[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 12, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S937-S939]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CLIMATE CHANGE
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, this marks the 58th consecutive week
we have been in session where I have
[[Page S938]]
come to the floor to seek to wake up this Congress to the threat of
climate change.
Carbon pollution from the burning of fossil fuels is altering the
climate. The consensus around this fact within the scientific
community--and in fact the reality-based community--is overwhelming.
Since the industrial revolution, humans have dumped 2 trillion metric
tons of carbon dioxide into the air and oceans--and counting. The EPA
estimates that in 2011, the United States alone emitted more than 5.6
billion tons of carbon dioxide.
We know the concentration of carbon in the atmosphere is higher than
it has been in the history of mankind. We know that when we put more
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, it warms up the planet. This has
been understood science since Abraham Lincoln was President.
We know the ocean absorbs 90 percent of the excess heat and 30
percent of the carbon in the air. As water warms, it expands, and sea
levels go up. This is called the law of thermal expansion. We know that
when carbon dissolves in water, it increases the levels of carbonic
acid in the water. This is a law of chemistry. We know from simple
measurements that seawater is acidifying at a rate we haven't seen at
any time in the past 50 million years. We are a species of homo sapiens
who have been on the planet for a little over 200,000. So 50 million
takes us back a way.
When we put these things together, and then look at things like 37
straight years with a global temperature above the 20th century
average, sea level up 10 inches in Newport, RI, oyster spat killed off
by acidic water in Washington State, shorter seasons for ski resort
operators and longer seasons for wildfire fighters, our climate is
changing. The scientific debate is long settled, and public awareness
of the crisis is growing stronger and even across party lines.
Outside these walls of Congress, which have been barricaded by lies
and special interest propaganda, Americans of all stripes, including
more and more responsible Republican voices, acknowledge the threat of
climate change and call for responsible solutions. Yet Congress remains
trapped behind a barricade of polluting special interest influence.
Republicans in Congress refuse to get serious.
It wasn't always this way. Conservation of this land's natural
resources used to be a core value of the Republican party, and
protecting future generations' natural birthright from plundering by
special-interest industry was a cornerstone of Republican leadership.
This month actually marks the anniversary of a milestone in that kind
of American leadership.
On February 1, 1905, President Theodore Roosevelt established the
U.S. Forest Service. Fed up with the cronyism and bureaucracy that
defined the weak existing conservation programs, he dissolved the
Bureau of Forestry within the Department of Agriculture and transferred
management of the 63 million acres of national forests under the
Department of the Interior to the new Forest Service.
Roosevelt resented the ``malefactors of great wealth,'' as he called
them, the timber and mining interests whose ``selfish and shortsighted
greed,'' he called it, ``seeks to exploit [our natural resources] in
such fashion as to ruin them, and thereby to leave our children and our
children's children heirs only to an exhausted and impoverished
inheritance.''
Roosevelt not only knew how to say the right thing, he knew how to
say it well.
Pictured here is Teddy Roosevelt looking across the vast expanse of
Mogollon Rim in Arizona, one of the many forests transferred to the
newly created Forest Service. With the President is Gifford Pinchot, a
prime advocate of the Forest Service. As its first Chief, Pinchot
restructured and professionalized the management of the national
forests. During Roosevelt's Presidency, the Federal forest system grew
by nearly 130 million acres. In total, he extended protection to an
additional 230 million acres of our Nation's land.
Roosevelt said:
We have become great in a material sense because of the
lavish use of our resources, and we have just reason to be
proud of our growth. But the time has come to inquire
seriously what will happen when our forests are gone, when
the coal, the iron, the oil, and the gas are exhausted, when
the soils shall have been still further impoverished and
washed into the streams, polluting the rivers.
Today, some of these long-cherished American forests, grasslands, and
landscapes are under assault due to climate change.
In July 2010, the Forest Service issued its ``National Roadmap for
Responding to Climate Change.'' Specifically, the Forest Service report
says:
Most of the urgent forest and grassland management
challenges of the past 20 years, such as wildfires, changing
water regimes, and expanding forest insect infestations, have
been driven, in part, by a changing climate. Future impacts
are projected to be even more severe.
