorization of award
not later than 30 days after separation from the Armed
Forces.
(h) Treatment in Current IDES.--If an eligible member who
is participating in the pilot program under subsection (b)
elects to instead participate in the Integrated Disability
Evaluation System, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs shall evaluate the eligible member under
the Integrated Disability Evaluation System by recognizing
the date of the original claim of the member and without any
penalty with respect to the priority of the member in such
system.
(i) Reports.--
(1) Quarterly reports.--During each 90-day period during
the period in which the Working

[[Page H4569]]

Group carries out the pilot program under subsection (b), the
Working Group shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Department of Veterans
Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee a
report on the status of the pilot program. The report shall
include--
(A) the average number of days that an eligible member
participates in the pilot program before the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs determines the disability rating of the
member;
(B) the extent to which forms have been eliminated pursuant
to subsection (c)(3);
(C) the extent to which the information technology bridging
solution established pursuant to subsection (c)(4) has
improved information sharing between the Departments;
(D) the results of exit surveys described in subsection
(c)(7);
(E) the extent to which employees of the Department of
Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs have been co-
located in the same facility under the pilot program; and
(F) the determination of the Working Group, based on data
collected during the course of the pilot program, with
respect to the feasibility of increasing the efficiency of
the program to decrease the number of days of the goal
described in subsection (c)(1).
(2) Submission of quarterly reports.--Not later than 30
days after the date on which the Working Group submits a
report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the
appropriate congressional committees such report.
(3) Final report.--Not later than 180 days after the date
on which the pilot program under subsection (b) is completed,
the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary of Defense,
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Department of
Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive
Committee a report on the pilot program, including an
analysis of the pilot program and any recommendations
regarding whether the pilot program should be expanded.
(4) Submission of final report.--Not later than 30 days
after the date on which the Working Group submits the report
under paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the
appropriate congressional committees such report.
(j) Membership.--
(1) Number and appointment.--The Working Group shall be
composed of 15 members appointed by the Department of
Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive
Committee from among individuals who have subject matter
expertise or other relevant experience in government, the
private sector, or academia regarding--
(A) health care;
(B) medical records;
(C) logistics;
(D) information technology; or
(E) other relevant subjects.
(2) Disqualification.--An individual may not be appointed
to the Working Group if the individual has served on the
Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint
Executive Committee or any working group thereof.
(3) Employees of departments.--Not more than a total of
four individuals who are employed by either the Department of
Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs may be
appointed to the Working Group to ensure that the
efficiencies and best practices of the pilot program do not
violate the policies of the Departments. Such an individual
who is appointed may not serve as chairman of the Working
Group or serve in any other supervisory or leadership role.
(4) Advisors.--The Working Group shall seek advice from
experts from nongovernmental organizations (including
veterans service organizations, survivors of members of the
Armed Forces or veterans, and military organizations), the
Internet technology industry, private sector hospital
administrators, and other entities the Working Group
determines appropriate.
(5) Chairman.--Except as provided by paragraph (3), the
Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint
Executive Committee shall designate a member of the Working
Group to serve as chairman of the Working Group.
(6) Period of appointment.--Members of the Working Group
shall be appointed for the life of the Working Group. A
vacancy shall not affect its powers.
(7) Vacancy.--A vacancy on the Working Group shall be
filled in the manner in which the original appointment was
made.
(8) Appointment deadline.--The appointment of members of
the Working Group established in this section shall be made
not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act.
(9) Compensation of members.--Each member of the Working
Group who is not an officer or employee of the United States
shall be compensated at a rate equal to the daily equivalent
of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level IV of
the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United
States Code, for each day (including travel time) during
which the member is engaged in the performance of the duties
of the Working Group. All members of the Working Group who
are officers or employees of the United States shall serve
without compensation in addition to that received for their
services as officers or employees of the United States.
(k) Meetings.--
(1) Initial meeting.--The Working Group shall hold its
first meeting not later than 15 days after the date on which
a majority of the members are appointed.
(2) Minimum number of meetings.--The Working Group shall
meet not less than twice each year regarding the pilot
program under subsection (b), including the progress, status,
implementation, and execution of the pilot program.
(l) Termination of Working Group.--The Working Group shall
terminate on the date on which the Working Group submits the
report under subsection (i)(3).
(m) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means
the following:
(A) The Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the House of
Representatives and the Senate.
(B) The Committees on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives and the Senate.
(2) The term ``Integrated Disability Evaluation System''
means the disability evaluation system used jointly by the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

SEC. 593. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING FULFILLING PROMISE TO
LEAVE NO MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES UNACCOUNTED
IN AFGHANISTAN.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The United States is a country of great honor and
integrity.
(2) The United States has made a sacred promise to members
of the Armed Forces deployed overseas in defense of the
United States that their sacrifice and service will never be
forgotten.
(3) The United States can never thank the proud members of
the Armed Forces enough for their sacrifice and service on
behalf of the United States.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) abandoning the search efforts for members of the Armed
Forces who are missing or captured in the line of duty now or
in the future is unacceptable;
(2) the United States has a responsibility to keep the
promises made to members of the Armed Forces deployed
overseas in defense of the United States, including the
promise of the United States Soldier's Creed and the Warrior
Ethos, which state that ``I will never leave a fallen
comrade''; and
(3) while the United States continues to transition
leadership roles in combat operations in Afghanistan to the
people of Afghanistan, the United States must continue to
fulfill these important promises to any member of the Armed
Forces who is in a missing status or captured as a result of
service in Afghanistan now or in the future.

TITLE VI--COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

Subtitle A--Pay and Allowances

SEC. 601. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY
INCREASE IN RATES OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR
HOUSING UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.

Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting
``December 31, 2015''.

SEC. 602. NO FISCAL YEAR 2015 INCREASE IN BASIC PAY FOR
GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS.

Section 203(a)(2) of title 37, United States Code, shall be
applied for rates of basic pay payable for commissioned
officers in the uniformed services in pay grades O-7 through
O-10 during calendar year 2015 by using the rate of pay for
level II of the Executive Schedule in effect during 2014.

Subtitle B--Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays

SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY
AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting
``December 31, 2015'':
(1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve
reenlistment bonus.
(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve
affiliation or enlistment bonus.
(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted
members assigned to certain high-priority units.
(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve
enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment
and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve
enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior
service.
(7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel
expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal
commuting distance.
(8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments
for reserve component members experiencing extended and
frequent mobilization for active duty service.

SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL PAY
AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS.

(a) Title 10 Authorities.--The following sections of title
10, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December
31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015'':
(1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer
candidate accession program.
(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education
loans for certain health professionals who serve in the
Selected Reserve.
(b) Title 37 Authorities.--The following sections of title
37, United States Code, are amended by striking ``December
31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015'':
(1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention
bonuses for psychologists.
(2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for
registered nurses.
(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay
for nurse anesthetists.
(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected
Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime
specialties.

[[Page H4570]]

(5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for
dental officers.
(6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for
pharmacy officers.
(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for
medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.
(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental
specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS
AUTHORITIES FOR NUCLEAR OFFICERS.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting
``December 31, 2015'':
(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-
qualified officers extending period of active service.
(2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession
bonus.
(3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual
incentive bonus.

SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE
37 CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND
BONUS AUTHORITIES.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting
``December 31, 2015'':
(1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for
enlisted members.
(2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for
officers.
(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive
pay authorities for nuclear officers.
(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive
pay and bonus authorities for officers.
(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive
pay authorities for officers in health professions.
(6) Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for
cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve
Officers' Training Corps.
(7) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay.
(8) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special
duty pay.
(9) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or
proficiency bonus.
(10) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for
members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to
high priority units.

SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO
PAYMENT OF OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL
PAYS.

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are
amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting
``December 31, 2015'':
(1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention
bonus.
(2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay.
(3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for
active members.
(4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus.
(5) Section 316a(g), relating to incentive pay for members
of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language
proficiency.
(6) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new
officers in critical skills.
(7) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for
conversion to military occupational specialty to ease
personnel shortage.
(8) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for
transfer between branches of the Armed Forces.
(9) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer
candidates.

Subtitle C--Travel and Transportation

SEC. 621. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS FOR THE PROVISION
OF RELOCATION SERVICES.

The Secretary of Defense may authorize the commander of a
military base to enter into a contract with an appropriate
entity for the provision of relocation services to members of
the Armed Forces.

Subtitle D--Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality
Benefits and Operations

SEC. 631. AUTHORITY OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES
TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS WITH OTHER FEDERAL
AGENCIES AND INSTRUMENTALITIES TO PROVIDE AND
OBTAIN CERTAIN GOODS AND SERVICES.

Section 2492 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking ``Federal department, agency, or instrumentality''
and all that follows through the period at the end of the
section and inserting the following: ``Federal department,
agency, or instrumentality--
``(1) to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to
the efficient management and operation of the exchange system
or that morale, welfare, and recreation system; or
``(2) to provide or obtain food services beneficial to the
efficient management and operation of the dining facilities
on military installations offering food services to members
of the armed forces.''.

SEC. 632. REVIEW OF MANAGEMENT, FOOD, AND PRICING OPTIONS FOR
DEFENSE COMMISSARY SYSTEM.

(a) Review Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
conduct a review, utilizing the services of an independent
organization experienced in grocery retail analysis, of the
defense commissary system to determine the qualitative and
quantitative effects of--
(1) using variable pricing in commissary stores to reduce
the expenditure of appropriated funds to operate the defense
commissary system;
(2) implementing a program to make available more private
label products in commissary stores;
(3) converting the defense commissary system to a
nonappropriated fund instrumentality, and
(4) eliminating or at least reducing second-destination
funding.
(b) Additional Elements of Review.--The review required by
this section also shall consider the following:
(1) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense
commissary system on commissary patrons, in particular junior
enlisted members and junior officers and their dependents,
that would result from displacing current value and name-
brand products with private-label products.
(2) The sensitivity of commissary patrons to pricing
changes.
(3) The feasibility of generating net revenue from pricing
and stock assortment changes.
(4) The relationship of higher prices and reduced patron
savings to patron usage and accompanying sales, both on a
national and regional basis.
(5) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense
commissary system on industry support; such as vendor
stocking, promotions, discounts, and merchandising activities
and programs.
(6) The ability of the current commissary management and
information technology systems to accommodate changes to the
existing pricing and management structure.
(7) The product category management systems and expertise
of the Defense Commissary Agency.
(8) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense
commissary system on military exchanges and other morale,
welfare, and recreation programs for members of the Armed
Forces.
(9) The identification of management and legislative
changes that would be required in connection with changes to
the defense commissary system.
(10) An estimate of the time required to implement
recommended changes to the current pricing and management
model of the defense commissary system.
(c) Submission.--Not later than February 1, 2015, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a
report containing the results of the review required by this
section.

SEC. 633. RESTRICTION ON IMPLEMENTING ANY NEW DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE POLICY TO LIMIT, RESTRICT, OR BAN THE
SALE OF CERTAIN ITEMS ON MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS.

The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the
military departments may not take any action to implement any
new policy that would limit, restrict, or ban the sale of any
legal consumer product category sold as of January 1, 2014,
in the defense commissary system or exchange stores system on
any military installation, domestically or overseas, or on
any Department of Defense vessel at sea.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

SEC. 641. ANONYMOUS SURVEY OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES
REGARDING THEIR PREFERENCES FOR MILITARY PAY
AND BENEFITS.

(a) Survey Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall carry
out a anonymous survey of random members of the Armed Forces
regarding military pay and benefits for the purpose of
soliciting information on the following:
(1) The value that members of the Armed Forces place on the
following forms of compensation relative to one another:
(A) Basic pay.
(B) Allowances for housing and subsistence.
(C) Bonuses and special pays.
(D) Dependent healthcare benefits.
(E) Healthcare benefits for retirees under 65 years old.
(F) Healthcare benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees.
(G) Retirement pay.
(2) How the members value different levels of pay or
benefits, including the impact of co-payments or deductibles
on the value of benefits.
(3) Any other issues related to military pay and benefits
as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(4) How information collected pursuant to a previous
paragraph varies by age, rank, dependent status, and such
other factors as the Secretary of Defense considers
appropriate.
(b) Submission of Results.--Not later than March 1, 2015,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress and make
publicly available a report containing the results of the
survey, including both the analyses and the raw data
collected.

TITLE VII--HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits

SEC. 701. MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED
FORCES.

(a) In General.--Section 1074m of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) by redesignating subparagraph (B) and (C) as
subparagraph (C) and (D), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
``(B) Once during each 180-day period during which a member
is deployed.''; and
(2) in subsection (c)(1)(A)--
(A) in clause (i), by striking ``; and'' and inserting a
semicolon;
(B) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
(C) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
``(ii) by personnel in deployed units whose
responsibilities include providing unit health care services
if such personnel are available and the use of such personnel
for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such
personnel to perform higher priority tasks; and''.

[[Page H4571]]

(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1074m(a)(2) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by striking ``subparagraph (B)
and (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (C) and (D)''.

SEC. 702. CLARIFICATION OF PROVISION OF FOOD TO FORMER
MEMBERS AND DEPENDENTS NOT RECEIVING INPATIENT
CARE IN MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES.

Section 1078b of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``A member'' each place it appears and
inserting ``A member or former member''; and
(2) in subsection (a)(2)(C), by striking ``member or
dependent'' and inserting ``member, former member, or
dependent''.

Subtitle B--Health Care Administration

SEC. 711. COOPERATIVE HEALTH CARE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE
MILITARY DEPARTMENTS AND NON-MILITARY HEALTH
CARE ENTITIES.

Section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act of
2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Secretary of Defense''
and inserting ``Secretary concerned'';
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) by striking ``Secretary shall'' and inserting
``Secretary concerned shall'';
(B) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``if the Secretary
establishing such agreement is the Secretary of Defense''
before the semicolon; and
(C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or the military
department concerned'' after ``the Department of Defense'';
and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(e) Secretary Concerned Defined.--In this section, the
term `Secretary concerned' means--
``(1) the Secretary of a military department; or
``(2) the Secretary of Defense.''.

SEC. 712. SURVEYS ON CONTINUED VIABILITY OF TRICARE STANDARD
AND TRICARE EXTRA.

Section 711(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended in the
matter preceding subparagraph (A)--
(1) by striking ``on a biennial basis''; and
(2) by striking ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting the
following: ``paragraph (1) during 2017 and 2020, and at such
others times as requested by such committees or as the
Comptroller General determines appropriate''.

SEC. 713. LIMITATION ON TRANSFER OR ELIMINATION OF GRADUATE
MEDICAL EDUCATION BILLETS.

The Secretary of Defense may not transfer or eliminate a
graduate medical education billet from the military medical
treatment facility to which the billet is assigned as of the
date of the enactment of this Act unless the Secretary--
(1) conducts a Department-wide review of the implementation
of the plan required by section 731 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
10 U.S.C. 1071 note) that is based on not less than two years
of carrying out such implementation;
(2) conducts an examination of the most successful
incentives for recruiting and retaining medical professionals
to participate in the graduate medical education programs of
the military departments;
(3) determines the assignment of such billets based on the
review and examination conducted under paragraphs (1) and
(2), respectively; and
(4) after the Secretary makes the determination under
paragraph (3), certifies to the congressional defense
committees that any proposed transfer or elimination of such
billets--
(A) meets the needs of the military departments and the
patient population; and
(B) takes into account the assignment interests of the
members of the Armed Forces who are participating (or who
will participate) in the graduate medical education programs
of the military departments.

SEC. 714. REVIEW OF MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM MODERNIZATION
STUDY.

(a) Limitation.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may not
restructure or realign a military medical treatment facility
until a 120-day period has elapsed following the date on
which the Comptroller General of the United States is
required to submit to the congressional defense committees
the report under subsection (b)(3).
(2) Report.--The Secretary shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report that includes the
following:
(A) During the period from 2001 to 2012, for each military
medical treatment facility considered under the modernization
study directed by the Resource Management Decision of the
Department of Defense numbered MP-D-01--
(i) the average daily inpatient census;
(ii) the average inpatient capacity;
(iii) the top five inpatient admission diagnoses;
(iv) each medical specialty available;
(v) the average daily percent of staffing available for
each medical specialty;
(vi) the beneficiary population within the catchment area;
(vii) the budgeted funding level;
(viii) whether the facility has a helipad capable of
receiving medical evacuation airlift patients arriving on the
primary evacuation aircraft platform for the military
installation served;
(ix) a determination of whether the civilian hospital
system in which the facility resides is a Federally-
designated underserved medical community and the effect on
such community from any reduction in staff or functions or
downgrade of the facility;
(x) if the facility serves a training center, a
determination, made in consultation with the appropriate
training directorate, training and doctrine command, and
forces command of each military department, of the risk with
respect to high tempo, live-fire military operations, and the
potential for a mass casualty event if the facility is
downgraded to a clinic or reduced in personnel or
capabilities;
(xi) a site assessment by TRICARE to assess the network
capabilities of TRICARE providers in the local area;
(xii) the inpatient mental health availability; and
(xiii) the average annual inpatient care directed to
civilian medical facilities.
(B) For each military medical treatment facility considered
under such modernization study--
(i) the civilian capacity by medical specialty in each
catchment area;
(ii) the distance in miles to the nearest civilian
emergency care department;
(iii) the distance in miles to the closest civilian
inpatient hospital, listed by level of care and whether the
facility is designated a sole community hospital;
(iv) the availability of ambulance service on the military
installation and the distance in miles to the nearest
civilian ambulance service, including the average response
time to the military installation;
(v) an estimate of the cost to restructure or realign the
military medical treatment facility, including with respect
to bed closures and civilian personnel reductions; and
(vi) if the military medical treatment facility is
restructured or realigned, an estimate of--

(I) the number of civilian personnel reductions, listed by
series;
(II) the number of local support contracts terminated; and
(III) the increased cost of purchased care.

(C) The results of the study with respect to the
recommendations of the Secretary to restructure or realign
military medical treatment facilities.
(b) Comptroller General Review.--
(1) Review.--The Comptroller General of the United States
shall review the report under subsection (a)(2).
(2) Elements.--The review under paragraph (1) shall include
the following:
(A) An assessment of the methodology used by the Secretary
of Defense in conducting the study.
(B) An assessment of the adequacy of the data used by the
Secretary with respect to such study.
(3) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date on
which the Secretary submits the report under subsection
(a)(2), the Comptroller General shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the review under
paragraph (1).

Subtitle C--Reports and Other Matters

SEC. 721. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR JOINT DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL
FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND.

Section 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2573) is
amended by striking ``September 30, 2015'' and inserting
``September 30, 2016''.

SEC. 722. DESIGNATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SENIOR MEDICAL
ADVISOR FOR ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME.

(a) Designation of Senior Medical Advisor.--Subsection (a)
of section 1513A of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of
1991 (24 U.S.C. 413a) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Deputy Director of the
TRICARE Management Activity'' and inserting ``Deputy Director
of the Defense Health Agency''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Deputy Director of the
TRICARE Management Activity'' both places it appears and
inserting ``Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency''.
(b) Clarification of Responsibilities and Duties of Senior
Medical Advisor.--Subsection (c)(2) of such section is
amended by striking ``health care standards of the Department
of Veterans Affairs'' and inserting ``nationally recognized
health care standards and requirements''.

SEC. 723. RESEARCH REGARDING ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE.

The Secretary of Defense may carry out research,
development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to
Alzheimer's disease.

SEC. 724. ACQUISITION STRATEGY FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
STAFFING SERVICES.

(a) Acquisition Strategy.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop and
carry out an acquisition strategy with respect to entering
into contracts for the services of health care professional
staff at military medical treatment facilities.
(2) Elements.--The acquisition strategy under paragraph (1)
shall include the following:
(A) Identification of the responsibilities of the military
departments and elements of the Department of Defense in
carrying out such strategy.
(B) Methods to analyze, using reliable and detailed data
covering the entire Department, the amount of funds expended
on contracts for the services of health care professional
staff.
(C) Methods to identify opportunities to consolidate
requirements for such services and reduce cost.
(D) Methods to measure cost savings that are realized by
using such contracts instead of purchased care.
(E) Metrics to determine the effectiveness of such
strategy.
(b) Report.--Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the status of implementing the acquisition strategy under
paragraph (1) of subsection (a), including how each element
under subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (2) of such
subsection are being carried out.

[[Page H4572]]

SEC. 725. PILOT PROGRAM ON MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT
UNDER TRICARE PROGRAM.

(a) Establishment.--In accordance with section 1092 of
title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall
carry out a pilot program to evaluate the feasibility and
desirability of including medication therapy management as
part of the TRICARE program.
(b) Elements of Pilot Program.--In carrying out the pilot
program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure the
following:
(1) Patients who participate in the pilot program are
patients who--
(A) have more than one chronic condition; and
(B) are prescribed more than one medication.
(2) Medication therapy management services provided under
the pilot program are focused on improving patient use and
outcomes of prescription medications.
(3) The design of the pilot considers best commercial
practices in providing medication therapy management
services, including practices under the prescription drug
program under part D of title XVIII of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-101 et seq.).
(4) The pilot program includes methods to measure the
effect of medication therapy management services on--
(A) patient use and outcomes of prescription medications;
and
(B) the costs of health care.
(c) Locations.--
(1) Selection.--The Secretary shall carry out the pilot
program under subsection (a) in not less than three
locations.
(2) First location criteria.--Not less than one location
selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following
criteria:
(A) The location is a pharmacy at a military medical
treatment facility.
(B) The patients participating in the pilot program at such
location generally receive primary care services from health
care providers at such facility.
(3) Second location criteria.--Not less than one location
selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following
criteria:
(A) The location is a pharmacy at a military medical
treatment facility.
(B) The patients participating in the pilot program at such
location generally do not receive primary care services from
health care providers at such facility.
(4) Third location criterion.--Not less than one location
selected under paragraph (1) shall be a pharmacy located at a
location other than a military medical treatment facility.
(d) Duration.--The Secretary shall carry out the pilot
program under subsection (a) for a period determined
appropriate by the Secretary that is not less than two years.
(e) Report.--Not later than 30 months after the date on
which the Secretary commences the pilot program under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the pilot
program that includes--
(1) information on the effect of medication therapy
management services on--
(A) patient use and outcomes of prescription medications;
and
(B) the costs of health care;
(2) the recommendations of the Secretary with respect to
incorporating medication therapy management into the TRICARE
program; and
(3) such other information as the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(f) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``medication therapy management'' means
professional services provided by qualified pharmacists to
patients to improve the effective use and outcomes of
prescription medications provided to the patients.
(2) The term ``TRICARE program'' has the meaning given that
term in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 726. REPORT ON REDUCTION OF PRIME SERVICE AREAS.

(a) In General.--Section 732 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 1816), as amended by section 701 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113-66), is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections
(c) and (d), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsection (b):
``(b) Additional Report.--
``(1) Implementation.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the status of
reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions
described in subsection (d)(1)(B).
``(2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1)
shall include the following:
``(A) Details regarding the impact to affected eligible
beneficiaries with respect to the reduction of the
availability of TRICARE Prime in regions described in
subsection (d)(1)(B), including, with respect to each State--
``(i) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who, as
of the date of the report, are enrolled in TRICARE Standard;
``(ii) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who,
as of the date of the report; changed residences to remain
eligible for TRICARE Prime in a new region; and
``(iii) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who,
as of the date of the report, have made an election described
in subsection (c)(1).
``(B) The estimated increase in annual costs per each
affected eligible beneficiary counted under subparagraph (A)
as compared to the estimated annual costs if a contract
described in subsection (a)(2)(A) did not affect the
eligibility of the beneficiary for TRICARE Prime.
``(C) A description of the efforts of the Secretary to
assess--
``(i) the impact on access to health care for affected
eligible beneficiaries; and
``(ii) the satisfaction of such beneficiaries with respect
to access to health care under TRICARE Standard.
``(D) A description of the estimated cost savings realized
by reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions
described in subsection (d)(1)(B).''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b)(3)(A) of such
section is amended by striking ``subsection (c)(1)(B)'' and
inserting ``subsection (d)(1)(B)''.

SEC. 727. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON TRANSITION OF CARE
FOR POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER OR TRAUMATIC
BRAIN INJURY.

(a) Report.--Not later than April 1, 2015, the Comptroller
General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees and Committees on Veterans'
Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a
report that assesses the transition of care for post-
traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) The programs, policies, and regulations that affect the
transition of care, particularly with respect to individuals
who are taking or have been prescribed antidepressants,
stimulants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anxiolytic,
depressants, or hallucinogens.
(2) Upon transitioning to care furnished by the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs, the extent to which the pharmaceutical
treatment plan of an individual changes, and the factors
determining such changes.
(3) The extent to which the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs have worked together to
identify and apply best pharmaceutical treatment practices.
(4) A description of the off-formulary waiver process of
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the extent to which
the process is applied efficiently at the treatment level.
(5) The benefits and challenges of combining the
formularies across the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs.
(6) Any other issues that the Comptroller General
determines appropriate.
(c) Transition of Care Defined.--In this section, the term
``transition of care'' means the transition of an individual
from receiving treatment furnished by the Secretary of
Defense to treatment furnished by the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs.

SEC. 728. BRIEFING ON HOSPITALS IN ARREARS IN PAYMENTS TO
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the
Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives
and the Senate a briefing on the process used by the Defense
Health Agency to collect payments from non-Department of
Defense hospitals. Such briefing shall include a list of each
hospital that is more than 90 days in arrears in payments to
the Secretary, including the amount of arrears (by 30-day
increments) for each such hospital.

TITLE VIII--ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED
MATTERS

Subtitle A--Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures,
and Limitations

SEC. 801. EXTENSION TO UNITED STATES TRANSPORTATION COMMAND
OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROHIBITION ON
CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY.

Section 831(i)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 813) is
amended by inserting ``United States Transportation
Command,'' after ``United States Southern Command,''.

SEC. 802. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCED
COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT OR PROTOTYPE UNITS.

(a) Extension of Termination.--Subsection (b)(4) of section
819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by
striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting ``September 30,
2019''.
(b) Extension of Report Requirement.--Subsection (c) of
such section is amended by striking ``March 1, 2013'' and
inserting `` March 1, 2018''.

SEC. 803. AMENDMENT RELATING TO AUTHORITY OF THE DEFENSE
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN PROTOTYPE PROJECTS.

Section 845(a)(1) of Public Law 103-160 (10 U.S.C. 2371
note) is amended by striking ``weapons or weapon systems
proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of
Defense, or to improvement of weapons or weapon systems in
use by the Armed Forces'' and inserting the following:
``enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel
and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or
materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the
Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms,
systems, components, or materials in use by the Armed
Forces''.

SEC. 804. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AGGREGATE ANNUAL AMOUNT
AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACT SERVICES.

Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1489), as
amended by section 802 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 804)
is further amended--
(1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking ``or 2014'' and
inserting ``2014, or 2015'';
(2) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ``and 2014'' and
inserting ``2014, and 2015'';

[[Page H4573]]

(3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ``or 2014'' and
inserting ``2014, or 2015''; and
(4) in subsection (e), by striking ``2014'' and inserting
``2015''.

Subtitle B--Industrial Base Matters

SEC. 811. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AND AMENDMENTS TO TEST
PROGRAM FOR NEGOTIATION OF COMPREHENSIVE SMALL
BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLANS.

(a) Three-year Extension.--Subsection (e) of section 834 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990
and 1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is amended by striking
``December 31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2017''.
(b) Additional Requirements for Comprehensive
Subcontracting Plans.--Subsection (b) of section 834 of such
Act is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (3)'' and
inserting ``paragraph (4)'';
(2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4), and in
that paragraph by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting
``$100,000,000''; and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new
paragraph (3):
``(3) Each comprehensive subcontracting plan of a
contractor shall require that the contractor report to the
Secretary of Defense on a semi-annual basis the following
information:
``(A) The amount of first-tier subcontract dollars awarded
during the six-month period covered by the report to covered
small business concerns, with the information set forth
separately--
``(i) by North American Industrial Classification System
code;
``(ii) by major defense acquisition program, as defined in
section 2430(a) of title 10, United States Code;
``(iii) by contract, if the contract is for the
maintenance, overhaul, repair, servicing, rehabilitation,
salvage, modernization, or modification of supplies, systems,
or equipment and the total value of the contract, including
options, exceeds $100,000,000; and
``(iv) by military department.
``(B) The total number of subcontracts active under the
test program during the six-month period covered by the
report that would have otherwise required a subcontracting
plan under paragraph (4) or (5) of section 8(d) of the Small
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)).
``(C) Costs incurred in negotiating, complying with, and
reporting on comprehensive subcontracting plans.
``(D) Costs avoided by adoption of a comprehensive
subcontracting plan.
``(E) Any other information required by the Department of
Defense to complete the study required by subsection (f).''.
(c) Additional Consequence for Failure to Make Good Faith
Effort to Comply.--
(1) Amendments.--Subsection (d) of section 834 of such Act
is amended--
(A) by striking ``Company-wide'' and inserting
``Comprehensive'' in the heading;
(B) by striking ``company-wide'' and inserting
``comprehensive subcontracting''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following: ``In addition, any
such failure shall be a factor considered as part of the
evaluation of past performance of an offeror.''.
(2) Repeal of suspension of subsection (d).--Section 402 of
Public Law 101-574 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is repealed.
(d) Additional Report.--
(1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 834(f) of such
Act is amended by striking ``March 1, 1994, and March 1,
2012'' and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.
(2) Correction of reference to committee.--Such paragraph
is further amended by striking ``Committees'' and all that
follows through the end of such paragraph and inserting the
following: ``Committees on Armed Services and on Small
Business of the House of Representatives and the Committees
on Armed Services and on Small Business and Entrepreneurship
of the Senate''.
(e) Additional Definitions.--
(1) Covered small business concern.--Subsection (g) of
section 834 of such Act is amended to read as follows:
``(g) Definitions.--In this section, the term `covered
small business concern' includes each of the following:
``(1) A small business concern, as that term is defined
under section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C.
632(a));
``(2) A small business concern owned and controlled by
veterans, as that term is defined in section 3(q)(3) of such
Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(3)).
``(3) A small business concern owned and controlled by
service-disabled veterans, as that term is defined in section
3(q)(2) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(2)).
``(4) A qualified HUBZone small business concern, as that
term is defined under section 3(p)(5) of such Act (15 U.S.C.
632(p)(5)).
``(5) A small business concern owned and controlled by
socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, as that
term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of such Act (15 U.S.C.
637(d)(3)(C)).
``(6) A small business concern owned and controlled by
women, as that term is defined under section 3(n) of such Act
(15 U.S.C. 632(n)).''.
(2) Conforming amendment.--Subsection (a)(1) of section 834
of such Act is amended by striking ``small business concerns
and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially
and economically disadvantaged individuals'' and inserting
``covered small business concerns''.

SEC. 812. IMPROVING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SERVICE-DISABLED
VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES.

(a) Small Business Definition of Small Business Concern
Consolidated.--Section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 632(q)) is amended--
(1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
``(2) Small business concern owned and controlled by
service-disabled veterans.--The term `small business concern
owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans' means a
small business concern--
``(A)(i) not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one
or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any
publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the
stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled
veterans; and
``(ii) the management and daily business operations of
which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans
or, in the case of a veteran with permanent and severe
disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such
veteran; or
``(B)(i) not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one
or more veterans with service-connected disabilities that are
permanent and total who are unable to manage the daily
business operations of such concern or, in the case of a
publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the
stock of which is owned by one or more such veterans; and
``(ii) is included in the database described in section
8127(f) of title 38, United States Code.''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(6) Treatment of businesses after death of veteran-
owner.--
``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (C), if the
death of a service-disabled veteran causes a small business
concern to be less than 51 percent owned by one or more such
veterans, the surviving spouse of such veteran who acquires
ownership rights in such small business concern shall, for
the period described in subparagraph (B), be treated as if
the surviving spouse were that veteran for the purpose of
maintaining the status of the small business concern as a
small business concern owned and controlled by service-
disabled veterans.
``(B) Period described.--The period referred to in
subparagraph (A) is the period beginning on the date on which
the service-disabled veteran dies and ending on the earliest
of the following dates:
``(i) The date on which the surviving spouse remarries.
``(ii) The date on which the surviving spouse relinquishes
an ownership interest in the small business concern.
``(iii) The date that is ten years after the date of the
veteran's death.
``(C) Application to surviving spouse.--Subparagraph (A)
only applies to a surviving spouse of a veteran with a
service-connected disability if--
``(i) the veteran had a service-connected disability rated
as 100 percent disabling or died as a result of a service-
connected disability; and
``(ii) prior to the death of the veteran and during the
period in which the surviving spouse seeks to qualify under
this paragraph, the small business concern is included in the
database described in section 8127(f) of title 38, United
States Code.''.
(b) Veterans Affairs Definition of Small Business Concern
Consolidated.--Section 8127 of title 38, United States Code,
is amended--
(1) by striking subsection (h); and
(2) in subsection (l)(2), by striking ``means'' and all
that follows through the period at the end and inserting the
following: ``has the meaning given that term under section
3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)).''.
(c) SBA to Assume Control of Verification of Ownership and
Control Status of Applicants for Inclusion in the Database of
Small Businesses Owned and Controlled by Service Disabled
Veterans and Veterans.--The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631
et seq.), as amended by section 815, is further amended by
adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 49. VETS FIRST PROGRAM.

``In order to increase opportunities for small business
concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans
and small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans
in the Federal marketplace, not later than 180 days after the
effective date of this section, the Administrator shall enter
into a memorandum of understanding with the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs that transfers control and administration of
the program under subsections (e) through (g) of section 8127
of title 38, United States Code, to the Administrator,
consistent with the following:
``(1) Not later than 270 days after completing the
memorandum of understanding, the Administrator shall make
rules to carry out the memorandum. If the Administrator does
not make such rules by such date, the Administrator may not
exercise the authority under section 7(a)(25)(A) until such
time as those rules are made.
``(2) The Administrator shall assume authority and
responsibility for maintenance and operation of the database
and for verifications under the program. Any verifications
undertaken by the Administrator shall employ fraud prevention
measures at the time of the initial application, through
detection and monitoring processes after initial acceptance,
by investigating allegations of potential fraud, removing
firms that do not quality from the database, and referring
cases for prosecution when appropriate.
``(3) Any appeal by a small business concern, at the time
that verification is denied or a contract is awarded, of any
determination under the program shall be heard by the Office
of Hearings and Appeals of the Small Business Administration.
``(4)(A) The Secretary shall, for a period of 6 years
commencing on a date agreed to in the completed memorandum,
reimburse to the Administrator of the Small Business
Administration any costs incurred by the Administrator for

[[Page H4574]]

actions undertaken pursuant to the memorandum from fees
collected by the Secretary of Veteran Affairs under multiple-
award schedule contracts. The Administrator and the Secretary
shall endeavor to ensure maximum efficiency in such actions.
Any disputes between the Secretary and the Administrator
shall be resolved by the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget.
``(B) The Secretary and the Administrator may extend the
term of the memorandum of understanding, except for the
reimbursement requirement under subparagraph (A). The
Secretary and the Administrator may in a separate memorandum
of understanding provide for an extension of such
reimbursement.
``(5) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment
of this section, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary
and the Administrator shall--
``(A) meet to discuss ways to improve collaboration under
the memorandum to increase opportunities for service-disabled
veteran-owned small businesses and veteran-owned small
businesses; and
``(B) consult with congressionally chartered Veterans
Service Organizations to discuss ways to increase
opportunities for service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses and veteran-owned small businesses.
``(6) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment
of this section, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary
and the Administrator shall report to the Committee on Small
Business and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the House
of Representatives, and the Committee on Small Business and
Entrepreneurship and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of
the Senate on the progress made by the Secretary and the
Administrator implementing this section.
``(7) In any meeting required under paragraph (5), the
Secretary and the Administrator shall include in the
discussion of ways to improve collaboration under the
memorandum to increase opportunities for small businesses
owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans who are
women or minorities and small business concerns owned and
controlled by veterans who are women or minorities.''.
(d) Memorandum of Understanding.--Section 8127(f) of title
38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following:
``(7) Not later than 180 days after the effective date of
this paragraph, the Secretary shall enter into a memorandum
of understanding with the Administrator of the Small Business
Administration consistent with section 48 of the Small
Business Act, which shall specify the manner in which the
Secretary shall notify the Administrator as to whether an
individual is a veteran and if that veteran has a service-
connected disability.''.

SEC. 813. PLAN FOR IMPROVING DATA ON BUNDLED AND CONSOLIDATED
CONTRACTS.

Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(s) Data Quality Improvement Plan.--
``(1) In general.--Not later than the first day of fiscal
year 2016, the Administrator of the Small Business
Administration, in consultation with the Small Business
Procurement Advisory Council, the Administrator for Federal
Procurement Policy, and the Administrator of the General
Services Administration shall develop a plan to improve the
quality of data reported on bundled and consolidated
contracts in the Federal procurement data system.
``(2) Plan requirements.--The plan shall--
``(A) describe the roles and responsibilities of the
Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the
Directors of the Offices of Small and Disadvantaged Business
Utilization, the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council,
the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, the
Administrator of the General Services Administration, the
senior procurement executives, and Chief Acquisition Officers
in implementing the plan described in paragraph (1) and
contributing to the annual report required by subsection
(p)(4);
``(B) make necessary changes to policies and procedures on
proper identification and mitigation of contract bundling and
consolidation, and to training procedures of relevant
personnel on proper identification and mitigation of contract
bundling and consolidation;
``(C) establish consequences for failure to properly
identify contracts as bundled or consolidated;
``(D) establish requirements for periodic and statistically
valid data verification and validation; and
``(E) assign clear data verification responsibilities.
``(3) Committee briefing.--Once finalized and by not later
than 90 days prior to implementation, the plan described in
this subsection shall be presented to the Committee on Small
Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate.
``(4) Implementation.--Not later than the first day of
fiscal year 2017, the Administrator of the Small Business
Administration shall implement the plan described in this
subsection.
``(5) Certification.--The Administrator shall annually
provide to the Committee on Small Business of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and
Entrepreneurship of the Senate certification of the accuracy
and completeness of data reported on bundled and consolidated
contracts.
``(6) GAO study and report.--
``(A) Study.--Not later than the first day of fiscal year
2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall
initiate a study on the effectiveness of the plan described
in this subsection that shall assess whether contracts were
accurately labeled as bundled or consolidated.
``(B) Contracts evaluated.--For the purposes of conducting
the study described in subparagraph (A), the Comptroller
General of the United States--
``(i) shall evaluate, for work in each of sectors 23, 33,
54, and 56 (as defined by the North American Industry
Classification System), not fewer than 100 contracts in each
sector;
``(ii) shall evaluate only those contracts--

``(I) awarded by an agency listed in section 901(b) of
title 31, United States Code; and
``(II) that have a Base and Exercised Options Value, an
Action Obligation, or a Base and All Options Value exceeding
$10,000,000; and

``(iii) shall not evaluate contracts that have used any set
aside authority.
``(C) Report.--Not later than 12 months after initiating
the study required by subparagraph (A), the Comptroller
General of the United States shall report to the Committee on
Small Business of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the
Senate on the results from such study and, if warranted, any
recommendations on how to improve the quality of data
reported on bundled and consolidated contracts.
``(7) Definitions.--In this subsection the following
definitions shall apply:
``(A) Chief acquisition officer; senior procurement
executive.--The terms `Chief Acquisition Officer' and `senior
procurement executive' have the meanings given such terms in
section 44 of this Act.
``(B) Federal procurement data system definitions.--The
terms `Base and Exercised Options Value', `Action
Obligation', `Base and All Options Value', and `set aside
authority' have the meanings given such terms by the
Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy in the Federal
procurement data system on October 1, 2013, or subsequent
equivalent terms.''.

SEC. 814. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE EDUCATION TO SMALL BUSINESSES
ON CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF ARMS EXPORT CONTROL
ACT.

(a) Assistance at Small Business Development Centers.--
Section 21(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C.
648(c)(1)) is amended by inserting at the end the following:
``Applicants receiving grants under this section shall also
assist small businesses by providing, where appropriate,
education on the requirements applicable to small businesses
under the regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with
those requirements.''.
(b) Procurement Technical Assistance.--Section 2418 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end
the following new subsection:
``(c) An eligible entity assisted by the Department of
Defense under this chapter also may furnish education on the
requirements applicable to small businesses under the
regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with those
requirements.''.

SEC. 815. PROHIBITION ON REVERSE AUCTIONS FOR COVERED
CONTRACTS.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that,
when used appropriately, reverse auctions may improve the
Federal Government's procurement of commercially available
commodities by increasing competition, reducing prices, and
improving opportunities for small businesses.
(b) Use of Reverse Auctions.--The Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended--
(1) by redesignating section 47 as section 48; and
(2) by inserting after section 46 the following:

``SEC. 47. REVERSE AUCTIONS PROHIBITED FOR COVERED CONTRACTS.

``(a) In General.--In the case of a covered contract
described in subsection (c), reverse auction methods may not
be used--
``(1) if the covered contract is suitable for award to a
small business concern; or
``(2) if the award is to be made under--
``(A) section 8(a);
``(B) section 8(m);
``(C) section 15(a);
``(D) section 15(j);
``(E) section 31;
``(F) section 36; or
``(G) section 8127 of title 38, United States Code.
``(b) Limitations on Using Reverse Auctions.--
``(1) Number of offers; revisions to bids.--A Federal
agency may not award a covered contract using a reverse
auction method if only one offer is received or if offerors
do not have the ability to submit revised bids throughout the
course of the auction.
``(2) Other procurement authority.--A Federal agency may
not award a covered contract under a procurement provision
other than those provisions described in subsection (a)(2) if
the justification for using such procurement provision is to
use reverse auction methods.
``(c) Definitions.--In this section the following
definitions apply:
``(1) Covered contract.--The term `covered contract' means
a contract--
``(A) for services, including design and construction
services; and
``(B) for goods in which the technical qualifications of
the offeror constitute part of the basis of award.
``(2) Design and construction services.--The term `design
and construction services' means--
``(A) site planning and landscape design;
``(B) architectural and interior design;
``(C) engineering system design;
``(D) performance of construction work for facility,
infrastructure, and environmental restoration projects;
``(E) delivery and supply of construction materials to
construction sites;
``(F) construction, alteration, or repair, including
painting and decorating, of public buildings and public
works; and

[[Page H4575]]

``(G) architectural and engineering services as defined in
section 1102 of title 40, United States Code.
``(3) Reverse auction.--The term `reverse auction' means,
with respect to procurement by an agency, a real-time auction
conducted through an electronic medium between a group of
offerors who compete against each other by submitting offers
for a contract or task order with the ability to submit
revised offers throughout the course of the auction.''.
(c) Contracts Awarded by Secretary of Veterans Affairs.--
Section 8127(j) of title 38, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) The provisions of section 47(a) of the Small Business
Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) (relating to the prohibition on
using reverse auction methods to award a contract) shall
apply to a contract awarded under this section.''.

SEC. 816. SBA SURETY BOND GUARANTEE.

Section 411(c)(1) of the Small Business Investment Act of
1958 (15 U.S.C. 694b(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``70'' and
inserting ``90''.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

SEC. 821. CERTIFICATION OF EFFECTIVENESS FOR AIR FORCE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTING.

(a) Review Required.--The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff shall conduct a review of the Air Force Network-Centric
Solutions II (NETCENTS II) contract to ensure that it can
effectively meet the requirements of the joint force when
providing time- and task-critical information technology
resources for hardware, applications, and services related to
the warfighting mission area. The review shall examine--
(1) the effectiveness of contracting for warfighting
mission areas, such as nuclear command and control, space
situational awareness, or integrated threat warning, with
effectiveness determined by the ability to consistently
access domain experts and respond to emerging requirements in
a timely manner; and
(2) the efficiency of contracting for the warfighting
mission area, with efficiency measured by the amount of time
to get new task orders on contract.
(b) Certification.--Based on the findings of the review
required by subsection (a), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff shall provide a certification to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives
that the Air Force's NETCENTS II contract is effective in
delivering information technology capabilities for the joint
force. In providing this certification, the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff shall also provide the complete
findings of the review required by subsection (a).

SEC. 822. AIRLIFT SERVICE.

(a) In General.--Chapter 157 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 2631a the
following new section:

``Sec. 2631b. Airlift service

``(a) Requirement.--Except as provided in subsections (b)
and (c), the transportation of passengers or property by
CRAF-eligible aircraft obtained by the Secretary of Defense
or the Secretary of a military department through a contract
for airlift service may only be provided by a covered air
carrier.
``(b) Applicability.--The requirement under subsection (a)
applies with respect to transportation that is--
``(1) interstate in the United States;
``(2) between a place in the United States and a place
outside the United States; or
``(3) between two places outside the United States.
``(c) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive
the requirement under subsection (a) if the Secretary
determines that--
``(1) no covered air carrier is capable of providing, and
willing to provide, the relevant transportation; or
``(2) use of a covered air carrier is otherwise
unreasonable.
``(d) Definitions.--In this section, the following
definitions apply:
``(1) Covered air carrier.--The term `covered air carrier'
means an air carrier that--
``(A) has aircraft in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet or offers
to place CRAF-eligible aircraft in that fleet; and
``(B) holds a certificate issued under section 41102 of
title 49.
``(2) CRAF-eligible aircraft.--The term `CRAF-eligible
aircraft' means an aircraft of a type that the Secretary of
Defense has determined to be eligible to participate in the
Civil Reserve Air Fleet.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 2631a the following new item:

``2631b. Airlift service.''.

SEC. 823. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR SENIOR DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE OFFICIALS SEEKING EMPLOYMENT WITH
DEFENSE CONTRACTORS.

Section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new
subsection (d):
``(d) Compliance.--
``(1) Official.--The Secretary of Defense shall designate
an official of the Department of Defense to ensure the
compliance of this section.
``(2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this subsection, such designated official
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the compliance of this section.''.

SEC. 824. PROCUREMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT.

(a) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall use best
value tradeoff source selection methods to the maximum extent
practicable when procuring an item of personal protective
equipment or critical safety items.
(b) Personal Protective Equipment Defined.--In this
section, the term ``personal protective equipment'' includes
the following:
(1) Body armor components.
(2) Combat helmets.
(3) Combat protective eyewear.
(4) Environmental and fire resistant clothing.
(5) Footwear.
(6) Organizational clothing and individual equipment.
(7) Other items as determined appropriate by the Secretary.

SEC. 825. PROHIBITION ON FUNDS FOR CONTRACTS VIOLATING
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 11246.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may
be used to enter into any contract with any entity if such
contract would violate Executive Order No. 11246 (relating to
nonretaliation for disclosure of compensation information),
as amended by the announcement of the President on April 8,
2014.

SEC. 826. REQUIREMENT FOR POLICIES AND STANDARD CHECKLIST IN
PROCUREMENT OF SERVICES.

(a) Requirement.--Section 2330a of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (g), (h), (i), and (j) as
subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new
subsection (g):
``(g) Request for Service Contract Approval.--The Under
Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall--
``(1) issue policies implementing a standard checklist to
be completed before the issuance of a solicitation for any
new contract for services or exercising an option under an
existing contract for services, including services provided
under a contract for goods; and
``(2) ensure such policies and checklist are incorporated
into the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation.''.
(b) Army Model.--In implementing section 2330a(g) of title
10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), the Under
Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall model,
to the maximum extent practicable, its policies and checklist
on the policies and checklist relating to services contract
approval established and in use by the Department of the Army
(as set forth in the request for services contract approval
form updated as of August 2012, or any successor form).
(c) Deadline.--The policies required under such section
2230a(g) shall be issued within 120 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act.
(d) Report.--The Comptroller General of the United States
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the implementation of the standard checklist required
under such section 2330a(g) for each of fiscal years 2015,
2016, and 2017 within 120 days after the end of each such
fiscal year.

TITLE IX--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

Subtitle A--Department of Defense Management

SEC. 901. REDESIGNATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AS THE
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.

(a) Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the
Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.--
(1) Redesignation of military department.--The military
department designated as the Department of the Navy is
redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(2) Redesignation of secretary and other statutory
offices.--
(A) Secretary.--The position of the Secretary of the Navy
is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine
Corps.
(B) Other statutory offices.--The positions of the Under
Secretary of the Navy, the four Assistant Secretaries of the
Navy, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy
are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the Navy and
Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and
Marine Corps, and the General Counsel of the Department of
the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively.
(b) Conforming Amendments to Title 10, United States
Code.--
(1) Definition of ``military department''.--Paragraph (8)
of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
to read as follows:
``(8) The term `military department' means the Department
of the Army, the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, and
the Department of the Air Force.''.
(2) Organization of department.--The text of section 5011
of such title is amended to read as follows: ``The Department
of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under
the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.''.
(3) Position of secretary.--Section 5013(a)(1) of such
title is amended by striking ``There is a Secretary of the
Navy'' and inserting ``There is a Secretary of the Navy and
Marine Corps''.
(4) Chapter headings.--
(A) The heading of chapter 503 of such title is amended to
read as follows:

``CHAPTER 503--DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE CORPS''.

(B) The heading of chapter 507 of such title is amended to
read as follows:

``CHAPTER 507--COMPOSITION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AND MARINE
CORPS''.

(5) Other amendments.--

[[Page H4576]]

(A) Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking
``Department of the Navy'' and ``Secretary of the Navy'' each
place they appear other than as specified in paragraphs (1),
(2), (3), and (4) (including in section headings, subsection
captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and
inserting ``Department of the Navy and Marine Corps'' and
``Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps'', respectively, in
each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface
and typestyle as the matter stricken.
(B)(i) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2),
5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking
``Assistant Secretaries of the Navy'' and inserting
``Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps''.
(ii) The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the
item relating to such section in the table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by
inserting ``and Marine Corps'' after ``of the Navy'', with
the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface
and typestyle as the matter amended.
(c) Other Provisions of Law and Other References.--
(1) Title 37, united states code.--Title 37, United States
Code, is amended by striking ``Department of the Navy'' and
``Secretary of the Navy'' each place they appear and
inserting ``Department of the Navy and Marine Corps'' and
``Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps'', respectively.
(2) Other references.--Any reference in any law other than
in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any
regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United
States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to
be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine
Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in
subsection (a)(2) shall be considered to be a reference to
that office as redesignated by that section.
(d) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made
by this section shall take effect on the first day of the
first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 902. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DIRECTOR OF
OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION.

(a) Additional Responsibility.--Section 139 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g),
(h), (i), (j), and (k) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g),
(h), (i), (j), (k), and (l), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new
subsection (c):
``(c) The Director shall consider the potential for
increases in program cost estimates or delays in schedule
estimates in the implementation of policies, procedures, and
activities related to operational test and evaluation and
shall take appropriate action to ensure that operational test
and evaluation activities do not unnecessarily increase
program costs or impede program schedules.''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 196(c)(1)(A)(ii) of such
title is amended by striking ``section 139(i)'' and inserting
``section 139(k)''.

SEC. 903. ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR INSTALLATIONS
AND ENVIRONMENT.

(a) Establishment of Position.--Section 138(b) of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following new paragraph:
``(11) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. In
addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph
(1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and
Environment shall have the duties specified in section 138e
of this title.''.
(b) Duties.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 4 of such title is amended by
inserting after section 138d the following new section:

``Sec. 138e. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations
and Environment

``(a) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations
and Environment shall--
``(1) provide leadership and facilitate communication
regarding, and conduct oversight to manage and be accountable
for, military construction and environmental programs within
the Department of Defense and the Army, Navy, Air Force, and
Marine Corps;
``(2) coordinate and oversee planning and programming
activities of the Department of Defense and the Army, Navy,
Air Force, and Marine Corps;
``(3) establish policies and guidance, in coordination with
the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps, regarding
installation assets and services that are required to support
defense missions.
``(b) The Assistant Secretary may communicate views on
issues within the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary
directly to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary
of Defense without obtaining the approval or concurrence of
any other official within the Department of Defense.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections for chapter
4 of such title is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 138c the following new item:

``138e. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and
Environment.''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) In general.--
(A) Section 2701(k)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for
Installations and Environment'' and inserting ``Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment''.
(B) Section 2885(a)(3) of such title is amended by striking
``Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and
Environment)'' and inserting ``Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Installations and Environment''.
(2) References in other laws.--Any reference in any law,
regulation, document, or other record of the United States to
the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and
Environment shall be treated as referring to the Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment.
(d) No Additional Funds Authorized.--No additional funds
are authorized by this Act to accomplish the mission of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and
Environment. Such mission shall be carried out using amounts
otherwise authorized or appropriated.
(e) Restriction on Personnel.--The number of positions for
military and civilian personnel and the number of full-time
equivalent positions for contractor personnel associated with
the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Installations and Environment shall not exceed the number of
such positions that were associated with the Deputy Under
Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment as of
the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Construction.--Nothing in this section or the
amendments made by this section shall be construed as
exempting the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Installations and Environment from further reductions as
part of headquarters efficiencies initiatives of the
Department of Defense.

SEC. 904. REQUIREMENT FOR CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING BEFORE
DIVESTING OF DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING
SERVICE FUNCTIONS.

No plan may be implemented by the Secretary of Defense, the
Secretary of a military department, the Director of the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service, or any other person
to transfer financial management, bill paying, or accounting
services functions from the Defense Finance and Accounting
Service to another entity until the Secretary of Defense
provides the congressional defense committees a briefing on
the plan and the Secretary certifies to such committees that
the plan would reduce costs, increase efficiencies, maintain
the timeline for auditability of financial statements, and
maintain the roles and missions of the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service.

SEC. 905. COMBATANT COMMAND EFFICIENCY PLAN.

(a) Plan Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop
a plan to combine the back office functions of the
headquarters of two or more combatant commands, including the
subordinate component commands.
(b) Matters to Be Considered.--The plan required by
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A detailed discussion of combining or otherwise sharing
in whole or in part similar back office functions between two
or more combatant command headquarters located in the same
country.
(2) A detailed discussion of combining or otherwise sharing
in whole or in part similar back office functions of the
Joint Staff and some or all combatant command headquarters.
(3) A detailed discussion of establishing a new
organization to manage similar back office functions of two
or more combatant command headquarters located in the same
country.
(4) A detailed discussion of the risks and capabilities
lost by implementing such consolidations and efficiencies.
(5) A detailed discussion of how the efficiencies and
consolidations in assigned personnel and resources are in
support of the quadrennial defense review and the strategic
choices and management review of the Department of Defense.
(6) Any other arrangements that the Secretary considers
appropriate.
(c) Report Required.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a report containing--
(1) a summary of the plan required by subsection (a); and
(2) the potential cost savings of any arrangements the
Secretary considers in conducting the study.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Back office functions.--The term ``back office
functions'' means the administration and support functions of
a headquarters of a combatant command, including human
resources or other personnel functions, budgeting, and
information technology support.
(2) Combatant command.--The term ``combatant command''
means a combatant command established pursuant to section 161
or 167 of title 10, United States Code.
(e) Limitation.--Of the amounts authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of
Defense for operations and maintenance, defense-wide, Joint
Chiefs of Staff, as specified in the funding table for
section 4301, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or
expended until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provides the
Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives
the briefing on combatant command headquarters personnel and
resources requirements as directed in the Report of the
Committee on Armed Services on H.R. 1960 of the 113th
Congress (House Report 113-102) under title X.

SEC. 906. REQUIREMENT FOR PLAN TO REDUCE GEOGRAPHIC COMBATANT
COMMANDS TO FOUR BY FISCAL YEAR 2020.

(a) Plan Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop
a plan for reducing the number of geographic combatant
commands to no more than four by the end of fiscal year 2020.
(b) Matters Covered.--The plan required by subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) A detailed discussion of the required reductions and
consolidations in assigned personnel, resources, and
infrastructure of the various geographic combatant commands,
set forth

[[Page H4577]]

separately by fiscal year, to achieve the goal of no more
than four such commands by the end of fiscal year 2020.
(2) A detailed discussion of the changes to the Unified
Command Plan if such reductions and consolidations are
implemented.
(3) A detailed discussion and recommendations on the
feasibility, risks, and capabilities lost by implementing
such reductions and consolidations.
(c) Functional Commands Not Included.--Nothing in this
section shall be construed as requiring the Department of
Defense to include changes to the functional combatant
commands or reductions in the functional combatant commands
in the plan required by subsection (a).
(d) Use of Previous Studies and Outside Experts.--In
developing the plan required by subsection (a), the Secretary
may--
(1) use and incorporate previous plans or studies of the
Department of Defense; and
(2) consult with and incorporate views of defense experts
from outside the Department.
(e) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress
a report containing the plan required by subsection (a),
including the feasibility and risks of such plan, and any
recommendations to implement the plan as the Secretary
considers appropriate.
(f) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed as requiring the Secretary to develop a binding
plan.

SEC. 907. OFFICE OF NET ASSESSMENT.

(a) Policy.--It is the policy of the United States to
maintain an independent organization within the Department of
Defense to develop and coordinate net assessments of the
standing, trends, and future prospects of the military
capabilities and potential of the United States in comparison
with the military capabilities and potential of other
countries or groups of countries so as to identify emerging
or future threats or opportunities for the United States.
(b) Establishment.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 145. OFFICE OF NET ASSESSMENT.

``(a) In General.--There is in the Office of the Secretary
of Defense an office known as the Office of Net Assessment.
``(b) Head.--(1) The head of the Office of Net Assessment
shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense. The head
shall be a member of the Senior Executive Service.
``(2) The head of the Office of Net Assessment may
communicate views on matters within the responsibility of the
head directly to the Secretary without obtaining the approval
or concurrence of any other official within the Department of
Defense.
``(3) The head of the Office of Net Assessment shall report
directly to the Secretary.
``(4) The Office is subject to the authority, direction,
and control of the Secretary. The Secretary may not delegate
the responsibility to exercise such authority, direction, and
control over the Office.
``(c) Responsibilities.--The Office of Net Assessment shall
develop and coordinate net assessments with respect to the
standing, trends, and future prospects of the military
capabilities and potential of the United States in comparison
with the military capabilities and potential of other
countries or groups of countries to identify emerging or
future threats or opportunities for the United States.
``(d) Budget.--In the budget materials submitted to the
President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the
submittal to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31,
of the budget for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2014, the
Secretary shall ensure that a separate, dedicated program
element is assigned for the Office of Net Assessment.
``(e) Net Assessment Defined.--In this section, the term
`net assessment' means the comparative analysis of military,
technological, political, economic, and other factors
governing the relative military capability of nations.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended by adding at
the end the following new item:

``145. Office of Net Assessment.''.

SEC. 908. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.

(a) Deputy Chief Management Officer.--Subsection (b) of
section 132a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to
read as follows:
``(b) Responsibilities.--Subject to the authority,
direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the
Deputy Chief Management Officer shall perform such duties and
exercise such powers as the Secretary may prescribe. The
Deputy Chief Management Officer shall--
``(1) assist the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy
Secretary's capacity as Chief Management Officer of the
Department of Defense under section 132(c) of this title and
perform those duties assigned by the Secretary of Defense or
delegated by the Deputy Secretary pursuant to section
904(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 10 U.S.C. 132 note);
``(2) assist the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy
Secretary's capacity as the Chief Operating Officer of the
Department of Defense under section 1123 of title 31;
``(3) establish policies for the strategic management and
integration of the Department of Defense business operations
and activities;
``(4) have the responsibilities specified for the Deputy
Chief Management Officer for the purposes of section 2222 of
this title; and
``(5) be the Performance Improvement Officer of the
Department of Defense for the purposes of section 1124(a)(1)
of title 31.''.
(b) Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense.--
(1) Statutory establishment of position.--Chapter 4 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after
section 141 the following new section:

``Sec. 142. Chief information officer

``(a) There is a Chief Information Officer of the
Department of Defense.
``(b)(1) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense--
``(A) is the Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense for the purposes of sections 3506(a)(2) and
3544(a)(3) of title 44;
``(B) has the responsibilities and duties specified in
section 11315 of title 40; and
``(C) has the responsibilities specified for the Chief
Information Officer in sections 2222, 2223(a), and 2224 of
this title.
``(2) The Chief Information Officer shall perform such
additional duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary
of Defense may prescribe.
``(c) The Chief Information Officer takes precedence in the
Department of Defense with the officials serving in positions
specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title. The officials
serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) and the
Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense take
precedence among themselves in the order prescribed by the
Secretary of Defense.''.
(2) Placement in the office of the secretary of defense.--
Section 131(b) of such title is amended--
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through (8) as
paragraphs (6) through (9), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new
paragraph (5):
``(5) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense.''.
(c) Repeal of Requirement for Defense Business System
Management Committee.--Section 186 of title 10, United States
Code, is repealed.
(d) Assignment of Responsibility for Defense Business
Systems.--Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1);
(B) by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph (2) and
inserting a period; and
(C) by striking paragraph (3);
(2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``Defense Business
Systems Management Committee'' and inserting ``investment
review board established under subsection (g)''; and
(3) in subsection (g)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, not later than March
15, 2012,'';
(B) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ``each'' the first
place it appears and inserting ``the''; and
(C) in paragraph (2)(F), by striking ``and the Defense
Business Systems Management Committee, as required by section
186(c) of this title,''.
(e) Deadline for Establishment of Investment Review Board
and Investment Management Process.--The investment review
board and investment management process required by section
2222(g) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by
subsection (d)(3), shall be established not later than March
15, 2015.
(f) Amendments Relating to Certain Prescribed Assistant
Secretary of Defense Positions.--Chapter 4 of title 10,
United States Code, is further amended as follows:
(1) Assistant secretary of defense for logistics and
materiel readiness.--Paragraph (7) of section 138(b) is
amended--
(A) by inserting after ``Readiness'' in the first sentence
the following: ``, who shall be appointed from among persons
with an extensive background in the sustainment of major
weapons systems and combat support equipment'';
(B) by striking the second sentence;
(C) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as
amended by subparagraph (B)) the text of subsection (b) of
section 138a of such title;
(D) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as
amended by subparagraph (C)) the text of subsection (c) of
section 138a of such title; and
(E) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) in the text
transferred by subparagraph (D) of this paragraph as
subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.
(2) Assistant secretary of defense for research and
engineering.--Paragraph (8) of such section is amended--
(A) by striking the second sentence and inserting the text
of subsection (a) of section 138b;
(B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A)
of this paragraph the following: ``The Assistant Secretary,
in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation, shall--'';
(C) by transferring paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection
(b) of section 138b to the end of that paragraph (as amended
by subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph), indenting
those paragraphs 2 ems from the left margin, and
redesignating those paragraphs as subparagraphs (A) and (B),
respectively;
(D) in subparagraph (A) (as so transferred and
redesignated)--
(i) by striking ``The Assistant Secretary'' and all that
follows through ``Test and Evaluation, shall''; and
(ii) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``;
and''; and
(E) in subparagraph (B) (as so transferred and
redesignated), by striking ``The Assistant Secretary'' and
all that follows through ``Test and Evaluation, shall''.
(3) Assistant secretary of defense for nuclear, chemical,
and biological defense programs.--Paragraph (10) of such
section is amended--

[[Page H4578]]

(A) by striking the second sentence and inserting the text
of subsection (b) of section 138d; and
(B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A)
of this paragraph the text of subsection (a) of such section
and in that text as so inserted--
(i) by striking ``of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and
Biological Defense Programs'' and
(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) as
subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.
(4) Repeal of separate sections.--Sections 138a, 138b, and
138d are repealed.
(g) Codification of Restrictions on Use of the Deputy Under
Secretary of Defense Title.--
(1) Codification.--Section 137a(a) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
``(3) The officials authorized under this section shall be
the only Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense.''.
(2) Conforming repeal.--Section 906(a)(2) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law
111-84; 123 Stat. 2426; 10 U.S.C. 137a note) is repealed.
(3) Conforming amendment for the vacancy reform act of
1998.--Section 137a(b) of such title is amended by striking
``is absent or disabled'' and inserting ``dies, resigns, or
is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of
the office''.
(h) Clarification of Order of Precedence for the Principal
Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense and the Assistant
Secretaries of Defense.--
(1) Subsection (d) of section 137a of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by striking ``and the Deputy Chief
Management Officer of the Department of Defense'' and
inserting ``the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the
Department of Defense, and the officials serving in the
positions specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title and
the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense''.
(2) Subsection (d) of section 138 of such title is amended
by inserting ``and the Chief Information Officer of the
Department of Defense'' after ``section 131(b)(4) of this
title''.
(i) Conforming Amendment to Prior Reduction in the Number
of Assistant Secretaries of Defense.--Section 5315 of title
5, United States Code, is amended by striking ``Assistant
Secretaries of Defense (16)'' and inserting ``Assistant
Secretaries of Defense (14)''.
(j) Clerical and Conforming Amendments.--Title 10, United
States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 is
amended--
(A) by striking the items relating to sections 138a, 138b,
and 138d; and
(B) by inserting after the item relating to section 141 the
following new item:

``142. Chief Information Officer.''.
(2) Section 131(b)(8), as redesignated by subsection
(b)(2)(A), is amended--
(A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (H) as
subparagraphs (B) through (I), respectively; and
(B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated
by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the following new
subparagraph (A):
``(A) The two Deputy Directors within the Office of the
Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation under
section 139a(c) of this title.''.
(3) Section 132(b) is amended by striking ``is disabled or
there is no Secretary of Defense'' and inserting ``dies,
resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and
duties of the office''.
(4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is
amended by striking the item relating to section 186.

SEC. 909. PERIODIC REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANAGEMENT
HEADQUARTERS.

(a) Plan Required.--Not later than 120 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
develop a plan for implementing a periodic review and
analysis of the Department of Defense personnel requirements
for management headquarters.
(b) Elements of Plan.--The plan required by subsection (a)
shall include the following for each covered organization:
(1) A list of the key Department of Defense strategic
guidance, policy, and mission requirements, including the
quadrennial defense review, the Unified Command Plan, and the
strategic choices and management review.
(2) A description of how current management headquarters
are structured to execute the Department of Defense strategic
guidance, policy, and mission requirements listed under
paragraph (1).
(3) A description of the critical capabilities and
skillsets required by management headquarters to execute
Department of Defense strategic guidance in order to fulfill
mission objectives.
(4) An identification and analysis of the factors that
directly or indirectly influence or contribute to the expense
of Department of Defense management headquarters
(5) A description of the proposed timeline and required
resources necessary to implement a permanent periodic review
and analysis of Department of Defense personnel requirements
for management headquarters.
(c) Covered Organization.--In this section, the term
``covered organization'' includes each of the following:
(1) The Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(2) The Joint Staff.
(3) The Defense Agencies.
(4) The Department of Defense field activities.
(5) The headquarters of the combatant commands.
(6) Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the
Office of the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief
of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff.
(7) The major command headquarters of the Army.
(8) The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office of
the Chief of Naval Operations, and Headquarters, United
States Marine Corps.
(9) The major command headquarters of the Navy and the
Marine Corps.
(10) Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, including
the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of
the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Air Staff.
(11) The major command headquarters of the Air Force.
(12) The National Guard Bureau.
(d) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
congressional defense committees the plan required by
subsection (a).
(e) Amendments.--Section 904(d)(2) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 816; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended--
(1) by striking ``2016'' and inserting ``2017'';
(2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``, consolidations,''
after ``through changes'';
(3) in subparagraph (C)--
(A) by inserting ``, consolidations,'' after ``through
changes''; and
(B) by inserting ``, or other associated cost drivers,
including a discussion of how the changes, consolidations, or
reductions were prioritized,'' after ``programs and
offices'';
(4) in subparagraph (E), by inserting ``, including the
risks of, and capabilities gained or lost by implementing,
such modifications'' before the period; and
(5) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
``(F) A description of how the plan supports or affects
current Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and
mission requirements, including the quadrennial defense
review, the Unified Command Plan, and the strategic choices
and management review.
``(G) A description of the associated costs specifically
addressed by the savings.''.

Subtitle B--Total Force Management

SEC. 911. MODIFICATIONS TO BIENNIAL STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLAN
RELATING TO SENIOR MANAGEMENT, FUNCTIONAL, AND
TECHNICAL WORKFORCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE.

(a) Senior Management Workforce.--Subsection (c) of section
115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
``(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a)
shall--
``(A) include a separate chapter to specifically address
the shaping and improvement of the senior management
workforce of the Department of Defense; and
``(B) include an assessment of the senior functional and
technical workforce of the Department of Defense within the
appropriate functional community.''; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``such senior management,
functional, and technical workforce'' and inserting ``such
senior management workforce and such senior functional and
technical workforce''.
(b) Highly Qualified Experts.--Such section is further
amended--
(1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``subsection (f)(1)''
in subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting ``subsection
(h)(1) or (h)(2)'';
(2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections
(g) and (h), respectively; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new
subsection (f):
``(f) Highly Qualified Experts.--
``(1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a)
shall include an assessment of the workforce of the
Department of Defense comprised of highly qualified experts
appointed pursuant to section 9903 of title 5 (in this
subsection referred to as the `HQE workforce').
``(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall
include, with respect to the HQE workforce--
``(A) an assessment of the critical skills and competencies
of the existing HQE workforce and projected trends in that
workforce based on expected losses due to retirement and
other attrition;
``(B) specific strategies for attracting, compensating, and
motivating the HQE workforce of the Department, including the
program objectives of the Department to be achieved through
such strategies and the funding needed to implement such
strategies;
``(C) any incentives necessary to attract or retain HQE
personnel;
``(D) any changes that may be necessary in resources or in
the rates or methods of pay needed to ensure the Department
has full access to appropriately qualified personnel; and
``(E) any legislative changes that may be necessary to
achieve HQE workforce goals.''.
(c) Definitions.--Subsection (h) of such section (as
redesignated by subsection (b)(2)) is amended to read as
follows:
``(h) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `senior management workforce of the
Department of Defense' includes the following categories of
Department of Defense civilian personnel:
``(A) Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under
section 3131 of title 5.
``(B) Persons serving in the Defense Intelligence Senior
Executive Service under section 1606 of this title.
``(2) The term `senior functional and technical workforce
of the Department of Defense' includes the following
categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:

[[Page H4579]]

``(A) Persons serving in positions described in section
5376(a) of title 5.
``(B) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to
section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103-337; 108 Stat. 2721), as
amended by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted
into law by Public Law 106-398 (114 Stat. 1654A-315)).
``(C) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to
section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note).
``(D) Persons serving in Intelligence Senior Level
positions under section 1607 of this title.
``(3) The term `acquisition workforce' includes individuals
designated under section 1721 of this title as filling
acquisition positions.''.
(d) Conforming Amendment.--The heading of subsection (c) of
such section is amended to read as follows: ``Senior
Management Workforce; Senior Functional and Technical
Workforce.--''.

SEC. 912. REPEAL OF EXTENSION OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT
ON INVENTORY.

Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2402), as
amended by section 951(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 839), is amended by striking ``2013, 2014, and
2015'' and inserting ``and 2013''.

SEC. 913. ASSIGNMENT OF CERTAIN NEW REQUIREMENTS BASED ON
DETERMINATIONS OF COST-EFFICIENCY.

(a) Amendment.--Chapter 146 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 2463 the
following new section:

``Sec. 2463a. Assignment of certain new requirements based on
determinations of cost-efficiency

``(a) Assignments Based on Determinations of Cost-
efficiency.--(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) and
subject to subsection (b), the assignment of performance of a
new requirement by the Department of Defense to military
personnel, civilian personnel, or contractor personnel shall
be based on a determination of which sector of the
Department's workforce can perform the services in the most
cost-efficient manner, based on an analysis of the costs to
the Federal Government in accordance with Department of
Defense Instruction 7041.04 (`Estimating and Comparing the
Full Costs of Civilian and Active Duty Military Manpower and
Contract Support') or successor guidance.
``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of a new
requirement that is inherently governmental, closely
associated with inherently governmental functions, critical,
or required by law to be performed by military personnel or
civilian personnel.
``(3) Nothing in this section may be construed as affecting
the requirements of the Department of Defense under policies
and procedures established by the Secretary of Defense under
section 129a of this title for determining the most
appropriate and cost-efficient mix of military, civilian, and
contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department
of Defense.
``(b) Waiver Authority.--(1) Notwithstanding subsection
(a), the Secretary of a military department, the commander of
a combatant command, or the head of a Defense Agency or
activity may waive such subsection and assign performance of
a new requirement without a determination of cost-efficiency
as required by such subsection if--
``(A) the Secretary, commander, or head certifies in
writing to the congressional defense committees that the time
required to conduct the determination of cost-efficiency
would result in a gap in service that would significantly
undermine performance of the mission of the Department of
Defense or pose an unacceptable risk; and
``(B) a period of 30 days has expired after such
certification is so submitted to the committees.
``(2) A waiver of subsection (a) may be in effect for a
period of not greater than 180 days.
``(3) The waiver authority under this subsection may not be
exercised after September 30, 2015.
``(c) Provisions Relating to Assignment of Civilian
Personnel.--If a new requirement is assigned to civilian
personnel consistent with the requirements of this section--
``(1) the Secretary of Defense may not--
``(A) impose any constraint or limitation on the size of
the civilian workforce in terms of man years, end strength,
full-time equivalent positions, or maximum number of
employees; or
``(B) require offsetting funding for civilian pay or
benefits or require a reduction in civilian full-time
equivalents or civilian end-strengths; and
``(2) the Secretary may assign performance of such
requirement without regard to whether the employee is a
temporary, term, or permanent employee.
``(d) New Requirement Described.--For purposes of this
section, a new requirement is an activity or function that is
not being performed, as of the date of consideration for
assignment of performance under this section, by military
personnel, civilian personnel, or contractor personnel at a
Department of Defense component, organization, installation,
or other entity. For purposes of the preceding sentence, an
activity or function that is performed at such an entity and
that is re-engineered, reorganized, modernized, upgraded,
expanded, or changed to become more efficient but is still
essentially providing the same service shall not be
considered a new requirement.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 2463 the following new item:

``2463a. Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations
of cost-efficiency.''.

SEC. 914. PROHIBITION ON CONVERSION OF FUNCTIONS PERFORMED BY
CIVILIAN OR CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL TO PERFORMANCE
BY MILITARY PERSONNEL.

