[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 166 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[House]
[Page H7257]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AFGHANISTAN
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
North Carolina (Mr. Jones) for 5 minutes.
Mr. JONES. Mr. Speaker, I am again on the floor today because our
Nation has failed to heed the warning of George Washington, who told us
to beware of foreign entanglements.
We have lost over 4,474 Americans in Iraq and 2,276 Americans in
Afghanistan. In both of these wars combined, 46,720 of our
servicemembers have been wounded. Furthermore, the American taxpayer is
spending $10.45 million every hour to pay for the cost of the war in
Afghanistan since 2001. Mr. Speaker, let me repeat that. We are
spending $10.45 million an hour just to pay for the money spent in
Afghanistan since 2001. Despite these facts, we are now entering into a
long-term agreement that, at best, is a failure--at best is a failure.
It is with great disappointment that I share an NBC article,
entitled, ``Endless Afghanistan? United States-Afghanistan Agreement
Would Keep Troops in Place and Funds Flowing Perhaps Indefinitely''--
perhaps until 2024. I would like to read a short paragraph and submit
for the record a few additional excerpts.
While many Americans have been led to believe the war in
Afghanistan will soon be over, a draft of a key United
States-Afghan security deal obtained by NBC News shows the
United States is prepared to maintain military outposts in
Afghanistan for many years to come, and pay to support
hundreds of thousands of Afghan security forces.
Mr. Speaker, George Washington was right. Afghanistan is an
impossible situation. History has proven that it is impossible. The
Bilateral Security Agreement will only serve to endanger American lives
and squander taxpayers' money. I implore my colleagues on both sides of
the aisle to join me in standing up for the American people in
opposition to the signing of this agreement.
Mr. Speaker, the President has the constitutional right to enter into
the agreement. We have no oversight on the agreement itself, but we can
put a resolution on the floor and let the Congress debate and let the
American people know that we realize what we are doing in Afghanistan,
instead of continuing to pass budget bills to fund Karzai.
Mr. Speaker, I have got a little poster here of Karzai. The man is a
corrupt leader. All he is doing is taking the taxpayers' money and
becoming richer and richer. Mr. Speaker, the funny and sad thing about
this in the poster--it is a cartoon--there is a poor American soldier
standing behind Karzai, who is at a money machine, and it says the
thoughts of the soldier:
I would like to make a quick withdrawal from here.
To the American soldier, I am sorry to say, if we don't do our job in
Congress, you will be there until 2024.
The American people need to call their Members of Congress and say
that we do not accept this agreement to keep our troops there until
2024. If you can't stop it, at least have a debate on the floor of the
House and pass a resolution to say this is what the American people
want to see: no long-term agreement with Afghanistan.
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank God for blessing our troops and blessing
America.
Excerpts for the Record from NBC News Article ``Endless Afghanistan?
US-Afghan Agreement Would Keep Troops in Place and Funds Flowing,
Perhaps Indefinitely''
While many Americans have been led to believe the war in
Afghanistan will soon be over, a draft of a key U.S.-Afghan
security deal obtained by NBC News shows the United States is
prepared to maintain military outposts in Afghanistan for
many years to come, and pay to support hundreds of thousands
of Afghan security forces.
The wide-ranging document, still unsigned by the United
States and Afghanistan, has the potential to commit thousands
of American troops to Afghanistan and spend billions of U.S.
taxpayer dollars.
The document outlines what appears to be the start of a
new, open-ended military commitment in Afghanistan in the
name of training and continuing to fight al-Qaeda. The war in
Afghanistan doesn't seem to be ending, but renewed under new,
scaled-down U.S.-Afghan terms.
The deal, according to the text, would take effect on Jan.
1, 2015 and ``shall remain in force until the end of 2024 and
beyond.''
The document doesn't specifically say how many U.S. and
NATO troops would remain in Afghanistan beyond 2014. Afghan
officials tell NBC News they hope it will be 10 to 15
thousand. U.S. officials tell NBC News the number is closer
to seven to eight thousand, with an additional contribution
from NATO.
Factoring in troop rotations, home leave, and breaks
between deployments, the service of tens of thousands of
American troops would be required to maintain a force of
seven to eight thousand for a decade or longer. The
anticipated costs would likely run into the billions quickly.
[T]he United States shall have an obligation to seek funds
on a yearly basis to support the training, equipping,
advising and sustaining of the Afghan National Security
Forces (ANSF).
____________________