[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 11, 2014)]
[House]
[Page H1725]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RUSSIAN OCCUPATION OF THE COUNTRY OF GEORGIA
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
Illinois (Mr. Shimkus) for 5 minutes.
Mr. SHIMKUS. Mr. Speaker, as Rob departs the Chamber, let me thank
him for his service and for his family's service. As, obviously, the
first Republican Member to be able to respond to your comments, let me
say what most of us always know, that although many of us disagree on
public policy, no one has ever questioned your commitment, your
sacrifice, your focus, and your tenacity, and I think I value that more
than almost anything we do.
Your words are very important for us and for the American people to
understand that spirited debate is not bad. It is a part of this
process. As a former high school teacher in government history, we
would relish this in our classrooms, to have this type of exchange
between our students. So thank you for that, and I am just fortunate to
be here when you made your comments.
Now, Mr. Speaker, I would like to focus and turn my comments to
Sochi, Russia. As the world focuses on that area of the world, let me
talk about what is going on on the southern side of the Caucasus
mountain range.
In the country of Georgia, a small country, people have to understand
that the Russian Federation occupies two provinces of the country of
Georgia, actually, with military troops: one for a long time, South
Ossetia, one relatively recently in Abkhazia.
That kind of changes the understanding of this great show that the
Russian Federation is putting on with the treatment of their neighbors
in occupying provinces. That would be like a country occupying one or
two of our States and occupying one or two of the provinces in Georgia.
So, Mr. Speaker, it is important to just remind the public of this,
especially when the world's focus is there. And I want to specifically
talk about what has happened with the Olympics and the Abkhazia region,
using Olympic security as an excuse.
Russia has actively created a so-called buffer zone between Abkhazia
and Georgia, pushing the cease-fire line established in 2008 7 miles
further into Georgia territory. So here we have an international peace
agreement that kind of sets a line allowing the occupation in Georgian
territory of Russian forces, and then the Russian Federation decides,
based upon the Olympics, to push that line further into the country of
Georgia 7 more miles.
It is a very troubling extension of Russia's earlier efforts to
enclose South Ossetia, this other province, in a barbed wire enclave.
And this new incursion of Georgian territory is a violation of
Georgia's sovereignty as it stands in stark contrast to Russia's many
commitments under international law.
According to the cease-fire signed on August 12, 2008, Russian
military forces were to return to their pre-war positions, yet they
have now established militarized security perimeters on the Georgian
side of the administrative border with both South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
This is a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, to
which Russia is a signatory, and a violation of customary international
law.
Russian President Putin claims that he must close borders within the
internationally recognized territory of Georgia to prevent security
threats in Sochi. This move is nothing more than a power grab. I will
continue to support Georgia's sovereignty and urge my colleagues to do
the same.
____________________