Section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(g) Prohibition on Performance of Certain Functions by
Military Personnel.--(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2),
no functions performed by civilian personnel or contractors
may be converted to performance by military personnel
unless--
``(A) there is a direct link between the functions to be
performed and a military occupational specialty; and
``(B) the conversion to performance by military personnel
is cost effective, based on Department of Defense instruction
7041.04 (or any successor administrative regulation,
directive, or policy).
``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the following
functions:
``(A) Functions required by law or regulation to be
performed by military personnel.
``(B) Functions related to--
``(i) missions involving operation risks and combatant
status under the Law of War;
``(ii) specialized collective and individual training
requiring military-unique knowledge and skills based on
recent operational experience;
``(iii) independent advice to senior civilian leadership in
the Department of Defense requiring military-unique knowledge
and skills based on recent operational experience; and
``(iv) command and control arrangements under chapter 47 of
this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).''.

SEC. 915. NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION RELATING TO
PROCUREMENT OF SERVICES.

(a) Notification.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure
compliance with section 2330a of title 10, United States
Code, and shall provide, in writing, notification of such
compliance to the congressional defense committees not later
than March 1, 2015.
(b) Review by Comptroller General.--The Comptroller General
of the United States shall review the notification of
compliance required by subsection (a) and report any findings
or recommendations to the congressional defense committees
not later than 120 days after the date on which the
notification is provided.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

SEC. 921. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE REIMBURSEMENT OF
COSTS OF ACTIVITIES FOR NONGOVERNMENTAL
PERSONNEL AT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REGIONAL
CENTERS FOR SECURITY STUDIES.

Section 941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 184 note)
is amended by striking ``through 2014'' and inserting
``through 2019''.

SEC. 922. AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE AND MEMBERS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR
FORCE, AND MARINE CORPS TO OCCUPY QUARTERS ON A
RENTAL BASIS WHILE PERFORMING OFFICIAL TRAVEL.

(a) Definition.--Section 5911(a)(5) of title 5, United
States Code, is amended by striking ``Government; and'' and
inserting ``Government or commercial lodging arranged through
a Government lodging program; and''.
(b) Authority.--Section 5911(e) of title 5, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``(e) The'' and inserting ``(e)(1) Except
as provided in paragraph (2), the''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(2)(A) The Secretary of Defense may require an employee
of the Department of Defense or a member of the uniformed
services under the Secretary's jurisdiction performing duty
on official travel to occupy adequate quarters on a rental
basis when available.
``(B) A requirement under subparagraph (A) with respect to
an employee of the Department of Defense may not be construed
to be subject to negotiation under chapter 71 or any other
provision of this title.''.

SEC. 923. SINGLE STANDARD MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT RATE FOR
PRIVATELY OWNED AUTOMOBILES OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES AND MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED
SERVICES.

(a) In General.--Section 5704(a)(1) of title 5, United
States Code, is amended in the last sentence by striking all
that follows: ``the rate per mile'' and inserting ``shall be
the single standard mileage rate established by the Internal
Revenue Service.''.
(b) Regulations and Reports.--
(1) Provisions relating to privately owned airplanes and
motorcycles.--Paragraph (1)(A) of section 5707(b) of title 5,
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(1)(A) The Administrator of General Services shall
conduct periodic investigations of the cost of travel and the
operation of privately owned airplanes and privately owned
motorcycles by employees while engaged on official business,
and shall report the results of such investigations to
Congress at least once a year.''.
(2) Provisions relating to privately owned automobiles.--
Clause (i) of section 5707(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States
Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(i) shall provide that the mileage reimbursement rate for
privately owned automobiles, as provided in section
5704(a)(1), is the single standard mileage rate established
by the Internal Revenue Service referred to in that section,
and''.

[[Page H4580]]

TITLE X--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Financial Matters

SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

(a) Authority to Transfer Authorizations.--
(1) Authority.--Upon determination by the Secretary of
Defense that such action is necessary in the national
interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of
authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in
this division for fiscal year 2015 between any such
authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions
thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be
merged with and be available for the same purposes as the
authorization to which transferred.
(2) Limitation.--Except as provided in paragraph (3), the
total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may
transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed
$4,000,000,000.
(3) Exception for transfers between military personnel
authorizations.--A transfer of funds between military
personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted
toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).
(b) Limitations.--The authority provided by subsection (a)
to transfer authorizations--
(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that
have a higher priority than the items from which authority is
transferred; and
(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that
has been denied authorization by Congress.
(c) Effect on Authorization Amounts.--A transfer made from
one account to another under the authority of this section
shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the
account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal
to the amount transferred.
(d) Notice to Congress.--The Secretary shall promptly
notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

SEC. 1002. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDITS
OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Section 1008 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107-107; 115 Stat. 1204; 10
U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking subsection (d).

SEC. 1003. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE NATIONAL
NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO SUSTAIN
NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION AND NAVAL
REACTORS.

(a) Transfer Authorized.--If the amount authorized to be
appropriated for the weapons activities of the National
Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 is less than
$8,700,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such
activities in fiscal year 2015 as specified in the report
under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2549)),
the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense
for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary
of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be
available only for naval reactors or weapons activities of
the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(b) Notice to Congress.--In the event of a transfer under
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly
notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such
notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from
which funds are transferred.
(c) Transfer Mechanism.--Any funds transferred under this
section shall be transferred in accordance with established
procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor
provisions of law.
(d) Construction of Authority.--The transfer authority
provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other
transfer authority provided under this Act.

SEC. 1004. MANAGEMENT OF DEFENSE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SYSTEMS.

(a) In General.--Section 2222 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 2222. Management of Defense information technology
systems

``(a) Conditions for Obligation of Funds for Covered
Defense Information Technology System Programs.--Funds
available to the Department of Defense, whether appropriated
or non-appropriated, may not be obligated for a defense
information technology system program that will have a total
cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the period of the current
future-years defense program submitted to Congress under
section 221 of this title unless--
``(1) the appropriate pre-certification authority for the
covered defense information technology system program has
determined that--
``(A) the defense information technology system program is
in compliance with the enterprise architecture developed
under subsection (b) and appropriate business process re-
engineering efforts have been undertaken to ensure that--
``(i) the business process supported by the defense
information technology system program is or will be as
streamlined and efficient as practicable; and
``(ii) the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf systems
to meet unique requirements or incorporate unique
requirements or incorporate unique interfaces has been
eliminated or reduced to the maximum extent practicable;
``(B) the defense information technology system program is
necessary to achieve a critical national security capability
or address a critical requirement in an area such as safety
or security; or
``(C) the defense information technology system program is
necessary to prevent a significant adverse effect on a
project that is needed to achieve an essential capability,
taking into consideration the alternative solutions for
preventing such adverse effect; and
``(2) the covered defense information technology system
program has been reviewed and certified by the investment
review board established under subsection (e).
``(b) Enterprise Architecture for Defense Information
Technology Systems.--(1) The Secretary of Defense shall
develop an enterprise architecture, known as the joint
information technology enterprise architecture, to cover all
defense information technology systems, and the functions and
activities supported by defense information technology
systems, which shall be sufficiently defined to effectively
guide, constrain, and permit implementation of interoperable
defense information technology system solutions and
consistent with the policies and procedures established by
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
``(2) The Secretary of Defense shall delegate
responsibility and accountability for the defense information
technology enterprise architecture content, including
unambiguous definitions of functional processes, business
rules, and standards, as follows:
``(A) For the warfighting mission area, the Joint Staff
shall be responsible and accountable for the content of those
portions of the defense information systems enterprise
architecture.
``(B) For the business systems mission area, the Deputy
Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall
be responsible and accountable for the content of those
portions of the defense information technology enterprise
architecture.
``(C) For the Enterprise Information environment mission
area, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense shall be responsible and accountable for the content
of those portions of the defense information technology
enterprise architecture.
``(c) Composition of Enterprise Architecture.--The defense
information technology enterprise architecture developed
under subsection (b)(1)(A) shall include the following:
``(1) An information infrastructure that, at a minimum,
would enable the Department of Defense to comply with all
applicable law.
``(2) Policies, procedures, data standards, performance
measures, and system interface requirements that are to apply
uniformly throughout the Department of Defense.
``(3) A target defense information technology systems
computing environment, compliant with the defense information
technology enterprise architecture, as determined by the
Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.
``(d) Designation of Appropriate Pre-certification
Authorities and Senior Officials.--For purposes of
subsections (a) and (e), the appropriate pre-certification
authority for a defense information technology system program
is as follows:
``(1) In the case of an Army program, the Secretary of the
Army.
``(2) In the case of a Navy program, the Secretary of the
Navy.
``(3) In the case of an Air Force program, the Secretary of
the Air Force.
``(4) In the case of a program of a Defense Agency, the
Director, or equivalent, of such Defense Agency, unless
otherwise approved by the Secretary of Defense.
``(5) In the case of a program that will support the
business processes of more than one military department or
Defense Agency, an appropriate pre-certification authority
designated by the Secretary of Defense.
``(e) Defense Information Technology System Investment
Review.--(1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish an
investment review board and investment management process to
review and certify the planning, design, acquisition,
development, deployment, operation, maintenance,
modernization, and project cost benefits and risks of covered
defense information technology systems programs. The
investment review board and investment management process so
established shall specifically address the requirements of
subsection (a).
``(2) The review of defense information technology systems
programs under the investment management process shall
include the following:
``(A) Review and approval by an investment review board of
each covered defense information technology system program
before the obligation of funds on the system in accordance
with the requirements of subsection (a).
``(B) Periodic review of all covered defense information
technology system programs, grouped in mission areas.
``(C) Representation on each investment review board by
appropriate officials from among the Office of the Secretary
of Defense, the armed forces, the combatant commands, the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Defense Agencies, including
representation from each of the following:
``(i) The appropriate pre-certification authority for the
defense information technology system under review.
``(ii) The appropriate senior official of the Department of
Defense for the functions and activities supported by the
defense information technology system under review.
``(iii) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Defense.
``(D) Use of threshold criteria to ensure an appropriate
level of review within the Department of Defense of, and
accountability for, defense information technology system
programs depending on scope, complexity, and cost.
``(E) Use of procedures for making certifications in
accordance with the requirements of subsection (a).
``(f) Budget Information.--In the materials that the
Secretary submits to Congress in support of the budget
submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31 for
fiscal year 2015 and fiscal years thereafter, the Secretary
of Defense shall include the following information:

[[Page H4581]]

``(1) Identification of each defense information technology
system program for which funding is proposed in that budget.
``(2) Identification of all funds, by appropriation,
proposed in that budget for each such program, including--
``(A) funds for current services (to operate and maintain
the system covered by such program); and
``(B) funds for information technology systems
modernization, identified for each specific appropriation.
``(3) For each such program, identification of the
appropriate pre-certification authority and senior official
of the Department of Defense designated under subsection (d).
``(4) For each such program, a description of each approval
made under subsection (a)(3) with regard to such program,
including--
``(A) specific milestones and actual performance against
specified performance measures, and any revision of such
milestones and performance measures; and
``(B) specific actions on the defense information
technology system programs submitted for certification under
such subsection.
``(5) Identification of any covered defense information
technology system program during the preceding fiscal year
that was not approved under subsection (a), and the reasons
for the lack of approval.
``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `enterprise architecture' has the meaning
given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44.
``(4) The terms `information system' and `information
technology' have the meanings given those terms in section
11101 of title 40.
``(5) The term `national security system' has the meaning
given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The item relating to section 2222
in the table of chapters at the beginning of chapter 131 of
such title is amended to read as follows:

``2222. Management of Defense information technology systems.''.

Subtitle B--Counter-Drug Activities

SEC. 1011. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT UNIFIED
COUNTERDRUG AND COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN
COLOMBIA.

(a) Extension.--Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005
(Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently
amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66), is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``2014'' and inserting
``2015''; and
(2) in subsection (c), by striking ``2014'' and inserting
``2015''.
(b) Notice to Congress on Assistance.--Not later than 15
days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the
Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by subsection (a)) using funds
available for fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice
setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the
types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and
the anticipated completion date and duration of the provision
of such assistance.

SEC. 1012. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR
COUNTERDRUG ACTIVITIES OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCIES.

Subsection (a) of section 1004 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510;10
U.S.C. 374 note), as most recently amended by section 1005 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112-81), is amended by striking ``During fiscal
years 2012 through 2014'' and inserting ``During fiscal years
2014 through 2017''.

SEC. 1013. SUBMITTAL OF BIANNUAL REPORTS ON USE OF FUNDS IN
THE DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG
ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE ACCOUNT ON THE
COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES AND THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN
RELATIONS OF THE SENATE.

Consistent with section 481(b) of the Foreign Assistance
Act (22 U.S.C. 2291b), section 1009(a) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112-239; 126 Stat. 1906) is amended by inserting ``, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives,
and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate'' after
``congressional defense committees''.

SEC. 1014. NATIONAL GUARD DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG
ACTIVITIES.

Section 112 of title 32, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
``(4) The operation of regionally located National Guard
Counter-drug Training Centers within the United States for
the purposes of providing counter-drug related training to
Federal, State, and local law enforcement personnel, as well
as for foreign law enforcement personnel participating in the
National Guard State Partnership Program.''; and
(2) in subsection (h)(1), by inserting ``and activities
that counter threats posed by local, State, and transnational
criminal organizations drug smuggling and associated illicit
activities within and on their borders, as'' after ``drug
demand reduction activities''.

SEC. 1015. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The stability and security of Mexico and the nations of
Central America have a direct impact on the stability and
security of the United States.
(2) Over the past decade, a ``balloon effect'' has pushed
increased violence and instability into Central America and
Mexico from South America.
(3) Drug cartels and transnational criminal organizations
have spread throughout the region, causing instability and
lack of rule of law in many nations.
(4) Illicit networks are used in a variety of illegal
activities including the movement of narcotics, humans,
weapons, and money.
(5) According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and
Crime, Honduras has the highest murder rate in the world with
92 murders per 100,000 people.
(6) Currently, Mexico is working to reduce violence created
by transnational criminal organizations and address issues
spurred by the emergence of internal self defense groups.
(7) United States Northern Command and United States
Southern Command lead the efforts of the Department of
Defense in combating illicit networking in Mexico and Central
America.
(8) To combat these destabilizing threats, through a
variety of authorities, the Department of Defense advises,
trains, educates, and equips vetted troops in Mexico and many
of the nations of Central America to build their militaries
and police forces, with an emphasis on human rights and
building partnership capacity.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Department of Defense should continue to focus on
combating illicit networking routes in Mexico and Central
America;
(2) United States Northern Command and United States
Southern Command should continue to work together to combat
the transnational nature of these threats; and
(3) the Department of Defense should increase its maritime,
aerial and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
assets in the region in order to reduce the amount of illicit
networking flowing into the United States.

Subtitle C--Naval Vessels and Shipyards

SEC. 1021. DEFINITION OF COMBATANT AND SUPPORT VESSEL FOR
PURPOSES OF THE ANNUAL PLAN AND CERTIFICATION
RELATING TO BUDGETING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL
VESSELS.

Section 231(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(4) The term `combatant and support vessel' means any
commissioned ship built or armed for naval combat or any
naval ship designed to provide support to combatant ships and
other naval operations. Such term does not include patrol
coastal ships, non-commissioned combatant craft specifically
designed for combat roles, or ships that are designated for
potential mobilization.''.

SEC. 1022. NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND.

(a) In General.--
(1) Establishment of fund.--Chapter 131 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2218 the
following new section:

``Sec. 2218a. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund

``(a) Establishment.--There is established in the Treasury
a fund to be known as the `National Sea-Based Deterrence
Fund'.
``(b) Administration of Fund.--The Secretary of Defense
shall administer the Fund consistent with the provisions of
this section.
``(c) Fund Purposes.--(1) Funds in the Fund shall be
available for obligation and expenditure only for the
advanced procurement or construction of nuclear-powered
strategic ballistic missile submarines.
``(2) Funds in the Fund may not be used for a purpose or
program unless the purpose or program is authorized by law.
``(d) Deposits.--There shall be deposited in the Fund all
funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal
years after fiscal year 2016 for the advanced procurement or
construction of nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile
submarines.
``(e) Expiration of Funds After 10 Years.--No part of an
appropriation that is deposited in the Fund pursuant to
subsection (d) shall remain available for obligation more
than 10 years after the end of the fiscal year for which
appropriated except to the extent specifically provided by
law.
``(f) Budget Requests.--Budget requests submitted to
Congress for the Fund shall separately identify the amount
requested for programs, projects, and activities for the
construction (including the design of vessels) of nuclear-
powered strategic ballistic missile submarines.
``(g) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `Fund' means the National Sea-Based
Deterrence Fund established by subsection (a).
``(2) The term `nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile
submarine' means any nuclear-powered submarine owned,
operated, or controlled by the Department of Defense with the
primary mission of launching nuclear-armed ballistic
missiles.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 2218 the following new item:

``2218a. National sea-based deterrence fund.''.

(b) Transfer Authority.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), and to the
extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of
Defense may transfer to the National Sea-Based Deterrence
Fund established by section 2218a of title 10, United States

[[Page H4582]]

Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), amounts not to exceed
$3,500,000,000 from unobligated funds authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal years 2014, 2015, or 2016 for the
Navy for shipbuilding and conversion, Navy, for the advanced
procurement or construction, purchase, or alteration of
nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile submarines. The
transfer authority provided under this paragraph is in
addition to any other transfer authority provided to the
Secretary of Defense by law.
(2) Availability.--Funds transferred to the National Sea-
Based Deterrence Fund pursuant to paragraph (1) shall remain
available for the same period for which the transferred funds
were originally appropriated.

SEC. 1023. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT THAT A QUALIFIED
AVIATOR OR NAVAL FLIGHT OFFICER BE IN COMMAND
OF AN INACTIVATED NUCLEAR-POWERED AIRCRAFT
CARRIER BEFORE DECOMMISSIONING.

Section 5942(a) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to command of a nuclear-
powered aircraft carrier that has been inactivated for the
purpose of permanent decommissioning and disposal.''.

SEC. 1024. LIMITATION ON EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS UNTIL
COMMENCEMENT OF PLANNING OF REFUELING AND
COMPLEX OVERHAUL OF THE U.S.S. GEORGE
WASHINGTON.

Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be
appropriated or otherwise made available under section 301 of
this Act for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for
fiscal year 2015 may be obligated or expended until the
Secretary of Defense obligates funds to commence the planning
and long lead time material procurement associated with the
refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. George
Washington (CVN-73).

SEC. 1025. SENSE OF CONGRESS RECOGNIZING THE ANNIVERSARY OF
THE SINKING OF U.S.S. THRESHER.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) U.S.S. Thresher was first launched at Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard on July 9, 1960.
(2) U.S.S. Thresher departed Portsmouth Naval Shipyard for
her final voyage on April 9, 1963, with a crew of 16
officers, 96 sailors, and 17 civilians.
(3) The mix of that crew reflects the unity of the naval
submarine service, military and civilian, in the protection
of the United States.
(4) At approximately 7:47 a.m. on April 10, 1963, while in
communication with the surface ship U.S.S. Skylark, and
approximately 220 miles off the coast of New England, U.S.S.
Thresher began her final descent.
(5) U.S.S. Thresher was declared lost with all hands on
April 10, 1963.
(6) In response to the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, the United
States Navy instituted new regulations to ensure the health
of the submariners and the safety of the submarines of the
United States.
(7) Those regulations led to the establishment of the
Submarine Safety and Quality Assurance program (SUBSAFE), now
one of the most comprehensive military safety programs in the
world.
(8) SUBSAFE has kept the submariners of the United States
safe at sea ever since as the strongest, safest submarine
force in history.
(9) Since the establishment of SUBSAFE, no SUBSAFE-
certified submarine has been lost at sea, which is a legacy
owed to the brave individuals who perished aboard U.S.S.
Thresher.
(10) From the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, there arose in the
institutions of higher education in the United States the
ocean engineering curricula that enables the preeminence of
the United States in submarine warfare.
(11) The crew of U.S.S. Thresher demonstrated the ``last
full measure of devotion'' in service to the United States,
and this devotion characterizes the sacrifices of all
submariners, past and present.
(b) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
(1) recognizes the 51st anniversary of the sinking of
U.S.S. Thresher;
(2) remembers with profound sorrow the loss of U.S.S.
Thresher and her gallant crew of sailors and civilians on
April 10, 1963; and
(3) expresses its deepest gratitude to all submariners on
``eternal patrol'', who are forever bound together by
dedicated and honorable service to the United States of
America.

SEC. 1026. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT OR
INACTIVATION OF TICONDEROGA CLASS CRUISERS OR
DOCK LANDING SHIPS.

(a) Limitation on the Availability of Funds.--Except as
otherwise provided in this section, none of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made
available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015
may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire,
inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing
ship.
(b) Cruiser Upgrades.--As provided by section 8107 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113-76),
the Secretary of the Navy shall begin the upgrade of two
cruisers during fiscal year 2015, including--
(1) hull, mechanical, and electrical upgrades; and
(2) combat systems modernizations.

Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

SEC. 1031. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE REWARDS FOR
COMBATING TERRORISM.

Section 127b(c)(3)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``September 30, 2014'' and inserting
``September 30, 2015''.

SEC. 1032. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY
FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE
DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL
STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

(a) In General.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated
or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may
be used during the period beginning on the date of the
enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to
construct or modify any facility in the United States, its
territories, or possessions to house any individual detained
at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment
in the custody or under the control of the Department of
Defense unless authorized by Congress.
(b) Exception.--The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not
apply to any modification of facilities at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(c) Individual Detained at Guantanamo Defined.--In this
section, the term ``individual detained at Guantanamo'' means
any individual located at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who--
(1) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of
the Armed Forces of the United States; and
(2) is--
(A) in the custody or under the control of the Department
of Defense; or
(B) otherwise under detention at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

SEC. 1033. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER
OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED
STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made
available to the Department of Defense may be used during the
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and
ending on December 31, 2015, to transfer, release, or assist
in the transfer or release to or within the United States,
its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or
any other detainee who--
(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed
Forces of the United States; and
(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department
of Defense.

Subtitle E--Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations

SEC. 1041. MODIFICATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY
FOR HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ASSISTANCE AND
STOCKPILED CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ASSISTANCE
PROGRAMS.

(a) Inclusion of Information About Insufficient Funding in
Annual Report.--Subsection (d)(3) of section 407 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended by inserting ``or insufficient
funding'' after ``such activities'';
(b) Definition of Stockpiled Conventional Munitions
Assistance.--Subsection (e)(2) of such section is amended--
(1) by striking ``and includes'' and inserting the
following: ``small arms, and light weapons, including man-
portable air-defense systems. Such term includes''; and
(2) by inserting before the period at the end the
following: ``, small arms, and light weapons, including man-
portable air-defense systems''.

SEC. 1042. AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT VOLUNTARY SERVICES OF LAW
STUDENTS AND PERSONS STUDYING TO BE PARALEGALS.

Section 1588(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(10) Internship or externship services provided by law
students or persons studying to be a paralegal, when such
services are provided under the direct supervision of an
attorney.''.

SEC. 1043. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TO
USE THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REIMBURSEMENT
RATE FOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PROVIDED TO
CERTAIN NON-DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENTITIES.

(a) Eligible Categories of Transportation.--Subsection (a)
of section 2642 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking
``The Secretary'' and inserting ``Subject to subsection (b),
the Secretary'';
(2) in paragraph (3)--
(A) by striking ``During the period beginning on October
28, 2009, and ending on September 30, 2019, for'' and
inserting ``For'';
(B) by striking ``of Defense'' the first place it appears
and all that follows through ``military sales'' and inserting
``of Defense''; and
(C) by striking ``, but only if'' and all that follows
through ``commercial transportation industry''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
``(4) For military transportation services provided in
support of foreign military sales.
``(5) For military transportation services provided to a
State, local, or tribal agency (including any organization
composed of State, local, or tribal agencies).
``(6) For military transportation services provided to a
Department of Defense contractor when transporting supplies
that are for, or destined for, a Department of Defense
entity.''.
(b) Termination of Authority for Certain Categories of
Transportation.--Such section is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsection (b):
``(b) Termination of Authority for Certain Categories of
Transportation.--The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5),
and (6) of subsection (a) shall apply only to military
transportation services provided before October 1, 2024.''.

[[Page H4583]]

``Sec. 2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-
Department of Defense agencies and entities: Use of
Department of Defense reimbursement rate''.

(2) Table of sections.--The item relating to such section
in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of
such title is amended to read as follows:

``2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of
Defense agencies and entities: Use of Department of
Defense reimbursement rate.''.

SEC. 1044. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY RELATING TO USE OF MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS BY CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET
CONTRACTORS.

(a) Repeal.--Section 9513 of title 10, United States Code,
is repealed.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 931 of such title is amended by striking
the item relating to section 9513.

SEC. 1045. CERTIFICATION AND LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF
FUNDS FOR AVIATION FOREIGN INTERNAL DEFENSE
PROGRAM.

(a) Certification.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a
certification regarding the aviation foreign internal defense
program that includes each of the following:
(A) An overall description of the program, included
validated requirements from each of the geographic combatant
commands and the Joint Staff, and statutory authorities used
to support fixed and rotary wing aviation foreign internal
defense programs within the Department of Defense.
(B) Program goals, proposed metrics of performance success,
and anticipated procurement and operation and maintenance
costs across the Future Years Defense Program.
(C) A comprehensive strategy outlining and justifying
contributing commands and units for program execution,
including the use of Air Force, Special Operations Command,
Reserve, and National Guard forces and components.
(D) The results of any analysis of alternatives and
efficiencies reviews for any contracts awarded to support the
aviation foreign internal defense program.
(E) Any other items the Secretary of Defense determines
appropriate.
(2) Form.--The certification required under paragraph (1)
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
(b) Limitations.--
(1) Limitations on the use of funds.--None of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made
available for fiscal year 2015 may be obligated or expended
to support the aviation foreign internal defense program, or
to retire, transfer, or divest any asset of such program,
until the date that is 45 days after the date on which the
Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense
committees the certification required under subsection (a).
(2) Limitation on disposition of aircraft.--No aircraft
that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is part of
the aviation foreign internal defense program may be
transferred into or maintained in a status that is considered
excess to the requirements of the possessing command and
awaiting disposition instructions.

SEC. 1046. SUBMITTAL OF PROCEDURES AND REPORT RELATING TO
SENSITIVE MILITARY OPERATIONS.

Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Office
of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations
and Low Intensity Conflict, not more than 75 percent may be
obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits
to the congressional defense committees--
(1) the procedures required to be submitted by section
130f(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code; and
(2) the report required to be submitted under section 1043
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 857).

SEC. 1047. LIMITATION ON USE OF RUSSIAN-FLAGGED AIRLIFT
AIRCRAFT TO SUPPORT THE AIRLIFT MOVEMENT
REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES
TRANSPORTATION COMMAND.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available to the Secretary of Defense for
fiscal year 2015 may be used to fly any Russian-flagged
airlift aircraft to support any airlift movement requirement
of the United States Transportation Command until the
commander of the United States Transportation Command
certifies to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate
and House of Representatives that with respect to the airlift
movement requirement, using the Russian-flagged airlift
aircraft is the only means available to the commander to
execute the requirement.

SEC. 1048. PROHIBITION ON REDUCTION OF FORCE STRUCTURE AT
LAJES AIR FORCE BASE UNTIL COMPLETION OF
ASSESSMENTS BY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE.

The Secretary of the Air Force may not reduce the force
structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, Portugal, below
the force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1,
2013, until 30 days after the following occur:
(1) The Secretary of Defense concludes the European
Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the
Secretary on January 25, 2013.
(2) The Secretary briefs the congressional defense
committees regarding such Assessment, including a specific
assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base in
supporting the United States overseas force posture.
(3) The Comptroller General of the United States reviews
and validates the results of such Assessment and conducts an
independent assessment of the possible operational
capabilities of Lajes Air Force Base.

SEC. 1049. LIMITATION ON REMOVAL OF C-130 AIRCRAFT.

The Secretary of the Air Force may not remove C-130
aircraft from a unit of the regular or reserve components of
the Air Force that is tasked with the modular airborne fire
fighting system mission, or from a unit that is formally
associated with a unit that is tasked with such mission,
until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force
certifies to the congressional defense committees that such
mission will not be negatively affected by the removal of
such aircraft.

SEC. 1050. CONDITIONS ON ARMY NATIONAL GUARD AND ACTIVE ARMY
FORCE STRUCTURE CHANGES PENDING COMPTROLLER
GENERAL REPORT.

(a) Certain Reductions Prohibited.--During fiscal year
2015, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army
may not carry out any of the following actions:
(1) Reduce the end strength for active duty personnel of
the Army for a fiscal year below 490,000.
(2) Reduce the end strength for Selected Reserve personnel
of the Army National Guard of the United States for a fiscal
year below 350,000.
(3) Transfer AH-64 Attack helicopters from the Army
National Guard to the regular Army.
(b) Report Required.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report containing a review
of the analyses of any counter-proposals submitted to the
Army by the Chief of the National Guard and conducted by the
Army and the Department of Defense Cost Assessment Program
Evaluation Office as the basis for the decision to determine
the future force structure of the Army, including the
appropriate mix between regular Army, the National Guard, and
the Army Reserve.
(c) Elements of Report.--The report required by subsection
(b) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) An assessment of the force structure model used to
conduct the analysis and determination of whether proper
assumptions were made based on the current budget program,
the National Military Strategy, and Combatant Commanders'
operational requirements for the Army.
(2) An assessment of the cost analysis models used to make
the determinations regarding which Army aviation platforms
should be retained and in which component, including the
projected costs and savings associated with the
determinations.
(3) A comparison of the operational readiness rates for the
past five years for the equipment platforms that comprise
aviation brigades of the regular Army and the Army National
Guard.
(4) An assessment of the manning levels required for combat
aviation brigades in the regular Army and the Army National
Guard, including whether the resources to fund full-time
support of military technicians was properly applied to fill
the authorized positions in States with aviation brigades.
(d) No Limitation on Aviation Training.--Nothing in
subsection (a) shall be construed--
(1) to limit the provision of qualification training for
military occupational specialties related to Army Aviation;
or
(2) to prevent the Secretary of the Army from continuing
flight training and advanced qualification courses for
selected National Guard AH-64 personnel in accordance with
current force structure and Army readiness requirements.
(e) Sense of Congress Regarding Additional Funding for the
Army National Guard.--Congress is concerned with the planned
reductions and realignments the Army has proposed with
respect to aviation realignment of combat aviation aircraft
in the Army National Guard as well as greater reductions in
active component end strength and brigade combat teams.

Subtitle F--Studies and Reports

SEC. 1061. PROTECTION OF DEFENSE MISSION-CRITICAL
INFRASTRUCTURE FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE AND
HIGH-POWERED MICROWAVE SYSTEMS.

(a) Certification Required.--Not later than June 1, 2015,
the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees certification that defense mission-
critical infrastructure requiring electromagnetic pulse
protection that receives power supply from commercial or
other non-military sources is protected from the adverse
effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic
pulse and high-powered microwave weapons.
(b) Form of Submission.--The certification required by
subsection (a) shall be submitted in classified form.
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``defense mission-critical infrastructure''
means Department of Defense infrastructure of defense
critical systems essential to project, support, and sustain
the Armed Forces and military operations worldwide.
(2) The term ``defense critical system'' means a primary
mission system or an auxiliary or supporting system--
(A) the operational effectiveness and operational
suitability of which are essential to the successful mission
completion or to aggregate residual combat capability; and
(B) the failure of which would likely result in the failure
to complete a mission.

[[Page H4584]]

SEC. 1062. RESPONSE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO
COMPROMISES OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Compromises of classified information cause
indiscriminate and long-lasting damage to United States
national security and often have a direct impact on the
safety of warfighters.
(2) In 2010, hundreds of thousands of classified documents
were illegally copied and disclosed across the Internet.
(3) Classified information has been disclosed in numerous
public writings and manuscripts endangering current
operations.
(4) In 2013, nearly 1,700,000 files were downloaded from
United States Government information systems, threatening the
national security of the United States and placing the lives
of United States personnel at extreme risk. The majority of
the information compromised relates to the capabilities,
operations, tactics, techniques, and procedures of the Armed
Forces of the United States, and is the single greatest
quantitative compromise in the history of the United States.
(5) The Department of Defense is taking steps to mitigate
the harm caused by these leaks.
(6) Congress must be kept apprised of the progress of the
mitigation efforts to ensure the protection of the national
security of the United States.
(b) Reports Required.--
(1) Initial report.--Not later than 60 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
actions taken by the Secretary in response to significant
compromises of classified information. Such report shall
include each of the following:
(A) A description of any changes made to Department of
Defense policies or guidance relating to significant
compromises of classified information, including regarding
security clearances for employees of the Department,
information technology, and personnel actions.
(B) An overview of the efforts made by any task force
responsible for the mitigation of such compromises of
classified information.
(C) A description of the resources of the Department that
have been dedicated to efforts relating to such compromises.
(D) A description of the plan of the Secretary to continue
evaluating the damage caused by, and to mitigate the damage
from, such compromises.
(E) A general description and estimate of the anticipated
costs associated with mitigating such compromises.
(2) Updates to report.--During calendar years 2015 through
2018, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees semiannual updates to the report required by
paragraph (1). Each such update shall include information
regarding any changes or progress with respect to the matters
covered by such report.

SEC. 1063. REPORT AND BRIEFING TO CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT AND
INSPECTION OF ARMORED COMMERCIAL PASSENGER-
CARRYING VEHICLES TO TRANSPORT CIVILIAN
EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) civilian employees of the Department of Defense should
be provided all reasonable protection while such employees
are in hostile foreign areas, and such protection should
include adequate armored commercial passenger-carrying
vehicle transportation; and
(2) to ensure adequate protection of civilian employees,
the Department of Defense should employ stringent, uniform
standards for the procurement and inspection upon delivery of
armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicles for use by
civilian employees overseas.
(b) Report Required.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense,
in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the policies and
procedures of the Department of Defense for procuring and
inspecting upon delivery armored commercial passenger-
carrying vehicles for transporting civilian employees. Such
report shall include--
(1) a description of the policies and procedures of the
Department of Defense at the time of the report for procuring
and inspecting upon delivery armored commercial passenger-
carrying vehicles for transporting civilian employees in
hostile or potentially hostile locations overseas;
(2) recommendations for any changes to such policies and
procedures of the Department of Defense that the Secretary
determines would increase the safety of civilian employees in
hostile or potentially hostile locations overseas; and
(3) any other relevant matter the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(c) Briefing Required.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense,
in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall provide to the
congressional defense committees a detailed briefing on the
report required by subsection (b).

SEC. 1064. STUDY ON JOINT ANALYTIC CAPABILITY OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

(a) Independent Assessment.--The Secretary of Defense shall
commission an independent assessment of the joint analytic
capabilities of the Department of Defense to support
strategy, plans, and force development and their link to
resource decisions.
(b) Conduct of Assessment.--The assessment required by
subsection (a) may, at the election of the Secretary, be
conducted by an independent, non-governmental institute which
is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such
Code, and has recognized credentials and expertise in
national security and military affairs appropriate for the
assessment.
(c) Elements.--The assessment required by subsection (a)
should include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) An assessment of the analytical capability of the
Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff to
support force planning, defense strategy development, program
and budget decisions, and the review of war plans.
(2) Recommendations on improvements to such capability as
required, including changes to processes or organizations
that may be necessary
(d) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the entity selected for the conduct of
the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to
the Secretary an unclassified report, with a classified annex
(if appropriate), containing its findings as a result of the
assessment. Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt
of the report, the Secretary shall transmit the report to the
congressional defense committees, together with such comments
on the report as the Secretary considers appropriate.

Subtitle G--Other Matters

SEC. 1071. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.

(a) Amendments To Title 10, United States Code, to Reflect
Enactment of Title 41, United States Code.--Title 10, United
States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Section 2013(a)(1) is amended by striking ``section
6101(b)-(d) of title 41'' and inserting ``section 6101 of
title 41''.
(2) Section 2302 is amended--
(A) in paragraph (7), by striking ``section 4 of such Act''
and inserting ``such section''; and
(B) in paragraph (9)(A)--
(i) by striking ``section 26 of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)'' and inserting
``chapter 15 of title 41''; and
(ii) by striking ``such section'' and inserting ``such
chapter''.
(3) Section 2306a(b)(3)(B) is amended by striking ``section
4(12)(C)(i) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act
(41 U.S.C. 403(12)(C)(i))'' and inserting ``section 103(3)(A)
of title 41''.
(4) Section 2314 is amended by striking ``Sections 6101(b)-
(d)'' and inserting ``Sections 6101''.
(5) Section 2321(f)(2) is amended by striking ``section
35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41
U.S.C. 431(c))'' and inserting ``section 104 of title 41''.
(6) Section 2359b(k)(4)(A) is amended by striking ``section
4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
403)'' and inserting ``section 110 of title 41''.
(7) Section 2379 is amended--
(A) in subsections (a)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A), and (c)(1)(B)(i),
by striking ``section 4(12) of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))'' and inserting
``section 103 of title 41''; and
(B) in subsections (b) and (c)(1), by striking ``section
35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41
U.S.C. 431(c))'' and inserting ``section 104 of title 41''.
(8) Section 2410m(b)(1) is amended--
(A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``section 7 of such
Act'' and inserting ``section 7104(a) of such title''; and
(B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ``section 7 of the
Contract Disputes Act of 1978'' and inserting ``section
7104(a) of title 41''.
(9) Section 2533(a) is amended by striking ``such Act'' in
the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting ``chapter 83
of such title''.
(10) Section 2533b is amended--
(A) in subsection (h)--
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking ``sections 34 and 35 of
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430
and 431)'' and inserting ``sections 1906 and 1907 of title
41''; and
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking ``section 35(c) of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))''
and inserting ``section 104 of title 41''; and
(B) in subsection (m)--
(i) in paragraph (2), by striking ``section 4 of the Office
of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)'' and
inserting ``section 105 of title 41'';
(ii) in paragraph (3), by striking ``section 4 of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)''
and inserting ``section 131 of title 41''; and
(iii) in paragraph (5), by striking ``section 35(c) of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))''
and inserting ``section 104 of title 41''.
(11) Section 2545(1) is amended by striking ``section 4(16)
of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
403(16))'' and inserting ``section 131 of title 41''.
(12) Section 7312(f) is amended by striking ``Section 3709
of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5)'' and inserting
``Section 6101 of title 41''.
(b) Amendments to Other Defense-related Statutes to Reflect
Enactment of Title 41, United States Code.--
(1) The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 846(a) (10 U.S.C. 2534 note) is amended--
(i) by striking ``the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et
seq.)'' and inserting ``chapter 83 of title 41, United States
Code''; and
(ii) by striking ``that Act'' and inserting ``that
chapter''.
(B) Section 866 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended--
(i) in subsection (b)(4)(A), by striking ``section 26 of
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
422)'' and inserting ``chapter 15 of title 41, United States
Code''; and
(ii) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking ``section 4(13)
of the Office of Federal Procurement

[[Page H4585]]

Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(13))'' and inserting ``section 110
of title 41, United States Code''.
(C) Section 893(f)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by
striking ``section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement
Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)'' and inserting ``chapter 15 of
title 41, United States Code''.
(2) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2008 (Public Law 110-181) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 805(c)(1) (10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended--
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``section 4(12)(E) of
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
403(12)(E))'' and inserting ``section 103(5) of title 41,
United States Code''; and
(ii) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking ``section 4(12)(F)
of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
403(12)(F))'' and inserting ``section 103(6) of title 41,
United States Code''.
(B) Section 821(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by
striking ``section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement
Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))'' and inserting ``section 103
of title 41, United States Code''.
(C) Section 847 (10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended--
(i) in subsection (a)(5), by striking ``section 27(e) of
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
423(e))'' and inserting ``section 2105 of title 41, United
States Code'';
(ii) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``section 4(16) of
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act'' and inserting
``section 131 of title 41, United States Code''; and
(iii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ``section 27 of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)''
and inserting ``chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code''.
(D) Section 862 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended--
(i) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``section 25 of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421)''
and inserting ``section 1303 of title 41, United States
Code''; and
(ii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ``section 6(j) of
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
405(j))'' and inserting ``section 1126 of title 41, United
States Code''.
(3) The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 832(d)(3) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by
striking ``section 8(b) of the Service Contract Act of 1965
(41 U.S.C. 357(b))'' and inserting ``section 6701(3) of title
41, United States Code''.
(B) Section 852(b)(2)(A)(ii) (10 U.S.C. 2324 note) is
amended by striking ``section 4(12) of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))'' and inserting
``section 103 of title 41, United States Code''.
(4) Section 8118 of the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-287; 10 U.S.C. 2533a
note), is amended by striking ``section 34 of the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430)'' and
inserting ``section 1906 of title 41, United States Code''.
(5) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2004 (Public Law 108-136) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 812(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2501 note) is amended by
striking ``section 6(d)(4)(A) of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(d)(4)(A))'' and
inserting ``section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States
Code''.
(B) Subsection (c) of section 1601 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is
amended--
(i) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``section 32A of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as added by section
1443 of this Act'' and inserting ``section 1903 of title 41,
United States Code''; and
(ii) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ``Subsections (a) and
(b) of section 7 of the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 (41 U.S.C.
57(a) and (b))'' and inserting ``Section 8703(a) of title 41,
United States Code''.
(6) Section 8025(c) of the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108-87; 10 U.S.C. 2410d
note), is amended by striking ``the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
(41 U.S.C. 46-48)'' and inserting ``chapter 85 of title 41,
United States Code''.
(7) Section 817(e)(1)(B) of the Bob Stump National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314;
10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking ``section
26(f)(5)(B) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act
(41 U.S.C. 422(f)(5)(B))'' and inserting ``section
1502(b)(3)(B) of title 41, United States Code''.
(8) Section 801(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107-107; 10 U.S.C. 2330
note) is amended by striking ``section 16(3) of the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))'' and
inserting ``section 1702(c) of title 41, United States
Code''.
(9) Section 803(d) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261;
10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking ``subsection
(b)(1)(B) of section 304A of the Federal Property and
Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 254b)'' and
inserting ``section 3503(a)(2) of title 41, United States
Code''.
(10) Section 848(e)(1) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85; 10
U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking ``section 32 of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 428)''
and inserting ``section 1902 of title 41, United States
Code''.
(11) Section 722(b)(2) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104-201;
10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking ``section 25(c)
of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
421(c))'' and inserting ``section 1303(a) of title 41, United
States Code''.
(12) Section 3412(k) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106, 10 U.S.C. 7420
note) is amended by striking ``section 303(c) of the Federal
Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C.
253(c))'' and inserting ``section 3304(a) of title 41, United
States Code''.
(13) Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103-160; 10 U.S.C. 2371
note) is amended--
(A) in subsection (a)(2)(A), by striking ``section 16(c) of
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
414(c))'' and inserting ``section 1702(c) of title 41, United
States Code,'';
(B) in subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii), by striking ``section
16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41
U.S.C. 414(3))'' and inserting ``section 1702(c) of title 41,
United States Code'';
(C) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking ``section 4(12) of
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
403(12))'' and inserting ``section 103 of title 41, United
States Code''; and
(D) in subsection (h), by striking ``section 27 of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)''
and inserting ``chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code''.
(14) Section 326(c)(2) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102-484;
10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking ``section 25(c)
of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C.
421(c))'' and inserting ``section 1303(a) of title 41, United
States Code''.
(15) Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law 102-190; 10 U.S.C.
2302 note) is amended--
(A) in subsection (b), by striking ``section 4(12) of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act'' and inserting
``section 103 of title 41, United States Code''; and
(B) in subsection (c)--
(i) by striking ``section 25(a) of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy Act'' and inserting ``section 1302(a) of
title 41, United States Code''; and
(ii) by striking ``section 25(c)(1) of the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c)(1))'' and
inserting ``section 1303(a)(1) of such title 41''.
(16) Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101-510, 10 U.S.C. 2302
note) is amended--
(A) by designating the subsection after subsection (k),
relating to definitions, as subsection (l); and
(B) in paragraph (8) of that subsection, by striking ``the
first section of the Act of June 25, 1938 (41 U.S.C. 46;
popularly known as the `Wagner-O'Day Act')'' and inserting
``section 8502 of title 41, United States Code''.
(c) Amendments to Title 10, United States Code, To Reflect
Reclassification of Provisions of Law Codified in Title 50,
United States Code.--Title 10, United States Code, is amended
as follows:
(1) Sections 113(b), 125(a), and 155(d) are amended by
striking ``(50 U.S.C. 401)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C.
3002)''.
(2) Sections 113(e)(2), 117(a)(1), 118(b)(1), 118a(b)(1),
153(b)(1)(C)(i), 231(b)(1), 231a(c)(1), and 2501(a)(1)(A) are
amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 404a)'' and inserting ``(50
U.S.C. 3043)''.
(3) Sections 167(g), 421(c), and 2557(c) are amended by
striking ``(50 U.S.C. 413 et seq.)'' and inserting ``(50
U.S.C. 3091 et seq.)''.
(4) Section 201(b)(1) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C.
403-6(b))'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3041(b))''.
(5) Section 429 is amended--
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ``Section 102A of the
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403-1)'' and
inserting ``section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947
(50 U.S.C. 3024)''; and
(B) in subsection (e), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))''
and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))''.
(6) Section 442(d) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C.
404e(a))'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3045(a))''.
(7) Section 444 is amended--
(A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 403o)''
and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3515)''; and
(B) in subsection (e)(2)(B), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 403a
et seq.)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)''.
(8) Section 457 is amended--
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 431)'' and
inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3141)''; and
(B) in subsection (c), by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 431(b))''
and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3141(b))''.
(9) Sections 462, 1599a(a), and 1623(a) are amended by
striking ``(50 U.S.C. 402 note)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C.
3614)''.
(10) Sections 491(c)(3), 494(d)(1), 496(a)(1), 2409(e)(1)
are amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))'' and inserting
``(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))''.
(11) Section 1605(a)(2) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C.
403r)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3518)''.
(12) Section 2723(d)(2) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C.
413)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3091)''.
(d) Amendments to Other Defense-Related Statutes To Reflect
Reclassification of Provisions of Law Codified in Title 50,
United States Code.--
(1) The following provisions of law are amended by striking
``(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C.
3003(4))'':
(A) Section 911(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383;
10 U.S.C. 2271 note).
(B) Sections 801(b)(3) and 911(e)(2) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law
110-181; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note; 2271 note).
(C) Section 812(e) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136; 10 U.S.C. 2501
note).

[[Page H4586]]

(2) Section 901(d) of the Bob Stump National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314;
10 U.S.C. 137 note) is amended by striking ``(50 U.S.C. 401
et seq.)'' and inserting ``(50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.)''.
(e) Date of Enactment References.--Title 10, United States
Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Section 1218(d)(3) is amended by striking ``on the date
that is five years after the date of the enactment of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010'' and
inserting ``on October 28, 2014''.
(2) Section 1566a(a) is amended by striking ``Not later
than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and under''
and inserting ``Under''.
(3) Section 2275(d) is amended--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``before the date of the
enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013'' and inserting ``before January 2, 2013'';
and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``on or after the date of
the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013'' and inserting ``on or after January 2,
2013''.
(4) Section 2601a(e) is amended by striking ``after the
date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012'' and inserting ``after December 31,
2011,''.
(5) Section 6328(c) is amended by striking ``on or after
the date of the enactment of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010'' and inserting ``on
or after October 28, 2009,''.
(f) Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code.--
Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is
amended by striking the item relating to section 130f and
inserting the following new item:

``130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations.''.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is
amended by inserting a period at the end of the item relating
to section 189.
(3) Section 189(c)(1) is amended by striking ``139c'' and
inserting ``2430(a)''.
(4) Section 407(a)(3)(A) is amended by striking the comma
after ``as applicable''.
(5) Section 429 is amended--
(A) in subsection (a), by striking ``Section'' in the
second sentence and inserting ``section''; and
(B) in subsection (c), by striking ``act'' and inserting
``law''.
(6) Section 674(b) is amended by striking ``afer'' and
inserting ``after''.
(7) Section 949i(b) is amended by striking ``,,'' and
inserting a comma.
(8) Section 950b(B)(2)(A) is amended by striking ``give''
and inserting ``given''.
(9) Section 1040(a)(1) is amended by striking ``..'' and
inserting a period.
(10) Section 1044(d)(2) is amended by striking ``..'' and
inserting a period.
(11) Section 1074m(a)(2) is amended by striking
``subparagraph'' in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and
inserting ``subparagraphs''.
(12) Section 1154(a)(2)(A)(ii) is amended by striking
``U.S.C.1411'' and inserting ``U.S.C. 1411''.
(13) Section 2222(g)(3) is amended by striking ``(A)''
after ``(3)''.
(14) Section 2335(d) is amended--
(A) by designating the last sentence of paragraph (2) as
paragraph (3); and
(B) in paragraph (3), as so designated--
(i) by inserting before ``each of'' the following paragraph
heading: ``Other terms.--''.
(ii) by striking ``the term'' and inserting ``that term'';
and
(iii) by striking ``Federal Campaign'' and inserting
``Federal Election Campaign''.
(15) Section 2430(c)(2) is amended by striking ``section
2366a(a)(4)'' and inserting ``section 2366a(a)(6)''.
(16) Section 2601a is amended--
(A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``issue'' and
inserting ``prescribe''; and
(B) in subsection (d), by striking ``issued'' and inserting
``prescribed''.
(17) Section 2853(c)(1)(A) is amended by striking ``can be
still be'' and inserting ``can still be''.
(18) Section 2866(a)(4)(A) is amended by striking
``repayed'' and inserting ``repaid''.
(19) Section 2884(c) is amended by striking ``on
evaluation'' in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and
inserting ``an evaluation''.
(20) Section 7292(d)(2) is amended by striking ``section
1024(a)'' and inserting ``section 1018(a)''.
(g) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014.--Effective as of December 23, 2013, and as if included
therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66) is amended as
follows:
(1) Section 2712 (127 Stat. 1004) is repealed.
(2) Section 2809(a) (127 Stat. 1013) is amended by striking
``subjection'' and inserting ``subsection''.
(3) Section 2966 (127 Stat. 1042) is amended in the section
heading by striking ``TITLE'' and inserting ``ADMINISTRATIVE
JURISDICTION''.
(4) Section 2971(a) (127 Stat. 1044) is amended--
(A) by striking ``the map'' and inserting ``the maps''; and
(B) by striking ``the mineral leasing laws, and the
geothermal leasing laws'' and inserting ``and the mineral
leasing laws''.
(5) Section 2972(d)(1) (127 Stat. 1045) is amended--
(A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``public'' before
``land''; and
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``public''.
(6) Section 2977(c)(3) (127 Stat. 1047) is amended by
striking ``; and'' and inserting a period.
(h) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013.--Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included
therein as enacted, section 604(b)(1) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 1774) is amended by striking ``on the date of the
enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013'' and inserting ``on January 2, 2013,''.
(i) Coordination With Other Amendments Made by This Act.--
For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of
this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this
section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately
before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act.

SEC. 1072. SALE OR DONATION OF EXCESS PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR
BORDER SECURITY ACTIVITIES.

Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``counter-drug and
counter-terrorism activities'' and inserting ``counterdrug,
counterterrorism, and border security activities''
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``the Attorney General
and the Director of National Drug Control Policy'' and
inserting ``the Attorney General, the Director of National
Drug Control Policy, and the Secretary of Homeland Security,
as appropriate.''; and
(2) in subsection (d), by striking ``counter-drug and
counter-terrorism activities'' and inserting ``counterdrug,
counterterrorism, or border security activities''.

SEC. 1073. REVISION TO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR AVIATION
INSURANCE CLAIMS.

(a) In General.--Section 44309 of title 49, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(2), by adding at the end the
following new sentence: ``A civil action shall not be
instituted against the United States under this chapter
unless the claimant first presents the claim to the Secretary
of Transportation and such claim is finally denied by the
Secretary in writing and notice of the denial of such claim
is sent by certified or registered mail.''.
(2) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following
new subsection (c):
``(c) Time Requirements.--(1) Except as provided under
paragraph (2), an insurance claim made under this chapter
against the United States shall be forever barred unless it
is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation
within two years after the date on which the loss event
occurred. Any civil action arising out of the denial of such
a claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the
date of the mailing, by certified or registered mail, of
notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary.
``(2)(A) For claims based on liability to persons with whom
the insured has no privity of contract, an insurance claim
made under the authority of this chapter against the United
States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in
writing to the Secretary of Transportation by not later than
the earlier of--
``(i) the date that is 60 days after the date on which
final judgment is entered by a tribunal of competent
jurisdiction; or
``(ii) the date that is six years after the date on which
the loss event occurred.
``(B) Any civil action arising out of the denial of such
claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the
date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice
of final denial of the claim by the Secretary.
``(3) A claim made under this chapter shall be deemed to be
administratively denied if the Secretary fails to make a
final disposition of the claim before the date that is 6
months after the date on which the claim is presented to the
Secretary, unless the Secretary makes a different agreement
with the claimant when there is good cause for an
agreement.''.
(b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a)
shall apply with respect to a claim arising after the date of
the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1074. PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE HUMAN TERRAIN SYSTEM.

(a) Pilot Program Required.--The Secretary of the Army
shall carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary
uses the Human Terrain System assets in the Pacific Command
area of responsibility to support phase 0 shaping operations
and the theater security cooperation plans of the Commander
of the Pacific Command.
(b) Limitation.--Not more than 12 full-time equivalent
personnel, or 12 full-time equivalent personnel for reach
back support, may be deployed into the Pacific command area
of responsibility to support the pilot program required by
subsection (a). The limitation under the preceding sentence
shall not apply to training or support functions required to
prepare personnel for participation in the pilot program.
(c) Reports.--
(1) Briefing.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall
provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on
the plan of the Secretary to carry out the program required
by subsection (a), including the milestones, metrics,
deliverables, and resources needed to execute such a pilot
program. In establishing the metrics for the pilot program,
the Secretary shall include the ability to measure the value
of the program in comparison to other analytic tools and
techniques.
(2) Initial report.--Not later than one year after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
the status of the pilot program. Such report shall include
the independent analysis and recommendations of the Commander
of the Pacific Command regarding the effectiveness of the
program and how it could be improved.

[[Page H4587]]

(3) Final report.--Not later than December 1, 2016, the
Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a final report on the pilot program. Such
report shall include an analysis of the comparative value of
human terrain information relative to other analytic tools
and techniques, recommendations regarding expanding the
program to include other combatant commands, and any
improvements to the program and necessary resources that
would enable such an expansion.
(d) Termination.--The authority to carry out a pilot
program under this section shall terminate on September 30,
2016.

SEC. 1075. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND NATIONAL AIRSPACE.

(a) Memoranda of Understanding.--Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may enter into a
memorandum of understanding with a non-Department of Defense
entity that is engaged in the test range program authorized
under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act
of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) to allow such entity to access
nonregulatory special use airspace if such access--
(1) is used by the entity as part of such test range
program; and
(2) does not interfere with the activities of the Secretary
or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of the
Department of Defense.
(b) Established Procedures.--The Secretary shall carry out
subsection (a) using the established procedures of the
Department of Defense with respect to entering into a
memorandum of understanding.
(c) Construction.--A memorandum of understanding entered
into under subsection (a) between the Secretary and a non-
Department of Defense entity shall not be construed as
establishing the Secretary as a partner, proponent, or team
member of such entity in the test range program specified in
such subsection.

SEC. 1076. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIFE AND ACHIEVEMENTS OF
DR. JAMES R. SCHLESINGER.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The Honorable Dr. James R. Schlesinger was born in New
York, New York, on February 15, 1929, graduated summa cum
laude from Harvard College in 1950 where he was elected Phi
Beta Kappa and awarded the Frederick Sheldon Travel
Fellowship, and subsequently received from Harvard University
his master's degree in 1952 and doctoral degree in 1956.
(2) Dr. Schlesinger married Rachel Line Mellinger in 1954
and had eight children with her before she passed away in
1995.
(3) Dr. Schlesinger is survived by his children Cora
Schlesinger, Charles Schlesinger, Ann Schlesinger, William
Schlesinger, Emily Schlesinger, Thomas Schlesinger, Clara
Schlesinger, and James Schlesinger, Jr., and eleven
grandchildren.
(4) Dr. Schlesinger was a generous patron of the arts,
including helping significantly to establish the Rachel M.
Schlesinger Concert Hall and Arts Center in Arlington,
Virginia.
(5) Dr. Schlesinger was a generous sponsor of higher
education, serving on the International Council at Harvard
University's Belfer Center, endowing the Julius Schlesinger
Professorship of Operations Management at New York
University's Stern School of Business and the James R.
Schlesinger Distinguished Professorship at the Miller Center
of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, and
sponsoring an ongoing music scholarship at Harvard College in
honor of his beloved wife.
(6) Dr. Schlesinger was a distinguished statesman-scholar
of great integrity, intellect, and insight who dedicated his
life to protecting the security of the United States and
Western civilization and the liberty of all the people of the
United States throughout his highly-decorated and
distinguished career spanning seven decades--
(A) serving as a professor of economics at the University
of Virginia from 1955 until 1963;
(B) authoring numerous important scholarly and policy-
related publications, including The Political Economy of
National Security: A Study of the Economic Aspect of the
Contemporary Power Struggle (1960), Defense Planning and
Budgeting: The Issue of Centralized Control (1968), American
Security and Energy Policy (1980), America at Century's End
(1989), and most recently, Minimum Deterrence: Examining the
Evidence (2013);
(C) serving at the RAND Corporation from 1963 until 1969,
including as the director of strategic studies;
(D) beginning service in the Federal Government in 1969,
leading on defense matters as the assistant director and
acting deputy director of the United States Bureau of the
Budget;
(E) serving as a member and chairman of the Atomic Energy
Commission from 1971 until 1973, working tirelessly to
introduce extensive organization and management changes to
strengthen the regulatory performance of the Commission;
(F) serving as Director of Central Intelligence in 1973,
focusing on the agency's adherence to its legislative
charter; and
(G) becoming the Secretary of Defense in 1973 at age 44, a
position Dr. Schlesinger held until 1975, during which time
he--
(i) authored the ``Schlesinger Doctrine'' that instituted
important reforms to strengthen the flexibility and
credibility of the United States nuclear deterrent to prevent
war, assure United States allies, and protect the liberties
all Americans enjoy; ensuring that the United States
maintained ``essential equivalence'' with the Soviet Union's
conventional military forces and surging nuclear
capabilities;
(ii) lead the successful development of the A-10 close-air
support aircraft and the F-16 fighter; leading the Department
of Defense with great skill and prescience during the 1973
Yom Kippur War in which he was key to the United States
airlift that, according to Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir,
``meant life for our people'';
(iii) led the Department of Defense during the 1974 Cyprus
Crisis, the closing phase of the Indochina conflict, and the
1975 Mayaguez incident in which his actions helped save the
lives of captured Americans,
(iv) consulted regularly with and was highly-regarded by
the uniformed military; and working tenaciously to strengthen
the morale of the military following the United States
withdrawal from Vietnam and to stem the defense budget cuts
in that challenging period.
(7) In light of his realistic views of the Soviet Union's
power and intentions, Dr. Schlesinger was invited to China as
a private citizen in 1975 at the personal request of Mao
Zedong, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party, and upon
Mao's death, was the only foreigner invited by the Chinese
leadership to lay a wreath at Mao's bier.
(8) In 1976, President-elect Jimmy Carter invited Dr.
Schlesinger to serve as his special advisor on energy during
the difficult period of oil embargoes and fuel shortages to
establish a national energy policy and create the charter for
the Department of Energy and subsequently to serve President
Carter as the first Secretary of Energy, successfully
initiating new conservation standards, gradual oil and
natural gas deregulation, and unifying the nation's approach
to energy policy with national security considerations.
(9) Following his return to private life in 1979, Dr.
Schlesinger continued serving tirelessly to the end of his
life in a wide array of public service and civic positions,
including as a member of President Ronald Reagan's Commission
on Strategic Forces, a member of Virginia Governor Charles
Robb's Commission on Virginia's Future, Chairman of the Board
of Trustees for the Mitre Corporation, a member of the
Defense Policy Board and co-chair of studies for the Defense
Science Board, Chairman of the National Space-Based
Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Board, a Director of
Sandia Corporation, a Trustee of the Atlantic Council, Nixon
Center, and Henry M. Jackson Foundation, and an original
member of the Secretary of State's International Security
Advisory Board.
(10) In the recent past, Dr. Schlesinger was appointed by
President George W. Bush to the Homeland Security Advisory
Board, invited by Secretary Robert Gates to lead the
``Schlesinger Task Force'' to recommend measures to ensure
the highest levels of competence and control of the Nation's
nuclear forces, and invited by Congress to serve as the Vice
Chairman of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic
Posture of the United States to produce the 2009 study,
entitled ``America's Strategic Posture'', which served as the
blueprint for the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review of the
Department of Defense.
(11) In addition to Dr. Schlesinger's earned doctorate from
Harvard University, he was awarded 13 honorary doctorates,
and was the recipient of numerous prestigious medals and
awards, including inter alia, the National Security Medal
presented by President Carter, the Defense Science Board's
Eugene G. Fubini Award, the United States Army Association's
George Catlett Marshall Medal, the Air Force Association's H.
H. Arnold Award, the Navy League's National Meritorious
Citation, the Society of Experimental Test Pilots' James H.
Doolittle Award, the Military Order of World Wars'
Distinguished Service Medal, the Air Force Association's
Lifetime Achievement Award, and the Henry M. Jackson
Foundation's Henry M. Jackson Award for Distinguished Public
Service.
(12) Dr. Schlesinger's monumental contributions to the
security and liberty of the nation and Western civilization,
and to the betterment of his local community should serve as
an example to all people of the United States.
(b) Sense of Congress.--Congress--
(1) has learned with profound sorrow and deep regret the
announcement of the death of the Honorable Dr. James R.
Schlesinger, former Secretary of Defense, Secretary of
Energy, and Director of Central Intelligence;
(2) honors the legacy of Dr. Schlesinger's commitment to
the liberty and security of this Nation and the Western
community of nations, the betterment of his local community,
and his loving family;
(3) extends its deepest condolences and sympathy to the
family, friends, and colleagues of Dr. Schlesinger who have
lost a beloved father, grandfather, and thoughtful leader;
(4) honors Dr. Schlesinger's wisdom, discernment,
scholarship, and dedication to a life of public service that
greatly benefitted his community, country, and Western
civilization;
(5) recognizes with great appreciation that while serving
as public servant under Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter,
Dr. Schlesinger contributed significantly, thoughtfully, and
directly to the betterment of United States policies and
practices in the areas of national defense, energy, and
intelligence;
(6) recognizes with great appreciation that after returning
to private life, Dr. Schlesinger continued to serve the
Nation selflessly until his passing through his numerous
bipartisan contributions to the reasoned public discourse of
issues and his leadership on numerous high-level studies
sponsored by the White House, the Department of Defense, the
Department of State, and the United States Congress;
(7) recognizes with great appreciation Dr. Schlesinger's
exemplary life guided by his commitment to the continuing
security and liberty of the United States, and by his honor,
duty, and devotion to country and family, scholarship, and
personal moral integrity; and
(8) expresses profound respect and admiration for Dr.
Schlesinger and his exemplary legacy of commitment to the
people of the United States, members of the Armed Forces, and
all those who help safeguard the Nation.

[[Page H4588]]

SEC. 1077. REFORM OF QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW.

(a) In General.--
(1) Reform.--Section 118 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 118. Defense Strategy Review

``(a) Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends
Report.--
``(1) Report required.--Each year following a year evenly
divisible by four, on the date on which the President submits
the budget for the next fiscal year to Congress under section
1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report (to be known as
the `Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends
Report') on United States national security interests and
threats and trends that could affect those interests. The
report shall be developed in full consultation with the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
``(2) Timeframes.--The report shall consider the following
three general timeframes:
``(A) Near-term (5 years).
``(B) Mid-term (10 to 15 years).
``(C) Far-term (20 years).
``(3) Contents of the report.--
``(A) The report required under this subsection shall
include a discussion of United States national security
interests consistent with the President's most recently
submitted National Security Strategy prescribed by the
President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043).
``(B) The report required under this subsection shall
include a discussion of the current and future security
environment, including assessed threats, trends, and possible
developments that could affect the national security
interests of the United States. Such areas of discussion
shall include, at a minimum--
``(i) geopolitical changes;
``(ii) military capabilities;
``(iii) technology developments;
``(iv) demographic changes; and
``(v) other trends the Secretary considers to be
significant.
``(C) The report required under this subsection shall
include a list of current and possible future threats to
United States national security interests. The threats
included in the list shall be categorized by their
likelihood, imminence, and potential severity, and shall
include only those threats the Department of Defense would
likely have a role in preventing, combating, or otherwise
addressing.
``(4) Form.--The report required under this subsection
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
``(b) National Defense Panel.--
``(1) Establishment.--Not later than February 1 of a year
following a year evenly divisible by four, there shall be
established an independent panel to be known as the National
Defense Panel (in this subsection referred to as the
`Panel'). The Panel shall have the duties set forth in this
subsection.
``(2) Membership.--The Panel shall be composed of ten
members from private civilian life who are recognized experts
in matters relating to the national security of the United
States. Eight of the members shall be appointed as follows:
``(A) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed
Services of the House of Representatives.
``(B) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed
Services of the Senate.
``(C) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed
Services of the House of Representatives.
``(D) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed
Services of the Senate.
``(3) Co-chairs of the panel.--In addition to the members
appointed under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall
appoint two members from private civilian life to serve as
co-chairs of the panel.
``(4) Period of appointment; vacancies.--Members shall be
appointed for the life of the Panel. Any vacancy in the Panel
shall be filled in the same manner as the original
appointment.
``(5) Duties.--
``(A) Quadrennial national security threats and trends
report.--The Panel shall have the following duties with
respect to a quadrennial national security threats and trends
report submitted under subsection (a):
``(i) Review the report and suggest additional threats,
trends, developments, opportunities, and challenges that
should be addressed in the Defense Strategy Review required
under subsection (c).
``(ii) Discuss the role of the United States in the world,
with particular attention to the role of the United States
military and the Department of Defense, including a
prioritized list of United States national security
interests.
``(iii) Outline a defense strategy to address the threats,
trends, developments, opportunities, and challenges suggested
under clause (i), in particular discussing prioritized ends
and ways and means to address the threats so outlined.
``(iv) Determine the kind and degree of risk that is
acceptable to the United States in undertaking the various
military missions under the strategy outlined in clause (iii)
and discuss ways of mitigating such risk.
``(v) Provide to Congress and the Secretary of Defense, in
the report required by paragraph (7), any recommendations it
considers appropriate for their consideration.
``(B) Defense strategy review.--The Panel shall have the
following duties with respect to a Defense Strategy Review
conducted under subsection (c):
``(i) Assess the report on the Defense Strategy Review
submitted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection
(c)(3).
``(ii) Assess the assumptions, strategy, findings, and
risks of the report on the Defense Strategy Review submitted
under subsection (c)(3).
``(iii) Consider alternative defense strategies.
``(iv) Consider alternatives in force structure and
capabilities, presence, infrastructure, readiness, personnel
composition and skillsets, organizational structures, budget
plans, and other elements of the defense program of the
United States to execute successfully the full range of
missions called for in the Defense Strategy Review and in the
alternative strategies considered under clause (iii).
``(v) Provide to Congress and the Secretary of Defense, in
the report required by paragraph (7), any recommendations it
considers appropriate for their consideration.
``(6) First meeting.--If the Secretary of Defense has not
made the Secretary's appointments to the Panel under
paragraph (3) by March 1 of a year in which a quadrennial
national security threats and trends report is submitted
under this section, the Panel shall convene for its first
meeting with the remaining members.
``(7) Reports.--
``(A) Not later than July 1 of a year in which a Panel is
established under paragraph (1), the Panel shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the Panel's
review of the quadrennial national security threats and
trends report, as required by paragraph (5)(A).
``(B) Not later than three months after the date on which
the report on a Defense Strategy Review is submitted under
subsection (c), the Panel shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the Panel's assessment of such
Defense Strategy Review, as required by paragraph (5)(B).
``(8) Administrative provisions.--
``(A) The Panel may request directly from the Department of
Defense and any of its components such information as the
Panel considers necessary to carry out its duties under this
subsection. The head of the department or agency concerned
shall cooperate with the Panel to ensure that information
requested by the Panel under this paragraph is promptly
provided to the maximum extent practical.
``(B) Upon the request of the co-chairs, the Secretary of
Defense shall make available to the Panel the services of any
federally funded research and development center that is
covered by a sponsoring agreement of the Department of
Defense.
``(C) The Panel shall have the authorities provided in
section 3161 of title 5 and shall be subject to the
conditions set forth in such section.
``(D) Funds for activities of the Panel shall be provided
from amounts available to the Department of Defense.
``(9) Termination.--A Panel established under paragraph (1)
shall terminate 45 days after the date on which the Panel
submits its report on a Defense Strategy Review under
paragraph (7)(B).
``(c) Defense Strategy Review.--
``(1) Review required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
every four years, during a year following a year evenly
divisible by four, conduct a comprehensive examination (to be
known as a `Defense Strategy Review') of the national defense
strategy, force structure, force modernization plans,
infrastructure, budget plan, and other elements of the
defense program and policies of the United States with a view
toward determining and expressing the defense strategy of the
United States and establishing a defense program. Each such
Defense Strategy Review shall be conducted in consultation
with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
``(2) Conduct of review.--Each Defense Strategy Review
shall be conducted so as to--
``(A) delineate a national defense strategy consistent with
the most recent National Security Strategy prescribed by the
President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043);
``(B) provide the mechanism for--
``(i) setting priorities, shaping the force, guiding
capabilities and resources, and adjusting the organization of
the Department of Defense to respond to changes in the
strategic environment;
``(ii) ensuring that entities within the Department of
Defense are working toward common goals; and
``(iii) engaging Congress, other United States Government
stakeholders, allies and partners, and the private sector on
such strategy;
``(C) provide a bridge between higher-level policy and
strategy and other Department of Defense guidance and
activities;
``(D) consider three general timeframes of the near-term
(associated with the future-years defense program), mid-term
(10 to 15 years), and far-term (20 years);
``(E) address the security environment, threats, trends,
opportunities, and challenges;
``(F) define the force structure and capabilities, force
modernization plans, presence, infrastructure, readiness,
personnel composition and skillsets, organizational
structures, and other elements of the defense program of the
United States associated with that national defense strategy
that would be required to execute successfully the full range
of missions called for in that national defense strategy;
``(G) identify the budget plan that would be required to
provide sufficient resources to execute successfully the full
range of missions called for in that national defense
strategy;
``(H) define the nature and magnitude of the strategic and
operational risks associated with executing the national
defense strategy; and
``(I) understand the relationships and tradeoffs between
missions, risks, and resources.
``(3) Submission of report on defense strategy review to
congressional committees.--The Secretary shall submit a
report on each Defense Strategy Review to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives. The report shall be submitted not later than
March 1 of the year following the year in which the review is
conducted. If the year in which the review is conducted is in
the second term of a President, the

[[Page H4589]]

Secretary may submit an update to the Defense Strategy Review
report submitted during the first term of that President.
``(4) Elements.--The report shall provide a comprehensive
discussion of the Review, including the following:
``(A) The national defense strategy of the United States.
``(B) The assumed or defined prioritized national security
interests of the United States that inform the national
defense strategy defined in the Review.
``(C) The assumed strategic environment, including the
threats, developments, trends, opportunities, and challenges
that affect the assumed or defined national security
interests of the United States, including those that were
examined for the purposes of the Review and those that were
considered in the development of the Quadrennial National
Security Threats and Trends Report required under subsection
(a).
``(D) The assumed steady state activities, crisis and
conflict scenarios, military end states, and force planning
construct examined in the review.
``(E) The prioritized missions of the armed forces under
the strategy and a discussion of the roles and missions of
the components of the armed forces to carry out those
missions.
``(F) The assumed roles and capabilities provided by other
United States Government agencies and by allies and partners.
``(F) The force structure and capabilities, presence,
infrastructure, readiness, personnel composition and
skillsets, organizational structures, and other elements of
the defense program that would be required to execute
successfully the full range of missions called for in the
strategy.
``(G) An assessment of the gaps and shortfalls between the
force structure, capabilities, and additional elements as
required by subparagraph (F) and the current elements in the
Department's existing program of record, and a prioritization
of those gaps and shortfalls.
``(H) An assessment of the risks assumed by the strategy,
including--
``(i) how the Department defines, categorizes, and measures
risk, such as strategic and operational risk; and
``(ii) the plan for mitigating major identified risks,
including the expected timelines for, and extent of, any such
mitigation, and the rationale for where greater risk is
accepted.
``(I) A sensitivity analysis, specifically to understand
the relationships and tradeoffs between missions, risks, and
resources.
``(J) Any other key assumptions and elements addressed in
the review or that the Secretary considers necessary to
include.
``(5) CJCS review.--(A) Upon the completion of each Review
under this subsection, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff shall prepare and submit to the Secretary of Defense
the Chairman's assessment of risks under the defense strategy
developed by the Review and a description of the capabilities
needed to address such risk. In preparing such assessment,
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall consider the
threats and trends contained in the Quadrennial National
Security Threats and Trends Report required by subsection
(a), any additional threats considered as part of the Review
under this subsection (particularly those that are
categorized as likely, imminent, or severe), and any
additional threats the Chairman considers appropriate.
``(B) The Chairman's assessment shall be submitted to the
Secretary in time for the inclusion of the assessment in the
report on the Review under this subsection. The Secretary
shall include the Chairman's assessment, together with the
Secretary's comments, in the report in its entirety.
``(6) Form.--The report required under this subsection
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The item relating to section 118
at the beginning of chapter 2 of such title is amended to
read as follows:
``118. Defense Strategy Review.''.
(b) Repeal of Quadrennial Roles and Missions Review.--
(1) Repeal.--Chapter 2 of such title is amended by striking
section 118b.
(2) Conforming amendment.--The table of sections at the
beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item
relating to section 118b.
(c) Effective Date.--Section 118 of such title, as amended
by subsection (a), and the amendments made by this section,
shall take effect on October 1, 2015.

SEC. 1078. RESUBMISSION OF 2014 QUADRENNIAL DEFENSE REVIEW.

