[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 182 (Friday, December 20, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Pages S9084-S9086]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OBAMACARE
Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I rise today to discuss the debacle that is
the so-called Affordable Care Act. I don't think there is anyone in
this Chamber, Republican or Democrat, who would dispute that thus far
the implementation of this law has been a disaster, particularly with
regard to the healthcare.gov Web site and the President's promise that
``if you like your health care plan, you can keep it.''
The administration has admitted that it bungled the rollout and has
tried to cover up for what PolitiFact dubbed ``the lie of the year,''
by passing the buck to States and insurers as to whether individuals
would be able to keep their plans for the next year.
Let's be clear about this. ObamaCare's problems are deeply rooted in
its DNA, and they are far larger, far bigger than just a Web site. Is
the Web site causing the cost of health insurance premiums to go up
dramatically? Is the Web site causing businesses to force more and more
employees to work part-time? Is the Web site sending out cancellation
notices to patients and consumers, telling them that their health care
plans are no longer available? Of course not. Yet as the functionality
of the Web site continues to improve, the administration is starting to
talk as if every problem with the law has been fixed and that all the
other issues are going to simply dissolve.
We know that is not the case. In reality the problems with ObamaCare
are only beginning. I would like to take a few minutes to discuss some
of the problems we are going to be seeing in the future as the
President's health law continues to be implemented. I have to say that
when it comes to ObamaCare, it is a little difficult to make
predictions. That is because the administration has gone to great
lengths to muddy the waters with delayed deadlines and unilateral
policy changes. However, I think we can look through the opaque waters
and identify at least six general areas where we can expect to see
major problems in the coming months. These are six areas among many,
but theses are six I want to talk about today.
No. 1, we are going to continue to see problems with the
implementation of ObamaCare. Like I said, there have undoubtedly been
improvements to the Web site. They should be able to resolve that
problem. It is a technical problem. It is a shame it was not resolved
to begin with. It is a shame that enough time wasn't given to resolve
it, but there still are issues that are far from resolved besides that.
Let's just look at the enrollment in the exchanges to see how things
are going. As of November 30, roughly 365,000 individuals enrolled in
health insurance coverage through the State and Federal exchanges. That
is a small improvement from the numbers that we saw at the end of
October but still far short of the benchmarks that the Department of
Health and Human Services had set for enrollment in the exchanges.
Originally, HHS touted a goal of enrolling 7 million people in the
exchanges by March of 2014. According to a memo obtained by the
Associated press, HHS projected that on the way to reaching that goal
of 7 million enrollees, they would enroll roughly half a million people
in the first month. Yet after 2 months they were still more than
100,000 people short of that one-month benchmark, which is not a high
benchmark in my opinion.
[[Page S9085]]
The same memo projected that they would have 3.3 million enrollees by
the end of 2013. Yet, if they are going to reach that goal, they will
have to enroll nearly 10 times as many people as they have enrolled so
far in just the next week and a half.
Sure, many of these enrollment problems are due to a poorly designed
and poorly executed Web site, but even with the Web site's
improvements, it would take a substantial miracle for the
administration to meet its enrollment goals for the coming months.
There are other significant problems to be concerned about, most
notably those associated with the premium subsidy program administered
by the IRS.
Earlier this month the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration issued a report that found that the IRS has an
inadequate system in place for preventing fraudulent premium subsidy
payments from occurring and that people's personal information will
likely be at risk. That is the Inspector General for Tax
Administration. That is not Republicans. There are real questions as to
whether the IRS can effectively verify the income of those applying for
these subsidies. I have also raised the concern on a number of
occasions.
Similar tax subsidy programs, including, for example, the Earned
Income Tax Credit, EITC, that are paid out before they are verified,
have improper payment rates as high as 25 percent. Think of that.
If we see the same improper payment rate on these ObamaCare subsidies
as we do on the EITC, it will end up costing taxpayers hundreds of
billions of dollars over the next 10 years. As I have said in the past,
the ObamaCare premium subsidies with the lack of security and
safeguards are a fraudster's dream. We have warned the administration,
and I personally warned the administration.
The administration may claim that with the recent improvement to the
healthcare.gov Web site all is now right with the world. However, as
you can see, there are a number of administrative problems that, even
with a functional Web site, have yet to be resolved.
No. 2, Americans will be left without coverage due to the problems
with ObamaCare. As a result of the dismal rollout of ObamaCare, many
Americans, particularly those who have tried to enroll in the
exchanges, could very well end up being uninsured for a time. Maybe a
significant time.
Last week an article appeared in the Washington Post that told the
stories of people had were forced out of their existing health plans
due to ObamaCare's coverage mandates but are unable to sign up for the
new plans on the exchange due to the failings of the Web site. The
deadline for signing up for coverage that starts on January 1, 2014, is
December 23, 2013. Anyone who has been kicked off their plan who is
unable to sign up before that date, which is just a few days away, will
find themselves facing a gap in medical coverage.
