[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 23 (Thursday, February 6, 2014)]
[Senate]
[Pages S813-S814]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AGRICULTURAL ACT OF 2014
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Farm bill policies touch the lives of all Americans,
not just those who work in the agricultural sector. In addition to
reauthorizing farm programs, this legislation deals with domestic and
international food aid, conservation and the environment, trade, rural
development, renewable energy, forestry, and financial markets, among
other issues. This year's reauthorization presented an opportunity to
enact significant reforms in these areas. While some progress was made,
I believe the bill falls short of its potential, and ultimately I could
not support it.
The farm bill takes an important step toward reform by ending the
longstanding practice of giving direct payments to farmers of certain
commodity crops regardless of whether they experienced losses or even
planted a crop. It also tightens limits on the amount of farm payments
an individual can receive, expands crop insurance opportunities for
specialty and organic crops, establishes conservation compliance as a
requirement for receiving premium insurance subsidies, and invests in
rural broadband.
In spite of these successes, however, the farm bill does not do
enough for Rhode Island families.
Of greatest concern to me, it cuts $8.6 billion over 10 years from
the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, SNAP, also known as food
stamps. These cuts could reduce food stamp benefits for as many as
850,000 households across the country, including tens of thousands in
Rhode Island. SNAP is our Nation's most important antihunger program.
In this challenging economic climate, it is wrong to cut critical food-
assistance funding.
In addition, this farm bill, like its predecessors, fails to provide
adequate support for our fishermen in Rhode Island and nationwide. Farm
bill programs provide billions of dollars in subsidies and technical
assistance to farmers every year. In comparison, fishermen have little
access to similar kinds of Federal assistance. Despite attempts to
correct this inequity, fishermen remain second-class citizens when it
comes to Federal support.
Finally, American agriculture springs from the richness of our land
[[Page S814]]
and natural resources, and the farm bill has long supported programs to
conserve and protect those resources. As the harmful effects of climate
change become more prevalent, our agricultural policy should reflect
the threat posed to farming and food production by these changes. In
this farm bill, ``climate change'' and ``extreme weather'' are hardly
mentioned. Congress can start by opening the Regional Conservation
Partnership Program to climate change adaptation and mitigation
projects.
The farm bill is important and wide-ranging legislation.
Unfortunately, the conference report leaves out essential protections
for low-income Americans, hard-hit fisheries, and precious natural
resources.
____________________