(a) Requirement to Resubmit 2014 QDR.--Not later than
October 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation
with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall, in
accordance with this section, resubmit to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives
the report on the 2014 quadrennial defense review that was
submitted to such committees as required by section 118(d) of
title 10, United States Code,
(b) Matters Covered.--The resubmitted report shall fully
address the elements required in subsections (a), (b)(3), and
(b)(4) of section 118 of such title, which specifically
include the following:
(1) An articulation of a defense program for the next 20
years, consistent with the national defense strategy of the
United States determined and expressed in the 2014
quadrennial defense review.
(2) An identification of (A) the budget plan that would be
required to provide sufficient resources to execute
successfully the full range of missions called for in that
national defense strategy at a low-to-moderate level of risk,
and (B) any additional resources (beyond those programmed in
the current future-years defense program) required to achieve
such a level of risk.
(3) Recommendations that are not constrained to comply with
and are fully independent of the budget submitted to Congress
by the President pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United
States Code.
(c) Limitation on Funds.--Of the amounts authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2015 for the Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Policy, not more than 75 percent may be obligated
or expended until the Secretary of Defense resubmits to the
congressional defense committees the 2014 quadrennial defense
report in accordance with this section.

SEC. 1079. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING COUNTER-IMPROVISED
EXPLOSIVE DEVICES.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) counter-improvised explosive device tactics,
techniques, and procedures used in Iraq and Afghanistan have
produced important technical data, lessons learned, and
enduring technology critical to mitigating the devastating
effects of improvised explosive devices, which have been the
leading cause of combat fatalities in the United States
Central Command area of operations since 2002, and whose use
are now expanding to other Global Combatant Commands area of
operations;
(2) without the preservation of knowledge about counter-
improvised explosive devices, the Nation could fail to take
full advantage of the hard earned lessons and investments of
the past decade of counter-improvised explosive device
operations to enhance warfighter readiness; and
(3) the Department of Defense should remain dedicated to
retaining a knowledge base relating to counter-improvised
explosive devices to ensure lessons learned and investments
are maximized for future benefits.

SEC. 1080. ENHANCING PRESENCE AND CAPABILITIES AND READINESS
POSTURE OF UNITED STATES MILITARY IN EUROPE.

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a plan that--
(1) identifies the capabilities and capacities, including
with respect to cyber, special operations, and intelligence,
required by the Armed Forces of the United States to counter
or mitigate conventional, unconventional, and subversive
activities of the Russian Federation within the area of
responsibility of the United States European Command;
(2) identifies the required capabilities and capacities
needed by the Armed Forces of the United States to meet
operations plan requirements for a response under Article 5
of the North Atlantic Treaty;
(3) identifies any deficiencies in the readiness of the
Armed Forces of the United States in the area of the
responsibility of the United States European Command; and
(4) recommends actions, resources, and timelines with
respect to correcting any deficiency identified under
paragraphs (1), (2), or (3).

SEC. 1081. DETERMINATION AND DISCLOSURE OF TRANSPORTATION
COSTS INCURRED BY THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR
CONGRESSIONAL TRIPS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

(a) Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary.--In
the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of
the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out
official duties outside the United States for which the
Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary
of Defense shall--
(1) determine the cost of the transportation provided with
respect to the Member, officer, or employee;
(2) not later than 10 days after completion of the trip
involved, provide a written statement of the cost--
(A) to the Member, officer, or employee involved, and
(B) to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member,
officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed
Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a
Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and
(3) upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2),
make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary's
official public website until the expiration of the 4-year
period which begins on the final day of the trip involved.
(b) Exceptions.--This section does not apply with respect
to any trip the sole purpose of which is to visit one or more
United States military installations or to visit United
States military personnel in a war zone (or both).
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Member.--The term ``Member'', with respect to the House
of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident
Commissioner to the Congress.
(2) United states.--The term ``United States'' means the
several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any
other territory or possession of the United States.
(d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect
to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this
Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to
any trip which began prior to such date.

[[Page H4590]]

TITLE XI--CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

SEC. 1101. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL
LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE
LIMITATION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN
EMPLOYEES WORKING OVERSEAS.

Effective January 1, 2015, section 1101(a) of the Duncan
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently
amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66), is further
amended by striking ``through 2014'' and inserting ``through
2015''.

SEC. 1102. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO
GRANT ALLOWANCES, BENEFITS, AND GRATUITIES TO
PERSONNEL ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN A COMBAT ZONE.

Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War
on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234;
120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009
(Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently
amended by section 1102 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66), is further
amended by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2016''.

SEC. 1103. REVISION TO LIST OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
REINVENTION LABORATORIES.

Section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2487; 10
U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
``(18) The Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and
Social Sciences.
``(19) The Space and Missile Defense Command Technical
Center.''.

SEC. 1104. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR EXPERIMENTAL PERSONNEL
PROGRAM FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.

(a) In General.--Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999
(Public Law 105-261; 5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended by
striking subsections (e), (f) and (g).
(b) Conforming Amendments.--Such section is further
amended--
(1) in the section heading, by striking ``experimental''
and inserting ``alternative'';
(2) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``During the program period specified in
subsection (e)(1), the'' and inserting ``The''; and
(B) by striking ``experimental''; and
(3) in subsection (d)(1)--
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking
``12-month period'' and inserting ``calendar year''; and
(B) in subparagraph (A), striking ``fiscal year'' and
inserting ``calendar year''.

SEC. 1105. TEMPORARY AUTHORITIES FOR CERTAIN POSITIONS AT
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING
FACILITIES.

Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
``(3) Students enrolled in scientific and engineering
programs.--The director of any STRL may appoint qualified
candidates enrolled in a program of undergraduate or graduate
instruction leading to a bachelor's or master's degree in a
scientific, technical, engineering or mathematical course of
study at an institution of higher education (as that term is
defined in section 101 and 102 of the Higher Education Act of
1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) to positions described in paragraph
(3) of subsection (b) as an employee in a laboratory
described in that paragraph without regard to the provisions
of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code
(other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title).'';
(2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:
``(3) Candidates enrolled in scientific and engineering
programs.--The positions described in this paragraph are
scientific and engineering positions that may be temporary or
term in any laboratory designated by section 1105(a) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a
Department of Defense science and technology reinvention
laboratory.''; and
(3) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following:
``(3) In the case of a laboratory described in subsection
(b)(3), with respect to appointment authority under
subsection (a)(3), the number equal to 5 percent of the total
number of scientific and engineering positions in such
laboratory that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year
last ending before the start of such calendar year.''.

SEC. 1106. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
DECISIONS RELATING TO WHISTLEBLOWERS.

(a) In General.--Section 7703(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United
States Code, is amended by striking ``2-year'' and inserting
``5-year''.
(b) Director Appeal.--Section 7703(d)(2) of such title is
amended by striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``5-year''.

TITLE XII--MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

Subtitle A--Assistance and Training

SEC. 1201. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY
FUND.

(a) Revisions to Global Security Contingency Fund.--
Subsection (c)(1) of section 1207 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended by striking
``the provision of equipment, supplies, and training.'' and
inserting the following: ``the provision of the following:
``(A) Equipment.
``(B) Supplies.
``(C) With respect to amounts in the Fund appropriated or
transferred into the Fund after the date of the enactment of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015,
small-scale construction not exceeding $750,000 on a per-
project basis.
``(D) Training.''.
(b) Availability of Funds.--Subsection (i) of such section
is amended--
(1) by striking ``Amounts'' and inserting the following:
``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2),
amounts'';
(2) by striking ``September 30, 2015'' and inserting
``September 30, 2016''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(2) Exception.--Amounts appropriated or transferred to
the Fund before the date of the enactment of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 shall remain
available for obligation and expenditure after September 30,
2015, only for activities under programs commenced under
subsection (b) before September 30, 2015.''.
(c) Expiration.--Subsection (p) of such section, as amended
by section 1202(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 894), is
further amended--
(1) by striking ``September 30, 2015'' and inserting
``September 30, 2016'';
(2) by striking ``fiscal years 2012 through 2015'' and
inserting ``fiscal years 2012 through 2016''; and
(3) by adding at the end before the period the following:
``and subject to the requirements contained in paragraphs (1)
and (2) of subsection (i)''.

SEC. 1202. NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON CERTAIN ASSISTANCE UNDER
AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE THE
CAPABILITY OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO RESPOND TO
INCIDENTS INVOLVING WEAPONS OF MASS
DESTRUCTION.

Section 1204(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 896; 10
U.S.C. 401 note) is amended by inserting after
``congressional defense committees'' the following: ``and the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives''.

SEC. 1203. ENHANCED AUTHORITY FOR PROVISION OF SUPPORT TO
FOREIGN MILITARY LIAISON OFFICERS OF FOREIGN
COUNTRIES WHILE ASSIGNED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE.

(a) Eligibility.--Subsection (a) of section 1051a of title
10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``involved in
a military operation'' and all that follows and inserting
``while such liaison officer is assigned temporarily to the
headquarters of a combatant command, component command, or
subordinate operational command of the United States.''.
(b) Limitations.--Such section, as so amended, is further
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (f); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new
subsection (d):
``(d) Limitations.--The number of liaison officers
supported under subsection (b)(1) may not exceed 60 at any
one time, and the amount of unreimbursed support for any such
liaison officer under that subsection in any fiscal year may
not exceed $200,000 (in fiscal year 2014 constant
dollars).''.
(c) Secretary of State Concurrence.--Such section, as so
amended, is further amended by inserting after subsection
(d), as added by subsection (b)(2) of this section, the
following new subsection (e):
``(e) Secretary of State Concurrence.--The authority of the
Secretary of Defense to provide administrative services and
support under subsection (a) for the performance of duties by
a liaison officer of another nation may be exercised only
with respect to a liaison officer of another nation whose
assignment as described in that subsection is accepted by the
Secretary of Defense with the concurrence of the Secretary of
State.''.
(d) Definition.--Subsection (f) of such section, as
redesignated by subsection (d)(1) of this section, is further
amended by inserting ``training programs conducted to
familiarize, orient, or certify liaison officers regarding
unique aspects of the assignments of the liaison officers,''
after ``police protection,''.
(e) Annual Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later January 31, 2016, January 31,
2017, and January 31, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report that
includes a summary of the expenses, by command and associated
countries, incurred by the United States for those liaison
officers of a developing country in connection with the
assignment of that officer as described in subsection (a) of
section 1051(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended
by subsection (a) of this section.
(2) Definition.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall
also include the definition of and criteria established to
designate a country as a ``developing country'' for purposes
of such paragraph.
(3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in an unclassified form, but may contain a
classified annex.

SEC. 1204. ANNUAL REPORT ON HUMAN RIGHTS VETTING AND
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE.

(a) Report Required.--The Secretary of Defense, in
consultation with the Secretary of

[[Page H4591]]

State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees for each of the fiscal years 2015 through 2019 a
report on human rights vetting and verification procedures
used to comply with the requirements of section 8057 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113-76) or
any successor requirements.
(b) Matters to Be Included.--The report required by
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An accounting and description of all training,
equipment, or other assistance that was approved or provided
to foreign security forces for the prior fiscal year for
which such vetting and verification procedures were required,
itemized by country and event.
(2) An accounting and description of all training,
equipment, or other assistance that was not approved or
provided to foreign security forces for the prior fiscal year
by reason of not complying with such vetting and verification
procedures, itemized by country and event, including the
reasons for such non-compliance.
(3) A description of any human rights, rule of law
training, or other assistance that was provided to foreign
security forces described in paragraph (2) for the prior
fiscal year for purposes of seeking to comply with such
vetting and verification procedures in the future, itemized
by country and event.
(4) A description of any interagency processes that were
used to evaluate compliance with the requirements of section
8057 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 or any
successor requirements.
(5) In the event the Secretary of Defense exercises the
authority under subsection (b) or (c) of section 8057 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 or any successor
authority, a justification for the exercise of such authority
and an explanation of the specific benefits derived from the
exercise of such authority.
(6) Any additional items the Secretary of Defense
determines to be appropriate.
(c) Submission Requirements.--
(1) In general.--The report required by subsection (a)
shall be submitted to the appropriate congressional
committees at the same time as the budget of the President is
submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United
States Code.
(2) Form.--The report shall be submitted in unclassified
form and may include a classified annex if necessary.
(d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``appropriate
congressional committees'' means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

Subtitle B--Matters Relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan

SEC. 1211. EXTENSION OF COMMANDERS' EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PROGRAM IN AFGHANISTAN.

(a) One Year Extension.--Section 1201 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law
112-81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section
1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 904), is further
amended by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' each place it
appears and inserting ``fiscal year 2015''.
(b) Funds Available During Fiscal Year 2015.--Subsection
(a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by
striking ``for operation and maintenance'' and inserting ``by
section 1503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2015''.

SEC. 1212. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF
CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED
TO UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS.

(a) Extension of Authority.--Subsection (a) of section 1233
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently
amended by section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 905),
is further amended by striking ``fiscal year 2014 for
overseas contingency operations'' and inserting ``by section
1503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015''.
(b) Extension of Notice Requirement Relating to
Reimbursement of Pakistan for Support Provided by Pakistan.--
Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently
amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking ``September
30, 2014'' and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.
(c) Extension of Limitation on Reimbursement of Pakistan
Pending Certification on Pakistan.--Subsection (d) of section
1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2000) is amended--
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``in Fiscal Year
2013''; and
(2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Effective as of the
date of the enactment of this Act,'' and all that follows
through ``remain available for obligation'' and inserting
``No amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department
of Defense for fiscal year 2015 or any prior fiscal year''.

SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN AUTHORITIES FOR SUPPORT OF
FOREIGN FORCES SUPPORTING OR PARTICIPATING WITH
THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) Logistical Support for Coalition Forces Supporting
United States Military Operations in Afghanistan.--Section
1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 394), as most
recently amended by section 1217(a) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 909), is further amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' and
inserting ``fiscal year 2015'';
(2) in subsection (d), by striking ``December 31, 2014''
and inserting ``December 31, 2015''; and
(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``December 31, 2014''
and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.
(b) Use of Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements To
Lend Certain Military Equipment to Certain Foreign Forces for
Personnel Protection and Survivability.--Section 1202(e) of
the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2413), as most
recently amended by section 1217(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 909), is further amended by striking ``December 31,
2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.

SEC. 1214. REPORT ON PROGRESS TOWARD SECURITY AND STABILITY
IN AFGHANISTAN UNDER OPERATION RESOLUTE
SUPPORT.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2015, and
every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report on progress
toward security and stability in Afghanistan under the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Operation Resolute
Support.
(b) Matters to Be Included: Strategic Direction of United
States Activities Relating to Security and Stability in
Afghanistan Under Operation Resolute Support.--The report
required under subsection (a) shall include a description of
the mission and a comprehensive strategy of the United States
for security and stability in Afghanistan during Operation
Resolute Support, including any changes to the mission and
strategy over time. The description of such strategy shall
consist of a general overview and a separate detailed section
for each of the following:
(1) NATO.--The status of the train, advise, and assist
mission under NATO's Operation Resolute Support.
(2) ANSF.--A description of the following:
(A) The strategy and budget, with defined objectives, for
activities relating to strengthening and sustaining the
resources, capabilities, and effectiveness of the Afghanistan
National Army (ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP)
of the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF), with the
goal of ensuring that a strong and fully-capable ANSF is able
to independently and effectively conduct operations and
maintain security and stability in Afghanistan by the end of
Operation Resolute Support.
(B) Any actions of the United States and the Government of
Afghanistan to achieve the following goals relating to
sustaining the capacity of the ANSF and the results of such
actions:
(i) Improve and sustain ANSF recruitment and retention,
including through vetting and salaries for the ANSF.
(ii) Improve and sustain ANSF training and mentoring.
(iii) Strengthen the partnership between the Government of
the United States and the Government of Afghanistan.
(iv) Ensure international commitments to support the ANSF.
(3) NATO bases in afghanistan.--A description of the
following:
(A) The access arrangements, the specific locations, and
the force protection requirements for bases that the United
States has access to in Afghanistan.
(B) A summary of attacks against NATO bases or facilities
and any challenges to force protection, such as ``green-on-
blue'' attacks.
(4) Public corruption and rule of law.--A description of
any actions, and the results of such actions, by the United
States, NATO, and the Government of Afghanistan to fight
public corruption and strengthen governance and the rule of
law at the local, provincial, and national levels.
(5) Regional considerations.--A description of any actions
by the Government of Afghanistan to increase cooperation with
countries geographically located around Afghanistan's border,
with a particular focus on improving security and stability
in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border areas, and the status of
such actions.
(c) Matters to Be Included: Performance Indicators,
Measures of Progress, and Any Unfulfilled Requirements Toward
Sustainable Long-term Security and Stability in Afghanistan
Under Operation Resolute Support.--
(1) In general.--The report required under subsection (a)
shall set forth a comprehensive set of performance
indicators, measures of progress, and any unfulfilled
requirements toward sustainable long-term security and
stability in Afghanistan, as specified in paragraph (2), and
shall include performance standards and goals, together with
a notional timetable for achieving such goals.
(2) Performance indicators, measures of progress, and any
unfulfilled requirements specified.--The performance
indicators, measures of progress, and any unfulfilled
requirements specified in this paragraph shall include, at a
minimum, the following:
(A) An assessment of NATO train, advise, and assist mission
requirements. Such assessments shall include--
(i) indicators of the efficacy of the train, advise, and
assist mission, such as number of engagements with the ANSF
per day, a description of the engagements with the ANSF, and
trends in the marginal improvements in the functional areas
of the ANSF support structure from the tactical to the
ministerial level;
(ii) contractor support requirements for the train, advise,
and assist mission and for the ANSF; and

[[Page H4592]]

(iii) any unfulfilled requirements.
(B) For the ANA, and separately for the ANP, an assessment
and any changes over time for the following:
(i) Recruitment and retention numbers, rates of
absenteeism, rates and overall number of any desertions, ANSF
vetting procedures, and salary scale.
(ii) Numbers ANSF being trained and the type of training
and mentoring.
(iii) Operational readiness status of ANSF units, including
any changes to the type, number, size, and organizational
structure of ANA and ANP units.
(iv) A description of any gaps in ANSF capacity and
capability.
(v) Effectiveness of ANA and ANP senior officers and the
ANA and ANP chain of command.
(vi) An assessment of the extent to which insurgents have
infiltrated the ANA and ANP.
(vii) An assessment of the ANSF's ability to hold terrain
in Afghanistan and any posture changes in the ANSF such that
they no longer are providing coverage of certain areas in
Afghanistan that the ANSF was providing coverage of prior to
the reporting period.
(C) An assessment of the relative strength of the
insurgency in Afghanistan and the extent to which it is
utilizing weapons or weapons-related materials from countries
other than Afghanistan.
(D) A description of all terrorist and insurgent groups
operating in Afghanistan, including the number, size,
equipment strength, military effectiveness, and sources of
support.
(E) An assessment of security and stability, including
terrorist and insurgent activity, in Afghanistan-Pakistan
border areas and in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal
Areas from groups, including, al-Qaeda, the Haqqani Network,
and the Quetta Shura Taliban, and any attacks on NATO supply
lines.
(F) A description of the counterterrorism mission and an
assessment of the counterterrorism campaign within Operation
Resolute Support, including--
(i) the ability of NATO and the ANSF to detain individuals
for intelligence purposes and to prevent high-value detainees
from returning to the battlefield; and
(ii) an assessment of whether the Government of Afghanistan
is partnering effectively and conducting operations based on
NATO intelligence information.
(G) An assessment of United States military requirements
for the NATO train, advise, and assist mission,
counterterrorism, and force protection requirements under
Operation Resolute Support, including planned personnel
rotations and the associated time period of deployment for
the 1-year period beginning on the date of the submission of
the report required under subsection (a).
(d) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex, if necessary.
(e) Congressional Briefings.--The Secretary of Defense
shall supplement the report required under subsection (a)
with regular briefings to the appropriate congressional
committees on the subject matter of the report.
(f) Three-month Extension of Report on Progress Toward
Security and Stability in Afghanistan.--Section 1230(a) of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
(Public Law 110-181; 122 Stat. 385), as most recently amended
by section 1218(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1632), is
further amended by striking ``the end of fiscal year 2014''
and inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
(g) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

SEC. 1215. REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN IN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT
TO 150 PERCENT OF ALL TAXES ASSESSED BY
AFGHANISTAN TO EXTENT SUCH TAXES ARE NOT
REIMBURSED BY AFGHANISTAN.

(a) Requirement to Withhold Assistance to Afghanistan.--An
amount equivalent to 150 percent of the total taxes assessed
during fiscal year 2014 by the Government of Afghanistan on
all Department of Defense assistance in violation of the
status of forces agreement between the United States and
Afghanistan (entered in force May 28, 2003) shall be withheld
by the Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds
appropriated for such assistance for fiscal year 2015 to the
extent that the Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in
writing to the appropriate congressional committees that such
taxes have not been reimbursed by the Government of
Afghanistan to the Department of Defense or the grantee,
contractor, or subcontractor concerned.
(b) Waiver Authority.--The Secretary of Defense may waive
the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines
that such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States
goals in Afghanistan.
(c) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a report on the total taxes assessed during fiscal
year 2014 by the Government of Afghanistan on any Department
of Defense assistance.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term
``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2) Department of defense assistance.--The term
``Department of Defense assistance'' means funds provided in
a fiscal year to Afghanistan by the Department of Defense,
either directly or through grantees, contractors, or
subcontractors.
(e) Termination.--This section shall terminate at the close
of the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the
appropriate congressional committees a notification that the
United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral
security agreement and such agreement has entered into force.

SEC. 1216. UNITED STATES PLAN FOR SUSTAINING THE AFGHANISTAN
NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES THROUGH THE END OF
FISCAL YEAR 2018.

(a) Plan Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a
detailed plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Army
(ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) of the
Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) through the end
of fiscal year 2018, with the objective of ensuring that a
strong and fully-capable ANSF will be able to independently
and effectively conduct operations and maintain security and
stability in Afghanistan.
(b) Matters to Be Included.--The plan contained in the
report required under subsection (a) shall include a
description of the following matters:
(1) A comprehensive and effective strategy and budget, with
defined objectives.
(2) A description of the commitment for contributions from
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and non-NATO
nations, including the plan to achieve such commitments for
the ANSF.
(3) A mechanism for tracking funding, equipment, training,
and services provided for the ANSF by the United States,
countries participating in NATO, and other coalition forces
that are not part of Operation Resolute Support.
(4) Any actions to assist the Government of Afghanistan or
on its behalf to achieve the following goals and the results
of such actions:
(A) Improve and sustain effective Afghan security
institutions with fully capable senior leadership and staff,
including logistics, intelligence, medical, and recruiting
units.
(B) Any additional train and equip efforts, including for
the Afghan Air Force, as necessary, and Afghan Special
Mission Wing, such that these entities are fully-capable of
conducting operations independently and in sufficient
numbers.
(C) Establish strong ANSF-readiness assessment tools and
metrics.
(D) Improve and sustain strong, professional ANSF officers
at the junior-, mid-, and senior-levels
(E) Further strong ANSF communication and control between
central command and regions, provinces, and districts.
(F) Develop and improve mechanisms for incorporating
lessons learned and best practices into ANSF operations.
(G) Improve ANSF oversight mechanisms, including a strong
record-keeping system to track ANSF equipment and personnel.
(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

SEC. 1217. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON UNITED STATES MILITARY
COMMITMENT TO OPERATION RESOLUTE SUPPORT IN
AFGHANISTAN.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States continues to have vital national
security interests in ensuring that Afghanistan remains a
stable, sovereign country and that groups like Al Qaeda, the
Haqqani Network, and the Quetta Shura Taliban are not able to
use Afghanistan as a safe haven from which to launch attacks;
(2) the United States should have a residual presence in
Afghanistan to train, advise, and assist the ANSF, conduct
counterterrorism operations, and support force protection
requirements in order to maintain the gains achieved in
Afghanistan;
(3) it is in the interests of both the United States and
Afghanistan to sign the Bilateral Security Agreement as soon
as practicable after the new President of Afghanistan is
sworn in;
(4) the United States should provide financial, advisory,
and other necessary support to the ANSF, at the authorized
end-strength of 352,000 personnel, through 2018;
(5) the train, advise, and assist mission, following the
end of the NATO mission on December 31, 2014, should be able
to assist the ANSF in all parts of Afghanistan;
(6) uncertainty with the signing of the Bilateral Security
Agreement with Afghanistan is threatening the gains achieved
by the United States and coalition forces and the United
States' enduring vital national security interests in
Afghanistan and the region;
(7) the President should announce the United States
residual presence for Operation Resolute Support to reassure
the people of Afghanistan and to provide a tangible statement
of support for the future of Afghanistan;
(8) the United States should aggressively work with NATO
and the Government of Afghanistan to achieve a status of
forces agreement for NATO forces in support of the post-2014
mission; and
(9) NATO member countries pledged their support and long-
term commitment to Afghanistan at the Lisbon, Chicago, and
Tokyo conferences and should honor their commitments to
Afghanistan and the ANSF.

[[Page H4593]]

SEC. 1218. EXTENSION OF AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT PROGRAM.

Section 602(b)(3) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of
2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
``(E) Fiscal year 2015.--
``(i) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (D),
for fiscal year 2015, the total number of principal aliens
who may be provided special immigrant status under this
section may not exceed 1,075. For purposes of status provided
under this subparagraph--

``(I) the period during which an alien must have been
employed in accordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) must
terminate on or before December 31, 2015;
``(II) the principal alien seeking special immigrant status
under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission
in accordance with paragraph (2)(D) not later than September
30, 2015; and
``(III) the authority to provide such status shall
terminate on September 30, 2016.

``(ii) Construction.--Clause (i) shall not be construed to
affect numerical limitations, or the terms for provision of
status, under subparagraph (D).''.

Subtitle C--Matters Relating to the Russian Federation

SEC. 1221. LIMITATION ON MILITARY CONTACT AND COOPERATION
BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral
military-to-military contact or cooperation between the
Governments of the United States and the Russian Federation
until the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the
Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate
congressional committees that--
(1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no
longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
(2) the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of
all Ukrainian territory;
(3) the Russian Federation is no longer taking actions that
are inconsistent with the INF Treaty;
(4) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE
Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of
its treaty obligations; and
(5) the Russian Federation has not sold or otherwise
transferred the Club-K land attack cruise missile system to
any foreign country or foreign person during fiscal year
2014.
(b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the
limitation in subsection (a) with respect to a certification
requirement specified in paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) if--
(1) the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the
Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional
committees--
(A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national
security interest of the United States and a description of
the national security interest covered by the waiver; and
(B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot
make the certification under subsection (a); and
(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on
which the Secretary of Defense submits the information in the
report under subparagraph (B).
(c) Additional Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive
the limitation required by subsection (a)(5) with respect to
the sale or other transfer of the Club-K land attack cruise
missile system if--
(1) the United States has imposed sanctions against the
manufacturer of such system by reason of such sale or other
transfer; or
(2) the Secretary has developed and submitted to the
appropriate congressional committees a plan to prevent the
sale or other transfer of such system in the future.
(d) Exception for Certain Military Bases.--The
certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of
subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the
Russian Federation in Ukraine's Crimean peninsula operating
in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and
Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory
of Ukraine.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term
``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2) Bilateral military-to-military contact or
cooperation.--The term ``bilateral military-to-military
contact or cooperation''--
(A) means--
(i) reciprocal visits and meetings by high-ranking
delegations;
(ii) information sharing, policy consultations, security
dialogues or other forms of consultative discussions;
(iii) exchanges of military instructors, training
personnel, and students;
(iv) exchanges of information;
(v) defense planning; and
(vi) military training or exercises; but
(B) does not include any contact or cooperation that is in
support of United States stability operations.
(3) CFE treaty.--The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty
on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris
November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(4) INF treaty.--The term ``INF Treaty'' means the Treaty
Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-
Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at
Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1,
1988.
(f) Effective Date.--This section takes effect on the date
of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to
funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of
such date of enactment.

SEC. 1222. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS WITH RESPECT TO
CERTIFICATION OF CERTAIN FLIGHTS BY THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION UNDER THE TREATY ON OPEN SKIES.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or any other Act may be used to
authorize or permit a certification by the United States of a
proposal by the Russian Federation to change any sensor
package of an aircraft for a flight by the Russian Federation
under the Open Skies Treaty, unless--
(1) the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, and the Director of National Intelligence
jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees
that such proposal will not enhance the capability or
potential of the Russian Federation to gather intelligence
that poses an unacceptable risk to the national security of
the United States or is not designed to be collected under
such Treaty; and
(2) the Secretary of State certifies to the appropriate
congressional committees that--
(A) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no
longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
(B) the Russian Federation is no longer violating the INF
Treaty; and
(C) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE
Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of
its treaty obligations.
(b) Waiver.--The President may waive the requirement of the
Secretary of State to make a certification described in
subsection (a)(2) with respect to a proposal by the Russian
Federation if the President determines that it is in the
national security interests of the United States to do so and
submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report
that contains the reasons for such determination.
(c) Notice and Wait Requirement.--The President may not
authorize or permit a certification by the United States for
which the certifications required by paragraphs (1) and (2)
of subsection (a) are made until the expiration of a 90-day
period beginning on the date on which the certification
required by such paragraph (1) or the certification required
by such paragraph (2) is submitted to the appropriate
congressional committees, whichever occurs later.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term
``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(A) the congressional defense committees;
(B) the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee
on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(C) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2) CFE treaty.--The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty
on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris
November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(3) INF treaty.--The term ``INF Treaty'' means the Treaty
Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-
Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at
Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1,
1988.
(4) Open skies treaty.--The term ``Open Skies Treaty''
means the Treaty on Open Skies, done at Helsinki March 24,
1992, and entered into force January 1, 2002.

SEC. 1223. LIMITATIONS ON PROVIDING CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE
INFORMATION TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

(a) In General.--Section 1246(c) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 923) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2016'' and inserting
``2017'';
(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ``2014'' the
following: ``or 2015''; and
(3) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign
Affairs of the House of Representatives'' after
``congressional defense committees''.
(b) Limitations on Providing Other Information.--No funds
authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for
each of fiscal years 2015 through 2017 for the Department of
Defense may be used to provide the Government of the Russian
Federation or any Russian person with information relating to
the velocity at burnout of United States missile defense
interceptors or missile defense targets or related
information.

SEC. 1224. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER
MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION TO THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION.

(a) In General.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
or any subsequent fiscal year for the Department of Defense
may be obligated or expended to transfer missile defense
information to the Russian Federation unless, with respect to
such fiscal year, the President submits to the congressional
defense committees not later than October 31 of such fiscal
year a report on discussions between the Russian Federation
and the United States on missile defense matters during the
immediately preceding fiscal year, including any discussions
for cooperation

[[Page H4594]]

between the two countries on missile defense matters.
(b) Fiscal Year 2015 Report.--The report submitted pursuant
to subsection (a) with respect to fiscal year 2015 shall, in
addition to including the information described in subsection
(a) with respect to fiscal year 2014, include the information
described in subsection (a) with respect to fiscal years 2007
through 2013.

SEC. 1225. REPORT ON NON-COMPLIANCE BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE INF TREATY.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) the Russian Federation is in material breach of its
obligations under the Treaty Between the United States of
America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the
Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range
Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range
Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8,
1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988; and
(2) such behavior poses a threat to the United States, its
deployed forces, and its allies.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the President should hold the Russian Federation
accountable for being in material breach of its obligations
under the INF Treaty;
(2) the President should demand the Russian Federation
completely and verifiably eliminate the military systems that
constitute the material breach of its obligations under the
INF Treaty;
(3) the President should seriously consider not engaging in
further reductions of United States nuclear forces generally
and should seriously consider not engaging in nuclear arms
reduction negotiations with the Russian Federation
specifically until such complete and verifiable elimination
of the military systems has occurred; and
(4) the President, in consultation with United States
allies, should consider whether it is in the national
security interests of the United States to unilaterally
remain a party to the INF Treaty if the Russian Federation is
still in material breach of the INF Treaty beginning one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the
President shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees an unclassified report that includes the
following:
(1) The status of the President's efforts, in cooperation
with United States allies, to hold the Russian Federation
accountable for being in material breach of its obligations
under the INF Treaty and obtain the complete and verifiable
elimination of its military systems that constitute the
material breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(2) The President's assessment as to whether it remains in
the national security interests of the United States to
remain a party to the INF Treaty, and other related treaties
and agreements, while the Russian Federation is in material
breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(d) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--In this section,
the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(1) the congressional defense committees;
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(3) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives.

SEC. 1226. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING RUSSIAN AGGRESSION
TOWARD UKRAINE.

It is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) the continuing and long-standing pattern and practice
by the Government of the Russian Federation of physical,
diplomatic, and economic aggression toward neighboring
countries is clearly intended to exert undue influence on the
free will of sovereign nations and peoples to determine their
own future;
(2) the Russian military build-up and aggressive posture on
the eastern border of Ukraine represent a deliberate intent
to intimidate Ukraine and to force its citizens to submit to
Russian control;
(3) the Russian Federation should immediately cease all
improper and illegal activities in Ukraine;
(4) the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances,
which was executed jointly with the Russian Federation,
Ukraine, and the United Kingdom, represents a commitment to
respect the independence, sovereignty, and territorial
integrity and borders of Ukraine, and Russian actions clearly
violate the commitment made by the Russian Federation in that
memorandum;
(5) the security cooperation with the Ukrainian military by
the United States military is an important opportunity to
support the continued professionalization of the Ukrainian
military;
(6) an enhanced military presence and readiness posture of
the United States military in Europe is key to deterring
further Russian aggression and assuring allies and partners;
and
(7) the treaty commitments under Article 5 of the North
Atlantic Treaty signed at Washington, April 4, 1949, and
entered into force August 24, 1949, are important and a
cornerstone to international security.

SEC. 1227. ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY
DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

(a) Report.--Not later than June 1 of each year, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report, in both classified and
unclassified form, on the current and future military power
of the Russian Federation (in this section referred to as
``Russia''). The report shall address the current and
probable future course of military-technological development
of the Russian military, the tenets and probable development
of Russian security strategy and military strategy, and
military organizations and operational concepts, for the 20-
year period following submission of such report.
(b) Matters to Be Included.--A report required under
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the security situation in regions
neighboring Russia.
(2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy
and military strategy.
(3) Trends in Russian security and military behavior that
would be designed to achieve, or that are consistent with,
the goals described in paragraph (2).
(4) An assessment of Russia's global and regional security
objectives, including objectives that would affect NATO, the
Middle East, and the People's Republic of China.
(5) A detailed assessment of the sizes, locations, and
capabilities of Russian nuclear, special operations, land,
sea, and air forces.
(6) Developments in Russian military doctrine and training.
(7) An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia
and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials,
technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or
other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems.
(8) Developments in Russia's asymmetric capabilities,
including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy
cyber warfare and electronic warfare capabilities, details on
the number of malicious cyber incidents originating from
Russia against Department of Defense infrastructure, and
associated activities originating or suspected of originating
from Russia.
(9) The strategy and capabilities of Russian space and
counterspace programs, including trends, global and regional
activities, the involvement of military and civilian
organizations, including state-owned enterprises, academic
institutions, and commercial entities, and efforts to
develop, acquire, or gain access to advanced technologies
that would enhance Russian military capabilities.
(10) Developments in Russia's nuclear program, including
the size and state of Russia's stockpile, its nuclear
strategy and associated doctrines, its civil and military
production capacities, and projections of its future
arsenals.
(11) A description of Russia's anti-access and area denial
capabilities.
(12) A description of Russia's command, control,
communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance modernization program and its applications for
Russia's precision guided weapons.
(13) In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the
Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-
Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters.
(14) The current state of United States military-to-
military contacts with the Russian Federation armed forces,
which shall include the following:
(A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such
military-to-military contacts and updates to the strategy.
(B) A summary of all such military-to-military contacts
during the one-year period preceding the report, including a
summary of topics discussed and questions asked by the
Russian participants in those contacts.
(C) A description of such military-to-military contacts
scheduled for the 12-month period following such report and
the plan for future contacts.
(D) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the Russians
expect to gain from such military-to-military contacts.
(E) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the
Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-
military contacts, and any concerns regarding such contacts.
(F) The Secretary's assessment of how such military-to-
military contacts fit into the larger security relationship
between the United States and the Russian Federation.
(15) A description of Russian military-to-military
relationships with other countries, including the size and
activity of military attache offices around the world and
military education programs conducted in Russia for other
countries or in other countries for the Russians.
(16) Other military and security developments involving
Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to
United States national security.
(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(d) Repeal of Superseded Authority.--Section 10 of the
Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and
Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-95)
is repealed.
(e) Sunset.--This section shall terminate on June 1, 2021.

Subtitle D--Matters Relating to the Asia-Pacific Region

SEC. 1231. STRATEGY TO PRIORITIZE UNITED STATES INTERESTS IN
THE UNITED STATES PACIFIC COMMAND AREA OF
RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.

(a) Strategy.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination
with the Secretary of State and the heads of other Federal
departments and agencies specified in paragraph (4), shall
develop a strategy to prioritize United States interests in
the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility.
(2) Matters to be included.--The strategy required by
paragraph (1) shall address the following:
(A) Strengthening bilateral security alliances.

[[Page H4595]]

(B) Improving relationships with countries that are
emerging powers.
(C) Engaging with regional multilateral institutions.
(D) Expanding trade and investment.
(E) Bolstering a capable military presence.
(F) Promoting democracy and human rights.
(G) Coordinating efforts to counter transnational threats.
(H) Maintaining a rules-based structure.
(I) Improving the current and future security environment.
(J) Prioritizing United States military and diplomatic
missions within respective Federal department or agency
planning and budgeting guidance.
(K) Coordinating a response framework to prepare for,
respond to, and recover from emergencies.
(L) Prioritizing security cooperation initiatives,
including military-to-military and military-to-civilian
engagements.
(3) Asia rebalancing strategy.--The strategy required by
paragraph (1) shall be informed by the results of the
integrated, multi-year planning and budget strategy for a
rebalancing of United States policy in Asia submitted to
Congress pursuant to section 7043(a) of the Department of
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs
Appropriations Act, 2014 (division K of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113-76)).
(4) Federal departments and agencies specified.--The
Federal departments and agencies specified in this paragraph
are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of
Transportation, the Department of Commerce, the Department of
the Interior, the Office of the United States Trade
Representative, and any other relevant department or agency
as specified by the Secretary of Defense.
(b) Implementation Plan.--
(1) In general.--The President, acting through the National
Security Council and in coordination with the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget, shall develop an
implementation plan for the Department of Defense, the
Department of State, and each Federal department and agency
specified in subsection (a)(4) to support the strategy
required by subsection (a). The implementation plan shall
provide specific goals and areas of focus for each department
and agency to prioritize funding in its annual budget
submissions.
(2) Relation to agency priority goals and annual budget.--
(A) Agency priority goals.--In identifying agency priority
goals under section 1120(b) of title 31, United States Code,
for the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and
each Federal department and agency specified in subsection
(a)(4), the President, acting through the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget, shall take into
consideration the strategy required by subsection (a) and the
implementation plan of the department or agency required by
paragraph (1).
(B) Annual budget.--The President, acting through the
Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall ensure
that the annual budget submitted to Congress under section
1105 of title 31, United States Code, includes a separate
section that clearly highlights programs and projects that
are being funded in the annual budget that relate to the
strategy required by subsection (a) and the implementation
plan of the Department of Defense, the Department of State,
and each Federal department and agency specified in
subsection (a)(4).
(c) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the
National Security Council, shall submit to Congress a report
than contains the strategy required by subsection (a) and
each implementation plan required by subsection (b).
(2) Form.--The report shall be submitted in unclassified
form but may contain a classified annex if necessary.

SEC. 1232. MODIFICATIONS TO ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY AND
SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE PEOPLE'S
REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

(a) Matters To Be Included.--Subsection (b) of section 1202
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2000 (Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 781; 10 U.S.C. 113 note)
is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (20) as
paragraphs (11) through (21), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
``(10) The developments in maritime law enforcement
capabilities and organization of the People's Republic of
China, focusing on activities in contested maritime areas in
the South China Sea and East China Sea. Such analyses shall
include an assessment of the nature of China's maritime law
enforcement activities directed against United States allies
and partners. Such maritime activities shall include
activities originating or suspect of originating from China
and shall include government and nongovernment activities
that are believed to be sanctioned or supported by the
Chinese government.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and
apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under
subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, as so amended, on or
after that date.

SEC. 1233. REPORT ON GOALS AND OBJECTIVES GUIDING MILITARY
ENGAGEMENT WITH BURMA.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than December 1, 2014, the
Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of
State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a report on the goals and objectives guiding
military-to-military engagement between the United States and
the Union of Burma.
(b) Matters to Be Included.--The report required under
subsection (a) shall include--
(1) a description of the specific goals and objectives of
the United States that military-to-military engagement
between the United States and Burma would facilitate;
(2) a description of how the United States measures
progress toward such goals and objectives, and the
implications of failing to achieve such goals and objectives;
(3) a description of the specific military-to-military
engagement activities between the United States and Burma
conducted during the period beginning on March 1, 2011, and
ending on the close of the day before the date of the
submission of the report, and of any planned military-to-
military engagement activities between the United States and
Burma that will be conducted during the period beginning on
the date of the submission of the report and ending on the
close of February 29, 2020, including descriptions of
associated goals and objectives, estimated costs, timeframes,
and United States military organizations or personnel
involved;
(4) a description and assessment of the political,
military, economic, and civil society reforms being
undertaken by the Government of Burma, including--
(A) protecting the individual freedoms and human rights of
the Burmese people, including for all ethnic and religious
minorities and internally displaced populations;
(B) establishing civilian control of the armed forces;
(C) implementing constitutional and electoral reforms;
(D) allowing access to all areas in Burma; and
(E) increasing governmental transparency and
accountability; and
(5) a description and assessment of relationships of the
Government of Burma with unlawful or sanctioned entities.
(c) Update.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination
with the Secretary of State, shall submit on an annual basis
to the appropriate congressional committees an update of the
matters described in subsection (b)(4) and included in the
report required under subsection (a).
(2) Sunset.--The requirement to submit updates under
paragraph (1) shall terminate at the end of the 5-year period
beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall
be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex, if necessary.
(e) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

SEC. 1234. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MUNITIONS STRATEGY
FOR UNITED STATES PACIFIC COMMAND.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2015, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the munitions strategy for the
United States Pacific Command, including an identification of
munitions requirements, an assessment of munitions gaps and
shortfalls, and necessary munitions investments. Such
strategy shall cover the 10-year period beginning with 2015.
(b) Elements.--The report on munitions strategy required by
subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An identification of current and projected munitions
requirements, by class or type.
(2) An assessment of munitions gaps and shortfalls,
including a census of current munitions capabilities and
programs, not including ammunition.
(3) A description of current and planned munitions
programs, including with respect to procurement, research,
development, test and evaluation, and deployment activities.
(4) Schedules, estimated costs, and budget plans for
current and planned munitions programs.
(5) Identification of opportunities and limitations within
the associated industrial base.
(6) Identification and evaluation of technology needs and
applicable emerging technologies, including with respect to
directed energy, rail gun, and cyber technologies.
(7) An assessment of how current and planned munitions
programs, and promising technologies, may affect existing
operational concepts and capabilities of the military
departments or lead to new operational concepts and
capabilities.
(8) An assessment of programs and capabilities by other
countries to counter the munitions programs and capabilities
of the Armed Forces of the United States, not including with
respect to ammunition, and how such assessment affects the
munitions strategy of each military department.
(9) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.
(c) Form.--The report under subsection (a) may be submitted
in classified or unclassified form.

SEC. 1235. MISSILE DEFENSE COOPERATION.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) Admiral Samuel Locklear, Commander of the United States
Pacific Command, testified before the Committee on Armed
Services of the House of Representatives on March 5, 2014,
that in the spring of 2013, North Korea ``conducted another
underground nuclear test, threatened the use of a nuclear
weapon against the United States, and concurrently conducted
a mobile missile deployment of an Intermediate Range
Ballistic Missile, reportedly capable of ranging our western
most U.S. territory in the Pacific.'';
(2) General Curtis Scaparrotti, Commander of the United
States Forces Korea, testified before

[[Page H4596]]

such committee on April 2, 2014, that ``CFC [Combined Forces
Command] is placing special emphasis on missile defense, not
only in terms of systems and capabilities, but also with
regard to implementing an Alliance counter-missile strategy
required for our combined defense.''; and
(3) increased emphasis and cooperation on missile defense
among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea,
enhances the security of allies of the United States in
Northeast Asia, increases the defense of forward-based forces
of the United States, and enhances the protection of the
United States.
(b) Assessment Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
conduct an assessment to identify opportunities for
increasing missile defense cooperation among the United
States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, and to evaluate
options for short-range missile, rocket, and artillery
defense capabilities.
(c) Elements.--The assessment under subsection (b) shall
include the following:
(1) Candidate areas for increasing missile defense
cooperation, including greater information sharing, systems
integration, and joint operations.
(2) Potential challenges and limitations to enabling such
cooperation and plans for mitigating such challenges and
limitations.
(3) An assessment of the utility of short-range missile
defense and counter-rocket, artillery, and mortar system
capabilities, including with respect to--
(A) the requirements for such capabilities to meet
operational and contingency plan requirements in Northeast
Asia;
(B) cost, schedule, and availability;
(C) technology maturity and risk; and
(D) consideration of alternatives.
(d) Briefing Required.--Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall provide to the congressional defense committees a
briefing on the assessment under subsection (b).

SEC. 1236. MARITIME CAPABILITIES OF TAIWAN AND ITS
CONTRIBUTION TO REGIONAL PEACE AND STABILITY.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than April 1, 2016, the
Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the congressional
defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives a report that contains the following:
(1) A description and assessment of the posture and
readiness of elements of the Chinese People's Liberation Army
expected or available to threaten the maritime or territorial
security of Taiwan, including an assessment of--
(A) the undersea and surface warfare capabilities of the
People's Liberation Army Navy in the littoral areas in and
around the Taiwan Strait;
(B) the amphibious and heavy sealift capabilities of the
People's Liberation Army Navy;
(C) the capabilities of the People's Liberation Army Air
Force to establish air dominance over Taiwan; and
(D) the capabilities of the People's Liberation Army Second
Artillery Corps to suppress or destroy the forces of Taiwan
necessary to defend the security of Taiwan.
(2) A description and assessment of the posture and
readiness of elements of the armed forces of Taiwan expected
or available to maintain the maritime or territorial security
of Taiwan, including an assessment of--
(A) the undersea and surface warfare capabilities of the
navy of Taiwan;
(B) the land-based anti-ship cruise missile capabilities of
Taiwan; and
(C) other anti-access or area-denial capabilities, such as
mines, that contribute to the deterrence of Taiwan against
actions taken to determine the future of Taiwan by other than
peaceful means.
(b) Form.--The report required by subsection (a) may be
submitted in classified or unclassified form.
(c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States, in accordance with the Taiwan
Relations Act (Public Law 96-8), should continue to make
available to Taiwan such defense articles and services as may
be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-
defense capability;
(2) the growth and modernization of the People's Liberation
Army, including its focus on ``preparing for potential
conflict in the Taiwan Strait [which] appears to remain the
principal focus and primary driver of China's military
investment'', as noted in the 2013 Office of the Secretary of
Defense Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security
Developments Involving the People's Republic of China,
requires greater attention to the needed defense capabilities
of Taiwan; and
(3) the United States should consider opportunities to help
enhance the maritime capabilities and nautical skills of the
Taiwanese navy that can contribute to Taiwan's self-defense
and to regional peace and stability, including extending an
invitation to Taiwan to participate in the 2014 Rim of the
Pacific international maritime exercise in non-combat areas
such as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief
operations.

SEC. 1237. INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT ON COUNTERING ANTI-ACCESS
AND AREA-DENIAL STRATEGIES AND CAPABILITIES IN
THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION.

(a) Assessment Required.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall enter into
an agreement with an independent entity to conduct an
assessment of anti-access and area-denial strategies and
capabilities that pose a threat to security in the Asia-
Pacific region and strategies to mitigate such threats.
(2) Matters to be included.--The assessment required under
paragraph (1) shall include--
(A) identification of anti-access and area-denial
strategies and capabilities;
(B) assessment of gaps and shortfalls in the ability of the
United States to address anti-access and area-denial
strategies and capabilities identified under subparagraph (A)
and plans of the Department of Defense to address such gaps
and shortfalls;
(C) assessment of Department of Defense strategies to
counter or mitigate anti-access and area-denial strategies
and capabilities identified under subparagraph (A); and
(D) any other matters the independent entity determines to
be appropriate.
(b) Report Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report that includes the assessment and
strategies required under subsection (a) and any other
matters the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
(2) Form.--The report required under paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified
annex if necessary.
(c) Department of Defense Support.--The Secretary of
Defense shall provide the independent entity described in
subsection (a) with timely access to appropriate information,
data, and analysis so that the entity may conduct a thorough
and independent assessment as required under subsection (a).

SEC. 1238. SENSE OF CONGRESS REAFFIRMING SECURITY COMMITMENT
TO JAPAN.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States highly values its alliance with the
Government of Japan as a cornerstone of peace and security in
the region, based on shared values of democracy, the rule of
law, free and open markets, and respect for human rights in
order to promote peace, security, stability, and economic
prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region;
(2) the United States welcomes Japan's determination to
contribute more proactively to regional and global peace and
security;
(3) the United States supports recent increases in Japanese
defense funding, adoption of a National Security Strategy,
formation of security institutions such as the Japanese
National Security Council, and other moves that will enable
Japan to bear even greater alliance responsibilities;
(4) the United States and Japan should continue to improve
joint interoperability and collaborate on developing future
capabilities with which to maintain regional stability in an
increasingly uncertain security environment;
(5) the United States and Japan should continue efforts to
strengthen regional multilateral institutions that promote
economic and security cooperation based on internationally
accepted rules and norms;
(6) the United States acknowledges that the Senkaku Islands
are under the administration of Japan and opposes any
unilateral actions that would seek to undermine such
administration and remains committed under the Treaty of
Mutual Cooperation and Security to respond to any armed
attack in the territories under the administration of Japan;
and
(7) the United States reaffirms its commitment to the
Government of Japan under Article V of the Treaty of Mutual
Cooperation and Security that ``[e]ach Party recognizes that
an armed attack against either Party in the territories under
the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own
peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the
common danger in accordance with its constitutional
provisions and processes''.

SEC. 1239. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON OPPORTUNITIES TO STRENGTHEN
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE
REPUBLIC OF KOREA.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the alliance between the United States and Republic of
Korea has served as an anchor for stability, security, and
prosperity on the Korean Peninsula, in the Asia-Pacific
region, and around the world;
(2) the United States and Republic of Korea continue to
strengthen and adapt the alliance to serve as a linchpin of
peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, recognizing
the shared values of democracy, human rights, and the rule of
law as the foundations of the alliance;
(3) the United States and Republic of Korea share deep
concerns that North Korea's nuclear and ballistic missiles
programs and its repeated provocations pose grave threats to
peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and Northeast
Asia and recognize that both nations are determined to
achieve the peaceful denuclearization of North Korea, and
remain fully committed to continuing close cooperation on the
full range of issues related to North Korea;
(4) the United States supports the vision of a Korean
Peninsula free of nuclear weapons, free from the fear of war,
and peacefully reunited on the basis of democratic and free
market principles, as articulated in President Park's Dresden
address;
(5) the United States and Republic of Korea are
strengthening the combined defense posture on the Korean
Peninsula;
(6) the United States and Republic of Korea have decided
that due to the evolving security environment in the region,
including the enduring North Korean nuclear and missile
threat, the current timeline to the transition of wartime
operational control (OPCON) to a Republic of Korea-led
defense in 2015 can be reconsidered; and
(7) the United States welcomes the Republic of Korea's
ratification of a new five-year Special Measures Agreement,
which establishes the framework for Republic of Korea
contributions to offset the costs associated with the
stationing of United States Forces Korea on the Korean
Peninsula.

[[Page H4597]]

Subtitle E--Other Matters

SEC. 1241. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SUPPORT OF SPECIAL
OPERATIONS TO COMBAT TERRORISM.

Section 1208(h) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375;
118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1203(c)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1621), is further amended
by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2017''.

SEC. 1242. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-
CONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES.

(a) Extension.--Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4579), as most recently
amended by section 1241 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 920),
is further amended by striking ``2015'' and inserting
``2016''.
(b) Cross-reference Amendment.--Subsection (f) of such
section is amended by striking ``413b(e)'' and inserting
``3093(e)''.

SEC. 1243. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT
OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE OF
SECURITY COOPERATION IN IRAQ.

Section 1215(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1631;
10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 1214
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 906; 10 U.S.C. 113 note),
is further amended--
(1) by striking ``fiscal year 2014'' and inserting ``fiscal
year 2015'';
(2) by striking ``non-operational''; and
(3) by striking ``in an institutional environment'' and
inserting ``at a base or facility of the Government of
Iraq''.

SEC. 1244. MODIFICATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY PLANNING
GUIDANCE TO DENY SAFE HAVENS TO AL-QAEDA AND
ITS VIOLENT EXTREMIST AFFILIATES.

(a) Modification.--Section 1032(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (2)--
(A) by redesignating subparagraph (C), (D), and (E) as
subparagraph (D), (E), and (F), respectively;
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
``(C) For each specified geographic area, a description of
the following:
``(i) The feasibility of conducting multilateral programs
to train and equip the military forces of relevant countries
in the area.
``(ii) The authority and funding that would be required to
support such programs.
``(iii) How such programs would be implemented.
``(iv) How such programs would support the national
security priorities and interests of the United States and
complement other efforts of the United States Government in
the area and in other specified geographic areas.''; and
(C) in subparagraph (F) (as redesignated), by striking
``subparagraph (C)'' and inserting ``subparagraph (D)''; and
(2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ``paragraph (2)(C)''
and inserting ``paragraph (2)(D)''.
(b) Report.--Section 1032(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note), as amended by
subsection (a), is further amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
``(4) Report.--
``(A) In general.--Not later than October 1, 2014, the
President shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a report that contains the national security
planning guidance required under paragraph (1), including any
updates thereto.
``(B) Form.--The report may include a classified annex as
determined to be necessary by the President.
``(C) Definition.--In this paragraph, the term `appropriate
congressional committees' means--
``(i) the congressional defense committees; and
``(ii) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.''.

SEC. 1245. ENHANCED AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE GOODS AND SERVICES
OF DJIBOUTI IN SUPPORT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
ACTIVITIES IN UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND AREA
OF RESPONSIBILITY.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States forces should continue to be forward
postured in Africa and in the Middle East;
(2) Djibouti is in a strategic location to support United
States vital national security interests in the region;
(3) the United States should take definitive steps to
maintain its basing access and agreements with the Government
of Djibouti to support United States vital national security
interests in the region;
(4) the United States should devise and implement a
comprehensive governmental approach to engaging with the
Government of Djibouti to reinforce the strategic partnership
between the United States and Djibouti; and
(5) the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the
United States Agency for International Development, in
conjunction with the Secretary of Defense, should take
concrete steps to advance and strengthen the relationship
between United States and the Government of Djibouti.
(b) Authority.--In the case of a good or service to be
acquired in direct support of covered activities for which
the Secretary of Defense makes a determination described in
subsection (c), the Secretary may conduct a procurement in
which--
(1) competition is limited to goods of Djibouti or services
of Djibouti; or
(2) a preference is provided for goods of Djibouti or
services of Djibouti.
(c) Determination.--
(1) In general.--A determination described in this
subsection is a determination by the Secretary of either of
the following:
(A) That the good or service concerned is to be used only
in support of covered activities.
(B) That it is vital to the national security interests of
the United States to limit competition or provide a
preference as described in subsection (b) because such
limitation or preference is necessary--
(i) to reduce--

(I) United States transportation costs; or
(II) delivery times in support of covered activities; or

(ii) to promote regional security, stability, and economic
prosperity in Africa.
(C) That the good or service is of equivalent quality of a
good or service that would have otherwise been acquired.
(2) Additional requirement.--A determination under
paragraph (1)(B) shall not be effective for purposes of a
limitation or preference under subsection (b) unless the
Secretary also determines that the limitation or preference
will not adversely affect--
(A) United States military operations or stability
operations in the United States Africa Command area of
responsibility; or
(B) the United States industrial base.
(d) Reporting and Oversight.--In exercising the authority
under subsection (b) to procure goods or services in support
of covered activities, the Secretary of Defense--
(1) in the case of the procurement of services, shall
ensure that the procurement is conducted in accordance with
the management structure implemented pursuant to section
2330(a) of title 10, United States Code;
(2) shall ensure that such goods or services are identified
and reported under a single, joint Department of Defense-wide
system for the management and accountability of contractors
accompanying United States forces operating overseas or in
contingency operations (such as the synchronized
predeployment and operational tracker (SPOT) system); and
(3) shall ensure that the United States Africa Command has
sufficiently trained staff and adequate resources to conduct
oversight of procurements carried out pursuant to subsection
(b), including oversight to detect and deter fraud, waste,
and abuse.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Covered activities.--The term ``covered activities''
means Department of Defense activities in the United States
Africa Command area of responsibility.
(2) Good of djibouti.--The term ``good of Djibouti'' means
a good wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of
Djibouti.
(3) Service of djibouti.--The term ``service of Djibouti''
means a service performed by a person that--
(A)(i) is operating primarily in Djibouti; or
(ii) is making a significant contribution to the economy of
Djibouti through payment of taxes or use of products,
materials, or labor of Djibouti, as determined by the
Secretary of State; and
(B) is properly licensed or registered by authorities of
the Government of Djibouti, as determined by the Secretary of
State.
(f) Termination.--The authority and requirements of this
section expire at the close of September 30, 2018.

SEC. 1246. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR UNITED STATES SECURITY
FORCE ASSISTANCE AND COOPERATION IN THE
EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN REGIONS.

(a) Strategic Framework.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination
with the Secretary of State, shall develop a strategic
framework for United States security force assistance and
cooperation in the European and Eurasian regions.
(2) Elements.--The strategic framework required by
paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An evaluation of the extent to which the threat to
security and stability in the European and Eurasian regions
is a threat to the national security of the United States and
the security interests of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization alliance.
(B) An identification of the primary objectives,
priorities, and desired end-states of United States security
force assistance and cooperation programs in such regions and
of the resources required to achieve such objectives,
priorities, and end states.
(C) A methodology for assessing the effectiveness of United
States security force assistance and cooperation programs in
such regions in making progress towards such objectives,
priorities, and end-states, including an identification of
key benchmarks for such progress.
(D) Criteria for bilateral and multilateral partnerships in
such regions.
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report on the
strategic framework required by subsection (a).
(2) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
(3) Definition.--In this subsection, the term ``appropriate
congressional committees'' means--

[[Page H4598]]

(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1247. REQUIREMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO CONTINUE
IMPLEMENTATION OF UNITED STATES STRATEGY TO
PREVENT AND RESPOND TO GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE
GLOBALLY AND PARTICIPATION IN INTERAGENCY
WORKING GROUP.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the most dangerous places to be a woman are some of the
most unstable and violent regions in the world and gender-
based violence will impact one in three women worldwide and
this in turn has a direct impact on United States national
security, the stability of nations, the rule of law,
democracy, and peace-building processes;
(2) combating violence against women and girls through the
implementation and integration of gender-based violence
prevention and response mechanisms throughout United States
overseas operations is a critical step toward promoting
regional and global stability and achieving sustainable peace
and security;
(3) under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee
of Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012
(H.R. 2055, One Hundred Twelfth Congress), the Secretary of
State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for
International Development were directed in the matter
relating to section 7061 to submit to Congress a multi-year
strategy to prevent and respond to violence against women and
girls in countries where it is common through achievable and
sustainable goals, benchmarks for measuring progress, and
expected results, including through regular engagement with
men and boys as community leaders and advocates in ending
such violence;
(4) Executive Order 13623 of August 10, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg.
49345) established the United States Strategy to Prevent and
Respond to Gender-based Violence Globally (in this section
referred to as the ``Strategy''), the first such strategy
submitted pursuant to the matter relating to section 7061
under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of
Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012;
(5) Executive Order 13623 required the Department of
Defense to participate in an Interagency Working Group co-
chaired by the Department of State and the United States
Agency for International Development to implement the
Strategy; and
(6) since the authority for the Strategy was established
initially in the matter relating to section 7061 under the
Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference
accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and
Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012, it is important
for Congress to maintain its appropriate oversight over the
implementation of the Strategy.
(b) Briefings Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
brief the appropriate congressional committees on efforts of
the Department of Defense relating to participation in the
Interagency Working Group to implement the Strategy.
(2) Matters to be included.--As part of the briefings, the
Secretary shall describe specifically efforts of the
Department of Defense in the Interagency Working Group to
implement international violence against women and girls
prevention and response strategies, funding allocations,
programming, and associated outcomes.
(3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this
subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(c) Requirement to Continue Implementation of Strategy and
Participation in Interagency Working Group.--The Secretary of
Defense shall ensure that the Department of Defense--
(1) during the current period of the Strategy, continues to
implement the Strategy as appropriate by reason of the role
of the Department of Defense in the Interagency Working
Group; and
(2) continues to participate in interagency collaborative
efforts to prevent and respond to violence against women and
girls.

SEC. 1248. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS OF
ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ACTIVITY.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) There is a lack of situational awareness within the
Department of Defense concerning how state and non-state
adversaries and potential adversaries are interwoven into the
international financial and trading systems via legal and
licit activities and use such market activities to fund and
equip themselves and advance their interests.
(2) There is a lack of capability within the Department of
Defense to formulate policy options within the interagency
process, or for consideration within the Department,
concerning whether state and non-state adversaries and
potential adversaries have key vulnerabilities associated
with their positioning within the global economic and
financial systems.
(3) The Department of Defense would benefit from having
enhanced situational awareness regarding the commercial and
strategic interactions of state and non-state adversaries and
potential adversaries within the global economic and
financial systems and integrating relevant findings into
defense policy options, deterrence strategy, planning and
preparedness.
(4) The state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds
of adversaries and potential adversaries represent, in some
cases, strategic tools of their controlling governments and
their global operations and therefore warrant increased
scrutiny and knowledge.
(5) Without improved situational awareness of the business
transactions and financial activities of state and non-state
adversaries and potential adversaries, as well as entities
they own and control, current efforts and deterrence
strategies will continue to represent an underdeveloped
defense requirement that lacks strategic direction.
(b) Enhanced Situational Awareness Required.--The Secretary
of Defense shall take such steps as may be necessary to
improve--
(1) the situational awareness capabilities of the
Department of Defense regarding the legal and licit business
transactions and global market positioning of adversaries and
potential adversaries; and
(2) the ability of the Department to translate such
situational awareness into the intelligence, planning,
deterrence, and capabilities and strategies of the
Department.

SEC. 1249. TREATMENT OF THE KURDISTAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND
THE PATRIOTIC UNION OF KURDISTAN UNDER THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.

(a) Discretion to Exclude Kurdistan Democratic Party and
Patriotic Union of Kurdistan From Treatment as Terrorist
Organizations.--The Secretary of State, after consultation
with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney
General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security, after
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney
General, may exclude the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the
Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from the definition of terrorist
organization in section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)) for the
limited purpose of issuing a temporary visa to a member of
the Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of
Kurdistan.
(b) Prohibition on Judicial Review.--Notwithstanding any
other provision of law (whether statutory or nonstatutory),
section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1252), sections 1361 and 1651 of title 28, United States
Code, section 2241 of such title, and any other habeas corpus
provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review
any determination made pursuant to subsection (a).

SEC. 1250. PROHIBITION ON INTEGRATION OF CERTAIN MISSILE
DEFENSE SYSTEMS.

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act
or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the
Department of Defense or for United States contributions to
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization may be obligated or
expended to integrate missile defense systems of the People's
Republic of China into missile defense systems of the United
States.

Subtitle F--Reports and Sense of Congress Provisions

SEC. 1261. REPORT ON ``NEW NORMAL'' AND GENERAL MISSION
REQUIREMENTS OF UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States Africa Command should have sufficient
assigned military forces; intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance assets; crisis response forces; and enablers
to support the crisis response forces to meet the ``New
Normal'' and general mission requirements in the area of
responsibility of the United States Africa Command;
(2) with the current force posture and structure of the
United States Africa Command, the United States is accepting
a high level of risk in defending United States posts that
are ``high risk, high threat'' posts;
(3) the United States should posture forces forward and
achieve the associated basing and access agreements to
support such forces across the Continent of Africa in order
to meet the ``New Normal'' and general mission requirements
in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa
Command;
(4) the Department of Defense should consider reassigning
to the United States Africa Command enabler assets currently
assigned to, and shared with, the United States European
Command; and
(5) the United States Africa Command requires more
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets to meet
the ``New Normal'' and general mission requirements in its
area of responsibility.
(b) Report.--Not later than January 15, 2015, the Secretary
of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall submit to
the appropriate congressional committees a report on the
extent to which the ``New Normal'' requirements have changed
the force posture and structure required of the United States
Africa Command to meet the ``New Normal'' and general mission
requirements in its area of responsibility.
(c) Elements.--The report required by subsection (b) shall
include the following:
(1) A detailed description of the ``New Normal'' and
general mission requirements in the area of responsibility of
the United States Africa Command.
(2) A description of any changes required for the United
States Africa Command to meet the ``New Normal'' and general
mission requirements in its area of responsibility, including
the gaps or shortfalls in capability, size, posture,
agreements, basing, and enabler support of all crisis
response forces and associated assets to access and defend
posts that are ``high risk, high threat'' posts.

[[Page H4599]]

(3) An assessment of how the United States Africa Command
could employ permanently assigned military forces to support
all mission requirements of the United States Africa Command.
(4) An estimate of the annual intelligence, surveillance,
and reconnaissance requirements of the United States Africa
Command and the shortfall, if any, in meeting such
requirements in fiscal year 2015.
(d) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
(e) Form.--The report required by subsection (b) may
include a classified annex.

SEC. 1262. REPORT ON CONTRACTORS WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE THAT HAVE CONDUCTED SIGNIFICANT
TRANSACTIONS WITH IRANIAN PERSONS OR THE
GOVERNMENT OF IRAN.

(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for a
period not to exceed 3 years, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report
that contains the following:
(1) A list of each contractor with the Department of
Defense (including any subcontractors at any tier of the
contractor), and any person owned or controlled by the
contractor or that owns or controls the contractor, that has
conducted a significant transaction with an Iranian person
(other than an Iranian person listed under paragraph (2)) or
the Government of Iran.
(2) A list of each contractor with the Department of
Defense (including any subcontractors at any tier of the
contractor), and any person owned or controlled by the
contractor or that owns or controls the contractor, that has
conducted a significant transaction with an Iranian person
whose property has been blocked pursuant to Executive Order
13224 (66 Fed. Reg. 49079) or Executive Order 13382 (70 Fed.
Reg. 38567) during the 5-year period preceding the date of
the submission of the report.
(3) The value of each significant transaction described in
paragraphs (1) and (2).
(b) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means--
(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate; and
(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1263. REPORTS ON NUCLEAR PROGRAM OF IRAN.

(a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to
Congress a report on the interim agreement relating to the
nuclear program of Iran. Such report shall include--
(1) verification of whether Iran is complying with such
agreement; and
(2) an assessment of the overall state of the nuclear
program of Iran.
(b) Additional Reports.--If the interim agreement described
in subsection (a) is renewed or if a comprehensive and final
agreement is entered into regarding the nuclear program of
Iran, by not later than 90 days after such renewal or final
agreement being entered into, the President shall submit to
Congress a report on such renewed or final agreement. Such
report shall include the matters described in paragraphs (1)
and (2) of subsection (a).

SEC. 1264. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON UNITED STATES PRESENCE AND
COOPERATION IN THE ARABIAN GULF REGION TO DETER
IRAN.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States should maintain a robust forward
presence and posture in order to support United States allies
and partners in the Arabian Gulf region, including Gulf
Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and Israel, and to deter
Iran;
(2) the United States should seek ways to support the
security posture of GCC countries in the Arabian Gulf region
to deter Iran;
(3) key strategic United States bases in the Arabian Gulf
region that are used to deter Iran and would be used for any
military operations in the Arabian Gulf region are entirely
financed by funds for overseas contingency operations which
is an unsustainable approach;
(4) such key strategic United States bases in the Arabian
Gulf region should be funded through the base budget of the
Department of Defense;
(5) the United States does not have status of forces
agreements and defense agreements with key GCC allies, which
would support the defense of the Arabian Gulf region and
would deter Iran, and the United States should seek to
complete these agreements immediately;
(6) the interim agreement with Iran relating to Iran's
nuclear program does not address key aspects of Iran's
nuclear program, including the possible military dimensions
of Iran's nuclear program;
(7) a comprehensive agreement with Iran relating to Iran's
efforts to develop a nuclear weapons capability should
address past and present issues of concern of the United
States, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the
United Nations Security Council;
(8) the United States should continue to put significant
pressure on Iran's network of organizations that conduct
malign activities in the Arabian Gulf region, and around the
globe, even while the United States engages in negotiations
with Iran relating to Iran's nuclear program;
(9) the United States Government should not enter into a
contract with any person or entity that is determined to have
violated United States sanctions laws with respect to
contracting with the Government of Iran and should encourage
United States allies, partners, and other countries to
maintain the same contracting standard; and
(10) a comprehensive agreement with Iran relating to Iran's
efforts to develop or acquire a nuclear weapons capability
should be agreed to by the United States only if--
(A) Iran ceases the enrichment of uranium;
(B) Iran has ceased the pursuit, acquisition, and
development of, and has verifiably dismantled its nuclear,
biological, and chemical weapons and ballistic missiles and
ballistic missile launch technology; and
(C) the Government of Iran has ceased providing support for
acts of international terrorism.

SEC. 1265. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MODERNIZATION OF DEFENSE
CAPABILITIES OF POLAND.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The efforts of Poland to modernize its defense
capabilities and restructure its armed forces have the
potential not only to enhance the national security of Poland
but also to strengthen the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO).
(2) The main priority of Poland with respect to such
efforts is to procure anti-aircraft and missile defense
systems.
(3) At a time when most NATO allies are cutting defense
spending, Poland has maintained a steady defense budget and
is making significant investment in procurement of new
defense systems.
(4) The United States should recognize the efforts of
Poland to modernize its defense capabilities and restructure
its armed forces and promote such efforts as a positive
example for other NATO allies to follow.
(5) The United States has enjoyed a close cultural,
economic, political, and military relationship with Poland
for many years and the efforts of Poland to modernize its
defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces provide
opportunities for the two countries to work together even
more closely.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the President should seek to work with Poland to ensure
that, as part of the efforts of Poland to modernize its
defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces--
(A) Poland, to the maximum extent practicable, procures
defense systems that are interoperable with NATO defense
systems and will help fill critical NATO shortfalls; and
(B) Poland, to the maximum extent practicable and to the
extent not inconsistent with the provisions of subparagraph
(A), procures United States defense systems that--
(i) will strengthen the bilateral, strategic partnership
between the two countries;
(ii) will provide Poland with proven defense systems
capabilities; and
(iii) promote deeper and closer bilateral cooperation
between the two countries; and
(2) the United States stands ready to assist Poland to
achieve its goals to modernize its defense capabilities and
restructure its armed forces.

TITLE XIII--COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION
PROGRAMS AND FUNDS.

(a) Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction
Programs.--For purposes of section 301 and other provisions
of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the
programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
(b) Fiscal Year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction Funds
Defined.--As used in this title, the term ``fiscal year 2015
Cooperative Threat Reduction funds'' means the funds
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 301 and made available by the funding table in
section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs.
(c) Availability of Funds.--Funds appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made
available by the funding table in section 4301 for
Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for
obligation for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.

SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS.

(a) Funding for Specific Purposes.--Of the $365,108,000
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense
for fiscal year 2015 in section 301 and made available by the
funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat
Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated
for the purposes specified:
(1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $1,000,000.
(2) For chemical weapons destruction, $15,720,000.
(3) For global nuclear security, $17,703,000.
(4) For cooperative biological engagement, $254,342,000.
(5) For proliferation prevention, $46,124,000.
(6) For threat reduction engagement, $2,375,000.
(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/
Administrative Costs, $27,844,000.
(b) Report on Obligation or Expenditure of Funds for Other
Purposes.--No fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction
funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a
purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection
(a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of
Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which
the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of
funds to be obligated or expended.

[[Page H4600]]

Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as
authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2015
Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which
the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically
prohibited under this title or any other provision of law.
(c) Limited Authority to Vary Individual Amounts.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in
which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is
necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary
may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for a
purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection
(a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for that
purpose.
(2) Notice-and-wait required.--An obligation of funds for a
purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection
(a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such
purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph
(1) only after--
(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the
intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the
justification for doing so; and
(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the
notification.

SEC. 1303. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR
COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH
RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2015 for Cooperative Threat Reduction may be
obligated or expended for cooperative threat reduction
activities with the Russian Federation until the date that is
30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense
certifies, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to
the appropriate congressional committees that--
(1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no
longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
(2) the Russian Federation is no longer acting
inconsistently with the INF Treaty; and
(3) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE
Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of
its treaty obligations.
(b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Defense may waive the
limitation in subsection (a) if--
(1) the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the
Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional
committees--
(A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national
security interest of the United States and a description of
the national security interest covered by the waiver; and
(B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot
make the certification under subsection (a); and
(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on
which the Secretary of Defense submits the information in the
report under paragraph (1)(B).
(c) Exception for Certain Military Bases.--The
certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of
subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the
Russian Federation in Ukraine's Crimean peninsula operating
in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and
Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory
of Ukraine.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term
``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(2) CFE treaty.--The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty
on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris
November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(3) INF treaty.--The term ``INF Treaty'' means the Treaty
Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-
Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at
Washington December 8, 1987 and entered into force June 1,
1988.
(e) Effective Date.--This section takes effect on the date
of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to
funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of
such date of enactment.

TITLE XIV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A--Military Programs

SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as
specified in the funding table in section 4501.

SEC. 1402. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION,
DEFENSE.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense
for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided
for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense,
as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b) Use.--Amounts authorized to be appropriated under
subsection (a) are authorized for--
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical Agents and munitions
in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense
Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the
United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such
Act.

SEC. 1403. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES,
DEFENSE-WIDE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-
Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding
table in section 4501.

SEC. 1404. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the
Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not
otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector
General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the
funding table in section 4501.

SEC. 1405. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the
funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces
and other activities and agencies of the Department of
Defense in providing for the health of eligible
beneficiaries.

Subtitle B--National Defense Stockpile

SEC. 1411. REVISIONS TO PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED DISPOSALS FROM
THE NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE.