Our Bicameral Task Force on Climate Change, which I chair with
Congressman Waxman, hosted a roundtable of firefighters and State and
Federal foresters. Here is what Dave Cleaves, the Forest Service's
Climate Change Advisor, told us:
So what have we been seeing? . . . The length of the fire
season increasing by more than 60 days over the last 10
years, the annual area burned by wildfire increasing more
than four times what it was in the 1970s; the portion of the
area burned by large fires has gone up two to seven times, so
most of that increase in acreage has been because of the
large fires, and the extreme part of the distribution of
fires.
. . . So we have a big issue on our hands, it's an
ecological issue, it's an economic issue, it's a social
issue, and dealing with it means we have to understand it
better and understand some of the related challenges.
Shown here is the devastation from the largest rim fire in the Sierra
Nevada range in recorded history. The healthy forest is shown 2 years
prior to the fire on the left, while monitoring right before the fire
showed a sudden decline in the health of the forest caused by the
western pine beetle killing ponderosa pine and making the forest
vulnerable to burning. This is a beetle that is killed off by cold
weather. So where it can infest forests is limited by cold weather and
altitude, of course, because it gets colder at higher altitudes.
With climate change, the territory of the infestation has expanded,
and we see this change from a healthy forest to this. When it turns to
this, it can burn. On the right we see the charred and unrecognizable
landscape. Although we cannot definitively attribute any single fire to
climate change, according to a 2012 comprehensive science report for
the U.S. forest sector, increased temperature and drought can increase
frequency and magnitude of fires and amplify insect and pathogen
outbreaks which affect forest health. For example, Montana's deep
freezes used to kill off the pine bark beetle. Today, that beetle kills
millions of acres of trees across the American West.
President Roosevelt issued a warning a century ago:
One distinguishing characteristic of really civilized men
is foresight. We have to, as a nation, exercise foresight for
this nation in the future; and if we do not exercise that
foresight, dark will be the future.
Have we heeded Roosevelt's warning? We can clearly foresee the
devastation climate change will bring. Yet many modern Republicans,
particularly those in Congress, are aligning themselves with the
polluters and deniers to manufacture doubt about the science and fight
any limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
Roosevelt, a Republican, had foresight to protect the natural
resources we relay on, but his once great party has lost track of his
ideals. Democrats and Republicans should be working with President
Obama to implement his climate action plan to reduce carbon pollution.
But when the Environment and Public Works Committee recently held an
oversight hearing on the President's plan, what did we get from our
Republican colleagues? Flat-out climate denial--the polluter party
line.
Theodore Roosevelt, the great Republican conservationist, stood up to
polluting special interests. He was, in the name of the recent book,
``The Wilderness Warrior.''
Today, too many Republicans in Congress have joined polluting
corporate special interests in their war on the wilderness. Perhaps
they should listen to another Roosevelt. Theodore Roosevelt IV is the
great-grandson of the 26th President, and he is still a Republican. He
wants his fellow Republicans
[[Page S939]]
to return to the values of his great-grandfather.
It seems to be beyond the scope of many on the right to
say, for instance, that species extinction, as a result of
unrestrained human activity, is immoral and indefensible;
that our refusal to seriously engage in a global effort to
address climate change is unethical and imprudent.
There are such clear warnings. The facts speak for themselves. The
denial position has shown itself to be nonsense, a sham. Yet in
Congress we sleepwalk on. Every day more and more Americans realize the
truth, and they increasingly want this Congress to wake up. They know
that climate change is real.
It is time to wake up and to do the work necessary to combat climate
change. It is time for us to heed the words of President Theodore
Roosevelt:
Here is your country. Cherish these natural wonders,
cherish the natural resources, cherish the history and
romance as a sacred heritage, for your children and your
children's children. Do not let selfish men or greedy
interests skin your country of its beauty, its riches or its
romance.
Let us wake up.
I yield the floor, and I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Blumenthal). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________