For the chronically ill or for people with expensive medical
conditions, this gap in coverage will be particularly acute. These
people are, according to the Washington Post, ``ObamaCare's biggest
losers.'' Yet, ostensibly, these are the very people that this law was
enacted for and supposed to help.
Another reason countless Americans may end up seeing gaps in coverage
is simply because they will be unable to navigate the ever-changing
landscape that is ObamaCare's dates and deadlines. Due to the failures
of the rollout, the administration has delayed or shifted virtually
every deadline associated with obtaining and paying for coverage. For
example, like I said, the deadline for enrolling in insurance coverage
that starts on January 1 is December 23, just a few days away. The
deadline for actually getting the first premium payment to insurers is
December 31. Both of these dates have been moved at least once already
and could be moved again. They probably will be. On top of that, the
administration has issued statements ``encouraging'' insurers to extend
their own deadlines for payment and enrollment.
This is on top of the delays in the employer mandate, the SHOP
exchanges, and the countless other provisions we have seen delayed or
extended over the past year.
People are bound to be confused by all of these changes. It is nearly
impossible for anyone, let alone those with serious medical conditions,
to keep track of the ever-changing deadlines the administration keeps
issuing. With no clarity as to when people should sign up and who they
should pay and when, it is a virtual certainty that many consumers will
find themselves uncovered for a period of time through no fault of
their own.
The administration added to all of this uncertainty last night with
the announcement it was going to allow people with canceled insurance
plans to either buy catastrophic plans or avoid the requirement that
they buy health insurance altogether. It has been less than a full day,
and already this decision is causing confusion among insurers. It will
almost certainly do the same for consumers.
It seems the Obama administration is making all of this up as they go
along. Undoubtedly, many people will suffer the consequences of this
ineptitude. The administration should be ashamed of the way this is
bollixed up and messed up, and it is just going to get worse.
No. 3, there will continue to be spikes in premiums and other costs.
We have already seen what is happening to the price of insurance in the
individual market. Thanks to ObamaCare, millions of people have already
lost their existing health insurance and have found that their options
on the exchanges come with much higher premiums. This sticker shock has
been widely reported. But that is not the end of the crisis problem.
Unfortunately, many people are also finding that their out-of-pocket
costs will be dramatically increased thanks to higher copayments and
prescription drug costs, included in plans on the exchanges. In many
cases, it is difficult for patients to determine which medications are
covered on the ObamaCare plans.
Unlike in Medicare Part D, the ObamaCare Web site does not have a
plan finder that would enable consumers to search for plans based on
coverage. These new costs are particularly high when compared with the
insurance plans that were recently canceled.
But it is not just happening in the individual market. These price
spikes are also hitting people with employer-provided insurance.
According to a recent poll by the Associated Press, nearly half of
Americans with job-based or other private insurance say their policies
will be changing next year, mostly for the worse. So 69 percent say
that the cost of their insurance will be going up; 59 percent say their
annual deductibles or copayments are increasing. The Affordable Care
Act did little to reign in the actual cost of health care.
When you add in the costs associated with the law's mandates and
regulations, costs are going up, particularly for small businesses, our
main job creators.
A recent survey of small business owners by the National Federation
of Independent Business confirmed that this is already starting to
happen. In the survey, 64 percent of small businesses reported that
they paid more for employee health insurance premiums in 2013 than they
did in 2012. Small business owners consistently cite the rising cost of
health care as their top business concern.
This brings us to the next obvious prediction, No. 4. Millions of
people will lose their existing employer-provided health insurance.
Once again, we are all too familiar with President Obama's infamous
promise, ``If you like your health care plan, you can keep it,'' but
little has been said about the threats ObamaCare's mandates pose to
people who get their health insurance from their employers.
Put simply, the health law was designed specifically to invalidate
existing health care plans--those deemed inadequate by the drafters of
the law--in order to force people into more expensive plans with
expanded coverage they don't necessarily want or need. This applies to
both individual market plans and employer-provided plans alike. The
administration's own estimates, published in the Federal Register,
predicted that tens of millions of Americans with employer-sponsored--
keep in mind, employer-sponsored--insurance will see their plans
invalidated by the
[[Page S9086]]
so-called Affordable Care Act's mandates and regulations.
According to a recent analysis by the American Enterprise Institute,
as many as 50 to 100 million insurance policies in the employer-
provided insurance market will see their plans canceled next fall when
all business plans must be fully compliant with ObamaCare's insurance
mandates. At that point businesses will have to face a difficult
choice: Offer a more expensive health care plan to their employees or
send employees into the exchanges. As we have already seen, that is not
a great place to be.
No. 5, health insurers will either leave the market or face
bankruptcy. One of the foundational assumptions made by the drafters of
the Affordable Care Act was that the costs to insurers of providing
vastly expanded coverage would be offset when more young and healthy
patients are brought into the risk pools. Indeed, this is almost the
entire basis for the individual mandate. The problem is that so far
this doesn't seem to be happening, and I doubt it ever will. There is
good reason to question whether it ever will. With the ever-increasing
cost of insurance as a direct result of ObamaCare, there will likely be
many who opt to stay out of the market altogether.