(a) Fiscal Year 1999 Disposal Authority.--Section
3303(a)(7) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261;
50 U.S.C. 98d note), as most recently amended by section
1412(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat.
4649), is further amended by striking ``1,386,000,000 by the
end of fiscal year 2016'' and inserting ``$1,436,000,000 by
the end of fiscal year 2019''.
(b) Fiscal Year 2000 Disposal Authority.--Section
3402(b)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106-65; 50 U.S.C. 98d note), as
most recently amended by section 1412 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;125
Stat. 1654), is further amended by striking ``$830,000,000 by
the end of fiscal year 2016'' and inserting ``$850,000,000 by
the end of 2019''.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

SEC. 1421. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR
CAPTAIN JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER,
ILLINOIS.

(a) Authority for Transfer of Funds.--Of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available
for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance,
$146,857,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense
to the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans
Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by
subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84;
123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such
section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as
amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the
purpose of such a transfer.
(b) Use of Transferred Funds.--For the purposes of
subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for
which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are
operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care
Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs
Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and
supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal
medical facility under an operational agreement covered by
section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417;
122 Stat. 4500).

SEC. 1422. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES
RETIREMENT HOME.

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund
the sum of $63,400,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces
Retirement Home.

TITLE XV--AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 1501. PURPOSE.

The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations
for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 to provide
additional funds for overseas contingency operations being
carried out by the Armed Forces.

SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and
the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities
in the amount of $6,180,000,000.

SEC. 1503. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other
activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and
maintenance in the amount of $64,040,000,000. In addition to
the authorization of appropriations in the preceding
sentence, funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal year 2015 for the Department of the Air Force for the
purpose of maintaining, operating, and upgrading the A-10
aircraft fleet in the amount of $635,000,000.

SEC. 1504. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

SEC. 1505. OTHER APPROPRIATIONS.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated

[[Page H4601]]

for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for
expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Other
Authorizations in the amount of $1,450,000,000.
(b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Other
Authorizations'' means the Defense Health Program, Drug
Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, and
National Guard and Reserve Equipment.

Subtitle B--Financial Matters

SEC. 1511. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS.

The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are
in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be
appropriated by this Act.

SEC. 1512. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

Subtitle C--Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters

SEC. 1521. CONTINUATION OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF
FUNDS IN THE AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND.

Funds available to the Department of Defense for the
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2015 shall
be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b)
through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-181;
122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike
Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4424).

SEC. 1522. USE OF AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM JOINT IMPROVISED
EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND.

Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
(Public Law 109-364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the
amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law
110-417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the funds made
available to the Department of Defense for the Joint
Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2015.

TITLE XVI--STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, CYBER, AND INTELLIGENCE MATTERS

Subtitle A--Space Activities

SEC. 1601. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE
PROGRAM.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the Sense of Congress that--
(1) critical United States national security space systems
are facing a serious growing foreign threat;
(2) the People's Republic of China and the Russian
Federation are both developing capabilities to disrupt the
use of space by the United States in a conflict, as recently
outlined by the Director of National Intelligence in
testimony before Congress; and
(3) a fully-developed multi-faceted space security and
defense program is needed to deter and defeat any
adversaries' acts of space aggression.
(b) Report on Ability of the United States to Deter and
Defeat Adversary Space Aggression.--Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a report containing an assessment of the ability of the
Department of Defense to deter and defeat any act of space
aggression by an adversary.
(c) Study on Alternative Defense and Deterrence Strategies
in Response to Foreign Counterspace Capabilities.--
(1) Study required.--The Secretary of Defense, acting
through the Office of Net Assessment, shall conduct a study
of potential alternative defense and deterrent strategies in
response to the existing and projected counterspace
capabilities of China and Russia. Such study shall include an
assessment of the congruence of such strategies with the
current United States defense strategy and defense programs
of record, and the associated implications of pursuing such
strategies.
(2) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the congressional defense committees the results of the
study required under paragraph (1).

SEC. 1602. EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE NOTIFICATION.

(a) Notification.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall
provide to the appropriate congressional committees notice of
each change to the evolved expendable launch vehicle
acquisition plan and schedule from the plan and schedule
included in the budget submitted by the President under
section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year
2015. Such notification shall include--
(1) an identification of the change;
(2) a national security rationale for the change;
(3) the impact of the change on the evolved expendable
launch vehicle block buy contract;
(4) the impact of the change on the opportunities for
competition for certified evolved expendable launch vehicle
launch providers; and
(5) the costs or savings of the change.
(b) Applicability.--The requirement under subsection (a)
shall apply to fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees.--In this section,
the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
(1) the congressional defense committees; and
(2) with respect to a change to the evolved expendable
launch vehicle acquisition schedule for an intelligence-
related launch, the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 1603. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS RESPONSIBILITIES OF
EXECUTIVE AGENT FOR SPACE.

The Secretary of Defense shall, not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, revise
Department of Defense directives and guidance to require the
Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space to ensure
that in developing space strategies, architectures, and
programs for satellite communications, the Executive Agent
shall--
(1) conduct strategic planning to ensure the Department of
Defense is effectively and efficiently meeting the satellite
communications requirements of the military departments and
commanders of the combatant commands;
(2) coordinate with the secretaries of the military
departments and the heads of Defense Agencies to eliminate
duplication of effort and to ensure that resources are used
to achieve the maximum effort in related satellite
communication science and technology; research, development,
test and evaluation; production; and operations and
sustainment;
(3) coordinate with the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Chief
Information Officer of the Department to ensure that
effective and efficient acquisition approaches are being used
to acquire military and commercial satellite communications
for the Department, including space, ground, and user
terminal integration; and
(4) coordinate with the chairman of the Joint Requirements
Oversight Council to develop a process to identify the
current and projected satellite communications requirements
of the Department.

SEC. 1604. LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
the Secretary of Defense should develop a next-generation
liquid rocket engine that--
(1) is made in the United States;
(2) meets the requirements of the national security space
community;
(3) is developed by not later than 2019;
(4) is developed using full and open competition; and
(5) is available for purchase by all space launch providers
of the United States.
(b) Development.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall develop a
next-generation liquid rocket engine that enables the
effective, efficient, and expedient transition from the use
of non-allied space launch engines to a domestic alternative
for national security space launches.
(2) Authorization of appropriations.--Of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year
2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air
Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4201,
$220,000,000 shall be available for the Secretary of Defense
to develop a next-generation liquid rocket engine.
(c) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate with the
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, to the extent practicable, to ensure that the
rocket engine developed under subsection (b) meets objectives
that are common to both the national security space community
and the space program of the United States.
(d) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with
the Administrator, shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report that includes--
(1) a plan to carry out the development of the rocket
engine under subsection (b), including an analysis of the
benefits of using public-private partnerships;
(2) the requirements of the program to develop such rocket
engine; and
(3) the estimated cost of such rocket engine.
(e) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means the following:
(1) The congressional defense committees.
(2) The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce,
Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
(3) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate.

SEC. 1605. PILOT PROGRAM FOR ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL
SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SERVICES.

(a) Pilot Program.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense may develop and
carry out a pilot program to determine the feasibility and
advisability of expanding the use of working capital funds by
the Secretary to effectively and efficiently acquire
commercial satellite capabilities to meet the requirements of
the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant
commanders.
(2) Funding.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
for any of fiscal years 2015

[[Page H4602]]

through 2020 for the Department of Defense for the
acquisition of commercial satellite communications, not more
than $50,000,000 may be obligated or expended for such pilot
program during such a fiscal year.
(3) Certain authorities.--In carrying out the pilot program
under paragraph (1), the Secretary may not use the
authorities provided in sections 2208(k) and 2210(b) of title
10, United States Code.
(b) Goals.--In developing and carrying out the pilot
program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall ensure
that the pilot program--
(1) provides a cost effective and strategic method to
acquire commercial satellite services;
(2) incentivizes private-sector participation and
investment in technologies to meet future requirements of the
Department of Defense with respect to commercial satellite
services;
(3) takes into account the potential for a surge or other
change in the demand of the Department for commercial
satellite communications access in response to global or
regional events; and
(4) ensures the ability of the Secretary to control and
account for the cost of programs and work performed under the
pilot program.
(c) Duration.--If the Secretary commences the pilot program
under subsection (a)(1), the pilot program shall terminate on
October 1, 2020.
(d) Reports.--
(1) Initial report.--Not later than 150 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report that includes a
plan and schedule to carry out the pilot program under
subsection (a)(1).
(2) Final report.--Not later than December 1, 2020, the
Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the pilot program under subsection
(a)(1). The report shall include--
(A) an assessment of expanding the use of working capital
funds to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial
satellite capabilities to meet the requirements of the
military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant
commanders; and
(B) a description of--
(i) any contract entered into under the pilot program, the
funding used under such contract, and the efficiencies
realized under such contract;
(ii) the advantages and challenges of using working capital
funds as described in subparagraph (A);
(iii) any additional authorities the Secretary determines
necessary to acquire commercial satellite capabilities as
described in subsection (a)(1); and
(iv) any recommendations of the Secretary with respect to
improving or extending the pilot program.

Subtitle B--Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities

SEC. 1611. ASSESSMENT AND LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS
FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS OF
UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND AND
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES.

(a) Assessment.--
(1) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense, acting through
the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low
Intensity Conflict, and the Director of the Defense
Intelligence Agency, shall submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress an assessment of the intelligence
activities and programs of United States Special Operations
Command and special operations forces.
(2) Inclusions.--The assessment under paragraph (1) shall
include each of the following elements:
(A) An overall strategy defining such intelligence
activities and programs, including definitions of
intelligence activities and programs unique to special
operations.
(B) A validated strategy and roadmap of intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance programs and requirements
for special operations across the future years defense
program.
(C) A comprehensive description of current and anticipated
future Joint Staff validated requirements for the
intelligence activities and programs of each geographic
combatant commander within the respective geographic area of
such covered combatant commander to be fulfilled by special
operations forces, including those that can only be addressed
by special operations forces, programs, or capabilities.
(D) Validated present and planned United States Special
Operations Command force structure requirements to meet
current and anticipated special operations intelligence
activities and programs of geographic combatant commanders.
(E) A comprehensive review and assessment of statutory
authorities, and Department and interagency policies,
including limitations, for special operations forces
intelligence activities and programs.
(F) An independent, comprehensive cost estimate of special
operations intelligence activities and programs by the
Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the
Department of Defense, including an estimate of the costs of
the period of the current future years defense program,
including a description of all rules and assumptions used to
develop the cost estimates.
(G) A copy of any memoranda of understanding or memoranda
of agreement between the Department of Defense and other
departments or agencies of the United States Government, or
between components of the Department of Defense that are
required to implement objectives of special operations
intelligence activities and programs.
(H) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.
(3) Form.--The assessment required under paragraph (1)
shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.
(b) Limitations.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), not more than 50
percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this
Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for
procurement, Defense-wide, or research, development, test,
and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the major force program 11
of the United States Special Operations Command may be
obligated until the assessment required under subsection (a)
is submitted.
(2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect
to funds authorized to be appropriated for Overseas
Contingency Operations under title XV.
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Appropriate committees of congress.--The term
``appropriate committees of congress'' means the
congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives,
and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(2) Future years defense program.--The term ``future years
defense program'' means the future years defense program
under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(3) Geographic combatant commander.--The term ``geographic
combatant commander'' means a commander of a combatant
command (as defined in section 161(c) of title 10, United
States Code) with a geographic area of responsibility.

SEC. 1612. ANNUAL BRIEFING ON THE INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE,
AND RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMBATANT COMMANDS.

At the same time that the President's budget is submitted
pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code,
for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020--
(1) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide
to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives,
and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a
briefing on--
(A) the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of
each of the combatant commands;
(B) for the year preceding the year in which the briefing
is provided, the satisfaction rate of each of the combatant
commands with the intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance requirements, by specific intelligence
capability type, of such combatant command; and
(C) a risk analysis identifying the critical gaps and
shortfalls in such requirements in relation to such
satisfaction rate; and
(2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall
provide to the congressional defense committees, the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate a briefing on short-term, mid-term, and long-term
strategies to address the critical intelligence, surveillance
and reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands.

SEC. 1613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF REPORT ON IMAGERY
INTELLIGENCE AND GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION SUPPORT
PROVIDED TO REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND SECURITY
ALLIANCES.

Section 921(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1878) is
amended by striking ``2014 and 2015'' and inserting ``2014
through 2016''.

SEC. 1614. TACTICAL EXPLOITATION OF NATIONAL CAPABILITIES
EXECUTIVE AGENT.

Subchapter I of chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``Sec. 430. TENCAP executive agent

``(a) In General.--There is in the Department of Defense a
Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive
Agent who shall be appointed by the Under Secretary of
Defense for Intelligence. The Executive Agent shall report
directly to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.
The Executive Agent shall be responsible for working with the
combatant commands, military services, and the intelligence
community to develop methods to increase warfighter
effectiveness through the exploitation of national
capabilities and to promote cross-domain integration of such
capabilities into military operations, training,
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance activities.
``(b) Annual Briefing.--At the same time as the budget
materials are submitted to Congress in connection with the
submission of the budget for each of fiscal years 2016
through 2020, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the
Executive Agent, in coordination with the commanders of the
combatant commands, the Secretaries of the military
departments, and the heads of the Department of Defense
intelligence agencies and offices, shall provide to the
Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate and the Committee on Armed
Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
of the House of Representatives a briefing on the
investments, activities, challenges, and opportunities of the
Executive Agent in carrying out the responsibilities under
paragraph (1). The briefings shall be coordinated with each
of the armed services, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the
National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-
Intelligence Agency, and the National Reconnaissance
office.''.

SEC. 1615. AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATION.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence
Center provides essential national expertise on foreign
aerospace system capabilities,

[[Page H4603]]

including cyber, space systems, missiles, and aircraft.
(2) The Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence
Center is organizationally aligned to the Headquarters Air
Staff, through the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and
Reconnaissance Agency.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence
Center provides indispensable intelligence support to a
variety of customers, including the Air Force, the Department
of Defense, the intelligence community, and national
policymakers; and
(2) to maintain operational effectiveness, the Air Force
organizational reporting structure of the Air Force National
Air and Space Intelligence Center should remain
organizationally aligned to the Headquarters Air Staff with
reporting through the Vice Chief of Staff.
(c) Plan.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall
submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of
the Senate a strategic plan for the intelligence organization
of the Air Force, including maintaining the National Air and
Space Intelligence Center alignment to the Headquarters Air
Staff.

SEC. 1616. PROHIBITION ON NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM
CONSOLIDATION.

(a) Prohibition.--No amounts authorized to be appropriated
or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may
be used during the period beginning on the date of the
enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to
execute--
(1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program
budget from the Department of Defense budget;
(2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program
budget within the Department of Defense budget; or
(3) the establishment of a new appropriations account or
appropriations account structure for the National
Intelligence Program budget.
(b) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) National intelligence program.--The term ``National
Intelligence Program'' has the meaning given the term in
section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C.
3003).
(2) National intelligence program budget.--The term
``National Intelligence Program budget'' means the portions
of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the
National Intelligence Program.

Subtitle C--Cyberspace-Related Matters

SEC. 1621. EXECUTIVE AGENT FOR CYBER TEST AND TRAINING
RANGES.

(a) Executive Agent.--Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall designate a senior official of the Department of
Defense to act as the executive agent for cyber and
information technology test and training ranges.
(b) Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities.--
(1) Establishment.--Not later than one year after the
enactment of this Act, and in accordance with Directive
5101.1, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the roles,
responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent
designated under subsection (a).
(2) Specification.--The roles and responsibilities of the
executive agent designated under subsection (a) shall include
each of the following:
(A) Developing and maintaining a comprehensive list of
cyber and information technology ranges, test facilities,
test beds, and other means of testing, training, and
developing software, personnel, and tools for accommodating
the mission of the Department.
(B) Serving as a single entity to organize and manage
designated cyber and information technology test ranges,
including--
(i) establishing the priorities for cyber and information
technology ranges to meet Department objectives;
(ii) enforcing standards to meet requirements specified by
the United States Cyber Command, the training community, and
the research, development, testing, and evaluation community;
(iii) identifying and offering guidance on the
opportunities for integration amongst the designated cyber
and information technology ranges regarding test, training,
and development functions;
(iv) finding opportunities for cost reduction, integration,
and coordination improvements for the appropriate cyber and
information technology ranges;
(v) adding or consolidating cyber and information
technology ranges in the future to better meet the evolving
needs of the cyber strategy and resource requirements of the
Department; and
(vi) coordinating with interagency and industry partners on
cyber and information technology range issues.
(C) Defining a cyber range architecture that--
(i) may add or consolidate cyber and information technology
ranges in the future to better meet the evolving needs of the
cyber strategy and resource requirements of the Department;
(ii) coordinates with interagency and industry partners on
cyber and information technology range issues;
(iii) allows for integrated closed loop testing in a secure
environment of cyber and electronic warfare capabilities;
(iv) supports science and technology development,
experimentation, testing and training; and
(v) provides for interconnection with other existing cyber
ranges and other kinetic range facilities in a distributed
manner.
(D) Certifying all cyber range investments of the
Department of Defense.
(E) Performing such other roles and responsibilities as the
Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(c) Support Within Department of Defense.--In accordance
with Directive 5101.1, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure
that the military departments, Defense Agencies, and other
components of the Department of Defense provide the executive
agent designated under subsection (a) with the appropriate
support and resources needed to perform the roles,
responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``designated cyber and information technology
range'' includes the National Cyber Range, the Joint
Information Operations Range, the Defense Information
Assurance Range, and the C4 Assessments Division of J6 of the
Joint Staff.
(2) The term ``Directive 5101.1'' means Department of
Directive 5101.1, or any successor directive relating to the
responsibilities of an executive agent of the Department of
Defense.
(3) The term ``executive agent'' has the meaning given the
term ``DoD Executive Agent'' in Directive 5101.1.

Subtitle D--Nuclear Forces

SEC. 1631. PREPARATION OF ANNUAL BUDGET REQUEST REGARDING
NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

Section 179(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
``(3)(A) With respect to the preparation of a budget for a
fiscal year to be submitted by the President to Congress
under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of Defense
may not agree to a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear
budget request authority unless the Secretary of Defense
submits to the congressional defense committees a
certification described in subparagraph (B).
``(B) A certification described in this subparagraph is a
certification that includes the following:
``(i) Certification that, during the fiscal year prior to
the fiscal year covered by the budget for which the
certification is submitted, the Secretary of Energy obligated
or expended any amounts covered by a proposed transfer of
estimated nuclear budget request authority made for such
prior fiscal year in a manner consistent with a memorandum of
agreement that was developed by the Nuclear Weapons Council
and entered into by the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Energy.
``(ii) A detailed assessment by the Nuclear Weapons Council
regarding how the Administrator for Nuclear Security
implemented any agreements and decisions of the Council made
during such prior fiscal year.
``(iii) An assessment from each of the Vice Chairman of the
Joints Chiefs of Staff and the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command regarding any effects to the military
during such prior fiscal year that were caused by the delay
or failure of the Administrator to implement any agreements
or decisions described in clause (ii).
``(4) The Secretary of Defense shall include with the
defense budget materials for a fiscal year the memorandum of
agreement described in paragraph (3)(B)(i) that covers such
fiscal year.
``(5)(A) Not later than 30 days after the President submits
to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under section
1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff an assessment of--
``(i) whether such budget allows the Federal Government to
meet the nuclear stockpile and stockpile stewardship program
requirements during the fiscal year covered by the budget and
the four subsequent fiscal years; and
``(ii) if the Commander determines that such budget does
not allow the Federal Government to meet such requirements, a
description of the steps being taken to meet such
requirements.
``(B) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assessment
of the Commander of the United States Strategic Command under
subparagraph (A), the Chairman shall submit to the
congressional defense committees--
``(i) such assessment as it was submitted to the Chairman;
and
``(ii) any comments of the Chairman.
``(6) In this subsection:
``(A) The term `budget' has the meaning given that term in
section 231(f) of this title.
``(B) The term `defense budget materials' has the meaning
given that term in section 231(f) of this title.
``(C) The term `proposed transfer of estimated nuclear
budget request authority' means, in preparing a budget, a
request for the Secretary of Defense to transfer an estimated
amount of the proposed budget authority of the Secretary to
the Secretary of Energy for purposes relating to nuclear
weapons.''.

SEC. 1632. INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE PERSONNEL RELIABILITY
PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND THE
HUMAN RELIABILITY PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENERGY.

(a) Review.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Energy shall jointly seek to enter into a
contract with a federally funded research and development
center to conduct an independent review of the personnel
reliability program of the Department of Defense and the
human reliability program of the Department of Energy.
(2) Matters included.--The review under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) An examination of the costs and benefits of each
program described in paragraph (1).
(B) Examples of successes and failures for each such
program.

[[Page H4604]]

(C) The reporting and administrative requirements of each
such program.
(D) The authorities and responsibilities of the commanders
and managers of each such program.
(E) Guidance for when certain positions must be included in
each such program.
(F) Recommendations with respect to making each such
program more effective, more efficient, and, to the extent
appropriate, more consistent between the Departments.
(G) Any other matters the Secretaries jointly determine
appropriate.
(b) Report.--Not later than October 1, 2015, the
Secretaries shall jointly submit to the congressional defense
committees such review.

SEC. 1633. ASSESSMENT OF NUCLEAR WEAPON SECONDARY
REQUIREMENT.

(a) Assessment.--The Secretary of Defense, in coordination
with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander of the United
States Strategic Command, shall assess the annual secondary
production requirement needed to sustain a safe, secure,
reliable, and effective nuclear deterrent.
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander
of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report regarding the
assessment conducted under subsection (a).
(2) Matters included.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
include the following:
(A) An explanation of the rationale and assumptions that
led to the current 50 to 80 secondaries per year production
requirement, including the factors considered in determining
such requirement.
(B) An analysis of whether there are any changes to such 50
to 80 secondaries per year production requirement, including
the reasons for any such changes.
(C) A description of how the secondary production
requirement is affected by or related to--
(i) the demands of stockpile modernization, including the
schedule for life extension programs;
(ii) the requirement for a responsive infrastructure,
including the ability to hedge against technical failure and
geopolitical risk; and
(iii) the number of secondaries held in reserve or the
inactive stockpile, and the likelihood such secondaries may
be reused.
(E) The proposed time frame for achieving such 50 to 80
secondaries per year production requirement.
(3) Form.--The report under paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified
annex.

SEC. 1634. RETENTION OF MISSILE SILOS.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the Sense of Congress that
recent authorization and appropriations Acts passed by
Congress and signed by the President have promulgated a
national policy that it is in the national security interests
of the United States to retain the maximum number of land-
based strategic missile silos and their associated
infrastructure to ensure that billions of dollars in prior
taxpayer investments for such silos and infrastructure are
not lost through precipitous actions which may be budget-
driven, cyclical, and not in the long-term strategic
interests of the United States.
(b) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall preserve
each intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a
deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act
in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to--
(1) remain a fully functioning element of the
interconnected and redundant command and control system of
the missile field; and
(2) be made fully operational with a deployed missile.
(c) Termination.--The requirement in subsection (b) shall
terminate on February 5, 2021.

SEC. 1635. CERTIFICATION ON NUCLEAR FORCE STRUCTURE.

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in
coordination with the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command, shall certify to the congressional defense
committees that the plan for implementation of the New START
Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of title 10,
United States Code) announced on April 8, 2014, will enable
the United States to meet its obligations under such treaty
in a manner that ensures the nuclear forces of the United
States--
(1) are capable, survivable, and balanced; and
(2) maintain strategic stability, deterrence and extended
deterrence, and allied assurance.

Subtitle E--Missile Defense Programs

SEC. 1641. THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE OF ALLIES OF THE
UNITED STATES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) A Patriot battery of the United States providing a
short-range air and missile defense capability has previously
been rotationally deployed to Poland, pursuant to an
agreement between the United States and the Government of
Poland, during a period occurring between 2010 to 2012.
(2) The deployment of the Patriot battery did not include
operational missiles and was not replaced with another short-
range air and missile defense system upon completion of the
deployment rotation in 2012.
(b) Policy.--It is the policy of the United States that
available short-range air and missile defense systems and
terminal missile defense systems of the United States with
operational missiles be rotationally deployed to central and
eastern European allies, pursuant to agreements between the
United States and such allies, to strengthen the air and
missile defense capabilities of such allies, as appropriate.
(c) Aegis Ashore System.--
(1) In general.--Not later than December 31, 2016, and
pursuant to an agreement between the United States and the
Government of Poland, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure
the operational availability of the Aegis Ashore system site
in Poland.
(2) Relocation of assets.--The Secretary may relocate the
necessary assets of the Aegis weapon system between and
within the DDG-51 Class Destroyer program and the Aegis
Ashore program to meet mission requirements.
(3) Briefings.--The Secretary shall provide to the
appropriate congressional committees quarterly briefings to
update the status of the progress in carrying out paragraph
(1).
(4) Transfer authority.--The Secretary may use the
authority provided under section 1001 to carry out this
subsection.
(d) Missile Defense Capability of Poland.--
(1) Deployment.--Not later than December 31, 2014, and
pursuant to an agreement between the United States and the
Government of Poland, the Secretary of Defense shall deploy
to Poland a system providing a short-range air and missile
defense capability or terminal missile defense capability, or
both, and the personnel required to operate and maintain such
system.
(2) Removal.--No action may be taken to effect or implement
the removal of the system or the personnel described in
paragraph (1) unless--
(A) at least 30 days before the removal, the Secretary of
Defense notifies the appropriate congressional committees
that such removal is in the national security interests of
the United States; or
(B) the removal is requested by the Government of Poland in
the manner provided in the agreement between the United
States and the Government of Poland regarding the system and
personnel.
(e) Notification.--The Secretary of Defense shall notify
the appropriate congressional committees by not later than 60
days after the date on which a NATO member state makes a
request that communicates to the Secretary the interest of
the member state in hosting missile defense capabilities
described in subsection (b) and the plan of the Secretary for
addressing such request.
(f) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means the following:
(1) The congressional defense committees.
(2) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

SEC. 1642. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF
CAPABILITY ENHANCEMENT II EXOATMOSPHERIC KILL
VEHICLE.

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense
should not procure an additional capability enhancement II
exoatmospheric kill vehicle for deployment until after the
date on which a successful intercept flight test of the
capability enhancement II ground-based interceptor has
occurred, unless such procurement is for test assets or to
maintain a warm line for the industrial base.

TITLE XVII--DEFENSE AUDIT ADVISORY PANEL ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
AUDITABILITY

SEC. 1701. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) Congress remains steadfast in supporting the continuing
efforts of the Department of Defense to produce auditable
financial statements. Such efforts are essential to ensure
taxpayers dollars are accounted for at the largest department
of the Federal Government
(2) As the 2017 and 2019 statutory audit deadlines
approach, Congress believes an advisory panel is necessary to
better track the Department's progress.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of the Advisory Panel are--
(1) to work on behalf of Congress to actively monitor the
audit readiness work of the Department of Defense and, after
September 30, 2017, the Department's 2018 audit; and
(2) to regularly providing interim findings and
recommendations to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives, with the purpose of
making the Department auditable and aiding in oversight of
the Department by such Committees.

SEC. 1702. ESTABLISHMENT OF ADVISORY PANEL ON DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE AUDIT READINESS.

(a) Establishment.--There is established the Advisory Panel
on Department of Defense Audit Readiness (in this title
referred to as the ``Advisory Panel'').
(b) Membership.--
(1) Composition.--The Advisory Panel shall be composed of
10 members, of whom--
(A) two shall be appointed jointly by the Chairman of the
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Chairman of
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives, in consultation with the Ranking Member of
each such Committee, from among members of different
political parties from each such Committee, to serve as Co-
Chairmen of the Advisory Panel;
(B) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee
on Armed Services of the Senate;
(C) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(D) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee
on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and
(E) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the
Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.

[[Page H4605]]

(2) Appointment date.--The appointments of the members of
the Advisory Panel shall be made not later than 30 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) Qualifications.--Appointments to the Advisory Panel
shall be made from among individuals who are certified public
accountants and have work experience within the Department of
Defense or private financial management sectors. An
individual who is an officer or employee of the Federal
Government may not be appointed to the Advisory Panel.
(c) Period of Appointment; Vacancies.--Members shall be
appointed for the life of the Advisory Panel. Any vacancy in
the Advisory Panel shall not affect its powers, but shall be
filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
(d) Initial Meeting.--Not later than 60 days after the date
on which all members of the Advisory Panel have been
appointed, the Advisory Panel shall hold its first meeting.
(e) Meetings.--The Advisory Panel shall meet regularly at
the call of the Co-Chairmen.
(f) Quorum.--Five members of the Advisory Panel shall
constitute a quorum, but four members may hold hearings.

SEC. 1703. DUTIES OF THE ADVISORY PANEL.

(a) In General.--The duties of the Advisory Panel are as
follows:
(1) To provide the Secretary of Defense, through the Under
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), independent advice on the
Department's financial management, including the financial
reporting process, systems of internal controls, audit
process, and processes for monitoring compliance with
applicable laws and regulations.
(2) To identify, review, and evaluate the work of the
Department of Defense (including the work of each military
department and Defense Agency) on auditability.
(3) To identify problem areas and recommend solutions in
order to aid the Department in meeting the following
statutory deadlines:
(A) By not later than September 30, 2017, validating the
financial statements of the Department of Defense as ready
for audit, as required by section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note).
(B) By not later than March 31, 2019, auditing the
financial statements of the Department of Defense for fiscal
year 2018, as required by section 1003(a)(2)(a)(iii) of such
Act (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note)
(4) To provide briefings regularly to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives
on the Advisory Panel's findings, analysis, and
recommendations.
(b) Reports.--Not later than March 31 and September 30 of
each year during the life of the Advisory Panel, beginning
with March 31, 2015, the Advisory Panel shall submit to the
congressional defense committees findings and conclusions of
the Advisory Panel as a result of its work under subsection
(a) during the period covered by the report, together with
such recommendations as it considers appropriate.
(c) Authority of Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller).--In accordance with Department policy and
procedures, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is
authorized to act upon the advice emanating from the Advisory
Panel.

SEC. 1704. POWERS OF THE ADVISORY PANEL.

(a) Hearings.--The Advisory Panel may hold such hearings,
sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony,
and receive such evidence as the Advisory Panel considers
advisable to carry out this title.
(b) Information From Department of Defense.--The Advisory
Panel may secure directly from the Department of Defense such
information as the Advisory Panel considers necessary to
carry out this title. Upon request of the Co-Chairmen of the
Advisory Panel, the Secretary of Defense shall furnish such
information to the Advisory Panel.
(c) Postal Services.--The Advisory Panel may use the United
States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions
as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government.

SEC. 1705. ADVISORY PANEL PERSONNEL MATTERS.

(a) Compensation of Members.--Members of the Advisory Panel
shall serve without compensation for such service.
(b) Travel Expenses.--Each member of the Advisory Panel
shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu
of subsistence, in accordance with applicable provisions
under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States
Code.
(c) Staff.--
(1) Director.--The Advisory Panel may have a Director, who
shall be appointed by the Co-Chairmen.
(2) Staff.--The Co-Chairmen may appoint such additional
staff as may be necessary to enable the Advisory Panel to
perform its duties, except that the number of staff may not
exceed the equivalent of five full-time employees.
(3) Compensation.--The Co-Chairmen of the Advisory Panel
may fix the compensation of the Director and other personnel
without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53
of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification of
positions and General Schedule pay rates, except that the
rate of pay for the Director and other personnel may not
exceed the rate payable for level IV of the Executive
Schedule under section 5315 of such title.
(d) Detail of Government Employees.--Any Federal Government
employee may be detailed to the Advisory Panel without
reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption
or loss of civil service status or privilege.
(e) Procurement of Temporary and Intermittent Services.--
The Co-Chairmen of the Advisory Panel may procure temporary
and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5,
United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not
exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay
prescribed for level V of the Executive Schedule under
section 5316 of such title.

SEC. 1706. TERMINATION OF THE ADVISORY PANEL.

The Advisory Panel shall terminate April 30, 2019.

DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE.

This division may be cited as the ``Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015''.

SEC. 2002. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED
TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW.

(a) Expiration of Authorizations After Three Years.--Except
as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained
in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction
projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and
facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations
of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of--
(1) October 1, 2017; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for military construction for fiscal year 2018.
(b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to
authorizations for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and
contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program (and authorizations of
appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have
been obligated before the later of--
(1) October 1, 2017; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for fiscal year 2018 for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or
contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program.

SEC. 2003. EFFECTIVE DATE.

Titles XXI through XXVII shall take effect on the later
of--
(1) October 1, 2014; or
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act.

TITLE XXI--ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2103 and available for military construction projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.................... Concord............... $15,200,000
Fort Irwin............ $45,000,000
Colorado...................... Fort Carson........... $89,000,000
Hawaii........................ Fort Shafter.......... $83,000,000
Kentucky...................... Blue Grass Army Depot. $15,000,000
Fort Campbell......... $23,000,000
New York...................... Fort Drum............. $27,000,000
Pennsylvania.................. Letterkenny Army Depot $16,000,000
South Carolina................ Fort Jackson.......... $52,000,000
Texas......................... Fort Hood............. $46,000,000
Virginia...................... Fort Lee.............. $86,000,000

[[Page H4606]]

Joint Base Langley- $7,700,000
Eustis...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2103 and available for military construction projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real
property and carry out the military construction project for
the installations or locations outside the United States, and
in the amount, set forth in the following table:

Army: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guantanamo Bay............... Guantanamo Bay.......... $92,800,000
Japan........................ Kadena Air Base......... $10,600,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.

(a) Construction and Acquisition.--Using amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2103 and available for military family housing
functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601,
the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family
housing units (including land acquisition and supporting
facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number
of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following
table:

Army: Family Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country Installation Units Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Illinois................................ Rock Island.............. Family Housing New $19,500,000
Construction.............
Korea................................... Camp Walker............... Family Housing New $57,800,000
Construction.............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Planning and Design.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2103 and available for military family housing functions as
specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary
of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering
services and construction design activities with respect to
the construction or improvement of family housing units in an
amount not to exceed $1,309,000.

SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning
after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the
Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in
section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section
2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost
variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the
total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection
(a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

SEC. 2104. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2004 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136;
117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for
construction of an Explosives Research and Development
Loading Facility at the installation, the Secretary of the
Army may use available unobligated balances of amounts
appropriated for military construction for the Army to
complete work on the project within the scope specified for
the project in the justification data provided to Congress as
part of the request for authorization of the project.

SEC. 2105. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECTS.

(a) Fort Drum.--In the case of the authorization contained
in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Drum, New York, for
construction of an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the
installation, the Secretary of the Army may provide a capital
contribution to a public or private utility company in order
for the utility company to extend the utility company's gas
line to the installation boundary. Such capital contribution
is not a change in the scope of work of the project under
section 2853 of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Fort Leonard Wood.--In the case of the authorization
contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division
B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Leonard
Wood, Missouri, for construction of Battalion Complex
Facilities at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may
construct the Battalion Headquarters with classrooms for a
unit other than a Global Defense Posture Realignment unit.
(c) Fort McNair.--In the case of the authorization
contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division
B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort McNair,
District of Columbia, for construction of a Vehicle Storage
Building at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may
construct up to 20,227 square feet of vehicle storage.
(d) Fort Belvoir.--The table in section 2101(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(division B of Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) is amended
in the item relating to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, by striking
``$94,000,000'' in the amount column and inserting
``$183,000,000''.

SEC. 2106. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECT.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437) and
extended by section 2109 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public
Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 988), shall remain in effect until
October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2016, whichever is later:
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georgia................................ Fort Benning.............. Land Acquisition.......... $12,200,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2107. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2012 PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2101 of that Act (125 Stat. 1661), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later:
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) as
follows:

[[Page H4607]]

Army: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georgia................................. Fort Benning.............. Land Acquisition.......... $5,100,000
Fort Benning.............. Land Acquisition.......... $25,000,000
North Carolina.......................... Fort Bragg................ Unmanned Aerial Vehicle $54,000,000
Maintenance Hanger.
Texas................................... Fort Bliss................ Applied Instruction $8,300,000
Building.
Fort Bliss................ Vehicle Maintenance $19,000,000
Facility.
Fort Hood................. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle $47,000,000
Maintenance Hanger.
Virginia................................ Fort Belvoir.............. Road and Infrastructure $25,000,000
Improvements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XXII--NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2204 and available for military construction projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Navy: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona....................................... Yuma........................................... $16,608,000
California.................................... Bridgeport..................................... $16,180,000
San Diego...................................... $47,110,000
District of Columbia.......................... Naval Support Activity......................... $31,735,000
Florida....................................... Jacksonville................................... $30,235,000
Mayport........................................ $20,520,000
Guam.......................................... Joint Region Marianas.......................... $50,651,000
Hawaii........................................ Kaneohe Bay.................................... $53,382,000
Pearl Harbor................................... $9,698,000
Maryland...................................... Annanpolis..................................... $120,112,000
Indian Head.................................... $15,346,000
Patuxent River................................. $9,860,000
Nevada........................................ Fallon......................................... $31,262,000
North Carolina................................ Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station.......... $41,588,000
Pennsylvania.................................. Philadelphia.................................. $23,985,000
South Carolina................................ Charleston..................................... $35,716,000
Virginia...................................... Dahlgren....................................... $27,313,000
Norfolk........................................ $39,274,000
Portsmouth..................................... $9,743,000
Quantico....................................... $12,613,000
Yorktown....................................... $26,988,000
Washington.................................... Bremerton...................................... $16,401,000
Port Angeles................................... $20,638,000
Whidbey Island................................. $24,390,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2204 and available for military construction projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installation or location outside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Navy: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain....................................... South West Asia................................. $27,826,000
Djibouti...................................... Camp Lemonier................................... $9,923,000
Japan......................................... Iwakuni......................................... $6,415,000
Kadena Air Base................................. $19,411,000
Marine Corps Air Station Futenma................ $4,639,000
Okinawa......................................... $35,685,000
Spain......................................... Rota............................................ $20,233,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Unspecified Worldwide.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2204 and available for military construction projects at
unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire
real property and carry out military construction projects
for unspecified locations, and in the amount, set forth in
the following table:

[[Page H4608]]

Navy: Unspecified Worldwide Locations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unspecified Worldwide Locations............... Unspecified Worldwide Locations................. $38,985,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2204 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out
architectural and engineering services and construction
design activities with respect to the construction or
improvement of family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $472,000.

SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code,
and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military
family housing functions as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing
military family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$15,940,000.

SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning
after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the
Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in
section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section
2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost
variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the
total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection
(a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS.

(a) Yuma.--In the case of the authorization contained in
the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Yuma, Arizona, for
construction of a Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, the
Secretary of the Navy may construct up to approximately
70,000 square feet of additional apron to be utilized as a
taxi-lane using amounts appropriated for this project
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).
(b) Camp Pendelton.--In the case of the authorization
contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division
B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Camp Pendelton,
California, for construction of an Infantry Squad Defense
Range, the Secretary of the Navy may construct up to 9,000
square feet of vehicular bridge using amounts appropriated
for this project pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).
(c) Kings Bay.--In the case of the authorization contained
in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Kings Bay, Georgia, for
construction of a Crab Island Security Enclave, the Secretary
of the Navy may expand the enclave fencing system to three
layers of fencing and construct two elevated fixed fighting
positions with associated supporting facilities using amounts
appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat.
1667).

SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 989), for Yorktown, Virginia, for construction of
Small Arms Ranges, the Secretary of the Navy may construct
240 square meters of armory, 48 square meters of Safety
Officer/Target Storage Building, and 667 square meters of
Range Operations Building using appropriations available for
the project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations
in section 2204 of such Act (127 Stat. 990).

SEC. 2207. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441) and
extended by section 2207 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public
Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 991), shall remain in effect until
October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for
military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is
later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain................................. South West Asia........... Navy Central Command $89,280,000
Ammunition Magazines.
Guam.................................... Naval Activities, Guam.... Defense Access Roads $66,730,000
Improvements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2208. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2012 PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2201 of that Act (125 Stat. 1666), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Navy: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.............................. Camp Pendelton............ North Area Waste Water $78,271,000
Conveyance...............
Camp Pendelton............ Infantry Squad Defense $29,187,000
Range....................
Twentynine Palms.......... Land Expansion............ $8,665,000
Florida................................. Jacksonville.............. P-8A Hangar Upgrades...... $6,085,000
Georgia................................. Kings Bay................. Crab Island Security $52,913,000
Enclave..................
Kings Bay................. WRA Land/Water Interface.. $33,150,000
Maryland................................ Patuxent River............ Aircraft Prototype $45,844,000
Facility Phase 2.........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2302 and available for military construction projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

[[Page H4609]]

Air Force: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska.......................................... Clear Air Force Base....................... $11,500,000
Arizona......................................... Luke Air Force Base........................ $26,800,000
Guam............................................ Joint Region Marianas...................... $13,400,000
Kansas.......................................... McConnell Air Force Base................... $34,400,000
Massachusetts................................... Hanscom Air Force Base..................... $13,500,000
Nevada.......................................... Nellis Air Force Base...................... $53,900,000
New Jersey...................................... Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst........... $5,900,000
Oklahoma........................................ Tinker Air Force Base...................... $111,000,000
Texas........................................... Joint Base San Antonio..................... $5,800,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2302 and available for military construction projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installation outside the United States, and in the amount,
set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United Kingdom................................. Croughton Royal Air Force Base................. $92,223,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2302. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning
after September 30, 2014, for military construction and land
acquisition functions of the Department of the Air Force, as
specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section
2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost
variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the
total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection
(a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

SEC. 2303. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2008 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110-181;
122 Stat. 515), for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, for
base infrastructure at that location, the Secretary of the
Air Force may acquire fee or lesser real property interests
in approximately 11.5 acres of land contiguous to Shaw Air
Force Base for the project using funds appropriated to the
Department of the Air Force for construction in years prior
to fiscal year 2015.

SEC. 2304. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECT.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444) and
extended by section 2307 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public
Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 994), shall remain in effect until
October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain................................. Shaikh Isa Air Base....... North Apron Expansion..... $45,000,000.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2305. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2012 PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Air Force: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska.................................. Eielson AFB............... Dormitory (168 RM)........ $45,000,000
Italy................................... Sigonella Naval Air UAS SATCOM Relay Pads and $15,000,000
Station.................. Facility.................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Subtitle A--Defense Agency Authorizations

SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for military construction projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona......................................... Fort Huachuca.............................. $1,871,000
California...................................... Camp Pendelton............................. $11,841,000
Coronado................................... $70, 340,000

[[Page H4610]]

Lemoore.................................... $52,500,000
Colorado........................................ Peterson Air Force Base.................... $15,200,000
Georgia......................................... Hunter Army Airfield....................... $7,692,000
Robins Air Force Base...................... $19,900,000
Hawaii.......................................... Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam............. $52,900,000
Kentucky........................................ Fort Campbell.............................. $18,000,000
Maryland........................................ Fort Meade................................. $54,207,000
Joint Base Andrews......................... $18,300,000
Michigan........................................ Selfridge Air National Guard Base.......... $35,100,000
Mississippi..................................... Stennis.................................... $27,547,000
Nevada.......................................... Fallon..................................... $20,241,000
New Mexico...................................... Cannon Air Force Base...................... $23,333,000
North Carolina.................................. Camp Lejeune............................... $52,748,000
Fort Bragg................................. $93,136,000
Seymour Johnson AFB........................ $8,500,000
South Carolina.................................. Beaufort................................... $40,600,000
South Dakota.................................... Ellsworth Air Force Base................... $8,000,000
Texas........................................... Joint Base San Antonio..................... $38,300,000
Virginia........................................ Craney Island.............................. $36,500,000
Defense Distribution Depot Richmond........ $5,700,000
Fort Belvoir............................... $7,239,000
Joint Base Langley-Eustis.................. $41,200,000
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story $39,588,000
Pentagon................................... $15,100,000
CONUS Classified................................ Classified Location........................ $53,073,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for military construction projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
installations or locations outside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Australia....................................... Geraldton.................................. $9,600,000
Belgium......................................... Brussels................................... $79,544,000
Guantanamo Bay.................................. Guantanamo Bay............................. $76,290,000
Japan........................................... Misawa Air Base............................ $37,775,000
Okinawa.................................... $170,901,000
Sasebo..................................... $37,681,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for energy conservation projects inside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy
conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United
States Code, for the installations or locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California..................................... Edwards Air Force Base...................... $4,500,000
Fort Hunter Liggett......................... $13,500,000
Vandenberg Air Force Base................... $7,197,000
Colorado....................................... Fort Carson................................. $3,000,000
Florida........................................ Eglin Air Force Base........................ $3,850,000
Georgia........................................ Moody Air Force Base........................ $3,600,000
Hawaii......................................... Marine Corps Base Hawaii.................... $8,460,000
Illinois....................................... Great Lakes Naval Station................... $2,190,000
Maine.......................................... Portsmouth Naval Shipyard................... $2,740,000
Maryland....................................... Fort Detrick................................ $2,100,000
North Dakota................................... Offutt Air Force Base....................... $2,869,000
Oklahoma....................................... Tinker Air Force Base....................... $3,609,000
Oregon......................................... Oregon City Armory.......................... $6,600,000
Utah........................................... Dugway Proving Ground....................... $15,400,000
Virginia....................................... Naval Station Norfolk....................... $11,360,000
Pentagon.................................... $2,120,000
Various Locations.............................. Various Locations........................... $23,679,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page H4611]]

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2403 and available for energy conservation projects outside
the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy
conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United
States Code, for the installations or locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:

Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Installation or Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diego Garcia................................... Naval Support Facility...................... $14,620,000
Japan.......................................... Fleet Activities Yokosuka................... $8,030,000
Germany........................................ Spangdahlem................................. $4,800,000
Various Locations.............................. Various Locations........................... $5,776,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Limitation on Set-aside of Facilities Restoration and
Modernization Program Funds for Energy Projects.--Amounts
appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriation
in section 301 for operation and maintenance and made
available for facilities restoration and modernization may
not be set-aside for the exclusive purpose of funding energy
projects on military installations. Installation energy
projects must compete in the normal process of determining
installation requirements.

SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning
after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the
Department of Defense (other than the military departments),
as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section
2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost
variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the
total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection
(a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

SEC. 2404. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2401 of that Act (124 Stat. 4446), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Defense Agencies: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
District of Columbia.................... Bolling Air Force Base.... Cooling Tower Expansion... $2,070,000
DIAC Parking Garage....... $13,586,000
Electrical Upgrades....... $1,080,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2405. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2012 PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the
authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2401 of that Act (125 Stat. 1672), shall
remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is as
follows:

Defense Agencies: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.............................. Coronado.................. SOF Support Activity $42,000,000
Operations Facility......
Germany................................. USAG Baumholder........... Wetzel-Smith Elementary $59,419,000
School...................
Italy................................... USAG Vicenza.............. Vicenza High School....... $41,864,000
Japan................................... Yokota Air Base........... Yokota High School........ $49,606,000
Virginia................................ Pentagon Reservation...... Heliport Control Tower and $6,457,000
Fire Station.............
Pedestrian Plaza.......... $2,285,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2406. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT
CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2015 PROJECTS PENDING
SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED REPORTS.

(a) Limitation.--No amounts may be obligated or expended
for the military construction projects described in
subsection (b) and otherwise authorized by section 2401(a)
until both of the reports described in subsection (c) have
been submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives.
(b) Covered Projects.--The limitation imposed by subsection
(a) applies to the following military construction projects:
(1) The construction of a human performance center facility
at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story, Virginia.
(2) The construction of a squadron operations facility at
Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico.
(c) Reports Described.--The reports referred to in
subsection (a) are--
(1) the report on the United States Special Operations
Command Preservation of the Force and Families initiative
requested under the heading ``U.S. Special Operations Command
Military Construction Requirements'' in the Joint Explanatory
Statement to Accompany the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014, as printed in the Congressional Record
on December 12, 2013 (page H7956); and
(2) the report on the review of Department of Defense
efforts regarding the prevention of suicide among members of
United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents
required by section 581 of this Act.

Subtitle B--Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations

SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL
DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning
after September 30, 2014, for military construction and land
acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in
the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section
2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost
variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under subsection (a) may not exceed the total
amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as
specified in the funding table in section 4601.

SEC. 2412. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROJECT.

(a) Modification.--The table in section 2401(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000
(division B of Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended
by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107-107;
115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public
Law 107-314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division
B of Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4450), is
amended--
(1) in the item relating to Blue Grass Army Depot,
Kentucky, by striking ``$746,000,000'' in the amount column
and inserting ``$780,000,000''; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the
amount column and inserting ``$1,237,920,000''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2405(b)(3) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000
(division B of Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 839), as amended
by

[[Page H4612]]

section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107-107; 115
Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public
Law 107-314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division
B of Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2011 (division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4450), is
further amended by striking ``$723,200,000'' and inserting
``$757,200,000''.

TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM

SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.

The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment
Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United
States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount
authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section
2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization as a result of construction previously financed
by the United States.

SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2014, for contributions
by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10,
United States Code, for the share of the United States of the
cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as
specified in the funding table in section 4601.

TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

Subtitle A--Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and
in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army National Guard: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delaware....................... Dagsboro.............. $10,800,000
Maine.......................... Augusta.............. $30,000,000
Maryland....................... Havre De Grace........ $12,400,000
Montana........................ Helena................ $38,000,000
New Mexico..................... Alamogordo............ $5,000,000
North Dakota................... Valley City........... $10,800,000
Vermont........................ North Hyde Park....... $4,400,000
Washington..................... Yakima................ $19,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California..................... Fresno................ $22,000,000
March Air Force Base.. $25,000,000
Colorado....................... Fort Carson........... $5,000,000
Illinois....................... Arlington Heights..... $26,000,000
Mississippi.................... Starkville............ $9,300,000
New Jersey..................... Joint Base McGuire-Dix- $26,000,000
Lakehurst.
New York....................... Mattydale............. $23,000,000
Virginia....................... Fort Lee.............. $16,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE
CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:

Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pennsylvania................. Pittsburgh............. $17,650,000
Washington................... Whidbey Island.......... $27,755,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND
LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air National Guard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connecticut.................................... Bradley International Airport................ $16,306,000

[[Page H4613]]

Iowa........................................... Des Moines Municipal Airport.................. $8,993,000
Michigan...................................... W.K. Kellog Regional Airport.................. $6,000,000
New Hampshire.................................. Pease International Trade Port................ $41,902,000
Pennsylvania................................... Willow Grove Air Reserve Field................ $5,662,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National
Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real
property and carry out military construction projects for the
Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in
the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air Force Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Location Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georgia...................... Robins Air Force Base... $27,700,000
North Carolina............... Seymour Johnson Air $9,800,000
Force Base.
Texas........................ Forth Worth............. $3,700,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD
AND RESERVE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2014, for the costs of
acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and
construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces,
and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title
10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of
land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.

Subtitle B--Other Matters

SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY
OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECTS.

(a) Modification.--
(1) Kansas city.--In the case of the authorization
contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division
B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1677), for Kansas City,
Kansas, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that
location, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new
facility in the vicinity of Kansas City, Kansas, instead of
constructing a new facility in Kansas City.
(2) Attleboro.--In the case of the authorization contained
in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1677), for Attleboro, Massachusetts,
for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location,
the Secretary of the Army may construct a new facility in the
vicinity of Attleboro, Massachusetts, instead of constructing
a new facility in Attleboro.
(b) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1660), the
authorizations set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in
effect until October 1, 2018, or the date of the enactment of
an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal
year 2019, whichever is later.

SEC. 2612. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN
FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT.

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in
section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239; 126
Stat. 2133) for Stormville, New York, for construction of a
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Phase I, the Secretary of
the Army may instead construct the facility at Camp Smith,
New York, and build a 53,760 square foot maintenance facility
in lieu of a 75,156 square foot maintenance facility.

SEC. 2613. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2011 PROJECT.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2002 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4436), the
authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as
provided in section 2601 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452) and
extended by section 2612 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public
Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1003), shall remain in effect until
October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act
authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.--The table referred to in subsection (a) is a
follows:

Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Installation or Location Project Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puerto Rico............................. Camp Santiago.............. Multipurpose Machine Gun $9,200,000
Range.....................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XXVII--BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

Subtitle A--Authorization of Appropriations

SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE
REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED
THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE
ACCOUNT.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 2014, for base
realignment and closure activities, including real property
acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized
by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part
A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)
and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure
Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended
by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-239;
126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in
section 4601.

Subtitle B--Prohibition on Additional BRAC Round

SEC. 2711. PROHIBITION ON CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL BASE
REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ROUND.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an
additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round.

Subtitle C--Other Matters

SEC. 2721. FORCE-STRUCTURE PLANS AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY
AND ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE NECESSARY TO
SUPPORT THE FORCE STRUCTURE.

(a) Preparation and Submission of Force-structure Plans and
Infrastructure Inventory.--As part of the budget
justification documents submitted to Congress in support of
the budget for the Department of Defense for fiscal year
2016, the Secretary of Defense shall include the following:
(1) Two force-structure plans for each of the Army, Navy,
Air Force, and Marine Corps for the 20-year period beginning
with fiscal year 2016, including the probable end-strength
levels and major military force units (including land force
divisions, carrier and other major combatant vessels, air
wings, and other comparable units) needed to meet anticipated
threats, and the anticipated levels of funding that will be
available for national defense purposes during such period.
One force-structure plan shall reflect the 2014 Quadrennial
Defense Review and the other force-structure plan shall
reflect the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act
of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.), as amended by title I of the
Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112-25) and section
101 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113-67).
(2) A comprehensive inventory of military installations
world-wide for each military department, with specifications
of the number and type of facilities in the active and
reserve forces of each military department.
(b) Relationship of Plans and Inventory.--Using the force-
structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall prepare (and
include as part of the submission of such plans and
inventory) the following:

[[Page H4614]]

(1) A description of the infrastructure necessary to
support the force structure described in each force-structure
plan.
(2) A discussion of categories of excess infrastructure and
infrastructure capacity, and the Secretary's targets for the
reduction of such excess capacity.
(3) An assessment of the excess infrastructure and the
value of retaining certain excess infrastructure to support
surge or reversibility requirements.
(4) An economic analysis of the effect of the closure or
realignment of military installations to reduce excess
infrastructure.
(c) Special Considerations.--In determining the level of
necessary versus excess infrastructure under subsection (b),
the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following:
(1) The anticipated continuing need for and availability of
military installations outside the United States, taking into
account current restrictions on the use of military
installations outside the United States and the potential for
future prohibitions or restrictions on the use of such
military installations.
(2) Any efficiencies that may be gained from joint tenancy
by more than one branch of the Armed Forces at a military
installation or the reorganization or association of two or
more military installations as a single military
installation.
(d) Certification of Need for Further Closures and
Realignments.--
(1) Certification required.--On the basis of the force-
structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under
subsection (a) and the descriptions and economic analysis
prepared under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall
include as part of the submission of the plans and inventory
a certification regarding whether the need exists for the
closure or realignment of additional military installations.
(2) Additional certification.--As a condition on the
certification under paragraph (1) that the need for an
additional round of closures and realignments exists, the
Secretary shall include an additional certification that
every recommendation for the closure or realignment of
military installations in the additional round of closures
and realignments will result in annual net savings for each
of the military departments within six years after the
initiation of the additional round of closures and
realignments.
(e) Comptroller General Evaluation.--
(1) Evaluation required.--If the certifications are
provided under subsection (d), the Comptroller General of the
United States shall prepare an evaluation of the following:
(A) The force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory
prepared under subsection (a), including an evaluation of the
accuracy and analytical sufficiency of the plans and
inventory.
(B) The need for the closure or realignment of additional
military installations.
(2) Submission.--The Comptroller General shall submit the
evaluation to Congress not later than 60 days after the date
on which the force-structure plans and infrastructure
inventory are submitted to Congress.

SEC. 2722. MODIFICATION OF PROPERTY DISPOSAL PROCEDURES UNDER
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE PROCESS.

(a) Report on Excess Property.--Section 2905 of the Defense
Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title
XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended
by inserting after subsection (e) the following new
subsection:
``(f) Report on Designation of Property as Excess Instead
of Surplus.--(1) Not later than 180 days after the date on
which real property located at a military installation closed
or realigned under this part is declared excess, but not
surplus, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report identifying the
property and including the information required by paragraph
(2). The Secretary shall update the report every 180 days
thereafter until the property is either declared surplus or
transferred to another Federal agency.
``(2) Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the
following elements:
``(A) The reason for the excess designation.
``(B) The nature of the contemplated transfer.
``(C) The proposed timeline for the transfer.
``(D) Any impediments to completing the Federal agency
screening process.''.
(b) Effect of Lack of Recognized Redevelopment Authority.--
Section 2910(9) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment
Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10
U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended--
(1) by striking ``The term'' and inserting ``(A) The
term''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
``(B) If no redevelopment authority referred to in
subparagraph (A) exists with respect to a military
installation, the term shall include the following:
``(i) The local government in whose jurisdiction the
military installation is wholly located.
``(ii) A local government agency or State government agency
designated by the chief executive officer of the State in
which the military installation is located under subparagraph
(B) of section 2905(b)(3) for the purpose of the consultation
required by subparagraph (A) of such section.''.

SEC. 2723. FINAL SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS REGARDING CARETAKER
AGREEMENT FOR FORMER DEFENSE DEPOT OGDEN, UTAH.

(a) Settlement of Claims.--Subject to the condition imposed
by subsection (b), any claim by the United States against the
City of Ogden, Utah, and the Ogden Local Redevelopment
Authority (as the recognized redevelopment authority for
former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah, which was closed pursuant
to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part
A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note))
related to the terms or execution of the Caretaker Agreement
originally signed and dated September 10, 1997, between the
Department of the Army and the City of Ogden and the Ogden
Local Redevelopment Authority is hereby declared to be
settled, the City of Ogden and the Ogden Local Redevelopment
Authority have no remaining financial obligation to the
United States arising from that agreement, and the Defense
Contract Management Agency shall cease any collection efforts
with respect to any such claim.
(b) Condition.--The operation of subsection (a) is
conditioned on release by the City of Ogden and the Ogden
Local Redevelopment Authority of any remaining financial
claim against the United States raising from the Caretaker
Agreement described in subsection (a).

TITLE XXVIII--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes

SEC. 2801. PREVENTION OF CIRCUMVENTION OF MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION LAWS.

Subsection (a) of section 2802 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended to read as follows:
``(a) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, the
Secretary concerned may carry out only such military
construction projects, land acquisitions, and defense access
road projects (as described under section 210 of title 23) as
are specifically authorized in a Military Construction
Authorization Act.''.

SEC. 2802. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT UNSPECIFIED
MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

(a) Unspecified Minor Military Construction Project
Described.--Subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of title 10,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) in the first sentence, by striking ``$2,000,000'' and
inserting ``$3,000,000''; and
(2) by striking the second sentence.
(b) Increased Threshold for Application of Secretory
Approval and Congressional Notification Requirements.--
Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended by striking
``$750,000'' and inserting ``$1,000,000''.
(c) Maximum Amount of Operation and Maintenance Funds
Authorized to Be Used for Projects.--Subsection (c) of such
section is amended by striking ``$750,000'' and inserting
``$1,000,000''.
(d) Annual Location Adjustment of Dollar Limitations.--Such
section is further amended by adding at the end the following
new subsection:
``(f) Adjustment of Dollar Limitations for Location.--Each
fiscal year, the Secretary concerned shall adjust the dollar
limitations specified in this section applicable to an
unspecified minor military construction project to reflect
the area construction cost index for military construction
projects published by the Department of Defense during the
prior fiscal year for the location of the project.''.

SEC. 2803. USE OF ONE-STEP TURN-KEY CONTRACTOR SELECTION
PROCEDURES FOR ADDITIONAL FACILITY PROJECTS.

Section 2862 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to
read as follows:

``Sec. 2862. Turn-key selection procedures

``(a) Authority to Use for Certain Purposes.--The Secretary
concerned may use one-step turn-key selection procedures for
the purpose of entering into a contract for any of the
following purposes:
``(1) The construction of an authorized military
construction project.
``(2) A repair project (as defined in section 2811(e) of
this title) with an approved cost equal to or less than
$4,000,000.
``(3) The construction of a facility as part of an
authorized security assistance activity.
``(b) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) The term `one-step turn-key selection procedures'
means procedures used for the selection of a contractor on
the basis of price and other evaluation criteria to perform,
in accordance with the provisions of a firm fixed-price
contract, both the design and construction of a facility
using performance specifications supplied by the Secretary
concerned.
``(2) The term `security assistance activity' means--
``(A) humanitarian and civic assistance authorized by
sections 401 and 2561 of this title;
``(B) foreign disaster assistance authorized by section 404
of this title;
``(C) foreign military construction sales authorized by
section 29 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2769);
``(D) foreign assistance authorized under sections 607 and
632 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2357,
2392); and
``(E) other international security assistance specifically
authorized by law.''.

SEC. 2804. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
IN EUROPEAN COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY.

Section 2809 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 127
Stat. 1013) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``or the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015'' after
``this division''; and
(2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``the date of the
enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``December 27, 2013''.

[[Page H4615]]

Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

SEC. 2811. CONSULTATION REQUIREMENT IN CONNECTION WITH
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MAJOR LAND ACQUISITIONS.

Section 2664(a) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``No military department'';
(2) by inserting after the first sentence the following new
paragraph:
``(2) If the real property acquisition is a major land
acquisition inside a State, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, or any territory or possession of the United
States, the Secretary concerned shall consult with the chief
executive officer of the State, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, or the territory or possession in which the
land is located to determine options for completing the real
property acquisition.'';
(3) by striking ``The foregoing limitation'' and inserting
the following:
``(3) The limitations imposed by paragraphs (1) and (2)'';
and
(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(4) In this subsection, the term `major land acquisition'
means any land acquisition not covered by the authority to
acquire low-cost interests in land under section 2663(c) of
this title.''.

SEC. 2812. RENEWALS, EXTENSIONS, AND SUCCEEDING LEASES FOR
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OPERATING ON MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS.

Section 2667(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(4)(A) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a renewal,
extension, or succeeding lease by the Secretary concerned
with a financial institution selected in accordance with the
Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation
providing for the selection of financial institutions to
operate on military installations if each of the following
applies:
``(i) The on-base financial institution was selected before
the date of the enactment of this paragraph or competitive
procedures are used for the selection of any new financial
institutions.
``(ii) A current and binding operating agreement is in
place between the installation commander and the selected on-
base financial institution.
``(B) The renewal, extension, or succeeding lease shall
terminate upon the termination of the operating agreement
described in subparagraph (A)(ii) associated with that
lease.''.

SEC. 2813. ARSENAL INSTALLATION REUTILIZATION AUTHORITY.

Section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsections (h), (i), and (j) as
subsections (i), (j), and (k), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new
subsection (h):
``(h) Arsenal Installation Reutilization Authority.--(1) In
the case of a military manufacturing arsenal, the Secretary
concerned shall delegate, subject to paragraph (2), the
authority provided by this section to the commander of the
military manufacturing arsenal or, if part of a larger
military installation, the installation commander for the
purpose of--
``(A) helping to maintain the viability of military
manufacturing arsenals and any installations on which they
are located;
``(B) eliminating, or at least reducing, the cost of
Government ownership of military manufacturing arsenals,
including the costs of operations and maintenance, the costs
of environmental remediation, and other costs; and
``(C) leveraging private investment at military
manufacturing arsenals through long-term facility use
contracts, property management contracts, leases, or other
agreements that support and advance the preceding purposes.
``(2) The authority delegated under paragraph (1) does not
include the authority to enter into a lease or contract under
this section to carry out any activity covered by section
4544(b) of this title related to sale of articles
manufactured by a military manufacturing arsenal or services
performed by a military manufacturing arsenal or the
performance of manufacturing work at the military
manufacturing arsenal.
``(3) Both leases and contracts are authorized under this
section for a military manufacturing arsenal, and,
notwithstanding subsection (b)(1), the term of the lease or
contract may be for up to 25 years if a lease or contract of
that duration will promote the national defense or be in the
public interest.
``(4) In this subsection, the term `military manufacturing
arsenal' means a Government-owned, Government-operated
defense plant of the Department of the Defense that
manufactures weapons, weapon components, or both.''.

SEC. 2814. DEPOSIT OF REIMBURSED FUNDS TO COVER
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES RELATING TO CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS.

(a) Authority to Credit Reimbursed Funds to Accounts
Currently Available.--Section 2695(c) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking the first sentence and inserting the
following: ``(1) Amounts collected by the Secretary of a
military department under subsection (a) for administrative
expenses shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary--
``(A) to the appropriation, fund, or account from which the
expenses were paid; or
``(B) to an appropriate appropriation, fund, or account
currently available to the Secretary for the purposes for
which the expenses were paid.''; and
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Amounts so
credited'' and inserting the following:
``(2) Amounts credited under paragraph (1)''.
(b) Prospective Applicability.--The amendments made by
subsection (a) shall not apply to administrative expenses
related to a real property transaction referred to in section
2695(b) of title 10, United States Code, that were covered by
the Secretary of a military department using amounts
appropriated to the Secretary before the date of the
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2815. SPECIAL EASEMENT ACQUISITION AUTHORITY, PACIFIC
MISSILE RANGE FACILITY, BARKING SANDS, KAUAI,
HAWAII.

(a) Easement Acquisition Authority.--The Secretary of the
Navy may use the authority provided by sections 2664 and
2684a of title 10, United States Code, to enter into
agreements with or acquire from willing sellers easements and
other interests in real property in the vicinity of the
Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii,
for the purpose of--
(1) limiting encroachments on military training, testing,
and operations at that installation; or
(2) facilitating such training, testing, and operations.
(b) Consideration.--As consideration for the acquisition of
an easement or other interest in real property under
subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy may not pay an
amount in excess of the fair market value of the interest to
be acquired.
(c) Conditions on Use of Authority.--
(1) No use of condemnation.--An easement or other interest
in real property may be acquired under subsection (a) only
from a willing seller.
(2) No acquisition of complete title.--Nothing in this
section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of the
Navy to use this section as authority to acquire all right,
title, and interest in and to real property in the vicinity
of the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands.
(d) Vicinity Defined.--In this section, the term
``vicinity'' means the area within 30 miles of the boundaries
of the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands.

SEC. 2816. NATIONAL SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS FOR INCLUSION OF
FEDERAL PROPERTY ON NATIONAL REGISTER OF
HISTORIC PLACES OR DESIGNATION AS NATIONAL
HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER THE NATIONAL HISTORIC
PRESERVATION ACT.

Section 101(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act
(16 U.S.C. 470a(a)) is amended as follows:
(1) In paragraph (2)--
(A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``; and'' and
inserting a semicolon;
(B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period and
inserting ``; and''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
``(G) notifying the Committee on Natural Resources of the
United States House of Representatives and the Committee on
Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate if the property is
owned by the Federal Government when the property is being
considered for inclusion on the National Register, for
designation as a National Historic Landmark, or for
nomination to the World Heritage List.''.
(2) By redesignating paragraphs (7) and (8) as paragraphs
(8) and (9), respectively.
(3) By inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
``(7) If the head of the agency managing any Federal
property objects to such inclusion or designation for reasons
of national security, such as any impact the inclusion or
designation would have on use of the property for military
training or readiness purposes, that Federal property shall
be neither included on the National Register nor designated
as a National Historic Landmark until the objection is
withdrawn.''.
(4) By adding after paragraph (9) (as so redesignated by
paragraph (2) of this section) the following:
``(10) The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to allow
for expedited removal of Federal property listed on the
National Register of Historic Places if the managing agency
of that Federal property submits to the Secretary a written
request to remove the Federal property from the National
Register of Historic Places for reasons of national security,
such as any impact the inclusion or designation would have on
use of the property for military training or readiness
purposes.''.

Subtitle C--Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment

SEC. 2831. REPEAL OR MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON
REALIGNMENT OF MARINE CORPS FORCES IN ASIA-
PACIFIC REGION.

Section 2822 of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 127
Stat. 1016) is amended--
(1) by striking subsections (a), (b), (c), and (e);
(2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (f) as subsections
(b) and (c), respectively; and
(3) by inserting before subsection (b), as redesignated,
the following new subsection (a):
``(a) Restriction on Development of Public
Infrastructure.--
``(1) Restriction.--If the Secretary of Defense determines
that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to
another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available in
fiscal year 2015 under Federal programs administered by
agencies other than the Department of Defense will result in
the development (including repair, replacement, renovation,
conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, or
construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the

[[Page H4616]]

Secretary of Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer,
cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless such
grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental
funding directly supports an infrastructure project agreed
upon in the March 2011 Programmatic Agreement signed by the
Department of Defense, the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation, the Guam State Historic Preservation Officer,
and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands State
Historic Preservation Officer Regarding the Military
Relocation to the Islands of Guam and Tinian.
``(2) Public infrastructure defined.--In this subsection,
term `public infrastructure' means any utility, method of
transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the
control of a public entity or State or local government that
is used by, or constructed for the benefit of, the general
public.''.

Subtitle D--Land Conveyances

SEC. 2841. LAND CONVEYANCE, MT. SOLEDAD VETERANS MEMORIAL, LA
JOLLA, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of Defense may
convey, without consideration, to the Mount Soledad Memorial
Association, Inc. (in this section referred to as the
``Association''), all right, title, and interest of the
United States in and to the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in
La Jolla, California, for the purpose of permitting the
Association to maintain the property for public purposes.
Upon conveyance of all right, title, and interest of the
United States in and to the property under this subsection,
the United States severs all involvement with the property
and, notwithstanding the condition imposed by subsection (c),
does not retain a reversionary interest for the enforcement
of such condition.
(b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of Defense shall
require the Association to cover costs (except costs for
environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by
the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs
incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under
subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for
environmental documentation, and any other administrative
costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected
from the Association in advance of the Secretary incurring
the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs
actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the
conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to
the Association.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such fund or account.
(c) Conditions on Conveyance.--The conveyance of the Mt.
Soledad Veterans Memorial under subsection (a) shall be
subject to the condition that a memorial shall be maintained
and used as a veterans memorial in perpetuity.
(d) Description of Property.--The legal description of the
Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial is provided in section 2(d) of
Public Law 109-272 (120 Stat. 771; 16 U.S.C. 431 note).
(e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of
Defense may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of
the United States.

SEC. 2842. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER WALTER REED ARMY HOSPITAL,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may
convey, without consideration, to Children's Hospital,
nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of the
District of Columbia with its principal place of business in
the District of Columbia (in this section referred to as the
``Children's Hospital''), all right, title, and interest of
the United States in and to a parcel of real property at
former Walter Reed Army Hospital in the District of Columbia
consisting of approximately 13.25 acres and including
building 54 (The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Building
and former Military Medical Museum), building 53 (former post
theater), building 52 (warehouse and outpatient clinic), and
building 3 (attached parking structure) for the purpose of
permitting Children's Hospital to use the parcel for public-
benefit purposes.
(b) Condition on Use of Revenues.--If the property conveyed
under subsection (a) is used for a public-benefit purpose
that results in the generation of revenue for Children's
Hospital, Children's Hospital shall agree to use the
generated revenue only for medical research purposes by
depositing the revenues in fund designated for medical
research use.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Army shall
require Children's Hospital to cover costs (except costs for
environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by
the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs
incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under
subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for
environmental documentation, and any other administrative
costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected
from Children's Hospital in advance of the Secretary
incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds
the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the
conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to
Children's Hospital.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such fund or account.
(d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection
(a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the
Secretary of the Army.
(e) Relation to Other Laws.--Section 2905(b) of the Defense
Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (title XXIX of
Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and section 2696 of
title 10, United States Code, shall not apply with respect to
the real property authorized for conveyance under subsection
(a).
(f) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary of the Army
determines at any time that the real property conveyed under
subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the
purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a) or that
Children's Hospital has violated the condition on the use of
revenues imposed by subsection (b), all right, title, and
interest in and to such real property, including any
improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary,
revert to and become the property of the United States, and
the United States shall have the right of immediate entry
onto such real property. A determination by the Secretary
under this subsection shall be made on the record after an
opportunity for a hearing.
(g) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the
Army may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

SEC. 2843. TRANSFERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, CAMP
FRANK D. MERRILL AND LAKE LANIER, GEORGIA.

(a) Transfers Required.--
(1) Camp frank d. merrill.--Not later than September 30,
2015, the Secretary of Agriculture shall transfer to the
administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army for
required Army force protection measures certain Federal land
administered as part of the Chattahoochee National Forest,
but permitted to the Secretary of the Army for Camp Frank D.
Merrill in Dahlonega, Georgia, consisting of approximately
282.304 acres identified in the permit numbered 0018-01.
(2) Lake lanier property.--In exchange for the land
transferred under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Army
(acting through the Chief of Engineers) shall transfer to the
administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture
certain Federal land administered by the Army Corps of
Engineers and consisting of approximately 10 acres adjacent
to Lake Lanier at 372 Dunlap Landing Road, Gainesville,
Georgia.
(b) Use of Transferred Land.--
(1) Camp frank d. merrill.--Upon receipt of the land under
subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of the Army shall continue
to use the land for military purposes.
(2) Lake lanier property.--Upon receipt of the land under
subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Agriculture shall use the
land for administrative purposes.
(c) Protection of the Etowah Darter and Holiday Darter.--
Nothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall
affect the prior designation of lands within the
Chattahoochee National Forest as critical habitat for the
Etowah darter (Etheostoma etowahae) and the Holiday darter
(Etheostoma brevirostrum).
(d) Legal Description and Map.--
(1) Preparation and publication.--The Secretary of the Army
and the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal
Register a legal description and map of both parcels of land
to be transferred under subsection (a).
(2) Force of law.--The legal description and map filed
under paragraph (1) for a parcel of land shall have the same
force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the
Secretaries may correct errors in the legal description and
map.
(e) Reimbursements of Costs.--The transfers required by
subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except
that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary
of Agriculture for any costs incurred by the Secretary of
Agriculture to assist in the preparation of the legal
description and maps required by subsection (d).

