[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 68 (Wednesday, May 7, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2780-S2782]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STUDENT LOAN DEBT
Mr. MURPHY. Mr. President, I wish to very briefly join my colleagues
here
[[Page S2781]]
in support of the effort being led by Senator Durbin, Senator Warren,
Senator Reid, and Senator Harkin. They have done such incredible work
on behalf of students all across the country.
One of the most amazing statistics to me is a simple one. Not so long
ago the United States was No. 1 in the world when it came to the number
of young people who had college degrees. In a very short amount of
time, we have precipitously fallen from No. 1 to No. 12 due to the fact
that other countries have caught up, which is an issue in and of
itself, but it also has something to do with the fact that the cost of
college has become calamitous for students all across this country, and
it is taking kids a lot longer to complete their degrees--many of whom
are starting and never even finishing.
I am an example of the squeeze that American families are in. I don't
complain about the income my wife and I make, but we are both paying
back our student loans and we are saving for our kids' student loans.
So I know the amount of a family's income that can be gobbled up trying
to pay back prior college and save for future college, and I know where
that money would go if it weren't going to pay for those two costs. For
us, that money would go into the local economy.
So this is the middle-class issue of our generation, as my colleague
Senator Schatz often says, because it is not just about families trying
to pay back college and save for college; it is also about all of the
places that money could go if it weren't going to the banks and the
Federal Government, which are making a pretty profit off of this system
as it is.
Finally, I will make a pitch for a piece of legislation that Senator
Schatz, myself, and Senators Murray and Sanders have introduced because
I think we need to have two conversations. One is about making sure we
reduce the financial burden for families, but there is also a
conversation we need to have about putting pressure on schools to
reduce the ticket price, the sticker price of attending college. We,
frankly, haven't done a very good job of leveraging the $140 billion we
spend on financial aid to pressure colleges to do the right thing.
There is one for-profit college in California that takes in 1.6
billion every year of taxpayer dollars, and the average student there
spends only 3 months on campus because they start school and never
finish it. Their loan default rates are above 30 percent. That is a
terrible investment for those kids but also for the Federal taxpayers'
dollars.
Our piece of legislation--which we hope will be considered in the
broader reauthorization of higher education statutes in this country--
would say it is time we hold colleges to a different standard and force
them to get serious about costs and quality. In the end, that will be
just as helpful--keeping control of quality and cost at our colleges--
as the effort being led by so many of my colleagues on the floor here
tonight.
I am very glad to join in this effort. It is a personal cause for me
and my family given that we are living this reality today but one that
is a much greater imperative for all families who have been struggling
with this burden across the State the Presiding Officer and I
represent.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New York.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I am going to be very brief, and I will
come back tomorrow to speak at greater length.
One of the things Americans know is that college is becoming more of
a necessity and is getting to be priced like more of a luxury. We can't
have that. When college is a ticket to success--not just income success
but even recent surveys show longevity and happiness--it is a crying
shame when any American deserves to go to college but doesn't go or
doesn't go to the right college because he or she can't afford it. We
aim to change that in a variety of ways, but the one Senator Warren has
talked about and taken the lead on is in terms of refinancing.
It is absolutely outrageous that students who got out of college in
the last 5 to 20 years are paying 8 percent, 9 percent, and up to 13
percent in interest. If they took out a loan today, they would pay 3
percent or 4 percent. This puts huge burdens on their shoulders in
their prime earning years and their family-forming years. It crimps the
housing market because if you have $30,000 in student loans, you are
not likely to take out a $100,000 mortgage.
So all we are asking for is a fair shot. If you deserve to go to
college, you should have a fair shot at affording college. And if you
have gone to college, you should have a fair shot at being able to pay
your debts and live a decent life. It is very simple.
We Democrats are focusing our attention on what the average American
needs, giving the average American a fair shot. And there is probably
no place where that fair shot is less attainable than in college
affordability and in acquired student loan debt.
I hope people will listen to us in the next several weeks. I hope my
colleagues on the other side of the aisle--unlike on minimum wage or
equal pay--will join us in coming up with a bipartisan proposal. I hope
we can do something for these students--those who have already gone to
college and are paying disproportionate interest and those who are
going to college and need to afford it. Everyone deserves a fair shot
in America, and they certainly deserve a fair shot, if they have earned
a place in college, to afford that place in college.