There is ample data right now to support this conclusion. For
example, in a poll released earlier this month from the Harvard
Institute of Politics, those in the millennial generation--the very
people whom proponents of ObamaCare desperately need to add to the
insurance pool--were shown to be highly skeptical of the law. In the
poll, a majority of 18- to 29-year-olds disapproved of the Affordable
Care Act and said it will increase their personal health care costs.
Only 18 percent of respondents in that age group said they thought the
law would improve their health care.
Clearly, the authors of ObamaCare thought that the individual
mandate, along with the strong sense of civic duty, would coerce people
into acting against their own interests and paying expanded costs for
coverage they don't necessarily want or need; however, in the real
world where people weigh costs and benefits before making a decision,
millions of people are more likely to pay a fine instead of entering a
skewed and unstable insurance market where costs are forever going up.
A lot of these young people will not even pay the fine because there is
no penalty for not doing so.
Without a greatly expanded risk pool of younger and healthier
consumers, it is not going to be worth it for many insurers to stay in
the market. Those insurers who do stay and try to stick it out will do
so at greater risk to their financial future.
Insurers are not the only ones facing a dismal economic outlook as a
result of ObamaCare, which brings me to my final prediction. Remember,
I am just limiting it to six today. I will have more later.
No. 6, ObamaCare will continue to be a drag on business and our
overall economy. It isn't just patients and consumers who are suffering
under ObamaCare; employers are also facing difficulties as a direct
result of ObamaCare. As I have discussed here on the floor at length in
anticipation of the employer mandate, businesses all across the country
have either reduced employment or have stopped hiring. Workers who had
full-time jobs before the passage of ObamaCare are finding themselves
moved into part-time work because under the law employers will be
forced to provide coverage for full-time workers.
Even the unions, which were among the largest and biggest supporters
of the health law when it was being debated in Congress, have come out
and said the law is destroying the 40-hour workweek for American
workers.
Last week the National Association of Manufacturers released its
quarterly survey of its members which showed overwhelmingly that the
President's health care law is having a negative impact on the
manufacturing sector. According to that survey, more than 20 percent of
manufacturers have cut or decelerated their business investment as a
result of ObamaCare. Nearly one-quarter of them have either reduced
employment or ceased hiring. Roughly one-third of them say they have
reduced their business outlook for 2014 as a result of the so-called
Affordable Care Act. And more than 77 percent--nearly 8 in 10--of
manufacturers cited rising health insurance costs as a primary business
challenge.
In other words, at a time when our economy is growing at a sluggish
pace and job growth remains lackluster, the President and Democrats in
Congress continue to support a health care law that is making America a
much more difficult place to do business and to find and keep a job. It
is only going to get worse as this wears on. These are just some of the
problems we are going to see in the coming months as a direct result of
ObamaCare, and they are not going to go away so long as the Affordable
Care Act remains in place.
As I see it, with 2013 coming to a close, the President and his
allies here in Congress are at a crossroads. As I see it, they have two
choices: They can continue to double down on the same failed policy
that is increasing the cost of health insurance in this country and
causing millions of people to lose their existing coverage and will
continue to wreak havoc well into the future or they can, for once, try
to work with Republicans on replacing this failure with something that
has a real chance of success. I hope that eventually my colleagues will
choose the latter, but needless to say I don't think I can keep my
hopes up.
Last but not least, I hope this is not leading to a throwing of the
hands in the air, admitting this doesn't work, and then saying we have
to go to socialized medicine, or what many call a single-payer system.
If we do that, I have to tell you, we will never get out from under
this mess.
We had a system that was working pretty well. There were up to 30
million people who did not have coverage. Why didn't we just
concentrate governmentally on helping the 30 million people rather than
doing this colossally bad bill that we are all going to rue the day we
did? I am so concerned about it.
There are ways we can work together. I really believe we have to find
some folks on the other side of the aisle who really understand this
and who really understand that they are getting killed by this bill.
Hopefully, we can find some folks who will sit down and work with
people like myself. I have been instrumental in an awful lot of health
care legislation over the last 37 years. Hopefully, we can work
together in order to get this terrible problem resolved. I am concerned
about it.
Health care should never have been a partisan issue, and in this case
it is a totally partisan issue. Every Democrat in the House and Senate
voted for it. Not a single Republican in the House or Senate voted for
it. We all voted against it, knowing in advance that it would be a
disaster. Frankly, I would like to get rid of the disaster, and I hope
we can find some colleagues on the other side who will be willing to
work to do that.
I hope the President will wake up. I think he thinks he is going to
double down and fight for this, when, in fact, it is killing his
reputation and the Democratic Party's reputation as well.
We clearly can't keep going the way we are.
I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from South Carolina.
Mr. GRAHAM. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. GRAHAM. I ask unanimous consent to be able to engage the Senator
from New Hampshire in a colloquy for about 20 minutes. I would
appreciate it if the Presiding Officer would let us know when the 20
minutes has expired. I would like to discuss the military retiree
position and the budget with Senator Ayotte when she gets here.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________