SEC. 2844. LAND CONVEYANCE, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM,
HAWAII.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may
convey, without consideration, to the Honolulu Authority for
Rapid Transportation (in this section referred to as the
``Honolulu Authority''), all right, title, and interest of
the United States in and to a parcel of real property,
including any improvements thereon, consisting of
approximately 1.2 acres at or in the nearby vicinity of
Radford Drive and the Makalapa Gate of Joint Base Pearl
Harbor-Hickam, for the purpose of permitting the Honolulu
Authority to use the property for public purposes.
(b) Condition on Use of Revenues.--If the property conveyed
under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such
subsection, for a public purpose that results in the
generation of revenue for the Honolulu Authority, the
Honolulu Authority shall agree to use the generated revenue
only for passenger rail transit purposes by depositing the
revenue in a fund designated for passenger rail transit use.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Navy shall
require the Honolulu Authority to cover costs to be incurred
by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such
costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance
under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for
environmental documentation, and any

[[Page H4617]]

other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If
amounts are collected from the Honolulu Authority in advance
of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount
collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the
Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall
refund the excess amount to the Honolulu Authority.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such fund or account.
(d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection
(a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the
Secretary of the Navy.
(e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the
Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of
the United States.

SEC. 2845. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS ON LAND CONVEYANCE,
JOLIET ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT, ILLINOIS.

Section 2922(c)(2) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (division B of Public
Law 104-106; 110 Stat. 605), as added by section 2842 of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000
(division B of Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 863) is amended
in the second sentence, by striking ``23 years of operation''
and inserting ``38 years of operation''.

SEC. 2846. LAND CONVEYANCE, ROBERT H. DIETZ ARMY RESERVE
CENTER, KINGSTON, NEW YORK.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may
convey, without consideration, to the City of Kingston, New
York (in this section referred to as the ``City''), all
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a
parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon,
consisting of approximately 4 acres and containing the Robert
H. Dietz Army Reserve Center located at 144 Flatbush Avenue
in Kingston, New York, for the purpose of permitting the City
to use the parcel for public purposes.
(b) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary of the Army
determines at any time that the real property conveyed under
subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the
purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a), all
right, title, and interest in and to such real property,
including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of
the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the
United States, and the United States shall have the right of
immediate entry onto such real property. A determination by
the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the
record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(c) Alternative Consideration Option.--
(1) Fair market value.--In lieu of exercising the
reversionary interest under subsection (b) if the Secretary
of the Army determines that the conveyed property is not
being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance,
the Secretary may require the City to pay to the United
States an amount equal to the fair market value of the
property, as determined pursuant to paragraph (2).
(2) Appraisal; adjustment.--The Secretary shall determine
the fair market value of the property through an appraisal
conducted by a licensed, independent appraiser acceptable to
the Secretary and the City. The fair market value of the
property shall be adjusted to exclude the value of any
improvements on the property constructed by the City.
(d) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Army shall
require the City to cover costs (except costs for
environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by
the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs
incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under
subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for
environmental documentation, and any other administrative
costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected
from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring the
actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs
actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the
conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to
the City.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such fund or account.
(e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the
Army may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of
the United States.

SEC. 2847. EXERCISE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST, CAMP GRUBER,
OKLAHOMA.

(a) Business Case Analysis.--Not later than March 31, 2015,
the Secretary of the Army shall perform a business case
analysis to consider the merits of seeking, for use as
military maneuver space, the reversion of former Camp Gruber,
Oklahoma, which--
(1) consists of approximately 31,283.66 acres; and
(2) was conveyed to the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife in
1948 subject to a reversionary clause that gives the United
States the right to reacquire the land if needed for national
defense purposes.
(b) Exercise of Reversionary Right.--If, as a result of the
business case analysis required by subsection (a), the
Secretary of the Army determines that reacquisition of former
Camp Gruber is needed for national defense purposes, the
Secretary shall exercise the reversionary right and request
the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife to reconvey Camp Gruber
to the United States.
(c) Conveyance to Oklahoma Military Department.--If Camp
Gruber is reacquired by the United States under subsection
(b), the Secretary of the Army shall convey, without
consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United
States in and to Camp Gruber to the Oklahoma Military
Department for the purpose of permitting the Oklahoma
Military Department to use Camp Gruber as military maneuver
space.
(d) Consultation Requirement.--The Secretary of the Army
shall conduct the business case analysis required by
subsection (a) and make the determination under subsection
(b) in consultation with the Adjutant General of the Oklahoma
Military Department.
(e) Structures and Improvements.--The reacquisition of Camp
Gruber under this section shall include the improvements,
structures, and fixtures located at Camp Gruber and related
personal property.
(f) Costs.--
(1) Costs of exercising reversion.--The Secretary of the
Army shall be responsible for all reasonable and necessary
costs associated with exercising the reversionary interest
under subsection (b) and reacquiring Camp Gruber, including
real estate transaction and environmental documentation
costs.
(2) Costs of subsequent conveyance.--
(A) Payment required.--The Secretary of the Army shall
require the Oklahoma Military Department to cover costs to be
incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for
such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the
conveyance under subsection (c), including survey costs,
costs for environmental documentation, and any other
administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts
are collected from the Oklahoma Military Department in
advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the
amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the
Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall
refund the excess amount to the Oklahoma Military Department.
(B) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under subparagraph (A) shall be credited to the
fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred
by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so
credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or
account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in
such fund or account.
(g) Prohibition on Use of Operation and Maintenance
Funds.--Notwithstanding subsection (f), the Secretary of the
Army may not use amounts appropriated for operation and
maintenance for the Army for the purpose of establishing,
reactivating, modernizing, or sustaining any portion of Camp
Gruber reacquired by the United States under subsection (b).
(h) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of the
Army may require such additional terms and conditions in
connection with the conveyance under subsection (c) as the
Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of
the United States.

SEC. 2848. LAND CONVEYANCE, HANFORD SITE, WASHINGTON.

(a) Conveyance Required.--
(1) In general.--Not later than December 31, 2014, the
Secretary of Energy shall convey to the Community Reuse
Organization of the Hanford Site (in this section referred to
as the ``Organization'') all right, title, and interest of
the United States in and to two parcels of real property,
including any improvements thereon, consisting of
approximately 1,341 acres and 300 acres, respectively, of the
Hanford Reservation, as requested by the Organization on May
31, 2011, and October 13, 2011, and as depicted within the
proposed boundaries on the map titled ``Attachment 2-Revised
Map'' included in the October 13, 2011, letter.
(2) Modification of conveyance.--Upon the agreement of the
Secretary and the Organization, the Secretary may adjust the
boundaries of one or both of the parcels specified for
conveyance under paragraph (1).
(b) Consideration.--As consideration for the conveyance
under subsection (a), the Organization shall pay to the
United States an amount equal to the estimated fair market
value of the conveyed real property, as determined by the
Secretary of Energy, except that the Secretary may convey the
property without consideration or for consideration below the
estimated fair market value of the property if the
Organization--
(1) agrees that the net proceeds from any sale or lease of
the property (or any portion thereof) received by the
Organization during at least the seven-year period beginning
on the date of such conveyance will be used to support the
economic redevelopment of, or related to, the Hanford Site;
and
(2) executes the agreement for such conveyance and accepts
control of the real property within a reasonable time.
(c) Expedited Notification to Congress.--Except as provided
in subsection (d)(2), the enactment of this section shall be
construed to satisfy any notice to Congress otherwise
required for the land conveyance required by this section.
(d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Energy may require such
additional terms and conditions in

[[Page H4618]]

connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the
Secretary deems necessary to protect the interests of the
United States.
(2) Congressional notification.--If the Secretary uses the
authority provided by paragraph (1) to impose a term or
condition on the conveyance, the Secretary shall submit to
Congress written notice of the term or condition and the
reason for imposing the term or condition.

Subtitle E--Other Matters

SEC. 2861. MEMORIAL TO THE VICTIMS OF THE SHOOTING ATTACK AT
THE WASHINGTON NAVY YARD.

(a) Memorial Authorized.--The Secretary of the Navy may
establish on the grounds of the Washington Navy Yard in the
District of Columbia a memorial dedicated to the victims of
the shooting attack at the Washington Navy Yard that occurred
on September 16, 2013.
(b) Establishment, Maintenance, and Repair.--The Secretary
of the Navy shall be responsible for the establishment,
maintenance, and repair of the memorial.
(c) Acceptance of Contributions; Use.--
(1) Acceptance of contributions.--The Secretary of the Navy
may solicit and accept monetary contributions and gifts of
property for the purpose of establishing, maintaining, and
repairing the memorial without regard to limitations
contained in section 2601 of title 10, United States Code.
(2) Establishment of account.--There is established on the
books of the Treasury an account for the deposit of monetary
contributions received pursuant to paragraph (1).
(3) Deposit and availability of contributions.--The
Secretary of the Navy shall deposit monetary contributions
accepted under paragraph (1) in the account. The funds in the
account shall be available to the Secretary, until expended
and without further appropriation, but only for the
establishment, maintenance, and repair of the memorial.

SEC. 2862. REDESIGNATION OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR
SECURITY STUDIES AS THE DANIEL K. INOUYE ASIA-
PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECURITY STUDIES.

(a) Redesignation.--The Department of Defense regional
center for security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center
for Security Studies is hereby renamed the ``Daniel K. Inouye
Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Reference to regional centers for strategic studies.--
Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by striking ``Asia-Pacific Center for Security
Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific
Center for Security Studies''.
(2) Acceptance of gifts and donations.--Section
2611(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking ``Asia-
Pacific Center for Security Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel
K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
(c) References.--Any reference to the Department of Defense
Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any law,
regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the
United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel
K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.

SEC. 2863. REDESIGNATION OF POHAKULOA TRAINING AREA IN HAWAII
AS POHAKULOA TRAINING CENTER.

(a) Redesignation.--The Pohakuloa Training Area in the
State of Hawaii is hereby renamed the ``Pohakuloa Training
Center''.
(b) References.--Any reference to the Pohakuloa Training
Area in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other
paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference
to the Pohakuloa Training Center.

SEC. 2864. DESIGNATION OF DISTINGUISHED FLYING CROSS NATIONAL
MEMORIAL IN RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The most reliable statistics regarding the number of
members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the
Distinguished Flying Cross indicate that 126,318 members of
the Armed Forces received the medal during World War II,
approximately 21,000 members received the medal during the
Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received the medal during
the Vietnam War. Since the end of the Vietnam War, more than
203 Armed Forces members have received the medal in times of
conflict.
(2) The National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis,
Missouri, burned down in 1973, and thus many more recipients
of the Distinguished Flying Cross may be undocumented.
Currently, the Department of Defense continues to locate and
identify members of the Armed Forces who have received the
medal and are undocumented.
(3) The United States currently lacks a national memorial
dedicated to the bravery and sacrifice of those members of
the Armed Forces who have distinguished themselves by heroic
deeds performed in aerial flight.
(4) An appropriate memorial to current and former members
of the Armed Forces is under construction at March Field Air
Museum in Riverside, California.
(5) This memorial will honor all those members of the Armed
Forces who have distinguished themselves in aerial flight,
whether documentation of such members who earned the
Distinguished Flying Cross exists or not.
(b) Designation.--The memorial to members of the Armed
Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross,
located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California,
is hereby designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross
National Memorial.
(c) Effect of Designation.--The national memorial
designated by this section is not a unit of the National Park
System, and the designation of the national memorial shall
not be construed to require or permit Federal funds to be
expended for any purpose related to the national memorial.

SEC. 2865. RENAMING SITE OF THE DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE
NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK, OHIO.

Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage
Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended
by striking ``Aviation Center'' and inserting ``National
Museum''.

SEC. 2866. MANHATTAN PROJECT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

(a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are--
(1) to preserve and protect for the benefit of present and
future generations the nationally significant historic
resources associated with the Manhattan Project and which are
under the jurisdiction of the Department of Energy defense
environmental cleanup program under this title;
(2) to improve public understanding of the Manhattan
Project and the legacy of the Manhattan Project through
interpretation of the historic resources associated with the
Manhattan Project;
(3) to enhance public access to the Historical Park
consistent with protection of public safety, national
security, and other aspects of the mission of the Department
of Energy; and
(4) to assist the Department of Energy, Historical Park
communities, historical societies, and other interested
organizations and individuals in efforts to preserve and
protect the historically significant resources associated
with the Manhattan Project.
(b) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Historical park.--The term ``Historical Park'' means
the Manhattan Project National Historical Park established
under subsection (c).
(2) Manhattan project.--The term ``Manhattan Project''
means the Federal military program to develop an atomic bomb
ending on December 31, 1946.
(3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary
of the Interior.
(c) Establishment of Manhattan Project National Historical
Park.--
(1) Establishment.--
(A) Date.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this section, there shall be established as a
unit of the National Park System the Manhattan Project
National Historical Park.
(B) Areas included.--The Historical Park shall consist of
facilities and areas listed under paragraph (2) as determined
by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of
Energy. The Secretary shall include the area referred to in
paragraph (2)(C)(i), the B Reactor National Historic
Landmark, in the Historical Park.
(2) Eligible areas.--The Historical Park may only be
comprised of one or more of the following areas, or portions
of the areas, as generally depicted in the map titled
``Manhattan Project National Historical Park Sites'',
numbered 540/108,834-C, and dated September 2012:
(A) Oak ridge, tennessee.--Facilities, land, or interests
in land that are--
(i) at Buildings 9204-3 and 9731 at the Department of
Energy Y-12 National Security Complex;
(ii) at the X-10 Graphite Reactor at the Department of
Energy Oak Ridge National Laboratory;
(iii) at the K-25 Building site at the Department of Energy
East Tennessee Technology Park; and
(iv) at the former Guest House located at 210 East Madison
Road.
(B) Los alamos, new mexico.--Facilities, land, or interests
in land that are--
(i) in the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory National
Historic Landmark District, or any addition to the Landmark
District proposed in the National Historic Landmark
Nomination--Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) NHL
District (Working Draft of NHL Revision), Los Alamos National
Laboratory document LA-UR 12-00387 (January 26, 2012);
(ii) at the former East Cafeteria located at 1670 Nectar
Street; and
(iii) at the former dormitory located at 1725 17th Street.
(C) Hanford, washington.--Facilities, land, or interests in
land on the Department of Energy Hanford Nuclear Reservation
that are--
(i) the B Reactor National Historic Landmark;
(ii) the Hanford High School in the town of Hanford and
Hanford Construction Camp Historic District;
(iii) the White Bluffs Bank building in the White Bluffs
Historic District;
(iv) the warehouse at the Bruggemann's Agricultural
Complex;
(v) the Hanford Irrigation District Pump House; and
(vi) the T Plant (221-T Process Building).
(3) Written consent of owner.--No non-Federal property may
be included in the Historical Park without the written
consent of the owner.
(d) Agreement.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this section, the Secretary and the Secretary of
Energy (acting through the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, and
Richland site offices) shall enter into an agreement
governing the respective roles of the Secretary and the
Secretary of Energy in administering the facilities, land, or
interests in land under the administrative jurisdiction of
the Department of Energy that is to be included in the
Historical Park under subsection (c)(2), including provisions
for enhanced public access, management, interpretation, and
historic preservation.
(2) Responsibilities of the secretary.--Any agreement under
paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary shall--
(A) have decisionmaking authority for the content of
historic interpretation of the Manhattan Project for purposes
of administering the Historical Park; and
(B) ensure that the agreement provides an appropriate
advisory role for the National Park Service in preserving the
historic resources covered by the agreement.
(3) Responsibilities of the secretary of energy.--Any
agreement under paragraph (1) shall provide that the
Secretary of Energy--

[[Page H4619]]

(A) shall ensure that the agreement appropriately protects
public safety, national security, and other aspects of the
ongoing mission of the Department of Energy at the Oak Ridge
Reservation, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Hanford
Site;
(B) may consult with and provide historical information to
the Secretary concerning the Manhattan Project;
(C) shall retain responsibility, in accordance with
applicable law, for any environmental remediation that may be
necessary in or around the facilities, land, or interests in
land governed by the agreement; and
(D) shall retain authority and legal obligations for
historic preservation and general maintenance, including to
ensure safe access, in connection with the Department's
Manhattan Project resources.
(4) Amendments.--The agreement under paragraph (1) may be
amended, including to add to the Historical Park facilities,
land, or interests in land within the eligible areas
described in subsection (c)(2) that are under the
jurisdiction of the Secretary of Energy.
(e) Public Participation.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall consult with
interested State, county, and local officials, organizations,
and interested members of the public--
(A) before executing any agreement under subsection (d);
and
(B) in the development of the general management plan under
subsection (f)(2).
(2) Notice of determination.--Not later than 30 days after
the date on which an agreement under subsection (d) is
entered into, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal
Register notice of the establishment of the Historical Park,
including an official boundary map.
(3) Availability of map.--The official boundary map
published under paragraph (2) shall be on file and available
for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the
National Park Service. The map shall be updated to reflect
any additions to the Historical Park from eligible areas
described in subsection (c)(2).
(4) Additions.--Any land, interest in land, or facility
within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) that
is acquired by the Secretary or included in an amendment to
the agreement under subsection (d)(4) shall be added to the
Historical Park.
(f) Administration.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall administer the
Historical Park in accordance with--
(A) this section; and
(B) the laws generally applicable to units of the National
Park System, including--
(i) the National Park System Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et
seq.); and
(ii) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
(2) General management plan.--Not later than 3 years after
the date on which funds are made available to carry out this
subsection, the Secretary, with the concurrence of the
Secretary of Energy, and in consultation and collaboration
with the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos and Richland Department of
Energy site offices, shall complete a general management plan
for the Historical Park in accordance with section 12(b) of
Public Law 91-383 (commonly known as the National Park
Service General Authorities Act; 16 U.S.C. 1a-7(b)).
(3) Interpretive tours.--The Secretary may, subject to
applicable law, provide interpretive tours of historically
significant Manhattan Project sites and resources in the
States of Tennessee, New Mexico, and Washington that are
located outside the boundary of the Historical Park.
(4) Land acquisition.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary may acquire land and
interests in land within the eligible areas described in
subsection (c)(2) by--
(i) transfer of administrative jurisdiction from the
Department of Energy by agreement between the Secretary and
the Secretary of Energy;
(ii) donation; or
(iii) exchange.
(B) No use of condemnation.--The Secretary may not acquire
by condemnation any land or interest in land under this
section or for the purposes of this section.
(5) Donations; cooperative agreements.--
(A) Federal facilities.--
(i) In general.--The Secretary may enter into one or more
agreements with the head of a Federal agency to provide
public access to, and management, interpretation, and
historic preservation of, historically significant Manhattan
Project resources under the jurisdiction or control of the
Federal agency.
(ii) Donations; cooperative agreements.--The Secretary may
accept donations from, and enter into cooperative agreements
with, State governments, units of local government, tribal
governments, organizations, or individuals to further the
purpose of an interagency agreement entered into under clause
(i) or to provide visitor services and administrative
facilities within reasonable proximity to the Historical
Park.
(B) Technical assistance.--The Secretary may provide
technical assistance to State, local, or tribal governments,
organizations, or individuals for the management,
interpretation, and historic preservation of historically
significant Manhattan Project resources not included within
the Historical Park.
(C) Donations to department of energy.--For the purposes of
this section, or for the purpose of preserving and providing
access to historically significant Manhattan Project
resources, the Secretary of Energy may accept, hold,
administer, and use gifts, bequests, and devises (including
labor and services).
(g) Clarification.--
(1) No buffer zone created.--Nothing in this section, the
establishment of the Historical Park, or the management plan
for the Historical Park shall be construed to create buffer
zones outside of the Historical Park. That an activity can be
seen and heard from within the Historical Park shall not
preclude the conduct of that activity or use outside the
Historical Park.
(2) No cause of action.--Nothing in this section shall
constitute a cause of action with respect to activities
outside or adjacent to the established boundary of the
Historical Park.

TITLE XXIX--MILITARY LAND TRANSFERS AND WITHDRAWALS TO SUPPORT
READINESS AND SECURITY

Subtitle A--Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada

SEC. 2901. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION, NAVAL AIR
STATION FALLON, NEVADA.

(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall
transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without consideration,
the Federal land described in subsection (b).
(b) Description of Federal Land.--The Federal land referred
to in subsection (a) is the parcel of approximately 400 acres
of land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the
Interior that--
(1) is adjacent to Naval Air Station Fallon in Churchill
County, Nevada; and
(2) was withdrawn under Public Land Order 6834 (NV-943-
4214-10; N-37875).
(c) Management.--On transfer of the Federal land described
under subsection (b) to the Secretary of the Navy, the
Secretary of the Navy shall have full jurisdiction, custody,
and control of the Federal land.

SEC. 2902. WATER RIGHTS.

(a) Water Rights.--Nothing in this subtitle shall be
construed--
(1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United
States with respect to any water or water right on lands
transferred by this subtitle; or
(2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands
transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with
applicable State law.
(b) Effect on Previously Acquired or Reserved Water
Rights.--This section shall not be construed to affect any
water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before
the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2903. WITHDRAWAL.

Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land to be
transferred under section 2901 is withdrawn from all forms of
appropriation under the public land laws, including the
mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal
leasing laws, so long as the land remains under the
administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy.

Subtitle B--Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms,
California

SEC. 2911. REDESIGNATION OF JOHNSON VALLEY OFF-HIGHWAY
VEHICLE RECREATION AREA, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Redesignation.--The Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle
Recreation Area in California is hereby redesignated as the
``Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation
Area''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--Subtitle C of title XXIX of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(division B of Public Law 113-66) is amended--
(1) in section 2942(c)(3) (127 Stat. 1037), by striking
``Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area''and
inserting ``Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle
Recreation Area''; and
(2) in section 2945 (127 Stat. 1038)--
(A) in the section heading, by inserting ``NATIONAL'' after
``VALLEY'';
(B) in subsection (a), by inserting ``National'' after
``Valley'' in the matter preceding paragraph (1); and
(C) in subsections (b), (c), and (d), by inserting
``National'' after ``Valley'' each place it appears.
(c) Relation to Authorized Navy Use.--The redesignation of
the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area as the
Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area
does not alter or interfere with the rights and obligations
of the Navy regarding the use of portions of the Recreation
Area as provided in subtitle C of title XXIX of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division
B of Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1034).
(d) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation,
document, record, map, or other paper of the United States to
the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area is
deemed to be a reference to the Johnson Valley National Off-
Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.

Subtitle C--Bureau of Land Management Withdrawn Military Lands
Efficiency and Savings

SEC. 2921. ELIMINATION OF TERMINATION DATE FOR PUBLIC LAND
WITHDRAWALS AND RESERVATIONS UNDER MILITARY
LANDS WITHDRAWAL ACT OF 1999.

(a) Elimination of Termination Date.--Section 3015(a) of
the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of
Public Law 106-65; 113 Stat. 892) is amended by striking
``shall'' the first place it appears and all that follows
through the period and inserting ``shall not terminate other
than by an election and determination of the Secretary of the
military department concerned or until such time as the
Secretary of the Interior can permanently transfer
administrative jurisdiction of the lands withdrawn and
reserved by this Act to the Secretary of the military
department concerned.''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3016 of the Military
Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106-65;
113 Stat. 893) is repealed.

[[Page H4620]]

Subtitle D--Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California

SEC. 2931. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND FOR
NAVAL AIR WEAPONS STATION CHINA LAKE,
CALIFORNIA.

(a) Permanent Withdrawal and Reservation.--Section 2979 of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1047) is
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 2979. PERMANENT WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION.

``The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by
section 2971 shall not terminate, except pursuant to--
``(1) an election and determination by the Secretary of the
Navy to relinquish the land under section 2922; or
``(2) a transfer by the Secretary of the Interior of
permanent administrative jurisdiction over the land to the
Secretary of the Navy.''.
(b) Withdrawal and Reservation of Additional Public Land.--
Section 2971(b) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 1044) is amended--
(1) by striking ``The public land'' and inserting the
following:
``(1) Initial withdrawal.--The public land''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) Additional withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing
rights, the public land (including interests in land)
referred to in subsection (a) also includes the approximately
26,313 acres of public land in San Bernardino County,
California, identified as `Proposed Navy Acquisition Area'
(but excluding the parcel identified as `AF Fee Simple') on
the map entitled `Cuddeback Land Area' and dated April 1,
2014, and filed in accordance with section 2912, except that
the withdrawal area specifically excludes any public land
included within the Grass Valley Wilderness and all private
lands otherwise located within the boundaries of the
withdrawal area. The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that
the owners of the excluded private land continue to have
reasonable access to their private land.''.
(c) Management of Additional Public Land.--Section 2973 of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1045) is
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(c) Additional Management Considerations for Certain
Lands.--Subject to existing laws and to the extent possible
without compromising mission readiness, the Secretary of the
Navy shall manage the additional lands withdrawn by section
2971(b)(2) to protect existing historic, economic, cultural,
recreational, hunting, and scientific features and uses,
including access to existing roadways and trails.''.

Subtitle E--White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico

SEC. 2941. ADDITIONAL WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC
LAND TO SUPPORT WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW
MEXICO.

Section 2951(b) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113-66;
127 Stat. 1039) is amended--
(1) by striking ``The Federal land'' and inserting the
following:
``(1) Initial withdrawal.--The Federal land''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) Northern extension area.--The Federal land referred
to in subsection (a) also includes the Federal land under the
jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management located beneath
the boundaries of the Special Use Airspace Areas designated
as R-5107C and R-5107H for White Sands Missile Range, New
Mexico, as described in Federal Aviation Administration Order
JO 7400.8W dated February 16, 2014.''.

DIVISION C--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND
OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE XXXI--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

Subtitle A--National Security Programs Authorizations

SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for
fiscal year 2015 for the activities of the National Nuclear
Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified
in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of New Plant Projects.--From funds
referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying
out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new
plant projects for the National Nuclear Security
Administration as follows:
Project 15-D-613, Emergency Operations Center, Y-12
National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, $2,000,000.
Project 15-D-612, Emergency Operations Center, Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, California, $2,000,000.
Project 15-D-611, Emergency Operations Center, Sandia
National Laboratories, New Mexico, $4,000,000.
Project 15-D-302, TA-55 Reinvestment Project Phase III, Los
Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico,
$16,062,000.
Project 15-D-301, High Explosive Science and Engineering
Facility, Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas, $11,800,000.
Project 15-D-904, NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3, Naval
Reactors Facility, Idaho, $400,000.
Project 15-D-903, KL Fire System Upgrade, Knolls Atomic
Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York, $600,000.
Project 15-D-902, KS Engineroom Team Trainer Facility,
Kesselring Site, West Milton, New York, $1,500,000.
Project 15-D-901, KS Central Office and Prototype Staff
Building, Kesselring Site, West Milton, New York,
$24,000,000.

SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for
fiscal year 2015 for defense environmental cleanup activities
in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in
section 4701.
(b) Authorization of New Plant Projects.--From funds
referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying
out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out,
for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following
new plant projects:
Project 15-D-401, KW Basin Sludge Removal Project, Hanford,
Washington, $26,290,000.
Project 15-D-402, Saltstone Disposal Unit #6, Savannah
River Site, Aiken, South Carolina, $34,642,000.
Project 15-D-405, Sludge Processing Facility Build Out, Oak
Ridge, Tennessee, $4,200,000.
Project 15-D-406, Hexavalent Chromium Pump and Treatment
Remedy Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
New Mexico, $28,600,000.
Project 15-D-409, Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System,
Hanford, Washington, $23,000,000.

SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for other defense
activities in carrying out programs as specified in the
funding table in section 4701.

SEC. 3104. ENERGY SECURITY AND ASSURANCE.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the
Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for energy security
and assurance programs necessary for national security as
specified in the funding table in section 4701.

Subtitle B--Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations

SEC. 3111. DESIGN AND USE OF PROTOTYPES OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS
FOR INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES.

(a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 4509 of the
Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2660) is amended to read
as follows:
``(a) Prototypes.--(1) Not later than the date on which the
President submits to Congress under section 1105 of title 31,
United States Code, the budget for fiscal year 2016, the
directors of the national security laboratories shall jointly
develop a multiyear plan to design and build prototypes of
nuclear weapons to further intelligence estimates with
respect to foreign nuclear weapons activities and
capabilities.
``(2) Not later than the date on which the President
submits to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United
States Code, the budget for an even-numbered fiscal year
occurring after fiscal year 2017, the directors shall jointly
develop an update to the plan developed under paragraph (1).
``(3)(A) The directors shall jointly submit to the
Secretary of Energy the plan and each update developed under
paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively.
``(B) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the
directors submit the plan and each update under subparagraph
(A), the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the
congressional defense committees such plan and each such
update, without change.
``(4)(A) The Secretary, in coordination with the directors
of the nuclear weapons laboratories, shall carry out the plan
developed under paragraph (1), including the updates to the
plan developed under paragraph (2).
``(B) The Secretary may determine the manner in which the
designing and building of prototypes of nuclear weapons is
carried out under such plan.
``(C) The Secretary shall promptly submit to the
congressional defense committees written notification of any
changes the Secretary makes to such plan pursuant to
subparagraph (B), including justifications for such
changes.''.
(b) Matters Included.--Such section is further amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new
subsection:
``(b) Matters Included.--(1) The directors shall ensure
that the plan developed and updated under subsection (a)
provides increased information upon which to base
intelligence assessments and emphasizes the competencies of
the national security laboratories with respect to designing
and building prototypes of nuclear weapons.
``(2) To carry out paragraph (1), the plan developed and
updated under subsection (a) shall include the following:
``(A) Design and system engineering activities of full-
scale engineering prototypes (using surrogate special nuclear
materials), including weaponization features as required.
``(B) Design, system engineering, and experimental testing
(using surrogate special nuclear materials) of above-ground
experiment test hardware.
``(C) Design and system engineering of scaled or
subcomponent experimental test articles (using special
nuclear materials) for conducting experiments at the Nevada
National Security Site.''.
(c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (c) of such section,
as redesignated by subsection (b), is amended by striking
``subsection (a), the Administrator'' and inserting ``this
section, the Secretary''.

[[Page H4621]]

SEC. 3112. AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL LEVELS OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

(a) Full-time Equivalent Personnel Levels.--Subsection (a)
of section 3241A of the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441a) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)--
(A) by striking ``2014'' and inserting ``2015''; and
(B) by striking ``1,825'' and inserting ``1,650''; and
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2016''; and
(B) by striking ``1,825'' and inserting ``1,650''.
(b) Definition.--Such section is further amended by adding
at the end the following new subsection:
``(e) Office of the Administrator Employees.--In this
section, the term `Office of the Administrator', with respect
to the employees of the Administration, includes employees
whose funding is derived from an account of the
Administration titled `Federal Salaries and Expenses'.''.

SEC. 3113. COST CONTAINMENT FOR URANIUM CAPABILITIES
REPLACEMENT PROJECT.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the April 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, a February 2011
letter from the President to the Senate, and many other
policy statements and documents have identified the Uranium
Capabilities Replacement Project as a critical nuclear
modernization priority;
(2) the failure of the Department of Energy and the
National Nuclear Security Administration to successfully and
efficiently execute and oversee the Uranium Capabilities
Replacement Project undermines national security and
jeopardizes the long-term credibility of the nuclear
deterrent;
(3) the April 8, 2014, testimony of the Acting
Administrator for Nuclear Security that ``close to half'' of
the $1,200,000,000 taxpayers have spent on the design of such
project has been wasted is a grievous misuse of limited
taxpayer funds, and the appropriate officials of the Federal
Government and contractors must be held accountable;
(4) the uranium capabilities and modern infrastructure that
are to be provided by all three phases of the Uranium
Capabilities Replacement Project are critical to national
security and Congress fully supports efforts to deliver all
of these capabilities efficiently and expeditiously;
(5) focused attention and robust leadership from the
highest levels of the executive branch and Congress are
required to ensure that such project delivers such critical
national security capabilities; and
(6) the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator for
Nuclear Security must ensure that lines of responsibility,
authority, and accountability for such project are clear
going forward.
(b) Cost and Oversight of Project.--Section 3123 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2178), as amended by section
3126 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2014 (Public Law 113-66; 127 Stat. 1063), is amended--
(1) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows:
``(d) Cost of Phase I.--
``(1) Limitation.--The total cost of Phase I under
subsection (a) of the project referred to in such subsection
may not exceed $4,200,000,000.
``(2) Adjustment.--If the Secretary determines the total
cost of Phase I will exceed the amount set forth in paragraph
(1), the Secretary may adjust such amount if, by not later
than March 1, 2015, the Secretary submits to the
congressional defense committees a detailed justification for
such adjustment, including--
``(A) the amount of the adjustment and the proposed total
cost of Phase I;
``(B) a detailed justification for such adjustment,
including a description of the changes that would be required
to the project referred to in subsection (a) if Phase I were
to not exceed the total cost set forth in paragraph (1);
``(C) a detailed description of the actions taken to hold
appropriate contractors, employees of contractors, and
employees of the Federal Government accountable for the
repeated failures within the project;
``(D) a description of the clear lines of responsibility,
authority, and accountability for the project as the project
continues, including descriptions of the roles and
responsibilities for each key Federal and contractor
position; and
``(E) a detailed description of the structural reforms
planned or implemented by the Secretary to ensure Phase I is
executed on time and on schedule.
``(3) Annual certification.--Not later than March 1 of each
year through 2025, the Secretary shall certify in writing to
the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of
Defense that Phase I under subsection (a) of the project
referred to in such subsection will meet--
``(A) the total cost set forth in paragraph (1) (as
adjusted pursuant to paragraph (2) if so adjusted); and
``(B) a schedule that enables, by not later than 2025--
``(i) uranium operations in building 9212 to cease; and
``(ii) uranium operations in a new facility constructed
under such project to begin.
``(4) Report.--If the Secretary of Energy does not make a
certification by March 1 of any year in which a certification
is required under paragraph (3), by not later than May 1 of
such year, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report that
identifies the resources of the Department of Energy that the
Chairman determines should be redirected to enable the
Department of Energy to meet the total cost and schedule
described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of such paragraph.'';
(2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
``(3) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary
of Energy and the Secretary of the Navy shall jointly submit
to the congressional defense committees a report detailing
the implementation of paragraphs (1) and (2), including--
``(A) a description of the program management, oversight,
design, and other responsibilities for the project referred
to in subsection (a) that are provided to the Commander of
the Naval Facilities Engineering Command pursuant to
paragraph (1); and
``(B) a description of the funding used by the Secretary
under paragraph (2) to carry out paragraph (1).''; and
(3) by striking subsections (g) and (h).

SEC. 3114. PLUTONIUM PIT PRODUCTION CAPACITY.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) In 2008, the Department of Defense and the Department
of Energy, acting through the Nuclear Weapons Council
established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code,
agreed on a strategy to balance cost, risk, and stockpile
needs and established the requirement for the Department of
Energy to produce 50 to 80 plutonium pits per year.
(2) In a memorandum of agreement dated May 3, 2010, entered
into by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy,
the Secretaries agreed that the Department of Energy would
achieve a minimum pit production capacity of 50 to 80 pits
per year by 2022.
(3) The current plans of the Secretary of Energy would
achieve a pit production capacity of 50 to 80 pits per year
by 2031, resulting in a delay of nearly a decade as compared
to the agreement described in paragraph (2).
(4) In a report dated January 14, 2014, that the Secretary
of Defense submitted to Congress, the Secretary stated that
``the Department of Defense has revalidated its requirement
for 50 - 80 pits per year based on the demands of stockpile
modernization, the commitments to a modern physical
infrastructure, and the ability to hedge against technical
failure or geopolitical risk.''.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the requirement to create a modern, responsive nuclear
infrastructure that includes the capability and capacity to
produce, at minimum, 50 to 80 pits per year, is a national
security priority;
(2) delaying creation of a modern, responsive nuclear
infrastructure until the 2030s is an unacceptable risk to the
nuclear deterrent and the national security of the United
States; and
(3) timelines for creating certain capacities for
production of plutonium pits and other nuclear weapons
components must be driven by the requirement to hedge against
technical and geopolitical risk and not solely by the needs
of life extension programs.
(c) Pit Production.--
(1) In general.--Title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense
Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 4218 the following new section:

``SEC. 4219. PLUTONIUM PIT PRODUCTION CAPACITY.

``(a) Requirement.--Consistent with the requirements of the
Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy shall ensure
that the nuclear security enterprise--
``(1) during 2023, produces not less than 30 war reserve
plutonium pits;
``(2) during 2026, produces not less than 50 war reserve
plutonium pits; and
``(3) during a pilot period of not less than 90 days during
2027, demonstrates the capability to produce war reserve
plutonium pits at a rate sufficient to produce 80 pits per
year.
``(b) Annual Certification.--Not later than March 1, 2015,
and each year thereafter through 2027, the Secretary shall
certify to the congressional defense committees and the
Secretary of Defense that the programs and budget of the
Secretary will enable the nuclear security enterprise to meet
the requirements under subsection (a).
``(c) Plan.--If the Secretary does not make a certification
by March 1 of any year in which a certification is required
under subsection (b), by not later than May 1 of such year,
the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a plan to enable the
nuclear security enterprise to meet the requirements under
subsection (b). Such plan shall include identification of the
resources of the Department of Energy that the Chairman
determines should be redirected to support the plan to meet
such requirements.''.
(2) Clerical amendment.--The table of contents for the
Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 4218 the following new item:
``Sec. 4219. Plutonium pit production capacity.''.

SEC. 3115. DEFINITION OF BASELINE AND THRESHOLD FOR STOCKPILE
LIFE EXTENSION PROJECT.

Section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2753) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by adding after the period the
following new sentence: ``In addition to the requirement
under subparagraph (B), the cost and schedule baseline of a
nuclear stockpile life extension project established under
this subparagraph shall be the cost and schedule as
determined by the weapon design and cost report required
prior to the project entering into the development
engineering phase.''; and
(2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``200'' and inserting
``150''.

SEC. 3116. PRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR WARHEAD FOR LONG-RANGE
STANDOFF WEAPON.

(a) First Production Unit.--The Secretary of Energy shall
deliver a first production unit

[[Page H4622]]

for a nuclear warhead for the long-range standoff weapon by
not later than September 30, 2025.
(b) Plan.--
(1) Development.--The Secretary of Energy and the Secretary
of Defense shall jointly develop a plan to carry out
subsection (a).
(2) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly
submit to the congressional defense committees the plan
developed under paragraph (1).
(c) Notification and Assessment.--
(1) Notification.--If at any time the Secretary of Energy
determines that the Secretary will not deliver a first
production unit for a nuclear warhead for the long-range
standoff weapon by not later than September 30, 2025, the
Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees,
the Secretary of Defense, and the Commander of the United
States Strategic Command of such determination, including an
explanation for why the delivery will be delayed.
(2) Assessment.--If the Secretary of Energy makes a
notification under paragraph (1), the Commander of the United
States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional
defense committees an assessment of the delay described in
the notification, including--
(A) the effects of such delay to national security and
nuclear deterrence and assurance; and
(B) any mitigation options available.
(d) Briefing.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in
coordination with the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command, shall provide to the congressional defense
committees a briefing on the justification of the long-range
standoff weapon, including--
(1) why such weapon is needed, including any potential
redundancies with existing weapons;
(2) the cost of such weapon; and
(3) what warhead, existing or otherwise, is planned to be
used for such weapon.

SEC. 3117. DISPOSITION OF WEAPONS-USABLE PLUTONIUM.

(a) Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility.--
(1) In general.--Of the funds described in paragraph (2),
the Secretary of Energy shall carry out construction and
program support activities relating to the MOX facility.
(2) Funds described.--The funds described in this paragraph
are the following:
(A) Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the
National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility
for construction and program support activities.
(B) Funds authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year
prior to fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security
Administration for the MOX facility for construction and
program support activities that are unobligated as of the
date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Study.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall seek to enter
into a contract with a federally funded research and
development center to conduct a study to assess and validate
the analysis of the Secretary of Energy with respect to
surplus weapon-grade plutonium options.
(2) Submission.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and
development center conducting the study under paragraph (1)
shall submit to the Secretary the study, including any
findings and recommendations.
(c) Report.--
(1) Plan.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the study
conducted under subsection (b)(1).
(2) Elements included.--The report under paragraph (1)
shall include the following:
(A) The study conducted by the federally funded research
and development center under subsection (b)(1), without
change.
(B) Identification of the alternatives to the MOX facility
considered by the Secretary, including a life-cycle cost
analysis for each such alternative.
(C) Identification of the portions of such life cycle cost
analyses that are common to all such alternatives.
(D) Discussion on continuation of the MOX facility,
including a future funding profile or a detailed discussion
of selected alternatives determined appropriate by the
Secretary for such discussion.
(E) Discussion of the issues regarding implementation of
such selected alternatives, including all regulatory and
public acceptance issues, including interactions with
affected States.
(F) Explanation of how the alternatives to the MOX facility
conform with the Plutonium Disposition Agreement, and if an
alternative does not so conform, what measures must be taken
to ensure conformance.
(G) Identification of steps the Secretary would have to
take to close out all MOX facility related activities, as
well as the associated cost.
(H) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``MOX facility'' means the mixed-oxide fuel
fabrication facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South
Carolina.
(2) The term ``Plutonium Disposition Agreement'' means the
Agreement Between the Government of the United States of
America and the Government of the Russian Federation
Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium
Designated As No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and
Related Cooperation, as amended.
(3) The term ``program support activities'' means
activities that support the design, long-lead equipment
procurement, and site preparation of the MOX facility.

SEC. 3118. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR OFFICE OF
THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY.

(a) Limitation.--Of the funds authorized to be appropriated
for fiscal year 2015 by section 3101 and available for the
Office of the Administrator as specified in the funding table
in section 4701, or otherwise made available for that Office
for that fiscal year, not more than 75 percent may be
obligated or expended until--
(1) the President transmits to Congress the matters
required to be transmitted during 2015 under section
4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2525(f)(2));
(2) the President transmits to the congressional defense
committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate,
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives the matters--
(A) required to be transmitted during 2015 under section
1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1576); and
(B) with respect to which the Secretary of Energy is
responsible;
(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense
committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate,
and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives the report required to be submitted during
2015 under section 3122(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1710); and
(4) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the
congressional defense committees the detailed report on the
stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan
required to be submitted during 2015 under section 4203(b)(2)
of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)).
(b) Office of the Administrator Defined.--In this section,
the term ``Office of the Administrator'', with respect to
accounts of the National Nuclear Security Administration,
includes any account from which funds are derived for
``Federal Salaries and Expenses''.

SEC. 3119. ADDITIONAL LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR
SECURITY.

(a) Limitation.--In addition to the limitation in section
3118, of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 by section 3101 and available for the Office of the
Administrator as specified in the funding table in section
4701, or otherwise made available for that Office for that
fiscal year, not more than 90 percent may be obligated or
expended until the date on which the Administrator for
Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense
committees a report on the efficiencies proposed by the study
titled ``2012 Joint DOE/DoD Study on Potential NNSA
Management and Work Force Prioritization Efficiencies''
conducted jointly by the Administrator and the Director of
Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. Such report shall
include details on how the Administrator will carry out
during fiscal year 2015 each efficiency measure proposed by
such joint study.
(b) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2015, the Nuclear
Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10,
United States Code, shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report that includes the following:
(1) The efficiencies that the Council recommends the
Administrator to carry out during fiscal year 2016.
(2) An assessment by the Council of--
(A) the report submitted by the Administrator under
subsection (a)(1) of section 3123 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81;
125 Stat. 1711);
(B) the report submitted by the Comptroller General of the
United States under subsection (b) of such section; and
(C) each of the matters described in subparagraphs (A)
through (E) of subsection (a)(2) of such section.
(c) Office of the Administrator Defined.--In this section,
the term ``Office of the Administrator'', with respect to
accounts of the National Nuclear Security Administration,
includes any account from which funds are derived for
``Federal Salaries and Expenses''.

SEC. 3120. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR
NONPROLIFERATION ACTIVITIES BETWEEN THE UNITED
STATES AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security
Administration may be used for any contact, cooperation, or
transfer of technology between the United States and the
Russian Federation until the Secretary of Energy, in
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Defense, certifies to the appropriate congressional
committees that--
(1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no
longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory;
(2) the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of
all Ukrainian territory;
(3) the Russian Federation is no longer acting
inconsistently with the INF Treaty; and
(4) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE
Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of
its treaty obligations.
(b) Waiver.--The Secretary of Energy may waive the
limitation in subsection (a) if--
(1) the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the
Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, submits to
the appropriate congressional committees--
(A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national
security interests of the United States and a description of
the national security interests covered by the waiver; and
(B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Energy cannot
make a certification for such under subsection (a); and
(2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on
which the Secretary submits the information in the report
under paragraph (1)(B).

[[Page H4623]]

(c) Exception for Certain Military Bases.--The
certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of
subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the
Russian Federation in Ukraine's Crimean peninsula operating
in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and
Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory
of Ukraine.
(d) Application.--The limitation in subsection (a) applies
with respect to funds described in such subsection that are
unobligated as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(e) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means
the following:
(A) The congressional defense committees.
(B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.
(2) The term ``CFE Treaty'' means the Treaty on
Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November
19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(3) The term ``INF Treaty'' means the Treaty Between the
United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and
Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at
Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1,
1988.

SEC. 3121. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEFENSE
NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION ACTIVITIES AT SITES IN
THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

(a) Limitation.--None of the funds authorized to be
appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2015 for defense nuclear nonproliferation
activities may be obligated or expended for such activities
at sites in the Russian Federation until a period of 30 days
has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of
Energy certifies to the appropriate congressional committees
that such sites are not actively engaged in Russian nuclear
weapons, intelligence, or defense activities.
(b) Waiver.--The President, without delegation, may waive
the limitation in subsection (a) if a period of 30 days has
elapsed following the date on which the President submits to
the appropriate congressional committees--
(1) notification that such a waiver is in the national
security interest of the United States; and
(2) certification that none of the funds described in
subsection (a) will be contributed to the nuclear weapons
program of Russia.
(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.--In this
section, the term ``appropriate congressional committees''
means the following:
(1) The congressional defense committees.
(2) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.

Subtitle C--Plans and Reports

SEC. 3131. COST ESTIMATION AND PROGRAM EVALUATION BY NATIONAL
NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

Section 3221(h) of the National Nuclear Security
Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2411) is amended by adding at
the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) Administration.--The term `Administration', with
respect to any authority, duty, or responsibility provided by
this section, does not include the Office of Naval
Reactors.''.

SEC. 3132. ANALYSIS AND REPORT ON W88 ALT 370 PROGRAM HIGH
EXPLOSIVES OPTIONS.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy, the
Administrator for Nuclear Security, and the Chairman of the
Nuclear Weapons Council shall jointly submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the W88 Alt 370
program that contains analyses of the costs, benefits, risks,
and feasibility of each of the following options:
(1) Incorporating a refresh of the conventional high
explosives of the W88 warhead as part of such program.
(2) Not incorporating such a refresh as part of such
program.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a)
shall include, for each option described in paragraphs (1)
and (2) of subsection (a), an analysis of the following:
(1) Near-term and lifecycle cost estimates, including costs
to both the Navy and the National Nuclear Security
Administration.
(2) Potential cost avoidance.
(3) Operational effects to the Navy and to the capacity and
throughput of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in
section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2501) of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(4) The expected longevity of the W88 warhead.
(5) Near-term and long-term safety and security risks and
potential risk-mitigation measures.
(6) Any other matters the Secretary, the Administrator, or
the Chairman considers appropriate.

SEC. 3133. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING FACILITIES.

(a) Report.--Not later than 270 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
containing an analysis of using or modifying existing
facilities across the nuclear security enterprise (as defined
in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C.
2501)) to support the plutonium strategy of the National
Nuclear Security Administration.
(b) Matters Included.--The report under subsection (a)
shall include the following:
(1) An analysis of the costs, benefits, cost-savings,
risks, and effects of using or modifying existing facilities
of the nuclear security enterprise as compared to the current
plan of the Administrator for supporting the plutonium
strategy of the Administration, including all phases of the
plan.
(2) Such other matters as the Administrator determines
appropriate.

Subtitle D--Other Matters

SEC. 3141. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE
ACT.

(a) Definitions.--Section 4002(3) of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(3)) is amended by striking
``Executive Order No. 12333 of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C.
401 note), Executive Order No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50
U.S.C. 435 note),'' and inserting ``Executive Order No. 12333
of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 3001 note), Executive Order
No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note), Executive
Order No. 13526 of December 29, 2009 (50 U.S.C. 3161
note),''.
(b) Management Structure.--Section 4102(b)(3) of such Act
(50 U.S.C. 2512(b)(3)) is amended--
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking
``for improving the'';
(2) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``for improving the''
before ``governance''; and
(3) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``relating to''
before ``any other''.
(c) Stockpile Stewardship.--Section 4203(d)(4)(A)(i) of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(d)(4)(A)(i)) is amended by striking
``50 U.S.C. 404a'' and inserting ``50 U.S.C. 3043''.
(d) Reports on Stockpile.--Section 4205(b)(2) of such Act
(50 U.S.C. 2525(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``commander''
and inserting ``Commander''.
(e) Advice on Reliability of Stockpile.--Section 4218 of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is amended--
(1) in subsection (d), by striking ``commander'' and
inserting ``Commander''; and
(2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``representatives''
and inserting ``a representative''.
(f) Disposition of Certain Plutonium.--Section 4306 of such
Act (50 U.S.C. 2566) is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)(6)(C), by striking ``paragraph (A)''
and inserting ``subparagraph (A)'';
(2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``2002'' and
inserting ``2002,''; and
(3) in subsection (d)(3), by inserting ``of Energy'' after
``Department''.
(g) Limitation on Use of Funds in Relation to F-Canyon
Facility.--Section 4454 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2638) is
amended in paragraphs (1) and (2) by inserting ``of'' after
``assessment''.
(h) Inspections of Certain Facilities.--Section 4501(a) of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended by striking ``nuclear
weapons facility'' and inserting ``national security
laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility''.
(i) Notice Relating to Certain Failures.--Section 4505 of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2656) is amended--
(1) in subsection (b), by striking the subsection heading
and inserting the following: ``Significant Atomic Energy
Defense Intelligence Losses''; and
(2) in subsection (e)(2), by striking ``50 U.S.C. 413'' and
inserting ``50 U.S.C. 3091''.
(j) Review of Certain Documents Before Declassification and
Release.--Section 4521(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2671(b)) is
amended by striking ``Executive Order 12958'' and inserting
``Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)''.
(k) Protection Against Release of Restricted Data.--Section
4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Executive Order No.
12958 (50 U.S.C. 435 note)'' and inserting ``Executive Order
No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)'';
(2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``Executive Order No.
12958'' and inserting ``Executive Order No. 13526'';
(3) in subsection (f)(2), by striking ``Executive Order No.
12958'' and inserting ``Executive Order No. 13526''.
(l) Identification of Declassification Activities in Budget
Materials.--Section 4525(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675(a))
is amended by striking ``Executive Order No. 12958 (50 U.S.C.
435 note)'' and inserting ``Executive Order No. 13526 (50
U.S.C. 3161 note)''.
(m) Workforce Restructuring Plan.--Section 4604(f)(3) of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704(f)(3)) is amended by striking
``Nevada and'' and inserting ``Nevada, and''.
(n) Availability of Funds.--Section 4709(b) of such Act (50
U.S.C. 2749(b)) is amended by striking ``athorization'' and
inserting ``authorization''.
(o) Transfer of Defense Environmental Cleanup Funds.--
Section 4710(b)(3)(B) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750(b)(3)(B))
is amended by striking ``management'' and inserting
``cleanup''.
(p) Restriction on Use of Funds to Pay Certain Penalties.--
Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762) is amended--
(1) by inserting an em dash after ``Department of Energy
if'';
(2) by realigning paragraphs (1) and (2) so as to be
indented two ems from the left margin; and
(3) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, or'' and inserting
``; or''.
(q) Research and Development by Certain Facilities.--
Section 4832(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2812(a)) is amended by
striking ``for Nuclear Security''.
(r) Report on Hanford Tank Safety.--Section 4441 of such
Act (50 U.S.C. 2621) is amended by striking subsection (d).
(s) Critical Technology Partnerships.--Section 4813(a) of
such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794(a)) is amended by striking ``that
atomic energy defense activities research on, and development
of, any dual-use critical technology'' and inserting ``that
research on and development of dual-use critical technology
carried out through atomic energy defense activities''.

[[Page H4624]]

(t) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for such Act
is amended by striking the item relating to section 4710 and
inserting the following:
``Sec. 4710. Transfer of defense environmental cleanup
funds.''.

SEC. 3142. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION ACT.

(a) Status of Certain Personnel.--Section 3220(c) of the
National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C.
2410(c)) is amended--
(1) by inserting an em dash after ``activities between'';
(2) by realigning paragraphs (1) and (2) so as to be
indented two ems from the left margin; and
(3) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, and'' and inserting
``; and''.
(b) Congressional Oversight of Certain Programs.--Section
3236(a)(2)(B)(iv) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2426(a)(2)(B)(iv))
is amended--
(1) by inserting an em dash after ``program for'';
(2) by realigning subclauses (I), (II), and (III) so as to
be indented six ems from the left margin; and
(3) in subclause (I), by striking ``year,'' and inserting
``year;'' and
(4) in subclause (II), by striking ``, and'' and inserting
``; and''.

TITLE XXXII--DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION.

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year
2015, $30,150,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).

SEC. 3202. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES
SAFETY BOARD.

Subsection (a) of section 322 of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286k(a)) is amended to read as follows:
``(a) In General.--The Inspector General of the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission shall serve as the Inspector General of
the Board, in accordance with the Inspector General Act of
1978 (5 U.S.C. App.).''.

SEC. 3203. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES OF DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES
SAFETY BOARD.

(a) In General.--Section 313(b)(1)(A) of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286b(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking
``150 full-time employees'' and inserting ``120 full-time
employees''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a)
shall take effect on October 1, 2015.

TITLE XXXIV--NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

(a) Amount.--There are hereby authorized to be appropriated
to the Secretary of Energy $19,950,000 for fiscal year 2015
for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641
of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval
petroleum reserves.
(b) Period of Availability.--Funds appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall
remain available until expended.

TITLE XXXV--MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL
SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2015.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015, to be available without fiscal year limitation if
so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the
Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration
programs associated with maintaining national security
aspects of the merchant marine, as follows:
(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United
States Merchant Marine Academy, $79,790,000, of which--
(A) $65,290,000 shall remain available until expended for
Academy operations;
(B) $14,500,000 shall remain available until expended for
capital asset management at the Academy.
(2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime
academies, $17,650,000, of which--
(A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended for
student incentive payments;
(B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended for
direct payments to such academies;
(C) $11,300,000 shall remain available until expended for
maintenance and repair of State maritime academy training
vessels; and
(D) $350,000 shall remain available until expended for
improving the monitoring of graduates' service obligation.
(3) For expenses necessary to support Maritime
Administration operations and programs, $50,960,000.
(4) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the
National Defense Reserve Fleet, $4,800,000, to remain
available until expended.
(5) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-
flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of
the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United
States Code, $186,000,000.
(6) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the
Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan
guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of
title 46, United States Code, $73,100,000, of which
$3,100,000 shall remain available until expended for
administrative expenses of the program.

SEC. 3502. SPECIAL RULE FOR DD-17.

(a) In General.--A vessel of the Navy transported in DD-17
(formerly known as USN-YFD-17) in the waters of the State of
Alabama shall not be treated as merchandise for purposes of
section 55102 of title 46, United States Code.
(b) Limitation.--If DD-17 (formerly known as USN-YFD-17) is
sold after the date of the enactment of this Act, subsection
(a) shall cease to have effect unless the purchaser of DD-17
is an eligible owner described in section 12103(b) of title
46, United States Code.

SEC. 3503. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC MARITIME
INDUSTRY IN NATIONAL SECURITY.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) the United States domestic maritime industry carries
hundreds of million of tons of cargo annually, supports
nearly 500,000 jobs, and provides nearly 100 billion in
annual economic output;
(2) the Nation's military sealift capacity will benefit
from one of the fastest growing segments of the domestic
trades, 14 domestic trade tankers that are on order to be
constructed at United States shipyards as of February 1,
2014;
(3) the domestic trades' vessel innovations that
transformed worldwide maritime commerce include the
development of containerships, self-unloading vessels,
articulated tug-barges, trailer barges, chemical parcel
tankers, railroad-on-barge carfloats, and river flotilla
towing systems;
(4) the national security benefits of the domestic maritime
industry are unquestioned as the Department of Defense
depends on United States domestic trades' fleet of container
ships, roll-on/roll-off ships, and product tankers to carry
military cargoes;
(5) the Department of Defense benefits from a robust
commercial shipyard and ship repair industry and current
growth in that sector is particularly important as Federal
budget cuts may reduce the number of new constructed military
vessels; and
(6) the domestic fleet is essential to national security
and was a primary source of mariners needed to crew United
States Government-owned sealift vessels activated from
reserve status during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi
Freedom in the period 2002 through 2010.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
United States coastwise trade laws promote a strong domestic
trade maritime industry, which supports the national security
and economic vitality of the United States and the efficient
operation of the United States transportation system.

DIVISION D--FUNDING TABLES

SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TABLES.

(a) In General.--Whenever a funding table in this division
specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program,
or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified
dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby
authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
(b) Merit-based Decisions.--A decision to commit, obligate,
or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of
a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall--
(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in
accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374
of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive
procedures; and
(2) comply with other applicable provisions of law.
(c) Relationship to Transfer and Programming Authority.--An
amount specified in the funding tables in this division may
be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or
reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this
Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an
amount specified in such funding tables shall not count
against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under
section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other
provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would
move funds between appropriation accounts.
(d) Applicability to Classified Annex.--This section
applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.
(e) Oral and Written Communications.--No oral or written
communication concerning any amount specified in the funding
tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of
this section.

TITLE XLI--PROCUREMENT

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2015 House
Line Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
FIXED WING
002 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT. 13,617 13,617
003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR 185,090 185,090
(ACS) (MIP).

[[Page H4625]]

004 MQ-1 UAV............. 190,581 239,581
Extended range [49,000]
modifications Per
Army UFR.
005 RQ-11 (RAVEN)........ 3,964 3,964
ROTARY
006 HELICOPTER, LIGHT 416,617 416,617
UTILITY (LUH).
007 AH-64 APACHE BLOCK 494,009 494,009
IIIA REMAN.
008 ADVANCE 157,338 157,338
PROCUREMENT (CY).
012 UH-60 BLACKHAWK M 1,237,001 1,335,401
MODEL (MYP).
ARNG [98,400]
Modernization-6
additional UH-60M
aircraft.
013 ADVANCE 132,138 132,138
PROCUREMENT (CY).
014 CH-47 HELICOPTER..... 892,504 892,504
015 ADVANCE 102,361 102,361
PROCUREMENT (CY).
MODIFICATION OF
AIRCRAFT
016 MQ-1 PAYLOAD (MIP)... 26,913 26,913
018 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP). 14,182 14,182
019 MULTI SENSOR ABN 131,892 131,892
RECON (MIP).
020 AH-64 MODS........... 181,869 181,869
021 CH-47 CARGO 32,092 32,092
HELICOPTER MODS
(MYP).
022 UTILITY/CARGO 15,029 15,029
AIRPLANE MODS.
023 UTILITY HELICOPTER 76,515 83,315
MODS.
ARNG [6,800]
Modernization-UH-
60A to UH-60L
conversions.
025 NETWORK AND MISSION 114,182 114,182
PLAN.
026 COMMS, NAV 115,795 115,795
SURVEILLANCE.
027 GATM ROLLUP.......... 54,277 54,277
028 RQ-7 UAV MODS........ 125,380 125,380
GROUND SUPPORT
AVIONICS
029 AIRCRAFT 66,450 98,850
SURVIVABILITY
EQUIPMENT.
Army requested [32,400]
realignment.
030 SURVIVABILITY CM..... 7,800
Army requested [7,800]
realignment.
031 CMWS................. 107,364 60,364
Army requested [-47,000]
reduction.
OTHER SUPPORT
032 AVIONICS SUPPORT 6,847 6,847
EQUIPMENT.
033 COMMON GROUND 29,231 29,231
EQUIPMENT.
034 AIRCREW INTEGRATED 48,081 48,081
SYSTEMS.
035 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL.. 127,232 127,232
036 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 1,203 1,203
037 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET 2,931 2,931
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 5,102,685 5,250,085
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
ARMY
SURFACE-TO-AIR
MISSILE SYSTEM
002 LOWER TIER AIR AND 110,300 110,300
MISSILE DEFENSE
(AMD).
003 MSE MISSILE.......... 384,605 384,605
AIR-TO-SURFACE
MISSILE SYSTEM
004 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY. 4,452 4,452
ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT
MISSILE SYS
005 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) 77,668 77,668
SYSTEM SUMMARY.
006 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY. 50,368 50,368
007 ADVANCE 19,984 19,984
PROCUREMENT (CY).
008 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET 127,145 127,145
(GMLRS).
009 MLRS REDUCED RANGE 21,274 21,274
PRACTICE ROCKETS
(RRPR).
MODIFICATIONS
012 PATRIOT MODS......... 131,838 131,838
013 STINGER MODS......... 1,355 1,355
014 AVENGER MODS......... 5,611 5,611
015 ITAS/TOW MODS........ 19,676 19,676
016 MLRS MODS............ 10,380 10,380
017 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS. 6,008 6,008
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
018 SPARES AND REPAIR 36,930 36,930
PARTS.
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
019 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS.. 3,657 3,657
020 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 1,522 1,522
(MISSILES).
021 PRODUCTION BASE 4,710 4,710
SUPPORT.
TOTAL MISSILE 1,017,483 1,017,483
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV,
ARMY
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
001 STRYKER VEHICLE...... 385,110 385,110
MODIFICATION OF
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
002 STRYKER (MOD)........ 39,683 89,683
Unfunded [50,000]
requirement-
Fourth DVH
Brigade Set.
003 FIST VEHICLE (MOD)... 26,759 26,759
004 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) 107,506 107,506
005 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 45,411 45,411
155MM M109A6 (MOD).
006 PALADIN INTEGRATED 247,400 247,400
MANAGEMENT (PIM).
007 IMPROVED RECOVERY 50,451 50,451
VEHICLE (M88A2
HERCULES).
008 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD). 2,473 2,473
009 ASSAULT BREACHER 36,583 36,583
VEHICLE.
010 M88 FOV MODS......... 1,975 73,975

[[Page H4626]]

Unfunded [72,000]
requirement-
Industrial Base
Initiative.
011 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE. 49,462 49,462
012 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD). 237,023 237,023
013 ABRAMS UPGRADE 120,000
PROGRAM.
Industrial Base [120,000]
initiative.
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
014 PRODUCTION BASE 6,478 6,478
SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV).
WEAPONS & OTHER
COMBAT VEHICLES
016 MORTAR SYSTEMS....... 5,012 5,012
017 XM320 GRENADE 28,390 28,390
LAUNCHER MODULE
(GLM).
018 COMPACT SEMI- 148 148
AUTOMATIC SNIPER
SYSTEM.
019 CARBINE.............. 29,366 20,616
Army requested [-8,750]
realignment.
021 COMMON REMOTELY 8,409 8,409
OPERATED WEAPONS
STATION.
022 HANDGUN.............. 3,957 1,957
Funding ahead of [-2,000]
need.
MOD OF WEAPONS AND
OTHER COMBAT VEH
024 M777 MODS............ 18,166 18,166
025 M4 CARBINE MODS...... 3,446 6,446
Army requested [3,000]
realignment.
026 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN 25,296 25,296
MODS.
027 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN 5,546 5,546
MODS.
028 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE 4,635 2,635
GUN MODS.
Army requested [-2,000]
realignment.
029 SNIPER RIFLES 4,079 4,079
MODIFICATIONS.
030 M119 MODIFICATIONS... 72,718 72,718
031 M16 RIFLE MODS....... 1,952 0
Army requested [-1,952]
realignment.
032 MORTAR MODIFICATION.. 8,903 8,903
033 MODIFICATIONS LESS 2,089 2,089
THAN $5.0M (WOCV-
WTCV).
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
034 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 2,005 2,005
(WOCV-WTCV).
035 PRODUCTION BASE 8,911 8,911
SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV).
036 INDUSTRIAL 414 414
PREPAREDNESS.
037 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT 1,682 1,682
(SOLDIER ENH PROG).
TOTAL 1,471,438 1,701,736
PROCUREMENT OF
W&TCV, ARMY.

PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY
SMALL/MEDIUM CAL
AMMUNITION
001 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL 34,943 34,943
TYPES.
002 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL 12,418 12,418
TYPES.
003 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL 9,655 8,155
TYPES.
Funding ahead of [-1,500]
need.
004 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL 29,304 29,304
TYPES.
006 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES. 8,181 8,181
007 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES. 52,667 52,667
008 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES. 40,904 40,904
MORTAR AMMUNITION
009 60MM MORTAR, ALL 41,742 41,742
TYPES.
010 81MM MORTAR, ALL 42,433 42,433
TYPES.
011 120MM MORTAR, ALL 39,365 39,365
TYPES.
TANK AMMUNITION
012 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 101,900 101,900
105MM AND 120MM, ALL
TYPES.
ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
013 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 37,455 37,455
75MM & 105MM, ALL
TYPES.
014 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 47,023 47,023
155MM, ALL TYPES.
015 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED 35,672 35,672
RANGE M982.
016 ARTILLERY 94,010 74,010
PROPELLANTS, FUZES
AND PRIMERS, ALL.
Precision Guided [-20,000]
Kits Schedule
Delay.
ROCKETS
019 SHOULDER LAUNCHED 945 945
MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES.
020 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL 27,286 27,286
TYPES.
OTHER AMMUNITION
021 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, 22,899 22,899
ALL TYPES.
022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 22,751 22,751
023 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES... 7,082 7,082
024 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES 11,638 11,638
MISCELLANEOUS
025 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL 3,594 3,594
TYPES.
027 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES.... 5,430 5,430
028 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 8,337 8,337
MILLION (AMMO).
029 AMMUNITION PECULIAR 14,906 14,906
EQUIPMENT.
030 FIRST DESTINATION 14,349 14,349
TRANSPORTATION
(AMMO).
031 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES. 111 111
PRODUCTION BASE
SUPPORT
032 PROVISION OF 148,092 146,192
INDUSTRIAL
FACILITIES.
Unjustified [-1,900]
request.
033 CONVENTIONAL 113,881 113,881
MUNITIONS
DEMILITARIZATION.
034 ARMS INITIATIVE...... 2,504 2,504
TOTAL 1,031,477 1,008,077
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, ARMY.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
ARMY

[[Page H4627]]

TACTICAL VEHICLES
001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/ 7,987 7,987
DOLLY SETS.
002 SEMITRAILERS, 160 160
FLATBED:.
004 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL 164,615 164,615
VEHICLE.
005 FAMILY OF MEDIUM 50,000
TACTICAL VEH (FMTV).
Additional FMTVs - [50,000]
Industrial Base
initiative.
006 FIRETRUCKS & 8,415 8,415
ASSOCIATED
FIREFIGHTING EQUIP.
007 FAMILY OF HEAVY 28,425 78,425
TACTICAL VEHICLES
(FHTV).
Additional HEMTT [50,000]
ESP Vehicles-
Industrial Base
initiative.
008 PLS ESP.............. 89,263 89,263
013 TACTICAL WHEELED 38,226 38,226
VEHICLE PROTECTION
KITS.
014 MODIFICATION OF IN 91,173 83,173
SVC EQUIP.
Early to need.... [-8,000]
015 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH- 14,731 14,731
PROTECTED (MRAP)
MODS.
NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
016 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN.. 175 175
017 PASSENGER CARRYING 1,338 1,338
VEHICLES.
018 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, 11,101 11,101
OTHER.
COMM--JOINT
COMMUNICATIONS
019 WIN-T--GROUND FORCES 763,087 638,087
TACTICAL NETWORK.
Unobligated [-125,000]
balances.
020 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION 21,157 21,157
PROGRAM.
021 JOINT INCIDENT SITE 7,915 7,915
COMMUNICATIONS
CAPABILITY.
022 JCSE EQUIPMENT 5,440 5,440
(USREDCOM).
COMM--SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS
023 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE 118,085 118,085
WIDEBAND SATCOM
SYSTEMS.
024 TRANSPORTABLE 13,999 13,999
TACTICAL COMMAND
COMMUNICATIONS.
025 SHF TERM............. 6,494 6,494
026 NAVSTAR GLOBAL 1,635 1,635
POSITIONING SYSTEM
(SPACE).
027 SMART-T (SPACE)...... 13,554 13,554
028 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC-- 18,899 18,899
GBS.
029 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 2,849 2,849
(TAC SAT).
030 ENROUTE MISSION 100,000 100,000
COMMAND (EMC).
COMM--COMBAT
COMMUNICATIONS
033 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO 175,711 125,711
SYSTEM.
Unobligated [-50,000]
balances.
034 MID-TIER NETWORKING 9,692 4,692
VEHICULAR RADIO
(MNVR).
Unobligated [-5,000]
balances.
035 RADIO TERMINAL SET, 17,136 17,136
MIDS LVT(2).
037 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS-- 22,099 22,099
OPA2.
038 TRACTOR DESK......... 3,724 3,724
039 SPIDER APLA REMOTE 969 969
CONTROL UNIT.
040 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT 294 294
PROGRAM COMM/
ELECTRONICS.
041 TACTICAL 24,354 24,354
COMMUNICATIONS AND
PROTECTIVE SYSTEM.
042 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE 17,445 17,445
043 RADIO, IMPROVED HF 1,028 1,028
(COTS) FAMILY.
044 FAMILY OF MED COMM 22,614 22,614
FOR COMBAT CASUALTY
CARE.
COMM--INTELLIGENCE
COMM
046 CI AUTOMATION 1,519 1,519
ARCHITECTURE.
047 ARMY CA/MISO GPF 12,478 12,478
EQUIPMENT.
INFORMATION SECURITY
050 INFORMATION SYSTEM 2,113 2,113
SECURITY PROGRAM-
ISSP.
051 COMMUNICATIONS 69,646 69,646
SECURITY (COMSEC).
COMM--LONG HAUL
COMMUNICATIONS
052 BASE SUPPORT 28,913 28,913
COMMUNICATIONS.
COMM--BASE
COMMUNICATIONS
053 INFORMATION SYSTEMS.. 97,091 97,091
054 DEFENSE MESSAGE 246 246
SYSTEM (DMS).
055 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 5,362 5,362
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
056 INSTALLATION INFO 79,965 79,965
INFRASTRUCTURE MOD
PROGRAM.
ELECT EQUIP--TACT INT
REL ACT (TIARA)
060 JTT/CIBS-M........... 870 870
061 PROPHET GROUND....... 55,896 55,896
063 DCGS-A (MIP)......... 128,207 128,207
064 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND 5,286 5,286
STATION (JTAGS).
065 TROJAN (MIP)......... 12,614 12,614
066 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 3,901 3,901
(INTEL SPT) (MIP).
067 CI HUMINT AUTO 7,392 7,392
REPRTING AND
COLL(CHARCS).
ELECT EQUIP--
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
(EW)
068 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER 24,828 24,828
MORTAR RADAR.
070 AIR VIGILANCE (AV)... 7,000 7,000
072 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/ 1,285 1,285
SECURITY
COUNTERMEASURES.
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
SURV. (TAC SURV)
075 SENTINEL MODS........ 44,305 44,305
076 NIGHT VISION DEVICES. 160,901 160,901
078 SMALL TACTICAL 18,520 18,520
OPTICAL RIFLE
MOUNTED MLRF.
080 INDIRECT FIRE 68,296 68,296
PROTECTION FAMILY OF
SYSTEMS.
081 FAMILY OF WEAPON 49,205 34,205
SIGHTS (FWS).
Early to need.... [-15,000]
082 ARTILLERY ACCURACY 4,896 4,896
EQUIP.
083 PROFILER............. 3,115 3,115
084 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 4,186 4,186
(FIREFINDER RADARS).

[[Page H4628]]

085 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND-- 97,892 87,892
PLATFORM (JBC-P).
Schedule delay... [-10,000]
086 JOINT EFFECTS 27,450 27,450
TARGETING SYSTEM
(JETS).
087 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP 14,085 14,085
(LLDR).
088 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL 29,040 29,040
SYSTEM.
089 COUNTERFIRE RADARS... 209,050 159,050
Excessive LRIP/ [-50,000]
concurrency costs.
ELECT EQUIP--TACTICAL
C2 SYSTEMS
092 FIRE SUPPORT C2 13,823 13,823
FAMILY.
095 AIR & MSL DEFENSE 27,374 27,374
PLANNING & CONTROL
SYS.
097 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE 2,508 2,508
SUPPORT (LCSS).
099 NETWORK MANAGEMENT 21,524 21,524
INITIALIZATION AND
SERVICE.
100 MANEUVER CONTROL 95,455 95,455
SYSTEM (MCS).
101 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT 118,600 118,600
SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A).
102 INTEGRATED PERSONNEL 32,970 32,970
AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY
(IPP.
104 RECONNAISSANCE AND 10,113 10,113
SURVEYING INSTRUMENT
SET.
ELECT EQUIP--
AUTOMATION
105 ARMY TRAINING 9,015 9,015
MODERNIZATION.
106 AUTOMATED DATA 155,223 155,223
PROCESSING EQUIP.
107 GENERAL FUND 16,581 16,581
ENTERPRISE BUSINESS
SYSTEMS FAM.
108 HIGH PERF COMPUTING 65,252 65,252
MOD PGM (HPCMP).
110 RESERVE COMPONENT 17,631 17,631
AUTOMATION SYS
(RCAS).
ELECT EQUIP--AUDIO
VISUAL SYS (A/V)
112 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M 5,437 5,437
(SURVEYING
EQUIPMENT).
ELECT EQUIP--SUPPORT
113 PRODUCTION BASE 426 426
SUPPORT (C-E).
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
114A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 3,707 3,707
CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE
EQUIPMENT
115 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL 937 937
EQUIPMENT (FNLE).
116 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS 1,930 1,930
(BDS).
117 CBRN DEFENSE......... 17,468 17,468
BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
119 TACTICAL BRIDGE, 5,442 5,442
FLOAT-RIBBON.
120 COMMON BRIDGE 11,013 11,013
TRANSPORTER (CBT)
RECAP.
ENGINEER (NON-
CONSTRUCTION)
EQUIPMENT
121 GRND STANDOFF MINE 37,649 33,249
DETECTN SYSM
(GSTAMIDS).
Early to need.... [-4,400]
122 HUSKY MOUNTED 18,545 18,545
DETECTION SYSTEM
(HMDS).
123 ROBOTIC COMBAT 4,701 4,701
SUPPORT SYSTEM
(RCSS).
124 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS 6,346 6,346
RECAPITALIZATION.
125 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 15,856 15,856
DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD
EQPMT).
126 REMOTE DEMOLITION 4,485 4,485
SYSTEMS.
127 $5M, COUNTERMINE 4,938 4,938
EQUIPMENT.
COMBAT SERVICE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
128 HEATERS AND ECU'S.... 9,235 9,235
130 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT.. 1,677 1,677
131 PERSONNEL RECOVERY 16,728 16,728
SUPPORT SYSTEM
(PRSS).
132 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM 84,761 84,761
134 FIELD FEEDING 15,179 15,179
EQUIPMENT.
135 CARGO AERIAL DEL & 28,194 28,194
PERSONNEL PARACHUTE
SYSTEM.
137 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT 41,967 41,967
AND CONSTRUCTION
SETS.
138 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M 20,090 20,090
(ENG SPT).
PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
139 QUALITY SURVEILLANCE 1,435 1,435
EQUIPMENT.
140 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, 40,692 40,692
PETROLEUM & WATER.
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
141 COMBAT SUPPORT 46,957 46,957
MEDICAL.
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
142 MOBILE MAINTENANCE 23,758 23,758
EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS.
143 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 2,789 2,789
(MAINT EQ).
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT
144 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, 5,827 5,827
HVY, 6X4 (CCE).
145 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING 14,926 14,926
147 COMPACTOR............ 4,348 4,348
148 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR.. 4,938 4,938
149 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED 34,071 34,071
150 ALL TERRAIN CRANES... 4,938 4,938
151 PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING 667 667
153 ENHANCED RAPID 14,924 14,924
AIRFIELD
CONSTRUCTION CAPAP.
154 CONST EQUIP ESP...... 15,933 15,933
155 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 6,749 6,749
(CONST EQUIP).
RAIL FLOAT
CONTAINERIZATION
EQUIPMENT
156 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP.. 10,509 10,509
157 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M 2,166 2,166
(FLOAT/RAIL).
GENERATORS
158 GENERATORS AND 115,190 105,190
ASSOCIATED EQUIP.
Cost savings from [-10,000]
new contract.
MATERIAL HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
160 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS.. 14,327 14,327
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
161 COMBAT TRAINING 65,062 65,062
CENTERS SUPPORT.

