[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 61 (Monday, April 28, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Page S2414]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ISRAEL
Mr. CRUZ. Mr. President, every Member of this body has expressed our
bipartisan commitment for the United States to stand resolutely with
our friend and ally, the nation of Israel. Doing so is right, and it is
overwhelmingly in the national security interests of the United States
of America.
It was therefore with great sadness that I read this morning about
the comments of Secretary of State John Kerry, who reportedly suggested
at the Trilateral Commission that Israel could become an apartheid
state if his proposed two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian
peace process fails.
Secretary Kerry has long experience in foreign policy, and he
understands that words matter. Apartheid is inextricably associated
with one of the worst examples of state-sponsored discrimination in
history--the apartheid system in South Africa that was ultimately
brought down by the heroic resistance of Nelson Mandela inside the
country, supported by a concerted campaign of diplomatic and economic
sanctions by the international community.
There is no place for this word in the context of the State of
Israel. The term ``apartheid'' means apart, different, and isolated--
the state of the victims of apartheid with which the Jews are
tragically all too familiar. The notion that Israel would go down that
path--and so face the same condemnation that faced South Africa--is
unconscionable. The United States should be aggressively asserting that
Israel can never be made an apartheid nation while America exists and
stands beside her because America will be with Israel regardless of the
status of the diplomatic process.
Fifteen months ago, almost to the day, John Kerry was confirmed by
this body by a vote of 94 to 3. Despite my preference for giving the
President the Cabinet members of his choice, I found that I could not
join the vast majority of my colleagues and support his nomination
because I was convinced that as Secretary of State, John Kerry would
place what he considered to be the wishes of the international
community above the national security interests of the United States.
I fear that with these most recent ill-chosen remarks, Secretary
Kerry has proven these concerns well founded. Rather than focusing on
our clear national security interests--which is continuing to guarantee
Israel's security through our unquestionable commitment to it--
Secretary Kerry has instead repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to
countenance a world in which Israel is made a pariah because it will
not sacrifice its security to his diplomatic initiatives; likewise, he
has previously suggested that Israel might probably be subject to
boycotts for the same grounds.
It is no wonder Israel's Defense Minister remarked in January that
``the only thing that can `save us' is for John Kerry to win a Nobel
Prize and leave us in peace.''
Indeed, my colleague, the senior Senator from Arizona, has suggested
that the foreign policy carried out by Mr. Kerry is the equivalent of a
``human wrecking ball.'' The fact that Secretary Kerry sees nothing
wrong with making a statement comparing Israel's policy to the
abhorrent apartheid policies of South Africa--and doing so on the eve
of Holocaust Remembrance Day--demonstrates a shocking lack of
sensitivity to the incendiary and damaging nature of his rhetoric.
Sadly, it is my belief that Secretary Kerry has proven himself
unsuitable for the position he holds and, therefore, before any further
harm is done to our national security interests and to our critical
alliance with the nation of Israel, that John Kerry should offer
President Obama his resignation and the President should accept it.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Ms. MIKULSKI. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________