[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 58 (Wednesday, April 9, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2312-S2313]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
American Cures Act
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, a generation ago, an AIDS diagnosis meant
a sure and agonizing death. It was 23 years ago, when I was in the
House of Representatives, when I was walking to the Chamber for a vote
when I saw a colleague and friend, Tom McMillen, a Congressman from
Maryland, coming my way. You would not miss Tom McMillen. He played in
the NBA. He was tall. As he passed by on the sidewalk, he stopped and
said: Magic has AIDS. It was a stunning announcement that Magic Johnson
had been diagnosed with AIDS. The reality is that was 23 years ago. At
the time we felt this was a death verdict, there was no way to escape
it.
Last month American researchers revealed that a second American baby
born with HIV has apparently been cured of the virus with drugs
delivered just minutes after birth.
How far we have come in 23 years--from an AIDS diagnosis meaning
certain death to being able to cure for the second time a baby born
with HIV with drugs delivered minutes after birth.
These babies were treated as part of a research program at the
National Institutes of Health. Their apparent cures offer real hope for
a quarter of a million babies who were born into the world this year
with HIV--many of them in desperately poor nations.
It is not the only happening when it comes to medical research, by a
long shot. In my home State of Illinois, Dr. Jose Oberholzer from the
University of Illinois-Chicago and Dr. Xunrong Luo from Northwestern
University are among scores of researchers throughout the country on an
NIH-sponsored project to find a cure for Type 1 diabetes.
Do you know anyone with type 1 diabetes? I do. To think that we are
close enough to even consider the possibility of a cure should spur us
all on to want more research in this area done as quickly as possible.
These two doctors are part of an effort called the Clinical Islet
Transplantation Consortium. Islets are a group of beta cells in the
pancreas that produce insulin. Type 1 diabetes destroys these cells.
Transplanting healthy beta cells into the liver of someone with type 1
diabetes can enable the person's body to start producing insulin on its
own--a functional cure for type 1 diabetes.
This is not just a theory; it is starting to show results when it
comes to this clinical research.
Why do I raise these amazing medical research stories on the floor of
the Senate? Because the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives
each year vote on how much money we are going to put into the National
Institutes of Health, and we have had some sad outcomes in recent
years.
Did you know that over the last 10 years we have been unwilling to
give the National Institutes of Health even a cost-of-living
adjustment? So each year they have fallen behind in medical research
just because of inflation. They have fallen behind 22 percent in
awarding research grants such as the ones I just described because we
have failed to provide a cost-of-living adjustment for them.
Does anyone believe we are saving money by cutting back on medical
research? If they do, they are just plain wrong.
They had a program announced about a month ago at NIH called the AMP
Program. It is a new undertaking. The 10 largest pharmaceutical
companies have put up $150 million--not a great amount of money for
successful pharmaceutical companies but an investment--to be matched by
NIH, and they are setting out to use human genomic mapping and cell
information to find cures for Alzheimer's, type 1 diabetes, and
rheumatoid arthritis.
Can we afford this? Can we afford this research? Do you know what we
paid last year in Medicare and Medicaid just for Alzheimer's patients?
It was $203 billion--1 year. If we can, through our research, find a
way to at least delay, if not cure, Alzheimer's, think of the misery
that will be spared these poor families who suffer from Alzheimer's and
think of the money we will save.
Are we so shortsighted as a nation that we have forgotten that
medical research not only finds cures but saves us money that would
otherwise be spent for medical care?
That is why I introduced, 2 weeks ago, the American Cures Act. It is
different. There are not a lot of proposals like it before Congress.
What I am doing with this proposal is trying to get Congress, on both
sides of the aisle, in both Chambers, to make a commitment to American
medical research, American cures.
Here is the commitment: Over the next 10 years, I want a commitment
that we will increase the funding in medical research beyond inflation
5 percent a year--5 percent--for the National Institutes of Health, for
the Centers for Disease Control, the Department of Defense medical
research, and the Veterans' Administration medical research.
What is the cost of that? The cost of that is $150 billion over 10
years--to make a commitment to go forward on medical research. It is a
lot of money. It is a lot of money until you consider what the cost is
each year of Alzheimer's--$200 billion--not to mention the cost of
diabetes, arthritis, and so many other illnesses and diseases that call
for huge investments when it comes to medical care.
Where in the world can we get $150 billion over 10 years? Where could
we possibly find it? Let me give you a starting place. Increase the
Federal tax on tobacco products by 95 cents. I am for that. I will tell
you why I am for it. I have been fighting tobacco as long as I have
been in Congress--the House and Senate--and what I have discovered is,
if you want to discourage young people from smoking, taking up tobacco
addictions that will ultimately cost them their lives, raise the price
of the product. They stop buying it.
In my lifetime, we have seen the percentage of Americans smoking cut
in
[[Page S2313]]
half. So raising that tobacco tax gives us money for medical research
and reduces the likelihood that people will become addicted to nicotine
and tobacco.
Mr. President, 700,000 Americans will not take up the tobacco habit
if we raise that tax 95 cents. It is money well spent on medical
research.
If we do not do this, what happens? We fail to find the cures for
diseases, we continue to make massive expenditures in Medicare and
Medicaid and other health programs, and we watch the world pass us by.
If the United States decides to retreat when it comes to biomedical
research, other countries are ready to step in. Now, today, China is
investing 12 to 20 percent more each year in government research and
medical research--each year. In 8 years China will surpass the United
States in dollars spent on government research and medical research.
Are we ready to let that happen? I hope not.
For the sake of the people who live in this country who need cures
for these diseases, and help, for the sake of the cost to our health
care system that all of this medical challenge presents, and if we want
to maintain a lead when it comes to researchers and doctors and
hospitals, it is time for us on a bipartisan basis to make a commitment
to medical research.
I hope others will join in cosponsoring this American Cures Act. A
number have done this already, and I thank them for joining me. One of
them is on the floor, my colleague from California Mrs. Boxer. She is
always by my side. We have fought a lot of these battles together. And
the list goes on: Senators Reed, Brown, Hirono, Feinstein, Gillibrand,
Cardin, Hagen, Casey, Markey, and Mikulski, and we are just getting
started. I might also say that Congresswoman Anna Eshoo is cosponsoring
this measure in the House.
I cannot think of a more important thing that we can do to make this
a better, safer nation, to reward research, to find cures for diseases,
and to make sure our country continues to lead the world when it comes
to biomedical research.
I hope my colleagues will join me in cosponsoring this legislation.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from California.
Mrs. BOXER. Mr. President, I want to thank my colleague from Illinois
for his leadership in making our people healthier than they otherwise
would be. He talked about the battles we have had making sure that we
crack down on the tobacco companies that told us for years smoking was
safe--as a matter of fact, do it, it will relax you--and they denied
the science.
We lived through those years. Many years ago, I worked with then-
Senator Lautenberg--and Senator Durbin led the charge in the House--to
stop smoking on airplanes. I remember coming home from these long trips
and literally reeking of cigarette smoke--I never smoked in my life,
but just sitting around it in the airplanes.
Now we are working together on NIH issues. We are very upset about
some of the false claims that are being made about ecigarettes, and we
want the truth out.
So before he leaves the floor, I want to thank the Senator.