[[Page H4629]]

162 TRAINING DEVICES, 101,295 101,295
NONSYSTEM.
163 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL 13,406 13,406
TRAINER.
164 AVIATION COMBINED 14,440 14,440
ARMS TACTICAL
TRAINER.
165 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN 10,165 10,165
SUPPORT OF ARMY
TRAINING.
TEST MEASURE AND DIG
EQUIPMENT (TMD)
166 CALIBRATION SETS 5,726 5,726
EQUIPMENT.
167 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF 37,482 37,482
TEST EQUIPMENT
(IFTE).
168 TEST EQUIPMENT 16,061 16,061
MODERNIZATION
(TEMOD).
OTHER SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
170 RAPID EQUIPPING 2,380 2,380
SOLDIER SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT.
171 PHYSICAL SECURITY 30,686 30,686
SYSTEMS (OPA3).
172 BASE LEVEL COMMON 1,008 1,008
EQUIPMENT.
173 MODIFICATION OF IN- 98,559 83,559
SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA-
3).
Early to need-- [-15,000]
watercraft C4ISR.
174 PRODUCTION BASE 1,697 1,697
SUPPORT (OTH).
175 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR 25,394 25,394
USER TESTING.
176 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS 12,975 12,975
OPA3.
OPA2
180 INITIAL SPARES--C&E.. 50,032 50,032
TOTAL OTHER 4,893,634 4,701,234
PROCUREMENT,
ARMY.

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE
DEV DEFEAT FUND
STAFF AND
INFRASTRUCTURE
004 OPERATIONS........... 115,058 0
Transfer of [-65,558]
JIEDDO to
Overseas
Contingency
Operations.
Unjustified [-49,500]
request.
TOTAL JOINT IMPR 115,058 0
EXPLOSIVE DEV
DEFEAT FUND.

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
COMBAT AIRCRAFT
001 EA-18G............... 43,547 493,547
Additional EA-18G [450,000]
aircraft.
005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER 610,652 610,652
CV.
006 ADVANCE 29,400 29,400
PROCUREMENT (CY).
007 JSF STOVL............ 1,200,410 1,200,410
008 ADVANCE 143,885 143,885
PROCUREMENT (CY).
009 V-22 (MEDIUM LIFT)... 1,487,000 1,487,000
010 ADVANCE 45,920 45,920
PROCUREMENT (CY).
011 H-1 UPGRADES (UH-1Y/ 778,757 778,757
AH-1Z).
012 ADVANCE 80,926 80,926
PROCUREMENT (CY).
013 MH-60S (MYP)......... 210,209 210,209
015 MH-60R (MYP)......... 933,882 880,482
CVN 73 Refueling [-53,400]
and Complex
Overhaul (RCOH).
016 ADVANCE 106,686 106,686
PROCUREMENT (CY).
017 P-8A POSEIDON........ 2,003,327 2,003,327
018 ADVANCE 48,457 48,457
PROCUREMENT (CY).
019 E-2D ADV HAWKEYE..... 819,870 819,870
020 ADVANCE 225,765 225,765
PROCUREMENT (CY).
OTHER AIRCRAFT
023 KC-130J.............. 92,290 92,290
026 ADVANCE 37,445 37,445
PROCUREMENT (CY).
027 MQ-8 UAV............. 40,663 40,663
MODIFICATION OF
AIRCRAFT
029 EA-6 SERIES.......... 10,993 10,993
030 AEA SYSTEMS.......... 34,768 34,768
031 AV-8 SERIES.......... 65,472 65,472
032 ADVERSARY............ 8,418 8,418
033 F-18 SERIES.......... 679,177 679,177
034 H-46 SERIES.......... 480 480
036 H-53 SERIES.......... 38,159 38,159
037 SH-60 SERIES......... 108,850 108,850
038 H-1 SERIES........... 45,033 45,033
039 EP-3 SERIES.......... 32,890 50,890
Obsolescence [5,000]
issues.
SIGINT [13,000]
Architecture
Modernization
Common
Configuration.
040 P-3 SERIES........... 2,823 2,823
041 E-2 SERIES........... 21,208 21,208
042 TRAINER A/C SERIES... 12,608 12,608
044 C-130 SERIES......... 40,378 40,378
045 FEWSG................ 640 640
046 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C 4,635 4,635
SERIES.
047 E-6 SERIES........... 212,876 212,876
048 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS 71,328 71,328
SERIES.
049 SPECIAL PROJECT 21,317 21,317
AIRCRAFT.
050 T-45 SERIES.......... 90,052 90,052
051 POWER PLANT CHANGES.. 19,094 19,094
052 JPATS SERIES......... 1,085 1,085
054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT. 155,644 155,644
055 COMMON AVIONICS 157,531 157,531
CHANGES.
056 COMMON DEFENSIVE 1,958 1,958
WEAPON SYSTEM.
057 ID SYSTEMS........... 38,880 38,880
058 P-8 SERIES........... 29,797 29,797

[[Page H4630]]

059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION 14,770 14,770
060 MQ-8 SERIES.......... 8,741 8,741
061 RQ-7 SERIES.......... 2,542 2,542
062 V-22 (TILT/ROTOR 135,584 135,584
ACFT) OSPREY.
063 F-35 STOVL SERIES.... 285,968 285,968
064 F-35 CV SERIES....... 20,502 20,502
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
065 SPARES AND REPAIR 1,229,651 1,226,651
PARTS.
Program decrease. [-3,000]
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
EQUIP & FACILITIES
066 COMMON GROUND 418,355 418,355
EQUIPMENT.
067 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL 23,843 23,843
FACILITIES.
068 WAR CONSUMABLES...... 15,939 15,939
069 OTHER PRODUCTION 5,630 5,630
CHARGES.
070 SPECIAL SUPPORT 65,839 65,839
EQUIPMENT.
071 FIRST DESTINATION 1,768 1,768
TRANSPORTATION.
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 13,074,317 13,485,917
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
MODIFICATION OF
MISSILES
001 TRIDENT II MODS...... 1,190,455 1,190,455
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL 5,671 5,671
FACILITIES.
STRATEGIC MISSILES
003 TOMAHAWK............. 194,258 276,258
Minimum [82,000]
sustaining rate
increase.
TACTICAL MISSILES
004 AMRAAM............... 32,165 22,165
Program decrease. [-10,000]
005 SIDEWINDER........... 73,928 73,928
006 JSOW................. 130,759 130,759
007 STANDARD MISSILE..... 445,836 445,836
008 RAM.................. 80,792 80,792
011 STAND OFF PRECISION 1,810 1,810
GUIDED MUNITIONS
(SOPGM).
012 AERIAL TARGETS....... 48,046 48,046
013 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT 3,295 3,295
MODIFICATION OF
MISSILES
014 ESSM................. 119,434 119,434
015 HARM MODS............ 111,739 111,739
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT &
FACILITIES
016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL 2,531 2,531
FACILITIES.
017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM 208,700 199,700
FOLLOW-ON.
Excess to need... [-9,000]
ORDNANCE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
018 ORDNANCE SUPPORT 73,211 73,211
EQUIPMENT.
TORPEDOES AND RELATED
EQUIP
019 SSTD................. 6,562 6,562
020 MK-48 TORPEDO........ 14,153 14,153
021 ASW TARGETS.......... 2,515 2,515
MOD OF TORPEDOES AND
RELATED EQUIP
022 MK-54 TORPEDO MODS... 98,928 98,928
023 MK-48 TORPEDO ADCAP 46,893 46,893
MODS.
024 QUICKSTRIKE MINE..... 6,966 6,966
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
025 TORPEDO SUPPORT 52,670 52,670
EQUIPMENT.
026 ASW RANGE SUPPORT.... 3,795 3,795
DESTINATION
TRANSPORTATION
027 FIRST DESTINATION 3,692 3,692
TRANSPORTATION.
GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
028 SMALL ARMS AND 13,240 13,240
WEAPONS.
MODIFICATION OF GUNS
AND GUN MOUNTS
029 CIWS MODS............ 75,108 75,108
030 COAST GUARD WEAPONS.. 18,948 18,948
031 GUN MOUNT MODS....... 62,651 62,651
033 AIRBORNE MINE 15,006 15,006
NEUTRALIZATION
SYSTEMS.
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
035 SPARES AND REPAIR 74,188 74,188
PARTS.
TOTAL WEAPONS 3,217,945 3,280,945
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO,
NAVY & MC
NAVY AMMUNITION
001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 107,069 107,069
002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL 70,396 70,396
TYPES.
003 MACHINE GUN 20,284 20,284
AMMUNITION.
004 PRACTICE BOMBS....... 26,701 26,701
005 CARTRIDGES & CART 53,866 53,866
ACTUATED DEVICES.
006 AIR EXPENDABLE 59,294 59,294
COUNTERMEASURES.
007 JATOS................ 2,766 2,766
008 LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE 113,092 113,092
ATTACK PROJECTILE.
009 5 INCH/54 GUN 35,702 35,702
AMMUNITION.
010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER 36,475 36,475
GUN AMMUNITION.
011 OTHER SHIP GUN 43,906 43,906
AMMUNITION.

[[Page H4631]]

012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING 51,535 51,535
PARTY AMMO.
013 PYROTECHNIC AND 11,652 11,652
DEMOLITION.
014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN 4,473 4,473
$5 MILLION.
MARINE CORPS
AMMUNITION
015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION 31,708 31,708
016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL 692 692
TYPES.
017 40 MM, ALL TYPES..... 13,630 13,630
018 60MM, ALL TYPES...... 2,261 2,261
019 81MM, ALL TYPES...... 1,496 1,496
020 120MM, ALL TYPES..... 14,855 14,855
022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES.. 4,000 4,000
023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES... 16,853 16,853
024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES. 14,772 14,772
026 FUZE, ALL TYPES...... 9,972 9,972
027 NON LETHALS.......... 998 998
028 AMMO MODERNIZATION... 12,319 12,319
029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 11,178 11,178
MILLION.
TOTAL 771,945 771,945
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMO, NAVY & MC.

SHIPBUILDING &
CONVERSION, NAVY
OTHER WARSHIPS
001 CARRIER REPLACEMENT 1,300,000 1,300,000
PROGRAM.
002 VIRGINIA CLASS 3,553,254 3,553,254
SUBMARINE.
003 ADVANCE 2,330,325 2,330,325
PROCUREMENT (CY).
004 CVN REFUELING 483,600
OVERHAULS.
CVN 73 Refueling [483,600]
and Complex
Overhaul (RCOH).
006 DDG 1000............. 419,532 365,532
DDG-1000......... [-54,000]
007 DDG-51............... 2,671,415 2,671,415
008 ADVANCE 134,039 134,039
PROCUREMENT (CY).
009 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP. 1,427,049 977,049
Reduction of 1 [-450,000]
LCS.
009A ADVANCE 100,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
Program [100,000]
requirement.
AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
010 LPD-17............... 12,565 812,565
Incremental [800,000]
funding for LPD-
28.
014 ADVANCE 29,093 29,093
PROCUREMENT (CY).
015 JOINT HIGH SPEED 4,590 4,590
VESSEL.
AUXILIARIES, CRAFT
AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM
COST
016 MOORED TRAINING SHIP. 737,268 517,268
Moored Training [-220,000]
Ship.
017 ADVANCE 64,388 64,388
PROCUREMENT (CY).
018 OUTFITTING........... 546,104 546,104
019 SHIP TO SHORE 123,233 123,233
CONNECTOR.
020 LCAC SLEP............ 40,485 40,485
021 COMPLETION OF PY 1,007,285 1,007,285
SHIPBUILDING
PROGRAMS.
TOTAL 14,400,625 15,060,225
SHIPBUILDING &
CONVERSION, NAVY.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
NAVY
SHIP PROPULSION
EQUIPMENT
001 LM-2500 GAS TURBINE.. 7,822 7,822
002 ALLISON 501K GAS 2,155 2,155
TURBINE.
003 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE 22,704 15,704
(HED).
Hybrid Electric [-7,000]
Drive.
GENERATORS
004 SURFACE COMBATANT 29,120 22,120
HM&E.
Surface Combatant [-7,000]
HM&E.
NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
005 OTHER NAVIGATION 45,431 45,431
EQUIPMENT.
PERISCOPES
006 SUB PERISCOPES & 60,970 52,670
IMAGING EQUIP.
Submarine [-8,300]
Periscopes and
Imaging Equipment.
OTHER SHIPBOARD
EQUIPMENT
007 DDG MOD.............. 338,569 338,569
008 FIREFIGHTING 15,486 15,486
EQUIPMENT.
009 COMMAND AND CONTROL 2,219 2,219
SWITCHBOARD.
010 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE...... 17,928 17,928
011 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED 22,025 22,025
SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM.
012 POLLUTION CONTROL 12,607 12,607
EQUIPMENT.
013 SUBMARINE SUPPORT 16,492 16,492
EQUIPMENT.
014 VIRGINIA CLASS 74,129 74,129
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
015 LCS CLASS SUPPORT 36,206 36,206
EQUIPMENT.
016 SUBMARINE BATTERIES.. 37,352 37,352
017 LPD CLASS SUPPORT 49,095 49,095
EQUIPMENT.
018 ELECTRONIC DRY AIR... 2,996 2,996
019 STRATEGIC PLATFORM 11,558 11,558
SUPPORT EQUIP.
020 DSSP EQUIPMENT....... 5,518 5,518
022 LCAC................. 7,158 7,158
023 UNDERWATER EOD 58,783 53,783
PROGRAMS.
Underwater EOD [-5,000]
programs.
024 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 68,748 68,748
MILLION.

[[Page H4632]]

025 CHEMICAL WARFARE 2,937 2,937
DETECTORS.
026 SUBMARINE LIFE 8,385 8,385
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
REACTOR PLANT
EQUIPMENT
027 REACTOR POWER UNITS.. 298,200
CVN 73 Refueling [298,200]
and Complex
Overhaul (RCOH).
028 REACTOR COMPONENTS... 288,822 288,822
OCEAN ENGINEERING
029 DIVING AND SALVAGE 10,572 10,572
EQUIPMENT.
SMALL BOATS
030 STANDARD BOATS....... 129,784 80,784
Standard Boats... [-49,000]
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
031 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING 17,152 17,152
EQUIPMENT.
PRODUCTION FACILITIES
EQUIPMENT
032 OPERATING FORCES IPE. 39,409 39,409
OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
033 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS.. 118,129 118,129
034 LCS COMMON MISSION 37,413 37,413
MODULES EQUIPMENT.
035 LCS MCM MISSION 15,270 15,270
MODULES.
036 LCS ASW MISSION 2,729 2,729
MODULES.
037 LCS SUW MISSION 44,208 44,208
MODULES.
038 REMOTE MINEHUNTING 42,276 42,276
SYSTEM (RMS).
SHIP SONARS
040 SPQ-9B RADAR......... 28,007 28,007
041 AN/SQQ-89 SURF ASW 79,802 79,802
COMBAT SYSTEM.
042 SSN ACOUSTICS........ 165,655 165,655
043 UNDERSEA WARFARE 9,487 9,487
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
044 SONAR SWITCHES AND 11,621 11,621
TRANSDUCERS.
ASW ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
046 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC 24,221 24,221
WARFARE SYSTEM.
047 SSTD................. 12,051 12,051
048 FIXED SURVEILLANCE 170,831 170,831
SYSTEM.
049 SURTASS.............. 9,619 9,619
050 MARITIME PATROL AND 14,390 14,390
RECONNSAISANCE FORCE.
ELECTRONIC WARFARE
EQUIPMENT
051 AN/SLQ-32............ 214,582 214,582
RECONNAISSANCE
EQUIPMENT
052 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT. 124,862 124,862
053 AUTOMATED 164 164
IDENTIFICATION
SYSTEM (AIS).
SUBMARINE
SURVEILLANCE
EQUIPMENT
054 SUBMARINE SUPPORT 45,362 45,362
EQUIPMENT PROG.
OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
055 COOPERATIVE 33,939 33,939
ENGAGEMENT
CAPABILITY.
056 TRUSTED INFORMATION 324 324
SYSTEM (TIS).
057 NAVAL TACTICAL 18,192 18,192
COMMAND SUPPORT
SYSTEM (NTCSS).
058 ATDLS................ 16,768 16,768
059 NAVY COMMAND AND 5,219 5,219
CONTROL SYSTEM
(NCCS).
060 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM 42,108 42,108
REPLACEMENT.
062 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS 15,232 15,232
(SPACE).
063 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO 4,524 4,524
AND TV SERVICE.
064 STRATEGIC PLATFORM 6,382 6,382
SUPPORT EQUIP.
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
065 OTHER TRAINING 46,122 46,122
EQUIPMENT.
AVIATION ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
066 MATCALS.............. 16,999 16,999
067 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC 9,366 9,366
CONTROL.
068 AUTOMATIC CARRIER 21,357 21,357
LANDING SYSTEM.
069 NATIONAL AIR SPACE 26,639 26,639
SYSTEM.
070 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC 9,214 9,214
CONTROL SYSTEMS.
071 LANDING SYSTEMS...... 13,902 13,902
072 ID SYSTEMS........... 34,901 34,901
073 NAVAL MISSION 13,950 13,950
PLANNING SYSTEMS.
OTHER SHORE
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
074 DEPLOYABLE JOINT 1,205 1,205
COMMAND & CONTROL.
075 MARITIME INTEGRATED 3,447 3,447
BROADCAST SYSTEM.
076 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I 16,766 16,766
SYSTEMS.
077 DCGS-N............... 23,649 23,649
078 CANES................ 357,589 357,589
079 RADIAC............... 8,343 8,343
080 CANES-INTELL......... 65,015 65,015
081 GPETE................ 6,284 6,284
082 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM 4,016 4,016
TEST FACILITY.
083 EMI CONTROL 4,113 4,113
INSTRUMENTATION.
084 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 45,053 45,053
MILLION.
SHIPBOARD
COMMUNICATIONS
085 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL 14,410 14,410
COMMUNICATIONS.
086 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS 20,830 20,830
AUTOMATION.
088 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS 14,145 14,145
UNDER $5M.
SUBMARINE
COMMUNICATIONS
089 SUBMARINE BROADCAST 11,057 11,057
SUPPORT.
090 SUBMARINE 67,852 67,852
COMMUNICATION
EQUIPMENT.
SATELLITE
COMMUNICATIONS

[[Page H4633]]

091 SATELLITE 13,218 13,268
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
CVN 73 Refueling [50]
and Complex
Overhaul (RCOH).
092 NAVY MULTIBAND 272,076 272,076
TERMINAL (NMT).
SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
093 JCS COMMUNICATIONS 4,369 4,369
EQUIPMENT.
094 ELECTRICAL POWER 1,402 1,402
SYSTEMS.
CRYPTOGRAPHIC
EQUIPMENT
095 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY 110,766 110,766
PROGRAM (ISSP).
096 MIO INTEL 979 979
EXPLOITATION TEAM.
CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
097 CRYPTOLOGIC 11,502 11,502
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP.
OTHER ELECTRONIC
SUPPORT
098 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT 2,967 2,967
SONOBUOYS
100 SONOBUOYS--ALL TYPES. 182,946 182,946
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
101 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT 47,944 47,944
EQUIPMENT.
103 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT 76,683 76,683
EQUIPMENT.
106 METEOROLOGICAL 12,575 12,875
EQUIPMENT.
CVN 73 Refueling [300]
and Complex
Overhaul (RCOH).
107 DCRS/DPL............. 1,415 1,415
109 AIRBORNE MINE 23,152 23,152
COUNTERMEASURES.
114 AVIATION SUPPORT 52,555 52,555
EQUIPMENT.
SHIP GUN SYSTEM
EQUIPMENT
115 SHIP GUN SYSTEMS 5,572 5,572
EQUIPMENT.
SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS
EQUIPMENT
118 SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT 165,769 165,769
EQUIPMENT.
123 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT 61,462 61,462
EQUIPMENT.
FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
126 STRATEGIC MISSILE 229,832 229,832
SYSTEMS EQUIP.
ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
127 SSN COMBAT CONTROL 66,020 66,020
SYSTEMS.
128 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 7,559 7,559
OTHER ORDNANCE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
132 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 20,619 20,619
DISPOSAL EQUIP.
133 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 11,251 11,251
MILLION.
OTHER EXPENDABLE
ORDNANCE
137 TRAINING DEVICE MODS. 84,080 84,080
CIVIL ENGINEERING
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
138 PASSENGER CARRYING 2,282 2,282
VEHICLES.
139 GENERAL PURPOSE 547 547
TRUCKS.
140 CONSTRUCTION & 8,949 8,949
MAINTENANCE EQUIP.
141 FIRE FIGHTING 14,621 14,621
EQUIPMENT.
142 TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 957 957
143 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT. 8,187 8,187
144 POLLUTION CONTROL 2,942 2,942
EQUIPMENT.
145 ITEMS UNDER $5 17,592 17,592
MILLION.
146 PHYSICAL SECURITY 1,177 1,177
VEHICLES.
SUPPLY SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
147 MATERIALS HANDLING 10,937 10,937
EQUIPMENT.
148 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT 10,374 10,374
EQUIPMENT.
149 FIRST DESTINATION 5,668 5,668
TRANSPORTATION.
150 SPECIAL PURPOSE 90,921 90,921
SUPPLY SYSTEMS.
TRAINING DEVICES
151 TRAINING SUPPORT 22,046 22,046
EQUIPMENT.
COMMAND SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
152 COMMAND SUPPORT 24,208 24,208
EQUIPMENT.
153 EDUCATION SUPPORT 874 874
EQUIPMENT.
154 MEDICAL SUPPORT 2,634 2,634
EQUIPMENT.
156 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT 3,573 3,573
EQUIPMENT.
157 OPERATING FORCES 3,997 3,997
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT.
158 C4ISR EQUIPMENT...... 9,638 9,638
159 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT 21,001 21,001
EQUIPMENT.
160 PHYSICAL SECURITY 94,957 94,957
EQUIPMENT.
161 ENTERPRISE 87,214 87,214
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY.
OTHER
164 NEXT GENERATION 116,165 116,165
ENTERPRISE SERVICE.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
164A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 10,847 10,847
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
165 SPARES AND REPAIR 325,084 325,134
PARTS.
CVN 73 Refueling [50]
and Complex
Overhaul (RCOH).
TOTAL OTHER 5,975,828 6,198,128
PROCUREMENT,
NAVY.

PROCUREMENT, MARINE
CORPS
TRACKED COMBAT
VEHICLES
001 AAV7A1 PIP........... 16,756 16,756
002 LAV PIP.............. 77,736 77,736
ARTILLERY AND OTHER
WEAPONS
003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE 5,742 642
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
Per Marine Corps [-5,100]
excess to need.
004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT 4,532 4,532
TOWED HOWITZER.

[[Page H4634]]

005 HIGH MOBILITY 19,474 19,474
ARTILLERY ROCKET
SYSTEM.
006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT 7,250 7,250
VEHICLES UNDER $5
MILLION.
OTHER SUPPORT
007 MODIFICATION KITS.... 21,909 21,909
008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT 3,208 3,208
PROGRAM.
GUIDED MISSILES
009 GROUND BASED AIR 31,439 31,439
DEFENSE.
010 JAVELIN.............. 343 343
011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW.... 4,995 4,995
012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS 1,589 1,589
SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-
H).
OTHER SUPPORT
013 MODIFICATION KITS.... 5,134 5,134
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEMS
014 UNIT OPERATIONS 9,178 9,178
CENTER.
015 COMMON AVIATION 12,272 12,272
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEM (C.
REPAIR AND TEST
EQUIPMENT
016 REPAIR AND TEST 30,591 30,591
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
017 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM 2,385 2,385
COMMAND AND CONTROL
SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
019 ITEMS UNDER $5 4,205 4,205
MILLION (COMM &
ELEC).
020 AIR OPERATIONS C2 8,002 8,002
SYSTEMS.
RADAR + EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
021 RADAR SYSTEMS........ 19,595 19,595
022 U.................... 89,230 89,230
023 RQ-21 UAS............ 70,565 70,565
INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT
(NON-TEL)
024 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM.. 11,860 11,860
025 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 44,340 44,340
EQUIPMENT.
028 RQ-11 UAV............ 2,737 2,737
030 DCGS-MC.............. 20,620 20,620
OTHER COMM/ELEC
EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
031 NIGHT VISION 9,798 9,798
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT (NON-
TEL)
032 NEXT GENERATION 2,073 2,073
ENTERPRISE NETWORK
(NGEN).
033 COMMON COMPUTER 33,570 33,570
RESOURCES.
034 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS. 38,186 38,186
035 RADIO SYSTEMS........ 64,494 64,494
036 COMM SWITCHING & 72,956 72,956
CONTROL SYSTEMS.
037 COMM & ELEC 43,317 43,317
INFRASTRUCTURE
SUPPORT.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
037A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 2,498 2,498
ADMINISTRATIVE
VEHICLES
038 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER 332 332
VEHICLES.
039 COMMERCIAL CARGO 11,035 11,035
VEHICLES.
TACTICAL VEHICLES
040 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV 57,255 37,255
(MYP).
Early to need.... [-20,000]
041 MOTOR TRANSPORT 938 938
MODIFICATIONS.
044 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL 7,500 7,500
VEHICLE.
045 FAMILY OF TACTICAL 10,179 10,179
TRAILERS.
OTHER SUPPORT
046 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 11,023 11,023
MILLION.
ENGINEER AND OTHER
EQUIPMENT
047 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 994 994
EQUIP ASSORT.
048 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT 1,256 1,256
049 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS 3,750 3,750
050 POWER EQUIPMENT 8,985 8,985
ASSORTED.
051 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT 4,418 4,418
EQUIPMENT.
052 EOD SYSTEMS.......... 6,528 6,528
MATERIALS HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
053 PHYSICAL SECURITY 26,510 26,510
EQUIPMENT.
054 GARRISON MOBILE 1,910 1,910
ENGINEER EQUIPMENT
(GMEE).
055 MATERIAL HANDLING 8,807 8,807
EQUIP.
056 FIRST DESTINATION 128 128
TRANSPORTATION.
GENERAL PROPERTY
058 TRAINING DEVICES..... 3,412 3,412
059 CONTAINER FAMILY..... 1,662 1,662
060 FAMILY OF 3,669 3,669
CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT.
OTHER SUPPORT
062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 4,272 4,272
MILLION.
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
063 SPARES AND REPAIR 16,210 16,210
PARTS.
TOTAL 983,352 958,252
PROCUREMENT,
MARINE CORPS.

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
TACTICAL FORCES
001 F-35................. 3,553,046 3,553,046
002 ADVANCE 291,880 291,880
PROCUREMENT (CY).
TACTICAL AIRLIFT
003 KC-46A TANKER........ 1,582,685 1,356,585
LRIP 1 Ramp Rate. [-226,100]

[[Page H4635]]

OTHER AIRLIFT
004 C-130J............... 482,396 482,396
005 ADVANCE 140,000 140,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
006 HC-130J.............. 332,024 332,024
007 ADVANCE 50,000 50,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
008 MC-130J.............. 190,971 190,971
009 ADVANCE 80,000 80,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
MISSION SUPPORT
AIRCRAFT
012 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C. 2,562 2,562
OTHER AIRCRAFT
013 TARGET DRONES........ 98,576 98,576
016 RQ-4................. 54,475 44,475
MPRTIP Sensor [-10,000]
Trainer reduction.
017 AC-130J.............. 1 1
018 MQ-9................. 240,218 360,218
Program increase. [120,000]
STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
020 B-2A................. 23,865 23,865
021 B-1B................. 140,252 140,252
022 B-52................. 180,148 180,148
023 LARGE AIRCRAFT 13,159 13,159
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURES.
TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
025 F-15................. 387,314 387,314
026 F-16................. 12,336 12,336
027 F-22A................ 180,207 180,207
028 F-35 MODIFICATIONS... 187,646 187,646
029 ADVANCE 28,500 28,500
PROCUREMENT (CY).
AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
030 C-5.................. 14,731 14,731
031 C-5M................. 331,466 281,466
Program execution [-50,000]
delay.
033 C-17A................ 127,494 127,494
034 C-21................. 264 264
035 C-32A................ 8,767 8,767
036 C-37A................ 18,457 18,457
TRAINER AIRCRAFT
038 GLIDER MODS.......... 132 132
039 T-6.................. 14,486 14,486
040 T-1.................. 7,650 7,650
041 T-38................. 34,845 34,845
OTHER AIRCRAFT
044 KC-10A (ATCA)........ 34,313 34,313
045 C-12................. 1,960 1,960
048 VC-25A MOD........... 1,072 1,072
049 C-40................. 7,292 7,292
050 C-130................ 35,869 109,671
8.33kHz radios... [-7,447]
C-130 8-Bladed [30,000]
Propeller upgrade.
C-130 AMP........ [35,800]
CVR/DVR.......... [-7,151]
T-56 3.5 Engine [22,600]
Mod.
051 C-130J MODS.......... 7,919 7,919
052 C-135................ 63,568 63,568
053 COMPASS CALL MODS.... 57,828 57,828
054 RC-135............... 152,746 152,746
055 E-3.................. 16,491 29,348
Program increase. [12,857]
056 E-4.................. 22,341 22,341
058 AIRBORNE WARNING AND 160,284 160,284
CONTROL SYSTEM.
059 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE- 32,026 32,026
OF-SIGHT TERMINALS.
060 H-1.................. 8,237 8,237
061 H-60................. 60,110 60,110
062 RQ-4 MODS............ 21,354 21,354
063 HC/MC-130 1,902 1,902
MODIFICATIONS.
064 OTHER AIRCRAFT....... 32,106 32,106
065 MQ-1 MODS............ 4,755 1,555
Program reduction [-3,200]
066 MQ-9 MODS............ 155,445 155,445
069 CV-22 MODS........... 74,874 74,874
069A EJECTION SEAT 7,000
RELIABILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
Initial aircraft [7,000]
installation.
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
070 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR 466,562 424,532
PARTS.
Program decrease. [-42,030]
COMMON SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
071 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT 22,470 22,470
SUPPORT EQUIP.
POST PRODUCTION
SUPPORT
074 B-2A................. 44,793 44,793
075 B-52................. 5,249 5,249
077 C-17A................ 20,110 15,110
Program execution [-5,000]
delay.
078 CV-22 POST PRODUCTION 16,931 16,931
SUPPORT.

[[Page H4636]]

080 C-135................ 4,414 4,414
081 F-15................. 1,122 1,122
082 F-16................. 10,994 10,994
083 F-22A................ 5,929 5,929
084 OTHER AIRCRAFT....... 27 27
INDUSTRIAL
PREPAREDNESS
085 INDUSTRIAL 21,363 21,363
RESPONSIVENESS.
WAR CONSUMABLES
086 WAR CONSUMABLES...... 82,906 82,906
OTHER PRODUCTION
CHARGES
087 OTHER PRODUCTION 1,007,276 1,007,276
CHARGES.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
087A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 69,380 69,380
TOTAL AIRCRAFT 11,542,571 11,419,900
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

MISSILE PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
MISSILE REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT--BALLISTIC
001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT 80,187 80,187
EQ-BALLISTIC.
TACTICAL
003 JOINT AIR-SURFACE 337,438 337,438
STANDOFF MISSILE.
004 SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X).. 132,995 132,995
005 AMRAAM............... 329,600 329,600
006 PREDATOR HELLFIRE 33,878 33,878
MISSILE.
007 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB.. 70,578 70,578
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
008 INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/ 749 749
POL PREVENTION.
CLASS IV
009 MM III MODIFICATIONS. 28,477 28,477
010 AGM-65D MAVERICK..... 276 276
011 AGM-88A HARM......... 297 297
012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE 16,083 16,083
MISSILE (ALCM).
013 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB.. 6,924 6,924
MISSILE SPARES AND
REPAIR PARTS
014 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR 87,366 87,366
PARTS.
SPACE PROGRAMS
015 ADVANCED EHF......... 298,890 298,890
016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER 38,971 35,971
SATELLITES(SPACE).
Unjustified [-3,000]
growth.
017 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT 235,397 235,397
018 ADVANCE 57,000 57,000
PROCUREMENT (CY).
019 SPACEBORNE EQUIP 16,201 16,201
(COMSEC).
020 GLOBAL POSITIONING 52,090 52,090
(SPACE).
021 DEF METEOROLOGICAL 87,000 87,000
SAT PROG(SPACE).
022 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE 750,143 750,143
LAUNCH VEH
(INFRAST.).
023 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE 630,903 765,903
LAUNCH VEH(SPACE).
DMSP 20 launch/ [135,000]
Additional
competition
launch.
024 SBIR HIGH (SPACE).... 450,884 450,884
SPECIAL PROGRAMS
028 SPECIAL UPDATE 60,179 60,179
PROGRAMS.
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
028A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 888,000 888,000
TOTAL MISSILE 4,690,506 4,822,506
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE
ROCKETS
001 ROCKETS.............. 4,696 4,696
CARTRIDGES
002 CARTRIDGES........... 133,271 133,271
BOMBS
003 PRACTICE BOMBS....... 31,998 31,998
004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS 148,614 148,614
005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK 101,400 101,400
MUNITION.
OTHER ITEMS
006 CAD/PAD.............. 29,989 29,989
007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE 6,925 6,925
DISPOSAL (EOD).
008 SPARES AND REPAIR 494 494
PARTS.
009 MODIFICATIONS........ 1,610 1,610
010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 4,237 4,237
MILLION.
FLARES
011 FLARES............... 86,101 86,101
FUZES
012 FUZES................ 103,417 103,417
SMALL ARMS
013 SMALL ARMS........... 24,648 24,648
TOTAL 677,400 677,400
PROCUREMENT OF
AMMUNITION, AIR
FORCE.

OTHER PROCUREMENT,
AIR FORCE
PASSENGER CARRYING
VEHICLES
001 PASSENGER CARRYING 6,528 2,528
VEHICLES.
Program reduction [-4,000]
CARGO AND UTILITY
VEHICLES
002 MEDIUM TACTICAL 7,639 2,639
VEHICLE.

[[Page H4637]]

Program reduction [-5,000]
003 CAP VEHICLES......... 961 961
004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 11,027 5,027
MILLION.
Program reduction [-6,000]
SPECIAL PURPOSE
VEHICLES
005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL 4,447 4,447
VEHICLES.
006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 693 693
MILLION.
FIRE FIGHTING
EQUIPMENT
007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH 10,152 10,152
RESCUE VEHICLES.
MATERIALS HANDLING
EQUIPMENT
008 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 15,108 5,108
MILLION.
Program reduction [-10,000]
BASE MAINTENANCE
SUPPORT
009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & 10,212 6,212
CLEANING EQUIP.
Program reduction [-4,000]
010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 57,049 32,049
MILLION.
Program reduction [-25,000]
COMM SECURITY
EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
011 COMSEC EQUIPMENT..... 106,182 106,182
012 MODIFICATIONS 1,363 1,363
(COMSEC).
INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
013 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING 2,832 2,832
EQUIPMENT.
014 INTELLIGENCE COMM 32,329 32,329
EQUIPMENT.
016 MISSION PLANNING 15,649 15,649
SYSTEMS.
ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
017 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & 42,200 42,200
LANDING SYS.
018 NATIONAL AIRSPACE 6,333 6,333
SYSTEM.
019 BATTLE CONTROL 2,708 2,708
SYSTEM--FIXED.
020 THEATER AIR CONTROL 50,033 40,033
SYS IMPROVEMENTS.
Program reduction [-10,000]
021 WEATHER OBSERVATION 16,348 16,348
FORECAST.
022 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND 139,984 139,984
CONTROL.
023 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN 20,101 20,101
COMPLEX.
026 INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN 9,060 9,060
& ANALY NETWORK
(ISPAN).
SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS
PROJECTS
027 GENERAL INFORMATION 39,100 39,100
TECHNOLOGY.
028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & 19,010 19,010
CONTROL SYS.
029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND 11,462 11,462
CONTROL.
030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL 37,426 37,426
SECURITY SYSTEM.
031 COMBAT TRAINING 26,634 26,634
RANGES.
032 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL 1,289 1,289
EMERGENCY COMM N.
033 C3 COUNTERMEASURES... 11,508 11,508
034 GCSS-AF FOS.......... 3,670 3,670
035 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE 15,298 15,298
ACCOUNTING AND MGMT
SYSTEM.
036 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 9,565 9,565
SYSTEM.
037 AIR & SPACE 25,772 25,772
OPERATIONS CTR-WPN
SYS.
AIR FORCE
COMMUNICATIONS
038 INFORMATION TRANSPORT 81,286 112,586
SYSTEMS.
Air Force [31,300]
requested program
transfer from
AFNET.
039 AFNET................ 122,228 90,928
Air Force [-31,300]
requested program
transfer to BITI.
041 USCENTCOM............ 16,342 16,342
SPACE PROGRAMS
042 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE- 60,230 60,230
OF-SIGHT TERMINALS.
043 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR 26,100 26,100
PGM SPACE.
044 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE.... 2,075 2,075
045 NUDET DETECTION SYS 4,656 4,656
SPACE.
046 AF SATELLITE CONTROL 54,630 54,630
NETWORK SPACE.
047 SPACELIFT RANGE 69,713 69,713
SYSTEM SPACE.
048 MILSATCOM SPACE...... 41,355 41,355
049 SPACE MODS SPACE..... 31,722 31,722
050 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM.. 61,603 61,603
ORGANIZATION AND BASE
051 TACTICAL C-E 50,335 50,335
EQUIPMENT.
053 RADIO EQUIPMENT...... 14,846 14,846
054 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL 3,635 3,635
EQUIPMENT.
055 BASE COMM 79,607 79,607
INFRASTRUCTURE.
MODIFICATIONS
056 COMM ELECT MODS...... 105,398 105,398
PERSONAL SAFETY &
RESCUE EQUIP
057 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES. 12,577 12,577
058 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 31,209 31,209
MILLION.
DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS
HANDLING EQ
059 MECHANIZED MATERIAL 7,670 7,670
HANDLING EQUIP.
BASE SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT
060 BASE PROCURED 14,125 14,125
EQUIPMENT.
061 CONTINGENCY 16,744 16,744
OPERATIONS.
062 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL 2,495 2,495
INVESTMENT.
063 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT... 10,573 10,573
064 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 5,462 5,462
MILLION.
SPECIAL SUPPORT
PROJECTS
066 DARP RC135........... 24,710 24,710

[[Page H4638]]

067 DCGS-AF.............. 206,743 206,743
069 SPECIAL UPDATE 537,370 537,370
PROGRAM.
070 DEFENSE SPACE 77,898 77,898
RECONNAISSANCE PROG..
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
070A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 13,990,196 13,990,196
SPARES AND REPAIR
PARTS
072 SPARES AND REPAIR 32,813 32,813
PARTS.
TOTAL OTHER 16,566,018 16,502,018
PROCUREMENT, AIR
FORCE.

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-
WIDE
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
001 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 1,594 1,594
MILLION.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 4,325 4,325
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
003 PERSONNEL 17,268 17,268
ADMINISTRATION.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
008 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 10,491 10,491
SECURITY.
010 TELEPORT PROGRAM..... 80,622 80,622
011 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 14,147 14,147
MILLION.
012 NET CENTRIC 1,921 1,921
ENTERPRISE SERVICES
(NCES).
013 DEFENSE INFORMATION 80,144 80,144
SYSTEM NETWORK.
015 CYBER SECURITY 8,755 8,755
INITIATIVE.
016 WHITE HOUSE 33,737 33,737
COMMUNICATION AGENCY.
017 SENIOR LEADERSHIP 32,544 32,544
ENTERPRISE.
018 JOINT INFORMATION 13,300 13,300
ENVIRONMENT.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
020 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 7,436 7,436
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DMACT
021 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 11,640 11,640
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DODEA
022 AUTOMATION/ 1,269 1,269
EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT
& LOGISTICS.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
024 VEHICLES............. 1,500 1,500
025 MAJOR EQUIPMENT...... 1,039 1,039
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
DEFENSE THREAT
REDUCTION AGENCY
026 VEHICLES............. 50 50
027 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 7,639 7,639
MAJOR EQUIPMENT,
MISSILE DEFENSE
AGENCY
028 ADVANCE 68,880 68,880
PROCUREMENT (CY).
029 THAAD................ 464,424 464,424
030 AEGIS BMD............ 435,430 435,430
031 BMDS AN/TPY-2 RADARS. 48,140 48,140
032 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE 225,774 225,774
III.
034 IRON DOME............ 175,972 351,972
Program increase [176,000]
for Iron Dome.
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
041 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,448 3,448
SECURITY PROGRAM
(ISSP).
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
042 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD. 43,708 43,708
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
044 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS. 10,783 10,783
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
046 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS. 29,599 29,599
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
046A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS.. 540,894 540,894
AVIATION PROGRAMS
047 MC-12................ 40,500 40,500
048 ROTARY WING UPGRADES 112,226 112,226
AND SUSTAINMENT.
049 MH-60 MODERNIZATION 3,021 3,021
PROGRAM.
050 NON-STANDARD AVIATION 48,200 48,200
052 MH-47 CHINOOK........ 22,230 22,230
053 RQ-11 UNMANNED AERIAL 6,397 6,397
VEHICLE.
054 CV-22 MODIFICATION... 25,578 25,578
056 MQ-9 UNMANNED AERIAL 15,651 15,651
VEHICLE.
057 STUASL0.............. 1,500 1,500
058 PRECISION STRIKE 145,929 145,929
PACKAGE.
059 AC/MC-130J........... 65,130 65,130
061 C-130 MODIFICATIONS.. 39,563 39,563
SHIPBUILDING
063 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS... 25,459 25,459
AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
065 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M.. 144,336 144,336
OTHER PROCUREMENT
PROGRAMS
068 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS. 81,001 81,001
070 DISTRIBUTED COMMON 17,323 13,423
GROUND/SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
Reduction of PED [-3,900]
Ground Systems.
071 OTHER ITEMS <$5M..... 84,852 84,852
072 COMBATANT CRAFT 51,937 51,937
SYSTEMS.
074 SPECIAL PROGRAMS..... 31,017 31,017
075 TACTICAL VEHICLES.... 63,134 63,134
076 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M. 192,448 192,448

[[Page H4639]]

078 COMBAT MISSION 19,984 19,984
REQUIREMENTS.
081 GLOBAL VIDEO 5,044 5,044
SURVEILLANCE
ACTIVITIES.
082 OPERATIONAL 38,126 38,126
ENHANCEMENTS
INTELLIGENCE.
088 OPERATIONAL 243,849 243,849
ENHANCEMENTS.
CBDP
095 CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL 170,137 170,137
SITUATIONAL
AWARENESS.
096 CB PROTECTION & 150,392 150,392
HAZARD MITIGATION.
TOTAL 4,221,437 4,393,537
PROCUREMENT,
DEFENSE-WIDE.

JOINT URGENT
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND
001 JOINT URGENT 20,000 0
OPERATIONAL NEEDS
FUND.
Unjustified [-20,000]
request.
TOTAL JOINT 20,000 0
URGENT
OPERATIONAL
NEEDS FUND.

PRIOR YEAR
RESCISSIONS
001 PRIOR YEAR -265,685 0
RESCISSIONS.
Denied Prior Year [265,685]
Rescission
request.
TOTAL PRIOR YEAR -265,685 0
RESCISSIONS.

UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL
PROVISIONS
001 UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL -265,685
PROVISIONS.
Undistributed [-265,685]
FY15 reduction.
TOTAL -265,685
UNDISTRIBUTED
GENERAL
PROVISIONS.

TOTAL 89,508,034 90,983,703
PROCUREMENT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLII--RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION (In Thousands of
Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program FY 2015 House
Line Element Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.............. RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
ARMY
.............. BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601101A IN-HOUSE 13,464 13,464
LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH.
002 0601102A DEFENSE 238,167 238,167
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
003 0601103A UNIVERSITY 69,808 69,808
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND 102,737 102,737
INDUSTRY
RESEARCH
CENTERS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 424,176 424,176
BASIC
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. APPLIED
RESEARCH
005 0602105A MATERIALS 28,006 28,006
TECHNOLOGY.
006 0602120A SENSORS AND 33,515 33,515
ELECTRONIC
SURVIVABILITY.
007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP.... 16,358 16,358
008 0602211A AVIATION 63,433 63,433
TECHNOLOGY.
009 0602270A ELECTRONIC 18,502 18,502
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
010 0602303A MISSILE 46,194 46,194
TECHNOLOGY.
011 0602307A ADVANCED 28,528 28,528
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
012 0602308A ADVANCED 27,435 27,435
CONCEPTS AND
SIMULATION.
013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE 72,883 72,883
AND AUTOMOTIVE
TECHNOLOGY.
014 0602618A BALLISTICS 85,597 85,597
TECHNOLOGY.
015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE 3,971 3,971
AND EQUIPMENT
DEFEATING
TECHNOLOGY.
016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE 6,853 6,853
SMALL ARMS
PROGRAM.
017 0602624A WEAPONS AND 38,069 38,069
MUNITIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND 56,435 56,435
ELECTRONIC
DEVICES.
019 0602709A NIGHT VISION 38,445 38,445
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0602712A COUNTERMINE 25,939 25,939
SYSTEMS.
021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS 23,783 23,783
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY.
022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL 15,659 15,659
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0602782A COMMAND, 33,817 33,817
CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0602783A COMPUTER AND 10,764 10,764
SOFTWARE
TECHNOLOGY.
025 0602784A MILITARY 63,311 63,311
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY.
026 0602785A MANPOWER/ 23,295 23,295
PERSONNEL/
TRAINING
TECHNOLOGY.
027 0602786A WARFIGHTER 25,751 28,330
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. Joint [2,579]
Service
Combat
Feeding
Technology.
028 0602787A MEDICAL 76,068 76,068
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. SUBTOTAL 862,611 865,190
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
029 0603001A WARFIGHTER 65,139 65,813
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. Joint [674]
Service
Combat
Feeding
Tech Demo.
030 0603002A MEDICAL 67,291 67,291
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
031 0603003A AVIATION 88,990 88,990
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
032 0603004A WEAPONS AND 57,931 57,931
MUNITIONS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE 110,031 110,031
AND AUTOMOTIVE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603006A SPACE 6,883 6,883
APPLICATION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
035 0603007A MANPOWER, 13,580 13,580
PERSONNEL AND
TRAINING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.

[[Page H4640]]

036 0603008A ELECTRONIC 44,871 44,871
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE... 7,492 7,492
038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION 16,749 16,749
TRAINING &
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS.
039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE... 14,483 14,483
041 0603125A COMBATING 24,270 24,270
TERRORISM--TEC
HNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL... 3,440 3,440
043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS... 2,406 2,406
044 0603270A ELECTRONIC 26,057 26,057
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
045 0603313A MISSILE AND 44,957 44,957
ROCKET
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE... 11,105 11,105
047 0603461A HIGH 181,609 181,609
PERFORMANCE
COMPUTING
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
048 0603606A LANDMINE 13,074 13,074
WARFARE AND
BARRIER
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE 7,321 7,321
SMALL ARMS
PROGRAM.
050 0603710A NIGHT VISION 44,138 44,138
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL 9,197 9,197
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
052 0603734A MILITARY 17,613 17,613
ENGINEERING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
053 0603772A ADVANCED 39,164 39,164
TACTICAL
COMPUTER
SCIENCE AND
SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. SUBTOTAL 917,791 918,465
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
054 0603305A ARMY MISSLE 12,797 12,797
DEFENSE
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
055 0603308A ARMY SPACE 13,999 13,999
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
058 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM 29,334 29,334
CALIBER
AMMUNITION.
060 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT 9,602 11,189
AND
SURVIVABILITY.
.............. Food [1,587]
Advanced
Development.
061 0603766A TACTICAL 8,953 8,953
ELECTRONIC
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM--ADV
DEV.
062 0603774A NIGHT VISION 3,052 3,052
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
063 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL 7,830 7,830
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY--DE
M/VAL.
065 0603790A NATO RESEARCH 2,954 2,954
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
067 0603804A LOGISTICS AND 13,386 13,386
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT--ADV
DEV.
069 0603807A MEDICAL 23,659 23,659
SYSTEMS--ADV
DEV.
070 0603827A SOLDIER 6,830 9,830
SYSTEMS--ADVAN
CED
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. Army [3,000]
requested
realignment
-Caliber
Config
Study.
072 0604100A ANALYSIS OF 9,913 9,913
ALTERNATIVES.
073 0604115A TECHNOLOGY 74,740 74,740
MATURATION
INITIATIVES.
074 0604120A ASSURED 9,930 9,930
POSITIONING,
NAVIGATION AND
TIMING (PNT).
076 0604319A INDIRECT FIRE 96,177 71,177
PROTECTION
CAPABILITY
INCREMENT 2-
INTERCEPT
(IFPC2).
.............. Schedule [-25,000]
delay.
.............. SUBTOTAL 323,156 302,743
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
..............
.............. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
079 0604201A AIRCRAFT 37,246 37,246
AVIONICS.
081 0604270A ELECTRONIC 6,002 6,002
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
082 0604280A JOINT TACTICAL 9,832 9,832
RADIO.
083 0604290A MID-TIER 9,730 9,730
NETWORKING
VEHICULAR
RADIO (MNVR).
084 0604321A ALL SOURCE 5,532 5,532
ANALYSIS
SYSTEM.
085 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE... 19,929 19,929
086 0604601A INFANTRY 27,884 34,586
SUPPORT
WEAPONS.
.............. Army [6,702]
requested
realignment.
087 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL 210 210
VEHICLES.
088 0604611A JAVELIN........ 4,166 4,166
089 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY 12,913 12,913
TACTICAL
VEHICLES.
090 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC 16,764 16,764
CONTROL.
091 0604641A TACTICAL 6,770 6,770
UNMANNED
GROUND VEHICLE
(TUGV).
092 0604710A NIGHT VISION 65,333 65,333
SYSTEMS--ENG
DEV.
093 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, 1,335 1,897
CLOTHING, AND
EQUIPMENT.
.............. Military [562]
Subsistence
Systems.
094 0604715A NON-SYSTEM 8,945 8,945
TRAINING
DEVICES--ENG
DEV.
096 0604741A AIR DEFENSE 15,906 15,906
COMMAND,
CONTROL AND
INTELLIGENCE--
ENG DEV.
097 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE 4,394 4,394
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
098 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST 11,084 11,084
EQUIPMENT
DEVELOPMENT.
099 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE 10,027 10,027
INTERACTIVE
SIMULATIONS
(DIS)--ENG DEV.
100 0604780A COMBINED ARMS 42,430 42,430
TACTICAL
TRAINER (CATT)
CORE.
101 0604798A BRIGADE 105,279 105,279
ANALYSIS,
INTEGRATION
AND EVALUATION.
102 0604802A WEAPONS AND 15,006 15,006
MUNITIONS--ENG
DEV.
103 0604804A LOGISTICS AND 24,581 24,581
ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT--ENG
DEV.
104 0604805A COMMAND, 4,433 4,433
CONTROL,
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS--ENG
DEV.
105 0604807A MEDICAL 30,397 30,397
MATERIEL/
MEDICAL
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
EQUIPMENT--ENG
DEV.
106 0604808A LANDMINE 57,705 57,705
WARFARE/
BARRIER--ENG
DEV.
108 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL 29,683 29,683
COMMAND &
CONTROL
HARDWARE &
SOFTWARE.
109 0604820A RADAR 5,224 5,224
DEVELOPMENT.
111 0604823A FIREFINDER..... 37,492 37,492
112 0604827A SOLDIER 6,157 6,157
SYSTEMS--WARRI
OR DEM/VAL.
113 0604854A ARTILLERY 1,912 1,912
SYSTEMS--EMD.
116 0605013A INFORMATION 69,761 69,761
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
117 0605018A INTEGRATED 138,465 138,465
PERSONNEL AND
PAY SYSTEM-
ARMY (IPPS-A).
118 0605028A ARMORED MULTI- 92,353 92,353
PURPOSE
VEHICLE (AMPV).
119 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL 8,440 8,440
NETWORK CENTER
(JTNC).
120 0605031A JOINT TACTICAL 17,999 17,999
NETWORK (JTN).
121 0605035A COMMON INFRARED 145,409 145,409
COUNTERMEASURE
S (CIRCM).
122 0605350A WIN-T INCREMENT 113,210 113,210
3--FULL
NETWORKING.
123 0605380A AMF JOINT 6,882 6,882
TACTICAL RADIO
SYSTEM (JTRS).

[[Page H4641]]

124 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO- 83,838 83,838
GROUND MISSILE
(JAGM).
125 0605456A PAC-3/MSE 35,009 35,009
MISSILE.
126 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED 142,584 142,584
AIR AND
MISSILE
DEFENSE
(AIAMD).
127 0605625A MANNED GROUND 49,160 49,160
VEHICLE.
128 0605626A AERIAL COMMON 17,748 17,748
SENSOR.
129 0605766A NATIONAL 15,212 15,212
CAPABILITIES
INTEGRATION
(MIP).
130 0605812A JOINT LIGHT 45,718 45,718
TACTICAL
VEHICLE (JLTV)
ENGINEERING
AND
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT PH.
131 0605830A AVIATION GROUND 10,041 10,041
SUPPORT
EQUIPMENT.
132 0210609A PALADIN 83,300 83,300
INTEGRATED
MANAGEMENT
(PIM).
133 0303032A TROJAN--RH12... 983 983
134 0304270A ELECTRONIC 8,961 8,961
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,719,374 1,726,638
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
..............
.............. RDT&E
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
135 0604256A THREAT 18,062 18,062
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
136 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS 10,040 10,040
DEVELOPMENT.
137 0604759A MAJOR T&E 60,317 60,317
INVESTMENT.
138 0605103A RAND ARROYO 20,612 20,612
CENTER.
139 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN 176,041 176,041
ATOLL.
140 0605326A CONCEPTS 19,439 19,439
EXPERIMENTATIO
N PROGRAM.
142 0605601A ARMY TEST 275,025 275,025
RANGES AND
FACILITIES.
143 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL 45,596 45,596
TEST
INSTRUMENTATIO
N AND TARGETS.
144 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/ 33,295 33,295
LETHALITY
ANALYSIS.
145 0605606A AIRCRAFT 4,700 4,700
CERTIFICATION.
146 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL 6,413 6,413
SUPPORT TO
RDT&E
ACTIVITIES.
147 0605706A MATERIEL 20,746 20,746
SYSTEMS
ANALYSIS.
148 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF 7,015 7,015
FOREIGN ITEMS.
149 0605712A SUPPORT OF 49,221 49,221
OPERATIONAL
TESTING.
150 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION 55,039 55,039
CENTER.
151 0605718A ARMY MODELING & 1,125 1,125
SIM X-CMD
COLLABORATION
& INTEG.
152 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE 64,169 64,169
ACTIVITIES.
153 0605803A TECHNICAL 32,319 32,319
INFORMATION
ACTIVITIES.
154 0605805A MUNITIONS 49,052 49,052
STANDARDIZATIO
N,
EFFECTIVENESS
AND SAFETY.
155 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL 2,612 2,612
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY
MGMT SUPPORT.
156 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ-- 49,592 49,592
R&D.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,000,430 1,000,430
RDT&E
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
158 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT 17,112 17,112
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
159 0607141A LOGISTICS 3,654 3,654
AUTOMATION.
160 0607664A BIOMETRIC 1,332 1,332
ENABLING
CAPABILITY
(BEC).
161 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT 152,991 152,991
IMPROVEMENT.
162 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT 54,076 29,076
PROJECT OFFICE.
.............. Unobligated [-25,000]
balances.
163 0203726A ADV FIELD 22,374 22,374
ARTILLERY
TACTICAL DATA
SYSTEM.
164 0203728A JOINT AUTOMATED 24,371 24,371
DEEP OPERATION
COORDINATION
SYSTEM
(JADOCS).
165 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE 295,177 321,177
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
.............. Stryker ECP [26,000]
risk
mitigation.
166 0203740A MANEUVER 45,092 45,092
CONTROL SYSTEM.
167 0203744A AIRCRAFT 264,887 264,887
MODIFICATIONS/
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
168 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE 381 381
COMPONENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
169 0203758A DIGITIZATION... 10,912 10,912
170 0203801A MISSILE/AIR 5,115 5,115
DEFENSE
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
171 0203802A OTHER MISSILE 49,848 44,848
PRODUCT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS.
.............. Contract [-5,000]
delay for
ATACMS.
172 0203808A TRACTOR CARD... 22,691 22,691
173 0205402A INTEGRATED BASE 4,364 4,364
DEFENSE--OPERA
TIONAL SYSTEM
DEV.
174 0205410A MATERIALS 834 834
HANDLING
EQUIPMENT.
175 0205412A ENVIRONMENTAL 280 280
QUALITY
TECHNOLOGY--OP
ERATIONAL
SYSTEM DEV.
176 0205456A LOWER TIER AIR 78,758 78,758
AND MISSILE
DEFENSE (AMD)
SYSTEM.
177 0205778A GUIDED MULTIPLE- 45,377 45,377
LAUNCH ROCKET
SYSTEM (GMLRS).
178 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL 10,209 10,209
GROUND SYSTEM.
181 0303028A SECURITY AND 12,525 12,525
INTELLIGENCE
ACTIVITIES.
182 0303140A INFORMATION 14,175 14,175
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
183 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT 4,527 4,527
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
184 0303142A SATCOM GROUND 11,011 11,011
ENVIRONMENT
(SPACE).
185 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL 2,151 2,151
COMMAND AND
CONTROL SYSTEM.
187 0305204A TACTICAL 22,870 22,870
UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLES.
188 0305208A DISTRIBUTED 20,155 20,155
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
189 0305219A MQ-1C GRAY 46,472 46,472
EAGLE UAS.
191 0305233A RQ-7 UAV....... 16,389 16,389
192 0307665A BIOMETRICS 1,974 1,974
ENABLED
INTELLIGENCE.
193 0310349A WIN-T INCREMENT 3,249 3,249
2--INITIAL
NETWORKING.
194 0708045A END ITEM 76,225 76,225
INDUSTRIAL
PREPAREDNESS
ACTIVITIES.
194A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 4,802 4,802
PROGRAMS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,346,360 1,342,360
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 6,593,898 6,580,002
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, ARMY.
..............
.............. RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
NAVY
.............. BASIC RESEARCH

[[Page H4642]]

001 0601103N UNIVERSITY 113,908 118,908
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
.............. DURIP [5,000]
program
increase.
002 0601152N IN-HOUSE 18,734 18,734
LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT
RESEARCH.
003 0601153N DEFENSE 443,697 443,697
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
.............. SUBTOTAL 576,339 581,339
BASIC
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. APPLIED
RESEARCH
004 0602114N POWER 95,753 95,753
PROJECTION
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
005 0602123N FORCE 139,496 139,496
PROTECTION
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
006 0602131M MARINE CORPS 45,831 45,831
LANDING FORCE
TECHNOLOGY.
007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE 43,541 43,541
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
008 0602236N WARFIGHTER 46,923 46,923
SUSTAINMENT
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC 107,872 107,872
SYSTEMS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
010 0602435N OCEAN 45,388 65,388
WARFIGHTING
ENVIRONMENT
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
.............. Service [20,000]
Life
extension
for the
AGOR ships.
011 0602651M JOINT NON- 5,887 5,887
LETHAL WEAPONS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
012 0602747N UNDERSEA 86,880 86,880
WARFARE
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL 170,786 170,786
CAPABILITIES
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
014 0602782N MINE AND 32,526 32,526
EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
.............. SUBTOTAL 820,883 840,883
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
015 0603114N POWER 37,734 37,734
PROJECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
016 0603123N FORCE 25,831 25,831
PROTECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
017 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC 64,623 64,623
SYSTEMS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
018 0603640M USMC ADVANCED 128,397 128,397
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATION
(ATD).
019 0603651M JOINT NON- 11,506 11,506
LETHAL WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
020 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL 256,144 256,144
CAPABILITIES
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
021 0603729N WARFIGHTER 4,838 4,838
PROTECTION
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
022 0603747N UNDERSEA 9,985 9,985
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0603758N NAVY 53,956 53,956
WARFIGHTING
EXPERIMENTS
AND
DEMONSTRATIONS.
024 0603782N MINE AND 2,000 2,000
EXPEDITIONARY
WARFARE
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. SUBTOTAL 595,014 595,014
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
025 0603207N AIR/OCEAN 40,429 40,429
TACTICAL
APPLICATIONS.
026 0603216N AVIATION 4,325 4,325
SURVIVABILITY.
027 0603237N DEPLOYABLE 2,991 2,991
JOINT COMMAND
AND CONTROL.
028 0603251N AIRCRAFT 12,651 12,651
SYSTEMS.
029 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS 7,782 7,782
DEVELOPMENT.
030 0603261N TACTICAL 5,275 5,275
AIRBORNE
RECONNAISSANCE.
031 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT 1,646 1,646
SYSTEMS
TECHNOLOGY.
032 0603502N SURFACE AND 100,349 100,349
SHALLOW WATER
MINE
COUNTERMEASURE
S.
033 0603506N SURFACE SHIP 52,781 52,781
TORPEDO
DEFENSE.
034 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS 5,959 5,959
DEVELOPMENT.
035 0603525N PILOT FISH..... 148,865 148,865
036 0603527N RETRACT LARCH.. 25,365 25,365
037 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER 80,477 80,477
038 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL 669 669
CONTROL.
039 0603553N SURFACE ASW.... 1,060 1,060
040 0603561N ADVANCED 70,551 70,551
SUBMARINE
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
041 0603562N SUBMARINE 8,044 8,044
TACTICAL
WARFARE
SYSTEMS.
042 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT 17,864 17,864
ADVANCED
DESIGN.
043 0603564N SHIP 23,716 23,716
PRELIMINARY
DESIGN &
FEASIBILITY
STUDIES.
044 0603570N ADVANCED 499,961 499,961
NUCLEAR POWER
SYSTEMS.
045 0603573N ADVANCED 21,026 21,026
SURFACE
MACHINERY
SYSTEMS.
046 0603576N CHALK EAGLE.... 542,700 542,700
047 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT 88,734 88,734
SHIP (LCS).
048 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM 20,881 20,881
INTEGRATION.
049 0603595N OHIO 849,277 849,277
REPLACEMENT.
050 0603596N LCS MISSION 196,948 196,948
MODULES.
051 0603597N AUTOMATED TEST 8,115 8,115
AND RE-TEST
(ATRT).
052 0603609N CONVENTIONAL 7,603 7,603
MUNITIONS.
053 0603611M MARINE CORPS 105,749 190,849
ASSAULT
VEHICLES.
.............. Acceleratio [85,100]
n of the
ACV
Increment
1.1 Program.
054 0603635M MARINE CORPS 1,342 1,342
GROUND COMBAT/
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
055 0603654N JOINT SERVICE 21,399 21,399
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
056 0603658N COOPERATIVE 43,578 43,578
ENGAGEMENT.
057 0603713N OCEAN 7,764 7,764
ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
058 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL 13,200 13,200
PROTECTION.
059 0603724N NAVY ENERGY 69,415 69,415
PROGRAM.
060 0603725N FACILITIES 2,588 2,588
IMPROVEMENT.
061 0603734N CHALK CORAL.... 176,301 176,301
062 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC 3,873 3,873
PRODUCTIVITY.
063 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE.. 376,028 376,028
064 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA.. 272,096 272,096
065 0603751N RETRACT ELM.... 42,233 42,233
066 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN. 46,504 46,504
067 0603787N SPECIAL 25,109 25,109
PROCESSES.
068 0603790N NATO RESEARCH 9,659 9,659
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
069 0603795N LAND ATTACK 318 318
TECHNOLOGY.
070 0603851M JOINT NON- 40,912 40,912
LETHAL WEAPONS
TESTING.

[[Page H4643]]

071 0603860N JOINT PRECISION 54,896 27,896
APPROACH AND
LANDING
SYSTEMS--DEM/
VAL.
.............. Program [-27,000]
delay.
073 0603925N DIRECTED ENERGY 58,696 58,696
AND ELECTRIC
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
074 0604112N GERALD R. FORD 43,613 43,613
CLASS NUCLEAR
AIRCRAFT
CARRIER (CVN
78--80).
075 0604122N REMOTE 21,110 21,110
MINEHUNTING
SYSTEM (RMS).
076 0604272N TACTICAL AIR 5,657 5,657
DIRECTIONAL
INFRARED
COUNTERMEASURE
S (TADIRCM).
077 0604279N ASE SELF- 8,033 8,033
PROTECTION
OPTIMIZATION.
078 0604454N LX (R)......... 36,859 36,859
079 0604653N JOINT COUNTER 15,227 15,227
RADIO
CONTROLLED IED
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE
(JCREW).
081 0604707N SPACE AND 22,393 22,393
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (SEW)
ARCHITECTURE/
ENGINEERING
SUPPORT.
082 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI- 202,939 202,939
SURFACE
WARFARE WEAPON
DEVELOPMENT.
083 0605812M JOINT LIGHT 11,450 11,450
TACTICAL
VEHICLE (JLTV)
ENGINEERING
AND
MANUFACTURING
DEVELOPMENT PH.
084 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS 6,495 6,495
DEVELOPMENT--M
IP.
085 0304270N ELECTRONIC 332 332
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT--M
IP.
.............. SUBTOTAL 4,591,812 4,649,912
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
..............
.............. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
086 0603208N TRAINING SYSTEM 25,153 25,153
AIRCRAFT.
087 0604212N OTHER HELO 46,154 46,154
DEVELOPMENT.
088 0604214N AV-8B AIRCRAFT-- 25,372 25,372
ENG DEV.
089 0604215N STANDARDS 53,712 53,712
DEVELOPMENT.
090 0604216N MULTI-MISSION 11,434 11,434
HELICOPTER
UPGRADE
DEVELOPMENT.
091 0604218N AIR/OCEAN 2,164 2,164
EQUIPMENT
ENGINEERING.
092 0604221N P-3 1,710 1,710
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
093 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT 9,094 9,094
SYSTEM.
094 0604231N TACTICAL 70,248 70,248
COMMAND SYSTEM.
095 0604234N ADVANCED 193,200 193,200
HAWKEYE.
096 0604245N H-1 UPGRADES... 44,115 44,115
097 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH 23,227 23,227
SENSORS.
098 0604262N V-22A.......... 61,249 61,249
099 0604264N AIR CREW 15,014 15,014
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
100 0604269N EA-18.......... 18,730 18,730
101 0604270N ELECTRONIC 28,742 28,742
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
102 0604273N EXECUTIVE HELO 388,086 388,086
DEVELOPMENT.
103 0604274N NEXT GENERATION 246,856 246,856
JAMMER (NGJ).
104 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL 7,106 7,106
RADIO SYSTEM--
NAVY (JTRS-
NAVY).
105 0604307N SURFACE 189,112 189,112
COMBATANT
COMBAT SYSTEM
ENGINEERING.
106 0604311N LPD-17 CLASS 376 376
SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION.
107 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER 71,849 71,849
BOMB (SDB).
108 0604366N STANDARD 53,198 53,198
MISSILE
IMPROVEMENTS.
109 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM... 38,941 38,941
110 0604376M MARINE AIR 7,832 7,832
GROUND TASK
FORCE (MAGTF)
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (EW)
FOR AVIATION.
111 0604378N NAVAL 15,263 15,263
INTEGRATED
FIRE CONTROL--
COUNTER AIR
SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING.
112 0604404N UNMANNED 403,017 200,017
CARRIER
LAUNCHED
AIRBORNE
SURVEILLANCE
AND STRIKE
(UCLASS)
SYSTEM.
.............. Program [-203,000]
delay.
113 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE 20,409 20,409
WATER SENSORS.
114 0604503N SSN-688 AND 71,565 71,565
TRIDENT
MODERNIZATION.
115 0604504N AIR CONTROL.... 29,037 29,037
116 0604512N SHIPBOARD 122,083 122,083
AVIATION
SYSTEMS.
118 0604522N ADVANCED 144,706 144,706
MISSILE
DEFENSE RADAR
(AMDR) SYSTEM.
119 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN. 72,695 72,695
120 0604562N SUBMARINE 38,985 38,985
TACTICAL
WARFARE SYSTEM.
121 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT 48,470 48,470
DESIGN/ LIVE
FIRE T&E.
122 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL 3,935 3,935
COMPUTER
RESOURCES.
123 0604580N VIRGINIA 132,602 132,602
PAYLOAD MODULE
(VPM).
124 0604601N MINE 19,067 19,067
DEVELOPMENT.
125 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT 25,280 25,280
TORPEDO
DEVELOPMENT.
126 0604654N JOINT SERVICE 8,985 8,985
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
127 0604703N PERSONNEL, 7,669 7,669
TRAINING,
SIMULATION,
AND HUMAN
FACTORS.
128 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF 4,400 4,400
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
129 0604755N SHIP SELF 56,889 56,889
DEFENSE
(DETECT &
CONTROL).
130 0604756N SHIP SELF 96,937 96,937
DEFENSE
(ENGAGE: HARD
KILL).
131 0604757N SHIP SELF 134,564 134,564
DEFENSE
(ENGAGE: SOFT
KILL/EW).
132 0604761N INTELLIGENCE 200 200
ENGINEERING.
133 0604771N MEDICAL 8,287 8,287
DEVELOPMENT.
134 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID 29,504 29,504
SYSTEM.
135 0604800M JOINT STRIKE 513,021 513,021
FIGHTER (JSF)--
EMD.
136 0604800N JOINT STRIKE 516,456 516,456
FIGHTER (JSF)--
EMD.
137 0605013M INFORMATION 2,887 2,887
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
138 0605013N INFORMATION 66,317 66,317
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
139 0605212N CH-53K RDTE.... 573,187 573,187
140 0605220N SHIP TO SHORE 67,815 67,815
CONNECTOR
(SSC).
141 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO- 6,300 6,300
GROUND MISSILE
(JAGM).
142 0605500N MULTI-MISSION 308,037 323,037
MARITIME
AIRCRAFT (MMA).
.............. Wideband [15,000]
Communicati
on
Development.
143 0204202N DDG-1000....... 202,522 202,522
144 0304231N TACTICAL 1,011 1,011
COMMAND
SYSTEM--MIP.
145 0304785N TACTICAL 10,357 10,357
CRYPTOLOGIC
SYSTEMS.
146 0305124N SPECIAL 23,975 23,975
APPLICATIONS
PROGRAM.
.............. SUBTOTAL 5,419,108 5,231,108
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.