I look forward to continuing this discussion and debate in the next
several weeks to come.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Massachusetts.
Ms. WARREN. Mr. President, I commend the Senator from New York and
all of my colleagues who have been here.
Forty million borrowers in this country have student loan debt.
Student loan debt is exploding, and it threatens the financial
stability of our young people and the financial stability of this
country.
I am pleased to see so many of my colleagues here tonight talking
about this problem because, make no mistake, this is an emergency.
Outstanding student loans now total more than $1.2 trillion, and
millions of young people are struggling to keep up with their payments.
It doesn't have to be this way. Congress set artificially high
interest rates on old student loans which generate extra money for the
government. The GAO recently projected that the government will bring
in $66 billion on just the slice of student loans issued between 2007
and 2012. Those are the kinds of profits that would make a Fortune 500
CEO proud.
These young people didn't go to the mall and run up charges on a
credit card. They worked hard and they learned new skills that will
benefit this country and help us build a stronger America. They deserve
a fair shot at an affordable education, and we can give them immediate
relief by cutting the interest rate on existing student loans. We
should cut those interest rates and cut those government profits.
Yesterday I joined with 27 of my colleagues to introduce the Bank on
Students Emergency Loan Refinancing Act, which will do just that. The
idea is simple. With interest rates near historic lows, businesses,
homeowners, and even local governments have refinanced their debts. But
a graduate who took out an unsubsidized loan before July 1 of last year
is locked in to an interest rate of nearly 7 percent. Older loans run 8
percent, 9 percent, and even higher. We need to bring those rates down,
and we need to do it now.
Bank on Students would allow student loan borrowers the opportunity
to lower their interest rates on old loans to match the rates the
government offers to new borrowers--3.86 percent on undergraduate
loans, 5.41 percent for graduate loans, and 6.41 percent for PLUS
loans.
I wish to be clear. These rates are still higher than what it costs
the government to run its student loan program. Our work will not be
done until we have eliminated all of the Federal profits on these
loans. But this legislation is an important step in that direction, and
it is a step both Republicans and Democrats should support.
Last year nearly every Republican in Congress--in the House and the
Senate--voted for the exact same loan rates in this legislation. If
Republicans believe that 3.86 percent is good enough for new
undergraduate borrowers, then
[[Page S2782]]
it should be good enough for all existing undergraduate borrowers.
There is no reason on Earth to say some kids can get a better deal than
others when they all worked hard to do exactly what we wanted them to
do--get an education.
This legislation won't add a single dime to our deficit. The Bank on
Students legislation adopts the Buffett rule, which limits tax
loopholes for millionaires and billionaires. Every dollar we bring in
as a result of that change will go directly to supporting lower
interest rates on existing student loans.
We only introduced this bill yesterday, but we are already getting a
great response. Think tanks such as Demos, student groups such as Young
Invincibles, teacher groups such as the American Federation of Teachers
and the National Education Association have all come forward and
endorsed this proposal. Letters and emails and phone calls are already
pouring in. I am also encouraged by the fact that some Republicans have
also come forward to say they are open to considering a refinancing
proposal.
I want to be clear. This should not be a partisan issue. I am eager
to work with any of my colleagues who believe we need to do something
about the growing student debt crisis. If the Republicans have issues
with this proposal, if they want to suggest different offsets or policy
changes, they should bring their ideas forward. What we can't do is
continue to ignore this problem and hope it will go away on its own.
Congress made this mess by setting artificially high interest rates
that are crushing our kids. It is Congress's responsibility to clean it
up.
I don't kid myself. Refinancing will not fix everything broken in the
higher education system. But the need for comprehensive reform must not
blind us to the urgency of addressing the massive debt that is already
crushing our young people.
This is personal for me. I grew up in an America that made it a
priority to invest in its young people and the opportunity to go to
college. An affordable college and affordable loans opened a million
doors for me. I will keep fighting to make sure every kid who works
hard and plays by the rules gets a fair shot.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Heinrich). The Senator from Connecticut.
____________________