[Congressional Record Volume 159, Number 153 (Wednesday, October 30, 2013)]
[Senate]
[Page S7685]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION EXTENSION ACT OF 2013
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate
proceed to the consideration of H.R. 3190.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
A bill (H.R. 3190) to provide for the continued performance
of the functions of the United States Parole Commission, and
for other purposes.
There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, the United States Parole Commission is
scheduled to expire tomorrow. After significant bicameral negotiations,
2 weeks ago, the House of Representatives passed by unanimous consent a
bipartisan bill, H.R. 3190, to reauthorize the commission for 5 years.
Public safety demands that we pass this legislation swiftly and I urge
the Senate to support its immediate enactment. We should have passed
this bill weeks ago, but a single Republican hold has placed us in the
precarious position of seeking passage on the eve of expiration. This
is not the way to protect public safety.
The Parole Commission is responsible for granting or denying parole
for Federal and District of Columbia prisoners who were sentenced
before the Federal and DC Governments abolished parole. The commission
was created to consider the requests of these ``old law'' Federal and
DC inmates, but it also has jurisdiction over more recent DC offenders
who are on supervised release from prison. In addition, the commission
supervises some military law offenders, State offenders in the witness
protection program, and foreign-law offenders serving sentences in the
United States.
The consequences of failing to reauthorize the commission would be
dire. ``Old law'' Federal and DC inmates are required by law to receive
periodic parole hearings. If the commission were unavailable to hold
these hearings and declare that certain inmates should not be paroled,
around 3,500 inmates would be released. Potentially dangerous
individuals would be allowed to simply walk free without any assessment
of the risk to public safety if this reauthorization does not pass the
Senate immediately.
Failure to reauthorize the commission would have particularly harsh
consequences for the District of Columbia. The commission currently
sets the conditions of supervision for DC offenders and determines when
those conditions have been violated. If the commission were to cease
operations, around 9,000 offenders would no longer receive adequate
supervision. These include extremely dangerous criminals, such as
murderers and rapists.
Congress has consistently recognized the importance of the
commission, reauthorizing it on 6 prior occasions. We last reauthorized
the commission 2 years ago. At that time, the Republican-led House of
Representatives unanimously passed a bill to extend the commission for
3 years, but a single Senator blocked the bill and insisted on only a
2-year extension.
So we are here now, 2 years later, and the House has appropriately
passed a bipartisan 5-year extension. I have been working with the
House since July on this straightforward reauthorization. As the House
recognizes, the need for the commission will not cease within the next
5 years. In fact, it is estimated that Federal ``old-law'' offenders
will require parole decisions for the next 35 years.
I hope we can agree to this 5-year extension, which includes
extensive annual reporting requirements that will allow Congress to
conduct oversight of the commission. All of the reporting requirements
from the last reauthorization are included, along with new requirements
related specifically to the District of Columbia. There is nothing
objectionable in this bill, and there is no substantive reason for
anyone to block it.
The events of the past few weeks have shown deep divisions in the
House Republican caucus. But one thing on which all 232 House
Republicans agree is that the Parole Commission should be reauthorized
for another 5 years. They all agreed that releasing potentially
dangerous prisoners was a bad idea. This bill is not controversial.
As I have mentioned before, Senator Paul and I and others are working
in a bipartisan manner on sentencing reform. We believe that judges
should have more discretion in sentencing when a mandatory minimum
sentence is unnecessary and counterproductive. The extension of the
Parole Commission is quite a different matter, however. If the
commission is not reauthorized, there will be no one to decide whether
thousands of offenders are ready for parole. These inmates will simply
be released.
I want to commend the sponsor of the House bill, Congressman Steve
Chabot, along with co-sponsors Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Ranking
Member John Conyers of the House Judiciary Committee, and Chairman Jim
Sensenbrenner and Ranking Member Bobby Scott of the Subcommittee on
Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security and Investigations. They understood
the urgency and imminent consequences of inaction. Unfortunately, some
in the Senate did not share that position and now we are up against the
final deadline. It is time to end these petty games and to let Congress
do its job. We must pass this bill now.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the bill be
read three times and passed, and the motion to reconsider be considered
made and laid upon the table, with no intervening action or debate.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The bill (H.R. 3190) was ordered to a third reading, was read the
third time, and passed.
____________________