[[Page H4644]]

..............
.............. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
147 0604256N THREAT 45,272 45,272
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
148 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS 79,718 79,718
DEVELOPMENT.
149 0604759N MAJOR T&E 123,993 123,993
INVESTMENT.
150 0605126N JOINT THEATER 4,960 4,960
AIR AND
MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION.
151 0605152N STUDIES AND 8,296 8,296
ANALYSIS
SUPPORT--NAVY.
152 0605154N CENTER FOR 45,752 45,752
NAVAL ANALYSES.
154 0605804N TECHNICAL 876 876
INFORMATION
SERVICES.
155 0605853N MANAGEMENT, 72,070 72,070
TECHNICAL &
INTERNATIONAL
SUPPORT.
156 0605856N STRATEGIC 3,237 3,237
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT.
157 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE 73,033 73,033
AND TECHNOLOGY
MANAGEMENT.
158 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND 138,304 138,304
AIRCRAFT
SUPPORT.
159 0605864N TEST AND 336,286 336,286
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
160 0605865N OPERATIONAL 16,658 16,658
TEST AND
EVALUATION
CAPABILITY.
161 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND 2,505 2,505
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE (SEW)
SUPPORT.
162 0605867N SEW 8,325 8,325
SURVEILLANCE/
RECONNAISSANCE
SUPPORT.
163 0605873M MARINE CORPS 17,866 17,866
PROGRAM WIDE
SUPPORT.
.............. SUBTOTAL 977,151 977,151
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
168 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT 35,949 35,949
AIR VEHICLE
(UCAV)
ADVANCED
COMPONENT AND
PROTOTYPE
DEVELOPMENT.
169 0604766M MARINE CORPS 215 215
DATA SYSTEMS.
170 0605525N CARRIER ONBOARD 8,873 8,873
DELIVERY (COD)
FOLLOW ON.
172 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & 96,943 96,943
WEAPONS SYSTEM
SUPPORT.
173 0101224N SSBN SECURITY 30,057 30,057
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
174 0101226N SUBMARINE 4,509 4,509
ACOUSTIC
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
175 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC 13,676 13,676
COMMUNICATIONS.
176 0203761N RAPID 12,480 12,480
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSITION
(RTT).
177 0204136N F/A-18 76,216 76,216
SQUADRONS.
179 0204163N FLEET 27,281 27,281
TELECOMMUNICAT
IONS
(TACTICAL).
180 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT 2,878 2,878
181 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND 32,385 32,385
TOMAHAWK
MISSION
PLANNING
CENTER (TMPC).
182 0204311N INTEGRATED 39,371 39,371
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.
183 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS 4,609 4,609
TACTICAL
SUPPORT UNITS
(DISPLACEMENT
CRAFT).
184 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK 99,106 89,106
ORIENTED RADAR
(G/ATOR).
.............. Unjustified [-10,000]
cost growth.
185 0204571N CONSOLIDATED 39,922 39,922
TRAINING
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
186 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC 1,157 1,157
DIRECT SUPPORT.
187 0204575N ELECTRONIC 22,067 22,067
WARFARE (EW)
READINESS
SUPPORT.
188 0205601N HARM 17,420 17,420
IMPROVEMENT.
189 0205604N TACTICAL DATA 151,208 151,208
LINKS.
190 0205620N SURFACE ASW 26,366 26,366
COMBAT SYSTEM
INTEGRATION.
191 0205632N MK-48 ADCAP.... 25,952 25,952
192 0205633N AVIATION 106,936 106,936
IMPROVEMENTS.
194 0205675N OPERATIONAL 104,023 104,023
NUCLEAR POWER
SYSTEMS.
195 0206313M MARINE CORPS 77,398 77,398
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
196 0206335M COMMON AVIATION 32,495 32,495
COMMAND AND
CONTROL SYSTEM
(CAC2S).
197 0206623M MARINE CORPS 156,626 156,626
GROUND COMBAT/
SUPPORTING
ARMS SYSTEMS.
198 0206624M MARINE CORPS 20,999 20,999
COMBAT
SERVICES
SUPPORT.
199 0206625M USMC 14,179 14,179
INTELLIGENCE/
ELECTRONIC
WARFARE
SYSTEMS (MIP).
200 0207161N TACTICAL AIM 47,258 47,258
MISSILES.
201 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM 10,210 10,210
RANGE AIR-TO-
AIR MISSILE
(AMRAAM).
206 0303109N SATELLITE 41,829 41,829
COMMUNICATIONS
(SPACE).
207 0303138N CONSOLIDATED 22,780 22,780
AFLOAT NETWORK
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES
(CANES).
208 0303140N INFORMATION 23,053 23,053
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
209 0303150M WWMCCS/GLOBAL 296 296
COMMAND AND
CONTROL SYSTEM.
212 0305160N NAVY 359 359
METEOROLOGICAL
AND OCEAN
SENSORS-SPACE
(METOC).
213 0305192N MILITARY 6,166 6,166
INTELLIGENCE
PROGRAM (MIP)
ACTIVITIES.
214 0305204N TACTICAL 8,505 8,505
UNMANNED
AERIAL
VEHICLES.
216 0305208M DISTRIBUTED 11,613 11,613
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
217 0305208N DISTRIBUTED 18,146 18,146
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
218 0305220N RQ-4 UAV....... 498,003 530,403
.............. Triton [32,400]
Sensor
Development
Acceleratio
n.
219 0305231N MQ-8 UAV....... 47,294 47,294
220 0305232M RQ-11 UAV...... 718 718
221 0305233N RQ-7 UAV....... 851 851
222 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) 4,813 4,813
TACTICAL UAS
(STUASL0).
223 0305239M RQ-21A......... 8,192 8,192
224 0305241N MULTI- 22,559 22,559
INTELLIGENCE
SENSOR
DEVELOPMENT.
225 0305242M UNMANNED AERIAL 2,000 2,000
SYSTEMS (UAS)
PAYLOADS (MIP).
226 0308601N MODELING AND 4,719 4,719
SIMULATION
SUPPORT.
227 0702207N DEPOT 21,168 21,168
MAINTENANCE
(NON-IF).
228 0708011N INDUSTRIAL 37,169 37,169
PREPAREDNESS.
229 0708730N MARITIME 4,347 4,347
TECHNOLOGY
(MARITECH).
229A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 1,162,684 1,162,684
PROGRAMS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 3,286,028 3,308,428
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 16,266,335 16,183,835
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, NAVY.
..............
.............. RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
AF

[[Page H4645]]

.............. BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601102F DEFENSE 314,482 314,482
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
002 0601103F UNIVERSITY 127,079 127,079
RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY 12,929 12,929
LASER RESEARCH
INITIATIVES.
.............. SUBTOTAL 454,490 454,490
BASIC
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. APPLIED
RESEARCH
004 0602102F MATERIALS...... 105,680 105,680
005 0602201F AEROSPACE 105,747 105,747
VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGIES.
006 0602202F HUMAN 81,957 81,957
EFFECTIVENESS
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
007 0602203F AEROSPACE 172,550 369,550
PROPULSION.
.............. RD-180 [220,000]
replacement.
.............. Reduction [-23,000]
for liquid
engine
combustion
technologie
s and
advanced
liquid
engine
technologie
s.
008 0602204F AEROSPACE 118,343 118,343
SENSORS.
009 0602601F SPACE 98,229 98,229
TECHNOLOGY.
010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL 87,387 87,387
MUNITIONS.
011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY 125,955 125,955
TECHNOLOGY.
012 0602788F DOMINANT 147,789 147,789
INFORMATION
SCIENCES AND
METHODS.
013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY 37,496 37,496
LASER RESEARCH.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,081,133 1,278,133
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
014 0603112F ADVANCED 32,177 42,177
MATERIALS FOR
WEAPON SYSTEMS.
.............. Metals [10,000]
Affordabili
ty
Initiative.
015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT 15,800 15,800
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
(S&T).
016 0603203F ADVANCED 34,420 34,420
AEROSPACE
SENSORS.
017 0603211F AEROSPACE 91,062 91,062
TECHNOLOGY DEV/
DEMO.
018 0603216F AEROSPACE 124,236 124,236
PROPULSION AND
POWER
TECHNOLOGY.
019 0603270F ELECTRONIC 47,602 47,602
COMBAT
TECHNOLOGY.
020 0603401F ADVANCED 69,026 69,026
SPACECRAFT
TECHNOLOGY.
021 0603444F MAUI SPACE 14,031 14,031
SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM (MSSS).
022 0603456F HUMAN 21,788 21,788
EFFECTIVENESS
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL 42,046 42,046
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
024 0603605F ADVANCED 23,542 33,542
WEAPONS
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. Program [10,000]
increase.
025 0603680F MANUFACTURING 42,772 42,772
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
026 0603788F BATTLESPACE 35,315 35,315
KNOWLEDGE
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION.
.............. SUBTOTAL 593,817 613,817
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT &
PROTOTYPES
027 0603260F INTELLIGENCE 5,408 5,408
ADVANCED
DEVELOPMENT.
031 0603438F SPACE CONTROL 6,075 6,075
TECHNOLOGY.
032 0603742F COMBAT 10,980 10,980
IDENTIFICATION
TECHNOLOGY.
033 0603790F NATO RESEARCH 2,392 2,392
AND
DEVELOPMENT.
034 0603791F INTERNATIONAL 833 833
SPACE
COOPERATIVE
R&D.
035 0603830F SPACE SECURITY 32,313 32,313
AND DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
037 0603851F INTERCONTINENTA 30,885 30,885
L BALLISTIC
MISSILE--DEM/
VAL.
039 0603859F POLLUTION 1,798 1,798
PREVENTION--DE
M/VAL.
040 0604015F LONG RANGE 913,728 913,728
STRIKE.
042 0604317F TECHNOLOGY 2,669 2,669
TRANSFER.
045 0604422F WEATHER SYSTEM 39,901 5,001
FOLLOW-ON.
.............. Realigned [-34,900]
to DMSP-20
launch.
049 0604800F F-35--EMD...... 4,976 4,976
050 0604857F OPERATIONALLY 30,000
RESPONSIVE
SPACE.
.............. ORS Office [30,000]
and ORS-5
Competition
Launch.
051 0604858F TECH TRANSITION 59,004 59,004
PROGRAM.
054 0207110F NEXT GENERATION 15,722 15,722
AIR DOMINANCE.
055 0207455F THREE 88,825 88,825
DIMENSIONAL
LONG-RANGE
RADAR (3DELRR).
056 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL 156,659 156,659
POSITIONING
SYSTEM (USER
EQUIPMENT)
(SPACE).
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,372,168 1,367,268
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
& PROTOTYPES.
..............
.............. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT &
DEMONSTRATION
059 0604233F SPECIALIZED 13,324 13,324
UNDERGRADUATE
FLIGHT
TRAINING.
060 0604270F ELECTRONIC 1,965 1,965
WARFARE
DEVELOPMENT.
061 0604281F TACTICAL DATA 39,110 39,110
NETWORKS
ENTERPRISE.
062 0604287F PHYSICAL 3,926 3,926
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT.
063 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER 68,759 68,759
BOMB (SDB)--
EMD.
064 0604421F COUNTERSPACE 23,746 23,746
SYSTEMS.
065 0604425F SPACE SITUATION 9,462 19,462
AWARENESS
SYSTEMS.
.............. Program [10,000]
increase.
066 0604426F SPACE FENCE.... 214,131 214,131
067 0604429F AIRBORNE 30,687 30,687
ELECTRONIC
ATTACK.
068 0604441F SPACE BASED 319,501 319,501
INFRARED
SYSTEM (SBIRS)
HIGH EMD.
069 0604602F ARMAMENT/ 31,112 31,112
ORDNANCE
DEVELOPMENT.
070 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS... 2,543 2,543
071 0604617F AGILE COMBAT 46,340 46,340
SUPPORT.
072 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT 8,854 8,854
SYSTEMS.
073 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING 10,129 10,129
RANGES.
075 0604800F F-35--EMD...... 563,037 563,037
078 0604932F LONG RANGE 4,938 4,938
STANDOFF
WEAPON.
079 0604933F ICBM FUZE 59,826 59,826
MODERNIZATION.
080 0605030F JOINT TACTICAL 78 78
NETWORK CENTER
(JTNC).

[[Page H4646]]

081 0605213F F-22 173,647 173,647
MODERNIZATION
INCREMENT 3.2B.
082 0605214F GROUND ATTACK 5,332 5,332
WEAPONS FUZE
DEVELOPMENT.
083 0605221F KC-46.......... 776,937 776,937
084 0605223F ADVANCED PILOT 8,201 8,201
TRAINING.
086 0605278F HC/MC-130 RECAP 7,497 7,497
RDT&E.
087 0605431F ADVANCED EHF 314,378 314,378
MILSATCOM
(SPACE).
088 0605432F POLAR MILSATCOM 103,552 103,552
(SPACE).
089 0605433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL 31,425 31,425
SATCOM (SPACE).
090 0605458F AIR & SPACE OPS 85,938 85,938
CENTER 10.2
RDT&E.
091 0605931F B-2 DEFENSIVE 98,768 98,768
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM.
092 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS 198,357 198,357
MODERNIZATION.
094 0207701F FULL COMBAT 8,831 8,831
MISSION
TRAINING.
095 0307581F NEXTGEN JSTARS. 73,088 73,088
.............. SUBTOTAL 3,337,419 3,347,419
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
&
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
..............
.............. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
097 0604256F THREAT 24,418 24,418
SIMULATOR
DEVELOPMENT.
098 0604759F MAJOR T&E 47,232 47,232
INVESTMENT.
099 0605101F RAND PROJECT 30,443 30,443
AIR FORCE.
101 0605712F INITIAL 12,266 12,266
OPERATIONAL
TEST &
EVALUATION.
102 0605807F TEST AND 689,509 689,509
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
103 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS 34,364 34,364
LAUNCH PROGRAM
(SPACE).
104 0605864F SPACE TEST 21,161 21,161
PROGRAM (STP).
105 0605976F FACILITIES 46,955 46,955
RESTORATION
AND
MODERNIZATION-
-TEST AND
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
106 0605978F FACILITIES 32,965 32,965
SUSTAINMENT--T
EST AND
EVALUATION
SUPPORT.
107 0606017F REQUIREMENTS 13,850 13,850
ANALYSIS AND
MATURATION.
108 0606116F SPACE TEST AND 19,512 19,512
TRAINING RANGE
DEVELOPMENT.
110 0606392F SPACE AND 181,727 181,727
MISSILE CENTER
(SMC) CIVILIAN
WORKFORCE.
111 0308602F ENTEPRISE 4,938 4,938
INFORMATION
SERVICES (EIS).
112 0702806F ACQUISITION AND 18,644 18,644
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
113 0804731F GENERAL SKILL 1,425 1,425
TRAINING.
114 1001004F INTERNATIONAL 3,790 3,790
ACTIVITIES.
114A XXXXXXXF EJECTION SEAT 3,500
RELIABILITY
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
.............. Initial [3,500]
Aircraft
Qualificati
on.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,183,199 1,186,699
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
115 0603423F GLOBAL 299,760 299,760
POSITIONING
SYSTEM III--
OPERATIONAL
CONTROL
SEGMENT.
116 0604445F WIDE AREA 2,000
SURVEILLANCE.
.............. Implementat [2,000]
ion of the
Secretary's
Cruise
Missile
Defense
Program.
118 0604618F JOINT DIRECT 2,469 2,469
ATTACK
MUNITION.
119 0605018F AF INTEGRATED 90,218 90,218
PERSONNEL AND
PAY SYSTEM (AF-
IPPS).
120 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER 34,815 34,815
TECHNOLOGY
EXECUTIVE
AGENCY.
122 0101113F B-52 SQUADRONS. 55,457 55,457
123 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED 450 450
CRUISE MISSILE
(ALCM).
124 0101126F B-1B SQUADRONS. 5,353 5,353
125 0101127F B-2 SQUADRONS.. 131,580 102,180
.............. Flexible [-29,400]
Strike
execution
delay.
126 0101213F MINUTEMAN 139,109 139,109
SQUADRONS.
127 0101313F STRAT WAR 35,603 35,603
PLANNING
SYSTEM--USSTRA
TCOM.
128 0101314F NIGHT FIST-- 32 32
USSTRATCOM.
130 0102326F REGION/SECTOR 1,522 1,522
OPERATION
CONTROL CENTER
MODERNIZATION
PROGRAM.
131 0105921F SERVICE SUPPORT 3,134 3,134
TO STRATCOM--
SPACE
ACTIVITIES.
133 0205219F MQ-9 UAV....... 170,396 170,396
136 0207133F F-16 SQUADRONS. 133,105 133,105
137 0207134F F-15E SQUADRONS 261,969 261,969
138 0207136F MANNED 14,831 14,831
DESTRUCTIVE
SUPPRESSION.
139 0207138F F-22A SQUADRONS 156,962 156,962
140 0207142F F-35 SQUADRONS. 43,666 43,666
141 0207161F TACTICAL AIM 29,739 29,739
MISSILES.
142 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM 82,195 82,195
RANGE AIR-TO-
AIR MISSILE
(AMRAAM).
144 0207171F F-15 EPAWSS.... 68,944 53,444
.............. EPAWSS [-15,500]
contract
delays.
145 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE 5,095 5,095
AND RECOVERY.
146 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE-- 883 883
PARARESCUE.
147 0207247F AF TENCAP...... 5,812 15,812
.............. Program [10,000]
increase.
148 0207249F PRECISION 1,081 1,081
ATTACK SYSTEMS
PROCUREMENT.
149 0207253F COMPASS CALL... 14,411 14,411
150 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE 109,664 109,664
COMPONENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.
151 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO- 15,897 15,897
SURFACE
STANDOFF
MISSILE
(JASSM).
152 0207410F AIR & SPACE 41,066 41,066
OPERATIONS
CENTER (AOC).
153 0207412F CONTROL AND 552 552
REPORTING
CENTER (CRC).
154 0207417F AIRBORNE 180,804 180,804
WARNING AND
CONTROL SYSTEM
(AWACS).
155 0207418F TACTICAL 3,754 3,754
AIRBORNE
CONTROL
SYSTEMS.
157 0207431F COMBAT AIR 7,891 7,891
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEM
ACTIVITIES.
158 0207444F TACTICAL AIR 5,891 5,891
CONTROL PARTY-
MOD.
159 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL 1,782 1,782
DATA LINK.
161 0207452F DCAPES......... 821 821
163 0207590F SEEK EAGLE..... 23,844 23,844
164 0207601F USAF MODELING 16,723 16,723
AND SIMULATION.

[[Page H4647]]

165 0207605F WARGAMING AND 5,956 5,956
SIMULATION
CENTERS.
166 0207697F DISTRIBUTED 4,457 4,457
TRAINING AND
EXERCISES.
167 0208006F MISSION 60,679 60,679
PLANNING
SYSTEMS.
169 0208059F CYBER COMMAND 67,057 67,057
ACTIVITIES.
170 0208087F AF OFFENSIVE 13,355 13,355
CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS.
171 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE 5,576 5,576
CYBERSPACE
OPERATIONS.
179 0301400F SPACE 12,218 12,218
SUPERIORITY
INTELLIGENCE.
180 0302015F E-4B NATIONAL 28,778 28,778
AIRBORNE
OPERATIONS
CENTER (NAOC).
181 0303131F MINIMUM 81,035 81,035
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK
(MEECN).
182 0303140F INFORMATION 70,497 70,497
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
183 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT 692 692
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
185 0303601F MILSATCOM 55,208 55,208
TERMINALS.
187 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT 106,786 106,786
ENTERPRISE.
190 0305099F GLOBAL AIR 4,157 4,157
TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT
(GATM).
193 0305110F SATELLITE 20,806 20,806
CONTROL
NETWORK
(SPACE).
194 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE 25,102 25,102
195 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC 23,516 23,516
CONTROL,
APPROACH, AND
LANDING SYSTEM
(ATCALS).
196 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS. 8,639 8,639
199 0305128F SECURITY AND 498 498
INVESTIGATIVE
ACTIVITIES.
200 0305145F ARMS CONTROL 13,222 13,222
IMPLEMENTATION.
201 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT 360 360
COUNTERINTELLI
GENCE
ACTIVITIES.
206 0305173F SPACE AND 3,674 3,674
MISSILE TEST
AND EVALUATION
CENTER.
207 0305174F SPACE 2,480 2,480
INNOVATION,
INTEGRATION
AND RAPID
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
208 0305179F INTEGRATED 8,592 8,592
BROADCAST
SERVICE (IBS).
209 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE 13,462 13,462
SYSTEM (SPACE).
210 0305202F DRAGON U-2..... 5,511 5,511
212 0305206F AIRBORNE 28,113 38,113
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
.............. Per Air [10,000]
Force UFR.
213 0305207F MANNED 13,516 13,516
RECONNAISSANCE
SYSTEMS.
214 0305208F DISTRIBUTED 27,265 27,265
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
215 0305219F MQ-1 PREDATOR A 1,378 1,378
UAV.
216 0305220F RQ-4 UAV....... 244,514 244,514
217 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC 11,096 11,096
COLLABORATIVE
TARGETING.
218 0305236F COMMON DATA 36,137 36,137
LINK (CDL).
219 0305238F NATO AGS....... 232,851 232,851
220 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS 20,218 20,218
ENTERPRISE.
221 0305265F GPS III SPACE 212,571 212,571
SEGMENT.
222 0305614F JSPOC MISSION 73,779 73,779
SYSTEM.
223 0305881F RAPID CYBER 4,102 4,102
ACQUISITION.
225 0305913F NUDET DETECTION 20,468 20,468
SYSTEM (SPACE).
226 0305940F SPACE SITUATION 11,596 11,596
AWARENESS
OPERATIONS.
227 0306250F CYBER 4,938 4,938
OPERATIONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
228 0308699F SHARED EARLY 1,212 1,212
WARNING (SEW).
230 0401119F C-5 AIRLIFT 38,773 38,773
SQUADRONS (IF).
231 0401130F C-17 AIRCRAFT 83,773 83,773
(IF).
232 0401132F C-130J PROGRAM. 26,715 26,715
233 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT 5,172 5,172
IR
COUNTERMEASURE
S (LAIRCM).
234 0401219F KC-10S......... 2,714 2,714
235 0401314F OPERATIONAL 27,784 27,784
SUPPORT
AIRLIFT.
236 0401318F CV-22.......... 38,719 38,719
237 0401319F PRESIDENTIAL 11,006 11,006
AIRCRAFT
REPLACEMENT
(PAR).
238 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS 8,405 8,405
/ COMBAT
CONTROL.
239 0702207F DEPOT 1,407 1,407
MAINTENANCE
(NON-IF).
241 0708610F LOGISTICS 109,685 109,685
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
(LOGIT).
242 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS 16,209 16,209
DEVELOPMENT.
243 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT 987 987
TRAINING.
244 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL 126 126
ACTIVITIES.
245 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL 2,603 2,603
RECOVERY
AGENCY.
246 0901218F CIVILIAN 1,589 1,589
COMPENSATION
PROGRAM.
247 0901220F PERSONNEL 5,026 5,026
ADMINISTRATION.
248 0901226F AIR FORCE 1,394 1,394
STUDIES AND
ANALYSIS
AGENCY.
249 0901279F FACILITIES 3,798 3,798
OPERATION--ADM
INISTRATIVE.
250 0901538F FINANCIAL 107,314 107,314
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
250A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 11,441,120 11,363,920
PROGRAMS.
.............. Classified [25,000]
program
increase.
.............. Classified [-102,200]
program
reduction.
.............. SUBTOTAL 15,717,666 15,617,566
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 23,739,892 23,865,392
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, AF.
..............
.............. RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMENT,
TEST & EVAL,
DW
.............. BASIC RESEARCH
001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC 37,778 37,778
RESEARCH
INITIATIVE.
002 0601101E DEFENSE 312,146 312,146
RESEARCH
SCIENCES.
003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH 44,564 34,564
INITIATIVES.
.............. National [-10,000]
Security
Science and
Engineering
Faculty
Fellowship
program.
004 0601117E BASIC 49,848 49,848
OPERATIONAL
MEDICAL
RESEARCH
SCIENCE.
005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL 45,488 55,488
DEFENSE
EDUCATION
PROGRAM.
.............. Pre- [10,000]
Kindergarte
n to 12th
Grade STEM
Programs.
006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY 24,412 34,412
BLACK COLLEGES
AND
UNIVERSITIES/
MINORITY
INSTITUTIONS.
.............. Historicall [10,000]
y Black
Colleges
and
Universitie
s.
007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND 48,261 48,261
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.

[[Page H4648]]

.............. SUBTOTAL 562,497 572,497
BASIC
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. APPLIED
RESEARCH
008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS 20,065 20,065
TECHNOLOGY.
009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL 112,242 112,242
TECHNOLOGY.
011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN 51,875 51,875
LABORATORY
RESEARCH
PROGRAM.
012 0602251D8Z APPLIED 41,965 41,965
RESEARCH FOR
THE
ADVANCEMENT OF
S&T PRIORITIES.
013 0602303E INFORMATION & 334,407 334,407
COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGY.
015 0602383E BIOLOGICAL 44,825 44,825
WARFARE
DEFENSE.
016 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND 226,317 226,317
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
018 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY 15,000 15,000
RESEARCH.
020 0602702E TACTICAL 305,484 305,484
TECHNOLOGY.
021 0602715E MATERIALS AND 160,389 160,389
BIOLOGICAL
TECHNOLOGY.
022 0602716E ELECTRONICS 179,203 179,203
TECHNOLOGY.
023 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS 151,737 151,737
DESTRUCTION
DEFEAT
TECHNOLOGIES.
024 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE 9,156 9,156
ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE
(SEI) APPLIED
RESEARCH.
025 1160401BB SOF TECHNOLOGY 39,750 39,750
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. SUBTOTAL 1,692,415 1,692,415
APPLIED
RESEARCH.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
026 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS 26,688 26,688
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
027 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED 8,682 8,682
DEVELOPMENT.
028 0603122D8Z COMBATING 69,675 89,675
TERRORISM
TECHNOLOGY
SUPPORT.
.............. Program [20,000]
emphasis
for CT and
Irregular
Warfare
Programs.
029 0603133D8Z FOREIGN 30,000 24,000
COMPARATIVE
TESTING.
.............. Program [-6,000]
decrease.
030 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFER 283,694 283,694
ATION
INITIATIVES--P
ROLIFERATION
PREVENTION AND
DEFEAT.
032 0603176C ADVANCED 8,470 8,470
CONCEPTS AND
PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT.
033 0603177C DISCRIMINATION 45,110 45,110
SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY.
034 0603178C WEAPONS 14,068 27,416
TECHNOLOGY.
.............. MDA DE [13,348]
Ballistic
Missile
Kill
Capability
Development.
035 0603179C ADVANCED C4ISR. 15,329 15,329
036 0603180C ADVANCED 16,584 16,584
RESEARCH.
037 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE 19,335 19,335
MUNITIONS
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
038 0603264S AGILE 2,544 2,544
TRANSPORTATION
FOR THE 21ST
CENTURY
(AT21)--THEATE
R CAPABILITY.
039 0603274C SPECIAL 51,033 51,033
PROGRAM--MDA
TECHNOLOGY.
040 0603286E ADVANCED 129,723 129,723
AEROSPACE
SYSTEMS.
041 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS 179,883 179,883
AND TECHNOLOGY.
042 0603288D8Z ANALYTIC 12,000 12,000
ASSESSMENTS.
043 0603289D8Z ADVANCED 60,000 50,000
INNOVATIVE
ANALYSIS AND
CONCEPTS.
.............. Program [-10,000]
decrease.
044 0603294C COMMON KILL 25,639 25,639
VEHICLE
TECHNOLOGY.
045 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND 132,674 132,674
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--ADVAN
CED
DEVELOPMENT.
046 0603618D8Z JOINT 10,965 10,965
ELECTRONIC
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY.
047 0603648D8Z JOINT 131,960 121,960
CAPABILITY
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
.............. Program [-10,000]
decrease.
052 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE 91,095 91,095
MANUFACTURING
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM.
053 0603699D8Z EMERGING 33,706 33,706
CAPABILITIES
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
054 0603712S GENERIC 16,836 16,836
LOGISTICS R&D
TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS.
055 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND 29,683 29,683
DISTRIBUTION
ENTERPRISE
TECHNOLOGY.
056 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC 57,796 57,796
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH
PROGRAM.
057 0603720S MICROELECTRONIC 72,144 72,144
S TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT
AND SUPPORT.
058 0603727D8Z JOINT 7,405 7,405
WARFIGHTING
PROGRAM.
059 0603739E ADVANCED 92,246 92,246
ELECTRONICS
TECHNOLOGIES.
060 0603760E COMMAND, 243,265 243,265
CONTROL AND
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS.
062 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC 386,926 386,926
WARFARE
TECHNOLOGY.
063 0603767E SENSOR 312,821 312,821
TECHNOLOGY.
064 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED 10,692 10,692
LEARNING
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
065 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE 15,776 15,776
ENGINEERING
INSTITUTE.
066 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION 69,319 64,319
SPECIAL
PROJECTS.
.............. Program [-5,000]
decrease.
068 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING 3,000 3,000
AND SIMULATION
MANAGEMENT
OFFICE.
071 0603941D8Z TEST & 81,148 81,148
EVALUATION
SCIENCE &
TECHNOLOGY.
072 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL 31,800 31,800
ENERGY
CAPABILITY
IMPROVEMENT.
073 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS... 46,066 46,066
074 1160402BB SOF ADVANCED 57,622 57,622
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
.............. SUBTOTAL 2,933,402 2,935,750
ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
AND PROTOTYPES
077 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND 41,072 41,072
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT
RDT&E ADC&P.
079 0603600D8Z WALKOFF........ 90,558 90,558
080 0603714D8Z ADVANCED 15,518 15,518
SENSORS
APPLICATION
PROGRAM.
081 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL 51,462 51,462
SECURITY
TECHNICAL
CERTIFICATION
PROGRAM.
082 0603881C BALLISTIC 299,598 299,598
MISSILE
DEFENSE
TERMINAL
DEFENSE
SEGMENT.
083 0603882C BALLISTIC 1,003,768 1,043,768
MISSILE
DEFENSE
MIDCOURSE
DEFENSE
SEGMENT.
.............. BMD program [40,000]
increase.
084 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND 179,236 179,236
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--DEM/
VAL.
085 0603884C BALLISTIC 392,893 392,893
MISSILE
DEFENSE
SENSORS.
086 0603890C BMD ENABLING 410,863 410,863
PROGRAMS.
087 0603891C SPECIAL 310,261 310,261
PROGRAMS--MDA.
088 0603892C AEGIS BMD...... 929,208 929,208
089 0603893C SPACE TRACKING 31,346 31,346
& SURVEILLANCE
SYSTEM.

[[Page H4649]]

090 0603895C BALLISTIC 6,389 6,389
MISSILE
DEFENSE SYSTEM
SPACE PROGRAMS.
091 0603896C BALLISTIC 443,484 443,484
MISSILE
DEFENSE
COMMAND AND
CONTROL,
BATTLE
MANAGEMENT AND
COMMUNICATI.
092 0603898C BALLISTIC 46,387 46,387
MISSILE
DEFENSE JOINT
WARFIGHTER
SUPPORT.
093 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE 58,530 58,530
INTEGRATION &
OPERATIONS
CENTER (MDIOC).
094 0603906C REGARDING 16,199 16,199
TRENCH.
095 0603907C SEA BASED X- 64,409 64,409
BAND RADAR
(SBX).
096 0603913C ISRAELI 96,803 268,803
COOPERATIVE
PROGRAMS.
.............. Program [172,000]
increase
for Israeli
Cooperative
Programs.
097 0603914C BALLISTIC 386,482 386,482
MISSILE
DEFENSE TEST.
098 0603915C BALLISTIC 485,294 485,294
MISSILE
DEFENSE
TARGETS.
099 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN 10,194 10,194
DEMINING.
100 0603923D8Z COALITION 10,139 10,139
WARFARE.
101 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF 2,907 2,907
DEFENSE
CORROSION
PROGRAM.
102 0604250D8Z ADVANCED 190,000 170,000
INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGIES.
.............. Program [-20,000]
decrease.
103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF 3,702 3,702
DEFENSE (DOD)
UNMANNED
AIRCRAFT
SYSTEM (UAS)
COMMON
DEVELOPMENT.
104 0604445J WIDE AREA 53,000 53,000
SURVEILLANCE.
107 0604787J JOINT SYSTEMS 7,002 7,002
INTEGRATION.
108 0604828J JOINT FIRES 7,102 7,102
INTEGRATION
AND
INTEROPERABILI
TY TEAM.
109 0604880C LAND-BASED SM-3 123,444 123,444
(LBSM3).
110 0604881C AEGIS SM-3 263,695 263,695
BLOCK IIA CO-
DEVELOPMENT.
113 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO 12,500 12,500
NETWORKS AND
INFORMATION
INTEGRATION.
114 0303191D8Z JOINT 2,656 2,656
ELECTROMAGNETI
C TECHNOLOGY
(JET) PROGRAM.
115 0305103C CYBER SECURITY 961 961
INITIATIVE.
.............. SUBTOTAL 6,047,062 6,239,062
ADVANCED
COMPONENT
DEVELOPMENT
AND
PROTOTYPES.
..............
.............. SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION
116 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND 7,936 7,936
CONVENTIONAL
PHYSICAL
SECURITY
EQUIPMENT
RDT&E SDD.
117 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL 70,762 70,762
STRIKE
CAPABILITY
DEVELOPMENT.
118 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND 345,883 345,883
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM--EMD.
119 0604764K ADVANCED IT 25,459 25,459
SERVICES JOINT
PROGRAM OFFICE
(AITS-JPO).
120 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL 17,562 17,562
INFORMATION
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM (JTIDS).
121 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS 6,887 6,887
DESTRUCTION
DEFEAT
CAPABILITIES.
122 0605013BL INFORMATION 12,530 12,530
TECHNOLOGY
DEVELOPMENT.
123 0605021SE HOMELAND 286 286
PERSONNEL
SECURITY
INITIATIVE.
124 0605022D8Z DEFENSE 3,244 3,244
EXPORTABILITY
PROGRAM.
125 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT 6,500 6,500
DEVELOPMENT
INITIATIVES.
126 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE 15,326 15,326
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATION.
127 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND 19,351 19,351
INTEGRATION.
128 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY 41,465 41,465
INTIATIVES
(DAI)--FINANCI
AL SYSTEM.
129 0605090S DEFENSE RETIRED 10,135 10,135
AND ANNUITANT
PAY SYSTEM
(DRAS).
130 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE 9,546 9,546
ELECTRONIC
PROCUREMENT
CAPABILITIES.
131 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT 14,241 14,241
SUPPORT SYSTEM.
132 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE 3,660 3,660
ENERGY
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
(EEIM).
.............. SUBTOTAL 610,773 610,773
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
AND
DEMONSTRATIO
N.
..............
.............. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
133 0604774D8Z DEFENSE 5,616 5,616
READINESS
REPORTING
SYSTEM (DRRS).
134 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS 3,092 3,092
ARCHITECTURE
DEVELOPMENT.
135 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST 254,503 254,503
AND EVALUATION
INVESTMENT
DEVELOPMENT
(CTEIP).
136 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND 21,661 21,661
EVALUATIONS.
138 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION 27,162 27,162
ENVIRONMENT
TEST
CAPABILITY
(JMETC).
139 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL 24,501 24,501
STUDIES,
SUPPORT AND
ANALYSIS.
142 0605126J JOINT 43,176 43,176
INTEGRATED AIR
AND MISSILE
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION
(JIAMDO).
145 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS 44,246 44,246
ENGINEERING.
146 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND 2,665 2,665
ANALYSIS
SUPPORT--OSD.
147 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS- 4,366 4,366
PHYSICAL
SECURITY.
148 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO 27,901 27,901
NETWORKS AND
INFORMATION
INTEGRATION.
149 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT 2,855 2,855
TO USD
(INTELLIGENCE).
150 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND 105,944 105,944
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
PROGRAM.
156 0605502KA SMALL BUSINESS 400 400
INNOVATIVE
RESEARCH.
159 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS 1,634 1,634
INNOVATION
RESEARCH
(SBIR)/ SMALL
BUSINESS
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER.
160 0605798D8Z DEFENSE 12,105 12,105
TECHNOLOGY
ANALYSIS.
161 0605801KA DEFENSE 50,389 50,389
TECHNICAL
INFORMATION
CENTER (DTIC).
162 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT 8,452 8,452
OF DOD
ENLISTMENT,
TESTING AND
EVALUATION.
163 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT 15,187 19,187
TEST AND
EVALUATION.
.............. Program [4,000]
increase.
164 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ-- 71,362 71,362
R&D.
165 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND 4,100 4,100
PROGRAM
ASSESSMENTS.
166 0203345D8Z DEFENSE 1,956 1,956
OPERATIONS
SECURITY
INITIATIVE
(DOSI).
167 0204571J JOINT STAFF 10,321 10,321
ANALYTICAL
SUPPORT.
170 0303166J SUPPORT TO 11,552 11,552
INFORMATION
OPERATIONS
(IO)
CAPABILITIES.
172 0305193D8Z CYBER 6,748 6,748
INTELLIGENCE.
174 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE 44,005 44,005
ENGAGEMENT AND
TRAINING
TRANSFORMATION
(CE2T2).
175 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ-- 36,998 36,998
MDA.
176 0901598D8W MANAGEMENT 612 612
HEADQUARTERS
WHS.
177A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 44,367 44,367
PROGRAMS.
.............. SUBTOTAL 887,876 891,876
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............

[[Page H4650]]

.............. OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT
178 0604130V ENTERPRISE 3,988 3,988
SECURITY
SYSTEM (ESS).
179 0605127T REGIONAL 1,750 1,750
INTERNATIONAL
OUTREACH (RIO)
AND
PARTNERSHIP
FOR PEACE
INFORMATION
MANA.
180 0605147T OVERSEAS 286 286
HUMANITARIAN
ASSISTANCE
SHARED
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
(OHASIS).
181 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE 14,778 14,778
ANALYSIS AND
SUSTAINMENT
SUPPORT.
182 0607310D8Z OPERATIONAL 2,953 2,953
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
183 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER 10,350 10,350
SECURITY
COOPERATION
MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS (G-
TSCMIS).
184 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND 28,496 28,496
BIOLOGICAL
DEFENSE
(OPERATIONAL
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT).
185 0607828J JOINT 11,968 11,968
INTEGRATION
AND
INTEROPERABILI
TY.
186 0208043J PLANNING AND 1,842 1,842
DECISION AID
SYSTEM (PDAS).
187 0208045K C4I 63,558 63,558
INTEROPERABILI
TY.
189 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED 3,931 3,931
COALITION
INFORMATION
SHARING.
193 0302016K NATIONAL 924 924
MILITARY
COMMAND SYSTEM-
WIDE SUPPORT.
194 0302019K DEFENSE INFO 9,657 9,657
INFRASTRUCTURE
ENGINEERING
AND
INTEGRATION.
195 0303126K LONG-HAUL 25,355 25,355
COMMUNICATIONS
-DCS.
196 0303131K MINIMUM 12,671 12,671
ESSENTIAL
EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS
NETWORK
(MEECN).
197 0303135G PUBLIC KEY 222 222
INFRASTRUCTURE
(PKI).
198 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT 32,698 32,698
INFRASTRUCTURE
(KMI).
199 0303140D8Z INFORMATION 11,304 11,304
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
200 0303140G INFORMATION 125,854 145,854
SYSTEMS
SECURITY
PROGRAM.
.............. Accelerate [20,000]
SHARKSEER
deployment.
202 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND 33,793 33,793
AND CONTROL
SYSTEM.
203 0303153K DEFENSE 13,423 13,423
SPECTRUM
ORGANIZATION.
204 0303170K NET-CENTRIC 3,774 3,774
ENTERPRISE
SERVICES
(NCES).
205 0303260D8Z DEFENSE 951 951
MILITARY
DECEPTION
PROGRAM OFFICE
(DMDPO).
206 0303610K TELEPORT 2,697 2,697
PROGRAM.
208 0304210BB SPECIAL 19,294 19,294
APPLICATIONS
FOR
CONTINGENCIES.
212 0305103K CYBER SECURITY 3,234 3,234
INITIATIVE.
213 0305125D8Z CRITICAL 8,846 8,846
INFRASTRUCTURE
PROTECTION
(CIP).
217 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D 7,065 7,065
PROGRAMS.
218 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY. 23,984 23,984
221 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED 5,286 5,286
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
224 0305208K DISTRIBUTED 3,400 3,400
COMMON GROUND/
SURFACE
SYSTEMS.
229 0305327V INSIDER THREAT. 8,670 8,670
230 0305387D8Z HOMELAND 2,110 2,110
DEFENSE
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER
PROGRAM.
239 0708011S INDUSTRIAL 22,366 22,366
PREPAREDNESS.
240 0708012S LOGISTICS 1,574 1,574
SUPPORT
ACTIVITIES.
241 0902298J MANAGEMENT HQ-- 4,409 4,409
OJCS.
242 1105219BB MQ-9 UAV....... 9,702 9,702
243 1105232BB RQ-11 UAV...... 259 259
245 1160403BB AVIATION 164,233 164,233
SYSTEMS.
247 1160405BB INTELLIGENCE 9,490 9,490
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT.
248 1160408BB OPERATIONAL 75,253 75,253
ENHANCEMENTS.
252 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS 24,661 24,661
253 1160432BB SPECIAL 20,908 20,908
PROGRAMS.
259 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL 3,672 3,672
VEHICLES.
262 1160483BB MARITIME 57,905 57,905
SYSTEMS.
264 1160489BB GLOBAL VIDEO 3,788 3,788
SURVEILLANCE
ACTIVITIES.
265 1160490BB OPERATIONAL 16,225 16,225
ENHANCEMENTS
INTELLIGENCE.
265A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED 3,118,502 3,113,502
PROGRAMS.
.............. Classified [-5,000]
adjustment.
.............. SUBTOTAL 4,032,059 4,047,059
OPERATIONAL
SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 16,766,084 16,989,432
RESEARCH,
DEVELOPMEN
T, TEST &
EVAL, DW.
..............
.............. OPERATIONAL
TEST & EVAL,
DEFENSE
.............. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL 74,583 74,583
TEST AND
EVALUATION.
002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST 45,142 45,142
AND EVALUATION.
003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL 48,013 53,013
TEST
ACTIVITIES AND
ANALYSES.
.............. Information [5,000]
Assurance
Testing and
Exercises.
.............. SUBTOTAL 167,738 172,738
MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT.
..............
.............. TOTAL 167,738 172,738
OPERATIONA
L TEST &
EVAL,
DEFENSE.
..............
.............. TOTAL 63,533,947 63,791,399
RDT&E.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLIII--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2015 House
Line Item Request Authorized
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY

[[Page H4651]]

OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS.................................................... 969,281 1,069,281
Restore Critical Operations Tempo............................. [100,000]
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES.......................................... 61,990 61,990
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................ 450,987 450,487
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.............................................. 545,773 543,773
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,000]
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................... 1,057,453 1,046,453
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-10,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,000]
060 AVIATION ASSETS................................................... 1,409,347 1,547,947
Restore Critical Aviation Readiness........................... [100,000]
UH-60A to UH-60L Conversions/ARNG Modernization............... [38,600]
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................ 3,592,334 3,567,334
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-19,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-5,500]
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS..................................... 411,388 411,388
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................... 1,001,232 1,100,732
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................ [100,000]
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT........................................... 7,428,972 7,346,972
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-27,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-55,000]
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 2,066,434 1,976,434
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-7,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-58,000]
Transfer to Arlington National Cemetery....................... [-25,000]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS........................... 411,863 411,363
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS.............................. 179,399 178,899
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
170 COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT......................... 432,281 429,781
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,500]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 20,018,734 20,142,834

MOBILIZATION
180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY................................................ 316,776 315,776
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
190 ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS......................................... 187,609 186,109
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS........................................... 6,463 86,463
Industrial Base Intiative-Body Armor.......................... [80,000]
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION......................................... 510,848 588,348

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
210 OFFICER ACQUISITION............................................... 124,766 123,766
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
220 RECRUIT TRAINING.................................................. 51,968 51,468
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING......................................... 43,735 43,735
240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS............................ 456,563 456,063
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........................................ 886,529 876,029
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-8,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,000]
260 FLIGHT TRAINING................................................... 890,070 890,070
270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................ 193,291 190,291
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
280 TRAINING SUPPORT.................................................. 552,359 551,359
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................ 466,927 461,427
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-5,500]
300 EXAMINING......................................................... 194,588 194,588
310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION.................................. 205,782 197,782
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-8,000]
320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING................................... 150,571 149,071
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
330 JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS............................. 169,784 162,784
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-7,000]
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING.............................. 4,386,933 4,348,433

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................ 541,877 541,877
360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES......................................... 722,291 722,291
370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES....................................... 602,034 604,034
Corrosion Mitigation Activities............................... [5,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,500]

[[Page H4652]]

Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT............................................. 422,277 419,777
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,000]
390 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 405,442 404,942
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................ 1,624,742 1,622,742
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,500]
410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT............................................... 289,771 289,271
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT........................................... 390,924 385,424
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-5,500]
430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT............................................. 1,118,540 1,117,040
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES............................................ 241,234 239,734
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT............................................ 243,509 242,509
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
460 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS.......................... 200,615 199,115
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
470 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS............................... 462,591 462,091
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
480 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS.................................... 27,375 27,375
520A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............................................... 1,030,411 1,029,411
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES........................... 8,323,633 8,307,633

UNDISTRIBUTED
530 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -516,200
Civilian personnel underexecution............................. [-80,000]
Foreign Currency adjustments.................................. [-48,900]
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-387,300]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -516,200

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY.......................... 33,240,148 32,871,048

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
OPERATING FORCES
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES.......................................... 15,200 15,200
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................ 502,664 532,164
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Restore Critical Operations Tempo............................. [30,000]
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.............................................. 107,489 107,489
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................... 543,989 543,989
060 AVIATION ASSETS................................................... 72,963 72,963
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................ 360,082 358,082
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS..................................... 72,491 72,491
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................... 58,873 93,873
Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................ [35,000]
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT........................................... 388,961 386,461
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,500]
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 228,597 219,097
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-9,000]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS........................... 39,590 39,590
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 2,390,899 2,441,399

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................ 10,608 10,608
140 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 18,587 18,587
150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................ 6,681 6,681
160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT............................................... 9,192 9,192
170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................ 54,602 54,102
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES............................. 99,670 99,170

UNDISTRIBUTED
180 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -38,700
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-38,700]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -38,700

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES...................... 2,490,569 2,501,869

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
OPERATING FORCES
010 MANEUVER UNITS.................................................... 660,648 909,748
National Guard combat training center rotations activities.... [70,000]
National Guard critical operations tempo activities........... [99,600]

[[Page H4653]]

Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Restore Critical Operations Tempo............................. [80,000]
020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES.......................................... 165,942 165,942
030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE............................................ 733,800 733,800
040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS.............................................. 83,084 83,084
050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT.................................... 22,005 22,005
060 AVIATION ASSETS................................................... 920,085 920,085
070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................ 680,887 673,887
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-5,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,000]
080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS..................................... 69,726 69,726
090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE..................................... 138,263 185,863
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,500]
Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................ [49,600]
100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT........................................... 804,517 792,017
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-10,000]
110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 490,205 471,705
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-18,500]
120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS........................... 872,140 871,140
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 5,641,302 5,899,002

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................ 6,690 6,690
140 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT............................................ 1,765 1,765
150 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 63,075 65,075
National Guard State Partnership Program...................... [2,000]
160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................ 37,372 37,372
170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT............................................... 6,484 6,484
180 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT........................................... 274,085 269,585
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-4,500]
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES............................. 389,471 386,971

UNDISTRIBUTED
190 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -72,400
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-72,400]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -72,400

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG.......................... 6,030,773 6,213,573

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS............................... 4,947,202 5,002,202
FHP Unit Level Maintenance.................................... [56,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
020 FLEET AIR TRAINING................................................ 1,647,943 1,659,443
FHP Unit Level Maintenance.................................... [12,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES.................... 37,050 37,050
040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT................................. 96,139 95,639
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT............................................... 363,763 362,763
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE........................................ 814,770 935,870
Aviation Depot Maintenance.................................... [111,000]
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [10,100]
070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................. 36,494 36,494
080 AVIATION LOGISTICS................................................ 350,641 473,141
Aviation Logistics........................................... [123,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS................................. 3,865,379 3,959,879
Joint High Speed Vessel Operations........................... [10,000]
CLF steaming days............................................. [13,000]
Corrosion Mitigation Activities............................... [5,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-5,500]
T-AKEs to Full Operational Status............................. [72,000]
100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING................................ 711,243 709,743
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,000]
110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............................................ 5,296,408 5,327,608
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [33,700]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT..................................... 1,339,077 1,335,877
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [300]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-3,500]
130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS............................................. 708,634 706,634
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,000]
140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE................................................ 91,599 91,099
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]

[[Page H4654]]

150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE.................................... 207,038 206,538
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
160 WARFARE TACTICS................................................... 432,715 431,715
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY.......................... 338,116 337,616
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES............................................. 892,316 891,316
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE............................................. 128,486 128,486
200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT.......................................... 2,472 2,472
210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS.............................. 101,200 100,700
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT....................... 188,920 186,420
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,500]
230 CRUISE MISSILE.................................................... 109,911 109,911
240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE........................................... 1,172,823 1,172,823
250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT................................ 104,139 104,139
260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE............................................... 490,911 490,411
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT...................................... 324,861 323,861
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
290 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION............................................ 936,743 934,243
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,500]
300 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION........................ 1,483,495 1,422,995
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-60,500]
310 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................ 4,398,667 4,364,167
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-34,500]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 31,619,155 31,941,255

MOBILIZATION
320 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE..................................... 526,926 526,926
330 READY RESERVE FORCE............................................... 195 195
340 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS................................ 6,704 6,704
350 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS.................................... 251,538 205,538
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [-46,000]
360 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS............................. 124,323 124,323
370 INDUSTRIAL READINESS.............................................. 2,323 2,323
380 COAST GUARD SUPPORT............................................... 20,333 20,333
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION......................................... 932,342 886,342

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
390 OFFICER ACQUISITION............................................... 156,214 155,714
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
400 RECRUIT TRAINING.................................................. 8,863 8,963
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [100]
410 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS................................... 148,150 148,150
420 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........................................ 601,501 604,201
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [7,200]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-4,500]
430 FLIGHT TRAINING................................................... 8,239 8,239
440 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................ 164,214 165,362
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [1,000]
Naval Sea Cadets.............................................. [1,148]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
450 TRAINING SUPPORT.................................................. 182,619 183,019
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [900]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
460 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................ 230,589 230,089
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
470 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION.................................. 115,595 114,095
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
480 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING................................... 79,606 79,106
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
490 JUNIOR ROTC....................................................... 41,664 39,664
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,000]
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING.............................. 1,737,254 1,736,602

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
500 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 858,871 852,871
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-6,000]
510 EXTERNAL RELATIONS................................................ 12,807 12,807
520 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT........................ 119,863 119,863
530 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT........................ 356,113 353,013
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [900]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-4,000]
540 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT........................................... 255,605 255,105
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
550 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................ 339,802 337,802
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,000]
570 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................ 172,203 172,203
590 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN.................................. 283,621 282,621
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]

[[Page H4655]]

Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
600 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................ 1,111,464 1,110,464
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
610 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT........................... 43,232 43,232
620 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS............................................ 25,689 25,689
630 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS.............................. 73,159 72,659
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
640 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE....................................... 548,640 548,140
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
700 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES........................... 4,713 4,713
720A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............................................... 531,324 530,324
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES............................. 4,737,106 4,721,506

UNDISTRIBUTED
730 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -402,900
Civilian personnel underexecution............................. [-80,000]
Foreign Currency adjustments.................................. [-74,200]
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-248,700]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -402,900

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY.......................... 39,025,857 38,882,805

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATIONAL FORCES................................................ 905,744 944,044
Corrosion Mitigation Activities............................... [5,000]
Crisis Response Operations Unfunded Requirement............... [33,800]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
020 FIELD LOGISTICS................................................... 921,543 920,543
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE................................................. 229,058 280,058
Restore Critical Depot Maintenance............................ [51,000]
040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING........................................... 87,660 87,660
050 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION.......................... 573,926 556,926
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-16,000]
060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................ 1,983,118 1,977,618
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-4,000]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 4,701,049 4,766,849

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
070 RECRUIT TRAINING.................................................. 18,227 18,227
080 OFFICER ACQUISITION............................................... 948 948
090 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........................................ 98,448 98,448
100 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................ 42,305 42,305
110 TRAINING SUPPORT.................................................. 330,156 328,156
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,500]
120 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................ 161,752 161,752
130 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION.................................. 19,137 18,637
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
140 JUNIOR ROTC....................................................... 23,277 23,277
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING.............................. 694,250 691,750

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................ 36,359 36,359
160 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 362,608 352,508
Marine Museum Unjustified Growth.............................. [-9,100]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................ 70,515 70,515
180A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............................................... 44,706 44,706
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES............................. 514,188 504,088

UNDISTRIBUTED
190 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -109,900
Foreign Currency adjustments.................................. [-28,400]
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-81,500]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -109,900

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS.................. 5,909,487 5,852,787

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
OPERATING FORCES
010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS............................... 565,842 573,742
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [7,900]
020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE.......................................... 5,948 5,948
040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE........................................ 82,636 84,936

[[Page H4656]]

CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH).................. [2,300]
050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT................................. 353 353
060 AVIATION LOGISTICS................................................ 7,007 7,007
070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS................................. 8,190 8,190
080 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING................................ 556 556
090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE............................................ 4,571 4,571
100 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS............................................. 14,472 14,472
110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES............................................. 119,056 119,056
120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE............................................... 1,852 1,852
130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION............................................ 25,354 25,354
140 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION........................ 48,271 46,271
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,000]
150 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................ 101,921 101,421
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 986,029 993,729

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
160 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 1,520 1,520
170 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT........................ 12,998 12,998
180 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................ 3,395 3,395
190 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT................................ 3,158 3,158
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES............................. 21,071 21,071

UNDISTRIBUTED
210 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -10,500
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-10,500]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -10,500

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES...................... 1,007,100 1,004,300

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 OPERATING FORCES.................................................. 93,093 93,093
020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE................................................. 18,377 18,377
030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION........................ 29,232 27,732
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,500]
040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT............................................ 106,447 105,447
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,000]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 247,149 244,649

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
050 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION........................................ 914 914
060 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 11,831 11,831
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................ 8,688 8,688
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES............................. 21,433 21,433

UNDISTRIBUTED
080 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -100
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-100]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -100

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE.................... 268,582 265,982

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES............................................. 3,163,457 3,256,557
Corrosion Prevention.......................................... [5,000]
Cyber Weapon System Ops....................................... [50,000]
Cyberspace Defense Weapon System and Cyber Mission Forces..... [30,000]
Nuclear Force Improvement Program--Security Forces............ [8,600]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES......................................... 1,694,339 1,686,339
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-8,000]
030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS).................... 1,579,178 1,574,678
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,500]
040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE................................................. 6,119,522 6,111,522
RC/OC-135 Contractor Logistics Support Unjustified Growth..... [-8,000]
050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 1,453,589 1,447,989
Nuclear Force Improvement Program--Installation Surety........ [3,400]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-9,000]
060 BASE SUPPORT...................................................... 2,599,419 2,587,419
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-10,000]
070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING...................................... 908,790 919,861
Program increase.............................................. [14,571]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,000]
080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS..................................... 856,306 862,906
Nuclear Force Improvement Program--ICBM Training Hardware..... [9,600]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-3,000]
090 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES....................... 800,689 800,189

[[Page H4657]]

Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
100 LAUNCH FACILITIES................................................. 282,710 282,710
110 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS............................................. 397,818 397,318
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
120 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT....................... 871,840 884,440
PACOM Prepositioned Munition Shortfall Mitigation............. [19,100]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-6,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS.............................. 237,348 237,348
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 20,965,005 21,049,276

MOBILIZATION
140 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS................................................ 1,968,810 1,966,310
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,500]
150 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS......................................... 139,743 139,243
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
160 DEPOT MAINTENANCE................................................. 1,534,560 1,534,560
170 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 173,627 171,627
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,000]
180 BASE SUPPORT...................................................... 688,801 686,301
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,000]
SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION......................................... 4,505,541 4,498,041

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
190 OFFICER ACQUISITION............................................... 82,396 82,396
200 RECRUIT TRAINING.................................................. 19,852 19,852
210 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)............................ 76,134 73,134
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-3,000]
220 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 212,226 208,726
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-3,500]
230 BASE SUPPORT...................................................... 759,809 754,309
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-4,500]
240 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING........................................ 356,157 356,157
250 FLIGHT TRAINING................................................... 697,594 694,594
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,500]
260 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION................................ 219,441 218,441
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
270 TRAINING SUPPORT.................................................. 91,001 91,001
280 DEPOT MAINTENANCE................................................. 316,688 316,688
290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................ 73,920 73,920
300 EXAMINING......................................................... 3,121 3,121
310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION.................................. 181,718 174,218
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-7,500]
320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING................................... 147,667 147,167
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
330 JUNIOR ROTC....................................................... 63,250 60,250
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-3,000]
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING.............................. 3,300,974 3,273,974

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
340 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS.............................................. 1,003,513 1,044,013
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
SDT Program................................................... [41,000]
350 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES...................................... 843,449 841,449
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,000]
360 DEPOT MAINTENANCE................................................. 78,126 78,126
370 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 247,677 244,177
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-3,500]
380 BASE SUPPORT...................................................... 1,103,442 1,096,442
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-5,500]
390 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 597,234 596,234
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS........................................ 506,840 506,840
410 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES...................................... 892,256 889,256
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-2,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,000]
420 CIVIL AIR PATROL.................................................. 24,981 24,981
450 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT............................................. 92,419 91,919
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
450A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............................................... 1,169,736 1,159,236
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-9,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,000]
SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES............................. 6,559,673 6,572,673

UNDISTRIBUTED
460 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -242,900
Civilian personnel underexecution............................. [-80,000]

[[Page H4658]]

Foreign Currency adjustments.................................. [-51,900]
Readiness support............................................. [221,500]
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-332,500]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -242,900

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE..................... 35,331,193 35,151,064

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES............................................. 1,719,467 1,719,467
020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS........................................ 211,132 211,132
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE................................................. 530,301 530,301
040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 85,672 84,672
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,000]
050 BASE SUPPORT...................................................... 367,966 365,466
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-2,500]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 2,914,538 2,911,038

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
060 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 59,899 59,899
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................ 14,509 14,509
080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)............................ 20,345 20,345
090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP).............................. 6,551 6,551
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES............ 101,304 101,304

UNDISTRIBUTED
110 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -13,400
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-13,400]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -13,400

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE.................... 3,015,842 2,998,942

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
OPERATING FORCES
010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS............................................... 3,367,729 3,366,729
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS........................................ 718,295 717,295
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE................................................. 1,528,695 1,528,695
040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION............... 137,604 133,604
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-4,000]
050 BASE SUPPORT...................................................... 581,536 569,036
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-12,500]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 6,333,859 6,315,359

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES
060 ADMINISTRATION.................................................... 27,812 27,812
070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING........................................ 31,188 30,688
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES........... 59,000 58,500

UNDISTRIBUTED
080 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -800
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-800]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -800

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG........................... 6,392,859 6,373,059

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATING FORCES
010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF............................................. 462,107 460,607
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES....................... 4,762,245 4,707,945
MSV--USSOCOM Maritime Support Vessel.......................... [-20,300]
NCR--USSOCOM National Capitol Region Office................... [-5,000]
POTFF--Human Performance...................................... [-23,300]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-26,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-5,000]
RSCC--Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers. [-3,600]
USSOCOM Flight Operations (Flight Hours)...................... [31,460]
USSOCOM Joint Special Operations University................... [-2,560]
SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES..................................... 5,224,352 5,168,552

TRAINING AND RECRUITING
030 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY.................................... 135,437 135,437
040 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY....................................... 80,082 80,082
050 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/TRAINING AND RECRUITING................ 371,620 371,620
SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING.............................. 587,139 587,139

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
060 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS........................................... 119,888 140,888
STARBASE...................................................... [21,000]

[[Page H4659]]

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY..................................... 556,493 556,493
090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY................................ 1,340,374 1,339,874
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
100 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY.................................. 633,300 613,300
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-20,000]
110 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY................................ 1,263,678 1,258,678
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-4,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-1,000]
130 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY..................................... 26,710 26,710
140 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY.......................................... 381,470 380,470
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
150 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY............................................ 194,520 183,020
Program decrease.............................................. [-10,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,500]
160 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE............................................ 21,485 21,485
170 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY............................... 544,786 523,786
Global Security Contingency Fund.............................. [-30,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
Warsaw Initiative Fund/Partnership For Peace.................. [10,000]
180 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE.......................................... 527,812 527,312
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
200 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION........................ 32,787 32,787
230 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY.......................... 2,566,424 2,551,924
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-6,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-8,500]
240 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY............................................ 416,644 415,144
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-500]
260 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT..................................... 186,987 106,391
Office of Economic Adjustment................................. [-80,596]
265 OFFICE OF NET ASSESSMENT.......................................... 18,944
Program increase.............................................. [10,000]
Transfer from line 270........................................ [8,944]
270 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE................................ 1,891,163 1,790,419
BRAC 2015 Round Planning and Analyses......................... [-4,800]
Corrosion Prevention Program Office........................... [5,000]
DOD Rewards Program Underexecution............................ [-4,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-51,500]
Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance..... [-36,500]
Transfer funding for Office of Net Assessment to new line 265. [-8,944]
280 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/ADMIN & SVC-WIDE ACTIVITIES............ 87,915 87,915
290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES.................................. 610,982 609,982
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-1,000]
290A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS............................................... 13,983,323 13,987,323
Classified adjustment......................................... [10,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-6,000]
SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES............ 25,386,741 25,172,845

UNDISTRIBUTED
300 UNDISTRIBUTED..................................................... -280,400
Civilian personnel underexecution............................. [-75,000]
Foreign Currency adjustments.................................. [-17,500]
Impact Aid.................................................... [25,000]
Unobligated balances.......................................... [-212,900]
SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED........................................ -280,400

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE.................. 31,198,232 30,648,136

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
010 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE................. 13,723 13,723
020 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID..................... 100,000 104,500
Humanitarian Mine Action...................................... [5,000]
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
030 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION...................................... 365,108 354,608
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-10,500]
040 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD.............................................. 212,875 209,375
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-3,500]
050 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY................................... 201,560 201,560
060 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY................................... 277,294 277,294
070 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE.............................. 408,716 408,716
080 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE................................ 8,547 8,547
090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES..................... 208,353 208,353
100 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND..................... 5,000 0
Program decrease.............................................. [-5,000]
110 SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL SPORTING COMPETITIONS, DEFENSE........... 10,000 5,200
Reduction in contracts for Other Services..................... [-500]
Unjustified program increase.................................. [-4,300]
SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS......................... 1,811,176 1,791,876

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS........................... 1,811,176 1,791,876

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE................................ 165,721,818 164,555,441
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page H4660]]

TITLE XLIV--MILITARY PERSONNEL

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2015 House
Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Personnel Appropriations..... 128,957,593 129,007,023
Air Force airborne warning and 12,200
control system personnel.........
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex [48,000]
Overhaul (RCOH)..................
Foreign Currency Adjustments..... [-193,200]
Military Personnel unobligated [-360,470]
balances.........................
Recalcualtion from CPI-1 to CPI.. [534,900]
Special training and exercises [8,000]
for National Guard State
Partnership Program..............
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund 6,236,092 6,237,092
Contributions........................
CVN 73 Refueling and Complex [1,000]
Overhaul (RCOH)..................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLV--OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2015 House
Item Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS........ 13,727 13,727
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY..... 13,727 13,727

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL). 61,717 61,717
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 61,717 61,717

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA).......... 44,293 44,293
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE- 44,293 44,293
WIDE.................................

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA.............. 1,114,731 1,214,731
Working Capital Fund, DECA......... [100,000]
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA..... 1,114,731 1,214,731

CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE................. 222,728 222,728
RDT&E................................... 595,913 595,913
PROCUREMENT............................. 10,227 10,227
TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS 828,868 828,868
DESTRUCTION..........................

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES,
DEF
DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG 719,096 719,096
ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE....................
DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM........... 101,591 101,591
TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG 820,687 820,687
ACTIVITIES, DEF......................

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............... 310,830 310,830
PROCUREMENT............................. 1,000 1,000
TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 311,830 311,830

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
IN-HOUSE CARE........................... 8,799,086 8,884,386
Implementation of Benefit Reform [-30,000]
Proposal...........................
Restoration of MHS Modernization... [92,000]
USSOCOM Behavioral Health and [23,300]
Warrior Care Management Program....
PRIVATE SECTOR CARE..................... 15,412,599 15,354,599
Implementation of Benefit Reform [-58,000]
Proposal...........................
CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT............. 2,462,096 2,462,096
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.................. 1,557,347 1,557,347
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES................... 366,223 366,223
EDUCATION AND TRAINING.................. 750,866 750,866
BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS.......... 1,683,694 1,683,694

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
R&D RESEARCH............................ 10,317 20,317
Surgical Critical Care Research.... [10,000]
R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT.............. 49,015 49,015
R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT................ 226,410 226,410
R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION............ 97,787 97,787
R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT............. 217,898 217,898
R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT.............. 38,075 38,075
R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT............ 15,092 15,092

PROCUREMENT
PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING................. 13,057 13,057

[[Page H4661]]

PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION........ 283,030 283,030
PROC THEATER MEDICAL INFORMATION PROGRAM 3,145 3,145
PROC IEHR............................... 9,181 9,181

UNDISTRIBUTED
UNDISTRIBUTED........................... -161,857 -586,557
Foreign Currency adjustments....... [-13,100]
Unobligated balances............... [-411,600]
TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM......... 31,833,061 31,445,661

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS........... 35,028,914 34,741,514
------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLVI--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (In Thousands of Dollars)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/Country and Budget House
Account Installation Project Title Request Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California
Army Concord Access Control Point...... 9,900 9,900
Army Concord General Purpose 5,300 5,300
Maintenance Shop.
Army Fort Irwin Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 45,000 45,000
Hangar.
Colorado
Army Fort Carson, Colorado Aircraft Maintenance 60,000 60,000
Hangar.
Army Fort Carson, Colorado Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 29,000 29,000
Hangar.
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
Army Guantanamo Bay Dining Facility........... 12,000 12,000
Army Guantanamo Bay Health Clinic............. 11,800 11,800
Army Guantanamo Bay High Value Detainee 0 69,000
Complex.
Hawaii
Army Fort Shafter Command and Control 96,000 83,000
Facility (Scif).
Japan
Army Kadena Ab Missile Magazine.......... 10,600 10,600
Kentucky
Army Blue Grass Army Depot Shipping and Receiving 0 15,000
Building.
Army Fort Campbell, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 23,000 23,000
Kentucky Hangar.
New York
Army Fort Drum, New York Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 27,000 27,000
Hangar.
Army U.S. Military Academy Cadet Barracks, Incr 3.... 58,000 58,000
Pennsylvania
Army Letterkenny Army Depot Rebuild Shop.............. 16,000 16,000
South Carolina
Army Fort Jackson Trainee Barracks Complex 52,000 52,000
3, Ph1.
Texas
Army Fort Hood Simulations Center........ 0 46,000
Virginia
Army Fort Lee Adv. Individual Training 0 86,000
Barracks Complex, Phase 3.
Army Joint Base Langley- Tactical Vehicle Hardstand 7,700 7,700
Eustis
Worldwide Unspecified
Army Unspecified Worldwide Host Nation Support Fy15.. 33,000 33,000
Locations
Army Unspecified Worldwide Minor Construction Fy15... 25,000 25,000
Locations
Army Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design Fy15.. 18,127 18,127
Locations
........................
Total Military Construction, Army 539,427 742,427
......................
Arizona
Navy Yuma Aviation Maintenance and 16,608 16,608
Support Complex.
Bahrain Island
Navy Sw Asia P-8a Hangar............... 27,826 27,826
California
Navy Bridgeport E-Lmr Communications 16,180 16,180
Towers.
Navy San Diego Steam Distribution System 47,110 47,110
Decentralization.
District of Columbia
Navy District of Columbia Electronics Science and 31,735 31,735
Technology Laboratory.
Djibouti
Navy Camp Lemonier, Entry Control Point....... 9,923 9,923
Djibouti
Florida
Navy Jacksonville Mh60 Parking Apron........ 8,583 8,583
Navy Jacksonville P-8a Runway Thresholds and 21,652 21,652
Taxiways.
Navy Mayport Lcs Operational Training 20,520 20,520
Facility.
Guam
Navy Joint Region Marianas Gse Shops at North Ramp... 21,880 21,880
Navy Joint Region Marianas Mwss Facilities at North 28,771 28,771
Ramp.
Hawaii
Navy Kaneohe Bay Facility Modifications for 51,182 51,182
Vmu, Mwsd, & Ch53e.

[[Page H4662]]

Navy Kaneohe Bay Road and Infrastructure 2,200 2,200
Improvements.
Navy Pearl Harbor Submarine Maneuvering Room 9,698 9,698
Trainer Facility.
Japan
Navy Iwakuni Security Mods Dpri Mc167-T 6,415 6,415
(Cvw-5 E2d Ea-18g).
Navy Kadena Ab Aircraft Maint Hangar 19,411 19,411
Alterations and Sap-F.
Navy MCAS Futenma Hangar & Rinse Facility 4,639 4,639
Modernizations.
Navy Okinawa Lhd Practice Site 35,685 35,685
Improvements.
Maryland
Navy Annapolis Center for Cyber Security 120,112 100,112
Studies Building.
Navy Indian Head Advanced Energetics 15,346 15,346
Research Lab Complex Ph 2.
Navy Patuxent River Atlantic Test Range 9,860 9,860
Facility.
Nevada
Navy Fallon Air Wing Training Facility 27,763 27,763
Navy Fallon Facility Alteration for F- 3,499 3,499
35 Training Mission.
North Carolina
Navy Cherry Point Marine Water Treatment Plant 41,588 41,588
Corps Air Station Replacement.
Pennsylvania
Navy Philadelphia Ohio Replacement Power & 23,985 23,985
Propulsion Facility.
South Carolina
Navy Charleston Nuclear Power Operational 35,716 35,716
Support Facility.
Spain
Navy Rota Ship Berthing Power 20,233 20,233
Upgrades.
Virginia
Navy Dahlgren Missile Support Facility.. 27,313 27,313
Navy Norfolk EOD Consolidated Ops & 39,274 39,274
Logistics Facilities.
Navy Portsmouth Submarine Maintenance 9,743 9,743
Facility.
Navy Quantico Ammunition Supply Point 12,613 12,613
Expansion.
Navy Yorktown Bachelor Enlisted Quarters 19,152 19,152
Navy Yorktown Fast Company Training 7,836 7,836
Facility.
Washington
Navy Bremerton Integrated Water Treatment 16,401 16,401
Syst. Dd 1, 2, & 5.
Navy Kitsap Explosives Handling Wharf 83,778 83,778
#2 (Inc).
Navy Port Angeles Tps Port Angeles Forward 20,638 20,638
Operating Location.
Navy Whidbey Island P-8a Aircraft Apron and 24,390 24,390
Supporting Facilities.
Worldwide Unspecified
Navy Unspecified Worldwide F-35c Facility Addition 16,594 16,594
Locations and Modification.
Navy Unspecified Worldwide F-35c Operational Training 22,391 22,391
Locations Facility.
Navy Unspecified Worldwide Mcon Design Funds......... 33,366 33,366
Locations
Navy Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 7,163 7,163
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Navy 1,018,772 998,772
......................
Alaska
AF Clear AFS Emergency Power Plant Fuel 11,500 11,500
Storage.
Arizona
AF Luke AFB F-35 Aircraft Mx Hangar-- 11,200 11,200
Sqdn #2.
AF Luke AFB F-35 Flightline Fillstands 15,600 15,600
Guam
AF Joint Region Marianas Guam Strike Fuel Systems 64,000 64,000
Maint.hangar Inc 2.
AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc--Combat Comm Infrastr 3,750 3,750
Facility.
AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc--Red Horse Logistics 3,150 3,150
Facility.
AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc--Satellite Fire 6,500 6,500
Station.
Kansas
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Adal Mobility Bag 2,300 2,300
Strg Expansion.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Adal Regional Mx 16,100 16,100
Tng Facility.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Alter Composite Mx 4,100 4,100
Shop.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Alter Taxiway 5,500 5,500
Foxtrot.
AF Mcconnell AFB KC-46a Fuselage Trainer... 6,400 6,400
Maryland
AF Fort Meade Cybercom Joint Operations 166,000 166,000
Center, Increment 2.
Massachusetts
AF Hanscom AFB Dormitory (72 Rm)......... 13,500 13,500
Nebraska
AF Offutt AFB Usstratcom Replacement 180,000 180,000
Facility- Incr 4.
Nevada
AF Nellis AFB F-22 Flight Simulator 14,000 14,000
Facility.
AF Nellis AFB F-35 Aircraft Mx Unit--4 31,000 31,000
Bay Hangar.
AF Nellis AFB F-35 Weapons School 8,900 8,900
Facility.
New Jersey
AF Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Fire Station.............. 5,900 5,900
Lakehurst
Oklahoma
AF Tinker AFB KC-46a Depot Maint Complex 48,000 48,000
Spt Infrastr.
AF Tinker AFB KC-46a Two-Bay Depot Mx 63,000 63,000
Hangar.
Texas
AF Joint Base San Antonio Fire Station.............. 5,800 5,800
United Kingdom

[[Page H4663]]

AF Croughton Raf Jiac Consolidation--Phase 92,223 92,223
1.
Worldwide Unspecified
AF Various Worldwide Planning and Design....... 10,738 10,738
Locations
AF Various Worldwide Unspecified Minor Military 22,613 22,613
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air Force 811,774 811,774
......................
Arizona
Def-Wide Fort Huachuca Jitc Building 52120 1,871 1,871
Renovation.
Australia
Def-Wide Geraldton Combined Communications 9,600 9,600
Gateway Geraldton.
Belgium
Def-Wide Brussels Brussells Elementary/High 41,626 41,626
School Replacement.
Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Facility 37,918 37,918
California
Def-Wide Camp Pendleton, SOF Comm/Elec Maintenance 11,841 11,841
California Facility.
Def-Wide Coronado SOF Logistics Support Unit 41,740 41,740
1 Ops Facility #1.
Def-Wide Coronado SOF Support Activity Ops 28,600 28,600
Facility #2.
Def-Wide Lemoore Replace Fuel Storage & 52,500 52,500
Distribution Fac..
Colorado
Def-Wide Peterson AFB Dental Clinic Replacement. 15,200 15,200
Conus
Def-Wide Various Locations East Coast Missile Site 0 20,000
Planning and Design.
Conus Classified
Def-Wide Classified Location SOF Skills Training 53,073 53,073
Facility.
Georgia
Def-Wide Hunter Army Airfield SOF Company Operations 7,692 7,692
Facility.
Def-Wide Robins AFB Replace Hydrant Fuel 19,900 19,900
System.
Germany
Def-Wide Rhine Ordnance Medical Center Replacement 259,695 189,695
Barracks Incr 4.
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
Def-Wide Guantanamo Bay Replace Fuel Tank......... 11,100 11,100
Def-Wide Guantanamo Bay W.t. Sampson E/M and Hs 65,190 65,190
Consolid./Replacement.
Hawaii
Def-Wide Joint Base Pearl Replace Fuel Tanks........ 3,000 3,000
Harbor-Hickam
Def-Wide Joint Base Pearl Upgrade Fire Supression & 49,900 49,900
Harbor-Hickam Ventilation Sys..
Japan
Def-Wide Misawa Ab Edgren High School 37,775 37,775
Renovation.
Def-Wide Okinawa Killin Elementary 71,481 71,481
Replacement/Renovation.
Def-Wide Okinawa Kubasaki High School 99,420 99,420
Replacement/Renovation.
Def-Wide Sasebo E.j. King High School 37,681 37,681
Replacement/Renovation.
Kentucky
Def-Wide Fort Campbell, SOF System Integration 18,000 18,000
Kentucky Maintenance Office Fac.
Maryland
Def-Wide Fort Meade NSAW Campus Feeders Phase 54,207 54,207
1.
Def-Wide Fort Meade NSAW Recapitalize Building 45,521 45,521
#1/Site M Inc 3.
Def-Wide Joint Base Andrews Construct Hydrant Fuel 18,300 18,300
System.
Michigan
Def-Wide Selfridge ANGB Replace Fuel Distribution 35,100 35,100
Facilities.
Mississippi
Def-Wide Stennis SOF Applied Instruction 10,323 10,323
Facility.
Def-Wide Stennis SOF Land Acquisition 17,224 17,224
Western Maneuver Area.
Nevada
Def-Wide Fallon SOF Tactical Ground Mob. 20,241 20,241
Vehicle Maint Fac..
New Mexico
Def-Wide Cannon AFB SOF Squadron Operations 23,333 23,333
Facility (Sts).
North Carolina
Def-Wide Camp Lejeune, North Lejeune High School 41,306 41,306
Carolina Addition/Renovation.
Def-Wide Camp Lejeune, North SOF Intel/Ops Expansion... 11,442 11,442
Carolina
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Battalion Operations 37,074 37,074
Facility.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Tactical Equipment 8,000 8,000
Maintenance Facility.
Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Training Command 48,062 48,062
Building.
Def-Wide Seymour Johnson AFB Replace Hydrant Fuel 8,500 8,500
System.
South Carolina
Def-Wide Beaufort Replace Fuel Distibution 40,600 40,600
Facilities.
South Dakota
Def-Wide Ellsworth AFB Construct Hydrant System.. 8,000 8,000
Texas
Def-Wide Fort Bliss Hospital Replacement Incr 131,500 201,500
6.
Def-Wide Joint Base San Antonio Medical Clinic Replacement 38,300 38,300
Virginia
Def-Wide Craney Island Replace & Alter Fuel 36,500 36,500
Distibution Facilities.
Def-Wide Def Distribution Depot Replace Access Control 5,700 5,700
Richmond Point.
Def-Wide Fort Belvoir Parking Lot............... 7,239 7,239
Def-Wide Joint Base Langley- Hopsital Addition/Cup 41,200 41,200
Eustis Replacement.
Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary SOF Human Performance 11,200 11,200
Base Little Creek-- Center.
Story
Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary SOF Indoor Dynamic Range.. 14,888 14,888
Base Little Creek--
Story
Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary SOF Mobile Comm Det 13,500 13,500
Base Little Creek-- Support Facility.
Story

[[Page H4664]]

Def-Wide Pentagon Redundant Chilled Water 15,100 15,100
Loop.
Worldwide Unspecified
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Contingency Construction.. 9,000 0
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Ecip Design............... 10,000 10,000
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Energy Conservation 150,000 150,000
Locations Investment Program.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Exercise Related Minor 8,581 8,581
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design....... 745 745
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design....... 38,704 18,704
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design....... 1,183 1,183
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design....... 42,387 42,387
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design....... 599 599
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design....... 24,425 4,425
Locations
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 5,932 5,932
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 6,846 6,846
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 10,334 10,334
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 2,700 2,700
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 2,000 2,000
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 4,100 4,100
Locations Construction.
Def-Wide Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor Milcon.. 2,994 2,994
Locations
Def-Wide Various Worldwide Planning and Design....... 24,197 24,197
Locations
........................
Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide 2,061,890 2,032,890
......................
Kentucky
Chem Demil Blue Grass Army Depot Ammunition 38,715 38,715
Demilitarization Ph Xv.
........................
Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense 38,715 38,715
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
NATO NATO Security NATO Security Investment 199,700 199,700
Investment Program Program.
........................
Total NATO Security Investment Program 199,700 199,700
......................
Delaware
Army NG Dagsboro National Guard Vehicle 0 10,800
Maintenance Shop.
Maine
Army NG Augusta National Guard Reserve 30,000 30,000
Center.
Maryland
Army NG Havre DE Grace National Guard Readiness 12,400 12,400
Center.
Montana
Army NG Helena National Guard Readiness 38,000 38,000
Center Add/Alt.
New Mexico
Army NG Alamogordo National Guard Readiness 0 5,000
Center.
North Dakota
Army NG Valley City National Guard Vehicle 10,800 10,800
Maintenance Shop.
Vermont
Army NG North Hyde Park National Guard Vehicle 4,400 4,400
Maintenance Shop.
Washington
Army NG Yakima Enlisted Barracks, 0 19,000
Transient Training.
Worldwide Unspecified
Army NG Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design....... 17,600 17,600
Locations
Army NG Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 13,720 13,720
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Army National Guard 126,920 161,720
......................
California
Army Res Fresno Army Reserve Center/AMSA.. 22,000 22,000
Army Res March (Riverside) Army Reserve Center....... 0 25,000
Colorado
Army Res Fort Carson, Colorado Training Building Addition 5,000 5,000
Illinois
Army Res Arlington Heights Army Reserve Center....... 0 26,000

[[Page H4665]]

Mississippi
Army Res Starkville Army Reserve Center....... 0 9,300
New Jersey
Army Res Joint Base Mcguire-Dix- Army Reserve Center....... 26,000 26,000
Lakehurst
New York
Army Res Mattydale Army Reserve Center/AMSA.. 23,000 23,000
Virginia
Army Res Fort Lee Tass Training Center...... 16,000 16,000
Worldwide Unspecified
Army Res Unspecified Worldwide Planning and Design....... 8,337 8,337
Locations
Army Res Unspecified Worldwide Unspecified Minor 3,609 3,609
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Army Reserve 103,946 164,246
......................
Pennsylvania
N/MC Res Pittsburgh Reserve Training Center-- 17,650 17,650
Pittsburgh, PA.
Washington
N/MC Res Whidbey Island C-40 Aircraft Maintenance 27,755 27,755
Hangar.
Worldwide Unspecified
N/MC Res Unspecified Worldwide Mcnr Planning & Design.... 2,123 2,123
Locations
N/MC Res Unspecified Worldwide Mcnr Unspecified Minor 4,000 4,000
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve 51,528 51,528
......................
Connecticut
Air NG Bradley IAP Construct C-130 Fuel Cell 16,306 16,306
and Corrosion Contr.
Iowa
Air NG Des Moines Map Remotely Piloted Aircraft 8,993 8,993
and Targeting Group.
Michigan
Air NG W. K. Kellog Regional Rpa Beddown............... 6,000 6,000
Airport
New Hampshire
Air NG Pease International KC-46a Adal Airfield 7,100 7,100
Trade Port Pavements & Hydrant Syst.
Air NG Pease International KC-46a Adal Fuel Cell 16,800 16,800
Trade Port Building 253.
Air NG Pease International KC-46a Adal Maint Hangar 18,002 18,002
Trade Port Building 254.
Pennsylvania
Air NG Willow Grove Arf Rpa Operations Center..... 5,662 5,662
Worldwide Unspecified
Air NG Various Worldwide Planning and Design....... 7,700 7,700
Locations
Air NG Various Worldwide Unspecified Minor 8,100 8,100
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air National Guard 94,663 94,663
......................
Georgia
AF Res Robins AFB Afrc Consolidated Mission 27,700 27,700
Complex, Ph I.
North Carolina
AF Res Seymour Johnson AFB KC-135 Tanker Parking 9,800 9,800
Apron Expansion.
Texas
AF Res Fort Worth EOD Facility.............. 3,700 3,700
Worldwide Unspecified
AF Res Various Worldwide Planning and Design....... 6,892 6,892
Locations
AF Res Various Worldwide Unspecified Minor Military 1,400 1,400
Locations Construction.
........................
Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve 49,492 49,492
......................
Illinois
FH Con Army Rock Island Family Housing New 19,500 19,500
Construction.
Korea
FH Con Army Camp Walker Family Housing New 57,800 57,800
Construction.
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Army Unspecified Worldwide Family Housing P & D...... 1,309 1,309
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Army 78,609 78,609
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings............... 14,136 14,136
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Leased Housing............ 112,504 112,504
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 65,245 65,245
Locations Property Facilities.
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Management Account........ 43,480 43,480
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Management Account........ 3,117 3,117
Locations

[[Page H4666]]

FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Military Housing 20,000 20,000
Locations Privitization Initiative.
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous............. 700 700
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Services.................. 9,108 9,108
Locations
FH Ops Army Unspecified Worldwide Utilities................. 82,686 82,686
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army 350,976 350,976
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account....... 38,543 38,543
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Housing Privatization..... 40,761 40,761
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Leasing................... 43,651 43,651
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance............... 99,934 99,934
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Management Account........ 47,834 47,834
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous Account..... 1,993 1,993
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Services Account.......... 12,709 12,709
Locations
FH Ops AF Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account......... 42,322 42,322
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force 327,747 327,747
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Design.................... 472 472
Locations
FH Con Navy Unspecified Worldwide Improvements.............. 15,940 15,940
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps 16,412 16,412
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account....... 17,881 17,881
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Leasing................... 65,999 65,999
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 97,612 97,612
Locations Property.
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Management Account........ 55,124 55,124
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Miscellaneous Account..... 366 366
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Privatization Support 27,876 27,876
Locations Costs.
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Services Account.......... 18,079 18,079
Locations
FH Ops Navy Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account......... 71,092 71,092
Locations
........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps 354,029 354,029
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account....... 3,362 3,362
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account....... 20 20
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Furnishings Account....... 746 746
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Leasing................... 11,179 11,179
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Leasing................... 42,083 42,083
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 2,128 2,128
Locations Property.
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Maintenance of Real 344 344
Locations Property.
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Management Account........ 378 378
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Services Account.......... 31 31
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account......... 170 170
Locations
FH Ops DW Unspecified Worldwide Utilities Account......... 659 659
Locations

[[Page H4667]]

........................
Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide 61,100 61,100
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
FHIF Unspecified Worldwide Family Housing Improvement 1,662 1,662
Locations Fund.
........................
Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund 1,662 1,662
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC Base Realignment & Base Realignment and 84,417 84,417
Closure, Army Closure.
BRAC Base Realignment & Base Realignment & Closure 57,406 57,406
Closure, Navy
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Dod BRAC Activities--Air 90,976 90,976
Locations Force.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-100: Planing, Design 7,682 7,682
Locations and Management.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-101: Various Locations 21,416 21,416
Locations
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-138: NAS Brunswick, ME 904 904
Locations
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-157: Mcsa Kansas City, 40 40
Locations MO.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-172: NWS Seal Beach, 6,066 6,066
Locations Concord, CA.
BRAC Unspecified Worldwide Don-84: JRB Willow Grove & 1,178 1,178
Locations Cambria Reg Ap.
........................
Total Base Realignment and Closure Account 270,085 270,085
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
PYS Unspecified Worldwide 42 Usc 3374............... 0 -100,000
Locations
PYS Unspecified Worldwide Army...................... 0 -79,577
Locations
PYS Unspecified Worldwide NATO Security Investment 0 -25,000
Locations Program.
........................
Total Prior Year Savings 0 -204,577
......................
Worldwide Unspecified
GR Unspecified Worldwide General Reductions........ 0 -69,000
Locations
........................
Total General Reductions 0 -69,000
......................
Total Military Construction 6,557,447 6,532,970
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TITLE XLVII--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS (In Thousands
of Dollars)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2015 House
Program Request Authorized
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
Energy And Water Development, And Related
Agencies
Appropriation Summary:
Energy Programs
Nuclear Energy........................ 104,000 104,000

Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National nuclear security
administration:
Weapons activities.................. 8,314,902 8,462,602
Defense nuclear nonproliferation.... 1,555,156 1,565,156
Naval reactors...................... 1,377,100 1,387,100
Federal salaries and expenses....... 410,842 386,842
Total, National nuclear security 11,658,000 11,801,700
administration...........................

Environmental and other defense
activities:
Defense environmental cleanup....... 5,327,538 4,870,538
Other defense activities............ 753,000 758,300
Total, Environmental & other defense 6,080,538 5,628,838
activities...............................
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities... 17,738,538 17,430,538
Total, Discretionary Funding.............. 17,842,538 17,534,538

[[Page H4668]]

Nuclear Energy
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security.... 104,000 104,000

Weapons Activities
Directed stockpile work
Life extension programs
B61 Life extension program............ 643,000 643,000
W76 Life extension program............ 259,168 273,768
W88 Alt 370........................... 165,400 166,600
Cruise missile warhead life extension 9,418 17,018
program..............................
Total, Life extension programs............ 1,076,986 1,100,386

Stockpile systems
B61 Stockpile systems................. 109,615 109,615
W76 Stockpile systems................. 45,728 45,728
W78 Stockpile systems................. 62,703 66,403
W80 Stockpile systems................. 70,610 70,610
B83 Stockpile systems................. 63,136 63,136
W87 Stockpile systems................. 91,255 91,255
W88 Stockpile systems................. 88,060 88,060
Total, Stockpile systems.................. 531,107 534,807

Weapons dismantlement and disposition
Operations and maintenance............ 30,008 30,008

Stockpile services
Production support.................... 350,942 363,242
Research and development support...... 29,649 29,649
R&D certification and safety.......... 201,479 212,479
Management, technology, and production 241,805 241,805
Plutonium sustainment................. 144,575 172,875
Tritium readiness..................... 140,053 140,053
Total, Stockpile services................. 1,108,503 1,160,103
Total, Directed stockpile work............ 2,746,604 2,825,304

Campaigns:
Science campaign
Advanced certification................ 58,747 58,747
Primary assessment technologies....... 112,000 112,000
Dynamic materials properties.......... 117,999 117,999
Advanced radiography.................. 79,340 79,340
Secondary assessment technologies..... 88,344 88,344
Total, Science campaign................... 456,430 456,430

Engineering campaign
Enhanced surety....................... 52,003 54,403
Weapon systems engineering assessment 20,832 20,832
technology...........................
Nuclear survivability................. 25,371 25,371
Enhanced surveillance................. 37,799 41,399
Total, Engineering campaign............... 136,005 142,005

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and
high yield campaign
Ignition.............................. 77,994 77,994
Support of other stockpile programs... 23,598 23,598
Diagnostics, cryogenics and 61,297 61,297
experimental support.................
Pulsed power inertial confinement 5,024 5,024
fusion...............................
Joint program in high energy density 9,100 9,100
laboratory plasmas...................
Facility operations and target 335,882 335,882
production...........................
Total, Inertial confinement fusion and 512,895 512,895
high yield campaign......................

Advanced simulation and computing 610,108 610,108
campaign...............................

Nonnuclear Readiness Campaign........... 125,909 125,909
Total, Campaigns.......................... 1,841,347 1,847,347

Readiness in technical base and facilities
(RTBF)
Operations of facilities
Kansas City Plant....................... 125,000 125,000
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 71,000 71,000
Los Alamos National Laboratory........ 198,000 198,000
Nevada National Security Site......... 89,000 89,000
Pantex................................ 75,000 75,000
Sandia National Laboratory............ 106,000 106,000
Savannah River Site................... 81,000 81,000
Y-12 National security complex........ 151,000 151,000
Total, Operations of facilities........... 896,000 896,000

Program readiness....................... 136,700 136,700
Material recycle and recovery........... 138,900 138,900
Containers.............................. 26,000 26,000

[[Page H4669]]

Storage................................. 40,800 40,800
Maintenance and repair of facilities.... 205,000 220,000
Recapitalization........................ 209,321 248,321
Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and 756,721 810,721
facilities...............................

Construction:
15-D-613 Emergency Operations Center, 2,000 2,000
Y-12.................................
15-D-612 Emergency Operations Center, 2,000 2,000
LLNL.................................
15-D-611 Emergency Operations Center, 4,000 4,000
SNL..................................
15-D-301 HE Science & Engineering 11,800 11,800
Facility, PX.........................
15-D-302, TA-55 Reinvestment project, 16,062 16,062
Phase 3, LANL........................
12-D-301 TRU waste facilities, LANL... 6,938 6,938
11-D-801 TA-55 Reinvestment project 10,000 10,000
Phase 2, LANL........................
07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste 15,000 15,000
treatment facility upgrade project,
LANL.................................
06-D-141 PED/Construction, Uranium 335,000 335,000
Capabilities Replacement Project Y-12
Total, Construction....................... 402,800 402,800
Total, Readiness in technical base and 2,055,521 2,109,521
facilities...............................

Secure transportation asset
Operations and equipment................ 132,851 132,851
Program direction....................... 100,962 100,962
Total, Secure transportation asset........ 233,813 233,813

Nuclear counterterrorism incident response 173,440 182,440

Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation 76,901 76,901
Programs.................................

Site stewardship
Environmental projects and operations... 53,000 53,000
Nuclear materials integration........... 16,218 16,218
Minority serving institution 13,231 13,231
partnerships program...................
Total, Site stewardship................... 82,449 82,449

Defense nuclear security
Operations and maintenance.............. 618,123 618,123
Total, Defense nuclear security........... 618,123 618,123

Information technology and cybersecurity.. 179,646 179,646

Legacy contractor pensions................ 307,058 307,058
Total, Weapons Activities................. 8,314,902 8,462,602

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs
Global threat reduction initiative...... 333,488 413,488

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
Operations and maintenance............ 360,808 430,808

Nonproliferation and international 141,359 177,759
security...............................

International material protection and 305,467 129,067
cooperation............................

Fissile materials disposition
U.S. surplus fissile materials
disposition
Operations and maintenance
U.S. plutonium disposition........ 85,000 85,000
U.S. uranium disposition.......... 25,000 25,000
Total, Operations and maintenance......... 110,000 110,000
Construction:
99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel 196,000 196,000
fabrication facility, Savannah
River, SC........................
99-D-141-02 Waste Solidification 5,125 5,125
Building, Savannah River, SC.....
Total, Construction....................... 201,125 201,125
Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials 311,125 311,125
disposition..............................
Russian surplus fillile materials
disposition
Total, Fissile materials disposition...... 311,125 311,125
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 1,452,247 1,462,247
Programs.................................

Legacy contractor pensions................ 102,909 102,909
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation... 1,555,156 1,565,156

Naval Reactors
Naval reactors operations and 412,380 422,380
infrastructure...........................
Naval reactors development................ 425,700 425,700
Ohio replacement reactor systems 156,100 156,100
development..............................
S8G Prototype refueling................... 126,400 126,400
Program direction......................... 46,600 46,600
Construction:
15-D-904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 400 400
3......................................

[[Page H4670]]

15-D-903 KL Fire System Upgrade......... 600 600
15-D-902 KS Engineroom team trainer 1,500 1,500
facility...............................
15-D-901 KS Central office building and 24,000 24,000
prototype staff facility...............
14-D-901 Spent fuel handling 141,100 141,100
recapitalization project, NRF..........
13-D-905 Remote-handled low-level waste 14,420 14,420
facility, INL..........................
13-D-904 KS Radiological work and 20,100 20,100
storage building, KSO..................
10-D-903, Security upgrades, KAPL....... 7,400 7,400
08-D-190 Expended Core Facility M-290 400 400
receiving/discharge station, Naval
Reactor Facility, ID...................
Total, Construction....................... 209,920 209,920
Total, Naval Reactors..................... 1,377,100 1,387,100

Federal Salaries And Expenses
Program direction......................... 410,842 386,842
Total, Office Of The Administrator........ 410,842 386,842

Defense Environmental Cleanup
Closure sites:
Closure sites administration............ 4,889 4,889

Hanford site:
River corridor and other cleanup 332,788 332,788
operations.............................
Central plateau remediation:
Central plateau remediation........... 474,292 474,292
Construction:
15-D-401 Containerized sludge (Rl- 26,290 26,290
0012)................................
Total, Central plateau remediation........ 500,582 500,582
Richland community and regulatory 14,701 14,701
support................................
Total, Hanford site....................... 848,071 848,071

Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho cleanup and waste disposition..... 364,293 364,293
Idaho community and regulatory support.. 2,910 2,910
Total, Idaho National Laboratory.......... 367,203 367,203

NNSA sites
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.. 1,366 1,366
Nevada.................................. 64,851 64,851
Sandia National Laboratories............ 2,801 2,801
Los Alamos National Laboratory.......... 196,017 196,017
Construction:
15-D-406 Hexavalent chromium D & D (Vl- 28,600 28,600
Lanl-0030)...........................
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites.... 293,635 293,635

Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear facility D & D
OR Nuclear facility D & D............. 73,155 73,155
Construction:
14-D-403 Outfall 200 Mercury 9,400 9,400
Treatment Facility.................
Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D.......... 82,555 82,555

U233 Disposition Program................ 41,626 41,626

OR cleanup and disposition:
OR cleanup and disposition............ 71,137 71,137
Construction:
15-D-405--Sludge Buildout........... 4,200 4,200
Total, OR cleanup and disposition......... 75,337 75,337

OR reservation community and regulatory 4,365 4,365
support..................................
Solid waste stabilization and disposition, 3,000 3,000
Oak Ridge technology development.........
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation.............. 206,883 206,883

Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment and immobilization plant
01-D-416 A-D/ORP-0060 / Major 575,000 575,000
construction.........................
01-D-16E Pretreatment facility........ 115,000 115,000
Total, Waste treatment and immobilization 690,000 690,000
plant....................................

Tank farm activities
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization 522,000 522,000
and disposition......................
Construction:
15-D-409 Low Activity Waste 23,000 23,000
Pretreatment System, Hanford.......
Total, Tank farm activities............... 545,000 545,000
Total, Office of River protection......... 1,235,000 1,235,000

Savannah River sites:
Savannah River risk management 416,276 416,276
operations.............................
SR community and regulatory support..... 11,013 11,013

[[Page H4671]]

Radioactive liquid tank waste:
Radioactive liquid tank waste 553,175 553,175
stabilization and disposition........
Construction:
15-D-402--Saltstone Disposal Unit #6 34,642 34,642
05-D-405 Salt waste processing 135,000 135,000
facility, Savannah River...........
Total, Construction....................... 169,642 169,642
Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste...... 722,817 722,817
Total, Savannah River site................ 1,150,106 1,150,106

Waste isolation pilot plant............... 216,020 216,020

Program direction......................... 280,784 280,784
Program support........................... 14,979 14,979

Safeguards and Security:
Oak Ridge Reservation................... 16,382 16,382
Paducah................................. 7,297 7,297
Portsmouth.............................. 8,492 8,492
Richland/Hanford Site................... 63,668 63,668
Savannah River Site..................... 132,196 132,196
Waste Isolation Pilot Project........... 4,455 4,455
West Valley............................. 1,471 1,471
Technology development.................... 13,007 19,007
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup... 4,864,538 4,870,538

Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution.. 463,000 0

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup...... 5,327,538 4,870,538

Other Defense Activities
Specialized security activities........... 202,152 207,452

Environment, health, safety and security
Environment, health, safety and security 118,763 118,763
Program direction....................... 62,235 62,235
Total, Environment, Health, safety and 180,998 180,998
security.................................

Independent enterprise assessments
Independent enterprise assessments...... 24,068 24,068
Program direction....................... 49,466 49,466
Total, Independent enterprise assessments. 73,534 73,534

Office of Legacy Management
Legacy management....................... 158,639 158,639
Program direction....................... 13,341 13,341
Total, Office of Legacy Management........ 171,980 171,980

Defense-related activities
Defense related administrative support
Chief financial officer................. 46,877 46,877
Chief information officer............... 71,959 71,959
Total, Defense related administrative 118,836 118,836
support..................................

Office of hearings and appeals............ 5,500 5,500
Subtotal, Other defense activities........ 753,000 758,300
Total, Other Defense Activities........... 753,000 758,300
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Acting CHAIR. No further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall
be in order except those printed in House Report 113-455. Each such
further amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the
report, by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered read,
shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject
to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for the division of
the question.

Amendment No. 1 Offered by Mr. Blumenauer

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 1
printed in House Report 113-455.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of subtitle D of title I, add the following new
section:

SEC. 136. PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN RADARS FOR F-15C/D AIRCRAFT.

(a) In General.--The Secretary of the Air Force shall
procure not fewer than 10 active electronically scanned array
radars for F-15C/D aircraft of the Air National Guard.
(b) Funding.--
(1) Increase.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the
funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be
appropriated in section 101 for aircraft procurement, Air
Force, as specified in the corresponding funding table in
section 4101, for F-15 APG-63(V)3 upgrades (Line 025) is
hereby increased by $100,000,000.
(2) Offset.--Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the
funding tables in division D, the amounts authorized to be
appropriated in division C for atomic energy defense
activities, as specified in the corresponding funding table
in section 4701, are reduced for the following purposes
relating to weapons activities by the following amounts:
(A) W76 Life extension program, by $7,900,000.
(B) W88 Alt 370, by $1,200,000.
(C) Cruise missile warhead life extension program, by
$7,600,000.
(D) W78 Stockpile systems, by $3,700,000.
(E) Production support, by $12,300,000.
(F) Plutonium sustainment, by $28,300,000.
(G) Recapitalization, by $39,000,000.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman

[[Page H4672]]

from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Oregon.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, as I have been listening to the debate
this evening following the process, I, too, would offer my
congratulations to the chair of the committee and the committee itself
dealing with a very difficult situation. There are lots of pressures.
They are not just faceless special interests, but we are dealing with
businesses, with unions, with the military itself, concerns for their
family, the armed services, and the traditions. All of these things
make for a very complicated situation.
But I relate to something Mr. Smith said a moment ago, the ranking
member, talking about the really hard questions are not really being
addressed. We are sort of pushing them down the road when the
administration and the Pentagon offered them forward.
I am concerned that we have yet to come to grips with the costs of
between a half-trillion and two-thirds of a trillion dollars for our
nuclear capacity over the next 10 years. Well, I am offering tonight an
easy opportunity to deal with something that can make a big difference
to support thousands of brave men and women who make up the Air
National Guard, who have proven themselves, especially over the last 13
years, answering the call of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition
to protecting the homeland without wavering, they have responded time
and time again when disaster strikes.
But I want to focus on one particular area dealing with the Air Guard
and Reserves' capacity to be able to meet their challenges. My
amendment would call the question of whether the House is ready to make
a modest change in other funding levels to support the Air Guard.
The amendment would authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to
procure 10 Active Electronically Scanned Array radar upgrades for the
Air Guard's F-15 fleet. We have around the country people who are
relying upon a variation of the oldest radars, which are late 1970s
technology that went out of production in 1986. It limits their
capacity to meet even the most basic of threats and has serious
maintenance--not just capacity--but maintenance and operational
problems.
I would like to include for the Record this letter of support from
the National Guard Association of the United States, which shows why
they so strongly support this amendment.

National Guard Association

of the United States,

Washington, DC, May 19, 2014.
Hon. Earl Blumenauer,
Longworth House Office Building,
Washington, DC.
Dear Congressman Blumenauer: On behalf of the members of
the National Guard Association of the United States (NGAUS),
I would like to thank you for introducing an amendment to the
National Defense Authorization Act of 2015 to increase
funding for Air National Guard (ANG) F-15 Active Electronic
Scanned Array (AESA) radar upgrade.
As you may know, the Air Force currently possesses 248 F-
15C/D aircraft worldwide, with the ANG maintaining 130 (52
percent) of those aircraft. Of the 130 F-15 aircraft the ANG
maintains, 74 possess the oldest APG-63v(0) radar system.
This V(0) radar is a mechanically scanned system and has
significant limitations in capability against most threats
across the globe.
Upgrading the F-15 with the APG-63(V)3 AESA radar provides
a significant technological advantage for both homeland
defense and world-wide operations.
Additionally, the V(3) is dramatically easier and cheaper
to maintain due to its sold state electronics. Studies
indicate that the AESA radar generates approximately 800
percent more reliability than the V(0) radar. It also allows
for true and effective multi-track and attack capability and
increased capability against advanced electronic attack and
small radar cross section targets.
Though the President's budget this year provides for $32.5
million for ANG radar upgrades, NGAUS believes additional
funding on top of this request will help to maintain parity
amongst the Combat Air Force's F-15 in the Active and the
National Guard. Considering the Air Force will have to
maintain F-15s for the foreseeable future, we believe it is
paramount to ensure additional upgrades to the ANG fleet.
NGAUS supports your efforts in the House to increase
funding for ANG F-15 AESA radar upgrades.
Thank you for your leadership and strong support on this
issue and of our National Guard.
Sincerely,

Gus Hargett,

Major General, USA, (Ret),
NGAUS President.

Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, an upgrade for these 10 operating
systems would not only provide significant technological advantage for
both homeland defense and worldwide operation, but it would--and this
is very important--it is actually going to save money over the next 10
years. It is much easier and cheaper than to maintain the current
outmoded radars. A small, upfront investment makes our F-15 fighter
pilots safer and more effective and saves money in the long run.
Looking for offsets is obviously difficult to do, but what we have
done is identify modest reductions in areas that are already far in
excess of what the President has requested. In some cases, they are
even an additional increment above that which has been offered by the
committee in its proposal.
I would hope that the House would approve this modest reduction in
these seven accounts. It is not going to undercut our nuclear
deterrent, but it will make a huge difference for the men and women who
serve in the Air National Guard in terms of their safety, their
effectiveness, and in the long run will save money.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the
amendment.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 2 minutes.
Mr. Chairman, this amendment is part of a long running effort to
reduce funding for an already chronically underfunded nuclear
deterrent. Advocates of unilateral U.S. disarmament try unsuccessfully
each year to cut nuclear weapons funding. We see it on the NDAA, we see
it on the appropriations bills, and we see it in stand-alone bills.
For instance, in February, the gentleman from Oregon introduced H.R.
4107, the REIN-IN Act. The bill would devastate our nuclear deterrent
by mandating the following: reducing the number of ICBMs from 450 to
150 and delay development of follow-on systems, cutting the number of
ballistic missile submarines from 12 to eight, delaying development of
the nuclear-capable, long-range bomber, prohibiting the F-35 from being
nuclear capable, and terminating several nuclear infrastructure
modernization construction projects.
The amendment we are considering today is part of the broader effort
that you will see reflected in that bill. It is part of the Disarm-
America agenda that is so dangerous to U.S. nuclear security and our
international stability. Let's call this amendment what it is: a sly
attempt to undercut and undermine our nuclear deterrent by pitting us
against the Air National Guard. It is a unilateral disarmament, and I
stand here in firm opposition.
The offset of this amendment is also bad policy. Over the last 3
years, the Department of Energy's nuclear weapons program is already a
total of $2 billion short of the funding the administration committed
in 2010. The administration committed to this funding to win
ratification of the New START treaty. Now that it is a treaty, it is
unwilling to request the money the nuclear deterrent needs.
We must hold the administration to its commitment, provide the money,
and oppose this amendment. I strongly urge my colleagues to vote ``no''
on this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. May I inquire as to the amount of time I have
remaining?
The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Oregon has 1 minute
remaining.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio
(Mr. Turner), my friend and colleague.
Mr. TURNER. I want to join Chairman Rogers in his effort to oppose
this amendment.
Mr. Chair, as we know, this is one of the annual reoccurring
Representative Blumenauer's reductions of nuclear weapons efforts. And
I would support reducing spending on nuclear weapons if we were talking
about Mr. Putin's reducing his funding on nuclear weapons or Russia
reducing their funding on nuclear weapons, which we know they are not
going to do.
So this is a continued unfortunate exercise of discussing unilateral
reductions in the United States' funding its

[[Page H4673]]

nuclear weapon deterrent, which is a dangerous thing to do, especially
as Mr. Putin is continuing his efforts to escalate conflict throughout
the world and also is looking to increase his overall nuclear weapons
capability.
Now, the other thing is, this isn't even needed. The bill already
provides the budget request level of $117.5 million to purchase 17 of
these radars that would be purchased under this amendment, 15 of which
will go to the Air Guard, and it is certainly a prudent and efficient
investment, but, additionally, the HASC bill also funds the National
Guard and Reserve equipment account, which, if the Air Guard really
thought they needed these radars, they could go buy them from that
without turning to our nuclear deterrent.
So why would this be damaging? Well, already, the DOD nuclear
activities are $2 billion short of their 2010 commitment, and our
deferred maintenance across the DOD, the deferred maintenance--stuff
that we need to be fixing that we are not fixing--has a backlog of $3.5
billion, and this amendment would take another $39 million out of that
effort to satisfy that backlog.
This should, as Chairman Rogers said, be seen exactly for what it is,
another effort to unilaterally reduce the nuclear deterrent of the
United States. I think this would be a better focus if it was focused
on Russia, and it certainly does nothing to improve the overall
capability of our Air National Guard. They have all the resources that
they would need.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. It is laughable to say that our Air National Guard
has all the resources they need. It is not true. And I have entered
into the Record argument to the contrary from the people who are
actually administering it.
I am happy to debate our REIN-IN legislation, which would be $100
billion. We have far more than we need and can afford. But what I am
talking about is $100 million for items that are specified that are
modest reductions that aren't going to cripple us and will give the Air
National Guard a modern, updated radar system that makes them safer and
more efficient.
This is an example of the tradeoffs, sadly, that are not part of this
bill that we do need to make. Sooner or later, the day of reckoning
will come. In the meantime, this is a small gesture to help approve the
capacity of the Air National Guard, and I urge its adoption.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I would like to yield 15 seconds
to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner) to respond.
Mr. TURNER. As Mr. Blumenauer knows, my comment is that they have all
the resources they need to make a decision to purchase these radars.
Everyone knows that this bill is underfunded, and it certainly
underfunded nuclear weapons, and your bill, your amendment would only
further reduce our nuclear weapons capability.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas
(Mr. Thornberry).
Mr. THORNBERRY. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Chairman, the centerpiece of our national security is our nuclear
deterrent, and we have neglected it terribly for years, both in the
administration and in Congress, and we have got a lot of catching up to
do.
So as the gentleman from Ohio said and the administration itself
says, we have a $3.5 billion maintenance backlog on our facilities.
Thirty percent of the facilities we are using were built during the
Manhattan Project, and 50 percent of the facilities we are using are
more than 40 years old.
Now, we are fortunate that we have got some engineers and other
highly skilled workers who are willing to work in those conditions, but
they are not going to be willing to work in it forever. And so this
bill doesn't solve that problem by any stretch of the imagination, but
at least this extra $39 billion helps it from getting too much worse.
It takes a step in the right direction.
These nuclear weapons are aging machines, just like the facilities
are aging machines, and they require care and trading out parts if the
people who have to work around them are going to be safe. That is why
it is a mistake to take away from this central element of our facility.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my
time.
The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer).
The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further
proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oregon will
be postponed.

{time} 2045

Amendment No. 2 Offered by Mr. Gohmert

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 2
printed in House Report 113-455.
Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of subtitle C of title V, add the following new
section:

SEC. 5__. AUTHORIZING COMMANDERS TO PERMIT MEMBERS OF THE
ARMED FORCES TO CARRY A FIREARM ON A MILITARY
INSTALLATION.

(a) General Authorization.--Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, regulation, or directive, the Secretary of
Defense shall--
(1) authorize DoD personnel to openly carry a loaded
firearm for the purpose of providing 24-hour security
monitoring in order to ensure the safety of DoD military and
civilian personnel and their dependents who reside on
military installations; or
(2) establish and carry out a procedure to permit qualified
military personnel to openly carry a loaded firearm on a
military installation for personal protection.
(b) Commander Control Over Authorization.--Commanders at
all levels will exercise sufficient control over
authorizations involving the carrying of firearms in
accordance with subsection (a).
(c) Security Monitoring Duty Roster Program.--The
authorization described in subsection (a)(1)--
(1) is in addition to other programs that permit DoD
personnel to perform law enforcement and security duties;
(2) shall be carried out as a program on the duty roster;
and
(3) at a minimum, include placing security personnel at all
points of entry into barracks and multi-family residences on
military installation.
(d) Qualified Military Personnel Defined.--For purposes of
subsection (a)(2), the term ``qualified military personnel''
means a member of the armed forces on active duty who--
(1) has passed a gun safety course that is certified by any
State, the District of Columbia, or any territory or
possession of the United States as providing adequate
training to enable the member to carry a concealed handgun in
such State, the District of Columbia, or such territory or
possession;
(2) is not the subject of any disciplinary action under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice for an assaultive offense
that could result in incarceration or separation from the
Armed Forces under other than honorable conditions;
(3) meets annual eligibility requirements for use of any
military firearm, as established by the Secretary of the
military department concerned;
(4) passes a background check, as established by the
Secretary of the military department concerned;
(5) passes a psychological evaluation, as established by
the Secretary of the military department concerned;
(6) is not under the influence of alcohol or another
intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance; and
(7) is not prohibited by Federal law from receiving a
firearm.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman
from Texas (Mr. Gohmert) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas.
Mr. GOHMERT. Mr. Chairman, at this time, I yield to the gentleman
from California (Mr. McKeon), the chairman of the committee, for a
colloquy.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank the gentleman. We just had
a little discussion. The amendment he plans on presenting tonight is
something that we have not in the committee been able to hold hearings
on and to really discuss fully in the committee.
It didn't come up at the full committee or the subcommittee level,
but he has an issue that is very important to him, it is very important
to his State, it is very important to many people around this Nation.

[[Page H4674]]

What I told him is that this is the start of a process. It is a
continuation of a process that we started in January with hearings,
with subcommittee hearings, with subcommittee markups, and full
committee markups, but we are not even halfway through the process yet.
After we pass our bill on the floor, the Senate is marking their bill
up this week, and at some point, they will mark it on the floor, and
then there will be a conference, so there is much to do between now and
the end.
Mr. GOHMERT. Reclaiming my time, my concern has been when we had a
second shooting without the administration having done anything after
the first Fort Hood shooting and then we have a second Fort Hood
shooting 4\1/2\ years later, it made no sense not to do something.
My own feeling was we should just allow all of our military members,
they may be carrying automatic weapons, they may be authorized to shoot
RPGs, drop bombs, all kinds of weapons in a foreign theater, why
shouldn't they be able to carry weapons on military installations here
in the United States?
So my first amendment was simply to just allow every military member
to carry, and then the issue came open or concealed. There are some
commanders that have an issue both ways.
In talking to other commanders, some commanders have said: look,
there are some people overseas we don't let carry weapons, and we know
from experience that some have returned where you have someone
suffering potentially from PTSD that needs to be checked out.
So commanders have encouraged that: gee, if that is going to happen,
we ought to be able to check them out.
Everybody knows nobody stands stronger for Second Amendment rights
than me, but when you are in the military, you do give up certain
rights, including free speech and freedom of assembly; and so it
shouldn't be inappropriate to have someone go through an extra check
before they were allowed to carry.
Then bowing further to current commanders and former commanders like
Jerry Boykin--former Delta Force--thought, gee, we can give them a
choice, either have a duty roster where people walk around with
weapons, and that would discourage further shooting because, clearly,
as an article by Arthur Berg says in The Wall Street Journal, these
people want to conclude it themselves. If they are afraid someone will
shoot them before they conclude it, then that would not be--they
wouldn't be going through it.
So those are all things that motivate my amendment being filed, and
the chairman here tells me that this is an issue that they would like
to push in conference with the Senate bill that will be brought
through.
Since there is an ongoing concern about what would be the best way to
do this, as I have experienced with commanders I have talked to, I have
been encouraged--and not in a bad way--that this would be a way that we
could do it, I would be consulted on what was being done in conference
and that it would be brought up there.
As a result, based on the assurances of my friend, the chairman, I
ask unanimous consent to withdraw my amendment at this time.
The Acting CHAIR. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman
from Texas?
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Reserving the right to object, I just want
to talk for a moment or two. I hear all that, and I am happy to have
the amendment withdrawn. I think this is a bad idea from our side of
the aisle. I have talked to a lot of people in the military, and they
are deeply concerned about the notion of allowing people to be armed on
base at all times. The command structure issues that you mentioned and
the rights that are given up, this is something that we would strongly
oppose.
I just want to make sure for the Record a colloquy doesn't put
something in conference, okay? I don't know what the Senate is going to
do. There is nothing in our bill on this. If there is nothing in the
Senate bill, it ain't in conference. So, if you want to withdraw it and
keep working on the Senate, that is fine. I just want to make sure that
we don't have some record here that thinks that, with this colloquy, it
makes this a conference issue.
The Acting CHAIR. Does the gentleman from Washington withdraw his
reservation?

Parliamentary Inquiry

Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, point of parliamentary
inquiry, a colloquy does not put an issue in a position to be in
conference, does it? It has to be in either the House or the Senate
bill?
The Acting CHAIR. That is a matter for debate.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. All right. Well, if the purpose is to
withdraw the amendment, I will withdraw my reservation of objection.
The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the amendment is withdrawn.
There was no objection.

Amendment No. 3 Offered by Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California

The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 3
printed in House Report 113-455.
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment
at the desk.
The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Page 270, line 11, strike ``REACTORS.'' and insert
``REACTORS, AND DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION.''.
Page 270, line 20, insert ``or for other national security
purposes,'' before ``the Secretary of Defense may''.
Page 270, line 25, insert ``, defense nuclear
nonproliferation programs,'' before ``or weapons
activities''.

The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentlewoman
from California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez) and a Member opposed each will
control 5 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from California.
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such
time as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, every day, the United States faces an extremely urgent
and dangerous threat, and this threat goes beyond the traditional
dangers of states possessing nuclear weapons.
What I am talking about right now is the very real possibility of
these dangerous materials landing in the hands of terrorist
organizations. Because of this real threat, I know that there is no one
in this Chamber who will deny the importance of nonproliferation
programs and how effective they are in combating one of the greatest
threats to the United States' security.
For example, just imagine if Ukraine still had its nuclear materials
today. Imagine the disaster we would be in as the administration
endeavored to accelerate the removal of nuclear materials from Ukraine,
but the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, an incredibly important
nonproliferation program, could not adequately respond because it
required additional funds, but the Department of Defense could not
transfer those necessary funds.
This is exactly the type of situation we are trying to avoid by
passing my amendment. Fortunately, the United States removed over 235
kilograms of highly enriched uranium over 2 years from the two
remaining sites in Ukraine in 2012. This is enough highly enriched
uranium to develop more than nine nuclear weapons.
We do not have the ability to predict the future, especially with
challenges and threats we will face. This is why we need the ability to
be flexible. This is essential, and that is exactly what my amendment
provides.
The Department of Defense has been transferring approximately $1
billion per year to NNSA weapons programs, and over the next 5 years,
DOD will be providing around $1.5 billion annually for NNSA weapons and
Naval Reactor programs.
What the Sanchez amendment would do is to allow the Department of
Defense to have the option of transferring funds to nonproliferation
programs. It does not remove funding from weapons programs or Naval
Reactor Program, but it provides DOD the flexibility to allocate
funding to areas which they believe will effectively secure dangerous
nuclear material and to respond to emergencies and threats as they may
arise.
Nuclear weapons materials remain dangerously vulnerable, so terrorist
groups continue to seek these weapons and material every day.
I would like to ask my colleagues from both sides of the aisle, if
there was a loose nuclear weapon or missing

[[Page H4675]]

fissile material or the risk of these materials landing in the hands of
terrorists, why would we not want the Department of Defense to have the
flexibility to engage nuclear weapons experts from NNSA? That is
exactly what my amendment provides.
Once again, my amendment doesn't take any funding away from weapons
nor from Naval Reactors, but it simply removes the barriers and
provides the Department of Defense the flexibility to use all of its
resources to effectively address such nuclear threats.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in opposition.
The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chairman, this is the fourth year in a row
this amendment or something similar to it has been offered. Once again,
I am going to ask that this be rejected.
The DOD has asked for the authority to transfer funds to NNSA's
nuclear weapons activities and Naval Reactors. It has not asked to move
limited resources to pay for NNSA nonproliferation activities.
The Navy may need to utilize authority in FY 2015 to support Naval
Reactors, which has taken major funding cuts in recent years, including
23 percent in FY 2014.
As Admiral Richardson, director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion Programs
at NNSA said at our hearing on April 8:

A 23 percent shortfall in my operations and infrastructure
requirements resulted in insufficient funds to do required
maintenance on one of my land-based prototypes, and without
relief, I will have no choice but to shut down that reactor,
resulting in 450 nuclear-trained operators not reporting to
the fleet, putting a greater burden on sailors and families
that are already sustaining 9- to 10-month deployments.

Keeping the underlying language sends a clear message to NNSA that
nuclear weapons activities and Naval Reactors are the NNSA's primary
mission and that it must prioritize those missions and deliver what the
military needs.
Any defense funds transferred out of DOD should only be used for
activities in line with DOD priorities, so I urge opposition to the
gentlelady's amendment.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, may I ask how much
time I have left?
The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from California has 1\1/2\ minutes
remaining.
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I reserve my time to
close.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I yield such time as he may consume to the
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chair, I thank the subcommittee chairman for
yielding, and I do want to applaud my friend and colleague from
California for her desire to fund nonproliferation.
That is a worthy goal that we all agree with, but right now, NNSA is
going to be spending in the bill that we are debating $1.6 billion for
that worthy goal, and to allow the Department of Defense to go in that
direction also would dilute the money that they need so badly for
readiness and training, paying our men and women in uniform, providing
them the food and weapons that they need.
So for that reason, I, too, oppose this amendment and ask for a
``no'' vote.
Nuclear nonproliferation efforts simply don't need more money, and if
you don't believe me, believe General Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff. At our March 16 hearing, he said, in response to a
question of my colleague from California, Ms. Sanchez:

I speak in this regard on behalf of the Joint Chiefs
because, of course, we have discussed and debated this among
ourselves, and I think we have allocated an appropriate and
adequate amount of money into nonproliferation in our budget.

So simply put, our senior military officials agree that the
nonproliferation budget is already sufficient, and therefore, this
amendment is unnecessary.
This is the fourth year in a row we have debated it, and I would just
ask that we stop the debate on this amendment and vote ``no.''
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. I yield back the balance of my time.
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chairman, I would like to
correct my colleague. It was not the fourth year in a row we have
debated it. For example, we didn't debate this last year.
I would further like to say that one of the reasons we have asked for
Naval Reactor moneys is because of the shortfall that they had this
past year that they weren't able to react to because they didn't have
the flexibility.
So with all of these issues going on with terrorists, in particular
looking for nuclear arms or material, I think that it is important for
us to give the Department of Defense that flexibility.
The same type of thing that they found themselves in a bind for with
the reactors this past year, it would be important not to find
ourselves in a bind if we would need it for this year.

{time} 2100

And I would also like to remind my colleagues that yes, we put some
more money into nonproliferation this year after many years of cutting
it, but we put a significantly more amount of money into the nuclear
armament piece.
Mr. Chairman, I would just ask my colleagues to vote for the
flexibility for the Department of Defense. I have no further speakers,
and I urge my colleagues to support my amendment with the underlying
bill.
Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. ROGERS of Alabama. Mr. Chair, I respect my friend from
California. She is very knowledgeable on the subject, but she is wrong
on this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote.
Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez).
The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded
vote.
The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on
the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California will be
postponed.

Amendment No. 4 Offered by Mr. Lamborn

The CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 4 printed in
House Report 113-455.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

In section 1215, redesignate subsections (d) and (e) as
subsections (e) and (f), respectively.
In section 1215, insert after subsection (c) the following:
(d) Process for Reimbursement.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of Defense shall request
submission of claims for reimbursement, including full
documentation, from each grantee, contractor, or
subcontractor that paid to the Government of Afghanistan
taxes assessed on Department of Defense assistance during
fiscal year 2014 for an amount equal to the amount the
grantee, contractor, or subcontractor paid to the Government
of Afghanistan in such taxes.
(2) Plan for reimbursement.--The Secretary of Defense shall
seek to establish a plan in conjunction with the Government
of Afghanistan to address claims for reimbursement described
in paragraph (1) and to provide for reimbursement by the
Government of Afghanistan of such claims. The Secretary shall
submit any such plan established under this paragraph to the
congressional defense committees in a timely manner.
(3) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary of Defense does not
submit the plan described in paragraph (2) to the
congressional defense committees by not later than March 1,
2015, any funds withheld from the Government of Afghanistan
pursuant to subsection (a) shall be used to reimburse each
grantee, contractor, or subcontractor that submits a claim
for reimbursement under paragraph (1) by the amount specified
in such claim and verified by the Secretary.

The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from
Colorado (Mr. Lamborn) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, when our soldiers, sailors, airmen,
marines, and Defense civilians deploy overseas, the Department of
Defense enters into agreements with the host nation to prohibit the
taxation of the assistance provided by U.S. companies to support their
missions.

[[Page H4676]]

We have entered into such agreements with Afghanistan, but in the
last 6 years, the Afghan Government has chosen to ignore these
agreements. It has levied more than $1 billion in illegal taxes against
our U.S. businesses which are supporting our warfighters.
Last year we took action to withhold assistance funding in response
to this illegal taxation, yet the Afghan Government continues to submit
tax bills to our companies. If the firms refuse to pay, Afghan
officials threaten to deny them permits and visas, to arrest company
workers, and to prohibit them from moving mission essential equipment
into and throughout the country. Though our committee has now increased
the amount of funding to be withheld, I propose this amendment to
hopefully end this wrong practice altogether.
This amendment would require two important steps forward: first the
Secretary of Defense would take a full account of illegal taxes levied
by the Afghan Government against American companies; second, the
Secretary will establish a plan for the Afghan Government to reimburse
the illegally levied taxes.
In short, no U.S. company should be threatened or financially
punished for supporting our troops and Department of Defense civilians
in Afghanistan. This amendment strikes at the root of the problem, and
I urge its adoption.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to the
amendment.
The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chair, I am very sympathetic to the
problem. This is certainly something that the Afghan Government should
not be doing. As I understand the amendment, however, this would
require the U.S. Government to reimburse those private companies and
then seek reimbursement from the Afghan Government.
At the end of the day, that is the problem and concern that we have
on our side is that if we want to take all the deliberate steps that we
can to try and require the Afghans to repay this money, that is great--
I can see the little gathering of staff over there that disagrees with
me, so maybe we will have to work on this. But as I understand it, if
that reimbursement cannot be achieved from the Afghan Government, this
would require the U.S. Government, the U.S. taxpayers to reimburse
these companies. For that reason, I would be opposed unless someone can
convince me otherwise.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, in response, and I appreciate the
gentleman's comments, the bookkeeping trouble that this would involve
is first put on the Afghan Government in an attempt to save the trouble
to our own Department of Defense folks.
On your second point, I don't believe U.S. taxpayer dollars would be
at risk because this would only be money withheld that would otherwise
go to the Afghan Government and is committed for that purpose is my
understanding.
So you raise good questions, but I think both of those objections are
satisfied by this amendment.
At this point, Mr. Chairman, I would like to yield as much time as he
may consume to the gentleman from California, Representative McKeon,
the chairman of the full committee.
Mr. McKEON. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank the gentleman for his
concern and for bringing this issue to the floor.
We did address this in the underlying bill. DOD contractors are
providing very important services. It supports the ISAF mission in
Afghanistan, and they should not be illegally taxed.
We need to address this. I think the gentleman's amendment will move
the process forward. I think we have time between now and the Senate
passage and conference to resolve the issue. Also, hopefully there will
be a new President in Afghanistan that will have a whole different way
of addressing the situation. So what I would ask is that we do continue
to work together on this as we move the process forward through
conference.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, how much time is left on our side of the
issue?
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Colorado has 2 minutes remaining.
Mr. LAMBORN. I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chair, I yield myself the balance of my
time.
The problems are there in the drafting of this amendment. Yes, first
it does ask for the Afghan Government to step up and find money and do
this; but if they don't, it does put DOD in the position of reimbursing
them. You can say that would just come from money that they would give
to Afghanistan anyway, but that money they are giving to Afghanistan, I
am not sure if that is true, first of all. Second of all, whatever
money we are giving Afghanistan, we are giving it to them for a reason.
So I think there is a problem here.
There is also the problem of do we have a list of these contractors
who have been illegally taxed versus legally taxed? How do we sort
through all of that?
I am not going to belabor the point. I am going to oppose the
amendment. I know how this works. I am going to lose. We will work it
out in conference. I do have serious concerns about this amendment and
the way it is written and urge a ``no'' vote.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, to summarize, these are legitimate
questions that the ranking member has raised. I appreciate his
comments, and there are valid issues in that it is not a clean or
perfect situation. But the trouble is a billion dollars is a lot of
money to our defense contractors, and to not try to address it would do
a really big disservice to them. So I think it is worth tackling the
difficulty that might be entailed in getting the paperwork done
properly because the goal is worth doing. A billion dollars is a lot of
money. Some of these companies might be big contractors; some of them
might be small contractors.
So I would urge the adoption of this amendment, and Mr. Chairman, I
yield back the balance of my time.
The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman
from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
The amendment was agreed to.

Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Garamendi

The CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 5 printed in
House Report 113-455.
Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk.
The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the appropriate place in subtitle E of title XII of
division A, insert the following:

SEC. _. MATTERS RELATING TO COMBATING WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING.

(a) Additional Requirements Under Executive Order 13648.--
(1) In general.--If the President continues to implement
Executive Order 13648 (78 Fed. Reg. 40619; relating to
combating wildlife trafficking), or any related or successor
executive order, on or after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the President shall take the actions described in
paragraphs (2) and (3) with respect to such Executive Order.
(2) Co-chairs of task force.--The President shall direct
the addition of the Secretary of Defense as a Co-Chair of the
Task Force.
(3) Functions.--The President shall direct the Task Force
to perform the following functions:
(A) Address the important role the military can play in
fulfilling the goals of the Strategy and address the national
security concerns presented by wildlife trafficking networks.
(B) Coordinate with the Department of Defense to evaluate
the effectiveness and distribution of funds to foreign
countries for wildlife trafficking assistance.
(C) Update the 2012 strategy of the Department of State and
the United States Agency for International Development to
integrate information systems from the Department of Defense
and other relevant Federal agencies that can provide further
expertise on transnational crime networks involved in
wildlife trafficking.
(D) Carry out a follow-up initiative on the National
Intelligence Estimate regarding wildlife trafficking security
threats that incorporates the Department of Defense and the
potential role of the military and intelligence community in
combating wildlife trafficking.
(E) Combine data from the Department of Defense, the
Department of State, the United States Agency for
International Development, the Fish and Wildlife Service of
the Department of the Interior, and the National Marine
Fisheries Service of the Department of Commerce for a more
successful international information system relating to
wildlife trafficking.
(F) Investigate technologies that the Department of Defense
can supply to foreign governments to combat poaching and
submit to the President a report on progress to achieve this
objective.
(4) Definitions.--In this subsection:

[[Page H4677]]

(A) Strategy.--The term ``Strategy'' means the National
Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking developed and
implemented pursuant to Executive Order 13648 (78 Fed. Reg.
40619; relating to combating wildlife trafficking).
(B) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means Presidential
Task Force on Wildlife Trafficking established pursuant to
section 2 of Executive Order 13648.
(C) Wildlife trafficking.--The term ``wildlife
trafficking'' has the meaning given the term in section 1 of
Executive Order 13648.
(b) Incorporating Wildlife Trafficking as a United States
National Security Concern.--The President shall take such
actions as may be necessary to--
(1) expand the Strategy to Combat Transnational Organized
Crime (July 2011) to cover wildlife trafficking terrorist and
insurgent networks and authorize the consideration of such
networks as a security priority;
(2) authorize the Department of Defense to evaluate
wildlife trafficking as a non-traditional security issue that
threatens United States national security and require the
Department of Defense to submit to Congress a report
regarding progress during and the results after evaluating
the threat of wildlife trafficking as a non-traditional human
security issue;
(3) authorize the Department of Defense to establish and
carry out a grant program to transfer excess defense articles
to allied countries that are combating wildlife trafficking;
(4) authorize the Department of Defense to target financial
and asset flows of organized criminal syndicates, insurgents,
and terrorist networks that are involved in any aspect of
wildlife trafficking; and
(5) authorize the expansion of security cooperation
programs to include funds for wildlife trafficking training
and equipment.
(c) Additional Programs Under Training and Education.--
(1) Regional defense combating terrorism fellowship
program.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the
Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Program includes
instruction on targeting the security threats of terrorist
groups engaged in illegal wildlife trafficking.
(2) Partnership for integrated logistics operations and
tactics.--The Secretary of Defense shall expand the
Partnership for Integrated Logistics Operations and Tactics
to build long-term operational logistics between the Armed
Forces of the United States and the Afghan Security Forces to
include cooperation for operations combating wildlife
trafficking networks.

Modification to Amendment No. 5 Offered by Mr. Garamendi

Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent that my
amendment be modified with what I have placed at the desk.
The CHAIR. The Clerk will report the modification.
The Clerk read as follows:
Modification offered by Mr. Garamendi to amendment No. 5:

On page 5, line 14 replace ``Afghan Security Forces'' with
``African Union Standby Force (ASF)''

The CHAIR. Without objection, the amendment is modified.
There was no objection.
The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from
California (Mr. Garamendi) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California.
Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, for some time, like more than an hour
today, this House debated and discussed the issue of Boko Haram and the
terror that they are enacting throughout Nigeria and the southern Sahel
of Africa. This is not a new issue. This is an issue that has been
ongoing among several violent extreme organizations operating in that
area. We have seen this in Sudan. We have heard about the Lord's
Resistance Army. We know this problem also of violent extreme
organizations in the Somalia area.
The question arises: How do these organizations finance themselves?
Well, over the years previously it was blood diamonds and things of
that sort. In recent years, it has now become an issue of killing
elephants and selling their tusks.
This amendment deals with the violent extreme organizations and
attempts to deal with the way in which they have been able to finance
themselves, that is, illegally poaching animals, particularly elephants
in Africa.
If we are going to deal with this, we are going to have to use some
of the assets that are available through the American military. AFRICOM
has shown that they can provide ISR assets. This happened in Mali with
the violent extreme organization that eventually was dealt with in
Mali. AFRICOM provided the use of the ISR Global Hawk to identify and
to support the French troops.
What this amendment would do would be to authorize the military, the
Department of Defense, to work with African countries to provide
support as they attempt to deal with these violent extreme
organizations that are illegally poaching animals and using that
revenue from that poaching, particularly the sale of ivory, to support
themselves.
The amendment also provides for the opportunity for the African Union
forces to receive assistance from the American military in how to
position themselves to have the correct military units in place, how to
use various intelligence sources that are available. It also provides
for the Department of Defense to become part of the organization that
we now have in place to deal with illegal poaching throughout Africa.
That is basically what it is.
Had this been in place for the last couple of years, would Boko Haram
have been successful? Well, they would be less successful. They would
have less opportunity to poach the very valuable elephants and their
tusks.
So I ask for support of this amendment, and I reserve the balance of
my time.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chair, I claim the time in opposition.
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chair, I yield myself 2 minutes.
Mr. Chairman, this issue has been a longstanding concern of the
gentleman from California as well as other Members. There is certainly
evidence that terrorists and criminal organizations use a variety of
illegal methods to fund their organizations. That includes wildlife
trafficking. It includes human trafficking. It includes drug
trafficking. It includes kidnapping for ransom. A whole variety of
illegal methods are used to fund these organizations.
Now, in last year's NDAA, we expanded the authority of the military
to deal with Ministries of Interior so that in fighting terrorism they
can have more options available to them. It is also those Ministries of
Interior that deal with these wildlife trafficking issues.
Last year's bill also added 15 countries in Africa to the list of
those countries with which DOD can partner on transnational criminal
organizations involving drugs.

{time} 2115

For Boko Haram they already designated a terrorist organization. For
them or for drugs those authorities already exist.
The question is: Do we want to make it a priority of the military to
focus on this illegal poaching as a priority in itself? My concern is
that the military is already stretched thin. If it is terrorism, fine.
If it is these transnational organizations, fine. But to give the
military poaching as a priority would be a mistake.
The other point I would make is that the President's budget for the
State Department cut funding for this very purpose this year. Last
year, they spent about $54 billion. This year the President asked for
less than $30 million.
So my suggestion to the Member is that perhaps he could focus on the
President's budget request for the State Department, the Department of
the Interior, law enforcement agencies, all of which are engaged in
this, and that would be a better use of resources.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, the gentleman from Texas makes a very
useful and interesting argument, but neglects to focus on one of the
principal ways in which these organizations do support themselves, and
that is with illegal poaching, particularly of elephants, and the use
of their tusks to support themselves. It is about an $8 billion
business.
This does not in any way deter the current power that the Department
of Defense has, but rather, it allows them to engage with those
organizations in these governments that deal specifically with the
conservation of the species in those countries. It does not prioritize.
It simply gives an additional role and augments the military's use of
their equipment, particularly the ISR equipment, to focus specifically,
but not only, on the poaching issue.

[[Page H4678]]

It is very clear from studies that have been done by conservation
organizations throughout the Sahel of Africa and in other parts of
Africa, that this is a significant source of revenue for these violent
extreme organizations. We ought not ignore that.
I would ask for a positive vote on this matter in that it does not
deter in any way from what the gentleman from Texas says the military
is already doing, but adds to it.
With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlelady
from Indiana (Mrs. Walorski), a valuable member of the Armed Services
Committee.
Mrs. WALORSKI. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman from Texas.
Mr. Chairman, I rise to oppose the amendment. While I appreciate the
good intention of the gentleman from California, I believe we have
immense security challenges in Africa and limited defense resources.
Defense has been cut over $1 trillion in recent years, the military
is facing shortfalls in readiness, and terrorism threats across Africa
are evolving and expanding.
Given that the military cannot meet our current requirements in
Africa, I don't think it is wise to add new requirements at this time.
Military commanders in Africa have testified about shortfalls in
intelligence, crisis response forces, and enablers to meet the ``new
normal'' security requirements in Africa.
No military commander has highlighted wildlife trafficking as a key
issue in their area of responsibility, nor have they recommended it be
prioritized before this committee.
Combating wildlife trafficking should not be a core DOD mission. DOD
and the administration recognize that combating wildlife trafficking is
not a core DOD function, and thus the national strategy for combating
wildlife trafficking does not set forth any DOD requirements.
In an era of declining budgets, the DOD should not be duplicating
efforts that are already occurring within the interagency, including
the intelligence community, the law enforcement community, and the
State Department, all of which are already working on and collecting
information on this issue.
Mr. THORNBERRY. Mr. Chairman, the bottom line is if there is a
terrorism connection to this illegal poaching, the military has full
authority to go after it and try to stop it, just like other forms of
terrorist financing. But as an independent objective for the military,
we are stretched too thin already, and for that reason I recommend that
the Members reject this amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment, as modified, offered by
the gentleman from California (Mr. Garamendi).
The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the noes
appeared to have it.
Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on
the amendment, as modified, offered by the gentleman from California
will be postponed.

Amendment No. 6 Offered by Mr. Daines

The CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 6 printed in
House Report 113-455.
Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

Page 515, strike lines 19 and 20.

The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from
Montana (Mr. Daines) and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Montana.
Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Chairman, our country's intercontinental ballistic missiles make
the world safer. They are an integral part of the nuclear triad that
advances the cause of peace and promotes our national security
interests around the world.
The Defense Department recently put forward a nuclear force structure
plan under the New START Treaty. It is committed to maintaining 450
nuclear launchers in at least a warm status. In doing so, the Pentagon
recognized the strategic value of preserving our robust nuclear
deterrent capability.
The base bill would sunset the warm status requirement in 2021. I
believe this is unwise and it is premature.
First and foremost, we don't know what the future holds and whether
it will be in our strategic and security interests to shut down some of
our silos 7 years from now.
On the other hand, what we do know is that maintaining our nuclear
launchers provides our commanders with maximum flexibility to respond
to potential nuclear threats against the American people and our
allies. And we know that preserving this capability complicates our
adversaries' ability to target our nuclear assets.
Further, we know that maintaining our current silos is in the best
interest of taxpayers because rebuilding them would be very expensive.
In short, there is simply no justification for deciding today how
many silos will be needed to safeguard our security interests in 2021.
I urge House passage of my amendment to strike the ill-advised sunset
provision in the underlying.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment.
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, this amendment violates a bipartisan
agreement that was reached in the House Armed Services Committee.
I wish that the gentleman would focus on the fact that micromanaging
our Nation's nuclear defenses is really not in the best interest of our
country. I also urge the gentleman to realize that this is a highly
technical issue. We have some 450 Minuteman-III missile silos. This
would change the status of about 50 of those 450.
These are probably the least survivable of all our nuclear weapons.
They have been targeted by the Russians and probably others for
decades. It is very important that we have an appropriate and flexible
and survivable nuclear deterrent. As I mentioned, these land-based
missiles are probably the least survivable.
It is also important to recognize that, as I understand the way the
amendment is drafted, this could even prevent testing and routine
maintenance of these silos. I know that is not the gentleman's intent,
but we need to make sure that we are not overreaching here and
hamstringing our military and their nuclear defenses.
It is no secret that the sponsors of this amendment happen to be from
the States of North Carolina, Montana, and Wyoming, and also a
gentleman from Colorado. That leads one to think that this might
perhaps be a parochial amendment more than a nuclear defense amendment.
I hope that is not the case, but it does lead one to think in that
direction.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, while the President is the Commander in
Chief--this is the issue of micromanaging--the Constitution gives
Congress the power to raise and support armies and to provide and
maintain a Navy. It is our duty and responsibility to help shape our
Nation's defense policy.
Regarding the ICBMs, they are deployed in hardened silos. That would
tend to force an opponent to exhaust his own nuclear forces to disarm
U.S. ICBMs, leaving the opponent vulnerable to a U.S. retaliatory
strike. Without ICBMs, as few as five nuclear warheads could
successfully disarm the U.S.
Now I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Dakota, Kevin
Cramer, my friend.
Mr. CRAMER. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
With regard to the claims of parochialism, there is no question that
those of us from the States that host these ICBMs are technical experts
in the field. It only makes sense that we would know a lot about it.
Mr. Chairman, while I am content with the Department of Defense's
recent force structure announcement on complying with the New START
Treaty to maintain 454 ICBM silos in warm status, I too strongly oppose
the hard stop date that maintains these missile

[[Page H4679]]

silos in warm status no later than 2021. Members of this body, Members
of the Senate, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, and many others have said the sustainment of our
nuclear triad is essential and that any further reductions ought not be
done in unilateral fashion.
Maintaining and investing in the modernization of this weapon system
is just as important as any other leg of the nuclear triad. From what I
can tell and from what the people of North Dakota know, it is a lot
cheaper to maintain them than to rebuild them should we err in our
judgment currently.
I urge passage of the amendment.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Washington (Mr. Smith), the distinguished ranking member of the
committee.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I strongly oppose this
amendment. It really doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
What the bill does is it says you can't touch these things since
until 2021. Now, we don't like that in the first place because this is
micromanaging, again, DOD's ability to make decisions about how best to
make sure that we maintain our nuclear deterrence. This is a fine
example of why DOD is going to be in so much trouble down the road. Any
effort they make to save money is going to be blocked by parochial
interest. The people who are from there will rise up and say: No, you
can't do that, basically because it negatively impacts my constituents.
The thing that is truly awful about this one is it doesn't negatively
impact constituents. It says 2021 sunset. And it is not a hard stop
date, regrettably. It is 2021 when it sunsets, and any Congress that
wants to extend it between now and, I guess that is 7 years from now,
can go ahead and extend it.
DOD should not be forced into a position of saying if a silo exists
it has to be maintained forever, which is basically what this amendment
says. It says it is completely impossible that under any set of
circumstances might it be in the best interest of the Department of
Defense and the national security of this Nation to get rid of even one
silo. That doesn't make any sense.
The underlying bill more than protects the parochial interests of the
sponsors here by making sure that DOD can't touch it until 2021. But
that is not enough. They have got to offer an amendment to strip it out
so that it goes on forever. That simply doesn't make any sense. This
is, again, micromanaging for parochial interests. It is just like when
DOD wants to move five C-130s from somewhere. The people from there
rise up and say we have to stop them. No, we don't. We have to let DOD
make intelligent decisions to spend money wisely to best protect
national security. At a minimum, we ought to be able to have a sunset 7
years from now without having to remove even that tiny little
possibility that a sensible decision might be allowed to be made by the
Department of Defense.
I urge opposition of the amendment.
Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I continue to reserve the balance of my
time.
Mr. COOPER. May I inquire as to how much time I have remaining, Mr.
Chairman.
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee has 1\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I yield 30 seconds to the gentleman from
California (Mr. Garamendi).
Mr. GARAMENDI. Mr. Chairman, I took up an amendment a moment ago and
people were talking about how we use our resources to keep these
missile silos open when they are not needed and questioning whether
missiles are needed. We are talking about billions and billions of
dollars. So if we are really, really concerned about how we deploy our
precious money, then we ought not be doing this amendment.

{time} 2130

Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I continue to reserve the balance of my
time.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to oppose this
amendment.
As I mentioned, it is poorly drafted, and it probably prevents even
the routine testing and maintenance of the silos, which could not
possibly be an intention of the authors. It also micromanages the
Defense Department.
For them to renege on the deal that was made in committee--the
bipartisan deal--in order to give you 7 more years of leeway is really
a pretty remarkable thing. This sets a new level for parochialism and
greed, unfortunately, in this body. I hope the Members will reject this
amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. DAINES. Mr. Chairman, I am prepared to close.
Again, I urge support for my amendment, which is to protect our
country's nuclear deterrent capability by striking this unwise and
premature sunset language in the underlying bill.
I yield back the balance of my time.
The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman
from Montana (Mr. Daines).
The question was taken; and the Chair announced that the ayes
appeared to have it.
Mr. COOPER. Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote.
The CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on
the amendment offered by the gentleman from Montana will be postponed.

Amendment No. 7 Offered by Mr. Lamborn

The CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 7 printed in
House Report 113-455.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment.
The text of the amendment is as follows:

At the end of subtitle B of title XXVIII, add the following
new section:

SEC. 28__. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC
LANDS.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) national defense should be the top priority for all
aspects of the Federal Government; and
(2) national security functions, such as military training
and exercises, should be the top priority, particularly with
regard to the use of land owned by the United States.

The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 585, the gentleman from
Colorado (Mr. Lamborn) and a Member opposed each will control 5
minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, most Americans do not realize that 28
percent of the land across our great country is owned by the Federal
Government. In the 11 most western States, the Federal Government owns
a staggering 47 percent of all land.
In my State of Colorado, the Federal Government owns 36 percent of
the land. Over one-third of all land in Colorado is owned and operated
here, out of Washington, D.C.
The management of these lands is often controversial, particularly
when the Federal Government owns such a significant portion of the land
of a State or of a locality. There are often situations where there are
competing and conflicting uses of this publicly-owned land.
This Federal ownership of public land is administered through a
variety of Federal agencies and bureaus, making things potentially even
more difficult for States and localities.
This public land serves many functions, including, in some cases, as
a prime training ground for the U.S. military. In Colorado, for
example, the new Combat Aviation Brigade at Fort Carson flies their
helicopters up into the mountains around Colorado Springs for training.
To practice high altitude landings in rugged terrain, which is a
crucial skill for combat in countries like Afghanistan, the Army must
get permission from the various parts of the Federal Government that
own the land.
Over the last few years, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land
Management and other agencies have reduced the number of landing sites
that are permissible. In the latest permit, they told the Army that
Congress has not made national security a priority for public lands.
Unfortunately, this is not just isolated to Colorado. Across the
country, military bases are continually fighting with other government
agencies to maintain their access to public lands.
Today, my amendment will help set the record straight. National
security should be the top priority for our government, and that most
certainly includes the ownership of public land--land owned and
operated by the Federal Government. We should apply the rule of common
sense.
Unless there is an obvious reason not to, public land should, of
course, be

[[Page H4680]]

available so that men and women in uniform can receive realistic,
effective training that will save lives in combat. As we stand here
tonight, we must remember that the first job of the Federal Government
is to protect our Nation.
I urge support for my amendment, resolving that national security
should be a top priority for public lands.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I claim the time in
opposition.
The CHAIR. The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, there are a lot of competing
interests for public lands. Certainly, national security is one of
them, but it is not the only one. There is domestic aviation, and there
are all kinds of considerations.
This is not terribly binding, as it is a sense of Congress, and so it
does not change the law. I do, however, think it sets a bad precedent
that, somehow, the Department of Defense is going to hold sway over
public lands over all of their interests, regardless of what they are.
We have had many, many interests in our public lands. Certainly,
defense is one of them. I don't think it should be paramount.
Therefore, I oppose the amendment.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I just don't want it to happen again that
the Forest Service or any other bureaucracy can tell the men and women
who are training to protect our country that they can't train and that
Congress has never even addressed this situation.
I at least want to have a resolution on record expressing the sense
of Congress that national defense is a priority. That is the way our
Constitution is written. I think this makes all kinds of sense, and I
would urge its adoption.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I
may consume.
It sort of depends on why the Forest Service wants to limit that use.
If there are other legitimate interests in the area and if the Forest
Service doesn't want them test-firing whatever it is they are test-
firing, I think we need to have a balance between those interests.
It is conceivable that the Forest Service might have something they
are trying to protect that the DOD has not thought about, and I think a
balance of those interests is better than making one agency paramount
over others.
The Forest Service does not know much about the Department of
Defense, but I would submit that the Department of Defense doesn't know
much about what the Forest Service is trying to protect. It is a matter
of both sides doing their jobs and striking the proper balance, so I
would simply urge a ``no'' vote.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, may I inquire as to how much time is
remaining?
The CHAIR. The gentleman from Colorado has 2 minutes remaining.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, in conclusion, I would just say that there
are balancing interests and that there are competing interests that
should be, many times, debated and weighed. That is, actually, what the
Army at Fort Carson does.
They have entered into the permitting agreements with the Forest
Service and with the Bureau of Land Management, agreeing with the
concerns raised by those two bureaucracies, so they have worked
together in a cooperative fashion.
What I am addressing, though, is when the Forest Service comes out
and says that Congress has never addressed this issue. I think that
that is wrong. Now is the time to set the record straight, and this
amendment does set the record straight.
We are expressing that national security is a priority. That is what
the Constitution says, and that is what we are stating right here. I
ask for an ``aye'' vote.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman
from Colorado (Mr. Lamborn).
The amendment was agreed to.
Mr. LAMBORN. Mr. Chairman, I move that the Committee do now rise.
The motion was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr.
Daines) having assumed the chair, Mr. Stewart, Chair of the Committee
of the Whole House on the state of the Union, reported that that
Committee, having had under consideration the bill (H.R. 4435) to
authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for military activities
of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to
prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for
other purposes, had come to no resolution thereon.

____________________